This document summarizes the key discussions from three panels at the Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2017. The panels discussed: 1) the progress and remaining challenges of chemicals legislation over the last decade, 2) how chemicals relate to sustainability goals and encouraging business to see chemicals as a sustainability issue, and 3) trends influencing the global chemicals supply chain and opportunities to promote product safety. Common themes across the panels included regulatory harmonization, integrating chemicals issues into other policy areas like sustainability and circular economy, and using digital tools and new business models to facilitate sharing of chemical information and ensuring product safety.
PANEL 5: Substances of concern (SVHCs) in products – whose job is it to control these in a free trade world? - Karin Kilian, Policy Officer, EU-Commission
This document summarizes progress made and remaining challenges in developing new approach methods for regulatory toxicology assessments. It outlines several new approach methods developed including high-throughput in vitro screening databases and models. However, it notes remaining scientific challenges including limited metabolic and biological complexity of current in vitro assays and gaps in exposure and dosimetry data. The document also discusses philosophical challenges in validating new approach methods, defining adversity at the molecular level, and gaining acceptance for qualitative and quantitative uncertainties compared to traditional animal studies.
Jim Jones, US EPA Acting Assistant Administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, delivered the keynote presentation at the Commission for Environmental Cooperation's (CEC) Chemicals Management Forum held in San Antonio, Texas, on May 15, 2012
Australia regulates industrial chemicals at the federal, state, and local levels. Recent reforms to the National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) aim to streamline risk assessment processes and increase utilization of international data sharing. NICNAS has already successfully shared assessment materials and engaged in data sharing initiatives through bilateral and multilateral partnerships. Going forward, NICNAS intends to continue publishing publicly available information, aligning regulatory approaches, and promoting greater harmonization of chemical assessment globally to further enhance the efficiency of regulation and availability of safety information.
This document summarizes the key discussions from three panels at the Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2017. The panels discussed: 1) the progress and remaining challenges of chemicals legislation over the last decade, 2) how chemicals relate to sustainability goals and encouraging business to see chemicals as a sustainability issue, and 3) trends influencing the global chemicals supply chain and opportunities to promote product safety. Common themes across the panels included regulatory harmonization, integrating chemicals issues into other policy areas like sustainability and circular economy, and using digital tools and new business models to facilitate sharing of chemical information and ensuring product safety.
PANEL 5: Substances of concern (SVHCs) in products – whose job is it to control these in a free trade world? - Karin Kilian, Policy Officer, EU-Commission
This document summarizes progress made and remaining challenges in developing new approach methods for regulatory toxicology assessments. It outlines several new approach methods developed including high-throughput in vitro screening databases and models. However, it notes remaining scientific challenges including limited metabolic and biological complexity of current in vitro assays and gaps in exposure and dosimetry data. The document also discusses philosophical challenges in validating new approach methods, defining adversity at the molecular level, and gaining acceptance for qualitative and quantitative uncertainties compared to traditional animal studies.
Jim Jones, US EPA Acting Assistant Administrator for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, delivered the keynote presentation at the Commission for Environmental Cooperation's (CEC) Chemicals Management Forum held in San Antonio, Texas, on May 15, 2012
Australia regulates industrial chemicals at the federal, state, and local levels. Recent reforms to the National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) aim to streamline risk assessment processes and increase utilization of international data sharing. NICNAS has already successfully shared assessment materials and engaged in data sharing initiatives through bilateral and multilateral partnerships. Going forward, NICNAS intends to continue publishing publicly available information, aligning regulatory approaches, and promoting greater harmonization of chemical assessment globally to further enhance the efficiency of regulation and availability of safety information.
PANEL 3: Priority setting of chemicals – potential for harmonisation and synergies
Presentation: Mike Rasenberg, Head of Computational Assessment and Dissemination Unit, ECHA
PANEL 4: Speeding up chemical assessments: from novel information to new management approaches, what works? - Erika Kunz, Head of Global Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals, Clariant, Germany
The document discusses the EU's legislative framework for chemicals management beyond 2020. It notes that the current system aims to protect the environment and health while also promoting innovation and a free market. Key legislation like REACH and CLP establish requirements for risk assessment, management, and documentation. The system also contributes to a circular economy by facilitating the merging of chemicals and waste policies and enabling material recycling. Areas that have gone well include REACH and CLP implementation, while aspects needing improvement relate to integration across different policies on chemicals, waste, and occupational safety.
The document discusses OECD's Mutual Acceptance of Data (MAD) system, which aims to avoid duplicative testing of chemicals by industry and reduce non-tariff trade barriers. Under MAD, toxicological and ecotoxicological data generated in OECD countries in accordance with OECD Test Guidelines and Good Laboratory Practice principles must be accepted by other OECD members for regulatory purposes. Approximately 160 Test Guidelines cover various endpoints. Guidelines are regularly updated to meet regulatory needs. MAD is estimated to result in over 300 million euros in annual net savings through eliminating redundant testing.
The document summarizes key discussions from panels at the Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2018 on the first day. It discusses trends in chemicals management globally and opportunities for capacity building. One panel focused on communicating risks related to endocrine disruptors, noting the evolving scientific understanding and regulatory challenges. Another panel addressed potential for harmonization across countries in setting chemical priorities, highlighting common approaches to risk-based screening and the need for transparent communication. The concluding remarks encouraged sharing experiences to speed capacity building and taking advantage of frameworks like the UN Sustainable Development Goals to better integrate chemicals management globally.
Canada's Chemicals Management Plan aims to reduce risks from chemicals to Canadians and the environment. Substances are assessed for harm and actions are taken to control risks. The government committed to developing a long-term strategy to systematically assess the effectiveness of actions controlling toxic substances. Measuring performance establishes indicators, collects data on substance levels, evaluates current conditions against baselines, and identifies needed monitoring and follow up actions. Challenges include inconsistent data, appropriate population representation, timing of data availability, and resource requirements. Performance measurement can improve public health and the environment while minimizing future costs through earlier recognition of concerns.
The document discusses the regulatory work being done on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) under the EU's REACH and CLP regulations. It outlines the processes for harmonized classification and labeling, identification as substances of very high concern, and restrictions. It describes the collaborative approach between EU agencies and member states to assess PFASs of concern, including identifying precursor substances. Current activities include mass screenings, degradation path studies, hazard assessments, and risk management analyses. Challenges include the large number of PFASs, data gaps, and need for global collaboration on articles.
Measuring the performance of chemical management systems is important to assess impact with limited resources and ensure efficiency. There are several types of indicators to measure performance, including impact indicators related to chemicals-related diseases and environmental impacts, result indicators on chemical levels in human and environmental samples, and output indicators like restricted substances. However, accurately measuring impact indicators is challenging due to complex attribution of health effects and lack of data, and result indicators are limited to known chemicals with inconsistent monitoring. Harmonization of research, monitoring, and testing is needed to strengthen performance measurement of chemical management systems.
This document summarizes key discussions from Day 2 of the Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2017. It discusses several panels on topics like novel approaches to hazard data assessment, the role of organizations like OECD, and controlling hazardous substances in complex supply chains. Some highlights included using grouping approaches and big data to speed up chemical assessments, gaining experience through regulatory application of novel methods, and the need for international alignment and a systematic approach for tracking substances of concern in products. The concluding remarks thanked attendees and invited them to the following year's forum.
PANEL 3: Priority setting of chemicals – potential for harmonisation and synergies
Presentation: Michael Walls, Vice President – Regulatory and Technical Affairs, American Chemistry Council, US
Grouping substances based on their similar structure and effects could help avoid regrettable substitution and play catch up regulation. Regulatory controls are needed for substance groups to improve data quality for registrations and restrict chemicals of concern from the market. Companies would bear the burden of proving a substance does not share hazardous properties with its group. Approaching regulation by groups could more efficiently lead to safer chemicals and uses.
UNEP has several programs to promote plant safety and reduce industrial risks. The APELL program promotes emergency preparedness at the local level through community participation and multi-stakeholder planning. The Flexible Framework provides guidance for governments to develop chemical accident prevention programs nationally. The Responsible Production approach provides guidance and tools for SMEs to improve safety practices along the supply chain. Both programs emphasize adaptability, flexibility, transparency, and collaboration among stakeholders.
Global Forum on Environment dedicated to chemicals management: Satoru Morishi...OECD Environment
The Global Forum on Environment discussed the challenges posed by chemicals, provided knowledge on effective and sustainable policies for the sound management of chemicals. Together, leading actors in the field of chemicals management promoted effective engagement, collaboration and action on the sound management of chemicals and waste. The speakers included regulators and policy makers in charge of chemical safety in OECD member and partner countries as well as relevant stakeholders from International Governmental Organisations, private industry organisations and companies, civil society, philanthropies and more.
Session 4 aimed to identify (i) the issues of common interest between Members and Partners where OECD could help design solutions; and (ii) ways the OECD can help implement the post-2020 UN framework for the sound management of chemicals and waste, possibly through Partnerships with other stakeholders, especially the other IOMC Participating Organisations.
Global Forum on Environment dedicated to chemicals management: Sebahattin Dö...OECD Environment
Turkey has established regulations to manage chemicals in line with international conventions. The TR REACH regulation establishes requirements for chemical registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction. Over 52,850 chemicals have been notified under the CLP regulation. The POPS regulation prohibits 15 substances and restricts the use of 12 others. Turkey has ratified the Stockholm and Rotterdam Conventions and is working to ratify the Minamata Convention. Projects are also helping to assess chemicals, eliminate legacy POPs, and remediate contaminated sites. Proper chemicals management is important for both human and environmental health.
This document summarizes an annual report card that benchmarks retailers on their policies addressing toxic chemicals. It evaluates forty retailers across twelve sectors on fourteen criteria related to chemical safety. The criteria examine elements like eliminating chemicals of high concern and increasing transparency. The report found that since 2016, eleven retailers improved their grade from a D+ to a C+ by strengthening existing policies or adopting new ones. It also notes recent policy developments from retailers like Lowe's, Whole Foods, Trader Joe's, Amazon, Target, Walmart, and Dollar Tree aimed at restricting additional toxic chemicals.
The document discusses how the National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) groups substances for assessment and avoids regrettable substitution. It notes that NICNAS assessed over 4,000 chemicals at tier 2, grouping over 3,600 into 333 groups based on toxicophore similarity, common toxic species, mode of action, and physicochemical properties. It describes how the confidence in grouping predictions increases with more evidence and can range from priority setting to severe restrictions, depending on the consequence and justification. The new Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS) will take over from NICNAS from July 2020 with a more risk-proportionate and post-market focused approach.
PANEL 5: Substances of concern (SVHCs) in products – whose job is it to control these in a free trade world? - Kevin Mulvaney, Senior Director, ACC, USA
PANEL 4: Speeding up chemical assessments: from novel information to new management approaches, what works? - Brian Richards, Executive Director, Office of Chemical Safety, Australia
Margaret Kenny, Director General, Chemicals Sector, Environment Canada and Member of the SMOC Working Group of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation spoke about Canada's Chemicals Management Plan at the Chemicals Management Forum in San Antonio, Texas, May 15, 2012. More info. at: http://www.cec.org/chemicals2012
Canada's Chemicals Management Plan has a closing timeline of 2020 and although it seem far away the question is how will it help or hinder your business in the use of chemicals and what changes MUST you apply in your business?
PANEL 3: Priority setting of chemicals – potential for harmonisation and synergies
Presentation: Mike Rasenberg, Head of Computational Assessment and Dissemination Unit, ECHA
PANEL 4: Speeding up chemical assessments: from novel information to new management approaches, what works? - Erika Kunz, Head of Global Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals, Clariant, Germany
The document discusses the EU's legislative framework for chemicals management beyond 2020. It notes that the current system aims to protect the environment and health while also promoting innovation and a free market. Key legislation like REACH and CLP establish requirements for risk assessment, management, and documentation. The system also contributes to a circular economy by facilitating the merging of chemicals and waste policies and enabling material recycling. Areas that have gone well include REACH and CLP implementation, while aspects needing improvement relate to integration across different policies on chemicals, waste, and occupational safety.
The document discusses OECD's Mutual Acceptance of Data (MAD) system, which aims to avoid duplicative testing of chemicals by industry and reduce non-tariff trade barriers. Under MAD, toxicological and ecotoxicological data generated in OECD countries in accordance with OECD Test Guidelines and Good Laboratory Practice principles must be accepted by other OECD members for regulatory purposes. Approximately 160 Test Guidelines cover various endpoints. Guidelines are regularly updated to meet regulatory needs. MAD is estimated to result in over 300 million euros in annual net savings through eliminating redundant testing.
The document summarizes key discussions from panels at the Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2018 on the first day. It discusses trends in chemicals management globally and opportunities for capacity building. One panel focused on communicating risks related to endocrine disruptors, noting the evolving scientific understanding and regulatory challenges. Another panel addressed potential for harmonization across countries in setting chemical priorities, highlighting common approaches to risk-based screening and the need for transparent communication. The concluding remarks encouraged sharing experiences to speed capacity building and taking advantage of frameworks like the UN Sustainable Development Goals to better integrate chemicals management globally.
Canada's Chemicals Management Plan aims to reduce risks from chemicals to Canadians and the environment. Substances are assessed for harm and actions are taken to control risks. The government committed to developing a long-term strategy to systematically assess the effectiveness of actions controlling toxic substances. Measuring performance establishes indicators, collects data on substance levels, evaluates current conditions against baselines, and identifies needed monitoring and follow up actions. Challenges include inconsistent data, appropriate population representation, timing of data availability, and resource requirements. Performance measurement can improve public health and the environment while minimizing future costs through earlier recognition of concerns.
The document discusses the regulatory work being done on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) under the EU's REACH and CLP regulations. It outlines the processes for harmonized classification and labeling, identification as substances of very high concern, and restrictions. It describes the collaborative approach between EU agencies and member states to assess PFASs of concern, including identifying precursor substances. Current activities include mass screenings, degradation path studies, hazard assessments, and risk management analyses. Challenges include the large number of PFASs, data gaps, and need for global collaboration on articles.
Measuring the performance of chemical management systems is important to assess impact with limited resources and ensure efficiency. There are several types of indicators to measure performance, including impact indicators related to chemicals-related diseases and environmental impacts, result indicators on chemical levels in human and environmental samples, and output indicators like restricted substances. However, accurately measuring impact indicators is challenging due to complex attribution of health effects and lack of data, and result indicators are limited to known chemicals with inconsistent monitoring. Harmonization of research, monitoring, and testing is needed to strengthen performance measurement of chemical management systems.
This document summarizes key discussions from Day 2 of the Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2017. It discusses several panels on topics like novel approaches to hazard data assessment, the role of organizations like OECD, and controlling hazardous substances in complex supply chains. Some highlights included using grouping approaches and big data to speed up chemical assessments, gaining experience through regulatory application of novel methods, and the need for international alignment and a systematic approach for tracking substances of concern in products. The concluding remarks thanked attendees and invited them to the following year's forum.
PANEL 3: Priority setting of chemicals – potential for harmonisation and synergies
Presentation: Michael Walls, Vice President – Regulatory and Technical Affairs, American Chemistry Council, US
Grouping substances based on their similar structure and effects could help avoid regrettable substitution and play catch up regulation. Regulatory controls are needed for substance groups to improve data quality for registrations and restrict chemicals of concern from the market. Companies would bear the burden of proving a substance does not share hazardous properties with its group. Approaching regulation by groups could more efficiently lead to safer chemicals and uses.
UNEP has several programs to promote plant safety and reduce industrial risks. The APELL program promotes emergency preparedness at the local level through community participation and multi-stakeholder planning. The Flexible Framework provides guidance for governments to develop chemical accident prevention programs nationally. The Responsible Production approach provides guidance and tools for SMEs to improve safety practices along the supply chain. Both programs emphasize adaptability, flexibility, transparency, and collaboration among stakeholders.
Global Forum on Environment dedicated to chemicals management: Satoru Morishi...OECD Environment
The Global Forum on Environment discussed the challenges posed by chemicals, provided knowledge on effective and sustainable policies for the sound management of chemicals. Together, leading actors in the field of chemicals management promoted effective engagement, collaboration and action on the sound management of chemicals and waste. The speakers included regulators and policy makers in charge of chemical safety in OECD member and partner countries as well as relevant stakeholders from International Governmental Organisations, private industry organisations and companies, civil society, philanthropies and more.
Session 4 aimed to identify (i) the issues of common interest between Members and Partners where OECD could help design solutions; and (ii) ways the OECD can help implement the post-2020 UN framework for the sound management of chemicals and waste, possibly through Partnerships with other stakeholders, especially the other IOMC Participating Organisations.
Global Forum on Environment dedicated to chemicals management: Sebahattin Dö...OECD Environment
Turkey has established regulations to manage chemicals in line with international conventions. The TR REACH regulation establishes requirements for chemical registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction. Over 52,850 chemicals have been notified under the CLP regulation. The POPS regulation prohibits 15 substances and restricts the use of 12 others. Turkey has ratified the Stockholm and Rotterdam Conventions and is working to ratify the Minamata Convention. Projects are also helping to assess chemicals, eliminate legacy POPs, and remediate contaminated sites. Proper chemicals management is important for both human and environmental health.
This document summarizes an annual report card that benchmarks retailers on their policies addressing toxic chemicals. It evaluates forty retailers across twelve sectors on fourteen criteria related to chemical safety. The criteria examine elements like eliminating chemicals of high concern and increasing transparency. The report found that since 2016, eleven retailers improved their grade from a D+ to a C+ by strengthening existing policies or adopting new ones. It also notes recent policy developments from retailers like Lowe's, Whole Foods, Trader Joe's, Amazon, Target, Walmart, and Dollar Tree aimed at restricting additional toxic chemicals.
The document discusses how the National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS) groups substances for assessment and avoids regrettable substitution. It notes that NICNAS assessed over 4,000 chemicals at tier 2, grouping over 3,600 into 333 groups based on toxicophore similarity, common toxic species, mode of action, and physicochemical properties. It describes how the confidence in grouping predictions increases with more evidence and can range from priority setting to severe restrictions, depending on the consequence and justification. The new Australian Industrial Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS) will take over from NICNAS from July 2020 with a more risk-proportionate and post-market focused approach.
PANEL 5: Substances of concern (SVHCs) in products – whose job is it to control these in a free trade world? - Kevin Mulvaney, Senior Director, ACC, USA
PANEL 4: Speeding up chemical assessments: from novel information to new management approaches, what works? - Brian Richards, Executive Director, Office of Chemical Safety, Australia
Margaret Kenny, Director General, Chemicals Sector, Environment Canada and Member of the SMOC Working Group of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation spoke about Canada's Chemicals Management Plan at the Chemicals Management Forum in San Antonio, Texas, May 15, 2012. More info. at: http://www.cec.org/chemicals2012
Canada's Chemicals Management Plan has a closing timeline of 2020 and although it seem far away the question is how will it help or hinder your business in the use of chemicals and what changes MUST you apply in your business?
Barbara Cunningham, Deputy Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and Chair of the SMOC Working Group of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation speaks at the Chemicals Management Forum in San Antonio, Texas, on May 15, 2012. More information at http://www.cec.org/chemicals2012
Mexico has shown international leadership in developing legislation, policy and programmes to support its transition to a low carbon economy. A general law on climate change was recently approved and a long term climate change strategy is under implementation, together with a multi-stakeholder approach to develop an institutional MRV framework to support NAMAs and LEDS.
The institutional MRV framework being implemented aims to go beyond simply tracking emission reductions and includes a set of measures, systems and registries to perform policy evaluation, institutional strengthening and ultimately support decision-making. Currently the MRV framework in Mexico consists of several mechanisms, including laws, reporting rules, estimation methodologies, and coordination among different institutions of the public and private sector.
These mechanisms continue to be developed and continuously improved and currently serve as a good example of progress towards a comprehensive national MRV framework.
The MRV institutional framework has long been financed through the Mexican Federal Government. However, several of the estimation methodologies, instruments, processes and policy design, particularly as they are related to LEDS and NAMAs, are funded with resources from international sources. Donors include the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, the European Union, the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) through its International Climate Initiative (IKI), IADB, KfW, UNDP, USAID, and World Bank. Several donors are keen to work with the country, as Mexico’s development of an MRV framework makes it easier to track impact, making technical cooperation financing relatively more attractive than in other countries.
The document summarizes a participatory research project using the ARIA toolkit to analyze climate change policy and institutions in Saint Lucia and Trinidad & Tobago. The project aimed to improve capacity for developing and implementing effective climate change adaptation by having civil society research priority areas like water resources, food security, and tourism. The research identified recommendations to strengthen policies, institutions, and actions. Final reports analyzed the current state and identified priority next steps to influence policy through greater civil society participation and advocacy. Next steps include engaging agencies in Saint Lucia and disseminating findings and the ARIA toolkit in other Caribbean countries.
North American Commission For Environmental Cooperation
Mexico has several initiatives and programs focused on chemicals management and environmental sustainability through 2030 including conserving ecosystems, sustainable water use, climate change mitigation and adaptation, reducing pollution, and comprehensive chemicals and waste management. Key priorities include implementing plans under the Stockholm Convention to eliminate POPs, reducing COPNI in the environment, and increasing public participation. Mexico also participates in initiatives under the Rotterdam and Basel Conventions and is working to update its chemicals inventory and profiles while increasing synergy across international agreements. A National Advisory Committee provides recommendations to ensure shared responsibility across sectors in protecting the environment and human health from chemicals.
Sharing first experiences on REDD+ Safeguards and Related Benefit Sharing Mec...CIFOR-ICRAF
This presentation was delivered at the third Asia-Pacific Forestry Week 2016, in Clark Freeport Zone, Philippines.
The five sub-thematic streams at APFW 2016 included:
Pathways to prosperity: Future trade and markets
Tackling climate change: challenges and opportunities
Serving society: forestry and people
New institutions, new governance
Our green future: green investment and growing our natural assets
OECD Green Talks LIVE: Global eChemPortal to information on chemical substancesOECD Environment
To meet public health and environmental objectives for the safe use of chemicals under proper conditions, increasing understanding of chemical hazards and risks is key. By increasing access to data and information, governments and industry can work to reduce – or even eliminate – adverse health effects from exposures to chemicals.
The OECD eChemPortal provides direct access to critical scientific information on chemical substances of regulatory relevance with over 800,000 substance records from 37 databases. The portal allows countries and companies to share work, ensure resource efficiencies, and, subsequently, reduce animal testing.
Gerlinde Knetch (Germany), Jake Sanderson (Canada) and Violaine Verougstraete from Eurometaux shared their experience in improving chemical safety and how the eChemPortal supported this process.
The document discusses environmental challenges and responses in Pakistan. It covers:
- Pakistan's initial lack of environmental awareness and weak enforcement of environmental laws in the early 1980s.
- The 1992 Earth Summit and creation of Pakistan's National Conservation Strategy helped raise environmental awareness and build institutions.
- The next challenge was translating environmental policies into actions, leading to a National Environmental Action Plan focusing on clean air/water, waste management, and ecosystems.
- Pakistan's environmental policy and legal framework, including the National Conservation Strategy of 1992 and Environmental Protection Act of 1997, helped operationalize environmental protection efforts.
Leonora Rojas Bracho, General Director of Urban and Regional Pollution Research, National Institute of Ecology (INE-Semarnat) and Member of the SMOC Working Group, spoke at the CEC Chemicals Management Forum in San Antonio, Texas, on May 16, 2012. More information at: http://www.cec.org/chemicals2012
Session 3 ceville oas ex-post evaluation of env effectsOECD Environment
This document summarizes an ex-post evaluation of the environmental effects of the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR). CAFTA-DR included environmental provisions and an Environmental Cooperation Agreement. The evaluation examines the agreement's goals of improving environmental protection, transparency, and compliance. It describes the institutions established to oversee environmental cooperation under CAFTA-DR and evaluates the agreement's effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability using a results-based monitoring approach. The evaluation identifies both challenges in implementing the ambitious environmental programs and opportunities to share lessons learned to improve future agreements.
Lorie Sheremeta_Governance of nanomaterials and nanotechnologies a canadian p...Ne3LS_Network
This document provides a Canadian perspective on governance of nanomaterials and nanotechnologies. It discusses what governance is, why it is important for nanotechnology, and who the key stakeholders are. It describes Canada's general approach to regulating emerging technologies by waiting for evidence before implementing new rules. Challenges in regulating nanomaterials under Canadian laws are outlined. The roles of Environment Canada and Health Canada in assessing nanomaterials as new substances are explained. Issues around labelling and looking ahead to continuing research on health and environmental impacts are also summarized.
STEP Conference 2019 - Cleaner Air for Scotland ReviewSTEP_scotland
The Cleaner Air for Scotland strategy review made several key conclusions and recommendations:
1) While Scotland has good air quality by EU standards, additional action is needed as health impacts are better understood. Air pollution and climate issues are interconnected.
2) The strategy's structure was complex and implementation uneven; the new strategy needs a simpler governance structure and clearer accountability.
3) A wider range of emission sources beyond transport must be addressed, including domestic burning and agriculture.
4) The recommendations include developing integrated thematic strategies, ensuring new developments don't worsen air quality, improving behavior change programs, and strengthening environmental regulations.
This document discusses building a sustainability plan that lasts. It covers key drivers of sustainability like regulatory requirements and public pressure. It outlines Canada's regulatory status around greenhouse gas emissions, which is inconsistent across provinces. It discusses guidance documents for sustainability planning and reporting. It explains the five milestones for climate change protection established by Partners for Climate Protection: creating an emissions inventory, setting reduction targets, developing an action plan, implementing the plan, and monitoring progress. Key performance indicators for sustainability are also reviewed. The importance of achieving stakeholder support is emphasized through communication and consensus building.
The document summarizes key points about implementing a new Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement between the US and Canada. It discusses the vision of a healthy Great Lakes that benefits both current and future generations. It also outlines several approaches the agreement takes, such as the "polluter pays" principle. Specific annexes on issues like chemicals, nutrients, invasive species, and climate change are also summarized. The role of science, monitoring, and domestic policy priorities to achieve the agreement's goals are discussed.
The document summarizes discussions from the Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2019 on various topics related to chemicals safety. The forum brought together 191 delegates from 31 countries to discuss five main themes: 1) Choosing the best options to manage risks from substances of very high concern, 2) Approaches to plastic circularity, 3) The struggle between data access and protection of intellectual property, 4) Grouping of chemical substances to avoid regrettable substitution, and 5) Measuring the performance of different chemical management systems. Panel discussions covered issues such as predictability and transparency in risk management, promoting substitution of hazardous chemicals, ensuring recycled goods do not reintroduce hazardous substances, and challenges in measuring the impacts of chemicals regulations.
The document summarizes the European Union's efforts towards establishing a circular economy for chemicals. Some key points:
- The EU has implemented 54 actions through its Circular Economy Action Plan to close material cycles and reduce waste. This is estimated to create jobs and reduce CO2 emissions by up to 4%.
- Specific achievements include the EU Plastics Strategy, revisions to waste legislation, and analysis of the interface between chemicals, product, and waste policies.
- The chemical sector is seen as key to enabling circular economy innovations like better design for recycling and chemical recycling technologies.
- REACH legislation has created a large database of chemical information, promoted alternatives to animal testing, and ensured a functioning single market while
The document summarizes the mission and goals of the End Plastic Waste organization, which aims to minimize plastic waste ending up in the environment through developing and scaling solutions for reuse, recovery, and recycling of plastic. It outlines the challenges of increasing plastic waste production and leakage into oceans. The organization takes a collaborative approach across the plastic value chain and promotes complementary solutions like increasing recycling infrastructure/rates, engaging stakeholders, advancing technologies, and cleaning up concentrated plastic waste areas. Its strategy involves innovation, education, infrastructure development, and funding of $1.5 billion over 5 years from member companies for waste management programs and investments.
The document summarizes the European Chemicals Agency's proposal to restrict intentionally added microplastics in professional and consumer uses. The proposed restriction would prohibit the placing on the market of products containing microplastics, with some derogated uses allowed. It would also mandate improved instructions for proper use and disposal to avoid releases into the environment, as well as reporting. A public consultation on the proposal is open until September 2019.
The document discusses grouping of chemical substances and the issue of regrettable substitution. It notes that grouping enables extrapolation of hazard properties from data-rich to data-poor substances and can help address the data deficit problem. However, there is a risk of regrettable substitution, where an unsafe substance is replaced by another unsafe substance. The document then provides an example of an expert committee recommending grouping to some extent for the assessment of organohalogen flame retardants into 16 groups, as individual assessments of each chemical would be unrealistic. It raises questions about ensuring consistent global approaches to grouping while addressing legislative and chemical diversity, and how risk assessors should define groups.
Cefic represents the chemical industry in Europe, with over 500 company members. It interacts daily with EU and international institutions on behalf of its members. The chemical industry invests 700 billion euros annually in R&D to develop new chemicals that improve performance, meet regulations, and anticipate customer needs. Substitution of chemicals is an innovation opportunity that requires a holistic assessment of technical performance, safety, and environmental properties to avoid regrettable substitution. Grouping chemicals can be useful for regulatory assessments if based on robust scientific criteria, but a one-size-fits-all approach should not be used, as substances within a group can have different hazard properties. The only way forward is through dialogue and cooperation between regulators and industry.
The document discusses challenges with accessing chemical data for regulatory purposes and proposes potential solutions. It notes that generating data is costly but necessary to gain market access, and that data sharing is difficult due to regional restrictions and ownership issues. It proposes creating a centralized global database where studies could be purchased via subscription. This would facilitate consistent data access and interpretation across regulatory agencies. Ensuring high quality, compliant data remains challenging due to subjectivity, but the goal of safety and a viable industry requires improved data sharing and alternative assessment methods.
Mike Rasenberg discussed the quality and access to chemical data collected under REACH and CLP regulations. Over 22,000 substances and 148,000 notifications have provided 4.5 million webpages of substance information. IUCLID format standardizes the data and maximizes sharing. While lack of compliance is an issue, other challenges include the data volume, requirement complexity, and balancing data protection and access. ECHA focuses on basic data access through their website and search tools, and plans to further streamline access through pilots with other agencies and transforming data to develop alternatives to animal testing. Global data sharing is expected to increase through IUCLID harmonization, though quality remains a challenge as well as fully accessing the knowledge potential in
Karel De Schamphelaere, a professor at Ghent University and president of SETAC Europe, argues that all raw ecotoxicity data should be fully accessible and reusable in data repositories regardless of origin. This would increase transparency and credibility, allow for evidence-based risk assessment including data quality assessment, and maximize reusability and opportunities for innovation in risk assessment. Currently, important information like full concentration-response data and control performance is often lost when published, limiting reusability and quality assessment. Making all underlying data openly available would help address this "information loss issue."
The document discusses Argentina's Directorate of Chemicals and its approach to chemicals management. It engages stakeholders from government, private sector, civil society, and academia. It uses tools from the OECD and studies the EU regulatory system to develop Argentina's legal framework. Key activities include cleaner production, risk management of substances, contaminated site remediation, and reporting. Challenges include availability of initial information, prioritizing differences, flexibility of tools, and inability to exactly replicate other systems.
1. Guy Thiran gave a speech about metals and the challenges facing their safe use and demand over time. He outlined 4 pillars needed to properly manage risks: having robust data, understanding use and value chains, exposure levels, and considering costs and benefits.
2. Metals demand is forecast to greatly increase due to renewable technologies, while Europe relies on imports as mining makes up less than 2% of production. Recycling rates vary but are improving, though data and access to resources is still challenging.
3. Trade-offs are needed between decarbonization, circularity, toxicity reduction, and sourcing to balance goals over the next 30 years, requiring integration across policies and materials. Exposure management
This document discusses plastics and circularity from a panel at the Helsinki Chemicals Forum. It emphasizes that plastic pollution begins before plastics enter the oceans and promotes preventing plastic waste by prioritizing reduced plastic production and consumption through eco-design within a circular economy approach for non-packaging plastics. The document provides contact information for Justine Maillot from Zero Waste Europe to learn more.
The document discusses marine litter and microplastics from the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment. It was presented at the Helsinki Chemicals Forum on May 24, 2019 by Ingeborg Mork-Knutsen. Photos were provided by Bo Eide.
This document discusses a company that produces products made from recycled or renewable fibers that are recyclable or biodegradable, aiming to reach 100% circular products by 2022. It takes a holistic perspective in designing its value chain to take full responsibility socially, ethically, and environmentally. The company sees regenerative technologies that work in partnership with nature as an opportunity to shift from exploitation to regeneration as the standard.
The document discusses measuring the performance of the EU chemicals acquis. It assessed effectiveness, efficiency, coherence, relevance, and EU added value. The assessment involved scientific evidence, citizens, stakeholders, and experts from several EU commission services and agencies. Challenges included assessing a broad framework with no baseline, data gaps, attribution issues, and diverging views. Next steps include collecting more data, evidence, and stakeholder input to conduct additional research and develop better indicators for assessing specific legislation.
This document discusses the grouping of chemical substances for regulatory purposes and how to avoid unintended consequences when substituting chemicals. It addresses how chemicals are grouped for restrictions, classifications, and authorizations under REACH. The challenges of grouping chemicals when there is uncertainty about their properties is discussed. Read-across, which is using data from one chemical to predict the properties of another, is examined, including the criteria used to evaluate it. Ensuring there is sufficient data and scientific justification for groupings and read-across is important to support informed substitution of chemicals.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Juraj Čorba, Chair of OECD Working Party on Artificial Intelligence Governance (AIGO), was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Nathaniel Lane, Associate Professor in Economics at Oxford University, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the 77th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Professor Alex Robson, Deputy Chair of Australia’s Productivity Commission, was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the 77th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Mastering the Concepts Tested in the Databricks Certified Data Engineer Assoc...SkillCertProExams
• For a full set of 760+ questions. Go to
https://skillcertpro.com/product/databricks-certified-data-engineer-associate-exam-questions/
• SkillCertPro offers detailed explanations to each question which helps to understand the concepts better.
• It is recommended to score above 85% in SkillCertPro exams before attempting a real exam.
• SkillCertPro updates exam questions every 2 weeks.
• You will get life time access and life time free updates
• SkillCertPro assures 100% pass guarantee in first attempt.
This presentation by OECD, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Pro-competitive Industrial Policy” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/pcip.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Carrer goals.pptx and their importance in real lifeartemacademy2
Career goals serve as a roadmap for individuals, guiding them toward achieving long-term professional aspirations and personal fulfillment. Establishing clear career goals enables professionals to focus their efforts on developing specific skills, gaining relevant experience, and making strategic decisions that align with their desired career trajectory. By setting both short-term and long-term objectives, individuals can systematically track their progress, make necessary adjustments, and stay motivated. Short-term goals often include acquiring new qualifications, mastering particular competencies, or securing a specific role, while long-term goals might encompass reaching executive positions, becoming industry experts, or launching entrepreneurial ventures.
Moreover, having well-defined career goals fosters a sense of purpose and direction, enhancing job satisfaction and overall productivity. It encourages continuous learning and adaptation, as professionals remain attuned to industry trends and evolving job market demands. Career goals also facilitate better time management and resource allocation, as individuals prioritize tasks and opportunities that advance their professional growth. In addition, articulating career goals can aid in networking and mentorship, as it allows individuals to communicate their aspirations clearly to potential mentors, colleagues, and employers, thereby opening doors to valuable guidance and support. Ultimately, career goals are integral to personal and professional development, driving individuals toward sustained success and fulfillment in their chosen fields.
This presentation by Yong Lim, Professor of Economic Law at Seoul National University School of Law, was made during the discussion “Artificial Intelligence, Data and Competition” held at the 143rd meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 12 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/aicomp.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity • a micro report by Rosie WellsRosie Wells
Insight: In a landscape where traditional narrative structures are giving way to fragmented and non-linear forms of storytelling, there lies immense potential for creativity and exploration.
'Collapsing Narratives: Exploring Non-Linearity' is a micro report from Rosie Wells.
Rosie Wells is an Arts & Cultural Strategist uniquely positioned at the intersection of grassroots and mainstream storytelling.
Their work is focused on developing meaningful and lasting connections that can drive social change.
Please download this presentation to enjoy the hyperlinks!
XP 2024 presentation: A New Look to Leadershipsamililja
Presentation slides from XP2024 conference, Bolzano IT. The slides describe a new view to leadership and combines it with anthro-complexity (aka cynefin).
1. Presenter Name - Title
Canada’s Chemicals Management Plan:
“A decade after implementation”
PANEL 1: What has chemicals legislation
done for us over the last decade?
June 8th, 2017
2. • Pre-existing, established, scientifically sound, chemicals management
program for new and existing chemicals
• Relatively new Legislative mandate
– The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA, 1999)
• Categorization/Prioritization of Domestic Substances List (23,000 substances)
• Requirements to conduct screening assessment
• Evolving National/Regional Chemicals Programs International
– REACH was being born in Europe
– Reforms underway in the United States
• New Government
– Prime Minister launched Chemicals Management Plan in December 2006
– Support and Resources ($)
• Timing / Alignment
– Baseline of information following prioritization exercise
2
Key Drivers and Landscape in 2006
5. 5
Chemicals Management Cycle under CEPA
Stakeholder
Engagement/Outreach,
Information Gathering,
Reporting, Cooperation
and Collaboration
6. Canada’s Chemicals Management Plan (CMP)
• Protection of human health and the environment
• The CMP provides a plan for the assessment and management of ~4,300
substances that were identified as priorities, and is Canada’s approach to
achieve the international goal for the sound management of chemicals by
2020
• The CMP is comprised of three phases
• The most recent phase was launched in May 2016 and builds on the successes of
the first 2 phases
6
Phase 3:
2016-2020;
1500
Phase 2:
2011-2016;
1700
Phase 1:
2006-2011;
1065
7. Key Principles of the CMP
7
An integrated, government-wide approach to chemicals management to
protect Human Health and the Environment
Targeted action on chemicals of higher concern
Transparent, predictable timelines
Integration of research and monitoring programs, aligned to priorities
A basis to promote international collaboration
Enhanced engagement with various groups
8. • Systematic, practical, pragmatic approach,
• Achieving results!
• ~2800 assessments completed,
• ~370 substances found harmful, ~80 risk management actions
• Integration across the Federal Government
• Focused on priorities, alignment
• Public timelines and Transparency
• Stakeholder Engagement
• Working Internationally – Scavenging?
8
Lessons Learned, Successes of CMP after a Decade
9. • What’s on the horizon…….
– Review of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 is underway
– Continued delivery and implementation of the CMP
– Early thinking has begun on future direction of chemicals management
post-2020
• What has the CMP accomplished?
• What are the gaps?
• Where should we go?
– Stakeholders have started to be engaged early in the process
– Chemicals management beyond 2020 is also being discussed internationally
• Canada recently Co-Chaired the first meeting of the intersessional process
considering the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management
(SAICM) and the sound management of chemicals and waste beyond 2020
9
Now beginning to look beyond 2020
10. Evolution of Chemicals Management in Canada
Canadian Environmental
Protection Act (CEPA)
1988 proclaimed
First Priority Substances List
(PSL1): created 1989
Domestic Substances List
(DSL): created 1991
Second Priority Substances List
(PSL 2): created 1995
New Substances Regulations for
Chemicals & Polymers - 1994
New Substances Regulations for
Organisms - 1997
Canadian Environmental Protection
Act (CEPA) 1999 enacted
Categorization (2000 – 2006)
Chemicals Management Plan 1 - 2006
Chemicals Management Plan 2 - 2011
Chemicals Management Plan 3 - 2016
Post 2020
Chemicals
Program
Environmental Contaminants Act of 1975
WE ARE HERE
10
Sound Management of Chemicals
2020 Goals