Heart Failure Final common pathway for many cardiovascular diseases whose natural history results in symptomatic or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction Cardinal manifestations of heart failure include dyspnea, fatigue and fluid retention Risk of death is 5-10% annually in patients with mild symptoms and increases to as high as 30-40% annually in patients with advanced disease
Main causes Coronary artery disease Hypertension Valvular heart disease Cardiomyopathy Cor pulmonale
Compensatory changes in heart failure Activation of SNS Activation of RAS Increased heart rate Release of ADH Release of atrial natriuretic peptide Chamber enlargement Myocardial hypertrophy
NYHA Classification of heart failure Class I: No limitation of physical activity Class II: Slight limitation of physical activity Class III: Marked limitation of physical activity Class IV: Unable to carry out physical activity without discomfort
New classification of heart failure Stage A: Asymptomatic with no heart damage but have risk factors for heart failure Stage B: Asymptomatic but have signs of structural heart damage Stage C: Have symptoms and heart damage Stage D: Endstage disease ACC/AHA guidelines, 2001
Types of heart failure Diastolic dysfunction or diastolic heart failure Systolic dysfunction or systolic heart failure
Factors aggravating heart failure Myocardial ischemia or infarct Dietary sodium excess Excess fluid intake Medication noncompliance Arrhythmias Intercurrent illness (eg infection) Conditions associated with increased metabolic demand (eg pregnancy, thyrotoxicosis, excessive physical activity) Administration of drug with negative inotropic properties or fluid retaining properties (e. NSAIDs, corticosteroids) Alcohol
Goals of treatment  To improve symptoms and quality of life To decrease likelihood of disease progression To reduce the risk of death and need for hospitalisation
Approach to the Patient with Heart Failure Assessment of LV function (echocardiogram, radionuclide ventriculogram) EF < 40% Assessment of volume status Signs and symptoms of fluid retention No signs and symptoms of fluid retention Diuretic (titrate to euvolemic state) ACE Inhibitor  -blocker Digoxin
 
Effects of SNS Activation in Heart Failure Dysfunction/death of cardiac myocytes Provokes myocardial ischemia Provokes arrhythmias Impairs cardiac performance These effects are mediated via stimulation of    and   1  receptors Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 23S-37S
 
Carvedilol in Heart Failure Effective receptor-blockade approach to heart failure Negative inotropic effect counteracted by vasodilation Provides anti-proliferative, anti-arrhythmic activity and inhibition of apoptosis Prevents renin secretion Drugs of Today 1998; 34 (Suppl B): 1-23.
US Multicenter Program Placebo Carvedilol % Risk (n=398) (n=696) Reduction All-cause 31 22 65% mortality (7.8%) (3.2%) Death due to progressive 13 5 heart failure  (3.3%) (0.7%) Sudden death 15 12 (3.8%) (1.7%) Risk of hospitalization for 78 78 27% cardiovascular reasons (19.6%) (14.1%) Combined risk of 98 110 38% mortality & hospitalization (25%) (16%) NEJM 1996; 334:1349-1355
ANZ Multicentre Heart Failure Trial Placebo Carvedilol % Risk (n=208) (n=207) Reduction All-cause 26 20 24% mortality (12.5%) (10%) Risk of hospitalization for 84 64 28% cardiovascular reasons (40%) (31%) Combined risk of 97 74 29% mortality & hospitalization (47%) (36%) Lancet 1997; 349: 375-380.
Effect of carvedilol on progression of congestive heart failure   All randomized patients Endpoint Placebo Carvedilol  (n=134) (n=232) Primary endpoint 28 (21%) 25 (11%)* Death due to CHF 4 (3%) 0 (0%) Hospitalization due to worsening CHF 8 (6%) 9 (4%) Increase in CHF medication 16 (12%) 16 (7%) * Placebo vs. carvedilol, p = 0.008 Drugs of Today 1998; 34 (Suppl B): 1-23.
COPERNICUS: Effect on Mortality 35% Mortality (%) 22nd Congress of European Society of Cardiology, August 2000
COPERNICUS: Mortality reduction in special patient groups with carvedilol Mortality reduction (%) 22nd Congress of European Society of Cardiology, August 2000 EF<20%, hospitalised for heart failure in year prior to study entry EF  <  15%, hospitalised 3 or more times during prior year for worsening heart failure
Carvedilol vs. Metoprolol Change in LVEF (%) from baseline Circulation 2000; 102: 546-551
Dosage guidelines for Carvedilol in heart failure Patient selection Stable on background medications (diuretics, digoxin and/or ACE inhibitors) Not in a fluid-overload state Not hypotensive Before dose increase Evaluate for Worsening heart failure Vasodilation Bradycardia After each new dose initiation Observe for signs of dizziness or light headedness for one hour 3.125 mg bid 2 weeks Doubled every 2 weeks Max dose 25 mg bid (<85 kg); 50 mg bid (>85 kg)
Management of Complications Transient worsening of heart failure (e.g. increasing dyspnea, decreasing exercise capacity) Increase dose of diuretic and/or ACE inhibitor If necessary, reduce carvedilol dose and/or prolong titration interval Search for other possible causes (e.g. thyroid malfunction, infection, non-compliant drug intake, excessive liquid intake, etc.) Vasodilatory Symptoms (dizziness, light headedness, symptomatic hypotension) Decrease diuretic dose and, if necessary, ACE inhibitor dose If the cessation of both is not successful, reduce carvedilol dose and/or prolong titration interval
Management of Complications  (Contd.) Bradycardia (Pulse rate below 55 beats/min) Check and eventually reduce digitalis dose If necessary, reduce carvedilol dose and/or prolong titration interval Withdraw carvedilol only in the event that hemodynamics are affected Symptoms of Bronchial obstruction Search for other possible causes (e.g., concurrent infection, subacute pulmonary edema) Reduce dose of, or withdraw, carvedilol only after possible causes for symptoms have been ruled out
The role of angiotensin II in the progression of heart failure Coronary artery disease Cardiac overload Cardiomyopathy Left ventricular dysfunction  Arterial blood pressure  Angiotensin II  Peripheral organ blood flow  Skeletal muscle blood flow Exercise intolerance  Renal blood flow Oedema Cardiac remodelling Renin release Aldosterone release Vasoconstriction Na+ and water retention Inotropy and hypertrophy of vascular and cardiac cells Left ventricular dilation & hypertrophy Pump failure
ACE Inhibitors: physiologic benefits   Arteriovenous Vasodilatation    pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure    pulmonary capillary wedge pressure    left ventricular end-diastolic pressure    systemic vascular resistance    systemic blood pressure     maximal oxygen uptake (MVO 2 )
ACE Inhibitors:  physiologic benefits      LV function and cardiac output    renal, coronary, cerebral blood flow No change in heart rate or myocardial contractility no neurohormonal activation resultant diuresis and natriuresis
ACE Inhibitors:  clinical benefits   Increases exercise capacity improves functional class attenuation of LV remodeling post MI decrease in the progression of chronic HF decreased hospitalization enhanced quality of life improved survival
Asymptomatic Patients Enalapril  SOLVD Prevention Trial   EF<35%   HF progression,    hospitalization Captopril SAVE, GISSI-3, ISIS-4   Post MI, EF <40%   overall mortality,    re-infarction   hospitalization,    HF progression
Symptomatic Patients Hydralazine + Isosorbide dinitrate VHeFT-I   mortality, improved functional class as compared with use of digoxin and diuretics VHeFT-II proved less effective than enalapril
Dosage of ACE inhibitors: ATLAS study Low-dose High-dose (2.5-5 mg)  (32.5-35mg) Cardiovascular    44.9%     42.5% mortality All-cause mortality + hospitalisation for   83.8%  79.7%  cardiovascular reason All-cause mortality + hospitalisation for   60.4%  55.1% heart failure Circulation 1999;100:2312-18
AIRE AIRE Study demonstrated efficacy of  ramipril  on mortality and morbidity in CHF post-MI NYHA class I-III patients 2006 patients enrolled in a double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled study 27% reduction in the risk of death 23% decrease in progression to severe / resistant heart failure Lancet. 1993; 342:821-828
Guidelines to ACE Inhibitor Therapy Contraindications Renal artery stenosis Renal insufficiency (relative) Hyperkalemia Arterial hypotension Cough Angioedema Alternatives Hydralazine + ISDN, AT-II inhibitor
Guidelines to ACE Inhibitor Therapy All patients with symptomatic heart failure and those in functional class I with significantly reduced left ventricular function should be treated with an ACE inhibitor, unless contraindicated or not tolerated ACE inhibitors should be continued indefinitely It is important to titrate to the dosage regimen used in the clinical trials … in the absence of symptoms or adverse effects on end-organ perfusion In very severe heart failure, hydralazine and nitrates added to ACE inhibitor therapy can further improve cardiac output
ACE Inhibitor Therapy in Heart Failure Patients (Ejection Fraction  <  0.40) Systolic Blood Pressure <100 mmHg (or elevated creatinine) 100-139 mmHg (or recent intense diuresis) > 140 mmHg Lowest Dose, Short-Acting Usual Starting Dose, Long-or Short-Acting Intermediate Dose, Long- or Short-Acting Follow-Up Every 1-2 Weeks Stable BP and Creatinine Level Symptomatic Low BP or Rising Creatinine Level Residual Excess Fluid? Stop Diuretic and ACE Inhibitor Therapy Return to Baseline BP and Creatinine Level ? Increase ACE Inhibitor Dose; Follow-Up Every 1-2 Weeks Target Dose Resume ACE Inhibitor Titration Refer to specialist Stop ACE Inhibitor Therapy Y N Y N
Diuretics Indicated in patients with symptoms of heart failure who have evidence of fluid retention Enhance response to other drugs in heart failure such as beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors Therapy initiated with low doses followed by increments in dosage until urine output increases and weight decreases by 0.5-1kg daily
Digoxin Enhances LV function, normalizes baroreceptor-mediated reflexes and increases cardiac output at rest and during exercise Recommended to improve clinical status of patients with heart failure due to LV dysfunction and should be used in conjunction with diuretics, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers Also recommended in patients with heart failure who have  atrial fibrillation Digoxin initiated and maintained at a dose of 0.25 mg daily Adverse effects include cardiac arrhythmias, GI symptoms and neurological complaints (eg. visual disturbances, confusion)
Summary of drug treatment for CHF Asymptomatic Mild to moderate Moderate LV dysfunction CHF to severe CHF ACE inhibitor Digoxin Digoxin Beta blocker Diuretics Diuretics ACE inhibitor ACE inhibitor Beta blocker Beta blocker Spironolactone

Management Of Chf

  • 1.
    Heart Failure Finalcommon pathway for many cardiovascular diseases whose natural history results in symptomatic or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction Cardinal manifestations of heart failure include dyspnea, fatigue and fluid retention Risk of death is 5-10% annually in patients with mild symptoms and increases to as high as 30-40% annually in patients with advanced disease
  • 2.
    Main causes Coronaryartery disease Hypertension Valvular heart disease Cardiomyopathy Cor pulmonale
  • 3.
    Compensatory changes inheart failure Activation of SNS Activation of RAS Increased heart rate Release of ADH Release of atrial natriuretic peptide Chamber enlargement Myocardial hypertrophy
  • 4.
    NYHA Classification ofheart failure Class I: No limitation of physical activity Class II: Slight limitation of physical activity Class III: Marked limitation of physical activity Class IV: Unable to carry out physical activity without discomfort
  • 5.
    New classification ofheart failure Stage A: Asymptomatic with no heart damage but have risk factors for heart failure Stage B: Asymptomatic but have signs of structural heart damage Stage C: Have symptoms and heart damage Stage D: Endstage disease ACC/AHA guidelines, 2001
  • 6.
    Types of heartfailure Diastolic dysfunction or diastolic heart failure Systolic dysfunction or systolic heart failure
  • 7.
    Factors aggravating heartfailure Myocardial ischemia or infarct Dietary sodium excess Excess fluid intake Medication noncompliance Arrhythmias Intercurrent illness (eg infection) Conditions associated with increased metabolic demand (eg pregnancy, thyrotoxicosis, excessive physical activity) Administration of drug with negative inotropic properties or fluid retaining properties (e. NSAIDs, corticosteroids) Alcohol
  • 8.
    Goals of treatment To improve symptoms and quality of life To decrease likelihood of disease progression To reduce the risk of death and need for hospitalisation
  • 9.
    Approach to thePatient with Heart Failure Assessment of LV function (echocardiogram, radionuclide ventriculogram) EF < 40% Assessment of volume status Signs and symptoms of fluid retention No signs and symptoms of fluid retention Diuretic (titrate to euvolemic state) ACE Inhibitor  -blocker Digoxin
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Effects of SNSActivation in Heart Failure Dysfunction/death of cardiac myocytes Provokes myocardial ischemia Provokes arrhythmias Impairs cardiac performance These effects are mediated via stimulation of  and  1 receptors Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 23S-37S
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Carvedilol in HeartFailure Effective receptor-blockade approach to heart failure Negative inotropic effect counteracted by vasodilation Provides anti-proliferative, anti-arrhythmic activity and inhibition of apoptosis Prevents renin secretion Drugs of Today 1998; 34 (Suppl B): 1-23.
  • 14.
    US Multicenter ProgramPlacebo Carvedilol % Risk (n=398) (n=696) Reduction All-cause 31 22 65% mortality (7.8%) (3.2%) Death due to progressive 13 5 heart failure (3.3%) (0.7%) Sudden death 15 12 (3.8%) (1.7%) Risk of hospitalization for 78 78 27% cardiovascular reasons (19.6%) (14.1%) Combined risk of 98 110 38% mortality & hospitalization (25%) (16%) NEJM 1996; 334:1349-1355
  • 15.
    ANZ Multicentre HeartFailure Trial Placebo Carvedilol % Risk (n=208) (n=207) Reduction All-cause 26 20 24% mortality (12.5%) (10%) Risk of hospitalization for 84 64 28% cardiovascular reasons (40%) (31%) Combined risk of 97 74 29% mortality & hospitalization (47%) (36%) Lancet 1997; 349: 375-380.
  • 16.
    Effect of carvedilolon progression of congestive heart failure All randomized patients Endpoint Placebo Carvedilol (n=134) (n=232) Primary endpoint 28 (21%) 25 (11%)* Death due to CHF 4 (3%) 0 (0%) Hospitalization due to worsening CHF 8 (6%) 9 (4%) Increase in CHF medication 16 (12%) 16 (7%) * Placebo vs. carvedilol, p = 0.008 Drugs of Today 1998; 34 (Suppl B): 1-23.
  • 17.
    COPERNICUS: Effect onMortality 35% Mortality (%) 22nd Congress of European Society of Cardiology, August 2000
  • 18.
    COPERNICUS: Mortality reductionin special patient groups with carvedilol Mortality reduction (%) 22nd Congress of European Society of Cardiology, August 2000 EF<20%, hospitalised for heart failure in year prior to study entry EF < 15%, hospitalised 3 or more times during prior year for worsening heart failure
  • 19.
    Carvedilol vs. MetoprololChange in LVEF (%) from baseline Circulation 2000; 102: 546-551
  • 20.
    Dosage guidelines forCarvedilol in heart failure Patient selection Stable on background medications (diuretics, digoxin and/or ACE inhibitors) Not in a fluid-overload state Not hypotensive Before dose increase Evaluate for Worsening heart failure Vasodilation Bradycardia After each new dose initiation Observe for signs of dizziness or light headedness for one hour 3.125 mg bid 2 weeks Doubled every 2 weeks Max dose 25 mg bid (<85 kg); 50 mg bid (>85 kg)
  • 21.
    Management of ComplicationsTransient worsening of heart failure (e.g. increasing dyspnea, decreasing exercise capacity) Increase dose of diuretic and/or ACE inhibitor If necessary, reduce carvedilol dose and/or prolong titration interval Search for other possible causes (e.g. thyroid malfunction, infection, non-compliant drug intake, excessive liquid intake, etc.) Vasodilatory Symptoms (dizziness, light headedness, symptomatic hypotension) Decrease diuretic dose and, if necessary, ACE inhibitor dose If the cessation of both is not successful, reduce carvedilol dose and/or prolong titration interval
  • 22.
    Management of Complications (Contd.) Bradycardia (Pulse rate below 55 beats/min) Check and eventually reduce digitalis dose If necessary, reduce carvedilol dose and/or prolong titration interval Withdraw carvedilol only in the event that hemodynamics are affected Symptoms of Bronchial obstruction Search for other possible causes (e.g., concurrent infection, subacute pulmonary edema) Reduce dose of, or withdraw, carvedilol only after possible causes for symptoms have been ruled out
  • 23.
    The role ofangiotensin II in the progression of heart failure Coronary artery disease Cardiac overload Cardiomyopathy Left ventricular dysfunction  Arterial blood pressure  Angiotensin II  Peripheral organ blood flow  Skeletal muscle blood flow Exercise intolerance  Renal blood flow Oedema Cardiac remodelling Renin release Aldosterone release Vasoconstriction Na+ and water retention Inotropy and hypertrophy of vascular and cardiac cells Left ventricular dilation & hypertrophy Pump failure
  • 24.
    ACE Inhibitors: physiologicbenefits Arteriovenous Vasodilatation  pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure  pulmonary capillary wedge pressure  left ventricular end-diastolic pressure  systemic vascular resistance  systemic blood pressure  maximal oxygen uptake (MVO 2 )
  • 25.
    ACE Inhibitors: physiologic benefits  LV function and cardiac output  renal, coronary, cerebral blood flow No change in heart rate or myocardial contractility no neurohormonal activation resultant diuresis and natriuresis
  • 26.
    ACE Inhibitors: clinical benefits Increases exercise capacity improves functional class attenuation of LV remodeling post MI decrease in the progression of chronic HF decreased hospitalization enhanced quality of life improved survival
  • 27.
    Asymptomatic Patients Enalapril SOLVD Prevention Trial EF<35%  HF progression,  hospitalization Captopril SAVE, GISSI-3, ISIS-4 Post MI, EF <40%  overall mortality,  re-infarction  hospitalization,  HF progression
  • 28.
    Symptomatic Patients Hydralazine+ Isosorbide dinitrate VHeFT-I  mortality, improved functional class as compared with use of digoxin and diuretics VHeFT-II proved less effective than enalapril
  • 29.
    Dosage of ACEinhibitors: ATLAS study Low-dose High-dose (2.5-5 mg) (32.5-35mg) Cardiovascular 44.9% 42.5% mortality All-cause mortality + hospitalisation for 83.8% 79.7% cardiovascular reason All-cause mortality + hospitalisation for 60.4% 55.1% heart failure Circulation 1999;100:2312-18
  • 30.
    AIRE AIRE Studydemonstrated efficacy of ramipril on mortality and morbidity in CHF post-MI NYHA class I-III patients 2006 patients enrolled in a double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled study 27% reduction in the risk of death 23% decrease in progression to severe / resistant heart failure Lancet. 1993; 342:821-828
  • 31.
    Guidelines to ACEInhibitor Therapy Contraindications Renal artery stenosis Renal insufficiency (relative) Hyperkalemia Arterial hypotension Cough Angioedema Alternatives Hydralazine + ISDN, AT-II inhibitor
  • 32.
    Guidelines to ACEInhibitor Therapy All patients with symptomatic heart failure and those in functional class I with significantly reduced left ventricular function should be treated with an ACE inhibitor, unless contraindicated or not tolerated ACE inhibitors should be continued indefinitely It is important to titrate to the dosage regimen used in the clinical trials … in the absence of symptoms or adverse effects on end-organ perfusion In very severe heart failure, hydralazine and nitrates added to ACE inhibitor therapy can further improve cardiac output
  • 33.
    ACE Inhibitor Therapyin Heart Failure Patients (Ejection Fraction < 0.40) Systolic Blood Pressure <100 mmHg (or elevated creatinine) 100-139 mmHg (or recent intense diuresis) > 140 mmHg Lowest Dose, Short-Acting Usual Starting Dose, Long-or Short-Acting Intermediate Dose, Long- or Short-Acting Follow-Up Every 1-2 Weeks Stable BP and Creatinine Level Symptomatic Low BP or Rising Creatinine Level Residual Excess Fluid? Stop Diuretic and ACE Inhibitor Therapy Return to Baseline BP and Creatinine Level ? Increase ACE Inhibitor Dose; Follow-Up Every 1-2 Weeks Target Dose Resume ACE Inhibitor Titration Refer to specialist Stop ACE Inhibitor Therapy Y N Y N
  • 34.
    Diuretics Indicated inpatients with symptoms of heart failure who have evidence of fluid retention Enhance response to other drugs in heart failure such as beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors Therapy initiated with low doses followed by increments in dosage until urine output increases and weight decreases by 0.5-1kg daily
  • 35.
    Digoxin Enhances LVfunction, normalizes baroreceptor-mediated reflexes and increases cardiac output at rest and during exercise Recommended to improve clinical status of patients with heart failure due to LV dysfunction and should be used in conjunction with diuretics, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers Also recommended in patients with heart failure who have atrial fibrillation Digoxin initiated and maintained at a dose of 0.25 mg daily Adverse effects include cardiac arrhythmias, GI symptoms and neurological complaints (eg. visual disturbances, confusion)
  • 36.
    Summary of drugtreatment for CHF Asymptomatic Mild to moderate Moderate LV dysfunction CHF to severe CHF ACE inhibitor Digoxin Digoxin Beta blocker Diuretics Diuretics ACE inhibitor ACE inhibitor Beta blocker Beta blocker Spironolactone