This presentation was given at the OpenCourseWare Consortium Global Meeting in May, 2011. It describes some of the results from an evaluation project initiated by Open.Michigan in September 2010. Full results can be found at tinyurl.com/omevaluation.
A Workshop: Promoting Student Access and Success Through ResearchTanya Joosten
Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research
July 7, 2015 - 8:30am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Blended Models & Course Design
Interactive Workshop - 210 minutes
Location: Governor's Square 14
Virtual Session
Session Duration: 210 Minutes
Workshop Session 1 & 2 (combined)
Abstract:
Participate in the development of a research model to support the National DETA Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Education.
Extended Abstract
Come help us develop a research model to facilitate cross institutional research on blended instruction. The future of blended learning should be driven by research-based instructional and institutional interventions as the result of cross institutional research impacting access, learning effectiveness, and student satisfaction.
To give you a little background, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee will share their efforts in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. They seek to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies. Specifically, DETA looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in blended and online learning, including competency-based education, for underrepresented populations through rigorous research.
This workshop looks to engage the blended learning community in assisting of the development of DETA's research agenda, including a research model for distance education and research toolkits that can be used by institutions across the country. Through collaborative group discussions, this workshop will look for participants to brainstorm and prioritize ideas around defining student success, identifying key research questions to drive future research, development of shared measures to be gathered by different institutions, creation of instrumentation, and more. The outcomes of this workshop will inform research conducted in 2016. Further, opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research, will be discussed.
For more information on our efforts thus, see http://uwm.edu/deta/summit.
Come be a part of this exciting initiative!
Promoting Student Access and Success Through ResearchTanya Joosten
October 16, 2015 - 10:45am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Diane Reddy (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Student Services and Learner Support
Featured Session
Location: Southern Hemisphere II
Session: Concurrent Session 10
Session Duration: 45 Minutes
Virtual Session
Abstract:
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee discusses promoting access and success of distance education students through research efforts. They will share their agenda in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education.
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education: A Research ToolkitTanya Joosten
An ELI Short Course delivered on May 16th, 2016.
This session consists of practice-based research planning activities to help participants prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research toolkit developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online learning. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative. The DETA Center seeks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented learners.
Objectives:
After participating in this webinar, participants will be able to:
Develop research questions
Clarify variables and measures
Identify data gathering techniques
Consider other actionable milestones necessary to conduct rigorous research
http://www.educause.edu/events/eli-webinar-conducting-research-blended-and-online-education
Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA)Tanya Joosten
The National Distance Education And Technological Advancement (DETA) Research Center Information Session
April 24, 2015 - 9:25am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Effective Teaching and Learning Pedagogy
Information Session
Location: Stateroom 1
Session: Concurrent Session 8
Session Duration: 50 Minutes
Abstract:
The presentation will share National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education research agenda, proposed research model for distance education, and opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research.
Promoting student access and success through researchTanya Joosten
Conference Keynote
"Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research"
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee will share its agenda in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA). It seeks to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies.
https://www.qualitymatters.org/events/mid-atlantic-conference
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education, WorkshopTanya Joosten
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education
October 14, 2015 - 8:30am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Nori Barajas-Murphy (University of La Verne, USA)
Track: Learning Effectiveness
Pre-Conference Workshop
Location: Oceanic 7
Session Duration: 3 Hours
Pre-Conference Workshop Session 3
This workshop consists of practice-based research planning activities to help you prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research model developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative.
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) established a National Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) Research Center in 2014 to conduct cross-institutional data collection with 2-year and 4-year Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) funded by the U.S. Department of Education Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE). UWM has partnered with the University of Wisconsin System, UW-Extension, Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC), EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI), and leaders across the nation to develop a research model. This model is to promote student access and success through evidence-based online learning practices and learning technologies.
The DETA Center looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented individuals (i.e., economically disadvantaged, adult learners, disabled) through rigorous research. Furthermore, although the research currently is focused on postsecondary U.S. institutions, the DETA Center looks to advance their work in K-12 and internationally -- all are welcome!
This workshop will prepare attendees to take a plan back to their own institution to successfully gather research on blended and online teaching and learning.
For more on DETA, visit http://www.uwm.edu/deta.
A Workshop: Promoting Student Access and Success Through ResearchTanya Joosten
Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research
July 7, 2015 - 8:30am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Blended Models & Course Design
Interactive Workshop - 210 minutes
Location: Governor's Square 14
Virtual Session
Session Duration: 210 Minutes
Workshop Session 1 & 2 (combined)
Abstract:
Participate in the development of a research model to support the National DETA Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Education.
Extended Abstract
Come help us develop a research model to facilitate cross institutional research on blended instruction. The future of blended learning should be driven by research-based instructional and institutional interventions as the result of cross institutional research impacting access, learning effectiveness, and student satisfaction.
To give you a little background, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee will share their efforts in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. They seek to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies. Specifically, DETA looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in blended and online learning, including competency-based education, for underrepresented populations through rigorous research.
This workshop looks to engage the blended learning community in assisting of the development of DETA's research agenda, including a research model for distance education and research toolkits that can be used by institutions across the country. Through collaborative group discussions, this workshop will look for participants to brainstorm and prioritize ideas around defining student success, identifying key research questions to drive future research, development of shared measures to be gathered by different institutions, creation of instrumentation, and more. The outcomes of this workshop will inform research conducted in 2016. Further, opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research, will be discussed.
For more information on our efforts thus, see http://uwm.edu/deta/summit.
Come be a part of this exciting initiative!
Promoting Student Access and Success Through ResearchTanya Joosten
October 16, 2015 - 10:45am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Diane Reddy (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Student Services and Learner Support
Featured Session
Location: Southern Hemisphere II
Session: Concurrent Session 10
Session Duration: 45 Minutes
Virtual Session
Abstract:
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee discusses promoting access and success of distance education students through research efforts. They will share their agenda in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education.
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education: A Research ToolkitTanya Joosten
An ELI Short Course delivered on May 16th, 2016.
This session consists of practice-based research planning activities to help participants prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research toolkit developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online learning. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative. The DETA Center seeks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented learners.
Objectives:
After participating in this webinar, participants will be able to:
Develop research questions
Clarify variables and measures
Identify data gathering techniques
Consider other actionable milestones necessary to conduct rigorous research
http://www.educause.edu/events/eli-webinar-conducting-research-blended-and-online-education
Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA)Tanya Joosten
The National Distance Education And Technological Advancement (DETA) Research Center Information Session
April 24, 2015 - 9:25am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA)
Track: Effective Teaching and Learning Pedagogy
Information Session
Location: Stateroom 1
Session: Concurrent Session 8
Session Duration: 50 Minutes
Abstract:
The presentation will share National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) funded by the U.S. Department of Education research agenda, proposed research model for distance education, and opportunities for community engagement, including funding to conduct cross-institutional research.
Promoting student access and success through researchTanya Joosten
Conference Keynote
"Promoting Student Access and Success Through Research"
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee will share its agenda in the establishment of the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA). It seeks to foster student access and success through evidence-based, cross-institutional online learning practices and technologies.
https://www.qualitymatters.org/events/mid-atlantic-conference
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education, WorkshopTanya Joosten
Conducting Research on Blended and Online Education
October 14, 2015 - 8:30am
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, USA)
Nori Barajas-Murphy (University of La Verne, USA)
Track: Learning Effectiveness
Pre-Conference Workshop
Location: Oceanic 7
Session Duration: 3 Hours
Pre-Conference Workshop Session 3
This workshop consists of practice-based research planning activities to help you prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research model developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative.
The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) established a National Distance Education and Technological Advancement (DETA) Research Center in 2014 to conduct cross-institutional data collection with 2-year and 4-year Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) funded by the U.S. Department of Education Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE). UWM has partnered with the University of Wisconsin System, UW-Extension, Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC), EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI), and leaders across the nation to develop a research model. This model is to promote student access and success through evidence-based online learning practices and learning technologies.
The DETA Center looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented individuals (i.e., economically disadvantaged, adult learners, disabled) through rigorous research. Furthermore, although the research currently is focused on postsecondary U.S. institutions, the DETA Center looks to advance their work in K-12 and internationally -- all are welcome!
This workshop will prepare attendees to take a plan back to their own institution to successfully gather research on blended and online teaching and learning.
For more on DETA, visit http://www.uwm.edu/deta.
Conducting Research in Blended and Online EducationTanya Joosten
A workshop at #WCET15 in Denver, CO
This hands-on workshop consists of practice-based research planning activities to help you prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research model developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative. The DETA Center looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented individuals (i.e., economically disadvantaged, adult learners, disabled) through rigorous research. This workshop will prepare attendees to take a plan back to their own institution to successfully gather research on blended and online teaching and learning. For more on DETA, visit http://www.uwm.edu/deta. The workshop will span two concurrent session blocks- part I, 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. and part II, 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. Bring your laptop or mobile device.
http://wcetconference.wiche.edu/sessions/conducting-research-blended-and-online
Effectiveness of Blended and Online ProgramsTanya Joosten
My portion of the preso from:
Join Malcolm Brown, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative director, and Veronica Diaz, ELI associate director, as they moderate this special two-hour webinar hosted by the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative and Quality Matters. This webinar will provide you with examples and tools to craft plans that measure the effectiveness of your online/blended instructional programs and their impact on student learning and success. You will explore rubrics, hear about institutional efforts, and engage in activities that relate to quality assurance work. The purpose of the event is to understand some approaches to measure the effectiveness of online/blended learning programs:
Learn about national research efforts on quality assurance in online/blended environments
Gather ideas on demonstrating the efficacy of your online/blended learning implementations
Consider approaches for measuring the impact of online/blended programs within a specific institutional context
http://www.educause.edu/events/eli-webinar-measuring-effectiveness-onlineblended-programs
The session explored two of the recurring themes in the MOOC research literature (a) the potential of MOOCs for universities and teaching practice and (b) the quality of MOOCs and their relationship to higher education curricula and learning design. In our research we were particularly interested in the impact of MOOCs on teaching practice, and the reuse of MOOC content by teaching practitioners. We reported on our investigation of interviewing MOOC programme leaders and tutors on the broad issue of transfer of innovation from MOOCs into teaching practice. Our claim is that MOOCs can play a potentially significant role in innovating practice and curriculum design. Our findings reveal that this impact can be direct when MOOCs are embedded in the distance learning curriculum. Interestingly, when the impact is indirect and unintended, learning design features of MOOCs challenge and enrich ‘traditional’ and more established teaching practices in distance learning environments. In blended learning, the influence is on campus practices, e.g. introducing MOOC attributes into campus classes and reviewing assessment.
Teaching in MOOCs: Unbundling the roles of the educatorRebecca Ferguson
Teaching in MOOCs: Unbundling the roles of the educator, a presentation given at the design4learning conference at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK by Rebecca Ferguson (co-authored with Denise Whitelock) on 26 November 2014.
Promoting Effective Teaching and Learning Ecosystems via Research Proven Prac...Tanya Joosten
ELI Leadership Seminar, 2016, San Antonio TX
The ELI Leadership Seminar, "Promoting a Sustainable and Effective Teaching and Learning Ecosystem via Research Proven Practice," is an extended learning opportunity threaded throughout the annual meeting program. The goals for this seminar are to:
Enable quality teaching and learning through evidence-based faculty development to diffuse proven instructional interventions and practices
Discover ways to gather evidence using a research model for online learning, including key research questions driving inquiry
Explore different research designs (experimental and survey with data mining) for studying teaching and learning innovations
Develop a research plan for your program or institution that will assist in identifying effective instructional and institutional practices in blended and online learning
Identify potential methods of effectively engaging faculty in teaching and researching innovations in student learning
Learn about institutional mechanisms that can impact quality in teaching and learning, particularly in blended and online environments
Enable participants to network with peers interested in promoting effective teaching and learning through research on blended and online programming at universities
Participants, both new and experienced, will benefit from peer interaction and the opportunity to network and engage with leaders during small group discussions. Participants will meet with, share with, and learn from a cohort of peers from a wide range of positions supporting teaching and learning from different types of higher education institutions.
OLC Innovate: Why Isn’t There More Cross-Institutional Research?Tanya Joosten
Why Isn’t There More Cross-Institutional Research?
Date: Thursday, April 19th
Time: 8:45 AM to 9:30 AM
Conference Session: Concurrent Session 4
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee)
Co-presenters: Rachel Cusatis (National Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements), Lindsey Harness (Distance Education and Technological Advancements)
Track: Research: Designs, Methods, and Findings
Location: Belmont A
Session Duration: 45min
Brief Abstract:
After conducting seven cross-institutional research studies in online learning and competency-based education, we will share what we have learned in the process and discuss ways to advance cross-institutional research.
Critical issues in contemporary open education researchRobert Farrow
This presentation outlines some key considerations for researchers working in the fields of open education, OER and MOOC. Key lines of debate in the open education movement will be described and critically assessed. A reflective overview of the award-winning OER Research Hub project will be used to frame several key considerations around the methodology and purpose of OER research (including 'impact' and 'open practices'). These will be compared with results from a 2016 OER Hub consultation with key stakeholders in the open education movement on research priorities for the sector. The presentation will conclude with thoughts on the potential for openness to act as a disruptive force in higher education.
Application of Significance Tests to Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)FutureLearn FLAN
Presented by Simon Coton and Steve Cayzer of the University of Bath at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK on 15 June 2017. This presentation formed part of the FutureLearn Academic Network section (FLAN Day) of the 38th Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) conference. For full details, see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/3004
CDE-funded Teaching and Research Award project "Identifying Effective Formative Assessment Practices and Feedback Processes: Lecturer and Student Experiences", as displayed at RIDE 2010 conference.
Lead researcher Dr. Stylianos Hatzipanagos(stylianos.hatzipanagos@kcl.ac.uk, King's College London).
What are the expectations of disabled learners when participating in MOOCs?FutureLearn FLAN
Presented by Francisco Iniesto, Patrick McAndrew, Shailey Minocha and Tim Coughlan of The Open University at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK on 15 June 2017. This presentation formed part of the FutureLearn Academic Network section (FLAN Day) of the 38th Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) conference. For full details, see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/3004
Land of The Learning Giants: The Rise of MOOCsEamon Costello
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been heralded and decried in something of equal measure over the last four years. Their ultimate purpose and the effect they are having are still uncertain but given the level of maturity that has now reached we ought now to be able to attempt to answer some questions of this phenomenon. Following an overview of key issues for educational research on the topic of MOOCs this paper presents findings from studies we have conducted into
* Representations of MOOCs in the Irish Print Media: What are the narratives, who is telling it and why?
* Quality of education in MOOCs in particular regarding online testing
* The strategic drivers for higher education institutions in Ireland to develop MOOCs
Presentation given at SCONUL 2014, the summer conference of The Society of College, National and University Libraries, Glasgow, June 2014. The presentation focuses on frequently asked questions (FAQs) about learning analytics, with the emphasis on the role and perspective of libraries in this area.
What does educators' engagement with MOOC discussions look like?FutureLearn FLAN
Presented by Fereshte Goshtasbpour of the University of Leeds at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK on 15 June 2017. This presentation formed part of the FutureLearn Academic Network section (FLAN Day) of the 38th Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) conference. For full details, see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/3004
Quality Assurance and Innovation: Case Studies of Massive Open Online Courses...FutureLearn FLAN
Presented by Ahmed Al-Imarah of the University of Bath at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK on 15 June 2017. This presentation formed part of the FutureLearn Academic Network section (FLAN Day) of the 38th Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) conference. For full details, see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/3004
Conducting Research in Blended and Online EducationTanya Joosten
A workshop at #WCET15 in Denver, CO
This hands-on workshop consists of practice-based research planning activities to help you prepare for conducting research at the course or program level. Specifically, we will utilize the distance education research model developed by the National Research Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements (DETA) to guide the development of research plans for blended and online. Attendees will walk away with a research agenda and the necessary tools to help them conduct research on their campus as part of the National DETA Research Center initiative. The DETA Center looks to identify and evaluate effective course and institutional practices in online learning (including competency-based education) for underrepresented individuals (i.e., economically disadvantaged, adult learners, disabled) through rigorous research. This workshop will prepare attendees to take a plan back to their own institution to successfully gather research on blended and online teaching and learning. For more on DETA, visit http://www.uwm.edu/deta. The workshop will span two concurrent session blocks- part I, 1:30 - 2:30 p.m. and part II, 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. Bring your laptop or mobile device.
http://wcetconference.wiche.edu/sessions/conducting-research-blended-and-online
Effectiveness of Blended and Online ProgramsTanya Joosten
My portion of the preso from:
Join Malcolm Brown, EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative director, and Veronica Diaz, ELI associate director, as they moderate this special two-hour webinar hosted by the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative and Quality Matters. This webinar will provide you with examples and tools to craft plans that measure the effectiveness of your online/blended instructional programs and their impact on student learning and success. You will explore rubrics, hear about institutional efforts, and engage in activities that relate to quality assurance work. The purpose of the event is to understand some approaches to measure the effectiveness of online/blended learning programs:
Learn about national research efforts on quality assurance in online/blended environments
Gather ideas on demonstrating the efficacy of your online/blended learning implementations
Consider approaches for measuring the impact of online/blended programs within a specific institutional context
http://www.educause.edu/events/eli-webinar-measuring-effectiveness-onlineblended-programs
The session explored two of the recurring themes in the MOOC research literature (a) the potential of MOOCs for universities and teaching practice and (b) the quality of MOOCs and their relationship to higher education curricula and learning design. In our research we were particularly interested in the impact of MOOCs on teaching practice, and the reuse of MOOC content by teaching practitioners. We reported on our investigation of interviewing MOOC programme leaders and tutors on the broad issue of transfer of innovation from MOOCs into teaching practice. Our claim is that MOOCs can play a potentially significant role in innovating practice and curriculum design. Our findings reveal that this impact can be direct when MOOCs are embedded in the distance learning curriculum. Interestingly, when the impact is indirect and unintended, learning design features of MOOCs challenge and enrich ‘traditional’ and more established teaching practices in distance learning environments. In blended learning, the influence is on campus practices, e.g. introducing MOOC attributes into campus classes and reviewing assessment.
Teaching in MOOCs: Unbundling the roles of the educatorRebecca Ferguson
Teaching in MOOCs: Unbundling the roles of the educator, a presentation given at the design4learning conference at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK by Rebecca Ferguson (co-authored with Denise Whitelock) on 26 November 2014.
Promoting Effective Teaching and Learning Ecosystems via Research Proven Prac...Tanya Joosten
ELI Leadership Seminar, 2016, San Antonio TX
The ELI Leadership Seminar, "Promoting a Sustainable and Effective Teaching and Learning Ecosystem via Research Proven Practice," is an extended learning opportunity threaded throughout the annual meeting program. The goals for this seminar are to:
Enable quality teaching and learning through evidence-based faculty development to diffuse proven instructional interventions and practices
Discover ways to gather evidence using a research model for online learning, including key research questions driving inquiry
Explore different research designs (experimental and survey with data mining) for studying teaching and learning innovations
Develop a research plan for your program or institution that will assist in identifying effective instructional and institutional practices in blended and online learning
Identify potential methods of effectively engaging faculty in teaching and researching innovations in student learning
Learn about institutional mechanisms that can impact quality in teaching and learning, particularly in blended and online environments
Enable participants to network with peers interested in promoting effective teaching and learning through research on blended and online programming at universities
Participants, both new and experienced, will benefit from peer interaction and the opportunity to network and engage with leaders during small group discussions. Participants will meet with, share with, and learn from a cohort of peers from a wide range of positions supporting teaching and learning from different types of higher education institutions.
OLC Innovate: Why Isn’t There More Cross-Institutional Research?Tanya Joosten
Why Isn’t There More Cross-Institutional Research?
Date: Thursday, April 19th
Time: 8:45 AM to 9:30 AM
Conference Session: Concurrent Session 4
Lead Presenter: Tanya Joosten (University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee)
Co-presenters: Rachel Cusatis (National Center for Distance Education and Technological Advancements), Lindsey Harness (Distance Education and Technological Advancements)
Track: Research: Designs, Methods, and Findings
Location: Belmont A
Session Duration: 45min
Brief Abstract:
After conducting seven cross-institutional research studies in online learning and competency-based education, we will share what we have learned in the process and discuss ways to advance cross-institutional research.
Critical issues in contemporary open education researchRobert Farrow
This presentation outlines some key considerations for researchers working in the fields of open education, OER and MOOC. Key lines of debate in the open education movement will be described and critically assessed. A reflective overview of the award-winning OER Research Hub project will be used to frame several key considerations around the methodology and purpose of OER research (including 'impact' and 'open practices'). These will be compared with results from a 2016 OER Hub consultation with key stakeholders in the open education movement on research priorities for the sector. The presentation will conclude with thoughts on the potential for openness to act as a disruptive force in higher education.
Application of Significance Tests to Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)FutureLearn FLAN
Presented by Simon Coton and Steve Cayzer of the University of Bath at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK on 15 June 2017. This presentation formed part of the FutureLearn Academic Network section (FLAN Day) of the 38th Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) conference. For full details, see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/3004
CDE-funded Teaching and Research Award project "Identifying Effective Formative Assessment Practices and Feedback Processes: Lecturer and Student Experiences", as displayed at RIDE 2010 conference.
Lead researcher Dr. Stylianos Hatzipanagos(stylianos.hatzipanagos@kcl.ac.uk, King's College London).
What are the expectations of disabled learners when participating in MOOCs?FutureLearn FLAN
Presented by Francisco Iniesto, Patrick McAndrew, Shailey Minocha and Tim Coughlan of The Open University at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK on 15 June 2017. This presentation formed part of the FutureLearn Academic Network section (FLAN Day) of the 38th Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) conference. For full details, see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/3004
Land of The Learning Giants: The Rise of MOOCsEamon Costello
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been heralded and decried in something of equal measure over the last four years. Their ultimate purpose and the effect they are having are still uncertain but given the level of maturity that has now reached we ought now to be able to attempt to answer some questions of this phenomenon. Following an overview of key issues for educational research on the topic of MOOCs this paper presents findings from studies we have conducted into
* Representations of MOOCs in the Irish Print Media: What are the narratives, who is telling it and why?
* Quality of education in MOOCs in particular regarding online testing
* The strategic drivers for higher education institutions in Ireland to develop MOOCs
Presentation given at SCONUL 2014, the summer conference of The Society of College, National and University Libraries, Glasgow, June 2014. The presentation focuses on frequently asked questions (FAQs) about learning analytics, with the emphasis on the role and perspective of libraries in this area.
What does educators' engagement with MOOC discussions look like?FutureLearn FLAN
Presented by Fereshte Goshtasbpour of the University of Leeds at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK on 15 June 2017. This presentation formed part of the FutureLearn Academic Network section (FLAN Day) of the 38th Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) conference. For full details, see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/3004
Quality Assurance and Innovation: Case Studies of Massive Open Online Courses...FutureLearn FLAN
Presented by Ahmed Al-Imarah of the University of Bath at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK on 15 June 2017. This presentation formed part of the FutureLearn Academic Network section (FLAN Day) of the 38th Computers and Learning Research Group (CALRG) conference. For full details, see http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/3004
Open, Share, Learn: The University of Michigan's Open Educational ResourcesEmily Puckett Rodgers
The Open.Michigan initiative provides a platform for faculty, students and staff to share their educational resources and research with the world. This initiative operates on the principles that universities have a responsibility to share the knowledge and resources they create, as well as, provide the transparency necessary for the health and growth of educational institutions. As faculty and academic communities become aware of the opportunities for innovation, sharing and collaboration afforded by OER, they will incorporate these practices more fully into their everyday processes.
This presentation is designed to provide faculty members at the University of Michigan and beyond with the tools and knowledge to recognize copyrighted content, search for and use openly licensed content, license their own content and publish this content as Open Educational Resources
Guest lecture delivered to the Master of Leadership in Open Education programme at the University of Nova Gorica, Slovenia. An overiew of more than 10 years working on open education research projects is reviewed and the relation between research and policy explored. Responses are made to questions raised by students.
This presentation is licensed CC BY - any logos or other images are included under fair use or assumed public domain.
EMMA Summer School - Rebecca Ferguson - Learning design and learning analytic...EUmoocs
This hands-on workshop will work with learning design tools and with massive open online courses (MOOCs) on the FutureLearn platform to explore how learning design can be used to influence the choice and design of learning analytics. This workshop will be of interest to people who are involved in the design or presentation of online courses, and to those who want to find out more about learning design, learning analytics or MOOCs. Participants will find it helpful to have registered for FutureLearn and explored the platform for a short time in advance of the workshop.
This presentation was given during the EMMA Summer School, that took place in Ischia (Italy) on 4-11 July 2015.
More info on the website: http://project.europeanmoocs.eu/project/get-involved/summer-school/
Follow our MOOCs: http://platform.europeanmoocs.eu/MOOCs
Design and deliver your MOOC with EMMA: http://project.europeanmoocs.eu/project/get-involved/become-an-emma-mooc-provider/
The Chinese National Top Level Courses Project - using Open Educational Resou...Stian Håklev
Presentation as part of the CIDE seminar series, OISE, University of Toronto, 23/3//2010. Audio available here: http://www.archive.org/details/TheChineseNationalTopLevelCoursesProject-UsingOpenEducational
EMMA Summer School - Rebecca Ferguson - Learning design and learning analytic...EUmoocs
This hands-on workshop will work with learning design tools and with massive open online courses (MOOCs) on the FutureLearn platform to explore how learning design can be used to influence the choice and design of learning analytics. This workshop will be of interest to people who are involved in the design or presentation of online courses, and to those who want to find out more about learning design, learning analytics or MOOCs. Participants will find it helpful to have registered for FutureLearn and explored the platform for a short time in advance of the workshop.
This presentation was given during the EMMA Summer School, that took place in Ischia (Italy) on 4-11 July 2015.
More info on the website: http://project.europeanmoocs.eu/project/get-involved/summer-school/
Follow our MOOCs: http://platform.europeanmoocs.eu/MOOCs
Design and deliver your MOOC with EMMA: http://project.europeanmoocs.eu/project/get-involved/become-an-emma-mooc-provider/
2018-08-23 EARLI Conference in Bonn Quality Reference Framework for MOOCs Str...Christian M. Stracke
2018-08-23 Paper Presentation at EARLI SIG 6-7 Conference in Bonn on The Quality Reference Framework for MOOCs by Christian M. Stracke and Esther Tan from OUNL
Open learning in higher education an institutional approachBrian Murphy
The vaue of open learning can be a conflict within higher education instituions. This presentation is the result of an instituional review and research on the open education movement in higher education, given greater impetus by the advent of the MOOC. The journey of exploring MOOCs resulted, ironically, in an enhanced apreciation of OERs and revised strategic thinking of their impact for teaching and research, especially when viewed as a vehicle of co-creation between staff and students. Once value is attached, the principle becimes embedded and accepted rarher than an additional burden of academic endeavour; and the door is opened to the business case for systems, investment and development as well as academic development, support, reward and recognition.
Seminar given at EduCause 2008 on how OpenCourseWare can help institutions meet their goals. Presentation given by Terri Bays, Dan Carchidi, and Sunnie Kim.
2019-07-09 Quality and Future of Open Education and MOOCs - Keynote at IEC201...Christian M. Stracke
2019-07-09 Quality and Future of Open Education and MOOCs - Invited Keynote at 10th International E-Learning Conference 2019 in Bangkok by Christian M. Stracke, OUNL
20160413 OE Global Conference Open Education Revolution or MOOCs Christian M....Christian M. Stracke
Is Open Education a Revolution or are MOOCs only marketing instruments? Paper presentation and speech at OE Global Conference 2016 in Krakow by Dr. Christian M. Stracke (OUNL)
The production of open courses as a transformative practice: A case study of ...Stian Håklev
Invited presentation given at OpenCourseWare Consortium Global Meeting 2011 in Cambridge, MA, in May. The whole thesis and more information can be accessed here: http://reganmian.net/top-level-courses
20160415 MIEF Free Education Open Learning Christian M. StrackeChristian M. Stracke
Free Education for Open Learning: Open educational policies, strategies and access for all - Speech at UNESCO Conference at International Education Fair 2016 in Moscow by Dr. Christian. M. Stracke (OUNL)
Science of Team Science 2013: Regional Networks to Stimulate Multi-directiona...Kathleen Ludewig Omollo
Presentation to Science of Team Science conference at Northwestern University on June 25, 2013 as part of panel "Collaboration between Developed and Developing Countries Offers Opportunities to Amplify Global Health Research."
Downloadable versions of the slides (in PPT and PDF) format as well as presenter notes are available at: http://open.umich.edu/node/7377/.
Fostering Creativity in Learning: How to Effectively Incorporate OERs into As...Alexandra M. Pickett
This 2-part presentation will present practical strategies for implementing OER in the design of course assignments and is intended to contribute to an ongoing discussion aimed at:
Use and reuse existing OERs.
Effective implementation of OERs into current teaching models
Assessing OER effectiveness and sustainability in course assignments.
But Were We Successful: Using Online Asynchronous Focus Groups to Evaluate Li...Andrea Payant
USU launched a program in 2016 to connect researchers seeking federal funding with librarians to assist them with data management. This program assisted over 100 researchers, but was it successful? Our presentation will discuss how we evaluated the success of this program using online asynchronous focus groups (OAFG) in conjunction with a traditional survey. Our cross-institutional research team will share our findings as well as the challenges and successes of using OAFGs to assess library services.
Similar to Measuring Our Impact: The Open.Michigan Initiative (20)
Online Learning Objects: Affecting Change through Cross-Disciplinary Practi...Emily Puckett Rodgers
For the past three years, the MELO project has brought together faculty from several gateway courses at U-M. These courses can be huge with hundreds of students per semester in a single class or smaller, more intimate classes. So how can we innovate across these spaces? We can share.
Training to Marketing and Communications members of MICHR and Medical research at the University of Michigan. Topics covered: how we share today, shared interests between African Health OER Network/Open.Michigan and MICHR, how to use Creative Commons licenses and upload content to SlideShare.
Open.Michigan conducted a training in May 2012 to educate the marketing team of the International Institute how to use Creative Commons licensed images in their work.
A presentation to the San Jose State University Library faculty and staff about the Open.Michigan initiative and how it ties into supporting access to low/no cost resources in the classroom and focuses on participation in education.
A presentation introducing CalState members to the Open.Michigan initiative and examining its varying community engagement strategies over the first three years.
These slides represent my part on a panel discussing the intersection of cyberinfrastructure, open practices and digital humanities at the second annual Cyberinfrastructure Days at the University of Michigan.
Panel participants included Dr. Paul Conway, Shana Kimball, Korey Jackson and Julie T. Klein. The other presentation materials can be found at: http://prezi.com/wbbvzvlzjc4c/introducing-digital-humanities-ci-days
Training session notes from my presentation to the MELO project group. This group is part of the local chapter of MERLOT contributors at the University of Michigan. We are creating new collections of Learning Objects and incorporating them into several gateway courses at the University.
Sharing with Others: An Introduction to Open Education ResourcesEmily Puckett Rodgers
Presentation materials for the 2011 Computers and Writing conference at the University of Michigan. Presentation on May 21, 2011. Session E06- Panel "Copyright Issues in Online Learning"
How to create OER workshop held on December 9, 2010. Presentation Open.Michigan featuring student content from members of the Student Handbook for Global Engagement. Workshop details and resource can be found at:https://open.umich.edu/wiki/Create_OER_Workshop
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Measuring Our Impact: The Open.Michigan Initiative
1. Measuring our Impact: The Open.Michigan Initiative CC: BY-NC-SA, Choconancy1Flickr Emily Puckett Rodgers Open Education Coordinator, Open.Michigan OpenCourseWare Consortium Global Meeting 2011 Except where otherwise noted, this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Copyright 2011 The Regents of the University of Michigan
5. Evaluation Design “Through a combination of existing and new qualitative (including surveys, interviews and user feedback) and quantitative (including web analytics, published resources) data, we aim to measure Open.Michigan’s impact on the University of Michigan campus and on the broader open education landscape, as well as its progress toward overall objectives and mission.” Mission and Objectives Environmental Scans Review Implementation Document Study and Review Analysis Organizational analyses Research development and deployment
12. Strategic Vision Open.Michigan’s Strategic Vision Open.Michigan enables University of Michigan faculty, students, staff and others to share their educational resources and research with the world. Open.Michigan’s efforts contribute to two primary goals: to sustain a thriving culture of sharing knowledge at U-M to provide comprehensive public access to all of U-M’s scholarly output http://tinyurl.com/openmichiganvision
46. Ghana Emergency Medicine Collaborative“Having the big block M on a lot of high quality produced teaching modules that are made available to the world… is mission consistent, so what’s the business that we’re in here? We create and distribute knowledge.” -Paul Courant, “Why Open is Important” interview
47. Impact: Surveys CTools survey 40.7% instructors never heard of OCW 75.6% students never heard of OCW http://tinyurl.com/ctools2010survey
63. Advisory committeeIn the next three years, Open.Michigan will: Producemore and richer content as OER with the various campus units, improve modularity, instructional design, and accessibility of U-M OER Increase the visibility and discoverability of U-M resources through a combination of marketing and metadata Draw participants from more parts of campus to expand its disciplinary coverage Ensure OER production is an embeddedpart of the academic life on campus
>2007 pilot; 2008 launch >UMMS (Office of Enabling Tech) and School of Info>2008 launch, UMMS with goal of making first 2 years of medical school content openly licensed.>small staff (currently 4 full time); needed student (volunteer centric approach) support> Large research institution with ~40,000 students and a very distributed academic system across units; 3 campusesUMMS 1,100 students; LSA 19,000
>Start using Google Analytics and start doing systematic and consistent surveys and evaluations for our work. >Phase One: Define the mission and objectives of Open.Michigan >Phase Two: Conduct environmental scan of other Evaluations in Open Education >Phase Three: Complete inventory and review of internal documents Develop analyses such as PEST and SWOT >Phase Four: Formulate and implement strategy; Develop survey tools>Phase Five: Distribute survey Analyze data and synthesize results
>Analysis of production, impact, and external knowledge of the open materials created>Other orgs doing similar things (government, institution and nonprofit orgs; OCW & OER)> Qualitative: questionnaires, surveys, interviews for qualitative data, and focusing almost entirely on >Quantitative: web analytics>Analyzed: the production of open material, the use (impact) of open material, and knowledge and opinion of the open materials provided by those outside of the providing organization itself. Overall: >>ISKME case study frameworks and “Adoption and Use of Open Textbooks” >>CIC Open Access awareness environmental scan, 2010>>Open Learning Initiative activities>>Open Learning Network activities>>Atkins, Brown et. al. “A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges and New Opportunities” Hewlett report 2007>>Surveys, analytics, follow up and logs.>NSSE report on student engagement>CIBER report on social media use >OER/OCW specific evaluations: >>Tufts: site users who were also faculty members Tufts OCW “positively affects their teaching practices by providing additional teaching materials, by enabling them to integrate Tufts materials into their courses, by increasing their knowledge levels in certain areas and impact how course materials are developed by emphasizing instructional technology.”>>MIT: Self-reports and analyses showed that educators, students, and self-learners alike all use OCW & satisfied by the content available, and the same survey show high impact on their learning goals>>Wikiwijs (Dutch government OER) peer review and recommendation system
>Vision document: outlines formalized and explicit mission and goals for Open.Michigan>Priorities for future growth and a three-year plan. >Created in tandem with determining the outcomes that we could measure. Future Growth:Increase support for OER productionExpand and improve OER offeringsAdd value to content and services
> 3 platforms have hosted our content over the past few years: 1) eduCommons: hosted all our OER there2) /education: site-integrated (static Open.Michigan pages) eduCommons instance of OER.3) OERbiteverything is hosted on our Drupal instance including static pages and OER; our wiki and blog are also measureable. >Look at all Google Analytics reports to get full picture of growth. >Referring sites over past 3 yearswikipediayoutubefacebook>First year: local medical gateways and large entities like creative commons and ocwc>Second year: traffic from international sites in china and India as well as social sites like facebook and twitter>Third year: getting more traffic from a variety of sites including ocwc, other oer sites like einztein and project sites
5/3/10-5/3/11: 77,808 visitsover 12,000 are from the Ann Arbor areaover 31,000 are internationally based >Site visits: Coming from 127 countries; China, India and Great Britain being the largest. >Downloads 1231 (last year): syllabi; and pdfs.
>Steadily grown in resources: most in SI and UMMS where we have strongest ties.>M1/M2 sequences being published at a regular rate (32% published as of late 2010, must get permission and clear material); now piloting synching audio from lectures to our cleared slides with good results. >dScribes to date: 69 graduate students2 undergraduate students1 librarian 1 staff member 1 visiting scholardScribes have assisted Open.Michigan and 41 faculty in publishing 39 courses
>Investment (financial resources, staff, admin support) devoted to OER production and development>Have good horizontal investment and some support from high administration but need more Examples of support: >SI (we are a preferred employer, invited to participate in local events to recruit students, use their space, heavily recruit from their cohort for employees and volunteers 2008-2011)>Library (coordinate activities, co-facilitate events, participate in local activities with them 2010-2011)>MERLOT (2011) joint collaboration on grant funded projects>Global Reach (share information and facilitate each other’s activities) 2010-2011
>Survey results: supportRespondents ambivalent about participating in Open.Michigan efforts (mostly in the neutral or “agree” categories) >Surveys based on environmental scan of other evals, CTools survey, own community interest >CTools survey>>U-M’s Sakai LMS>>2007-2010 had OCW/Open.Michigan questions> Our survey>>all students, all faculty and staff units that support teaching and learning) >>survey about 20 questions, measured sharing habits (do you share, with whom do you share , awareness of and use of OER, social comparison (I would share “if” and support of Open.Michigan)>>Awareness, Value, Use 2010 Results: >Mostly neutral in their responses to OER use and impact (students and instructors)
>Administered via email>Staff included: technology, instruction and design Staff respondents were heavily from the libraries, which may have heard of us more than other staff units across campus Of the surveys, the staff is our least confident survey sample size and response rate.Sharing habits (what, with whom, why)Awareness of Open.Michigan and OERUse of OER (why, how, with whom, create or use?)Impact of OER (in teaching, learning or professional development)Support of OER efforts and Open.MichiganAwareness Students>94% students don’t know about Open.Michigan>84% students never heard of OER >Validity testing: Haven’t heard of OER (1409) vs Heard of/Used/Created OER (256): significantly more students have not even heard of OER than those who have heard of, used or created OER combined. Faculty>82% faculty don’t know about Open.Michigan>79% faculty never heard of OER>>121 never heard of; 73 heard of/used/created Staff79% staff don’t know about Open.Michigan55% staff never heard of OER
>Faculty share lecture slides 79% of the time; syllabi 63% of the time >Staff share reading resources 72% of the time; lecture slides 32% of the time otherwise they share data, administrative information or communications. >Students are mostly sharing on google docs, websites or dropbox: posting to networks (closed) or openly online
Lecture slides, syllabi, assignments most popular used/viewed/adapted by faculty and students. Faculty >Faculty: Viewing how other faculty in my area are approaching materials (32.4%) >Faculty: Encourage colleagues to publish on Open.Michigan (43.9%)> 45.8% use course materials themselves > 37.5% publish their course materials on Open.Michigan >> Used lecture slides from individual lectures in all three categories - viewing, downloading, and adapting. >> Use of OER as a database of resources >> Syllabi and assignments viewed more often than they were downloaded or adapted> Assignments were adopted almost as many times (8) as they were viewed (13) Students >Students: previewing prospective courses in depth before I register (35%) >Students: 56.5% would use course material from Open.Michigan > 49.3% would encourage other students to use course material on Open.Michigan > 22.2% would support the publishing process >>Students heavier on the use/viewing side of OER use and less on the adapting side. >>Individual lecture slides (also 1st by far), syllabi (2nd by a good margin), and assignments, the fourth most popular option. >E-textbooks proved to be more popular among students than databases of resources > Most popular OER: individual lecture slides (the most popular among both groups), syllabi and assignments.
- Indeed making an impact but at a mid-level of administrative support and in the broader national/international open education landscape.Still need to work on education about the benefits of OER use and production in the classroom and in learning settings. Still need to work on getting a simple, clear message across to our faculty, students and staff who create learning resources and who use them. Positive results from dScribes, where they use OER more, understand copyright law better, and understand how to use open licenses. They have also reported learning results (being better prepared for courses, tests or learning how to study better through this process) (dScribe exit interviews 07-08 Medical survey).This is what the people want: the set of actionable items. Use words like:Free ShareableAdaptableAttributablePublicNot: Open Educational Resources or “distributable”Staff Staff did not seem to show a preference for one kind of OER use over another. They do, however, appear to view OER much more than they download and/or adapt them.
>Overall what we’re finding aligns with the vision statement we created. >Future Growth:Increase support for OER productionExpand and improve OER offeringsAdd value to content and services >Ongoing evaluation: tailored to the interests and needs of our community>Based on the feedback from the surveys: focus on delivering a clear, consistent message and making OER that is directly useful to our community.>Closing the Loop- continue analysis and determine if our assessments are making a difference and making sure we implement changes that are based in community interests and needs.
>Awareness of Open.Michigan and OER>Refine survey questions/make simpler >Biggest comment and feedback was “I still don’t know what you do or what OER is!” (mostly from students). > Scope our impact research closer to individual communities and thus focus groups>Not a research unit: a practice and research unit: balance good thought with action. Use of our data >Google Analytics: developing a module in OERbit to show this information to others>Aggregate survey results: available on request