Jeff Eichmann Criminal Case

Jeff Eichmann Criminal Case
The trial of Adolf Eichmann took place in Jerusalem, Israel, after Eichmann was found and captured
in Argentina by several Jews and other survivors of the Holocaust. Eichmann's identity at the time,
Lothar Hermann, was discovered in 1953 when Simon Wiesenthal received a letter stating that
Eichmann had been seen in Buenos Aires. Israeli Prime Minister David Ben–Gurion decided that
Eichmann must be captured rather than extradited, and brought to Israel for trial. Eichmann was
captured near his home in Buenos Aires on May 11, 1960, where he was taken to a police station in
Yagur, Israel. In 1961, Eichmann was on trial in front of three judges: Moshe Landau, Benjamin
Halevi, and Yitzhak Raveh. In 1952, Mr. Hugo Black, an American politician who served as a
Democratic U.S. Senator, said for a unanimous Supreme Court, "Due process of law is satisfied
when one is present in court is convicted of crime after having been fairly apprised of the charges
against him and after a fair trial in accordance with constitutional procedural safeguards. There is
nothing in the Constitution that requires a court to permit a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Aside from these problems that were faced during the trial, the judges resorted to doctrines of
domestic criminal law to decide the novel category of crimes against humanity that were committed
over an extended period of time, in different places, and by numerous actors. The Israeli court
developed a unique interpretation of the final solution as a crime that implicated different agents in
its various stages of implementation and was able in this way to attribute responsibility to Eichmann
as a principle
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Who Is Falling In Eichmann
As seen in the following scenes right in the beginning when Hannah Arendt was at the table with her
old friend Kurt Blumenfeld just after Eichmann's had expressed he had no part with the murder of
Jews. Many Jewish people around them start expressing anger toward some of Hannah Arendt's
statements. As the camera moves around the table some Jews are stating that Eichmann is lying and
Arendt disagrees , Even Blumenfeld believes that Arendt is falling in Eichmann's trap. This scene
starts to show the radical thinking of Arendt. Later on in the movie after Arendt has wrote the the
article for the New Yorker , the hatred toward her from many jews exploded. This is expressed
strongly in the scene where the porter gives Arendt a letter "on behalf

The Strengths And Limitations Of The Eichmann Trial
The Eichmann trial reveals a lot about the strengths and limitations of the "the trial" to achieve
justice in such cases. The reason of a trial is to render justice; even the ethical of underlying
motives, as mentioned in the novel, "the making of a record of the Hitler regime which the
withstand the test of history... Nuremburg Trials, can only detract the laws main business: to weigh
the charges brought against the accused, to render judgement, and to mete out due punishment"
(253). The judgement in the Eichmann case, whose first two sections had been written in respond to
the better cause idea as it was changed into expanded both inside and outside the out room, could
not have been clearer in this respect. As proven in the novel, it states

Hannah Arendt 's Interpretation Of The Eichmann Trial
Term Paper: A Life on Trial: What Motivated Adolf Eichmann and How Have Future Generations
Understood Him? Abstract: In this term paper, I will be focussing on the contradictory reviews on
Hannah Arendt's interpretation of The Eichmann Trial. With information from her book as well as
commentary from other authors specifically David Cesarani and Deborah E. Lipstadt, I will be
focussing on arguments in relation to Eichmann's war crimes and the role he played in the mass–
murder of European Jewry. Adolf Eichmann as a man was considered to be mediocre. The
importance of understanding who he was as a person is much more than his anti–semitic values. He
was raised in northern Austria, in a middle–class household where casual anti–semitism was nothing
out of the ordinary. In 1920 Austria, Eichmann considered Jews to be acquaintances. He was
employed by Jews as an Oil and Kerosene salesman. He had Jewish relatives through marriage.
Arendt specifically analyses that Anti–semitism was not the root cause for Eichmann joining the
Nazi Party in 1932. She stresses the reason that he was a joiner. Cesarani delves deeper into
Eichmann's personal connections and issues more, he rationalised that Eichmann admired the Nazi's
position regarding the Treaty of Versailles. But he also agreed with Arendt's opinion that anti–
semitism was not the reason that led Eichmann into the Nazi Party. "Although she was wonderfully
perceptive about the structure and working of the Third Reich and Eichmann's

Eichmann In Jerusalem: Hannah Arendt
Hannah Arendt found herself at the centre of great controversy following her publication of
'Eichmann in Jerusalem' (Arendt, 1963) released one year after the end of the Eichmann trials. These
trials resulted in the execution of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi found guilty of committing various
offenses during the Second World War, namely war crimes and crimes against humanity. Eichmann's
role in the transportation and organisation of Jewish people, which resulted in countless deaths,
whilst seemingly evil to most, appeared to Arendt as proof of the banal nature of evil. She saw
Eichmann as someone who was not an anti sematic, or even as someone who delighted in murder,
but as an unthinking individual who followed orders as efficiently as possible with ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Specially delegated prisoners (titled Kapos) were in charge of overseeing everyday operations of the
camp thus minimising the contact S.S. guards had with their prisoners. Whilst all death–camps
differed greatly, many followed a similar daily routine of awakening, role–call, work, evening role–
call and bedtime. Work often involved repetitive, pointless tasks such as carrying rocks from one
place to another however; some prisoners played a role in the running of the camp. Besides the
Kapos, prisoners may have been placed into kitchens, factories and crematoriums to cook,
manufacture and clean respectively. The formation of routine not only made the death–camps run
with deadly efficiency but also created a sense of normality to the S.S guards and Kapos. The
formation of a habit begins when an action is repeated often enough that it is no longer given great
or any thought. To guards working at these camps, the routine beating, murder and mistreatment of
prisoners would have become mundane to them, which may explain why so many guards were able
to commit the most heinous of crimes against their prisoners without recognising their actions as

The Diary Of Anne Frank
Anne Frank and Hannah Arendt are two prominent female names that arise when one thinks of the
Holocaust. Each of these Jewish woman had a very unique experience during this grim time, one a
bright–eyed, young girl who was forced to go into hiding, the other a philosopher that managed to
escape. However each pondered the workings of the brutality going on around her, and put it into
words. Frank and Arendt each discuss their views on human nature in the face of the Holocaust in
their works. In this paper, I intend to discuss each woman's view, and then discuss how such a
similar viewpoint can be supported in two very different ways.
The Diary of Anne Frank is a personal work written by the young Anne Frank herself. The book is
not a work of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Yet I keep them, because in spite of everything I still believe that people are really good at heart
(278)."
Frank's reasoning for her point of view does not come with any sort of logical rationalization or in–
depth analysis. Her explanation is as follows, "I simply can't build up my hopes on a foundation
consisting of confusion, misery, and death.... I can feel the sufferings of millions and yet, if I look up
into the heavens, I think that it will all come right, that this cruelty too will end, and that peace and
tranquility will return again. In the meantime, I must uphold my ideals, for perhaps the time will
come when I shall be able to carry them out (279)." Frank's beliefs simply stem from her
wholehearted faith in the goodness of humanity, hopefulness for the future, and confidence in her
God. There is no deeper thinking to her viewpoint, it is purely based off of a blind hope.
While philosopher and author of the book Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil,
Hannah Arendt would agree with Frank that human nature is not evil, she would certainly criticize
for her lack of reasoning to back up her beliefs. In fact, Arendt's book revolves around careful
explanation of her views about Adolph Eichmann, a man who was significantly involved in the
deportation process of the Jewish people to the concentration camps during the Holocaust. After
attending his trial in

Compare And Contrast Eichmann And The Holocaust
A man named Adolf Eichmann was one of the major organisers during the holocaust, which was
mainly responsible for "the final solution" regarding the eradication of the Jews. By the end of the
war, Eichmann had been caught and arrested for the crimes he was accused of committing.
However, he argues that he had done nothing wrong and was only following his duties as well as
obeying the law as a law–abiding citizen. This is where Hannah Arendt, a leading political thinker in
the 20th century had focused on the evils of bureaucracy. Questioning on how one could do what is
considered to be "evil" but is believed to be right without repulsion or hesitation. Firstly, Arendt
considers Eichmann of being a "nobody" and he is only a result of a thoughtless man incapable of
think, rather than an evil monster. It was his inabilities to think that had resulted in the genocide, and
this had brought him the attentions of being a heartless man. During the trial, he showed no
emotions of sympathy towards the killings of the victims; however, he displayed annoyance ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Radical evil is apparent in totalitarian states since people had foolishly lost the very gift of what
makes us human, which is the ability to be able to think and reflect. Totalitarianism leads people to
stop thinking, as it is a form of manipulation of one to believe of its necessity and pervasiveness in
an organized bureaucracy (Arendt, 1963). Relating to terrorism of the Paris shooting, the terrorist's
have seemed to be manipulated and delusional of righteous thoughts to be superior to others when in
reality it is unnecessarily cruel. Similarly concerning with Eichmann's crimes, Arendt had learnt a
sad truth that evil is done by those who never constructed the mind to reconsider of others and
values but rather of rigid thoughts and absence of righteous

Adolf Eichmann And The Holocaust
The holocaust was a genocide of approximately 6 million Jewish people throughout Germany and
German occupied territories. It was committed by the Nazi party of Germany and took place from
1941 to 1945. Many people have been blamed for the atrocities that took place but there a handful of
people who were able to orchestrate this systematic mass murder. Adolf Eichmann was a high
ranking S.S. official who was infamously known as 'the logistical mind behind Hitler's final
solution' he was in charge of moving Jews from the ghettos from which they had been placed and
transporting them to extermination camps or to be deported. In his early life Eichmann was teased
for his appearance, such as his darker skin colour, classmates would often call ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
He grew up in a Jewish family and studied Judaism In his early life. Growing up in Romania during
the 1930's and 40's, Elie witnessed the injustices towards the people of his community and the
events leading up to forced deportation of Romanian Jews into concentration camps. In March of
1944, German troops occupied Sighet and made it mandatory that Jews wear the yellow Star of
David to identify them. By May, Nazis began enforcing that Jews be deported into Poland and sent
to the death camps. At only 15, Wiesel and his entire family were sent to Auschwitz. Upon arrival at
the camp, Wiesel and his father were deemed eligible for forced labour, while his mother and sister
were sent to the gas chambers. Wiesel describes how he watched his father die at the hands of the
conditions within the camp. He contracted dysentery and was often beat by S.S. officers. His father
was later sent to the crematorium within the camps just under a month before the camp was
liberated. Wiesel has spoken of what he remembers of the camp, often referring to the ramped mal
nutrition that plagued the camp and the constant smell of death that loomed in the air. He went on to
write a memoir called 'Night' which recounts his time at Auschwitz. "Never shall I forget that night,
the first night in camp, which has turned my life into one long night, seven times cursed and seven
times sealed. Never shall I forget that smoke. Never shall I forget the little faces of

Banality of Evil and Adolf Eichmann Essay
"It was as though in those last minutes he was summing up the lesson that this long course in human
wickedness had taught us––the lesson of the fearsome, the word–and–thought–defying banality of
evil" (252).
The capture and trial of Adolf Eichmann, which evoked legal and moral controversy across all
nations, ended in his hanging over four decades ago. The verdict dealing with Eichmann's
involvement with the Final Solution has never been in question; this aspect was an open–and–shut
case which was put to death with Eichmann in 1962. The deliberation surrounding the issues of
Eichmann's motives, however, are still in question, bringing forth in–depth analyses of the aspects of
evil.
Using Adolf Eichmann as a subject and poster–boy ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"The sort of person that Eichmann appeared to be did not square either with the deeds for which he
was being tried or with the traditional preconceptions about the kind of person who does evil"
(Geddes). Throughout the trial, Arendt is conflicted by what she wants to seen when she analyzes
Eichmann, and struggles greatly when she finds he does not embody the crude and inhumane
thoughts she associated with the history of the Holocaust. It is this absence of the profound hatred of
Jews, along with the normalcy he possesses, that creates the emblematic role of banal evil for Adolf
Eichmann.
A man who does not seem to be filled with rage, Eichmann can not been depicted as a satanic
monster, clearly separate from citizens who fall under terms such as normal or sane. In fact, he was
a man who's goals were similar to all working class people. Eichmann's desires to be an idealist and
a successful businessman may draw sympathy, even though it is clearly taboo to consider someone
normal if capable of participating in a genocide.
Studying Eichmann's relationships with Jews previous to his involvement in the Final Solution
become counterintuitive when looking for any sign of hatred he embodied toward the Jewish
culture. "It is obvious there is no case of insane hatred of Jews, of fanatical anti–Semitism or
indoctrination of any kind" (26). Furthermore, he was related to Jews, as his mother had Jewish
relatives.

Adolf Eichmann Trial Summary
When individuals are being instructed, when the instructions come from someone of a higher
authority they are usually acted upon. In the study of the trial of Adolf Eichmann one can clearly see
this concept being demonstarated. Since Hitler was an authority figure over Adolf , he therefore
listened to everything he was told to do. Adolf listened to Hitler whether what he was instructed to
do was morally wrong or went against his better judgement. When it came to taking instructions
Eichmann simply followed through because he was being told to do it from a person of authority.
Eichmann was thoughtless in his actions, which is said to lead to evil because it does not allow is to
see things from others perspectives ( ). In relation to the trial

Hannah Arendt on the Banality of Evil
Hannah Arendt is a German Jewish philosopher, born in 1906 and died in 1975. She studied
philosophy with Martin Heidegger as Professor. Her works deal with the nature of power and
political subjects such as democracy, authority, and totalitarianism. She flew away to France in
1933, when Adolf Hitler became Chancellor in Germany. She flew away from Europe to the United
States after escaping from the concentration camp of Gurs. She became a Professor in New York
city, in which she became an active member of the German Jewish community. In 1963, she was
sent to Jerusalem to report on Eichmann's trial by The New Yorker. Hannah Arendt's thoughts on
Eichmann's trial were expected to be harsh, considering the philosopher's roots. However, her ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This complete absence of thinking is what attracted the philosopher's interest and that is how she
started to question the problem of the eventual inner connection between the ability or inability to
think and the problem of evil. Hannah Arendt elaborated on the notion of banality of evil through
the case of Eichmann. She argues in Eichmann in Jerusalem that Eichmann, far from being a
monster, was nothing less than a thoughtless bureaucrat, passionate only in his desire to please his
superiors. She describes him in these words: "the unthinking functionary capable of enormous evil"
who revealed "the dark potential of modern bureaucratic men". According to Hannah Arendt, evil
would not come from wicked individuals, but from the "nobodies", from those who do not have the
ability to think, and thus cannot tell what is wrong and what is right. As she was influenced by the
sociologist Max Weber, who wrote concerning bureaucracies that "It is horrible to think that the
world could one day be filled with nothing but those little cogs, little men clinging to their jobs and
striving towards bigger ones", she elaborates on the danger of bureaucracy and its possible
responsibility when it comes to evil. Bureaucracies assign very specific tasks to each individual and
these specific tasks cannot be seen as right or wrong by the ones accomplishing them, it is when
they are all together that they can be examined this way. Eichmann was simply obeying the rules,

Reaction Paper On Hannah Arendt
Hannah Arendt is a 2013 bio–pic directed by Margarethe von Trotta; about an important episode
form the life of German–Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt (1906–1975) who was one of the most
influential political theorists of the twentieth century. She was born in a German–Jewish family and
was forced to leave Germany in 1933. Actress Barbara Sukowa plays the role of Arendt as a
complicated woman, who is a brilliant philosopher and also stubborn at times. This film revolves
around Hannah's controversial stand during the trial of ex–Nazi Adolf Eichmann, while she offered
to report hearing for the New Yorker in 1961. This film was able to make an impression on
audiences worldwide and won few awards as best feature film (2013, German film awards) ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Her main focus was to comprehend this new category of evil which is committed by thousands of
common people without intellect but who are excellent followers, much like robots. Also she never
once disagreed that not every Nazi involved in the holocaust was banal. Some of them were acting
out of pure hate and projecting it on the Jews (Adorno, projection theory). Of course, there were
exceptions like Oscar Schindler who had his own ideology unlike Eichmann who was part of the
process whereby ugly, degrading, murderous, and unspeakable acts become routine and are accepted
as normal. Hannah willingly engaged in the path of enlightenment knowing the bitter consequences
she might face. Although Arendt started Eichmann in Jerusalem as a trial report, it became a literary
masterpiece and still influences the intellectual community all over the

How Does Eichmann Play In The Manifestation Of The Holocaust
Hannah Arendt controversially discussed how banality, ordinariness and everyday life played an
important role in the manifestation of the holocaust in her book Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963). In
1961 Arendt reported on Eichmann's trial in Israel for the New Yorker. Eichmann was a primary
organiser of the holocaust and was tried for 15 charges, including crimes against humanity and the
Jewish people. Arendt observed that Eichmann himself was not an impressive monster or some
Cartesian Evil Genius one would expect to be responsible the murder of millions of people, in fact
she described him as completely ordinary. Not only was he physically unimpressive, but he was
declared psychologically to be completely normal by six psychologists. Arendt even believed that
despite being a Nazi Schutzstaffel (SS), he was not even a fanatic. She explained that Eichmann
simply craved inclusion, and joined the SS for this reason as opposed to sharing their extreme views.
The trial attributed mass genocide to Eichmann alone and concentrated on the doer as opposed to the
victims, creating a preconception of a diabolical monster, which Eichmann struggled to live up to.
Arendt describes Eichmann as a clown, this is a difficult concept to grasp and feels almost
disrespectful to attribute such mass death and suffering to a clown of a man. ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
This may be one factor contributing to some of the rejection that her theories faced as well as the
frightening possibility that atrocities like genocide are manifested with the help of ordinary,
everyday people, and not metaphysical

Adolf Eichmann: The Existential Failure
In her report of Nazi SS member Adolph Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem, first published as a series of
articles in The New Yorker, Hannah Arendt managed to spark great controversy, both in the
academy and among the general public. The primary attack on Arendt was that she seemed to
"blame the victim", in this case the Jews, for their role in their own extermination during the
Holocaust. While by no means the focus of her book, this perceived accusation in combination with
her portrayal of Eichmann as an apparently sane, ordinary man made readers uncomfortable at best
and at worst vindictive and unforgiving in their critique. In assuming the objective, detached role
she did, she risked ostracizing herself from both friends and colleagues as ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
(106) Eichmann makes such claims of being victimized, stating he stopped being the "master of his
own deeds" (136), and became the "victim of a fallacy." (248) In this way, he also denies that he is
free. The greatest human freedom is the ability to choose one's attitude and one's actions, which
Eichmann relinquished by asserting that he lacked a choice, and therefore carried no burden of
responsibility. Bound to the notions of responsibility and freedom is that of individuality, or the
ability to think for oneself. Accepting responsibility relies on acknowledgement that one is an
individual. Inability to think for oneself allows for the incorrect belief, which Eichmann possessed,
that responsibility can be thrust onto others. In passing the responsibility of one's actions to another,
one gives up the power to create one's essence and define who one is. This is the cowardly way out
and the result is a failure to realize one's humanity, as there is no real way to run from responsibility
and no real scapegoat. Our actions allow us to define who we are, or what our essence will be. It
follows, then, that by obeying orders and acting out another's will we are allowing them to tell us
who we are, and impose meaning onto our lives that ought to be created subjectively. Eichmann
lived his life always as a "joiner" of some group or another, with the distressing idea of doing
otherwise largely influencing his continued

Critical Analysis Of Eichmann In Jerusalem By Hannah Arendt
According to Hannah Arendt, the author of Eichmann in Jerusalem, the ability to think for oneself is
having internal dialogue about one's actions(contemplation). Now, in my opinion, being able to
think for oneself is a moral requirement, and actions should not be judged immoral if free thought is
absent. Moreover, I analyze the case of Eichmann with the interpretation that moral requirement
may relate to good or bad actions. Furthermore, there are many difficult situations in which someone
may not have the option to think for themselves. For example, in the case of someone who is
cognitively impaired, or possesses a low IQ, the law tends to be lenient with punishments, and most
are placed into rehabilitation instead of facing severe consequences. Thus, if a person is mentally ill,
or cognitively not present to understand what they did was wrong, then society does not consider
them as immoral beings. Therefore, it is logical to conclude that a person must be able to effectively
control their own thoughts, or even actions, in order for them to be deemed moral or immoral.
Restrictions on someone's ability to maintain their own thoughts include indoctrination, a
commanding moral authority(God), and/or an intense circumstances. An example that includes two
of those three is the Biblical story of Abraham's binding of his son Isaac. In the story, Abraham
manifests an inability to think for himself due to the overpowering command of God to sacrifice his
son, Isaac, as an offering.

Israel Vs Eichmann Case Study
Zachary Schaffer International Law Squib #2 Attorney–General of the Government of Israel v.
Eichmann Facts: Adolf Eichmann was abducted from Argentina to be tried in Israel under the Nazi
Collaborators Law. He was charged with "crimes against the Jewish people, crimes against
humanity and war crimes..." (Dunoff, Ratner, Wippman, PG 300). His intention was to avoid being
tried due to the State of Israel being outside of its jurisdiction when he was kidnaped. Issue: The
legal issue involves the kidnapping by agents of the State of Israel to bring a war criminal back to
the State to be tried for his crimes. A further issue is the violation of the sovereignty of the Argentine
Republic Holding: Israel and Argentina "closed" the incident without reparations above recognition
of the violation of sovereignty. The fact that the crimes in question against ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The legality of Eichmann's trial against the state of Israel is separate from the possible illegality of
the means in which he was brought their. In this case, any international violations committed were
rectified by a joint decision by the Argentinian and Israeli government. The international tort that
may have been committed by the State of Israel was thus rendered insignificant. During his appeal,
Eichmann argued that there was no ground for him to be tried for crimes that were 'Acts of the
State': "This ground of appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court as there is no basis for applying
the doctrine to acts prohibited by international law, particularly in cases of such heinous
international crimes. This was affirmed by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg..."'
(http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/185/Eichmann) After the appellate and
subsequent Supreme Court decisions, Eichmann were convicted of all fifteen counts brought before
him and sentenced to death by

Adolf Eichmann Research Paper
Adolf Eichmann. War Criminal, Mass murderer, Organizer of the notorious Death Camp Trains and
the Final Solution. This man was many things, but he was also once a child. This is the story of
young life, adulthood, and the infamous trial of Otto Adolf Eichmann, otherwise known as Richard
Klement. Eichmann's young life was quite ordinary, he was born on the 19th of March in 1906, in
Solingen, in the Rhine province of Germany. He was born under the name Otto Adolf Eichmann.
His Father, Adolf Karl Eichmann Senior, and his mother, Maria Nee Schefferling, were both
protestant. Around the time he was 8 he and his family moved to Lintz, Austria. When Adolf
Eichmann was 10 years old his mother died, but soon after his Father remarried and he had 4 ...
This advice would eventually help him become the aptly nicknamed "Jewish Specialist" of the S.S,
after months of military training and being promoted to SS–Scharführer (Sergeant) he was
transferred to the main office of security, Sicherheitsdienst (SD)–Hauptamt in 1934. His job was
mainly the monitoring of Zionist organizations (Jewish people who believed in the reuniting of the
Jewish Holy land of Israel.) Eichmann mostly negotiated with the organization and inspected
Palestine under the false belief that he would help them settle the holy land or as he called it,
"Zionist emigration of Jews from Germany by all [available] means" (USHMM.Org, Unknown
Author) During the Anschluss (Annexation of Austria), he performed a small raid on a Jewish
Community office. After the Annexation he played a pivotal role in the setting up of The Central
Office for Jewish Emigration in Vienna, the Office opened on August 20th, 1938. The Office
supposedly emigrated over 110,000 Austrian jews from August 1939 to June 1939 and was
successful that it was used as a basis for other deportation offices, the method was coined "The
Vienna Model" because the office was based in Vienna. In October of 1939 Eichmann was put in
charge of the central office, although he was less successful during his first attempt, but led the
propaganda against Czech

How Did Adolf Eichmann Contribute To The Holocaust?
Adolf Eichmann was born in Solingen, Germany in 1906. Adolf was one of the most important
contributors to the Holocaust and the deportation of the collecting of European Jews during the
Holocaust. As a teen Adolf moved to Linz, Austria with his family, where he completed his
schooling and started training for mechanical engineering. Adolf moved from job to job as a day
labourer, a salesman for a vacuum oil company and a office worker.
At the age of 26 Adolf Eichmann joined the Austrian Nazi Party. Nazi's fled to Bavaria after their
party was banned in Austria which became the Austrian Legion later. Adolf later joined the SS and
then served as a corporal member of the SS at Dachau concentration camp. Nazi terrorists got
financial, logistic and material support from Germany. He studied all aspects of Jewish lifestyles and
attended Jewish meetings and later became known as a 'Jewish specialist'. Adolf was then assigned
to investigate possible solutions to the 'Jewish solution' which was to find out ways to treat the Jews.
Adolf was the main person behind moving jewish people out of their homes and into ghettos, by
cramming thousands of people onto trains and into cars and trucks Adolf sent millions of Jews to
their death. He wanted to move the Jews out and torture them by putting them into concentration
camps
Ghettos were chosen based on how the Nazi's wanted to get rid of the Jews. Later, the leader
(führer) had ordered that the Jews would be "physically exterminated".

Guided Inquiry : The Nature Of Evil
Guided Inquiry: The Nature of Evil
My Inquiry:
"To what extent is Adolf Eichmann just a bureaucratic businessman doing his job, or were his
motivations composed of pure evil and murderous intent?"
'Is Eichmann a rotten, soiled and evil man, and were his motivations boring, mundane and obvious?'
Why did Eichmann kill so many Jews if he 'supposedly' no real hate or motivation to do it?
Reading 1
"Adolf Eichmann went to the gallows with great dignity. He had asked for a bottle of red wine and
had drunk half of it. He refused the help of the Protestant minister the Reverend William Hull who
offered to read the Bible with him: he had only two more hours to live and therefore no "time to
waste." He walked the fifty yards from his cell to the execution chamber calm and erect with his
hands bound behind him. When the guards tied his ankles and knees he asked them to loosen the
bonds so that he could stand straight. "I don't need that " he said when the black hood was offered
him. He was in complete command of himself nay he was more: he was completely himself.
Nothing could have demonstrated this more convincingly than the grotesque silliness of his last
words. He began by stating emphatically that he was a Gottgläubiger to express in common Nazi
fashion that he was no Christian and did not believe in life after death. He then proceeded: "After a
short while gentlemen we shall all meet again. Such is the fate of all men. Long live Germany long
live Argentina long live Austria. I

The Milgram Experiment
The banality of evil expression was coined by Hannah Arendt (1906–1975), German political
theory, in her book Eichmann in Jerusalem, whose subtitle is a report on the banality of evil. In
1961, in Israel, Adolf Eichmann 's trial for genocide against the Jewish people during World War
begins. The trial was involved in a controversy and many disputes. Almost all the world's
newspapers sent reporters to cover the sessions, which were made publicly by the Israeli
government. In addition to crimes against the Jewish people, Eichmann was charged with crimes
against humanity and belonging to a group organized criminal purposes. Eichmann was convicted of
these crimes and hanged in 1962, near Tel Aviv. One of the correspondents present at the trial, ...
If today there were new concentration camps, dominated by the figure of a tyrant or other forms of
authoritarianism, there would be more than 75 % of citizens, at least only in the US, they would be
willing to join the staff thereof and punish other human beings. The Milgram experiment is strong
evidence in supporting Arendt's point, which is that someone like Eichmann was just following
orders and had nothing to do with Anti–Semitism. These people who went through the experiment
without knowing the ethnical background of whoever was in the other room so it them continuing
with the shocks had nothing to do with ethnicity. Most of these people went along through the
experiment the whole way knowing they were harming the life of someone else but luckily in reality
they were not. Eichmann was still not the perfect man because following orders or not it goes
against morals values but there is a sense of where he is coming from and where Arendt's argument
is coming from. Eichmann and Arendt claim it was about obedience over Anti–Semitism and the law
over

Arendt Eichmann and Anti-Semitism
Arendt, Eichmann and Anti–Semitism Introduction: The Holocaust invokes a great many emotions
based on the scale of the atrocities committed and the degree of hatred that both allowed them to
occur and that remained embedded in world culture thereafter. This is why the trial of Adolph
Eichmann, which laid out the extent of crimes committed by the Nazis and which levied them
against the alleged architect of the Final Solution, would promote so much debate. In spite of the
obviation that the Jewish people had a right to seek justice for the roughly six million that perished
in European concentration camps, the use of Eichmann as an avatar and the nature of the trials
themselves would invoke criticism. The most noted of this criticism is that offered by Hannah
Arendt's 1963 examination, Eichmann in Jerusalem: The Banality of Evil. Discussion: The text is
noted for its sharp criticism of the tactics used to embody the whole of the Nazi party's crimes in the
form of one seemingly meek bureaucrat. However, the text is also the subject of considerable
criticism itself for a tone that seems both to minimize the Jewish suffering in the Holocaust and to
purposively gloss over the truly determinant role played by Eichmann in the implementation of the
Final Solution. Indeed, though Arendt is highly critical of the tribunal, she does recognize in quoting
the prosecution in the trial that Eichmann had not only escaped judgment by evading the Nuremberg
Trials implemented by Allied

Adolf Eichmann I-Search
Adam McShane May 4, 2011 Honors American Lit. Adolf Eichmann I–SEARCH Adolf Eichmann
The Holocaust, an event in the 1930 's and 40 's that changed the world greatly. It was responsible
for the killing of 6 million European Jews. Many people think Adolf Hitler was the evil man who
was in charge of the ruthless genocide of these people. However, he is not. Adolf Eichmann is the
man responsible for creating the "Final Solution" the plan to extreminate the Jewish race. I had
many questions while thinking how I should go about writing this I–SEARCH paper. When I began
writing this paper, I knew nothing about Adolf Eichmann. Doing the paper on him was a mere
suggestion from my father. I quickly learned that he worked his way ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Germany occupied 16 countries at this time. This made Eichmann one of the most powerful men in
the Third Reich. His office was the headquarters for creating all ghettos, transportation , death
camps, and killing techniques of the Jews [ (Wistrich) ]. At the beginning of World War II, many SS
officials began murdering aristocracy, professionals, clergy, political commissars, suspected
saboteurs, Jewish males and anyone deemed a security threat (The History Place). This marked the
beginning of the senseless killing of European Jewry. Adolf Eichmann began planning ways to get
rid of the Jewish race. One of his earlier plans was presented in July of 1940. He proposed that all of
the Jews should be deported to Madagascar. However, the plan was never implemented. In poland
there were 3.5 million Jews. They were all gathered into small ghettos such as Warsaw (The History
Place). Warsaw was one of the biggest and overcrowded ghettos in Poland. In 1941 Eichmann was
deporting Jews out of Germany and Bohemia, in accordance with Hitler 's orders to make the Third
Reich free of Jews as quickly as possible (Wistrich). The ghettos were chosen based on how close
they were to railway junctions, which was preparing them to implement their final goal. The
Wannsee Conference happened on January 20, 1942 in Berlin. Fifteen men, including SS officers,
lawyers, Heydrich Himmler, and Adolf Eichmann had a

Emotion and Memory of the Holocaust Essay
In the aftermath of the Jewish Holocaust, an outpouring of eyewitness accounts by both survivors
and perpetrators has surfaced as historical evidence. For many, this has determined what modern
popular culture remembers about this atrocious event. Emotion obviously plays a vital role in the
accounts of the survivors, yet can it be considered when discussing the historical significance of the
murder of six million European Jews by the Third Reich? Emotion is the expression of thoughts and
beliefs affected by feeling and sensibility of an individual regarding a certain event or individual. In
terms of the Holocaust, emotion is overwhelmingly prevalent in the survivors' tales of their
experiences, conveyed in terms of life, death, and ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
She writes that "the 'distortion' related to memory...is not so much of facts or interpretations, but a
distortion from the lack of congruity between personal experience and expectation...and the
institutional representation of the past on the other" (Crane, 1). At some point, scholars must
interpret a filtered account of the survivor's tale, searching through the layers of important facts and
emotional embellishments, and find the most important knowledge buried deep within. Yet how may
one distinguish fact from emotion? Famed Holocaust historian James Young, in his 1997 work
"Toward a Received History of the Holocaust," asks:
Is it possible to write a history that includes some oblique reference to such deep memory, but which
leaves it essentially intact, untouched and thereby deep? In this section, I suggest, after Patrick
Hutton, that 'What is at issue here is not how history can recover memory, but, rather, what memory
will bequeath to history' (Young, 1)
Clearly, this is an issue with which scholars have struggled to deal for years, however this paper will
show that it is quite possible to distiniguish the two sides.
The methodological approach undertaken in this paper confronts each account as one in which
memory and fact have merged together, through which even

Why Is Adolf Eichmann Important
The life of Adolf Eichmann Have you ever wondered why Adolf Eichmann is so important? Adolf
Eichmann is very important because he was a Jew and he had escaped the camp where all the Jews
were kept. He didn't go very far, he had to live a low life and he couldn't tell anybody what he was
going through. He ended up getting caught and was put in jail for all of his crimes that he committed
and he was also sentenced to death row. To begin with, Adolf Eichmann's childhood wasn't well. His
parents, Karl Adolf Eichmann were Protestants, but when Adolf was eight years old, his mom had
passed away. Adolf was mistreated by other kids, they would call him names such as, "the little
Jewish boy" because of his dark hair and completion. His father had got remarried and soon enough,
Adolf had four brothers. In 1936, Adolf had found the girl of his dreams and married Vera Libel who
was a native Bohemia, they lived in Prague and became parent to four boys. In October 1939, Adolf
was appointed to the Department of the Gestapo which is located a Berlin. Adolf had created a
Jewish organization so that way he could have leaders who would allow Zionist organizations to
operate. They had picked out sightings for ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
As the Russians were focusing on another crime and they headed towards west, Eichmann saw his
chance to escape, he had left Auschwitz and he found a disguise of a German Luftwaffe Corporal.
Adolf needed to try and fit in with the rest of the soldiers, so he decided to go with the Russians and
pretend to be one of them, a Russian came up to him to ask him who he was and he had asked for
his name, as Adolf is introducing himself, the Russian notices the SS tattoo on Adolf's arm so he
knew Adolf was not apart if their organization. The Russian confronted Adolf and he admitted that
he escaped and was not a part of their organization. The Russian took him back to custody

Hannah Arendt Motivation
Hannah Arendt has been widely recognized as both one of the most major thinkers and top political
philosophers of the 20th century. Arendt was born on October 14, 1906 in Hanover, Germany as the
only child of a middle–class Jewish–German family. She grew up in Königsberg, In 1913, her father
passed away and her mother persuaded her into strong academic studies, and it is quite evident she
did well in motivating her as Arendt's academic background is quite large. In 1933, Arendt was
arrested for having gathered information regarding the Nazi army and anti–semitism. Afterward,
Hannah Arendt, being a Jew in a city under nazi regime,was forced to flee the country and began a
new life in Paris, France. She began working with Youth Aliyah, which was an organization that
primarily helped rescue Jewish children from most of eastern Europe. In 1940, she married a
philosophy professor named Heinrich Blücher and and soon became interned at Camp Grus, and
escaped before the Germans arrived, once again on foot as a fugitive with her husband. Due to the
German invasion of France the couple alongside Arendt's mother fled France and flew over to
Portugal using illegally issued visas. Religion played a very large role in Hannah Arendt's life, but in
a completely inevitable manner. The fact that Arendt was Jewish and grew up in a city under full
nazi regime control. Hannah Arendt incorporated her idea and views of religion very delicately in
her writing which is expected of from a good

Adolf Eichmann : The Contributions Of Adolf Hitler And...
When you hear the words "World War Two," you may immediately think of the powerful Nazi
leader, Adolf Hitler. However, there was a lesser known Adolf during that time, and his last name
was Eichmann. Nevertheless, he was just as malevolent as Hitler. You may be asking yourself, "who
is Adolf Eichmann?" Adolf Eichmann was one of the world's most notorious Nazis during WWII,
and to understand this you will see how he was first introduced to the Nazi party, the plans he
conducted during the war, where he escaped to postwar, who tracked him down and caught him, his
time in captivity, the return plan, how his glory days came to an end in the Eichmann trial, and how
the world reacted to the mayhem he brought about.
Adolf Eichmann's reign began in a town called Linz, Austria in 1992 ("Adolf" para 3). Around
November of 1992, Eichmann found his way into the hands of the second most powerful man in
Germany, Heinrich Himmler, who lead one of the most powerful Nazi paramilitaries (para 4).
Eichmann soon left Linz in 1933, to join a terrorist school of the Austrian Legion in Lechfeld,
Germany (para 3). Later, Eichmann moved to Berlin, Germany, where the central office of the SS
Sicherheitsdienst "Security Service" was held (para 3). Here he dealt with Jewish affairs and
advanced steadily forward (para 3). He was then moved to another SS unit in January of 1934, at
Dachau, an old concentration camp in Germany ("Adolf" para !!!). Continuing to advance in the
ranks, he was named

Adolf Eichmann And Human Rights
Human rights are a complex notion, that theoretically should be afforded to every human being on
the planet. However, despite the notion of human rights for all, widespread human rights violations
have still occurred throughout human history. The Holocaust is a specific historical example of how
human rights violations can be widespread, and systematic. The Holocaust was the mass genocide of
the Jewish community during the second world war (O'Byrne, 2003). However, while the human
rights violations that occurred during the Holocaust were heinous and villainous, the international
response towards the perpetrators of the Holocaust, also proposed important questions regarding
human rights. The specific trial that raised human rights concerns, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
By critically examining Eichmann's trial, it is clear that the criminal proceeding was facilitated in a
way that did not ensure Eichmann's basic human right, to a trial free of bias and subjectivity. One of
the major flaws in Eichmann's trial was the trial being held in Israel, as opposed to Germany, where
the crimes were actually committed. As outlined in the Jasper reading, holding the trial in Israel, was
a strategic and political decision (Jaspers, 2006). As was discussed in lecture, the choice to hold the
trial in Israel, was made to fuel the opinion that Israel was the land where the Jewish community
was safe, despite Israel's complicity in the horrendous actions that were committed during the
Holocaust (Tasson: Course Slides (W6)). The choice to hold the trial in Israel was an unfair
decision, that was made to promote Israel's pro–Jewish perception, and put the metaphorical stake in
Eichmann's coffin (Tasson: Course Slides (W6)). The right to a fair criminal proceeding is a human
right that should be afforded to all human beings, despite the crimes they have committed. Holding a
criminal trial in a nation unrelated to the crime, is a human rights violations, due to the basic fact
that the facilitation of the trial is being used to further the nation's interest, as opposed to fairly
prosecuting the individual (Tasson: Course

Essay on Eichmann in Jerusalem
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil In her book, Eichmann in Jerusalem,
Hannah Arendt uses the life and trial of Adolf Eichmann to explore man's responsibility for evils
committed under orders or as a result of the law. Due to the fact that she believed that Eichmann was
neither anti–Semitic, nor a psychopath, Arendt was widely criticized for treating Eichmann too
sympathetically. Still, her work on the Eichmann trial is among the most respected works on the
issue to date. Eichmann built a defense during his trial by arguing that he was not responsible for his
actions because he was acting under orders and in accordance with the law of his land. Since his
orders came from Adolf Hitler himself, Eichmann ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Hannah Arendt ends her book with the phrase "The Banality of Evil." This phrase encapsulates her
belief that the great evils of mankind have not been committed by sociopaths or the criminally
insane, but rather by ordinary people who have accepted the decisions of corrupt authorities without
question. Current examples of this behavior can be found internationally, specifically when looking
at the "ethnic cleansing" policies of some African nations, but also within the United States at the
corporate level. Employees of Enron, Arthur Anderson, WorldCom and other disgraced corporations
have claimed innocence due to the fact that they only acted as they were instructed by superiors. The
most alarming thing about Arendt's book is that she is able to make a compelling case that the
greatest evils of mankind are committed by ordinary people. Her work forces one to look at the
world and realize that the Holocaust was not an isolated incident committed by blood thirsty
sociopaths. One must realize that the decision making processes that created an environment
accepting of the "Final Solution" is still alive an well today as it has been throughout history. The
weight of personal moral choice

Eichmann In Jerusalem: A Report On The Banality Of Evil
be described as an act that would be considered unethical or immoral. Evil had different meaning
back in the 1800's compared to what it means today. Even in the 1600's, almost 1700's, which was
when the witch trials began in colonial Massachusetts when more than 200 people were accused of
practicing witchcraft, the devil's magic, and 20 were executed because of these trials Lets take for
example Hannah Arendt's situation when she was listening in on Eichmann's testimony and wrote
her essay: Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. One thing Arendt certainly did
not mean was that evil had become ordinary, or that Eichmann and his Nazi cohorts had committed
an unexceptional crime. She thought the crime was exceptional, if not

An Analysis Of Hannah Arendt 's ' The Eichmann Case ' Essay
Throughout time there have been many memorable trials of this century, but there has been one case
that's been more forward in the way that international cases should be organized, in the sense of who
has the jurisdiction to try the case. The Eichmann case that Hannah Arendt discusses has many
aspects that fit in the sense that Eichmann was not given a proper trial. Arendt provides this
information by asking the questions of whether the case she is faced with should have been thought
of as solely legal or whether there was a philosophical agenda behind how the trial occurred. This
allows for a discussion on the eagerness to think of how consciousness plays in the manner that
Eichmann should have been and was judged. For this to follow through with the aspect that this case
was all about paying respect to the Jewish culture, it can be provided that the Jewish court was less
focused on setting a precedence for international crimes. If this Eichmann case was all about giving
back, then Arendt asks herself whether or not the world was so focused on giving back to the Jewish
culture that they would allow them to produce a decision in a state of wanting revenge. This again
brings up the essence that legality did not matter as much as paying respect to the millions that had
been killed during the time of the Second World War. With Arendt is viewing the misappropriation
of law, she hints that there was no real jurisdiction to how he should be tried, or even the thought of
how he

Adolf Eichmann Was The Main Man In Charge Of Planning And
Adolf Eichmann was the main man in charge of planning and transporting the Jews in World War II.
Hitler was not the only one responsible for all the devastating killings that happened, Adolf
Eichmann also contributed a lot in planning the killings that happened and transporting Jews. Born
on March 19, 1905, Eichmann was born into a middle class Protestant family. After the death of his
mother, his family moved to Austria, and he was teased for his looks and called, "The Little Jew".
When Eichmann was older, after failing his engineering studies, he worked for his father's small
mining company. A while later, he quit that job and worked for an electrical construction company.
He later quit that job too, and worked as a traveling salesman ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Eichmann soon became one of the most powerful people in the third Reich and would continue to be
head of the IV B4 until the end of the Reich. In July 1940 Eichmann proposed his Madagascar Plan
which proposed deporting Jews to the island of Madagascar. The plan was not approved and was
never implemented. Just after the start of World War II, the occupation of Poland and the Soviet
Union, SS Einsatz groups murdered anyone including the Jews that were deemed a security threat.
After Heydrich and Eichmann learned that Poland had the largest population of Jews at that time,
they had all of the Jews found and rounded up so they could be shipped to ghettos and labor camps.
In some ghettos such as Warsaw, large numbers of Jews were kept in small confinements resulting
in disease and starvation. After Heydrich told Eichmann, "The Führer has ordered the physical
extermination of the Jews (www.historyplace.com )." SS Einsatz groups in occupied areas of the
Soviet Union, who Eichmann was supervising, turned their full attention to the mass extermination
of the Jews. Einsatz leaders kept highly detailed records, and some competitions came about among
the four main groups as to who could kill the most Jews. Some methods at this time were just
shooting and burying the Jews. After the war, Otto Ohlendorf, commander of Einsatzgruppe D,
described the method, "The unit selected would enter a village or city and order the prominent
Jewish citizens to call together all Jews for the

Adolf Eichmann Argumentation Essay
You may not remember me but I asked the first question of how long you were in the concentration
camps, I am blonde and tall and I was sitting in the front row. I want you to know that taking your
time and effort to educate us is a very important thing to everyone at Medea. You talking about the
horrors of the Nazis concentration camps I expect is hard for you, but the fact that you open up what
you have inside and let all your feelings toward this topic out is amazing. I recently had my bar
mitzvah and I had the Torah portion concerning the topic Emor which included the rules and laws of
the death penalty and I included Adolf Eichmann in my speech. When you were talking about the
execution of Eichmann I knew word for word what you were talking

Essay On Eichmann
Eichmanns Beginnings In August 1933, Eichmann joined the "Austrian Legion," an association
organized in Bavaria for unemployed Nazi Party members from Austria; here Eichmann occupied in
a few months' military training. In 1934, with the rank of SS–Scharführer (Sergeant) Eichmann
joined the Security Service Main Office and still worked for this organization when it became part
of the RSHA in 1939. In the mid–1930s, Eichmann worked for SD office II–112, which had among
its objectives the supervisor of Jewish organizations. Assigned to a section dealing with Zionist
activities, Eichmann negotiated with Zionist official and made an inspection tour of Palestine in
1937; his efforts to promote a "Zionist emigration of Jews from Germany by all means" served him
well in preparing him for his ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He described Eichmann as "one of the greatest of the Nazi war criminals".Reports in Israel spoke of
a daring operation carried out by the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, to seize Eichmann from
Argentina where he had been living under an assumed identity. Adolf Eichmann was tried for crimes
against humanity. In the jailhouse writings, Eichmann, a former traveling salesman, tried to put
distance between himself and the Nazi genocide, claiming he was just a official. His only defense
was that he was "on the lowest rung," that his "position was too insignificant," and he declared
repeatedly, "I had to obey." And Eichmann conveyed no reaction to the horrors that were presented
in court. On 2 December 1961 Eichmann was sentenced to death for crimes against the Jewish
people and crimes against all mankind. On May 31, 1962, the State of Israel carried out the only
death sentence in its history on the man whose only defense was, "I was just following

The Nazi Hunters Chapter Summary
In The Nazi Hunters: How a Team of Spies and Survivors Captured the World's Most Notorious
Nazi, Neal Bascomb writes about Adolf Eichmann: a Lieutenant Colonel of the Nazi Security
Service, husband to Vera Eichmann, a father to four boys, responsible for the slaughter of five
million Jews, and the most notorious Nazi who escaped after World War II. A total of eighteen
chapters: Chapter one provides background information on Adolf Eichmann and carrying out the
plan to get rid of all Jews and on Auschwitz survivor, Zeev Sapir, chapters two through seventeen
describes the process and planning of capturing Eichmann by the Nazi Hunters, and chapter
eighteen describe the trial of Eichmann. Adolf Eichmann perfected his plan in getting rid of the
Jews. It took only four steps: step one– isolate the Jews, step two– secure the Jews' wealth, step
three– take Jews from their homes and force them to live in miserable neighborhoods, step four–
send them to concentration camps. When going through this plan in Hungary, Eichmann visited a
ghetto promising the 103 Jews that this was only temporary; they would ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Nick openly boasted about his father being a high ranked officer and shared his opinion that the
Germans should have finished their job. Later, Sylvia was able to piece the information together and
alerted her father, Lothar Hermann, that Nick's father is Adolf Eichmann. Lothar then wrote to the
German prosecutor, Fritz Bauer. From there having a lead on Eichmann was sporadic. However, the
Nazi Hunters were able to track him down; they spied on him for weeks creating an elaborate plan
to capture him in Argentina and deliver him to Israel to face his war crimes in trial. After working
out all the possible things that could go wrong they successful captured the notorious SS officer, got
him to sign a statement avoiding any legal issues with Argentina and successfully flew him to

Simon Wiesenthal 's Search For Escaped Nazis
Simon Wiesenthal, arguably the world 's most well–known Nazi–hunter, stood as a symbol to the
Nazis scattered around the world. Simon Wiesenthal 's search for escaped Nazi war criminals
consumed his life post–war as he was one of the sole seekers of justice for the victims of the
Holocaust. In the years of Wiesenthal 's life, he faced many hardships, not only in the Nazi 's labor
camps and death camps, but after the war as he pressured the world to convict those responsible for
the Holocaust. Simon Wiesenthal relentlessly sought out escaped Nazis because he felt that there
wasn 't enough being done to bring justice to the Nazi war criminals, and in general, the world
should have done more to capture the escaped Nazis instead of letting those responsible for the
Holocaust get away. On December 31, 1908, Wiesenthal was born in Buczaca, now a part of the
Ukraine ("About Simon Wiesenthal"). Young Wiesenthal, from 1928 to 1932, attended Technical
University of Prague for architecture after being turned down from Polytechnic Institute in Lvov
because of quotas on Jewish students ("About Simon Wiesenthal"). Not long after Germany and
Russia partitioned Poland, Nazis started the "Red purge of Jewish merchants, factory owners, and
other professionals"("About Simon Wiesenthal"). Wiesenthal was turned into the authorities one
day, and forced to moved out of the city not because he was a Jew but rather because he was a
capitalist (Segev 42).Wiesenthal bribed the police to let him stay

Adolph Eichmann And The Nazi Party
Adolph Eichmann was born to a Calvinist family in Solingen, Germany on March 19, 1906. Soon
after his Eichmann's family moved to Linz, Austria. In school Eichmann was involved in numerous
sporting activities, however he was known as a poor scholastic student. It is also interesting to note
that similarly to Adolph Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, and Joseph Goebbels, Eichmann physically did
not resemble the stereotypical tall, blonde, Aryan male, and due to his darker complexion, brown
hair, and brown eyes Eichmann was teased as a child and derisively called the "little Jew." As a
young man in the 1920s Eichmann never held a steady job, working as a traveling salesman, a day
laborer, and an office worker. In 1932 at the age of 26, at the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Due to his efforts and work Eichmann garnered the attention of high–ranking Nazi officer Reinhard
Heydrich. Eichmann was soon tasked by Heydrich with finding a viable solution to the "Jewish
Problem." He visited Palestine in 1937 in order investigate the plausibility of a large scale Jewish
immigration to Palestine, and even suggested the Madagascar plan, wherein the Nazi's would
institute a mass deportation of Jews to Madagascar, in order to ultimately achieve a "Judenfrei"
Europe. Ultimately, neither of these "solutions" panned out.
In 1938 following Germany's annexation of Austria, known as the Anschluss. Eichmann was
deployed to Vienna was instructed to set up an organization designed to facilitate the emigration of
Jews out of Austria. The organization was known as the "Central Office for Jewish Emigration"
(Zentralstelle für jüdische Auswanderung). According to records kept by the organization, they were
directly responsible for the emigration of approximately 110000 Austrian Jews between the
Anchluss in August of 1938 and June 1939, three months before the outbreak of the Second World
War. The upper echelon of the Nazi party were so impressed with Eichmann and his work that they
created a template known as the "Vienna Model" for other Jewish emigration organizations
throughout the Reich to follow.
In September of 1939 Nazi Germany invaded Poland and began World War II. Immediately after the
campaign began the Germans modified their policy

Analysis Of The Book ' Hannah Arendt '
In "Eichmann in Jerusalem," Hannah Arendt analyzes Adolph Eichmann while he is on trial in
Jerusalem for the crimes that he committed while being a Lieutenant Colonel in the SS during the
Nazi Regime. In the book Arendt talks about how Eichmann's actions were "banal" in the sense that
he seemed to be an ordinary person who just committed acts that were evil. Italian–Jewish Writer
Primo Levi, a Holocaust Survivor, states that SS officers like Eichmann lived in their own self–
deception that made them believe that their actions were caused by just following their orders in the
SS. In this paper, I will analyze the views that both Arendt and Levi had about the Eichmann trial
and then compare and state the differences of their views. I will then explain the reasons why both
Hannah Arendt's and Primo Levi's analysis of Adolph Eichmann that show that the actions that he
committed were all truly evil actions. I'll first talk about Hannah Arendt's analysis of the Adolph
Eichmann and also talk about how his motives for committing the crimes were a "banality of evil".
Viewing the trial first hand, Arendt bases her analysis of Eichmann of the criminal charges that he is
indicted on, his motives for the crimes, and how he tried to defend himself during the trial. The way
that Arendt perceives Eichmann is by the fact that he was aware of the seriousness of the crimes that
he committed at the trial, but he did not have the "evil" motives that would usually be seen in the
type of heinous

The Holocaust : The Multiple Effects Of The Holocaust
Next things next, obviously if there is a cause to an issue or situation, then inevitably there is an
effect. Since there are multiple causes, multiple effects can occur as well. For each of the causes
given, there is not one specific effect designated for those causes. Each of the causes have multiple
effects. Therefore, a list of the possible effects is necessary in order to understand what can occur
when those causes are present in reality. One possible effect is that certain groups of people may be
ostracized. If an individual does not stand up for his or herself about what he or she believes and
follows what the commander orders, then a catastrophe such as the Holocaust could occur. In the
Holocaust, millions of Jews were scrutinized by Hitler and Germany and later massacred
anonymously with people discovering this years after it had been taking place. People were hurt
because of people not recognizing the difference between right and wrong. Saul McLeod, a
Psychology Tutor at the University of Manchester, discusses of an individual who did not recognize
the wrong in a command given to him. That individual was Adolf Eichmann who was told by a
higher authority that his duty in the Holocaust was "planning of the efficient collection,
transportation and extermination of those to be killed" (McLeod). Eichmann stated, according to
McLeod, that "he had merely obeyed orders, and surely obeying orders could only be a good thing"
(McLeod). Eichmann, obviously did not recognize the magnitude of the effect when he thought
obeying orders was necessary. He probably wanted to make his leader happy so he followed the
command. I guarantee that deep down inside, Eichmann thought that what he was doing was
unethical but the satisfaction he received from pleasing his leader just outweighed his conscious.
Because Eichmann followed orders, millions were murdered and later Eichmann himself was
executed for his role in the Holocaust. Erich Fromm, who once was a psychoanalyst and
philosopher, wrote an article entitled "Disobedience as a psychological and moral problem". In this
article he makes a point relative to that of Eichmann and the Holocaust. Fromm argues that "if
mankind commits suicide it will be because people will obey

Jeff Eichmann Criminal Case

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Tiffany Carpenter

More from Tiffany Carpenter (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Jeff Eichmann Criminal Case