Promising Sustainable Beef - Dr. Martin Scholten, General Director Animal/Marine Sciences, Wageningen University, from the 2016 Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef (GRSB), October 5 - 6, 2016, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
More presentations at http://trufflemedia.com/agmedia/conference/2016-global-roundtable-sustainable-beef
2. GRSB Principles
Natural Resources
People & Community
Animal Health & Welfare
Food
Efficiency & Innovation
3. GRSB 2016; breakouts
● What is the consumers commitment to sustainability?
Expecting Integrity (Trust)
● What is the business commitment to sustainability?
Building Chain of Custody (Transparency)
● How to assess the sustainability?
Non-linear, kaleidoscopic Assessments (Fair & Full)
4. GRSB 2016; breakouts
● How to practice sustainability?
Convincing Progress (Footprints, Deforestation)
● What is the NGO commitment to sustainable practices?
Critically supportive for Actions more than Words
5. Consumers Expecting Integrity
But do not buy that!
Beef is Premium ...
Margin is in Adjectives
Xxx-Free is Hype
Deforestation is a No-Go
Health is a DebateKey Note Dr. David Hughes
6. Business strives for a Chain of Custody
Field
Farm
Abattoir
Processing
Retail
Consumer
7. Best Practice requires Best Science
Fair Assessment
Full Assessment
Action Driven Assessment
• Resource & Land Use
• Animal Health & Welfare
• Local Specifications
8. Most LCA’s are too simplistic & not provocative
Linear summing up LCA’s single products
From linear considered commodity/supply chains
Addressing single topics of concern
Do not account a Globally integrated AgroFood-system
Ignores variation in Feed for Food Footprint
Do not envisage feed strategies & grazing regimes
Do not envisage optimal land use
Depends on scope and scale
9. The Wageningen Animal Sustainability Team
Maximum Production of Human Edible
Proteins per Hectare of Land without
Depletion of Productivity and Biodiversity
Imke de Boer
Marion de Vries
Corina van Middelaar
Hannah van Zanten Eddie Bokkers
10. Variation in Land Use among Systems
m2/kg edible protein
0
50
100
150
200
250
Chicken Pork Beef Milk Egg
De Vries and De Boer 2010
11. First Analysis of Systems (1)
Calf from beef herd Calf from dairy herd
28. Biologicals & Fine Chemicals
Organic Matter & Biota
Minerals & Energy
Room for Improvement: Manure = Product
Waste Management
Soil Quality
29. Room for Improvement: Freeze the Footprint
• Genotyping low methane
production for selection
• Improving feed quality and
digestibility, rumen microbes
• Improving animal health and
husbandry conditions
• Manure management: collection,
storage and utilisation
• Improving C sequestration soils
• Precision Livestock Farming
33. Enrolling Performance
Catalyse continuous Improvements
Anticipate on Trends, means Awareness of Regime Shifts
Set SDG based transition Goals and challenging Claims
Think in Systems, Circularities and Innovations
Redefine the concept of Efficiency
Build Capabilities in developing Countries
Observations based Recommendations
This review yielded lower global warming potential (GWP;on average 41% lower),acidification potential (41% lower),eutrophication potential (49% lower), energy use(23% lower) and land use (49% lower) per unit of beef for dairy-based compared with suckler-based systems. In suckler-based systems, maintaining the mother cow is the dominant contributor to all impacts, which is attributable to the low reproductive rate of cattle and the fact that all emissions are allocated to the production of beef.
Beef is produced is contrasting systems. Beef production systems can be characterized by the type of feed use.
e.g. pasture based beef production of production of beef in feedlost using a mixture of
Lower GWP (on average 28% lower),energy use (13% lower) and land use (41% lower) per unit of beef were found for concentrate-based compared with roughage-based systems, whereas no clear pattern was found for acidification and eutrophication potential. An LCA comparison of beef systems that differ in type of diet, however, is limited because current LCA methodology does not account for the competition for land between humans and animals. To enhance future food supply, grassland less suitable for crop production, therefore, might be preferred over high productive cropland for direct production of animal feed. Furthermore, studies included in our review did not include all relevant impact categories, such as loss of biodiversity or water use
We concluded that beef production from dual-purpose cows or dairy cows inseminated with beef breeds show largest potential to mitigate environmental impacts of beef. Marginal grasslands unsuitable for dairy farming may be used for production of suckler-based beef to contribute to availability and access to animal-source food.