This document discusses using an integrated project-based learning approach to teach principles of information systems courses. It begins by explaining the motivation and benefits of project-based learning according to the National Education Act of 1999 and learning pyramid theory. The objectives are then presented to develop a teaching and learning process for the course using project-based learning. The methodology follows an action research approach involving planning, implementation, observation, and reflection phases. In the planning phase, project-based learning concepts and the Agile model were used to determine the framework. Students then implemented projects on selected topics while the teacher observed. Finally, student performance and learning outcomes were evaluated based on project outputs and questionnaires to assess the effectiveness of the approach.

1. Learning and Teaching Process of
Principles of information system Course
Using Integrated Project-based learning
Watcharee phetwong
Jarunee Thongaram and Krisorn Sawangsire
Information System and Business Computer
Business Administration and Information Technology
Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumni

2. CONTENT
• WHY?
• WHAT?
• HOW?
RESULT?• RESULT?

3. WHY : ?WHY : ?
FORM National Education Act 1999
Identification schools must provide integrated
learning and teaching with the following
characteristics;
1) learning contents and activities conforming to
students interest and skill
2) to nurture students’ thinking, management,2) to nurture students’ thinking, management,
problem solving, and preventive and problem
solving knowledge application process.
3) real-life experience
4) various fields of knowledge
5) encouraging teachers to provide teaching that
enable learners to learn and be
knowledgeable, and apply research as part of
the learning process.
6) to encourage anytime and anywhere learning
with co-operation.

4. WHY : ?WHY : ?
• these characteristics focused on integrated learning
like project-based learning that supported students
to emerge real experience and able to express
their potential while teachers behaved as supporter,
motivator and mentor.motivator and mentor.
• Project-based learning helped students to self-develop
in term of knowledge, ability, skill and experience
• In addition, it motivated students to work
systematically, be team work, and be able to
recommend further improvement

5. WHY :WHY :
• From Learning Pyramid
– Passive learning is normally
teaching that using lecture,
Reading and
Demonstration techniqueDemonstration technique
that can improve student
learning 30-50%
– Active Learning are
Discussion Group , pro
active by doing and teach
others can improve
student learning 50-90%

6. What : Objective ?What : Objective ?
• So the advantage of project-based learning
and the need to develop advance teaching
and learning process
• To develop learning and teaching process of
principles of information system course using
integrated project-based learning.

7. HOW : ?

8. Research MethodologyResearch Methodology
1.
planning
4.
reflect
Action
2. act
3.
observe
Action
research
Kemmis and McTaggart (1988)’s

9. 11 : planning: planning
• Objective to Determining framework of
learning and teaching process of principles of
information system course using integrated
project-based learningproject-based learning
• using content analysis technique
– project-based learning concept (Suchart Wongsuwan, 1999)
– Agile : Model for develop information system
process (Beck, 2001)

10. 22 : act: act
• Objective to Acting follow by planning phase
that do six activities
• And During this phase, teacher acted like an
observer on students’observer on students’
• presentation in the class and discussion about
what they learned.

11. 33 : observe: observe
• Objective to evaluate the effectiveness of
learning and teaching process of principles
of information system course using
integrated project-based learningintegrated project-based learning
•
–Evaluating students’ performance
– By 5 experts
– Evaluation Student’s Learning Outcomes
(TQF) By 5 students

12. 3 : Observe : Evaluating students’
performance
– Evaluate output) : web site
– Evaluator : 5 exerts
• 2 information system experts
• 2 learning and teaching experts
• 1 Content expert (director of Suphanburi Office for Local
Administration)Administration)
• Evaluate Form (tools for collection data : 100
marks)
• information system concept 20 marks
• content 20 marks
• computer and graphic technique 40 marks
• presentation 20 marks
• Analysis : mean, S.D.

13. 33 : Observe :: Observe : Evaluation Student’sEvaluation Student’s
Learning Outcomes (TQF)Learning Outcomes (TQF)
• Who : 49 students that regis in
principle of information system
• Tool : Questionnaire (5 Likert scales)• Tool : Questionnaire (5 Likert scales)
1) ethics and moral
2) knowledge
3) cognitive skills
4) interpersonal skill and responsibility,
5) numerical analysis, communication and technology skills.
• Analysis : Mean, S.D.

14. 3. RESULT:?

15. ResultResult
3.1) learning and teaching process using
integrated project-based learning.
3.2) project-based learning and teaching
project evaluation.project evaluation.

16. Result :Result : 33..11) learning and teaching process) learning and teaching process
using integrated projectusing integrated project--based learningbased learning
1.1 Project title
selection
1.5 Report
writing
1.4
Project implementation
1.2 Literature review
1.3
Project framework
writing and
presentation
1.6
Presentation
Agile Model

17. Result :3.1.1 Project title selection

18. Result : 3.1.2 Literature review
Tools for
develop
website
Government
website
standard
content

19. Result : 3.1.3
Project framework writing and present

20. Result : 3.1.4 Project implementation :
• Requirement • Design

21. Result : 1.4 Project implementation :
• Development • Test

22. Result : 3.1.5 report writing

23. Result : 3.1.6 presentation (1)
Students’ project exhibition at Lanpho, Samchuk ancient market
on October 6, 2013

24. Result : 3.1.6 presentation (2)

25. 33..22) project) project--based learning andbased learning and
teaching project evaluationteaching project evaluation
3.2.1 Evaluating students’
performance
3.2.2 Evaluation Student’s Learning
Outcomes (TQF)Outcomes (TQF)

26. 33..22..11 Evaluating students’ performanceEvaluating students’ performance
84
72
75
81
75
80
85
90
95
100
=72.50 , S.D. = 6.05
68 69 69 70 69
72
75
69
50
55
60
65
70
75

27. 33..22..22 Evaluation Student’sEvaluation Student’s
Learning Outcomes (TQF)Learning Outcomes (TQF)
4.48 4.45 4.45 4.50 4.55

28. question
• What's the Difference Between Doing Projects
and Project Based Learning?
• http://www.friedtechnology.com/2012/11/wh• http://www.friedtechnology.com/2012/11/wh
ats-difference-between-doing-projects.html

30. DiscussionsDiscussions
• This research
• Agile model
• exhibition method for
presentation
• Other research
• Addle model
• Report writing and class
presentation forpresentation
• Evaluation 2 parts
– Evaluate output from
experts
– Learning outcome from
students
presentation for
presentation
• other studies had
evaluated from students

31. PLANING :PLANING : การวางแผนการวางแผน