Downloaded 15 times
More Related Content
Similar to Quality vs quantity in higher education
Quality vs quantity in higher education
- 1. Quality Vs Quantityin Higher Education : Does the system know its need ? Priyaranjan Lecturer P.G. Department of Education North Orissa University
- 2. Education and Nationaldevelopment Those persons who are making in-depth study on governance have understood that the future destiny of any country is dependent on the education of youths.-Aristotle
- 3. Importance of higherEducation Higher education and society Higher education and productivity Higher education and economy Higher education and democracy
- 4.
- 5. Literacy development inIndia .
- 6. UN Report andOur Position Who Are Ahead of us ? Bhutan Zambia Vietnam Ghana 105th Position Is Given To Us On The Basis Of Data Given By Our Government
- 7. Youth literacy Country YearAdult Literacy Rate Youth Literacy Rate China 2010 95.1% 99.6% Sri Lanka 2007 90.8% 98.0% Burma 2007 89.9% 94.4% World Average 2010 84% 89.6% India 2011 74.04% 81.1% Nepal 2007 55.5% 62.7% Pakistan 2007 50.2% 70.8%
- 8. Decrease In illiteracybut increase in numbers .year Illiterate No. 1951 2948.3 1961 3149.3 1971 3396.5 1981 3856.0 1991 4045.0 2001 3616.6 2010 3026.4
- 9. Illiterates of IndiaVs population of some country . 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 USA BRAZIL RUSSIA JAPAN BRITAN FRANCE GERMAN IND ILLITERATES 31.89 20.33 14.6 12.71 6.14 6.21 8.22 30.2
- 10. SOME MORE STATISTICS.. Totalpopulation of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, South Korea and Japan is Less Than Our Illiterates’ Number…… Population of Europe is less than it. Our dropout is more than the population of Australia Class 5th dropout ……. Population of South Korea 8th dropout is more than the population of Japan
- 11.
- 12. Number of Institutesbut alone India 1396331 Schools 44 Central Universities 306 State Universities 154State Private Universities 129 Deemed Universities 67 Institution of National Importance Total 700 Degree-granting Institutions 35,539 Affiliated Colleges
- 13. Higher Study ofsocial Science in Odisha Sl. No Name of university Year of Establishment No of Regular Social Science Departments* Percentage (as Compared to ICSSR subjects) 1 Utkal University 1943 14 82.35% 2 Sambalpur University 1967 8 47.09% 3 Berahampur University 1967 9 52.94% 4 North Odisha University 1998 1 05% 5 Fakir Mohan University 1999 4 23.52% 6 Ravenshaw University 2006 10 58.82% 7 Central University of Odisha 2009 5 29.41%
- 14. Scope of StudyAt P.G. level Sl. No Name of university Subject wise PG seats Education Political Science Anthropology History Psychology Economics 1 Utkal University - 64 32 64 48 88 2 Ravenshaw University 40 48 - 16 16 104 3 Sambalpur University - 64 16 48 - 40 4 Berahampur University - 56 - 56 - 40 5 North Odisha University - - - - - 30 6 Fakir Mohan University - 16 - - - 16 7 Central University of Odisha - - 30 - - 30 Total no of PG seats (including colleges) 136 672 94 584 96 534
- 15. Obstacles of Highereducation system Problems related to Infrastructure Miss match in supply and demand Lack of exposure Lack numbers of faculties Lack of progressive outlook of the state lack of relevant opportunity Student politics Banking concept of higher education
- 16. Who needs thequality Student Teacher Parent Institution State
- 17. Some Fundamental Questions •Whatwe actually need ? •Quality or Quantity or Both ? •How, whom and who to assure?
- 18. Suggestion Quality inside theinstitute Quantity of the institute Transparency in system Curriculum development Education and Productivity
- 19.