SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Decision Making and
     Reasoning
     Chapter 12
Outline
1. Judgment and Decision Making
  1.   Classical Decision Theory
  2.   Satisficing
  3.   Elimination by Aspects
  4.   Heuristics and Biases
2. Deductive Reasoning
  1. Conditional Reasoning
3. Inductive Reasoning
1. Judgment and Decision Making
• The goal of judgment and decision making is to
  select from among choices or to evaluate
  opportunities

          1. Classical Decision Theory
• Based on the assumption or rationality
  – People make their choices so as to maximize
    something of value, whatever that something may be
• Mathematical models of human decision making
  – Too restricted, does not take into account the
    psychological makeup of each individual decision
    maker
1. Judgment and Decision Making
       1. Classical Decision Theory
• Subjective expected utility theory
  – The goal of human action is to seek pleasure
    and avoid pain; in doing so each of us uses
    calculations of
    • Subjective utility – based on the individual’s judged
      weightings of utility, rather than on objective
      criteria
    • Subjective probability – based on the individual’s
      estimates of likelihood, rather than on objective
      statistical computations
1. Judgment and Decision Making
           1. Classical Decision Theory
• This theory is based on the belief that people
  seek to reach well-reasoned decisions based on
  – Consideration of all possible known alternatives
  – Use of a maximum amount of available information
  – Careful weighing of costs and benefits and calculation
    of probability
  – A maximum degree of sound reasoning

• However, human decision making is more
  complex than even this modified theory implies
1. Judgment and Decision Making
                   2. Satisficing
• We humans are not entirely and boundlessly
  rational in making decisions
• Bounded rationality
   – We are rational, but within limits
• Satisficing
   – We do not consider all possible options and then
     carefully compute which of the entire universe of
     options will maximize our gains and minimize our
     losses
   – Rather, we consider options one by one, and then we
     select an option as soon as we find one that is
     satisfactory or just good enough to meet our minimum
     level of acceptability
1. Judgment and Decision Making
             3. Elimination by Aspects
• We sometimes use a different strategy when
  faced with far more alternatives than we feel that
  we reasonably can consider in the time we have
  available
• Elimination by aspects
  – We focus on one aspect (attribute) of the various
    options, and we form a minimum criterion for that
    aspect
  – We then eliminate all options that do not meet that
    criterion
1. Judgment and Decision Making
        4. Heuristics and Biases
• Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman
  – People may be far more likely to make
    decisions based on biases and heuristics
    (short-cuts) than earlier decision-making
    research has suggested
  – These mental shortcuts lighten the cognitive
    load of making decisions, but they also allow
    for a much greater chance of error
?
All the families having exactly six children in
    a particular city were surveyed. In 72 of
    the families, the exact order of births of
     boys and girls was GBGBBG (G girl; B
                       boy).

   What is your estimate of the number of
  families surveyed in which the exact order
             of births is BGBBBB?
1. Judgment and Decision Making
            4. Heuristics and Biases
• Representativeness
  – When we use the heuristic of representativeness, in
    which we judge the probability of an uncertain event
    according to
     • (1) how obviously it is similar to or representative of the
       population from which it is derived
     • (2) the degree to which it reflects the salient features of the
       process by which it is generated
• Example on the previous slide
  – First birth order is considered to be more
    representative of the number of females and males in
    the population
  – However, either birth order is equally likely to occur by
    chance
?
 Are there more words in the English
language that begin with the letter R or
    that have R as their third letter?
?
• Calculate in your head the answer to the
  following problem:
          8x7x6x5x4x3x2x1
?
• Calculate in your head the answer to the
  following problem:
          1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8
1. Judgment and Decision Making
                 4. Heuristics and Biases
• Availability
   – We make judgments on the basis of how easily we
     can call to mind what we perceive as relevant
     instances of a phenomenon (e.g. words beginning
     with letter R)
• Anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic
   – People provide a higher estimate for the first
     sequence than for the second because their
     computation for the the anchor – the first few digits
     multiplied by each other – renders a higher estimate
     from which they make an adjustment to reach a final
     estimate
1. Judgment and Decision Making
         4. Heuristics and Biases
• Overconfidence
  – And individual’s overvaluation of her or his
    own skills, knowledge, or judgments
  – People tend to overestimate the accuracy of
    their judgments
  – Example:
    • When people were 100% confident in their
      answers, they were right only 80% of the time
2. Deductive Reasoning
• Proposition
  – An assertion, which may be either true of false
• Premise
  – Propositions about which arguments are
    made
2. Deductive Reasoning
              1. Conditional Reasoning
• The reasoner must draw a conclusion based on
  an if-then proposition
• Deductive validity
  – Does not equate with truth
  – You can reach deductively valid conclusions that are
    completely untrue with respect to the world
  – People are more likely mistakenly to accept an
    illogical argument as logical if the conclusion is
    factually true
2. Deductive Reasoning
           1. Conditional Reasoning
• Modus ponens
  – The reasoner affirms the antecedent
    If p then q
    p
    q
• Modus tollens
  – The reasoner denies the consequent
    If p then q
    non q
    non p
2. Deductive Reasoning
         1. Conditional Reasoning
• Deductive fallacies
  – Denying the antecedent
  – Affirming the consequent


• Rather then using formal inference rules,
  people often use pragmatic reasoning
  schemas
2. Deductive Reasoning
          2. Syllogistic Reasoning
• Syllogisms
  – Are deductive arguments that involve drawing
    conclusions from two premises
  – All syllogisms comprise a major premise, a
    minor premise, and a conclusion
2. Deductive Reasoning
          2. Syllogistic Reasoning
• Linear Syllogisms
  – The relationship among the terms is linear,
    involving a quantitative or qualitative
    comparison
  – Example
     • You are smarter than your best friend.
     • Your best friend is smarter than your roommate.
     • Which of you is the smartest?
2. Deductive Reasoning
          2. Syllogistic Reasoning
• Categorical Syllogisms
  – Comprise of two premises and a conclusion
  – The premises state something about the
    category memberships of the terms
  – Example:
     • All cognitive psychologists are pianists.
     • All pianists are athletes.
     • Therefore, all cognitive psychologists are athletes.
3. Inductive Reasoning
• In inductive reasoning, which is based on our
  observations, reaching any logically certain
  conclusion is not possible
• The most we can strive to reach is only a strong,
  or highly probable, conclusion
• A key feature of inductive reasoning, which
  forms the basis of the empirical method, is that
  we cannot logically leap from saying, “ all
  observed instances to date of X are Y” to saying,
  “Therefore, all X are Y”; it is always possible that
  the next observed X will not be a Y
3. Inductive Reasoning
• Causal inferences
  – How people make judgments about whether
    causes something else
• Errors in inductive reasoning
  – Confirmation bias
     • Teachers often expect little of students when they
       think them low in ability
  – Causality based on correlational evidence
    alone
     • We fail to recognize many that many phenomena
       have multiple causes
3. Inductive Reasoning
•   Reasoning by analogy
•   Example
     Fire is to asbestos as water is to
     a.   Vinyl
     b.   Air
     c.   Cotton
     d.   faucet

More Related Content

What's hot

Chapter 1 social psychology
Chapter 1 social psychologyChapter 1 social psychology
Chapter 1 social psychologyBilalAhmed717
 
Chapter 7 (states of consciousness)
Chapter 7 (states of consciousness)Chapter 7 (states of consciousness)
Chapter 7 (states of consciousness)dcrocke1
 
Cognitive psych ppt.
Cognitive psych ppt.Cognitive psych ppt.
Cognitive psych ppt.Regina Muñoz
 
Cognitive psychology
Cognitive psychologyCognitive psychology
Cognitive psychologyWEEKLYMEDIC
 
Perception Slides
Perception SlidesPerception Slides
Perception SlidesEric Castro
 
psychological perspectives
psychological perspectivespsychological perspectives
psychological perspectivesangwako
 
Reasoning & Decision Making
Reasoning & Decision MakingReasoning & Decision Making
Reasoning & Decision MakingTarun
 
Behavioural approach to abnormality
Behavioural approach to abnormalityBehavioural approach to abnormality
Behavioural approach to abnormalitynazaninjahed
 
History Of Cognitive Psychology
History Of Cognitive PsychologyHistory Of Cognitive Psychology
History Of Cognitive PsychologyAli Hasan
 
Daniel kanheman Thinking Fast and Slow
Daniel kanheman Thinking Fast and SlowDaniel kanheman Thinking Fast and Slow
Daniel kanheman Thinking Fast and SlowRashmi Parmar
 
Cognitive Psychology and information Processing
Cognitive Psychology and information ProcessingCognitive Psychology and information Processing
Cognitive Psychology and information ProcessingQueenie Santos
 
Affect and cognition
Affect and cognitionAffect and cognition
Affect and cognitionAeda Ec
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision makingabonica
 
Research Methods in Psychology
Research Methods in PsychologyResearch Methods in Psychology
Research Methods in PsychologyJames Neill
 
Research methods in psychology
Research methods in psychologyResearch methods in psychology
Research methods in psychologyAlexisCowan
 

What's hot (20)

Chapter 1 social psychology
Chapter 1 social psychologyChapter 1 social psychology
Chapter 1 social psychology
 
Chapter 7 (states of consciousness)
Chapter 7 (states of consciousness)Chapter 7 (states of consciousness)
Chapter 7 (states of consciousness)
 
Cognitive psych ppt.
Cognitive psych ppt.Cognitive psych ppt.
Cognitive psych ppt.
 
Cognitive psychology
Cognitive psychologyCognitive psychology
Cognitive psychology
 
Perception Slides
Perception SlidesPerception Slides
Perception Slides
 
psychological perspectives
psychological perspectivespsychological perspectives
psychological perspectives
 
Reasoning & Decision Making
Reasoning & Decision MakingReasoning & Decision Making
Reasoning & Decision Making
 
Behavioural approach to abnormality
Behavioural approach to abnormalityBehavioural approach to abnormality
Behavioural approach to abnormality
 
History Of Cognitive Psychology
History Of Cognitive PsychologyHistory Of Cognitive Psychology
History Of Cognitive Psychology
 
Daniel kanheman Thinking Fast and Slow
Daniel kanheman Thinking Fast and SlowDaniel kanheman Thinking Fast and Slow
Daniel kanheman Thinking Fast and Slow
 
Tinking - PPT
Tinking - PPTTinking - PPT
Tinking - PPT
 
Social cognition
Social cognition Social cognition
Social cognition
 
Cognitive Psychology and information Processing
Cognitive Psychology and information ProcessingCognitive Psychology and information Processing
Cognitive Psychology and information Processing
 
Cognitive bias
Cognitive bias Cognitive bias
Cognitive bias
 
Perception and Illusion
Perception and IllusionPerception and Illusion
Perception and Illusion
 
Affect and cognition
Affect and cognitionAffect and cognition
Affect and cognition
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
Albert Ellis
Albert EllisAlbert Ellis
Albert Ellis
 
Research Methods in Psychology
Research Methods in PsychologyResearch Methods in Psychology
Research Methods in Psychology
 
Research methods in psychology
Research methods in psychologyResearch methods in psychology
Research methods in psychology
 

Viewers also liked

Crebus ianole rodica
Crebus   ianole rodicaCrebus   ianole rodica
Crebus ianole rodicacrebusproject
 
Fb Conference Heuristic Thinking On Market Entry Strategy
Fb Conference   Heuristic Thinking On Market Entry StrategyFb Conference   Heuristic Thinking On Market Entry Strategy
Fb Conference Heuristic Thinking On Market Entry Strategydoanhuuduc
 
Chp 12-org-behavior-decision-making
Chp 12-org-behavior-decision-makingChp 12-org-behavior-decision-making
Chp 12-org-behavior-decision-makingSudarmaji Suripto
 
Optimization Heuristics
Optimization HeuristicsOptimization Heuristics
Optimization HeuristicsKausal Malladi
 
Decision Making in an Organization
Decision Making in an OrganizationDecision Making in an Organization
Decision Making in an Organizationed gbargaye
 
Inductive and deductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoningInductive and deductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoningAbir Chaaban
 
Decision Making In Management
Decision Making In ManagementDecision Making In Management
Decision Making In ManagementVinesh Pathak
 
Special test for dermatomes and myotomes
Special test for dermatomes and myotomesSpecial test for dermatomes and myotomes
Special test for dermatomes and myotomesTafzz Sailo
 
Presentation on leadership
Presentation on leadershipPresentation on leadership
Presentation on leadershipsd college
 
Leadership concepts and theories
Leadership concepts and theoriesLeadership concepts and theories
Leadership concepts and theoriesalaguraja76
 
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of WorkTEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of WorkVolker Hirsch
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Crebus ianole rodica
Crebus   ianole rodicaCrebus   ianole rodica
Crebus ianole rodica
 
Aerospace Organization Management #3
Aerospace Organization Management #3Aerospace Organization Management #3
Aerospace Organization Management #3
 
Fb Conference Heuristic Thinking On Market Entry Strategy
Fb Conference   Heuristic Thinking On Market Entry StrategyFb Conference   Heuristic Thinking On Market Entry Strategy
Fb Conference Heuristic Thinking On Market Entry Strategy
 
Chp 12-org-behavior-decision-making
Chp 12-org-behavior-decision-makingChp 12-org-behavior-decision-making
Chp 12-org-behavior-decision-making
 
low effort judgement
low effort judgementlow effort judgement
low effort judgement
 
high effort judgement
high effort judgementhigh effort judgement
high effort judgement
 
Optimization Heuristics
Optimization HeuristicsOptimization Heuristics
Optimization Heuristics
 
Decision making
Decision makingDecision making
Decision making
 
Decision Making in an Organization
Decision Making in an OrganizationDecision Making in an Organization
Decision Making in an Organization
 
Inductive and deductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoningInductive and deductive reasoning
Inductive and deductive reasoning
 
Decision Making In Management
Decision Making In ManagementDecision Making In Management
Decision Making In Management
 
Special test for dermatomes and myotomes
Special test for dermatomes and myotomesSpecial test for dermatomes and myotomes
Special test for dermatomes and myotomes
 
Presentation on leadership
Presentation on leadershipPresentation on leadership
Presentation on leadership
 
Leadership concepts and theories
Leadership concepts and theoriesLeadership concepts and theories
Leadership concepts and theories
 
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of WorkTEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
TEDx Manchester: AI & The Future of Work
 

Similar to 002.types of-reasoning

Perception - organizational behaviour
Perception - organizational behaviour Perception - organizational behaviour
Perception - organizational behaviour anson_kj
 
Expected utility theory, Prospect Theory, Disposition effect , Heuristics and...
Expected utility theory, Prospect Theory, Disposition effect , Heuristics and...Expected utility theory, Prospect Theory, Disposition effect , Heuristics and...
Expected utility theory, Prospect Theory, Disposition effect , Heuristics and...Rehan ali
 
Perception and individual decisionmaking
Perception and individual decisionmakingPerception and individual decisionmaking
Perception and individual decisionmakingAIMS Education
 
Chapter07
Chapter07Chapter07
Chapter07drellen
 
Scenarioplanningpsychologicalperspective 140128032626-phpapp01
Scenarioplanningpsychologicalperspective 140128032626-phpapp01Scenarioplanningpsychologicalperspective 140128032626-phpapp01
Scenarioplanningpsychologicalperspective 140128032626-phpapp01Aziz Alizadeh
 
crit_think_intro_I_08 (1).ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08 (1).pptcrit_think_intro_I_08 (1).ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08 (1).pptMargi Shah
 
crit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08.pptcrit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08.pptQaulanSadida6
 
crit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08.pptcrit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08.pptRituBawa1
 
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
An Introduction to Critical ThinkingAn Introduction to Critical Thinking
An Introduction to Critical ThinkingDamian T. Gordon
 
CriticalThinking.pdf
CriticalThinking.pdfCriticalThinking.pdf
CriticalThinking.pdfArfanSubhani
 
Shiny New Toys (and why humans like them so much)
Shiny New Toys (and why humans like them so much)Shiny New Toys (and why humans like them so much)
Shiny New Toys (and why humans like them so much)Craig Thomler
 
Choice and decision
Choice and decisionChoice and decision
Choice and decisionrajeev roy
 
Session 4 - Lectures in Leadership (Relating).pptx
Session 4 - Lectures in Leadership (Relating).pptxSession 4 - Lectures in Leadership (Relating).pptx
Session 4 - Lectures in Leadership (Relating).pptxssuserde1c26
 
Critical Thinking and Reasoning.pptx
Critical Thinking and Reasoning.pptxCritical Thinking and Reasoning.pptx
Critical Thinking and Reasoning.pptxDr. Hina Kaynat
 
Decision Making.ppt
Decision Making.pptDecision Making.ppt
Decision Making.pptLouis Britto
 

Similar to 002.types of-reasoning (20)

decision
decisiondecision
decision
 
Perception - organizational behaviour
Perception - organizational behaviour Perception - organizational behaviour
Perception - organizational behaviour
 
sixblindmen (2).pdf
sixblindmen (2).pdfsixblindmen (2).pdf
sixblindmen (2).pdf
 
Expected utility theory, Prospect Theory, Disposition effect , Heuristics and...
Expected utility theory, Prospect Theory, Disposition effect , Heuristics and...Expected utility theory, Prospect Theory, Disposition effect , Heuristics and...
Expected utility theory, Prospect Theory, Disposition effect , Heuristics and...
 
Perception and individual decisionmaking
Perception and individual decisionmakingPerception and individual decisionmaking
Perception and individual decisionmaking
 
Chapter07
Chapter07Chapter07
Chapter07
 
Ob12 ab.az.05st
Ob12 ab.az.05stOb12 ab.az.05st
Ob12 ab.az.05st
 
Scenarioplanningpsychologicalperspective 140128032626-phpapp01
Scenarioplanningpsychologicalperspective 140128032626-phpapp01Scenarioplanningpsychologicalperspective 140128032626-phpapp01
Scenarioplanningpsychologicalperspective 140128032626-phpapp01
 
crit_think_intro_I_08 (1).ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08 (1).pptcrit_think_intro_I_08 (1).ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08 (1).ppt
 
crit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08.pptcrit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
 
crit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08.pptcrit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
crit_think_intro_I_08.ppt
 
Cognitive biases
Cognitive biasesCognitive biases
Cognitive biases
 
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
An Introduction to Critical ThinkingAn Introduction to Critical Thinking
An Introduction to Critical Thinking
 
CriticalThinking.pdf
CriticalThinking.pdfCriticalThinking.pdf
CriticalThinking.pdf
 
Shiny New Toys (and why humans like them so much)
Shiny New Toys (and why humans like them so much)Shiny New Toys (and why humans like them so much)
Shiny New Toys (and why humans like them so much)
 
Choice and decision
Choice and decisionChoice and decision
Choice and decision
 
Session 4 - Lectures in Leadership (Relating).pptx
Session 4 - Lectures in Leadership (Relating).pptxSession 4 - Lectures in Leadership (Relating).pptx
Session 4 - Lectures in Leadership (Relating).pptx
 
Critical Thinking and Reasoning.pptx
Critical Thinking and Reasoning.pptxCritical Thinking and Reasoning.pptx
Critical Thinking and Reasoning.pptx
 
Organizational Behaviour
Organizational BehaviourOrganizational Behaviour
Organizational Behaviour
 
Decision Making.ppt
Decision Making.pptDecision Making.ppt
Decision Making.ppt
 

002.types of-reasoning

  • 1. Decision Making and Reasoning Chapter 12
  • 2. Outline 1. Judgment and Decision Making 1. Classical Decision Theory 2. Satisficing 3. Elimination by Aspects 4. Heuristics and Biases 2. Deductive Reasoning 1. Conditional Reasoning 3. Inductive Reasoning
  • 3. 1. Judgment and Decision Making • The goal of judgment and decision making is to select from among choices or to evaluate opportunities 1. Classical Decision Theory • Based on the assumption or rationality – People make their choices so as to maximize something of value, whatever that something may be • Mathematical models of human decision making – Too restricted, does not take into account the psychological makeup of each individual decision maker
  • 4. 1. Judgment and Decision Making 1. Classical Decision Theory • Subjective expected utility theory – The goal of human action is to seek pleasure and avoid pain; in doing so each of us uses calculations of • Subjective utility – based on the individual’s judged weightings of utility, rather than on objective criteria • Subjective probability – based on the individual’s estimates of likelihood, rather than on objective statistical computations
  • 5. 1. Judgment and Decision Making 1. Classical Decision Theory • This theory is based on the belief that people seek to reach well-reasoned decisions based on – Consideration of all possible known alternatives – Use of a maximum amount of available information – Careful weighing of costs and benefits and calculation of probability – A maximum degree of sound reasoning • However, human decision making is more complex than even this modified theory implies
  • 6. 1. Judgment and Decision Making 2. Satisficing • We humans are not entirely and boundlessly rational in making decisions • Bounded rationality – We are rational, but within limits • Satisficing – We do not consider all possible options and then carefully compute which of the entire universe of options will maximize our gains and minimize our losses – Rather, we consider options one by one, and then we select an option as soon as we find one that is satisfactory or just good enough to meet our minimum level of acceptability
  • 7. 1. Judgment and Decision Making 3. Elimination by Aspects • We sometimes use a different strategy when faced with far more alternatives than we feel that we reasonably can consider in the time we have available • Elimination by aspects – We focus on one aspect (attribute) of the various options, and we form a minimum criterion for that aspect – We then eliminate all options that do not meet that criterion
  • 8. 1. Judgment and Decision Making 4. Heuristics and Biases • Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman – People may be far more likely to make decisions based on biases and heuristics (short-cuts) than earlier decision-making research has suggested – These mental shortcuts lighten the cognitive load of making decisions, but they also allow for a much greater chance of error
  • 9. ? All the families having exactly six children in a particular city were surveyed. In 72 of the families, the exact order of births of boys and girls was GBGBBG (G girl; B boy). What is your estimate of the number of families surveyed in which the exact order of births is BGBBBB?
  • 10. 1. Judgment and Decision Making 4. Heuristics and Biases • Representativeness – When we use the heuristic of representativeness, in which we judge the probability of an uncertain event according to • (1) how obviously it is similar to or representative of the population from which it is derived • (2) the degree to which it reflects the salient features of the process by which it is generated • Example on the previous slide – First birth order is considered to be more representative of the number of females and males in the population – However, either birth order is equally likely to occur by chance
  • 11. ? Are there more words in the English language that begin with the letter R or that have R as their third letter?
  • 12. ? • Calculate in your head the answer to the following problem: 8x7x6x5x4x3x2x1
  • 13. ? • Calculate in your head the answer to the following problem: 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8
  • 14. 1. Judgment and Decision Making 4. Heuristics and Biases • Availability – We make judgments on the basis of how easily we can call to mind what we perceive as relevant instances of a phenomenon (e.g. words beginning with letter R) • Anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic – People provide a higher estimate for the first sequence than for the second because their computation for the the anchor – the first few digits multiplied by each other – renders a higher estimate from which they make an adjustment to reach a final estimate
  • 15. 1. Judgment and Decision Making 4. Heuristics and Biases • Overconfidence – And individual’s overvaluation of her or his own skills, knowledge, or judgments – People tend to overestimate the accuracy of their judgments – Example: • When people were 100% confident in their answers, they were right only 80% of the time
  • 16. 2. Deductive Reasoning • Proposition – An assertion, which may be either true of false • Premise – Propositions about which arguments are made
  • 17. 2. Deductive Reasoning 1. Conditional Reasoning • The reasoner must draw a conclusion based on an if-then proposition • Deductive validity – Does not equate with truth – You can reach deductively valid conclusions that are completely untrue with respect to the world – People are more likely mistakenly to accept an illogical argument as logical if the conclusion is factually true
  • 18. 2. Deductive Reasoning 1. Conditional Reasoning • Modus ponens – The reasoner affirms the antecedent If p then q p q • Modus tollens – The reasoner denies the consequent If p then q non q non p
  • 19. 2. Deductive Reasoning 1. Conditional Reasoning • Deductive fallacies – Denying the antecedent – Affirming the consequent • Rather then using formal inference rules, people often use pragmatic reasoning schemas
  • 20. 2. Deductive Reasoning 2. Syllogistic Reasoning • Syllogisms – Are deductive arguments that involve drawing conclusions from two premises – All syllogisms comprise a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion
  • 21. 2. Deductive Reasoning 2. Syllogistic Reasoning • Linear Syllogisms – The relationship among the terms is linear, involving a quantitative or qualitative comparison – Example • You are smarter than your best friend. • Your best friend is smarter than your roommate. • Which of you is the smartest?
  • 22. 2. Deductive Reasoning 2. Syllogistic Reasoning • Categorical Syllogisms – Comprise of two premises and a conclusion – The premises state something about the category memberships of the terms – Example: • All cognitive psychologists are pianists. • All pianists are athletes. • Therefore, all cognitive psychologists are athletes.
  • 23. 3. Inductive Reasoning • In inductive reasoning, which is based on our observations, reaching any logically certain conclusion is not possible • The most we can strive to reach is only a strong, or highly probable, conclusion • A key feature of inductive reasoning, which forms the basis of the empirical method, is that we cannot logically leap from saying, “ all observed instances to date of X are Y” to saying, “Therefore, all X are Y”; it is always possible that the next observed X will not be a Y
  • 24. 3. Inductive Reasoning • Causal inferences – How people make judgments about whether causes something else • Errors in inductive reasoning – Confirmation bias • Teachers often expect little of students when they think them low in ability – Causality based on correlational evidence alone • We fail to recognize many that many phenomena have multiple causes
  • 25. 3. Inductive Reasoning • Reasoning by analogy • Example Fire is to asbestos as water is to a. Vinyl b. Air c. Cotton d. faucet