Saphenous vein graft
    intervention
      DR GOPI KRISHNA
   NIMS,HYDERABAD,INDIA.
•   Svg pathology.
•   Natural course.
•   Problems in interventions.
•   Techniques.
•   Procedure related complications.
•   Role of stents and supportive medications.
Patients who experience recurrence of
         ischemia after CABG
lesions in
  – saphenous vein graft (SVG).
  – native arteries.
  – internal mammary.
  – Radial.
  – gastroepiploic graft.
  – proximal subclavian artery.
Early postoperative ischemia (<1
                month):
•  acute vein graft thrombosis (60%).
•  incomplete surgical revascularization (10%).
•  kinked grafts.
•   focal stenoses distal to the insertion site and
  at the proximal or distal anastomotic sites.
• spasm or injury.
• insertion of graft to a vein causing AV fistula.
• bypass of the wrong vessel.
• all above cxs are common after minimally invasive and “off-bypass” techniques)
Early postoperative ischemia (1
          month–1 year):
• peri-anastomotic stenosis.
• graft occlusion.
• mid-SVG stenosis from fibrous intimal
  hyperplasia.
• Recurrence of angina at about three months
  postoperatively is highly suggestive of a distal
  graft anastomotic lesion and in most cases,
  lead to evaluation for PCI
Late postoperative ischemia (>3
        years after surgery):
• the most common cause of ischemia is the formation of new
  atherosclerotic plaques which contain
   –   foam cells,
   –   cholesterol crystals,
   –   blood elements,
   –   necrotic debris as in native vessels.
• However, these plaque have less fibrocollagenous tissue and
  calcifi cation, so they are softer, more friable, of larger size,
  and frequently associated with thrombus.
• The status of the LAD and its graft significantly
  influences the selection process.( because lack of
  survival benefit of repeat surgery to treat non-LAD
  ischemia.)
Interventions within hours of C.A.B.G:
• urgent coronary angiography may reveal a
  compromised graft.
• Once a graft is thrombosed-------opening of
  the native vessel is preferable.

• if the native vessel is not a reasonable
  target------------- balloon interventions
  (thrombectomy device) on the graft are also
  effective if thrombus formation is not
  extensive.
• ? Intracoronary thrombolytic therapy-1/3rd
  requiring mediastinal drainage due to
  bleeding.
Native coronary interventions
• One year after C.A.B.G,
  – patients begin to develop new atherosclerotic
    plaques in the graft conduits
                       or
  – show atherosclerotic progression in the native
    coronary arteries.
Approaches to native vessel sites in post-bypass patients

• Treatment of protected left main disease.
• recanalization of old total occlusion
                   or
• native artery via venous or arterial grafts.
Intervention of the aorto-ostial lesion
• there is a question about need of prior debulking
  followed by stenting or stenting alone of the aorto-
  ostial lesion.
• In a study by Ahmed et al. for both groups of patients
  with or without prior debulking, the TLR rate after one
  year was similar at 19%.
• The technical concern during PCI of large and bulky
  aorto-ostial lesion is the antegrade and retrograde
  embolization.
• There is distal protective device for antegrade
  embolization but there is none for retrograde
  embolization
Saphenous vein graft interventions
• 1-3yrafter surgery, patients begin to develop atherosclerotic
  plaques in the SVG.
• after 3 years, these plaques appear with increased frequency.
• At the early stage, dilation of the distal anastomosis can be
  accomplished with little morbidity and good long-term
  patency (80–90%).
• Dilation of the proximal and mid-segment of the vein graft
  was highly successful at 90%, with a low rate of mortality
  (1%), Q-wave MI, and CABG(2%).
• The rate of non-Q-wave MI was 13%.
Intervention in degenerated
        saphenous vein grafts:
• The lesions that are bulky or associated with thrombus are
  considered to be high-risk.
• The complications include distal embolization, no-refl ow,
  abrupt closure, and perforation.
• So different approaches were devised because there is much
  to lose from the standpoint of distal embolization causing
  non-Q MI and increasing long-term mortality.
• In the case of perforation of SVG, usually there is contained
  perforation rather than cardiac tamponade due to the
  extrapericardial course of the grafts and extensive post-
  pericardiotomy fi brosis
Rheolytic thrombectomy

   Dissolution and removal of                    Hypo tube
    clots from coronary and
    peripheral arteries is achieved
    by the creation of a flow-
    mediated vacuum in the                Water
    vicinity of the treated lesion.       jets
                                                    Exhaust lumen




   High speed injection of saline
    fluid into an aspiration catheter
    forms a low pressure zone at
    its orifice (the Bernoulli effect).
   The pressure gradient between the thrombus
    and the catheter tip draws clot particles into the
    lumen of the device, where they are further
    fragmented by the high speed saline jets and
    then aspirated.


   The double lumen device allows both saline
    injection and aspiration of particulate matter into
    its collection system.
   In the VeGAS 2 trial, the         40%

    Angiojet device was compared      30%                                                  33.1%
    with urokinase prior to                      Angiojet
                                                                        30.8%


    percutaneous treatment of 346     20%
                                                 Urokinase


    patients with thrombus-rich
    lesions in native coronary                                  13.9%             15.0%
                                      10%

    arteries or SVG’s.                         1.7%
                                                       3.0%

                                      0%
                                                 Death               MI              MACE




   In this high risk population,      20.0%
                                                                                    Angiojet
    procedural success and                                                          Urokinase
    hospital course without a major    15.0%

    adverse cardiac event were                          13.6%
    achieved with the Angiojet         10.0%
                                                                                          11.8%

    catheter in 86% of cases,
    significantly more frequently       5.0%
    than with urokinase (66%, P =                                                 3.3%
    0.01)                               0.0%
                                                3.3%            0.6%      3.0%

                                                      Any       Surgical Repair   Transfusion
Aspiration thrombectomy

   The X-Sizer (EndicCOR
    Medical, Inc.,) is a
    thromboatherectomy catheter
    of varying dimensions.

   Rotation of a distal helical
    cutter results in thrombus
    maceration and extraction into
    a distal vacuum collection
    bottle.

   Experience in several hundred
    pts has shown this catheter to
    be effective in debulking
    thrombus and degenerating
    SVG lesions .
   The X-TRACT trial
    demonstrated that the X-                                           X-SIZER      Control
    Sizer may be safely used as an                     25
    adjunct to PCI of diseased
    SVGs and thrombus-laden                            20
    native coronary arteries.                                                16.9             17.0 17.4
                                                                      15.8
                                                       15
    Less need for GP IIb/IIIa




                                       Incidence (%)
    inhibitor bail-out in patients                     10
    treated with the X-Sizer,
    suggesting a reduction in
    periprocedural complications.                      5
                                                            1.0 0.3                 1.8 1.5
   MACE rates at 30 days were                         0
    similar in both groups                                  Cardiac      MI          TVR      MACE
                                                             death
   There was a significantly lower
    incidence of large
    postprocedural MI at 30-day
    follow-up among patients
    treated with the X-Sizer device.
• In general, the X-Sizer system is more
  effective in removing thrombus and
  atheromatous debris .
• while the AngioJet system was effective only
  in the removal of fresh thrombus, and not the
  friable, grumous vein graft material or older
  organized thrombi
• ?Prevention of distal embolisation
  – Distal protection devices.
  – Proximaal protection devices.
SAFER Trial – Comparison of
PercuSurge to Routine Stenting in SVG’s
           801 Patients Randomized

                         20      30 Day MACE
                                 16.5%

                                           Reduced 42%
                                                  P<0.001
                                                  9.6%
                        %




                            0
                                 Routine        PercuSurge

                       Baim et al. Circulation 2002; 105: 1285.
   The 800 patient multicenter randomized SAFER
    trial demonstrated a 50% reduction in in-hospital
    adverse events with PercuSurge distal
    protection during SVG stenting, when compared
    to stenting without protection

     Preliminary experiences with the PercuSurge
    in AMI patients undergoing percutaneous
    intervention suggest that normal myocardial
    blush may be achieved in more than 60%
PercuSurge System
Advantages                  Disadvantages
   Captures smaller           Transient occlusion
    particles and              Long “parking”
    “humoral” mediators         segment
   Frequently applicable      Side branches
                                unprotected
                               Two operators
Filter wire

.
    In Filter wire-type devices, An emboli entrapment net is
    mounted on a 0.014" guidewire and expanded distally to
    the lesion.

   Intervention is then performed over the guidewire.

   Filters do not block distal blood flow when first deployed
    unlike occlusive devices.

   Dislodged material is caught by the distal filter, which is
    then closed and retracted only at the end of the
    procedure.
Fire Trial: Randomized BSC/EPI
 Filter vs. PercuSurge in SVGPCI
              650 patients in 65 sites
                    FW        GW
TIMI 3 Flow        95.7% 97.7%
Device Success     95.5% 97.2%
Death               0.9%     0.9%
MI                  9.0% 10.0%
QMI                 0.9%     0.6%
30 day MACE      9.9% 11.6%
       Conclusion: FW not inferior to GW
                           Stone et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 43A
PROXIMAL OCCULUSION
           DEVICES
 These devices    occlude flow into the
  vessel using a balloon on the tip of or just
  the tip of catheter
 Two proximal occulusion catheters are in
  use:
Proxis catheter
Kerberos embolic protection system
Proxis In Vessel
   With inflow occlusion ,
    retrograde flow generated by
    distal collaterals or infusion
    through a ”rinsing “ catheter
    can propel any liberated debris
    back into the lumen of the
    guiding catheter

   These have potential
    advantage of providing
    embolic protection even before
    the first wire crosses the
    lesion.
Benefits to Proximal Protection

 Nothing crosses the lesion prior to
  protection
 Protection of main vessel and side
  branches
 Captures large and small particles
 Can handle large embolic loads
• Is there a role for 2b3a inhibitors in SVG
  interventions ?
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions
saphenou vein graft interventions

saphenou vein graft interventions

  • 1.
    Saphenous vein graft intervention DR GOPI KRISHNA NIMS,HYDERABAD,INDIA.
  • 2.
    Svg pathology. • Natural course. • Problems in interventions. • Techniques. • Procedure related complications. • Role of stents and supportive medications.
  • 11.
    Patients who experiencerecurrence of ischemia after CABG lesions in – saphenous vein graft (SVG). – native arteries. – internal mammary. – Radial. – gastroepiploic graft. – proximal subclavian artery.
  • 12.
    Early postoperative ischemia(<1 month): • acute vein graft thrombosis (60%). • incomplete surgical revascularization (10%). • kinked grafts. • focal stenoses distal to the insertion site and at the proximal or distal anastomotic sites. • spasm or injury. • insertion of graft to a vein causing AV fistula. • bypass of the wrong vessel. • all above cxs are common after minimally invasive and “off-bypass” techniques)
  • 13.
    Early postoperative ischemia(1 month–1 year): • peri-anastomotic stenosis. • graft occlusion. • mid-SVG stenosis from fibrous intimal hyperplasia. • Recurrence of angina at about three months postoperatively is highly suggestive of a distal graft anastomotic lesion and in most cases, lead to evaluation for PCI
  • 14.
    Late postoperative ischemia(>3 years after surgery): • the most common cause of ischemia is the formation of new atherosclerotic plaques which contain – foam cells, – cholesterol crystals, – blood elements, – necrotic debris as in native vessels. • However, these plaque have less fibrocollagenous tissue and calcifi cation, so they are softer, more friable, of larger size, and frequently associated with thrombus.
  • 17.
    • The statusof the LAD and its graft significantly influences the selection process.( because lack of survival benefit of repeat surgery to treat non-LAD ischemia.)
  • 18.
    Interventions within hoursof C.A.B.G: • urgent coronary angiography may reveal a compromised graft. • Once a graft is thrombosed-------opening of the native vessel is preferable. • if the native vessel is not a reasonable target------------- balloon interventions (thrombectomy device) on the graft are also effective if thrombus formation is not extensive.
  • 19.
    • ? Intracoronarythrombolytic therapy-1/3rd requiring mediastinal drainage due to bleeding.
  • 20.
    Native coronary interventions •One year after C.A.B.G, – patients begin to develop new atherosclerotic plaques in the graft conduits or – show atherosclerotic progression in the native coronary arteries.
  • 21.
    Approaches to nativevessel sites in post-bypass patients • Treatment of protected left main disease. • recanalization of old total occlusion or • native artery via venous or arterial grafts.
  • 22.
    Intervention of theaorto-ostial lesion • there is a question about need of prior debulking followed by stenting or stenting alone of the aorto- ostial lesion. • In a study by Ahmed et al. for both groups of patients with or without prior debulking, the TLR rate after one year was similar at 19%. • The technical concern during PCI of large and bulky aorto-ostial lesion is the antegrade and retrograde embolization. • There is distal protective device for antegrade embolization but there is none for retrograde embolization
  • 23.
    Saphenous vein graftinterventions • 1-3yrafter surgery, patients begin to develop atherosclerotic plaques in the SVG. • after 3 years, these plaques appear with increased frequency. • At the early stage, dilation of the distal anastomosis can be accomplished with little morbidity and good long-term patency (80–90%). • Dilation of the proximal and mid-segment of the vein graft was highly successful at 90%, with a low rate of mortality (1%), Q-wave MI, and CABG(2%). • The rate of non-Q-wave MI was 13%.
  • 24.
    Intervention in degenerated saphenous vein grafts: • The lesions that are bulky or associated with thrombus are considered to be high-risk. • The complications include distal embolization, no-refl ow, abrupt closure, and perforation. • So different approaches were devised because there is much to lose from the standpoint of distal embolization causing non-Q MI and increasing long-term mortality. • In the case of perforation of SVG, usually there is contained perforation rather than cardiac tamponade due to the extrapericardial course of the grafts and extensive post- pericardiotomy fi brosis
  • 28.
    Rheolytic thrombectomy  Dissolution and removal of Hypo tube clots from coronary and peripheral arteries is achieved by the creation of a flow- mediated vacuum in the Water vicinity of the treated lesion. jets Exhaust lumen  High speed injection of saline fluid into an aspiration catheter forms a low pressure zone at its orifice (the Bernoulli effect).
  • 29.
    The pressure gradient between the thrombus and the catheter tip draws clot particles into the lumen of the device, where they are further fragmented by the high speed saline jets and then aspirated.  The double lumen device allows both saline injection and aspiration of particulate matter into its collection system.
  • 30.
    In the VeGAS 2 trial, the 40% Angiojet device was compared 30% 33.1% with urokinase prior to Angiojet 30.8% percutaneous treatment of 346 20% Urokinase patients with thrombus-rich lesions in native coronary 13.9% 15.0% 10% arteries or SVG’s. 1.7% 3.0% 0% Death MI MACE  In this high risk population, 20.0% Angiojet procedural success and Urokinase hospital course without a major 15.0% adverse cardiac event were 13.6% achieved with the Angiojet 10.0% 11.8% catheter in 86% of cases, significantly more frequently 5.0% than with urokinase (66%, P = 3.3% 0.01) 0.0% 3.3% 0.6% 3.0% Any Surgical Repair Transfusion
  • 31.
    Aspiration thrombectomy  The X-Sizer (EndicCOR Medical, Inc.,) is a thromboatherectomy catheter of varying dimensions.  Rotation of a distal helical cutter results in thrombus maceration and extraction into a distal vacuum collection bottle.  Experience in several hundred pts has shown this catheter to be effective in debulking thrombus and degenerating SVG lesions .
  • 32.
    The X-TRACT trial demonstrated that the X- X-SIZER Control Sizer may be safely used as an 25 adjunct to PCI of diseased SVGs and thrombus-laden 20 native coronary arteries. 16.9 17.0 17.4 15.8 15  Less need for GP IIb/IIIa Incidence (%) inhibitor bail-out in patients 10 treated with the X-Sizer, suggesting a reduction in periprocedural complications. 5 1.0 0.3 1.8 1.5  MACE rates at 30 days were 0 similar in both groups Cardiac MI TVR MACE death  There was a significantly lower incidence of large postprocedural MI at 30-day follow-up among patients treated with the X-Sizer device.
  • 33.
    • In general,the X-Sizer system is more effective in removing thrombus and atheromatous debris . • while the AngioJet system was effective only in the removal of fresh thrombus, and not the friable, grumous vein graft material or older organized thrombi
  • 34.
    • ?Prevention ofdistal embolisation – Distal protection devices. – Proximaal protection devices.
  • 37.
    SAFER Trial –Comparison of PercuSurge to Routine Stenting in SVG’s 801 Patients Randomized 20 30 Day MACE 16.5% Reduced 42% P<0.001 9.6% % 0 Routine PercuSurge Baim et al. Circulation 2002; 105: 1285.
  • 38.
    The 800 patient multicenter randomized SAFER trial demonstrated a 50% reduction in in-hospital adverse events with PercuSurge distal protection during SVG stenting, when compared to stenting without protection  Preliminary experiences with the PercuSurge in AMI patients undergoing percutaneous intervention suggest that normal myocardial blush may be achieved in more than 60%
  • 39.
    PercuSurge System Advantages Disadvantages  Captures smaller  Transient occlusion particles and  Long “parking” “humoral” mediators segment  Frequently applicable  Side branches unprotected  Two operators
  • 40.
  • 42.
    In Filter wire-type devices, An emboli entrapment net is mounted on a 0.014" guidewire and expanded distally to the lesion.  Intervention is then performed over the guidewire.  Filters do not block distal blood flow when first deployed unlike occlusive devices.  Dislodged material is caught by the distal filter, which is then closed and retracted only at the end of the procedure.
  • 43.
    Fire Trial: RandomizedBSC/EPI Filter vs. PercuSurge in SVGPCI 650 patients in 65 sites FW GW TIMI 3 Flow 95.7% 97.7% Device Success 95.5% 97.2% Death 0.9% 0.9% MI 9.0% 10.0% QMI 0.9% 0.6% 30 day MACE 9.9% 11.6% Conclusion: FW not inferior to GW Stone et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 43A
  • 49.
    PROXIMAL OCCULUSION DEVICES  These devices occlude flow into the vessel using a balloon on the tip of or just the tip of catheter  Two proximal occulusion catheters are in use: Proxis catheter Kerberos embolic protection system
  • 50.
    Proxis In Vessel  With inflow occlusion , retrograde flow generated by distal collaterals or infusion through a ”rinsing “ catheter can propel any liberated debris back into the lumen of the guiding catheter  These have potential advantage of providing embolic protection even before the first wire crosses the lesion.
  • 52.
    Benefits to ProximalProtection  Nothing crosses the lesion prior to protection  Protection of main vessel and side branches  Captures large and small particles  Can handle large embolic loads
  • 53.
    • Is therea role for 2b3a inhibitors in SVG interventions ?