JOURNAL CLUB 
Arthroplasty ffoorr FFrraaccttuurreess ooff 
tthhee PPrrooxxiimmaall ppaarrtt ooff tthhee 
HHuummeerruuss.. 
DDrr..JJeeyyaa vveennkkaatteesshh MMSS((OOrrtthh)) 
DDeepptt ooff OOrrtthhooppaaeeddiiccss,, 
JJPPNNAATTCC,, 
AAIIIIMMSS,, NNeeww DDeellhhii.. 
1
 William Osler first introduced the concept of 
‘Journal club’ in 1875 
2
3
David Dines- 
 Ex President of the American 
Shoulder and Elbow Society 
 Biomet Biomodular Total 
Shoulder System 
Josua Dines James E. Voos 
4
 Proximal humeral fractures account for 4% to 
5% of all fractures 
Complex Fractures 
? ORIF 
? Hemi 
? RSA 
5
 Concomitant injuries 
 Preinjury shoulder function 
? Previous fracture 
? Previous rotator cuff deficiency 
? Severe osteoporosis 
6
 AP 
 Transscapular Y View 
 Axillary view 
 CT :Extensive comminution, 
displaced # 
 Full length view C/L 
humerus - Template 
7
8
 NEER’S (>1cm displacement, >45˚ angulation ) 
 AO 
 HERTEL’S 
9 
H 
G 
S 
L
10
SSuurrggiiccaall tteecchhnniiqquuee:: 
11
Delto pectoral incision 
Different Fibre orientation 
Cephalic vein laterally 
Axillary fold 
12
Keep Deltoid origin & insertion intact 
13
Incise fascia over biceps tendon 
Identify the LHB 
14
Identify long head of biceps 
15
Separate & secure the tuberosities. 
16
Secure sutures in tendon bone interface 
17
Excision of fractured Humeral head 
18
Visualise the Glenoid 
19
Humeral canal is prepared by 
sequential reaming 
20
 Anterolateral & posterolateral 
drill-holes 
 1 to 1.5 cm distal to the fracture 
 Sutures are placed through these 
holes prior to cementing 
21
Height of the component 
 pre op Templating 
Intramedullary device 
Measurements on device 
22
23
24
Effect of Incorrect Version 
Too Anteverted Too Retroverted 
Tuberosity healing compromised 
25
Closed reduction 
with trial head 
component. 
The head should translate 50% 
anteriorly, posteriorly, & 
inferiorly on the glenoid 
surface. 
160˚ of forward elevation and 
stable internal & external 
rotation of the arm. 
26
SSuucccceessss ooff ssuurrggeerryy == 
TTuubbeerroossiittyy rreeccoonnssttrruuccttiioonn 
27
Bone grafting prior 
to tuberosity fixation 
28
The final humeral head component is placed after the 
sutures have been passed, and the tuberosity 
reconstruction commences. 
29
The greater tuberosity is secured to the shaft & the 
implant first, and this is followed by 
fixation of the lesser tuberosity. 
30
Vertical, Horizontal & Figure of eight sutures 
fix the tuberosities in position. 
31
 Based security of the reconstruction. 
 0 to 6 weeks : Only Passive 
 > 6 wks : Active assisted exercises 
 8 to 12 weeks : Strengthening exercises 
32
Component malposition 
Rotatorcuff failure 
Periprosthetic fracture 
Heterotopic ossification 
33
 Good pain relief, but varying outcomes with 
regards to 
function, 
motion & 
strength. 
34
Bastian and Hertel : ORIF vs Hemi 
similar ffuunnccttiioonnaall rreessuullttss && ppaattiieenntt ssaattiissffaaccttiioonn. 
ORIF with preservation of the humeral head should 
be considered when an adequate reduction and 
stable conditions for revascularization can be 
obtained. 
Hemiarthroplasty is a viable alternative for 
patients with osteopenic bone and/or a 
comminuted fracture. 
Bastian JD, Hertel R. Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty 
of fractures of the proximal humerus: 
outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Shoulder 
Elbow Surg. 2009;18:216-9 
35
Krishnan et al. : using ‘Gothic arch’ technique 
reported 88% of the tuberosities healed 
anatomically. The mmeeaann aaccttiivvee aanntteerriioorr eelleevvaattiioonn 
wwaass 112299˚,, aanndd ppaaiinn ssccoorreess aavveerraaggeedd 11..22 ppooiinnttss oonn 
aa 1100--ppooiinntt ssccaallee. 
Krishnan SG, Bennion PW, Reineck JR, Burkhead 
WZ. Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture: 
restoration of the Gothic arch. Orthop Clin North Am. 
2008;39:441-50, 
36
Boileau et al. described the ‘‘‘‘uunnhhaappppyy ttrriiaadd,,’’’’ in 
which a prosthesis has excessive height and 
retroversion and the greater tuberosity is 
positioned too low --> poor functional results, 
persistent pain & stiffness. 
Boileau P, Walch G, Krishnan SG. Tuberosity 
osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty for four-part 
fractures of the proximal humerus. Tech Shoulder 
Elbow Surg. 2000;1:96-109. 
37
Accuuttee reconstruction (less than four weeks 
after the injury) results in bbeetttteerr functional 
outcomes because of the ease of tuberosity 
reconstruction 
Dines DM, Warren RF. Modular shoulder 
hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures. Surgical 
considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;307: 
18-26. 
38
Bufquin et al. In RRSSA ssaattiissffaaccttoorryy mmoobbiilliittyy wwaass 
oobbttaaiinneedd ddeessppiittee ffrreeqquueenntt mmiiggrraattiioonn ooff tthhee 
ttuubbeerroossiittiieess, and they cautioned that an 
assessment of long-term results is required. 
Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P. Reverse shoulder 
arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of 
the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 
cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 
2007;89:516-20. 
39
DDeesscceennddiinngg oorrddeerr ooff CClliinniiccaall ssuucccceessss: 
(1) Hemi in a patient with reconstructible tuberosities, 
(2) RSA in a patient with reconstructible tuberosities, 
(3) RSA in a patient without reconstructible tuberosities, 
(4) Hemi in a patient without reconstructible tuberosities. 
40
 Newer techniques to improve functional 
outcomes. 
 Long term multicentric randomised comparative 
study between RSA & Hemiarthroplasty. 
41
42 THANK YOU

Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures.

  • 1.
    JOURNAL CLUB Arthroplastyffoorr FFrraaccttuurreess ooff tthhee PPrrooxxiimmaall ppaarrtt ooff tthhee HHuummeerruuss.. DDrr..JJeeyyaa vveennkkaatteesshh MMSS((OOrrtthh)) DDeepptt ooff OOrrtthhooppaaeeddiiccss,, JJPPNNAATTCC,, AAIIIIMMSS,, NNeeww DDeellhhii.. 1
  • 2.
     William Oslerfirst introduced the concept of ‘Journal club’ in 1875 2
  • 3.
  • 4.
    David Dines- Ex President of the American Shoulder and Elbow Society  Biomet Biomodular Total Shoulder System Josua Dines James E. Voos 4
  • 5.
     Proximal humeralfractures account for 4% to 5% of all fractures Complex Fractures ? ORIF ? Hemi ? RSA 5
  • 6.
     Concomitant injuries  Preinjury shoulder function ? Previous fracture ? Previous rotator cuff deficiency ? Severe osteoporosis 6
  • 7.
     AP Transscapular Y View  Axillary view  CT :Extensive comminution, displaced #  Full length view C/L humerus - Template 7
  • 8.
  • 9.
     NEER’S (>1cmdisplacement, >45˚ angulation )  AO  HERTEL’S 9 H G S L
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Delto pectoral incision Different Fibre orientation Cephalic vein laterally Axillary fold 12
  • 13.
    Keep Deltoid origin& insertion intact 13
  • 14.
    Incise fascia overbiceps tendon Identify the LHB 14
  • 15.
    Identify long headof biceps 15
  • 16.
    Separate & securethe tuberosities. 16
  • 17.
    Secure sutures intendon bone interface 17
  • 18.
    Excision of fracturedHumeral head 18
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Humeral canal isprepared by sequential reaming 20
  • 21.
     Anterolateral &posterolateral drill-holes  1 to 1.5 cm distal to the fracture  Sutures are placed through these holes prior to cementing 21
  • 22.
    Height of thecomponent  pre op Templating Intramedullary device Measurements on device 22
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Effect of IncorrectVersion Too Anteverted Too Retroverted Tuberosity healing compromised 25
  • 26.
    Closed reduction withtrial head component. The head should translate 50% anteriorly, posteriorly, & inferiorly on the glenoid surface. 160˚ of forward elevation and stable internal & external rotation of the arm. 26
  • 27.
    SSuucccceessss ooff ssuurrggeerryy== TTuubbeerroossiittyy rreeccoonnssttrruuccttiioonn 27
  • 28.
    Bone grafting prior to tuberosity fixation 28
  • 29.
    The final humeralhead component is placed after the sutures have been passed, and the tuberosity reconstruction commences. 29
  • 30.
    The greater tuberosityis secured to the shaft & the implant first, and this is followed by fixation of the lesser tuberosity. 30
  • 31.
    Vertical, Horizontal &Figure of eight sutures fix the tuberosities in position. 31
  • 32.
     Based securityof the reconstruction.  0 to 6 weeks : Only Passive  > 6 wks : Active assisted exercises  8 to 12 weeks : Strengthening exercises 32
  • 33.
    Component malposition Rotatorcufffailure Periprosthetic fracture Heterotopic ossification 33
  • 34.
     Good painrelief, but varying outcomes with regards to function, motion & strength. 34
  • 35.
    Bastian and Hertel: ORIF vs Hemi similar ffuunnccttiioonnaall rreessuullttss && ppaattiieenntt ssaattiissffaaccttiioonn. ORIF with preservation of the humeral head should be considered when an adequate reduction and stable conditions for revascularization can be obtained. Hemiarthroplasty is a viable alternative for patients with osteopenic bone and/or a comminuted fracture. Bastian JD, Hertel R. Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:216-9 35
  • 36.
    Krishnan et al.: using ‘Gothic arch’ technique reported 88% of the tuberosities healed anatomically. The mmeeaann aaccttiivvee aanntteerriioorr eelleevvaattiioonn wwaass 112299˚,, aanndd ppaaiinn ssccoorreess aavveerraaggeedd 11..22 ppooiinnttss oonn aa 1100--ppooiinntt ssccaallee. Krishnan SG, Bennion PW, Reineck JR, Burkhead WZ. Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture: restoration of the Gothic arch. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;39:441-50, 36
  • 37.
    Boileau et al.described the ‘‘‘‘uunnhhaappppyy ttrriiaadd,,’’’’ in which a prosthesis has excessive height and retroversion and the greater tuberosity is positioned too low --> poor functional results, persistent pain & stiffness. Boileau P, Walch G, Krishnan SG. Tuberosity osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty for four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;1:96-109. 37
  • 38.
    Accuuttee reconstruction (lessthan four weeks after the injury) results in bbeetttteerr functional outcomes because of the ease of tuberosity reconstruction Dines DM, Warren RF. Modular shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures. Surgical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;307: 18-26. 38
  • 39.
    Bufquin et al.In RRSSA ssaattiissffaaccttoorryy mmoobbiilliittyy wwaass oobbttaaiinneedd ddeessppiittee ffrreeqquueenntt mmiiggrraattiioonn ooff tthhee ttuubbeerroossiittiieess, and they cautioned that an assessment of long-term results is required. Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:516-20. 39
  • 40.
    DDeesscceennddiinngg oorrddeerr ooffCClliinniiccaall ssuucccceessss: (1) Hemi in a patient with reconstructible tuberosities, (2) RSA in a patient with reconstructible tuberosities, (3) RSA in a patient without reconstructible tuberosities, (4) Hemi in a patient without reconstructible tuberosities. 40
  • 41.
     Newer techniquesto improve functional outcomes.  Long term multicentric randomised comparative study between RSA & Hemiarthroplasty. 41
  • 42.