Qmm sept 22 2015

1. Please take a moment to check your audio settings Welcome to the quarterly membership meeting Tuesday 22 September 2015 Unless otherwise indicated, this presentation is licensed CC-BY 4.0

2. Agenda 1. OCW Scholar - Joseph Pickett & Sarah Hansen, MIT 2. Call for Proposals, Open Education Global Conference 3. Open Education Week 2016 4. Open Education Awards for Excellence Nomination 5. Results, Membership Survey 6. Open Education Information Center 7. OECx MOOC Project 8. Questions, comments, discussion items from members The meeting will last approx 1 hour. We encourage you to ask questions and participate in discussions using the microphone and/or chat window Full agenda available here: http://www.oeconsortium.org/about- oec/membership/quarterly-membership-meetings/

4. MIT OCW SCHOLAR Joseph Pickett & Sarah Hansen September 2015

5. About OCW Scholar Page 5 MIT Office of Digital Learning | odl.mit.edu

6. ocw.mit.edu/courses/ocw-scholar/ Page 6 MIT Office of Digital Learning | odl.mit.edu

7. Relationship between MOOCS and OCW SCHOLAR COURSES Page 7 MIT Office of Digital Learning | odl.mit.edu • Independent • No registration/certificat e • Materials permanently available • Easy downloading • Creative Commons • Sequential • Video • Simulations • Assessment opportunities • Interactive • Discussion forums • Certificate • Start and end date • All Rights Reserved MOOCS OCW SCHOLAR

8. Building an OCW Scholar Course Page 8 MIT Office of Digital Learning | odl.mit.edu  Time frame: 9 to 12+ months  People: Instructional Team, Department Liaison and Publication Manager, Production Team, Video Team, Site Authoring Team  Creative Commons: Intellectual Property  Accessibility

9. Enhancing Scholar Courses with OCW Educator Page 9 MIT Office of Digital Learning | odl.mit.edu

10. We welcome your questions. Page 10 MIT Office of Digital Learning | odl.mit.edu

12. http://conference.oeconsortium.org

16. To participate in the planning group, send an email to info@openeducationweek.org

18. Open Education Awards • Individual Awards, Site & Course Awards, Project Awards • Announced at Open Education Global 2016 • Nominate at http://www.oeconsortium.org/projects/open- education-awards-for-excellence/

20. Membership Survey • Purpose : To better understand member needs and plan Consortium activities around the specified needs • Sent out to member institutions & organizations • 40 respondents

21. On Using OER • Do faculty at your institution currently use (or are encouraged to use) OER within their daily teaching and learning practices? Yes No Yes 22 (55%) No 18 (45%)

22. • Do faculty at your institution currently develop new OER (or are encouraged to develop) collaboratively with other academics or institutions? Yes No Yes 23 (58%) No 17 (43%)

23. If yes, please describe. • Add OER as a part of course reading materials or assignments. • All of our content is OER • Faculty use MOOCs and OCW in their teaching • Some faculty use their OCW courses as an alternative to publishing their materials on the university LMS. • OERs are built into courses by faculty subject-matter experts as learning resources. • It's part of course requirement to confirm that they’ve considered OER. • They translate some part of articles in foreign languages in language classes).

24. On Institutional Policies • Does your institution have policies related to open education? Yes No Yes 25 (63%) No 15 (38%)

25. • If yes, which areas does the policy cover? 0 5 10 15 20 faculty support for OER creation adoption of OER, such as open textbooks open licensing in institutional repositories open access open data * Response shows multiple answers from each respondent

26. On MOOCs • Do you consider MOOCs as open education initiatives? Yes No Yes 34 (85%)No 6 (15%)

27. Yes No • Does your institution offer one or more MOOCs? Yes 21 (53%) No 19 (47%)

28. • If yes, what platform are you using? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 FutureLearn edX Coursera Canvas Moodle OECx Open Assembly Miriada X Own platform

29. Yes No • If no, does your institution plan to start a MOOC in the coming 12 months? Yes 8 (42%) No 11 (58%)

30. Any Comments on MOOCs? • Difficulty in joining well-known platforms • Not ready to tackle sustainability challenge with MOOCs • MOOCs will be one of the lasting innovations in OE and online pedagogy in the future. It helps university to benchmark its quality of services with the prominent university globally. • MOOCs will serve as important tool for virtual student mobility. • Encouraging all MOOCs use Open licenses will broaden use of OERs across cultures • Not sure if the MOOC is a long-term solution at this time. Concerned about the hype on MOOCs. • MOOCs have come to stay, but there is no sustainable business or operational model yet.

31. In 2014, the Open Education Consortium ran an “Open MOOC” pilot project that allowed OEC members to offer openly licensed MOOCs on the edX platform under the OECx shingle. An OECx course must be based on existing OERs. If OECx continues to offer the opportunity, would your institution be interested running an open MOOC as a part of OECx? 19 said Yes 16 said No

32. If you were to offer an open MOOC with OECx, what kind of assistance would you need? 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Using the edX platform Best practices Course Evaluation Overall MOOC Developing MOOC strategy Preparing materials Promotion Data analytics

33. On Open Education Week 2015 • Did you participate in the 2015 Open Education Week? Yes No Yes 26 (65%)No 14 (35%)

34. If yes, please list the activities you offered •A series of seminars - one each day. •Webinar tour of site/open education project •24-hr Twitter event •A colloquium & several short presentations •Participation at a conference related to open education •Launching a MOOC •Host a competition on OCW user experiences and artworks for 2015.

35. Did you use materials from the website to promote open education week or your event (web banners, posters, slide template, etc) 15 said yes

36. What suggestions do you have to make Open Education Week more effective? - Get more people to participate - Host a contest (maybe regional) - Enable submission & list events on the website early on - Organizing events by region would be more effective - Make all presentations downloadable (at once) - More use of social media and blogging - Showcase newcomers (inspirational cases)

37. Yes No On Quarterly Membership Meeting • Have you participated in an OEC online/quarterly membership meeting? Yes 22 (55%) No 18 (45%)

38. If yes, what did you like and/or dislike about the meeting? Likes: - It’s good to know current projects of the Consortium - Updates on what members are doing

39. On OE Consortium Newsletter • Do you receive the OEC newsletter? Yes 26 No 10 Yes 28 (70%) No 12 (30%)

40. On Professional Directory Are you listed in the Open Education Professional Directory? Yes No No 15 (42%) Yes 21 (58%)

41. On Information Center What kind of information would you like to see in the Open Education Information Center? 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 FAQ Case studies Central location for tools and apps Info on starting an open education Presentation templates Community news Forum Links to slides and presentations

42. On Consortium Activities Please indicate if you are interested in participating in any of the following initiatives and activities (check all that apply) 0 5 10 15 20 Open Education for lifelong learning Improving discoverability of resources Marketing and messaging on the value of openness and… Open Education Global conference program… Outreach to businesses and corporations Open Education Week planning group

50. OECx MOOC Project •Transform Open Courseware into Massive Open Online Courses (openly licensed) to increase access and reduce costs. •Verified certificates available thru edX platform. •Research Questions –How can re-using OCW make MOOC development more cost effective? –How can re-using OCW increase collaboration opportunities?

51. Pilot Year Courses •9 MOOCs from universities in Taiwan, U.S., Spain, UK/India, Japan and one U.S. college •Average Enrollment: 3250 students –21st Century Energy –Water and Health –Helicopters –Business –Teacher Education in India –Corporate Social Responsibility –Effects of Radiation

52. OECx Support Tiers •New OECx developer –Up to 60 hours of support (6-9 months) –Instructional Design Review –Some Platform Support •New MOOC by current OECx developer –Up to 30 hours of support (3-6 months) –Instructional Design Review –Limited Platform Support •Rerun an existing OECx MOOC –10-15 hours of technical support (3-4 months) –10% or less modifications to original MOOC Contact unatdaly@oeconsortium.org for details

54. Thank you! For updates on Consortium activities: Follow us @oeconsortium, @openeducationwk Join the FB group oeconsortium, openeducationwk LinkedIn group Open Education Consortium

Qmm sept 22 2015

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Qmm sept 22 2015

Similar to Qmm sept 22 2015 (20)

More from Open Education Global (OEGlobal)

More from Open Education Global (OEGlobal) (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Qmm sept 22 2015