Developing A New Approach To Soil Phosphorus Testing And Recommendations - Dr. Chad Penn, USDA-ARS, from the 2020 Conservation Tillage and Technology Conference, held March 3-4, 2020, Ada, OH, USA.
DESERT ECOSYSTEM AND ITS CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES
Dr. Chad Penn - Developing A New Approach To Soil Phosphorus Testing And Recommendations
1. Developing a New Approach
to Soil Phosphorus Testing
and Recommendations
Chad Penn
USDA Agricultural Research Service
National Soil Erosion Research
Laboratory
Jim Camberato and Matthew Wiethorn
Purdue University
2. Improving P Soil Testing and
Recommendations
• Precise P recommendations
– Increase agronomic production efficiency
– Reduce non-point losses of P
4. Empirical vs. mechanistic soil
testing and fertilizer recs
“The most commonly used tests, extract
some portion of the labile soil P pool.
However, when different soils are used,
solution P concentration, buffer capacity,
and diffusion rate may not be correlated,
therefore any one of the values would not be
correlated with predicted P uptake and the
simpler soil test would not be more reliable”
Stanley Barber: Soil Nutrient Bioavailability
5. Critical Soil P Levels
Lins, Cox, and Nicholaides, 1985. “Optimizing P
fertilization rates for soybeans grown on oxisols and
associated entisols”. SSSAJ
9 lb/acre 27 lb/acre18 lb/acre
(lb/acre)
7. Uptake of solution P by plants
• Function of solution P concentration
• Replenishment by soil solids (quantity)
• Three ways of obtaining solution P
– All three depend on root architecture,
solubility, and location of P near roots
• Root interception
• Bulk flow
• Diffusion: highly dependent on location of P!
𝐽𝑟 = 𝑣 𝑜 𝐶𝑙
8. P movement to roots: Diffusion
P
P
P
P P
P
P
PP P
P
P
Higher P
Concentration
Lower P
Concentration
Higher P
Concentration
Gradient
Dominant mechanism, but SLOW and short range
𝐽𝑟 = 𝐷𝑒 𝑏
𝜕𝐶𝑙
𝜕𝑟
9. Diffusion followed by root
uptake:
P P
P
P
P
P
P P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Plant
uptake
𝐼 𝑁 =
𝐼 𝑚𝑎𝑥 (𝐶𝑙 − 𝐶 𝑚)
𝐾 𝑚 + 𝐶𝑙 − 𝐶 𝑚
10. Overall equation describing P
uptake with P movement:
Ion
movement via
diffusion
Ion
movement via
mass flow
Root uptake
kinetics
𝐷𝑒 𝑏
𝜕𝐶𝑙
𝜕𝑟
+ 𝑣 𝑜 𝐶𝑙 =
𝐼 𝑚𝑎𝑥 (𝐶𝑙 − 𝐶 𝑚)
𝐾 𝑚 + 𝐶𝑙 − 𝐶 𝑚
Solved transient-state equation using the
Crank-Nicholson method by Dr. John
Cushman in 1980
11. Different plants require different
concentrations in solution in order
to meet the required P mass…..
“External P Requirement”
But it’s a moving target!
critical solution P
concentration
1970’s soil
scientists & me
12. We need to be multi-
dimensional
• Let’s utilize the Barber-Cushman model to
pinpoint the location of the moving target
– Mechanistic
– Mass-balance
• Consider that a finite mass of P must be taken up
for a plant to attain maximum yield
– Mass of P uptake is universal
» i.e. not a moving target
13. Soil P Requirement
• Mass of solution P uptake is universal
across soil properties
– But that required mass of P can be provided
dynamically at different solution concentrations
– Example: 550 mg P/corn plant over 120 days
0.8 mg P/L
Soil bound-P Solution-P
19
times/day
0.2 mg P/L
76
times/day
Soil bound-P Solution-P
*depends on root
surface area
14. Soil P Requirement
• So how much soil-bound P do we
need?
–It depends on the ability of the soil to
supply the solution P
• Quantity-Intensity relationship
– Soil properties: mineralogy, texture, OM, pH,
etc.
– Total P content and P forms
–Also depends on physical location of P
and ability to move (diffusion)
15. Current fertilizer
recommendations
• Based on results from soil test
– 0 to 6 inches
• Not representative of No-till conditions
– i.e. P location
• No consideration for soil type or conditions
• Crop varieties?
16. P mass
requirement for
max yield
Soil
extractable P
requirement
Crop type
(cultivar?)
Quantity/Intensity
Fertilizer/soil-P
relationship
Soil
properties
Fertilizer rate
recommendation
P location and
movement
Soil properties and
management
Buffered
solution P
requirement
Empirical
17. At the end of the day….
• The plant demands a finite mass of P to
be taken up by the roots, to reach max
grain yield
• Question: based on the specific conditions
and management of that soil, what
concentration of Soil Test P is necessary
to meet the mass demand of the plant?
18. Current P Recommendations
• Not bad
• Get us in the ballpark
– Not precise
– Lots of room for improvement
• Save $
• Improve production efficiency
• Reduce P losses
19. Long Term Goal
• Utilize and improve the Barber-Cushman
model for developing more precise and
condition-specific fertility recommendations
– Required P mass for various cultivars
– Plant uptake kinetics curves
– Incorporate root modelling
• Continue to use STP extractants, but vary
the optimum level depending on soils, crop,
and conditions
20. Required P uptake mass and P
utilization efficiency: sand culture
hydroponics
Supply all non-P nutrients at adequate concentrations
• Add P at a range of concentrations
• Determine the minimum mass of P uptake at
maximum yield
• Compare cultivars
22. Corn Results
• No significant interaction between P
treatment and variety for yield components
• Increased P significantly increased yield and
growth to a point
• At max yield, P use efficiency was similar
among varieties
– But, in approaching max yield, Dekalb < Dyna-
grow < Pioneer
• Differences in overall production:
– Max grain yield and total biomass: Dekalb <
Dyna-grow < Pioneer
23. After 0.55 to 0.63 g
P uptake, no further
increase in grain
yield
But total biomass
continues to
increase until
uptake of ~ 0.8 g
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Grainyieldperplant(g)
P uptake per plant (g)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6
Totalbiomassperplant
(g)
P uptake per plant (g)
Luxury Consumption
24. P distribution in plant
30 50 55 90 94 158
19 47 56
164 216
315
13 34 44
79
87
119
236 436 536
577 591
591
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
298 566 690 909 987 1183
%massofnutrient
Total P uptake (mg)
values on bar indicate uptake mass in mg
Grain
Roots
Stem Cobb Tassel
Leaves Husk
27. P uptake vs. yield: Avg across
varieties
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Grainyieldperplant(g)
P uptake per plant (g)
Experiment Data
28. P uptake vs. yield: Avg across
varieties
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Grainyieldperplant(g)
P uptake per plant (g)
Experiment Data
Lin-Plat
Lin-Lin
29.
30. Conclusion
• Easy part is done:
– We need to get around 0.6 g of P into a corn
plant to reach max yield
• Beyond that is luxury consumption and “quality”
• Hard part is next: what is the target soil P
level?
– It depends…….moving target
33. Improved soil quality does not
“make” more P
• P obviously cannot be fixed like N
• “Humus Theory”
– Plant nutrients assimilated by the vis vitalis
• “Gleiches kann nur aus Gleichem entstehen”
• Soil health can only improve P accessibility,
but that does not defeat the mass
requirement
• Deeper roots
• This will help, but consider P is very low below 15 cm
– Subsoil P is even less for no-till due to stratification
34. Improved soil quality does not
“make” more P
• Organisms
– Free-living rhizosphere microorganisms
• Mostly negligible effect compared to sterile soils
• Can possibly reduce P availability
• Amount of P in microbial biomass in rhizosphere is
less than 3% of daily requirement
– VA mycorrhizae
• Effectively increases root surface area
• But, it accesses same soluble P pool as the roots
– Thus, this can be accounted for in Barber-Cushman model
• Changes to Q/I relationship
– For better or for worse?
35. “I don’t need to fertilize with P
anymore”
• You can get away with this for a few years
– Due to the nature of P
• Highly buffered by the soil
• But eventually, the soil bound P (quantity)
is mined to the point where it can no longer
supply a sufficient concentration of solution
P (intensity) to meet the P mass demand
– Or at a sufficient speed
• Remember that the plant takes up a finite
amount of P from soil that must be replaced