Krashen's 6 Hypothesis
Second Language Acquisition
Presented by
Beatriz Portillo Guevara
Galitzia Calderon Trejo
•Objective: Let’s describe The 6 Krashen’s
Hypothesis by using a power point
presentation, to have a discussion with
the class, to find out the benefits of
taking this knowledge into consideration
when teaching.
•About 25 years ago, a
psychologist named Stephen
Krashen transformed language
teaching. He had been
developing his ideas over a
number of years, but several
books he published in the 1980s
received widespread acceptance.
“Language acquisition occurs
when language is used for what
it was designed for,
communication.”
Stephen Krashen
Comprises of six main hypotheses:
1.Acquisition-Learning hypothesis
2.Monitor hypothesis
3.Natural Order hypothesis
4.Input hypothesis
5.Affective Filter hypothesis
6.The Reading Hypothesis
Second Language Acquisition Theory
The acquisition-learning
hypothesis
The “acquired system” and The
“learned system”
What is the difference
between
LEARNING a language
and ADQUIRING a
language?
Acquisition Learning
• Subconscious process
• Meaningful interaction
• Communicative act
• Product of
subconscious
• Depends on attitude
• Conscious process
• Formal instruction
• Grammar
• Product of formal
learning
• Depends on aptitude
Krashen’s Hypotheses:
1. The acquisition-learning hypothesis.
There is a difference between
learning, which is purposeful and
conscious, and acquisition which is
natural and subconscious.
(Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
There are five different stages in the
second language acquisition process:
1. The Silent Period
2. The Early Production Period
3. The Speech Emergence Period
4. The Intermediate Production Period
5. The Advanced Production Period
Application for Teaching
• According to this theory, the optimal way
a language is learned is through natural
communication.
• As a second language teacher,
the ideal is to create a situation
wherein language is used in
order to fulfill authentic
purposes. This is turn, will help
students to ‘acquire’ the
language instead of just
‘learning’ it.
Krashen’s hypotheses:
2. The monitor hypothesis. This
hypothesis states that conscious
learning functions only as a monitor
to edit and correct the output of the
acquired language.
(Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
Use learned language to self-
correct what is acquired.
Application for Teaching
•As an SL teacher it will always be a
challenge to strike a balance between
encouraging accuracy and fluency in
your students.
This balance will depend on numerous
variables including:
•The language level of the students
•The context of language use
•The personal goals of each student.
What is Communicative Competency?
•Communicative competency is the
correlation between fluency and
accuracy.
“Language is best taught when it is
being used to transmit messages, not
when it is explicitly taught for
conscious learning.”
(Krashen and Terrell, 1995)
Krashen’s hypotheses:
3. The natural order hypothesis. This
hypothesis states that grammatical
structures are acquired in a
predictable order just the same way
that the native speaker learned their
native language.
(Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
Step by step
Predictable order
She is walking instead of She walked
•The acquisition of grammatical structures
follows a “natural order” which is
predictable.
•English is perhaps the most studied
language as far as natural order
hypothesis is concerned, and of all
structures of English, morphology is the
most studied.
Application for Teaching
•This hypothesis highlights the importance of
using the Target Language in the
classroom. The goal of any language
program is for learners to be able to
communicate effectively.
•By providing as much comprehensible input
as possible, especially in situations when
learners are not exposed to the TL outside
of the classroom, the teacher is able to
create a more effective opportunity for
language acquisition.
Krashen’s hypotheses:
4. The input hypothesis. The Input Hypothesis
states that students acquire language when
they need to understand input that is slightly
beyond their level of competence. “Krashen
refers to this by the formula L +1 (where L+1 is
the stage immediately following L along some
natural order.)”
(Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
Application for Teaching
•According to this hypothesis, teachers
should be aware that certain structures
of a language are easier to acquire than
others and therefore language
structures should be taught in an order
that is conductive to learning.
•Teachers should start by introducing
language concepts that are relatively
easy for learners to acquire and then
use scaffolding to introduce more
difficult concepts.
Krashen’s hypotheses:
5. The affective filter hypothesis. This
hypothesis states that emotional
factors can block or affect the process
of acquisition.
(Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
 The main emotional attitude
factors of motivation, self-
confidence, and anxiety can
impede language acquisition.
A students with high affective
filter are less likely to learn.
The teacher should promote a
low anxiety, low stress
environment.
•According to Krashen we acquire a
language when we are given
comprehensible input in low-anxiety
situations and when we are presented
with interesting and meaningful
messages that we actually understand.
Application for Teaching
•In any aspect of education it is always important
to create a safe, welcoming environment in
which students can learn. In language education
this may be especially important since in order
to take in and produce language, learners need
to feel that they are able to make mistakes and
take risks. This relates to directly to Krashen’s
hypothesis of the affective filter.
Krashen’s hypotheses:
6. The Reading Hypothesis. This
hypothesis states that the more we
read in a SL the greater our
vocabulary.
Application for Teaching
It is important to involve reading in the
language classroom to increase knowledge of
the language and the way it is used in real-life
contexts.
Thanks for your
attention!

Krashen's 6 hyphotesis

  • 1.
    Krashen's 6 Hypothesis SecondLanguage Acquisition Presented by Beatriz Portillo Guevara Galitzia Calderon Trejo
  • 2.
    •Objective: Let’s describeThe 6 Krashen’s Hypothesis by using a power point presentation, to have a discussion with the class, to find out the benefits of taking this knowledge into consideration when teaching.
  • 3.
    •About 25 yearsago, a psychologist named Stephen Krashen transformed language teaching. He had been developing his ideas over a number of years, but several books he published in the 1980s received widespread acceptance.
  • 4.
    “Language acquisition occurs whenlanguage is used for what it was designed for, communication.” Stephen Krashen
  • 5.
    Comprises of sixmain hypotheses: 1.Acquisition-Learning hypothesis 2.Monitor hypothesis 3.Natural Order hypothesis 4.Input hypothesis 5.Affective Filter hypothesis 6.The Reading Hypothesis Second Language Acquisition Theory
  • 6.
    The acquisition-learning hypothesis The “acquiredsystem” and The “learned system”
  • 7.
    What is thedifference between LEARNING a language and ADQUIRING a language?
  • 8.
    Acquisition Learning • Subconsciousprocess • Meaningful interaction • Communicative act • Product of subconscious • Depends on attitude • Conscious process • Formal instruction • Grammar • Product of formal learning • Depends on aptitude
  • 9.
    Krashen’s Hypotheses: 1. Theacquisition-learning hypothesis. There is a difference between learning, which is purposeful and conscious, and acquisition which is natural and subconscious. (Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
  • 10.
    There are fivedifferent stages in the second language acquisition process: 1. The Silent Period 2. The Early Production Period 3. The Speech Emergence Period 4. The Intermediate Production Period 5. The Advanced Production Period
  • 11.
    Application for Teaching •According to this theory, the optimal way a language is learned is through natural communication.
  • 12.
    • As asecond language teacher, the ideal is to create a situation wherein language is used in order to fulfill authentic purposes. This is turn, will help students to ‘acquire’ the language instead of just ‘learning’ it.
  • 13.
    Krashen’s hypotheses: 2. Themonitor hypothesis. This hypothesis states that conscious learning functions only as a monitor to edit and correct the output of the acquired language. (Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
  • 14.
    Use learned languageto self- correct what is acquired.
  • 15.
    Application for Teaching •Asan SL teacher it will always be a challenge to strike a balance between encouraging accuracy and fluency in your students.
  • 16.
    This balance willdepend on numerous variables including: •The language level of the students •The context of language use •The personal goals of each student.
  • 17.
    What is CommunicativeCompetency? •Communicative competency is the correlation between fluency and accuracy.
  • 18.
    “Language is besttaught when it is being used to transmit messages, not when it is explicitly taught for conscious learning.” (Krashen and Terrell, 1995)
  • 19.
    Krashen’s hypotheses: 3. Thenatural order hypothesis. This hypothesis states that grammatical structures are acquired in a predictable order just the same way that the native speaker learned their native language. (Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
  • 20.
    Step by step Predictableorder She is walking instead of She walked
  • 21.
    •The acquisition ofgrammatical structures follows a “natural order” which is predictable. •English is perhaps the most studied language as far as natural order hypothesis is concerned, and of all structures of English, morphology is the most studied.
  • 22.
    Application for Teaching •Thishypothesis highlights the importance of using the Target Language in the classroom. The goal of any language program is for learners to be able to communicate effectively.
  • 23.
    •By providing asmuch comprehensible input as possible, especially in situations when learners are not exposed to the TL outside of the classroom, the teacher is able to create a more effective opportunity for language acquisition.
  • 24.
    Krashen’s hypotheses: 4. Theinput hypothesis. The Input Hypothesis states that students acquire language when they need to understand input that is slightly beyond their level of competence. “Krashen refers to this by the formula L +1 (where L+1 is the stage immediately following L along some natural order.)” (Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
  • 25.
    Application for Teaching •Accordingto this hypothesis, teachers should be aware that certain structures of a language are easier to acquire than others and therefore language structures should be taught in an order that is conductive to learning.
  • 26.
    •Teachers should startby introducing language concepts that are relatively easy for learners to acquire and then use scaffolding to introduce more difficult concepts.
  • 27.
    Krashen’s hypotheses: 5. Theaffective filter hypothesis. This hypothesis states that emotional factors can block or affect the process of acquisition. (Markee 1997, pp. 25–26)
  • 28.
     The mainemotional attitude factors of motivation, self- confidence, and anxiety can impede language acquisition.
  • 29.
    A students withhigh affective filter are less likely to learn. The teacher should promote a low anxiety, low stress environment.
  • 30.
    •According to Krashenwe acquire a language when we are given comprehensible input in low-anxiety situations and when we are presented with interesting and meaningful messages that we actually understand.
  • 31.
    Application for Teaching •Inany aspect of education it is always important to create a safe, welcoming environment in which students can learn. In language education this may be especially important since in order to take in and produce language, learners need to feel that they are able to make mistakes and take risks. This relates to directly to Krashen’s hypothesis of the affective filter.
  • 32.
    Krashen’s hypotheses: 6. TheReading Hypothesis. This hypothesis states that the more we read in a SL the greater our vocabulary.
  • 33.
    Application for Teaching Itis important to involve reading in the language classroom to increase knowledge of the language and the way it is used in real-life contexts.
  • 34.