SlideShare a Scribd company logo
SEMANTIC
DIFFERENTIAL
SCALE
Semantic differential scale or the S.D. scale
developed by Charles E. Osgood, G.J. Suci
and P.H. Tannenbaum (1957), is an attempt to
measure the psychological meanings of an
object to an individual.
This scale is based on the presumption that an
object can have different dimensions of
connotative meanings which can be located in
multidimensional property space, or what can be
called the semantic space in the context of S.D.
scale.
This scaling consists of a set of bipolar rating
scales, usually of 7 points, by which one or
more respondents rate one or more concepts
on each scale item.
For instance, the S.D. scale items for analysing
candidates for leadership position may be shown
as under:
(E )
Successful
(P ) Severe
(P ) Heavy
(A ) Hot
(E )
Progressive
(P ) Strong
(A ) Active
(A ) Fast
(E ) True
(E ) Sociable
Unsuccessful
Lenient
Light
Cold
Regressive
Weak
Passive
Slow
False
Unsociable
3 2 1 0 –1 –2 –3
Candidates for leadership position (along with
the concept—the ‘ideal’ candidate) may be
compared and we may score them from +3 to –3
on the basis of the above stated scales.
 (The letters, E, P, A showing the relevant factor
viz., evaluation, potency and activity
respectively, written along the left side are not
written in actual scale. Similarly the numeric
values shown are also not written in actual
scale.)
Osgood and others did produce a list of some
adjective pairs for attitude research purposes and
concluded that semantic space is
multidimensional rather than unidimensional.
They made sincere efforts and ultimately found
that three factors, viz., evaluation, potency and
activity, contributed most to meaningful
judgements by respondents.
The evaluation dimension generally accounts
for 1/2 and 3/4 of the extractable variance and the
other two factors account for the balance
Procedure : - Various steps involved in
developing S.D. Scale are as follows :
First of all the concepts to be studied are
selected. The concepts are usually chosen by
personal judgement, keeping in view the nature of
the problem.
 The next step is to select the scales bearing in
mind the criterion of factor composition and the
criterion of scale’s relevance to the concepts
being judged (it is common practice to use at
least three scales for each factor with the help of
which an average factor score has to be worked
out). One more criterion to be kept in view is that
scales should be stable across subjects and
concepts.
Then a panel of judges are used to rate the
various stimuli (or objects) on the various
selected scales and the responses of all
judges would then be combined to determine
the composite scaling.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Attitude scale
Attitude scaleAttitude scale
Attitude scale
Gunjan Verma
 
Sampling in research
 Sampling in research Sampling in research
Sampling in research
Mumbai University
 
Validity of a Research Tool
Validity of a Research ToolValidity of a Research Tool
Validity of a Research Tool
jobyVarghese22
 
Quantitative research design
Quantitative research design Quantitative research design
Quantitative research design
Kiranbir Kaur
 
Likert scale
Likert scaleLikert scale
Likert scale
vanithasuresh
 
Sample and sampling techniques
Sample and sampling techniquesSample and sampling techniques
Sample and sampling techniquesNursing Path
 
Attitude Measurement Scales - Likert‘s Scale, Semantic Differential Scale, Th...
Attitude Measurement Scales - Likert‘s Scale, Semantic Differential Scale, Th...Attitude Measurement Scales - Likert‘s Scale, Semantic Differential Scale, Th...
Attitude Measurement Scales - Likert‘s Scale, Semantic Differential Scale, Th...
Sundar B N
 
Rating scale
Rating scaleRating scale
Rating scale
Eko Priyanto
 
Normal Probability Curve by Dr. Neha Deo
Normal Probability Curve by Dr. Neha DeoNormal Probability Curve by Dr. Neha Deo
Normal Probability Curve by Dr. Neha Deo
Neha Deo
 
Pilot study
Pilot studyPilot study
Pilot study
DEVA PON PUSHPAM I
 
Likert scale
Likert scaleLikert scale
Likert scale
Abhilash S Ram
 
Validity, its types, measurement & factors.
Validity, its types, measurement & factors.Validity, its types, measurement & factors.
Validity, its types, measurement & factors.Maheen Iftikhar
 
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
RESEARCH HYPOTHESISRESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
MAHESWARI JAIKUMAR
 
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGNEXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN
MAHESWARI JAIKUMAR
 
PRE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
PRE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNPRE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
PRE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
MAHESWARI JAIKUMAR
 
Nonexperimental research design
Nonexperimental research designNonexperimental research design
Nonexperimental research designNursing Path
 
Research hypothesis....ppt
Research hypothesis....pptResearch hypothesis....ppt
Research hypothesis....ppt
Rahul Dhaker
 

What's hot (20)

Attitude scale
Attitude scaleAttitude scale
Attitude scale
 
Sampling in research
 Sampling in research Sampling in research
Sampling in research
 
Validity of a Research Tool
Validity of a Research ToolValidity of a Research Tool
Validity of a Research Tool
 
Quantitative research design
Quantitative research design Quantitative research design
Quantitative research design
 
Likert scale
Likert scaleLikert scale
Likert scale
 
Sample and sampling techniques
Sample and sampling techniquesSample and sampling techniques
Sample and sampling techniques
 
Attitude Measurement Scales - Likert‘s Scale, Semantic Differential Scale, Th...
Attitude Measurement Scales - Likert‘s Scale, Semantic Differential Scale, Th...Attitude Measurement Scales - Likert‘s Scale, Semantic Differential Scale, Th...
Attitude Measurement Scales - Likert‘s Scale, Semantic Differential Scale, Th...
 
Rating scale
Rating scaleRating scale
Rating scale
 
Normal Probability Curve by Dr. Neha Deo
Normal Probability Curve by Dr. Neha DeoNormal Probability Curve by Dr. Neha Deo
Normal Probability Curve by Dr. Neha Deo
 
Pilot study
Pilot studyPilot study
Pilot study
 
Thurstone
ThurstoneThurstone
Thurstone
 
Likert scale
Likert scaleLikert scale
Likert scale
 
Measurement of scales
Measurement of scalesMeasurement of scales
Measurement of scales
 
Validity, its types, measurement & factors.
Validity, its types, measurement & factors.Validity, its types, measurement & factors.
Validity, its types, measurement & factors.
 
Pilot study
Pilot studyPilot study
Pilot study
 
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
RESEARCH HYPOTHESISRESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
 
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGNEXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH DESIGN
 
PRE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
PRE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNPRE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
PRE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
 
Nonexperimental research design
Nonexperimental research designNonexperimental research design
Nonexperimental research design
 
Research hypothesis....ppt
Research hypothesis....pptResearch hypothesis....ppt
Research hypothesis....ppt
 

Viewers also liked

Measurement and scales
Measurement and scalesMeasurement and scales
Measurement and scalesKaran Khaneja
 
Semantic differential in design
Semantic differential in designSemantic differential in design
Semantic differential in designR. Sosa
 
Measurement and scaling techniques
Measurement  and  scaling  techniquesMeasurement  and  scaling  techniques
Measurement and scaling techniquesUjjwal 'Shanu'
 
Rating scales
Rating scalesRating scales
Rating scales
AIIMS, Rishikesh
 
Attitude Measurement
Attitude MeasurementAttitude Measurement
Attitude Measurement
Matthew Hendrickson
 
Research Methodology - types of scale
Research Methodology - types of scaleResearch Methodology - types of scale
Research Methodology - types of scale
Karpagam Alagappan
 
steps in Questionnaire design
steps in Questionnaire designsteps in Questionnaire design
steps in Questionnaire designheena pathan
 
Attitude measurement and scaling techniques
Attitude measurement and scaling techniquesAttitude measurement and scaling techniques
Attitude measurement and scaling techniquesCharu Rastogi
 
Cognitive Mapping
Cognitive MappingCognitive Mapping
Cognitive Mapping
Iva Ivanova
 
Psychology of architecture
Psychology of architecturePsychology of architecture
Psychology of architecture
ismafr_
 
LO2 Elements of the Research Problem
LO2 Elements of the Research ProblemLO2 Elements of the Research Problem
LO2 Elements of the Research Problem
Jo Balucanag - Bitonio
 
Narr 3 multisensory approach to learning
Narr 3 multisensory approach to learningNarr 3 multisensory approach to learning
Narr 3 multisensory approach to learningjason19687
 
8th Grade Form Summ Scoring Rubric
8th Grade Form Summ Scoring Rubric8th Grade Form Summ Scoring Rubric
8th Grade Form Summ Scoring Rubric
CM Ites
 
Mathematical art rubric
Mathematical art rubricMathematical art rubric
Mathematical art rubricdrterriholden
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Measurement and scales
Measurement and scalesMeasurement and scales
Measurement and scales
 
Semantic differential in design
Semantic differential in designSemantic differential in design
Semantic differential in design
 
Rating scales
Rating scalesRating scales
Rating scales
 
Measurement and scaling techniques
Measurement  and  scaling  techniquesMeasurement  and  scaling  techniques
Measurement and scaling techniques
 
Attitude Scales
Attitude ScalesAttitude Scales
Attitude Scales
 
1 Attitude Scaling
1 Attitude Scaling1 Attitude Scaling
1 Attitude Scaling
 
Attitude scales
Attitude scalesAttitude scales
Attitude scales
 
Rating scales
Rating scalesRating scales
Rating scales
 
Attitude Measurement
Attitude MeasurementAttitude Measurement
Attitude Measurement
 
Research Methodology - types of scale
Research Methodology - types of scaleResearch Methodology - types of scale
Research Methodology - types of scale
 
steps in Questionnaire design
steps in Questionnaire designsteps in Questionnaire design
steps in Questionnaire design
 
Attitude measurement and scaling techniques
Attitude measurement and scaling techniquesAttitude measurement and scaling techniques
Attitude measurement and scaling techniques
 
Stapel scale
Stapel scaleStapel scale
Stapel scale
 
Cognitive Mapping
Cognitive MappingCognitive Mapping
Cognitive Mapping
 
Psychology of architecture
Psychology of architecturePsychology of architecture
Psychology of architecture
 
LO2 Elements of the Research Problem
LO2 Elements of the Research ProblemLO2 Elements of the Research Problem
LO2 Elements of the Research Problem
 
Narr 3 multisensory approach to learning
Narr 3 multisensory approach to learningNarr 3 multisensory approach to learning
Narr 3 multisensory approach to learning
 
8th Grade Form Summ Scoring Rubric
8th Grade Form Summ Scoring Rubric8th Grade Form Summ Scoring Rubric
8th Grade Form Summ Scoring Rubric
 
Mathematical art rubric
Mathematical art rubricMathematical art rubric
Mathematical art rubric
 
A2 check-list
A2 check-listA2 check-list
A2 check-list
 

Similar to Semantic differential

Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastriAttitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
sakshishastri3
 
Scales: Semantic Differential Scale Summated Rating Scale
Scales: Semantic Differential Scale Summated Rating ScaleScales: Semantic Differential Scale Summated Rating Scale
Scales: Semantic Differential Scale Summated Rating Scale
DrSindhuAlmas
 
Attitude scale
Attitude scaleAttitude scale
Attitude scale
Rama krishnan
 
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01Surabhi Prajapati
 
Some Research ques & ans ( Assignment)
Some Research ques & ans ( Assignment)Some Research ques & ans ( Assignment)
Some Research ques & ans ( Assignment)
Moin Sarker
 
BRM Unit II
BRM Unit IIBRM Unit II
BRM Unit II
Murugan Saravanan
 
Attitude Measurement Scales
 Attitude Measurement Scales Attitude Measurement Scales
Attitude Measurement Scales
Quratulaintahir1
 
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptxEstablishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
RayLorenzOrtega
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
Tahira Altaf Esabzai
 
The conceptualization of educational evaluation (david nevo, 1983)
The conceptualization of educational evaluation (david nevo, 1983)The conceptualization of educational evaluation (david nevo, 1983)
The conceptualization of educational evaluation (david nevo, 1983)A. Amadeus Castro Vega
 
unit 2.4.ppt
unit 2.4.pptunit 2.4.ppt
unit 2.4.ppt
Sumit Kumar
 
A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS FOR VERBAL, INFORMAL, AND FORMAL-DEDUCTIVE ...
A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS FOR VERBAL, INFORMAL, AND FORMAL-DEDUCTIVE ...A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS FOR VERBAL, INFORMAL, AND FORMAL-DEDUCTIVE ...
A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS FOR VERBAL, INFORMAL, AND FORMAL-DEDUCTIVE ...
Tiffany Daniels
 
Development of assessment tools
Development of assessment toolsDevelopment of assessment tools
Development of assessment tools
Mart Enriquez
 
Development of assessment tools
Development of assessment toolsDevelopment of assessment tools
Development of assessment tools
Dhen Bords
 
What is research & process
What is research & processWhat is research & process
What is research & process
Abaid Manj
 
arStarting1.ppt
arStarting1.pptarStarting1.ppt
arStarting1.ppt
AisahHadjiracman2
 
Lecture 07
Lecture 07Lecture 07
Lecture 07
MEHTAB REHMAN
 

Similar to Semantic differential (20)

Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastriAttitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
 
Scales: Semantic Differential Scale Summated Rating Scale
Scales: Semantic Differential Scale Summated Rating ScaleScales: Semantic Differential Scale Summated Rating Scale
Scales: Semantic Differential Scale Summated Rating Scale
 
Attitude scale
Attitude scaleAttitude scale
Attitude scale
 
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
Scaling 120121081027-phpapp01
 
Some Research ques & ans ( Assignment)
Some Research ques & ans ( Assignment)Some Research ques & ans ( Assignment)
Some Research ques & ans ( Assignment)
 
BRM Unit II
BRM Unit IIBRM Unit II
BRM Unit II
 
Attitude Measurement Scales
 Attitude Measurement Scales Attitude Measurement Scales
Attitude Measurement Scales
 
Attitude scaling
Attitude scalingAttitude scaling
Attitude scaling
 
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptxEstablishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
Establishing Validity-and-Reliability-Test ppt.pptx
 
Presentation1
Presentation1Presentation1
Presentation1
 
The conceptualization of educational evaluation (david nevo, 1983)
The conceptualization of educational evaluation (david nevo, 1983)The conceptualization of educational evaluation (david nevo, 1983)
The conceptualization of educational evaluation (david nevo, 1983)
 
unit 2.4.ppt
unit 2.4.pptunit 2.4.ppt
unit 2.4.ppt
 
CMSS FIVE
CMSS FIVECMSS FIVE
CMSS FIVE
 
A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS FOR VERBAL, INFORMAL, AND FORMAL-DEDUCTIVE ...
A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS FOR VERBAL, INFORMAL, AND FORMAL-DEDUCTIVE ...A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS FOR VERBAL, INFORMAL, AND FORMAL-DEDUCTIVE ...
A COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF SOLUTIONS FOR VERBAL, INFORMAL, AND FORMAL-DEDUCTIVE ...
 
Development of assessment tools
Development of assessment toolsDevelopment of assessment tools
Development of assessment tools
 
Measurement and evaluation
Measurement and evaluationMeasurement and evaluation
Measurement and evaluation
 
Development of assessment tools
Development of assessment toolsDevelopment of assessment tools
Development of assessment tools
 
What is research & process
What is research & processWhat is research & process
What is research & process
 
arStarting1.ppt
arStarting1.pptarStarting1.ppt
arStarting1.ppt
 
Lecture 07
Lecture 07Lecture 07
Lecture 07
 

Semantic differential

  • 2. Semantic differential scale or the S.D. scale developed by Charles E. Osgood, G.J. Suci and P.H. Tannenbaum (1957), is an attempt to measure the psychological meanings of an object to an individual. This scale is based on the presumption that an object can have different dimensions of connotative meanings which can be located in multidimensional property space, or what can be called the semantic space in the context of S.D. scale.
  • 3. This scaling consists of a set of bipolar rating scales, usually of 7 points, by which one or more respondents rate one or more concepts on each scale item.
  • 4. For instance, the S.D. scale items for analysing candidates for leadership position may be shown as under: (E ) Successful (P ) Severe (P ) Heavy (A ) Hot (E ) Progressive (P ) Strong (A ) Active (A ) Fast (E ) True (E ) Sociable Unsuccessful Lenient Light Cold Regressive Weak Passive Slow False Unsociable 3 2 1 0 –1 –2 –3
  • 5. Candidates for leadership position (along with the concept—the ‘ideal’ candidate) may be compared and we may score them from +3 to –3 on the basis of the above stated scales.  (The letters, E, P, A showing the relevant factor viz., evaluation, potency and activity respectively, written along the left side are not written in actual scale. Similarly the numeric values shown are also not written in actual scale.)
  • 6. Osgood and others did produce a list of some adjective pairs for attitude research purposes and concluded that semantic space is multidimensional rather than unidimensional. They made sincere efforts and ultimately found that three factors, viz., evaluation, potency and activity, contributed most to meaningful judgements by respondents. The evaluation dimension generally accounts for 1/2 and 3/4 of the extractable variance and the other two factors account for the balance
  • 7. Procedure : - Various steps involved in developing S.D. Scale are as follows : First of all the concepts to be studied are selected. The concepts are usually chosen by personal judgement, keeping in view the nature of the problem.  The next step is to select the scales bearing in mind the criterion of factor composition and the criterion of scale’s relevance to the concepts being judged (it is common practice to use at least three scales for each factor with the help of which an average factor score has to be worked out). One more criterion to be kept in view is that scales should be stable across subjects and concepts.
  • 8. Then a panel of judges are used to rate the various stimuli (or objects) on the various selected scales and the responses of all judges would then be combined to determine the composite scaling.