Project 3

1. FMP Evaluation
Leticia Pozze

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
• Strengths:
– Using research PowerPoint I can collect ideas of the existing products by
describing them to how this product will be similar to mine.
– My research PowerPoint helped me by given me ideas and the things make
clearly using the product research and the questionnaires because I could see
what the audience actually wants see in my product, and that helped me a lot.
• Weaknesses:
– The research PowerPoint doesn’t gave me all information that I might needed
to make my product.
– In the next time I want improve the audience profile and some existing
product.
– By using this PowerPoint they helped me collect the audience opinion and
have some ideas about what exactly I wanted include in my product.

4. Planning
• Strengths:
– The planning helped me to think what I want in my project and also choose an
idea that was my final idea.
– Making my plan was quite easy because I already have some ideas that I might
want to create during this project.
– I think the planning helped me a lot because I could decide what I wanted in
my product.
• Weaknesses:
– This can take a while to get an idea that you might want to do in your project.
– I could have done better doing the informal proposal because I think I didn’t
gave lots information about my product.

5. Time Management
• I manage my time well, I complete all my project on time. If I had more
time I could improve my pamphlets doing it in a different way by changed
some stuff that I was struggle to do, but I think I have done a good work o
my final project, I’m quite happy with my products.
• Strengths:
– Using this method I could manager my time, divide my project in parts and
finished all my work in time and move on to the next and final PowerPoint.
– I can see if I’ll have enough time to finish my product.
• Weaknesses:
– Doing the time management sometimes I get confuse, in the next time I’ll try
to follow the time that I plan using the time manager.

6. Technical Qualities
In both pictures the colours are black and
white. My poster has the bottle of water in
the center of the image, this might catch
the audience’s attention, in the existing
product the focus is on all the big words
outside the bottle. I think my product
appeals more to my audience that is
teenagers.
We used the same
colour for the font,
but in my product I
focus more on the
bottle of water. I
thought it was a
good idea to fill the
bottle with reasons
to drink water.
Existing product

7. Technical Qualities
I found the Mario game similar to
mine, because in both you have to
collect items and if you die the
game will start again and you lose
life. In the Mario game the
background has lots of details,
mine is simple, just blue. The next
time I want to improve the
background by adding more
detail.
At the end both have a
door to finish the
episode or the game.
Existing product

8. Technical Qualities
I used this image to inspire me to create this pamphlet. They’re
similar because in both are given reasons to drink water and
information about how much water a person needs to drink per
day. In my project I used the same colours as my poster, the
existing product uses bright colours, white and black. In both has a
silhouette body, but on my product has a female silhouette and in
the existent product has a man silhouette.
Front Back Existing product

9. Aesthetic Qualities
I liked the most
the poster
because it looks
professional.
I would improve
the background
of my advergame
because it looks
simple, and I
really don’t like it
at most.
I forget to change the
order of the name “Spring
Water”, in the next time I
will check it.
I found this information on
internet, in the next time I’ll make
myself, because I didn’t have
enough time to improve it.
I think my
product appeals
to my audience
and those
product will
catch them
attention.
Strengths: To make the
poster I already got an
idea.
Weaknesses: In the
pamphlets I spend a while
to get some inspirations to
make it.

10. Audience Appeal
I have made the
animation and the
graphics design that my
audience wanted to see in
my product.
My product will
appeal to all
people who
prefer flavoured
water than
normal water
because my
product don’t
have a specific
colour that
might be the
fruit colour.
For those people
who doesn’t like
water, they
might find my
product
interesting and
after that can
start drink water.

11. Peer
Feedback

12. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– I like how unique it is, don’t see a lot of water
advertisement. I also like that it has a advergame
as well which influences people to drink more
water.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– The background could be different as it’s a bit
simple.

13. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?

14. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?

15. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?

16. Peer Feedback Summary