The document provides background information on the English Civil War, including definitions of key terms and groups involved. It then presents four sources from history books and educational websites from 1848 to 2005 that provide evidence for whether King Charles I was a good or bad king. The sources present differing perspectives, with some stating Charles was intelligent and dignified, while others say he was arrogant, conceited, and unfit to be king. Students are tasked with analyzing the sources to determine what evidence each provides about Charles being a good or bad ruler.
Stuart Absolutism and the English Civil WarTom Richey
These slides were created to accompany a historical lecture on Stuart England, focusing on the reigns of James I and Charles I as well as the English Civil War and Cromwell's Protectorate.
Revision lesson on the History of medicine, what factors can be identified throughout time. How do they change, are they responsible for progression or regression in your opinion?
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
811 - English Civil War Introduction
1. WALT: What was the English Civil War?
• Who Governs the United Kingdom
today? Write down who you think does
what…
2. Why is it important…
• It is the Reason why the Queen does
not govern us today.
• It is the reason why we have a
Government that we elect to create
laws and rule over us.
• It resolved the problems between the
King and Parliament.
• It lead to England EXECUTING a King.
3. WALT-What was the English Civil War?
WILFS
L4 – Describe who Parliament and the King were.
L5 - Explain whether King Charles was a good or bad King.
L6 – Use Sources and COMPARE evidence on King Charles.
4. WALT-What was the English Civil War
• Parliament – Responsible for making Laws and deciding
taxes.
• Civil War – A war between organized groups within the
same country.
• Divine Right – The belief that the King/Queen has the
right to rule directly from God.
• Parliamentarian – Supporter of the Parliamentary Cause
(Roundhead)
• Royalist – Supporter of the Monarch (Kings) Cause
(Cavalier)
6. In your own words…
• Write a description of the situation in the 1600’s – What was
the Civil War and who was involved.
• The English Civil War (1642-1651) was a series of battles
between those loyal to King Charles I (known as Royalists or
Cavaliers) and those loyal to Parliament (known as the
Parliamentarians or Roundheads). It had many short term
and long term causes…
• It was not a long continuous war (like WW1 or WW2) but a
series of major battles.
• It ended with the Public Execution of Charles I and the
establishment of a republic…
7. Source Analysis
• Draw this table in your exercise books.
Source
Author + Year
Word’s I don’t
understand.
Evidence he was
a good King
Evidence he was
a bad King
1
Thomas Macauley
1848
Domestic
Intelligent /
Well Educated
N/A
2
James Oliphant
1920
3
Andrey Langley
1993
4
Educational
Website
2005
8. What you should have had…
Source
Author + Year
1
Thomas Macauley
1848
2
James Oliphant
1920
3
Andrey Langley
1993
4
Educational
Website
2005
Word’s I don’t
understand.
Evidence he was
a good King
Evidence he was
a bad King
Domestic
Intelligent /
Well Educated
N/A
Handsome /
Popular
Stupid and
Cold Hearted /
Unfit for King
Married Sis of Shy but serious
France for
– Got off to
Peace - Religion
bad star
N/A
Unpopular /
Arrogant /
Conceited.
9. Source 1:
Charles I was an intelligent and well
educated gentleman. His taste in
literature and art was excellent, his
manner dignified. His domestic life
was without blemish.
“The history of England” by Thomas
Macauley — written in 1848 (199
years after Charles I died).
Source 2:
Charles I was a handsome man with cultivated
tastes, but he was unfit for the position of king. He was
too stupid and cold-hearted to understand or
sympathise with the feelings of his people, and events
were to prove that he was hopelessly obstinate, selfcentred and untrustworthy.
“A history of England” by James Oliphant — written in
1920 (320 years after Charles I was born).
Sources
Source 3:
The new king was shy, serious and deeply
religious. Charles’ reign got off to a bad start.
Needing a queen he married Henrietta
Maria, the sister of the king of France. She was
a Catholic, and Parliament was alarmed that
she might make Charles and their children
Catholic too.
“The Stuarts” by Andrew Langley. A children’s
history book. It was written in 1993.
Source 4:
Charles had a very different personality
compared to James (his father). Charles was
arrogant and conceited. He found it difficult to
believe that a king could be wrong. This belief
was known as the ‘Divine Right of Kings’, and
it made him unpopular.
From an educational website, written in 2005
(more than 400 years after Charles I was
born).
10. Sources
1) Which sources tell you that Charles I was a good king?
Source ‘X’ tells me that Charles I was a good king. It says ___
This means that he is a good king because ___
2) Which sources tell you that Charles I was a bad king?
Source ‘X’ tells me that Charles I was a bad king. It says ___
This means that he is a bad king because ___
Extension: Which of his weaknesses might get Charles into trouble
with the people of England? Explain why.
11. Peer Assessment.
• Level 4c: If they used only 1 source to describe Charles I as a good
or a bad king.
• Level 4b: If they used 2 sources to show Charles as a good or a
bad king.
• Level 4a: If they mentioned 2 or more sources to describe Charles
I as a good and a bad king.
• Level 5c: If they explained what 1 source means.
• Level 5b: If they explained what 2 sources mean.
• Level 5a: If they explained what 3 or more sources mean.
12. Post It – Was King Charles a
Good King or a Bad King – 1 Thing
GOOD
Stick in on the Board
BAD
