This document discusses the legal basis and priorities for developing EU policy on rare diseases and health surveillance. Key points include:
1) Article 152 of the EU Treaty provides the legal basis for EU action in public health, including programs on rare diseases.
2) Priorities have included exchanging information through networks, developing strategies for coordination, and supporting research collaborations.
3) The Commission Communication and Council Recommendation on rare diseases aim to establish an integrated EU approach through non-binding coordination rather than legislation.
The document outlines the European Union's actions and priorities in the field of rare diseases. Key points include:
- Establishing a definition of rare diseases and improving disease classification.
- Supporting national plans and strategies for rare diseases in EU member states.
- Developing networks of centers of expertise and establishing European reference networks.
- Improving access to information, diagnosis, treatment and care for rare disease patients across Europe.
- Accelerating research and ensuring access to orphan drugs for rare diseases.
2009 Convegno Malattie Rare Lipucci Di Paola [22 01]cmid
Eurordis is a non-profit organization representing over 700 rare disease patient groups across Europe. It was founded in 1997 to represent the voice of rare disease patients at the European level and improve access to treatment and care. Eurordis has over 345 member organizations in 38 countries and advocates for policies to promote research on rare diseases and increase availability of orphan drugs.
Pharmacovigilance is the science of monitoring the effects of medicines after they have been licensed for use, in order to identify new risks or risks that were previously unknown. The World Health Organization established an international drug monitoring program in 1961 after the thalidomide tragedy. The Uppsala Monitoring Centre was established as the WHO collaborating center for pharmacovigilance in 1978. The Pharmacovigilance Programme of India was started in 2010 to monitor adverse drug reactions in the Indian population and ensure the benefits of medicines outweigh the risks.
This document provides an overview of pharmacovigilance in India, including:
- The history of pharmacovigilance efforts in India from 1986 to the present.
- The objectives and goals of the current Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI), including establishing a nationwide safety reporting system and expanding electronic reporting.
- The roles and responsibilities of stakeholders like the National Coordinating Center, Advisory Monitoring Centers, and CDSCO in the PvPI.
Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI)Jamshed Ahmad
Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) was initiated in July 2010 to monitor adverse drug reactions in India. It is coordinated by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization and has a National Coordination Centre located at the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. The objectives of PvPI are to create a nationwide patient safety reporting system, analyze benefit-risk ratios of medicines, and support regulatory decision making. MAMC has established an ADR Monitoring Centre as part of PvPI, which has reported over 135 cases and monitors reactions to drugs like ceftriaxone, dapsone, and phenytoin.
The document discusses India's national pharmacovigilance programs. It was launched in 2010 by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation to safeguard public health by monitoring adverse drug reactions. The program is coordinated by the National Coordinating Centre at AIIMS which oversees adverse event reporting from Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centers across India and shares data with the WHO's Uppsala Monitoring Centre for the global database. The pharmacovigilance program aims to improve patient safety by monitoring drug safety and reducing risks from medication use.
A brief description about Pharmacovigilance, aims and scope, need of pharmacovigilance, programs by WHO for international drug safety monitoring, UMC, VIGIBASE, WHO causality assessment scale and specific regulatory bodies of various countries
The document outlines the European Union's actions and priorities in the field of rare diseases. Key points include:
- Establishing a definition of rare diseases and improving disease classification.
- Supporting national plans and strategies for rare diseases in EU member states.
- Developing networks of centers of expertise and establishing European reference networks.
- Improving access to information, diagnosis, treatment and care for rare disease patients across Europe.
- Accelerating research and ensuring access to orphan drugs for rare diseases.
2009 Convegno Malattie Rare Lipucci Di Paola [22 01]cmid
Eurordis is a non-profit organization representing over 700 rare disease patient groups across Europe. It was founded in 1997 to represent the voice of rare disease patients at the European level and improve access to treatment and care. Eurordis has over 345 member organizations in 38 countries and advocates for policies to promote research on rare diseases and increase availability of orphan drugs.
Pharmacovigilance is the science of monitoring the effects of medicines after they have been licensed for use, in order to identify new risks or risks that were previously unknown. The World Health Organization established an international drug monitoring program in 1961 after the thalidomide tragedy. The Uppsala Monitoring Centre was established as the WHO collaborating center for pharmacovigilance in 1978. The Pharmacovigilance Programme of India was started in 2010 to monitor adverse drug reactions in the Indian population and ensure the benefits of medicines outweigh the risks.
This document provides an overview of pharmacovigilance in India, including:
- The history of pharmacovigilance efforts in India from 1986 to the present.
- The objectives and goals of the current Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI), including establishing a nationwide safety reporting system and expanding electronic reporting.
- The roles and responsibilities of stakeholders like the National Coordinating Center, Advisory Monitoring Centers, and CDSCO in the PvPI.
Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI)Jamshed Ahmad
Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) was initiated in July 2010 to monitor adverse drug reactions in India. It is coordinated by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization and has a National Coordination Centre located at the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. The objectives of PvPI are to create a nationwide patient safety reporting system, analyze benefit-risk ratios of medicines, and support regulatory decision making. MAMC has established an ADR Monitoring Centre as part of PvPI, which has reported over 135 cases and monitors reactions to drugs like ceftriaxone, dapsone, and phenytoin.
The document discusses India's national pharmacovigilance programs. It was launched in 2010 by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation to safeguard public health by monitoring adverse drug reactions. The program is coordinated by the National Coordinating Centre at AIIMS which oversees adverse event reporting from Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Centers across India and shares data with the WHO's Uppsala Monitoring Centre for the global database. The pharmacovigilance program aims to improve patient safety by monitoring drug safety and reducing risks from medication use.
A brief description about Pharmacovigilance, aims and scope, need of pharmacovigilance, programs by WHO for international drug safety monitoring, UMC, VIGIBASE, WHO causality assessment scale and specific regulatory bodies of various countries
This document discusses focussed pharmacovigilance, which involves intensified adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting within a defined cohort. It provides examples of focussed pharmacovigilance projects in Uganda and Kenya. The Uganda project monitored renal toxicities related to tenofovir use and ADRs related to zidovudine use in adults with HIV infection at specific regional pharmacovigilance clinics. The Kenya project at AMPATH focused on treatment-threatening ADRs to antiretrovirals (ARVs) across multiple HIV treatment sites. The benefits of focussed pharmacovigilance include utilizing existing reporting infrastructure and targeting specific medicines or patient groups, while limitations include potential under-
The document discusses pharmacovigilance in India. It provides an overview of clinical trials in India, the history and programs of pharmacovigilance in the country, and current status of the Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PVPI). The PVPI aims to improve ADR reporting and monitoring across India through establishing ADR monitoring centers, but still faces challenges of underreporting and lack of nationwide awareness.
This document discusses adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance in India. It provides background on the pharmaceutical industry in India and defines adverse drug reactions and events. It describes the origins of pharmacovigilance from past drug safety issues. It outlines the various adverse drug reaction reporting centers in India and discusses the importance of pharmacovigilance for public health. It also covers communication in pharmacovigilance, roles and responsibilities, and challenges to the system in India.
This document discusses the history and current state of pharmacovigilance in India and internationally. It describes key events in pharmacovigilance including the establishment of drug safety monitoring committees in the UK and US in the 1960s, the creation of the yellow card system in the UK, and the founding of the Uppsala Monitoring Centre by the WHO in 1968. It outlines India's contribution to the WHO pharmacovigilance program, noting that India was the 7th highest contributor of safety reports to the global database in 2013. The document also provides guidance on what types of adverse drug reactions should be reported in India.
TIMELINE
PHARMACOVIGILANCE STAKEHOLDERS
ERMS – RECOMMENDATIONS 2005 – KEY CHANGES
2006 CONSULTATIONS – 2008 PROPOSALS
NEW DIRECTIVE 2010/84/EU
PHARMACOVIGILANCE
New regulation (EC) No 726/2004
PHARMACOVIGILANCE OF HUMAN MPs
PHARMACOVIGILANCE OF VETERINARY MPS
MILESTONES 2011-2012
REGULATION (EU) 520/2012
ICH GUIDELINES
GPvP GUIDELINES
MILESTONES – FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
Pharmacovigilance aims to detect, assess, monitor, understand, and prevent adverse drug reactions. It has evolved over time in response to drug safety issues. Key events include the Thalidomide disaster in the 1960s which led to clinical trials, and the establishment of reporting systems in the UK, US, and Europe. India launched its national pharmacovigilance program in 2010 to monitor adverse drug reactions, but progress in expanding monitoring centers has been slow. Increased funding and commitment are needed to fully establish nationwide pharmacovigilance in India.
The Pharmacovigilance Program in India (PvPI) was initiated in July 2010 by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) in New Delhi to monitor adverse drug reactions. The program aims to ensure the benefits of medicine use outweigh the risks by monitoring adverse reactions. It operates through a network of ADR monitoring centers across India which report adverse reactions using the Vigiflow reporting system. The program is coordinated by the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission and overseen by steering and advisory committees with technical support from review panels. The program has expanded over the years to include more monitoring centers and now also includes haemovigilance and biovigilance programs.
Providing timely, evidence-based information on the safe and effective use of medicines, facilitating changes to healthcare practices, supporting risk minimization behavior.
This document discusses pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions. It defines pharmacovigilance as monitoring drug safety and adverse effects to identify hazards and prevent harm. Adverse drug reactions are unintended drug effects, while side effects are related to a drug's pharmacological properties. Reporting adverse reactions is important to minimize harm and economic costs. Healthcare workers should report all suspected adverse reactions using the national guidelines and tools, including a yellow form to document patient details and reaction severity. Online reporting is also available.
The document summarizes key points about pharmacovigilance from an industry perspective. It discusses the historical milestones that demonstrated the importance of pharmacovigilance. It then describes pharmacovigilance processes, including adverse event reporting, signal detection, and risk management plans. Finally, it outlines the new EU legislation's aim to strengthen and rationalize the EU pharmacovigilance system through requirements for pharmacovigilance systems and increased transparency.
What you need to know about the Pharmacovigilance guidelines for companies marketing drugs in India. A concise overview of the six modules in the Guidance Document and the responsibilities of the Marketing Authorization Holders.
The document summarizes key points about the WHO International Nonproprietary Name (INN) Programme:
- The INN Programme assigns a single international nonproprietary name to pharmaceutical substances to ensure consistency worldwide and promote safe use of medicines globally.
- It aims to develop, establish, and promote international standards for naming pharmaceutical and biological products, including biotherapeutics.
- There is an ongoing discussion around developing a system for distinguishing biosimilar products through INN naming to promote unambiguous identification of reference products globally.
The WHO plays several key roles in pharmaceutical management:
1) It issues norms and standards through expert committees and supports regulatory capacity building for drug regulation.
2) It ensures quality of essential medicines through prequalification programs.
3) It facilitates information exchange between countries on drug safety and efficacy through tools like the International Conference of Drug Regulatory Authorities and a network of national drug information officers.
This document provides an overview of pharmacovigilance and the Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI). It defines pharmacovigilance as the science of detecting, assessing, understanding, and preventing adverse effects of medicines. The document outlines the historical events that led to the development of pharmacovigilance, including the sulfanilamide and thalidomide disasters. It describes the vision, mission, aims, and objectives of PvPI in India to improve patient safety related to medicine use. Key aspects of PvPI covered include adverse drug reaction reporting processes and the expansion of PvPI to include additional medical areas over time.
ROLE OF PHARMACOVIGILANCE AGAINST ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONAnindya Banerjee
The document discusses the role of pharmacovigilance in monitoring adverse drug reactions (ADRs). It summarizes that pharmacovigilance aims to improve drug safety by identifying ADRs from reported cases and analyzing benefit-risk ratios of medications. Historical drug disasters like thalidomide and sulfanilamide poisonings demonstrated the importance of post-market drug safety monitoring. The document outlines the objectives, reporting process, and future of pharmacovigilance in India including expanding stakeholder reporting and standardizing methodology.
This document discusses pharmacovigilance, which refers to monitoring drugs for adverse effects after they reach the market. It defines pharmacovigilance and notes that the WHO recommends every country establish a pharmacovigilance center to share adverse drug reaction data globally. Clinical trials involve fewer patients over a short time, whereas drugs are used by many more people long-term in clinical practice. Reporting adverse drug reactions helps prevent future harm and improve drug safety. Causality assessment methods like the Naranjo algorithm determine the likelihood a drug caused a reaction in a patient. India has established a national pharmacovigilance program to monitor adverse reactions and ensure drug safety.
Pharmacovigilance a general overview most updatedpeter donik
The document provides an overview of the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) and adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting. It defines key pharmacovigilance terminology and introduces PvPI, which aims to improve patient safety through ADR monitoring. PvPI has established 220 ADR Monitoring Centers to collect reports from healthcare professionals and consumers via forms or a mobile app. Reported ADRs are assessed for causality and signals to support regulatory decision making. The goal is rational medicine use and reducing health risks.
The Four Cornerstones of the Conscious Corporation - PresentationEuro RSCG Worldwide
This document discusses the rise of corporate power over the past 200+ years and increasing distrust in corporations due to scandals. However, consumers now expect more from corporations in terms of social responsibility. The document proposes four cornerstones of the "conscious corporation" of the future: 1) a purpose beyond profit, 2) a people-centered culture, 3) championing sustainability, and 4) respecting consumers' power. Examples of companies embracing these principles are provided. The rewards of cultivating a strong reputation through these means are discussed.
50 Years of the EU Commission's Extended ServiceDr Lendy Spires
The role of the delegations has changed constantly … they now carry out tasks relating to almost all the areas where the European Union has a part to play. This reflects the Union’s growing importance as a world global player.
President Prodi, September 2003 The European Union in the world The European Union is a unique experience of peaceful integration and cooperation between former rivals and competitors. Its process of unity was central to the economic and political history of Europe in the second half of the last century.
Its achievements today are impressive, and impossible to imagine only a few years ago: peace and stability have been consolidated; growth has been fostered; the well-being of EU citizens has substantially increased. The single currency is a historic success, and Community policies guarantee the safeguard of European principles and interests.
The EU is today, even before completion of the enlargement process, the world’s largest economic and trading partner, the largest donor of development assistance and the largest provider of humanitarian aid. It is also playing a crucial part in projecting stability around its periphery, notably through the process of further enlargement with central European and Mediterranean countries. In the external relations area, the EU is now moving forward to a European foreign policy that is properly linked to the EU institutions which manage the instruments needed for its accomplishment.
The European Commission plays a key role in the implementation of the EU’s foreign and other policies and in this it relies heavily 5 Taking Europe to the world — 50 years of the European Commission’s External Service
This document discusses focussed pharmacovigilance, which involves intensified adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting within a defined cohort. It provides examples of focussed pharmacovigilance projects in Uganda and Kenya. The Uganda project monitored renal toxicities related to tenofovir use and ADRs related to zidovudine use in adults with HIV infection at specific regional pharmacovigilance clinics. The Kenya project at AMPATH focused on treatment-threatening ADRs to antiretrovirals (ARVs) across multiple HIV treatment sites. The benefits of focussed pharmacovigilance include utilizing existing reporting infrastructure and targeting specific medicines or patient groups, while limitations include potential under-
The document discusses pharmacovigilance in India. It provides an overview of clinical trials in India, the history and programs of pharmacovigilance in the country, and current status of the Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PVPI). The PVPI aims to improve ADR reporting and monitoring across India through establishing ADR monitoring centers, but still faces challenges of underreporting and lack of nationwide awareness.
This document discusses adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance in India. It provides background on the pharmaceutical industry in India and defines adverse drug reactions and events. It describes the origins of pharmacovigilance from past drug safety issues. It outlines the various adverse drug reaction reporting centers in India and discusses the importance of pharmacovigilance for public health. It also covers communication in pharmacovigilance, roles and responsibilities, and challenges to the system in India.
This document discusses the history and current state of pharmacovigilance in India and internationally. It describes key events in pharmacovigilance including the establishment of drug safety monitoring committees in the UK and US in the 1960s, the creation of the yellow card system in the UK, and the founding of the Uppsala Monitoring Centre by the WHO in 1968. It outlines India's contribution to the WHO pharmacovigilance program, noting that India was the 7th highest contributor of safety reports to the global database in 2013. The document also provides guidance on what types of adverse drug reactions should be reported in India.
TIMELINE
PHARMACOVIGILANCE STAKEHOLDERS
ERMS – RECOMMENDATIONS 2005 – KEY CHANGES
2006 CONSULTATIONS – 2008 PROPOSALS
NEW DIRECTIVE 2010/84/EU
PHARMACOVIGILANCE
New regulation (EC) No 726/2004
PHARMACOVIGILANCE OF HUMAN MPs
PHARMACOVIGILANCE OF VETERINARY MPS
MILESTONES 2011-2012
REGULATION (EU) 520/2012
ICH GUIDELINES
GPvP GUIDELINES
MILESTONES – FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
Pharmacovigilance aims to detect, assess, monitor, understand, and prevent adverse drug reactions. It has evolved over time in response to drug safety issues. Key events include the Thalidomide disaster in the 1960s which led to clinical trials, and the establishment of reporting systems in the UK, US, and Europe. India launched its national pharmacovigilance program in 2010 to monitor adverse drug reactions, but progress in expanding monitoring centers has been slow. Increased funding and commitment are needed to fully establish nationwide pharmacovigilance in India.
The Pharmacovigilance Program in India (PvPI) was initiated in July 2010 by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) in New Delhi to monitor adverse drug reactions. The program aims to ensure the benefits of medicine use outweigh the risks by monitoring adverse reactions. It operates through a network of ADR monitoring centers across India which report adverse reactions using the Vigiflow reporting system. The program is coordinated by the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission and overseen by steering and advisory committees with technical support from review panels. The program has expanded over the years to include more monitoring centers and now also includes haemovigilance and biovigilance programs.
Providing timely, evidence-based information on the safe and effective use of medicines, facilitating changes to healthcare practices, supporting risk minimization behavior.
This document discusses pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions. It defines pharmacovigilance as monitoring drug safety and adverse effects to identify hazards and prevent harm. Adverse drug reactions are unintended drug effects, while side effects are related to a drug's pharmacological properties. Reporting adverse reactions is important to minimize harm and economic costs. Healthcare workers should report all suspected adverse reactions using the national guidelines and tools, including a yellow form to document patient details and reaction severity. Online reporting is also available.
The document summarizes key points about pharmacovigilance from an industry perspective. It discusses the historical milestones that demonstrated the importance of pharmacovigilance. It then describes pharmacovigilance processes, including adverse event reporting, signal detection, and risk management plans. Finally, it outlines the new EU legislation's aim to strengthen and rationalize the EU pharmacovigilance system through requirements for pharmacovigilance systems and increased transparency.
What you need to know about the Pharmacovigilance guidelines for companies marketing drugs in India. A concise overview of the six modules in the Guidance Document and the responsibilities of the Marketing Authorization Holders.
The document summarizes key points about the WHO International Nonproprietary Name (INN) Programme:
- The INN Programme assigns a single international nonproprietary name to pharmaceutical substances to ensure consistency worldwide and promote safe use of medicines globally.
- It aims to develop, establish, and promote international standards for naming pharmaceutical and biological products, including biotherapeutics.
- There is an ongoing discussion around developing a system for distinguishing biosimilar products through INN naming to promote unambiguous identification of reference products globally.
The WHO plays several key roles in pharmaceutical management:
1) It issues norms and standards through expert committees and supports regulatory capacity building for drug regulation.
2) It ensures quality of essential medicines through prequalification programs.
3) It facilitates information exchange between countries on drug safety and efficacy through tools like the International Conference of Drug Regulatory Authorities and a network of national drug information officers.
This document provides an overview of pharmacovigilance and the Pharmacovigilance Program of India (PvPI). It defines pharmacovigilance as the science of detecting, assessing, understanding, and preventing adverse effects of medicines. The document outlines the historical events that led to the development of pharmacovigilance, including the sulfanilamide and thalidomide disasters. It describes the vision, mission, aims, and objectives of PvPI in India to improve patient safety related to medicine use. Key aspects of PvPI covered include adverse drug reaction reporting processes and the expansion of PvPI to include additional medical areas over time.
ROLE OF PHARMACOVIGILANCE AGAINST ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONAnindya Banerjee
The document discusses the role of pharmacovigilance in monitoring adverse drug reactions (ADRs). It summarizes that pharmacovigilance aims to improve drug safety by identifying ADRs from reported cases and analyzing benefit-risk ratios of medications. Historical drug disasters like thalidomide and sulfanilamide poisonings demonstrated the importance of post-market drug safety monitoring. The document outlines the objectives, reporting process, and future of pharmacovigilance in India including expanding stakeholder reporting and standardizing methodology.
This document discusses pharmacovigilance, which refers to monitoring drugs for adverse effects after they reach the market. It defines pharmacovigilance and notes that the WHO recommends every country establish a pharmacovigilance center to share adverse drug reaction data globally. Clinical trials involve fewer patients over a short time, whereas drugs are used by many more people long-term in clinical practice. Reporting adverse drug reactions helps prevent future harm and improve drug safety. Causality assessment methods like the Naranjo algorithm determine the likelihood a drug caused a reaction in a patient. India has established a national pharmacovigilance program to monitor adverse reactions and ensure drug safety.
Pharmacovigilance a general overview most updatedpeter donik
The document provides an overview of the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) and adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting. It defines key pharmacovigilance terminology and introduces PvPI, which aims to improve patient safety through ADR monitoring. PvPI has established 220 ADR Monitoring Centers to collect reports from healthcare professionals and consumers via forms or a mobile app. Reported ADRs are assessed for causality and signals to support regulatory decision making. The goal is rational medicine use and reducing health risks.
The Four Cornerstones of the Conscious Corporation - PresentationEuro RSCG Worldwide
This document discusses the rise of corporate power over the past 200+ years and increasing distrust in corporations due to scandals. However, consumers now expect more from corporations in terms of social responsibility. The document proposes four cornerstones of the "conscious corporation" of the future: 1) a purpose beyond profit, 2) a people-centered culture, 3) championing sustainability, and 4) respecting consumers' power. Examples of companies embracing these principles are provided. The rewards of cultivating a strong reputation through these means are discussed.
50 Years of the EU Commission's Extended ServiceDr Lendy Spires
The role of the delegations has changed constantly … they now carry out tasks relating to almost all the areas where the European Union has a part to play. This reflects the Union’s growing importance as a world global player.
President Prodi, September 2003 The European Union in the world The European Union is a unique experience of peaceful integration and cooperation between former rivals and competitors. Its process of unity was central to the economic and political history of Europe in the second half of the last century.
Its achievements today are impressive, and impossible to imagine only a few years ago: peace and stability have been consolidated; growth has been fostered; the well-being of EU citizens has substantially increased. The single currency is a historic success, and Community policies guarantee the safeguard of European principles and interests.
The EU is today, even before completion of the enlargement process, the world’s largest economic and trading partner, the largest donor of development assistance and the largest provider of humanitarian aid. It is also playing a crucial part in projecting stability around its periphery, notably through the process of further enlargement with central European and Mediterranean countries. In the external relations area, the EU is now moving forward to a European foreign policy that is properly linked to the EU institutions which manage the instruments needed for its accomplishment.
The European Commission plays a key role in the implementation of the EU’s foreign and other policies and in this it relies heavily 5 Taking Europe to the world — 50 years of the European Commission’s External Service
The document is a programme for the 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion in Helsinki, Finland from June 10-14, 2013. The programme provides details on the opening ceremonies, six plenary sessions, and numerous parallel sessions covering topics like the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP), health impact assessments, agricultural policy and nutrition, and integrating health in foreign and trade policy. The document introduces the conference themes and goals of reviewing progress in health promotion and closing the implementation gap through intersectoral action at various governance levels.
Horizon 2020 & EC Innovation policy and Smart Cities EIPby Director Mario Campolargo, European Commission, Directorate F: Emerging Technologies and Infrastructures. DG INFSO. Smart Cities & the Future Internet organised by Fireball, Eurocities and ENoLL on January 25th, 2012.
Complet Es Barroso Europe 2020 Es VersionAutoocupació
1) La estrategia propone tres prioridades para Europa 2020: crecimiento inteligente, sostenible e integrador.
2) Se establecen cinco objetivos principales cuantificables para la UE en 2020 relacionados con el empleo, la I+D, el cambio climático, la educación y la pobreza.
3) Se proponen siete iniciativas emblemáticas para catalizar los avances en cada prioridad, como la Unión por la Innovación y una Agenda Digital para Europa.
Health 2020 is a new European policy framework for health and well-being adopted by the WHO Regional Committee for Europe in 2012. It aims to significantly improve population health and well-being, reduce health inequities, and ensure sustainable health systems. Health 2020 recognizes that health challenges require involvement across all levels of government and society. It provides an adaptable framework for integrated interventions to address major health issues like noncommunicable and communicable diseases.
Presentation Structural Funds for marine research infrastructure jpioceans
The document discusses proposals from the European Commission regarding EU Cohesion Policy for 2014-2020. It proposes allocating over €336 billion to Cohesion Policy over this period. Funding would focus on reducing economic disparities between EU regions and supporting the Europe 2020 goals of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Regions would be divided into three categories based on GDP to determine funding eligibility. Structural funds could finance up to 25% of funding for research, innovation, job creation and other priorities. Marine research infrastructures are discussed as one type of project that may be supported.
This document is the roll of successful examinees for the November 29 & 30, 2009 Nurse Licensure Examination released on January 30, 2010. It lists 214 names in sequential number order along with their names. The document provides the basic information of successful examinees for this particular nurse board exam.
The document discusses potential opportunities for the Windsor & Hantsport Railway in Nova Scotia, Canada. It outlines several stops along the railway line including Greenwich with parking near sports fields and mudflats for ecotourism, Grand-Pre which is a UNESCO World Heritage Site celebrating Acadian heritage, and Hantsport. It also mentions assets like scenic views of the Avon River and potential liabilities like a tidal bridge.
The document provides a personal account of encounters with the Mamanua indigenous group in the Philippines. It describes how the narrator's perceptions changed from seeing the Mamanua as "kongking" creatures to understanding their struggles and rich culture. Logging and mining displaced the Mamanua from their ancestral lands, forcing many into poverty and crime in cities. The narrator found their calling in nursing after helping a wounded Mamanua man in the hospital.
The document is a stock report from L.A. Micro Group listing the quantity on hand of various Dell networking and storage adapter cards. It includes over 50 items with over 500 cards total in stock. The cards include host bus adapters, network interface cards, remote management cards, and other peripheral cards for Dell servers and blades.
This document analyzes the implementation of an e-procurement system by the Electronic Procurement Service Unit (LPSE) in Kepulauan Riau Province, Indonesia. It finds that the implementation was effective, with a score of 3.27 out of 5, due to factors like clear objectives, regulations, and adequate resources. However, political processes had a strong influence on the system, accounting for 97.4% of impacts. The researchers conclude that strong political will is needed to effectively implement e-procurement and reduce corruption in public procurement.
This document is a quiz containing 10 questions about aviation terminology including general aviation, avionics, nautical miles, knots, load factor, deregulation, freedom rights, cabotage, cost per available seat mile (CASM), and the derivation of kilometers. The quiz tests the reader's knowledge of basic aviation concepts and industry terms.
Building a Global Center of Excellence | Antonio Espinoza – Director of Digit...Conductor
Developing a winning SEO program and daily management process is tough. Developing this for a $20B corporation, with over 300 legal entities, while operating in all parts of the globe is a true challenge. Over the past few years Danaher has partnered with Conductor to build a winning Digital Marketing Center of Excellence for our top Operating Companies. View this presentation by Antonio Espinoza, the Director of Digital Marketing at Danaher, to learn the steps they took and the knowledge they gained in the process.
This document summarizes a research paper that investigates the effect of process parameters on TIG welding of aluminum alloy 65032. The researchers used Response Surface Methodology to determine the optimal welding speed, current, and gas flow rate to maximize tensile strength and elongation. Central composite design was used to conduct experiments. Mathematical models were developed from the results to study the effect of parameters on strength and elongation. Optimization was performed to find the optimum welding conditions. Confirmation tests validated the optimum parameter settings.
This document is a record of discussions by an eTutoring team revising their hypothesis for an online tutoring marketplace project. It shows the hypothesis being iteratively modified based on comments from team members Nancy, WM, NP, and NQ over several dates. The revisions mainly focus on refining who the key users (tutors and knowledge seekers) are and what value the online portal would provide by enabling more efficient and flexible knowledge exchange on a global scale.
Dry cleaning involves cleaning fabrics with nonaqueous solvents using three steps: washing, spinning to extract solvent, and drying. Two main types of cleaning fluids are used: petroleum solvents and synthetic solvents like perchloroethylene. There are also two types of machines: transfer machines that separate washing and drying, and dry-to-dry machines that integrate all steps. The dry cleaning industry consists of coin-operated facilities, commercial shops, and industrial cleaners. Emissions occur from various sources in the dry cleaning process. Controls include solvent recovery systems using condensers and carbon adsorption to minimize emissions.
The document discusses design of experiments (DOE) and Taguchi methods. It explains key concepts in Taguchi's approach such as quality robustness, quality loss function, and target specifications. Taguchi techniques use experimental design methods to identify important variables affecting a product or process and optimize the design. The document provides examples of full and fractional factorial experiments to study the effects of multiple factors and interactions. It emphasizes the importance of considering interactions between factors rather than just main effects.
The European Union has taken several actions to address rare diseases at the EU level. This includes establishing an Orphan Medicinal Product Regulation to incentivize research and development of treatments for rare diseases. The EU has also adopted the Second EU Health Programme for 2008-2013, which prioritizes rare diseases. More recently, the EU issued a Commission Communication and Council Recommendation on rare diseases calling on member states to develop national plans or strategies for rare diseases by 2013.
The document discusses European Union actions related to newborn screening for rare diseases. It provides background on EU health policy and legislation regarding rare diseases. It then summarizes an evaluation launched in 2009 on newborn screening practices for rare diseases across EU member states. The evaluation includes reports on current practices, an expert opinion on developing EU policies, and establishing an expert network on newborn screening.
The document discusses European Union action in the field of rare diseases, including establishing a legal basis, adopting programs and regulations, and outlining priorities and future actions. Key points include adopting an EU action program on rare diseases in 1999-2003, establishing an Orphan Medicinal Product Regulation in 2000, making rare diseases a priority in the Second EU Health Programme 2008-2013, and adopting a Commission Communication and Council Recommendation on rare diseases in 2008-2009 to guide member state plans and strategies.
The document summarizes the development of national initiatives and European policies for rare diseases over the past few decades. It outlines key events and documents that have recognized rare diseases as a public health priority in Europe requiring transnational cooperation. These include the establishment of national plans and centers of expertise in many European countries from the 1980s onward, as well as European regulations, recommendations, and programs to support research, care coordination, and patient organizations. However, it notes ongoing challenges around decentralization, resources, and sustainability that require continued supportive policies.
The document summarizes the development of national initiatives and European policies for rare diseases over the past few decades. It outlines key events and documents that have recognized rare diseases as a public health priority in Europe. These include the establishment of national plans and centers of expertise in many European countries between the 1980s-2000s, as well as European regulations, programs, and networks to support research, care, and access to orphan drugs. It discusses ongoing challenges and priorities for further developing strategies and cross-national collaboration to improve quality of life for those affected by rare diseases.
The document provides recommendations for developing national plans to address rare diseases in European countries. It discusses key priorities that should be covered in national plans, including research, centers of expertise, information and patient services, gathering expert opinions, and empowering patient organizations. It also outlines elements of methodology for developing, managing, and evaluating national plans, such as governance structures, plan content, indicators, and funding. The overall goal is to build an integrated and comprehensive strategy across Europe to address the needs of rare disease patients.
This document summarizes a proposal for a Directive on cross-border healthcare in the European Union. The proposal aims to 1) help patients access healthcare in other EU countries by establishing reimbursement rules, 2) ensure quality and safety standards for cross-border care, and 3) foster cooperation between healthcare systems. It discusses setting reimbursement rates, responsibilities of countries providing treatment, and establishing European Reference Networks to improve access to specialized care for rare diseases. The political process of adopting the Directive is outlined, including votes in the European Parliament and negotiations in the Council.
The document summarizes the key outcomes of 15 national conferences on developing national plans for rare diseases held in European countries. The conferences discussed recommendations for defining strategic plans, indicators for monitoring plans, and delivering suggestions. Key messages focused on the need for socioeconomic research, empowering patient associations in research, developing quality registries, strengthening centers of expertise, training healthcare professionals, and empowering patients in decision-making.
UCD Rare Disease Module 2017 - Dr Derick Mitchell - March 28th 2017ipposi
Medical students taking the elective course in rare diseases are provided a number of patient perspectives throughout the module. This is what IPPOSI presented in 2017.
Centers of expertise for rare diseases are important for improving patient access to diagnosis and care. They provide specialized multidisciplinary care and allow healthcare resources to be optimized. Evaluation of centers is important for quality. Centers of expertise are key to rare disease research and clinical trials by concentrating expertise. European reference networks of centers of expertise across countries provide added value and quality care for rare disease patients.
The document discusses European policies and national plans for rare diseases. It provides details on:
- The 1999 European regulation on orphan medicinal products and 2008 EU communication on rare diseases that set out a community strategy.
- The 2009 EU recommendation that member states develop national rare disease plans or strategies by 2013 addressing areas like care, research, and social services.
- Updates from EUROPLAN 2015 on the status of national rare disease plans in 24 European countries.
- Core indicators proposed by the EU to monitor national rare disease plans across areas like governance, care centers, research, and funding.
Norwegian Romanian (No Ro) Parternership For Progress InMihaiela Fazacas
The document summarizes a project between Norwegian and Romanian organizations to improve quality of life for those with rare diseases in Romania. The project aims to establish a Rare Disease Task Force to evaluate cases and propose actions. It also aims to create new services like a training network for rare disease specialists and accredited online courses. A pilot reference center is planned to provide personalized care for rare disease patients. The overall goal is to improve access to diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation for rare diseases in Romania.
How Effective is the Public in Influencing HTA Decisions?Kathi Apostolidis
Patients should be involved in HTA process to assure a robust process that embraces patients' needs, preferences, perspectives. ECPC-European Cancer Patient Coalition leverages on European Institutions for a solution to the timely authorization and reimbursement of innovative cancer medicines
The document discusses the need for improved EU-wide provision of reference microbiology laboratories for human pathogens. It summarizes a previous study called EURLOP that evaluated options for an EU reference laboratory system but did not include a cost-benefit analysis. The current study aims to provide a cost-benefit analysis of strengthening coordination of reference microbiology in the EU. It analyzes costs and benefits of existing reference laboratory networks and finds that benefits, both monetary and non-monetary, outweigh the costs. However, issues like sustainable funding and defining the scope of networks would need addressed for a future EU reference laboratory system.
Poison information center (Structural Organization and functions)Dr. Abhimanyu Prashar
The document discusses the functions and roles of poison information centers (PICs). It outlines that PICs provide toxicological information and advice, manage poisoning cases, provide laboratory services, conduct education and training, and engage in toxicovigilance activities like identifying risks and preventing poisoning. PICs also contribute to areas like drug information, substances of abuse, environmental toxicology, and disaster planning. Effective PICs require cooperation with various medical and government organizations.
Workshop 2 - Centres of expertise & Networks of experts
"Presentation of the concept, definitions and
terminology"
Samantha Parker, E-IMD, OrphanEurope
The document summarizes developments in animal welfare (AW) policies in the European Union over the past 40 years. It outlines key milestones like the inclusion of AW in the EU Treaty in 1999 and the establishment of the first Community Action Plan in 2006. The Action Plan aimed to upgrade standards, promote research, introduce AW indicators, and increase public involvement. In 2010, the European Parliament supported the achievements but called for a new EU Strategy to further integrate and enforce AW policies through a framework law, reference centers, and equivalent import standards. The new Strategy recognizes consumers' influence and aims to simplify regulation through outcome-based indicators, transparency, and competence requirements.
Similar to Montsserat Rtd Presentation Cluj 2009 (20)
El documento parece estar escrito en un idioma que no reconozco. No puedo generar un resumen útil de solo 3 oraciones debido a que no entiendo el contenido o significado del texto original.
Umbra is a stealth technology company that develops augmented reality systems to help soldiers and first responders. Their flagship product is the Umbra Tactical Augmented Reality System (UTARS) which projects holograms onto a soldier's visor to provide situational awareness and mission critical data without revealing their position or exposing them to danger. UTARS aims to enhance situational awareness and decision making while keeping users safe in hazardous environments.
The document discusses summarizing information concisely in a single word. Providing concise yet informative summaries allows for efficiently conveying key details and concepts from a document in as few words as possible. Summarizing skills are useful for effectively communicating complex ideas or large amounts of information in a clear and straightforward manner.
This document lists various domestic animals including dogs, sheep, pigs, goats, cows, cats, chickens, roosters, ducks, geese, turkeys, rabbits, water buffalo, and other farm animals.
The document discusses the sensory systems and processing, providing information on the different sensory systems (tactile, vestibular, proprioception, auditory, visual, olfactory, and gustatory), how they function, possible problems with sensory processing, and strategies to address behaviors related to sensory needs.
The document discusses the sensory systems and how they work together to give us information about the world. It describes the main sensory systems - tactile, vestibular, proprioception, auditory, visual, olfactory, and gustatory. It explains how sensory processing occurs and potential problems with sensory processing. The roles of different neurotransmitters are outlined. Sensory behaviors and strategies to address them are provided, along with calming and alerting activities.
The document outlines the daily routine and schedule for a classroom. It includes purposes and descriptions for different parts of the day like entrance routine, sensory activities, reviewing the schedule, morning dialogue, independent work, calendar/circle time, rotations between activities, you choose time, peer buddies, academics/small groups, relaxation, art/music/gym, and reviewing the day's activities. The schedule is designed to promote independence, reduce anxiety, and provide a variety of learning experiences including sensory, social, and academic activities.
Introduction To Structured Teaching For TranslationMihaiela Fazacas
The document provides an introduction to structured teaching for students with autism. Structured teaching is based on the Heartland Model and incorporates elements from TEACCH. Its primary goal is to develop independence and communication skills through visual structure, schedules, and work systems. These tools make the environment more predictable and help students understand expectations and complete tasks independently.
1. Health surveillance and Rare diseases action:
Europe’s challenges
Cluj-Napoca, 26th June 2009
Antoni Montserrat Moliner
European Commission
DG SANCO Health Information Unit
1
2. Legal basis for the developments of the EU Public Health Policy
• Based on Article 152 of the EU Treaty
•A Community action programme on RD, including genetic diseases, was adopted for
the period of 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2003 with the aim of ensuring a high
level of health protection in relation to RD. As the first EU effort in this area, specific
attention was given to improving knowledge and facilitating access to information
about these diseases.
• For the period 2008-2013 the Commission has adopted the White Paper COM(2007)
630 final “Together for Health: A Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013” of 23
October 2007 developing the EU Health Strategy. Actions under Objective 1 of this EU
Strategy cover a Communication on European Action in the Field of Rare Diseases and
in point 4.1 of this EU Strategy it is suggested to put forward EC-level structured
cooperation mechanisms to advise the Commission and to promote cooperation
between the Member States.
• As a consequence Rare diseases are now one of the priorities in the
EU Health Programme 2008-2013. According to the DG SANCO Work Plans for the
implementation of the Public Health Programme, the two main lines of action are the
exchange of information via existing European information networks on rare diseases,
and the development of strategies and mechanisms for information exchange and co-
ordination at EU level to encourage continuity of work and trans-national co-operation.
2
3. Legal basis for the developments of the EU Public Health Policy
• Orphan Medicinal Product Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products, was
proposed to set up the criteria for orphan designation in the EU and describes the
incentives (e.g. 10-year market exclusivity, protocol assistance, access to the
Centralised Procedure for Marketing Authorisation) to encourage the research,
development and marketing of medicines to treat, prevent or diagnose rare diseases.
• In the current Framework Programme, the FP7, the Health Theme of the
"Cooperation" Specific Programme, is designed to support multinational collaborative
research in different forms. The main focus of the Health theme in the rare diseases
area are Europe-wide studies of natural history, pathophysiology, and the
development of preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.
• Commission Communication COM (2008) 679/2 to the European Parliament, the
Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Rare
diseases: Europe’s challenges creating an integrated approach for the EU action in the
field of rare diseases. Adopted 11th November 2008.
• Council Recommendation on a European action in the field of rare diseases
recommending actions at national level to implement the EU action (e.g. National
Plans for Rare Diseases). Adopted 9th June 2009.
3
4. Future legal basis for the developments of the EU Public Health Policy
• Decision of the Commission creating a European Union Committee of Experts on Rare
Diseases during 2009. To be composed by 54 members representing Member States,
patient’s organisations, industry, FP Projects, Health Programme projects, etc. To be
adopted before the End 2009.
• Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of
patients' rights in cross-border healthcare (COM(2008)414) provides for the
development of European reference networks (ERNs) to be facilitated by the Member
States. The ERN for Rare Diseases will have a strategic role in the improvement of
quality treatment for all patients throughout the European Union as called by the
patients' organisations. To be adopted.
4
5. The Commission Communication and the Council Recommendation on
rare diseases
• There is probably no other area in public health in which 27
national approaches could be considered to be so inefficient and
ineffective as with rare diseases. The reduced number of patients
for these diseases and the need to mobilise resources could be
only efficient if done in a coordinated European way.
• Article 152 provides for the adoption by qualified majority by the
Council of Recommendations, on the basis of Commission
proposals, for the purposes set out in that article.
• These Recommendations are the only legislative tool provided for
in Article 152 on public health except for the few areas where
measures or incentive measures may be adopted (see Article
152.4).
5
6. The Commission Communication and the Council Recommendation on
rare diseases
• Recommendations are without legal force but are negotiated and voted on
according to the appropriate procedure. Recommedations differ from
regulations, directives and decisions, in that they are not binding for
Member States. Though without legal force, they do have a political
weight.
• The Recommendation is an instrument of indirect action aiming at
preparation of legislation in Member States, differing from the Directive
only by the absence of obligatory power.
• In order to coordinate the position of the Member States in respect of this
important field, it is considered that a Recommendation is the appropriate
legal instrument.
• In the case of the proposed Communication on rare diseases, it is
considered necessary to accompany that Communication with a Proposal
for a Council Recommendation on rare diseases.
6
7. Still now priority was given to EU Projects creating networks of action for rare
diseases
• A priority for action was to guarantee the exchange of
information via existing European information networks on rare
diseases,
• Registries and databases constitute a strong priority to
guarantee patient's information of quality and a solid information
basis permitting an efficient monitoring, research and knowledge
management of all rare diseases.
• To develop strategies and mechanisms for exchanging
information between people affected by a rare disease,
volunteers and professionals,
• To define relevant health indicators
• To develop comparable epidemiological data at EU level,
• To support an exchange of best practise and develop measures
for patient groups.
7
8. EU Projects creating networks of action for rare diseases
• A solid benchmarking could be established with successful EU
Public Health Programme ongoing projects, having World
relevance in the area [ORPHANET, EUROCAT (Surveillance of
congenital anomalies in Europe), ENERCA (European Network for
Rare Congenital Anaemias, or EAIS (European Autism
Information System)] with
• EU FP6 ongoing projects [EUROWILSON, RBDD (Rare Bleeding
Disorders Database) or EUROSCA for ataxias].
• These project outputs should also supports specific international
consensus conferences such as the Consensus Conference on
Primary Immunodeficiency in 2006 or the European Haemophilia
Consortium Conferences.
• The European Conference on Rare Diseases (next 13-15 May
2010, Krakow (Poland).
8
9. Still now priority was given to Pilot reference networks (centres of reference)
for rare diseases
The suggested criteria to be fulfilled by the European reference
networks are:
• Sufficient activity and capacity to provide relevant services and maintain
quality of the services provided
• Capacity to provide expert advice, diagnosis or confirmation of diagnosis,
to produce and adhere to good practice guidelines and to implement
outcome measures and quality control
• Demonstration of a multi-disciplinary approach;
• High level of expertise and experience documented through publications,
grants or honorific positions, teaching and training activities
• Strong contribution to research
• Involvement in epidemiological surveillance, such as registries
• Close links and collaboration with other expert centres at national and
international level and capacity to network
• Close links and collaboration with patients associations where they exist.
• Appropriate arrangements for referrals of patients from other Member
States established within a framework.
• Appropriate capacities to diagnose, to follow-up and manage patients 9
with evidence of good outcomes so far as applicable.
10. Still now priority was given to Pilot reference networks (centres of reference)
for rare diseases
The Work Plan 2006 for the implementation of the EU public health programme, introduces as
a priority in the area of rare diseases: to develop European Networks of Centres of
Reference for Rare Diseases. According to this priority some Projects have been
selected for funding:
• European Centres of Reference Network for Cystic Fibrosis with the Klinikum der
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität (DE) as Project Leader,
• European Network of Centres of Reference for Dysmorphology with The University of
Manchester (UK) as Project Leader,
• Patient Associations and Alpha1 International Registry with the Stichting Alpha1
International Registry (NL) as Project Leader,
• European Porphyria Network: providing better healthcare for patients and their
families with the Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (FR) as Project Leader,
• Establishment of a European Network of Rare Bleeding Disorders, with the Università
degli Studi di Milano (IT) as Project Leader.
• European network of paediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma – European-wide organisation of
quality controlled treatment with the University of Leipzig (D) as Project Leader.
• European Network of Reference for Rare Paediatric Neurological Diseases (NEUROPED)
with the European Network for Research on Alternating Hemiplegia (AT) as Project
Leader.
• A reference network for Langerhans cell histiocytosis and associated syndrome in EU
with Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (FR) as Project Leader.
10
11. The European Commission Task Force on Rare Diseases
• The Task Force is assisted by a Scientific Secretariat which was
set up to contribute to the development of public health action in
the field of rare diseases
• The main objectives of the Task Force on Rare Diseases are to
identify morbidity and mortality indicators for rare diseases, set
up a common framework in the field of public health for rare
diseases, and to produce an electronic newsletter.
• To better emphasize the importance of and action in the field of
rare diseases, the European Commission set up an advisory
structure: the Task Force on Rare Diseases (RDTF).
• The RDTF publishes a monthly electronic newsletter on the EC's
Rare Diseases actions: ORPHANews Europe
• http://www.orpha.net/actor/EuropaNews/2006/060316.html
• 36 members representing EU Projects (Health Programme and
FP7) and Member States.
11
12. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Actions to improve information, identification and knowledge on rare diseases
• The EU definition of rare disease based on a prevalence of less than 5 per
10,000 is maintained
• An EU or an international project exploring an incidence based definition
of rare diseases will be launched
• The EU will contribute to the ongoing process of revision of the ICD
(International Classification of Diseases) in order to ensure appropriate
codification and classification of rare diseases in the future ICD-11. A
working group will be supported for all the period of this revision
• The EU will establish since 2010 a dynamic Inventory of Rare Diseases to
be periodically updated
• The database Orphanet will be supported using appropriate financial
instruments
• The support to the disease information networks through the Health
Programme and the FP7 should be pursued
12
13. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Action to support implementation of National Plans for Rare Diseases
• The Member States are invited to establish national or regional action
plans for RD before 2013 in order to implement the actions suggested in
the Commission Communication and the Council Recommendation and to
provide an annual report on the progress made toward this objective
• The Commission will provide European guidelines for the elaboration of
these action plans for RD (EUROPLAN Project selected for funding on
2007). Appropriate international conferences will be organised (18th
November 2008 in Paris and 18-19th June in Madrid)
13
14. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
•The WHO has launched the process of revision of the International
Classification of Diseases (ICD) -10 to prepare the new ICD-11 which
should be ready around 2015. The EC is very involved on the process
from the side of the Rare Diseases.
•Discussions on the revision and improvement of the ICD will be also
launched for the mental health disorders.
•The EU Task Force on Rare Diseases recognised as WHO Advisory
Group on Rare Diseases.
• 5 860 rare diseases listed in Orphanet but only 240 having a code in
the ICD-10
14
15. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
To improve prevention, diagnosis and care of patients with Rare Diseases
• Development of e-Health in the field of RD using on-line and electronic tools
• Creation of a help line unique EU-wide number for information and social services on
rare diseases (e.g. a 116 number)
• An evaluation of possible population neonatal screening strategy for Rare Diseases will
be launched
• To launch a European series Patient Leaflets on some rare diseases in all the EU
languages
• Provide support toward harmonization of quality testing and counselling for rare
genetic diseases through initiatives such as EuroGentest
15
16. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
• An evaluation of possible population screening (including neonatal screening)
strategies for Rare Diseases will be launched
Call for Tender to be launched in June 2009 concerning evaluation of population
newborn screening practices for rare disorders in Member States of the
European Union (18 months)
Deliverable 1: "Report on the practices of NBS for rare diseases
implemented in all the Member States including number of
centres, estimation of the number of infants screened and the
number of disorders included in the NBS as well as reasons for
the selection of these disorders". The study includes the
necessary tables which list all screening requirements and
outputs useful to adopt future decisions in a comparative basis.
Deliverable 2: "Expert opinion on the development of European
policies in the field of newborn screening for rare diseases". This
expert opinion will also discuss the existing barriers and propose
solutions to be implemented, if feasible, at the EU level.
Deliverable 3: "Set up of a European Union Network of experts on
Newborn Screening and organization of a Final European Experts 16
Consensus Workshop on Newborn Screening"
17. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Actions to ensure equal access to all EU patients to orphan drugs
• To explore additional incentives at national or European level to strengthen research
into rare diseases and development of orphan medicinal products, and Member State
familiarity with these products
• A European guideline should clarify responsibilities in a Compassionate Use situation
• The Commission should present, a report to the Council and the Parliament identifying
bottlenecks on orphan drugs access (delays, marketing, access, reimbursement,
prices, etc.) proposing the necessary legislative modifications in order to guarantee
equal access to orphan drugs throughout the EU on the basis of a COMP/EUACRD
European collaborative scientific assessment (Commission, EMEA)
• A method for the assessment of the Clinical Added Value of Orphan Drugs should
perform a common scientific assessment of the CAV for each Orphan Drug and deliver
an opinion document
17
18. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Actions to develop national/regional centres of expertise and establish EU
reference networks
• To repertory in an EU list the existing Centres of Expertise identified throughout the
Member States by the end of 2010;
• To establish a procedure for designation and accreditation methodology of EU
Reference Networks for Rare Diseases (according to the future Directive on Cross-
border health care);
• To provide adequate, long-term public funding to Centres of Expertise in order to
ensure their sustainability and continuity of care for patients;
• To provide adequate, long-term public funding to European Reference Networks
Centres of Expertise in order to ensure their sustainability and continuity of care for
patients;
• To recommend inclusion in the National Plan for Rare Diseases provisions on the
recognition and funding of Centres of expertise and their participation in European
Reference Networks;
• To recommend the adoption of national initiatives in the National Plans for Rare
Diseases on specialised social services;
• To provide financial support to networks of specialised social service;
18
19. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Actions to gather at European level the limited and scattered expertise on rare
diseases
• The Health Programme and the FP7 will continue to support, in a
coordinated way, registries, databases and biobanks on rare diseases with
appropriate financial tools for a sustainable funding when necessary
• The Commission will establish publicly accessible EU Register of Rare
Diseases patient registers databases and biobanks defining criteria for
register accreditation and qualification and the access to data or samples.
• Specific support to further research into biomarkers should also be given
to encourage long-term follow-up, and the acquisition of robust evidence
on clinical effectiveness
19
20. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
The Health Programme and the FP7 will continue to support, in a coordinated
way, registries, databases and biobanks on rare diseases with appropriate
financial tools for a sustainable funding when necessary
• Joint Action between the Commission and the Member States to be
launched in June 2010 concerning the support to the ORPHANET database
(36 months)
• Joint Action between the Commission and the Member States to be
launched in June 2010 concerning the support to the EUROCAT Project
(36 months)
20
21. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Actions to accelerate research and developments in the field of Rare Diseases
and Orphan Drugs
• The EU Committee of Experts on RD and the Committee for Orphan
Medicinal Products (COMP) in the EMEA (European Medicines Agency) will
address to the FP7 recommendations on research priorities on RD
• To launch the creation of a public-private foundation for RD, the European
Research Foundation for Rare Diseases
21
22. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Actions to empower patients with Rare Diseases at individual and collective
level
• The Health Programme will continue to integrate the support to
the patient’s organisations as a priority for action
22
23. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Actions to develop the international cooperation on rare diseases
• An international cooperation framework on rare diseases with
other countries (e.g. US, Canada, Japan, Singapore, Australia,…)
will be adopted (Commission)
• A proposal of resolution on an international action in the field of
rare diseases will be submitted by the European Commission to
the World Health Assembly (Commission)
23
24. New priorities after Commission Communication and Council Recommendation
Actions to coordinate the policies and initiatives at EU level
• An EU Committee of Experts on Rare Disease (EUECRD) will be created, by Commission
Decision, in order to advice the European Commission. Members should be nominated
by the national authorities. Experts leading Health Programme and FP initiatives
should also be members. Observers from the patient’s organisations and from the
industry will also be proposed.
• The European Conferences on Rare Diseases will be organised every two or three
years. Funds will be provided by the Health Programme (Commission).
• Every four years the Commission should produce an Implementation report on the
Commission Communication and Council Recommendation addressed to the Council,
the Parliament, the Social and Economic Committee and the Committee of the Regions
(Commission)
24
25. EU historical support to RD research
Previous programmes:
Promote cooperation, collaboration and knowledge building
FP5: Total 47 RD projects, € 64 million
25
ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/lifescihealth/docs/reprint_rec48300_rare_dis_060207.pdf
26. FP7: What’s new?
New
FP7
Duration increased to seven years
Annual average budget increase
Main elements: € 4.47 (FP6) to € 7.22 billion (FP7)
Frontier research (~ € 1.1 billion per year)
New structure:
Cooperation – Ideas – People – Capacities
Joint Technology Initiatives
⇒ Arising from European Technology Platforms
in fields of major European interest
⇒ “Strategic Research Agenda” defined
by stakeholders
⇒ Innovative Medicines Initiative
Outsourcing
27. Towards FP7: April 2005 workshop
Aim:
identify the future needs of the
rare diseases scientific community
in particular with respect to:
• types of projects (collaborative research
projects, coordination/networking, new
facilities, etc.)
• size of projects (limited and/or extended)
• potential priorities in fields to be covered
(animal models, methods for clinical trials,
specific condition/group of diseases, etc.)
• specific topics? 27
28. Towards FP7: April 2005 workshop
Results: recommendations to the EC
Types and size of projects
• collaborative research projects
• coordination/networking
• emerging teams
Priorities: open priorities:
• infrastructures: identification of genes and haplotyping, protein
pathways, animal models, data management, biobanks
• natural history of diseases (throughout Europe)
• mendelian phenotypes of common diseases (including modifier genes)
• physiopathology and mechanism of (groups of) diseases (including
disease course and modifier genes)
• pre-clinical and early clinical studies (including phase 1 and phase 2
clinical trials)
• therapeutic interventions: gene therapies, cell therapies,
drugs, devices
• social sciences (social perception/daily experience/impact of early
28
diagnosis/genetic counselling)
29. DG SANCO priorities on rare diseases
Web site
http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/non_com/rare_diseases_en.htm
29