Ionizing radiation...Effects
and Safety
Dr/Ahmed Bahnassy
Consultant radiologist
Alexandria Urology Hospital
what every health worker must know
Alexandria Urology
Hospital AUH
Aims of lecture
 To become familiar
with the mechanisms
& biological effects
following exposure to
ionizing radiation.
 To be aware of the
risks of ionizing
radiation .
 To know main safety
issues of protection.
RADIATION:-
Radiation is the energy that comes from a source and
travels through some material or space as waves or
photons.
IONIZING RATIATION:-
This kind of radiation on interaction with matter produce
charged particles called ions.
This type of radiation has enough energy to break
chemical bonds.
NON-IONIZING RATIATION:-
Radiation that does not have enough energy to break
chemical bonds but can vibrate atom. It cannot produce
ions.
SOURCES OF RADIATION
UNITS OF RADIATION:-
1)Roentgen (R):- Radiaton exposure in a volume of air.
2) Rad:-
It is the unit of absorbed dose.
The SI unit of absorbed dose is Gray (Gy)
1 Gy=100 rad
3) Rem:-
It is the unit of effective dose.
Used only in radiation protection.
The SI unit is Sievert
1 Sv= 100 rem
1 mSv = 0.001 Sv.
0.01 mSv
0.5 Chest
X-ray.
0.02mSv
1 CXR
0.07 mSv
3.5 CXR
1.3mSv
65 CXR
0.7mSv 1.0mSv 2.5mSv 3.0mSv 7.0mSv
35 CXR 50 CXR 125CXR 150CXR 350CXR
2.3mSv 8.0mSv 10mSv
115 Chest 400 CXR 500 CXR
X-rays.
15 mSv
750 CXR
4 mSv
200 CXR
6 mSv
300 CXR
THYROID SCAN RENAL SCAN LUNG PERFUSION
1.0 mSv 1.0 mSv 1.0 mSv
50 CXR 50 CXR 50 CXR
BONE SCAN PET HEAD (FDG) CARDIAC GATED
4.0 mSv 5.0 mSv 6.0 mSv
200 CXR 250 CXR 300 CXR
Ionizing Radiation..How
effects are produced
Ionizing Radiation is the
removal of an electron
from an atom leaving an
unstable molecule which
may then break apart to
form free radicals.
http://www.paradigmlink.com/ionrad.shtml
The weapon
Linear Energy Transfer (LET)
The average energy deposited per unit
length of track.
Measured in kiloelectron volts per micron
(10-6 m)
Low LET / High LET
 Low LET
Low mass, increased
travel distance (gamma rays, x-
rays).
Sparsely ionizing with
random interactions.
Causes damage primarily
through indirect action or
may cause single strand
breaks (which are repairable).
http://staff.jccc.net/PDECELL/biochemistry/dna.gif
e-
Low LET / High LET
High LET
– Large mass, decreased tr
avel distance (alpha parti
cles, protons, low energy
neutrons).
– Causes dense ionization
along its path with a high
probability of interacting
directly with DNA.
http://staff.jccc.net/PDECELL/biochemistry/dna.gif
α++
Ionizing Radiation
The reactions caused by ionizing radiation
occur rapidly, they are nonselective and
random.
The majority of damage caused by
radiation is due to chemical reactions with
water within the cell.
The injury mechanism
H2O
HOH+
H+
OH*
H* OH-
e- + H2O HOH-
water
negatively charged
water molecule
Hydrogen
ion
Hydroxyl
radical
electron water
Positively charged
water molecule
hydrogen
radical
Hydroxyl
ion
The negatively charged
water molecule
dissociates into a
hydrogen radical and a
hydroxyl ion.
Reactions
The previous reactions produce free
electrons (e-), the ions H- and OH-,
the free radicals H* and OH*.
The fate of these products are…….
Free Radicals
A free radical is an atom or
molecule that has an unpaired
electron in its valence shell.
These free radicals are
non-selective when pairing up
with electrons from other
atoms, including those that
make up the DNA molecule.
Direct Action / Indirect Action
Direct Action
Causes damage directly to DNA or other important
molecules in the cell.
More likely when the beam of charged particles
consist of alpha particles, protons, or electrons
Indirect Action
Causes damage by interacting with the cellular
medium producing free radicals which then damage
the DNA molecule.
More likely when x-rays or gamma-rays compose the
beam.
Direct Action / Indirect Action
DNA Damage
 The arrangement of nitrogenous bases
provide a blueprint for DNA for the synthesis
of specific proteins necessary for individual
cell function.
 In the event of a loss or change of one or
more of the nitrogenous bases....base
sequence and normal functioning of the cell
is altered.
 Another form of DNA damage due to
radiation involves a break in the hydrogen
bonds between the Adenine – Thymine and
Cytosine – Guanine base pairs. These bonds
function to keep the DNA strands together
 Bonds can also break between deoxyribose
sugar and the phosphate groups which can
lead to cross-linking of DNA
The target
Chromosome Aberrations
 If the chromosome fragments are
near one another they have a high
chance of reattaching in their
original position – causing no future
damage to the cell.A process known
as restitution.
 In translocations and inversions, no
genetic information is lost, but the
rearrangement of gene sequence
will alter protein synthesis.
 In a deletion, a chromosome
fragment is not replicated during the
next mitosis, the genetic information
is lost. The effects this has on the
cell depends on the amount and
type of information lost.
Translocation
Inversion
Deletion
The effects
Chromosome deletion
Chromosome translocation
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation
Outcomes after cell exposure
DAMAGE
REPAIRED
CELL DEATH
(APOPTOSIS)
TRANSFORMED
CELL
DAMAGE TO DNA
IAEA
International Atomic Energy Agency
DNA Mutation
Cell survives
but mutated
Cancer ?
Cell death
Mutation
repaired
Unviable Cell
Viable Cell
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation
Repair of DNA damage
• RADIOBIOLOGISTS
ASSUME THAT THE
REPAIR SYSTEM IS
NOT 100%
EFFECTIVE.
Cancer initiation
IAEA
NORMAL TISSUE
IAEA
CELL INITIATION
An initiating event
creates a mutation in
one of the basal cells
IAEA
DYSPLASIA
More mutations occurred.
The initiated cell has
gained proliferative
advantages.
Rapidly dividing cells
begin to accumulate
within the epithelium.
IAEA
BENIGN TUMOR
More changes within
the proliferative cell line lead
to full tumor development.
IAEA
MALIGNANT TUMOR
The tumor breaks trough
the basal lamina.
The cells are irregularly
shaped and the cell line is
immortal. They have an increased
mobility and invasiveness.
IAEA
METASTASIS
Cancer cells break through
the wall of a lymphatic
vessel or blood capillary.
They can now migrate
throughout the body and
potentially seed new tumors.
IAEA
A simple generalized scheme for multistage oncogenesis
Damage to chromosomal DNA
of a normal target cell
Failure to correct
DNA repair
Appearance of specific
neoplasia-initiating mutation
Promotional growth
of pre-neoplasm
Conversion to overtly
malignant phenotype
Malignant progression
and tumour spread
Radiosensitivity
Actively reproducing cells are more
radiosensitive than mature cells.
During mitosis, the cell is in a stressed
state and shows an increase in damage
caused by radiation.
Cells that have decreased levels of
differentiation are more radiosensitive
than specialized cells.
The Cell Cycle
 An ordered set of events,
culminating in cell growth and
division into two daughter
cells
 Tc, full mitotic cycle
G2
(2nd gap)
M
(mitosis)
S
(DNA Synthesis phase)
G1
(1st gap)
Cells that
cease
division
Radiosensitivity & Mitotic Cycle
 Cell cycle components
 M, G1, S, G2
 Cell cycles times vary largely due to G1
 crypt cells, 9 - 10 hours
 stem cells (mouse skin) 200 hr
 Sensitivity
 Cells most sensitive close to mitosis
 Resistance greatest in latter part of S
 For long G1’s, there is an early resistance period followed by
sensitive one at the end of G1
 G2 ~ M in sensitivity
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation
Radiosensitivity
Muscle
Bones
Nervous
system
Skin
Mesoderm
organs (liver,
heart, lungs…)
Bone Marrow
Spleen
Thymus
Lymphatic
nodes
Gonads
Eye lens
Lymphocytes
(exception to the RS laws)
Low RSMedium RSHigh RS
Fractionation in radiotherapy
 Instead of a single treatment
consisting of a high dose, frac
tionation divides the dose to be de
livered over a period of time, usua
lly 6-8 weeks.
 At low doses of radiation,
normal cells have an increased sur
vival rate because of their ability
to repair sublethal damage before
the next fraction of radiation is
delivered.
 Tumor cells do not possess the
repair enzymes necessary to
keep up with the repairs and
as a result the cell is
overwhelmed and is destroyed.
http://www.usoncology.com/CompanyInfo/PhotoLibrary.asp
 Two effects of radiation
exposure:
 deterministic (threshold)
 stochastic: cancer
 Radiation Standards
 set below threshold
 set to limit stochastic risk
Dose-Response Relationships
Non-Stochastic (Deterministic) Effects
 Occurs above threshold
dose
 Severity increases with
dose
 Alopecia (hair loss)
 Cataracts
 Erythema (skin reddening)
 Radiation Sickness
 Temporary Sterility
Stochastic (Probabilistic) Effects
 Occurs by chance
 Probability increases with dose
 Carcinogenesis
 Mutagenesis
 Teratogenesis
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation
Radiation health effects
DETERMINISTIC
Somatic
Clinically attributable
in the exposed
individual
CELL DEATH
STOCHASTIC
somatic & hereditary
epidemiologically
attributable in large
populations
ANTENATAL
somatic and
hereditary expressed
in the foetus, in the live
born or descendants
BOTH
TYPE
OF
EFFECTS
CELL TRANSFORMATION
Radiation effects and
Syndromes
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation
Injury
Threshold
Dose to
Skin (Sv)
Weeks to
Onset
Early transient erythema 2 <<1
Temporary epilation 3 3
Main erythema 6 1.5
Permanent epilation 7 3
Dry desquamation 10 4
Invasive fibrosis 10
Dermal atrophy 11 >14
Telangiectasis 12 >52
Moist desquamation 15 4
Late erythema 15 6-10
Dermal necrosis 18 >10
Secondary ulceration 20 >6
Skin damage
from prolonged
fluoroscopic
exposure
Skin reactions
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation
Skin injuries
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation
Effects in eye
• Eye lens is highly RS.
• Coagulation of proteins
occur with doses
greater than 2 Gy.
• There are 2 basic
effects:
From “Atlas de Histologia...”. J. Boya
Histologic view of eye:
Eye lens is highly RS,
moreover, it is surrounded by
highly RS cuboid cells.
> 0.155.0
Visual
impairment
(cataract)
> 0.10.5-2.0Detectable
opacities
Sv/year for
many years
Sv single brief
exposure
Effect
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation 49
Whole body response: adult
Acute irradiation
syndrome Chronic irradiation
syndrome
Dose
Steps:
1. Prodromic
(onset of
disease)
2. Latency
3. Manifestation
Lethal dose 50 / 30
BONE
MARROW GASTRO
INTESTINAL
CNS
(central nervous
system)
1-10 Gy
10 - 50 Gy
> 50 Gy
•Mechanism:
Neurovegetative
disorder
•Similar to a sick
feeling
•Quite frequent in
fractionated
radiotherapy
Threshold Doses for Deterministic
Effects
• Cataracts of the lens of the
eye 2-10 Gy
• Permanent sterility
• males 3.5-6 Gy
• females 2.5-6 Gy
• Temporary sterility
• males 0.15 Gy
• females 0.6 Gy
Severity of
effect
dose
threshold
Symptoms of Acute Radiation Sickness
 Three categories (E. Hall, 1994)
 Hemopoietic: 3-8 Gy LD50/60
 radiation damages precursors to red/white blood cells &
platelets
 prodromal may occur immediately
 symptoms: septicemia,
 survival mixed
 examples include Chernobyl personnel (203 exhibited
symptoms, 13 died)
Symptoms, continued
 Gastrointestinal : >10 Gy
 radiation depopulates GI epithelium (crypt cells)
 abdominal pain/fever, diarrhea, dehydration
 death 3 to 10 days (no record of human survivors above 10
Gy)
 examples include Chernobyl firefighters
 Cerebrovascular : > 100 Gy
 death in minutes to hours
Delayed Effects
 SOMATIC: they affect the health of
the irradiated person. They are
mainly different kinds of cancer
(leukemia is the most common, with
a delay period of 2-5 years, but also
colon, lung, stomach cancer…)
 GENETIC: they affect the health of
the offspring of the irradiated person.
They are mutations that cause
malformation of any kind (such as
mongolism)
RADIATION PROTECTION
Based on two components.
A) JUSTIFICATION.
B) OPTIMIZATION.
JUSTIFICATION:-
Applications of ionising radiation are only justified
when they provide a net benefit with minimization of
risks of radiation for people.
GUIDELINES FOR REFERRING PHYSICIANS:-
1) Repeating investigations which have already been
done:
For example at other hospital, in an outpatient department,
or in an accident and emergency department.
HAS IT BEEN DONE ALREADY? Every attempt should be made
to get previous films.
2) Investigation when results are unlikely to affect
patient management:
The anticipated 'positive' finding is usually irrelevant, e.g.
degenerative spinal disease (as 'normal' as white hairs in old
age) or because a positive finding is so unlikely. DO I NEED IT?
3) Investigating too often:-
i.e. before the disease could have progressed or resolved or
before the results could influence treatment. DO I NEED IT
NOW? Or some clinicians tend to rely on investigations more
than others. ARE TOO MANY INVESTIGATIONS BEING
PERFORMED?
4) Doing the wrong investigation:-
Imaging techniques are developing rapidly. It is often helpful to
discuss an investigation with a specialist in clinical radiology or
nuclear medicine before it is requested. IS THIS THE BEST
INVESTIGATION?
5) Failing to provide appropriate clinical information &
questions that imaging Investigation should answer.
Deficiencies here may lead to the wrong technique being used
(e.g. the omission of an essential view). HAVE I EXPLAINED THE
PROBLEM?
OPTIMIZATION:-
Once a practice is
justified, the exposure to
ionising radiation should
be kept as low as
reasonably achievable
(ALARA).
FUNDAMENTAL
PRINCIPLES OF
RADIATION
PROTECTION:
1. Distance.
2. Exposure time.
3. Barriers & Shielding.
DISTANCE
INVERSE SQUARE LAW:
Intensity of radiation is inversely proportional to
the square of the distance from the source of radiation.
In equation form:
For Example: If the
dose is 9 R at 3
feet, stepping back
to a distance of
6 feet will cause
the dose to
decrease to 2.25 R.
57cm from x-ray source 50cm from x-ray source
EXPOSURE TIME
 The amount of radiation received is proportional to
the length of the exposure time.
 Minimized by conducting
procedures as quickly as possible.
 For Example, using short
bursts of fluoroscopy.
Employing image intensifiers &
Intensifying screens.
Using high kVp , low maS
techniques.
BARRIERS & SHIELDING
 The most commonly used protective material is lead. It
has a double advantage of high density and high
atomic number.
 Lead equivalent: it is the thickness of lead which
provide the same degree of protection as the material.
ROOM SHIELDING:
 Should be located as far as away from areas of high
occupancy and general traffic.
 Wall on which primary beam falls should not be less
than 35 cm thick brick or equivalent.
 Shielding of 1.7mm lead (23 cm brick) in front of doors
& windows of x-ray room.
X-RAY CONTROL
ROOM:
Walls & viewing
windows of control
booth should have lead
equivalent of 1.5 mm.
Distance between
control panel & X-ray
unit / chest
stand should be
minimum 3 meters.
PATIENT WAITING ROOM:
 Provided outside X-ray room a proper warning signal
when unit is in use.
 Warning devices may include audible and visual
signs.
LEAD APRON:-
 Typically thickness of 0.5
mm lead equivalent is
used.
 Weight ranges from 2.5 to
7 kg.
 Should cover much of red
bone marrow & breast.
LEAD GLOVES:
 Lead salts or metallic lead
are added to rubber or
plastic.
 Lead equivalent of these
is about ¼ mm.
LEAD GLASS:
 Made by adding lead salts to silicates , in the
manufacturing of glass.
 It is acceptably transparent and a better protective
material.
 Contains 60% of lead by weight.
GONADAL SHIELDING:
 Must be 0.5 mm of lead.
 Must be used when gonads will lie within 5 cm of the
collimated area.
 Separate male vs. female shielding available.
LEAD GLOVES
LEAD GLASSES
THYROID COLLER
OVARIAN PROTECTION
MALE GONADAL
SHIELD
 Have standard projections for specific indications.
 Additional views - on a case-by-case basis
 Use PA projections, where practical, for chest and spine
radiographs.
 Avoid repeating exposures.
 Use safe exposure factors – high KVp and low mAs
technique.
Never stand in the primary beam.
Always wear protective apparel when not behind a
protective barrier.
Always wear a radiation monitor and position it outside the
protective apron at collar level.
The person holding the patient must wear protective apron
and if possible gloves.
Always collimate to smallest field size appropriate to
examination.
RADIATION MONITORING DEVICES
Non-Self Reading Devices:
1) FILM BADGES:
 Consist of a small dental–sized film wrapped in light proof
paper and mounted in a holder filled with metallic filters of
different thicknesses.
2) THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS (TLD):
 They are used to measure external
individual whole body doses from
X-rays , beta rays & gamma radiation.
 It consists of a TLD card loaded in a
cassette (card holder ) having suitable
metallic & plastic filters.
TLD Ring or Finger badges:
 Ring or finger badges are worn by fluoroscopists &
interventional radiologists who usually receive high
doses to their extremities.
 The ring dosimeter contains a small radiation-sensitive
lithium fluoride crystal.
SELF READING DEVICES:
Real time dose information available
Needs frequent Calibration checks
Can be taken from hospital to hospital.
Good for visiting consultants
surgeons, anesthetists,
urologists, gastroenterologists
etc.
Summary
 Ionizing radiation use should be only used
when benefit outweighs possible risks.
 Every examination should be justified.
 Optimized protocols for lowering patient dose
without affecting accurate diagnosis should
be done.
 Use all kinds of radiation protection during
work...It's your life.!
IAEA 3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation 75
Where to Get More Information (1)
• The 2007 Recommendations of the International
Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP 103,
Annals of the ICRP 37(2-4):1-332 (2007)
• UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly,
with scientific annexes, United Nations Scientific
Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation,
United Nations, Vienna, Austria, 2008
• Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical
interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85.
Ann ICRP 2000;30 (2). Elsevier
Ionizing radiation protection

Ionizing radiation protection

  • 1.
    Ionizing radiation...Effects and Safety Dr/AhmedBahnassy Consultant radiologist Alexandria Urology Hospital what every health worker must know Alexandria Urology Hospital AUH
  • 3.
    Aims of lecture To become familiar with the mechanisms & biological effects following exposure to ionizing radiation.  To be aware of the risks of ionizing radiation .  To know main safety issues of protection.
  • 4.
    RADIATION:- Radiation is theenergy that comes from a source and travels through some material or space as waves or photons. IONIZING RATIATION:- This kind of radiation on interaction with matter produce charged particles called ions. This type of radiation has enough energy to break chemical bonds. NON-IONIZING RATIATION:- Radiation that does not have enough energy to break chemical bonds but can vibrate atom. It cannot produce ions.
  • 5.
  • 7.
    UNITS OF RADIATION:- 1)Roentgen(R):- Radiaton exposure in a volume of air. 2) Rad:- It is the unit of absorbed dose. The SI unit of absorbed dose is Gray (Gy) 1 Gy=100 rad 3) Rem:- It is the unit of effective dose. Used only in radiation protection. The SI unit is Sievert 1 Sv= 100 rem 1 mSv = 0.001 Sv.
  • 8.
    0.01 mSv 0.5 Chest X-ray. 0.02mSv 1CXR 0.07 mSv 3.5 CXR 1.3mSv 65 CXR 0.7mSv 1.0mSv 2.5mSv 3.0mSv 7.0mSv 35 CXR 50 CXR 125CXR 150CXR 350CXR
  • 9.
    2.3mSv 8.0mSv 10mSv 115Chest 400 CXR 500 CXR X-rays.
  • 10.
    15 mSv 750 CXR 4mSv 200 CXR 6 mSv 300 CXR
  • 11.
    THYROID SCAN RENALSCAN LUNG PERFUSION 1.0 mSv 1.0 mSv 1.0 mSv 50 CXR 50 CXR 50 CXR BONE SCAN PET HEAD (FDG) CARDIAC GATED 4.0 mSv 5.0 mSv 6.0 mSv 200 CXR 250 CXR 300 CXR
  • 12.
    Ionizing Radiation..How effects areproduced Ionizing Radiation is the removal of an electron from an atom leaving an unstable molecule which may then break apart to form free radicals. http://www.paradigmlink.com/ionrad.shtml The weapon
  • 13.
    Linear Energy Transfer(LET) The average energy deposited per unit length of track. Measured in kiloelectron volts per micron (10-6 m)
  • 14.
    Low LET /High LET  Low LET Low mass, increased travel distance (gamma rays, x- rays). Sparsely ionizing with random interactions. Causes damage primarily through indirect action or may cause single strand breaks (which are repairable). http://staff.jccc.net/PDECELL/biochemistry/dna.gif e-
  • 15.
    Low LET /High LET High LET – Large mass, decreased tr avel distance (alpha parti cles, protons, low energy neutrons). – Causes dense ionization along its path with a high probability of interacting directly with DNA. http://staff.jccc.net/PDECELL/biochemistry/dna.gif α++
  • 16.
    Ionizing Radiation The reactionscaused by ionizing radiation occur rapidly, they are nonselective and random. The majority of damage caused by radiation is due to chemical reactions with water within the cell. The injury mechanism
  • 17.
    H2O HOH+ H+ OH* H* OH- e- +H2O HOH- water negatively charged water molecule Hydrogen ion Hydroxyl radical electron water Positively charged water molecule hydrogen radical Hydroxyl ion The negatively charged water molecule dissociates into a hydrogen radical and a hydroxyl ion.
  • 18.
    Reactions The previous reactionsproduce free electrons (e-), the ions H- and OH-, the free radicals H* and OH*. The fate of these products are…….
  • 19.
    Free Radicals A freeradical is an atom or molecule that has an unpaired electron in its valence shell. These free radicals are non-selective when pairing up with electrons from other atoms, including those that make up the DNA molecule.
  • 20.
    Direct Action /Indirect Action Direct Action Causes damage directly to DNA or other important molecules in the cell. More likely when the beam of charged particles consist of alpha particles, protons, or electrons Indirect Action Causes damage by interacting with the cellular medium producing free radicals which then damage the DNA molecule. More likely when x-rays or gamma-rays compose the beam.
  • 21.
    Direct Action /Indirect Action
  • 22.
    DNA Damage  Thearrangement of nitrogenous bases provide a blueprint for DNA for the synthesis of specific proteins necessary for individual cell function.  In the event of a loss or change of one or more of the nitrogenous bases....base sequence and normal functioning of the cell is altered.  Another form of DNA damage due to radiation involves a break in the hydrogen bonds between the Adenine – Thymine and Cytosine – Guanine base pairs. These bonds function to keep the DNA strands together  Bonds can also break between deoxyribose sugar and the phosphate groups which can lead to cross-linking of DNA The target
  • 23.
    Chromosome Aberrations  Ifthe chromosome fragments are near one another they have a high chance of reattaching in their original position – causing no future damage to the cell.A process known as restitution.  In translocations and inversions, no genetic information is lost, but the rearrangement of gene sequence will alter protein synthesis.  In a deletion, a chromosome fragment is not replicated during the next mitosis, the genetic information is lost. The effects this has on the cell depends on the amount and type of information lost. Translocation Inversion Deletion The effects
  • 24.
  • 25.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation Outcomes after cell exposure DAMAGE REPAIRED CELL DEATH (APOPTOSIS) TRANSFORMED CELL DAMAGE TO DNA
  • 26.
    IAEA International Atomic EnergyAgency DNA Mutation Cell survives but mutated Cancer ? Cell death Mutation repaired Unviable Cell Viable Cell
  • 27.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation Repair of DNA damage • RADIOBIOLOGISTS ASSUME THAT THE REPAIR SYSTEM IS NOT 100% EFFECTIVE.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
    IAEA CELL INITIATION An initiatingevent creates a mutation in one of the basal cells
  • 31.
    IAEA DYSPLASIA More mutations occurred. Theinitiated cell has gained proliferative advantages. Rapidly dividing cells begin to accumulate within the epithelium.
  • 32.
    IAEA BENIGN TUMOR More changeswithin the proliferative cell line lead to full tumor development.
  • 33.
    IAEA MALIGNANT TUMOR The tumorbreaks trough the basal lamina. The cells are irregularly shaped and the cell line is immortal. They have an increased mobility and invasiveness.
  • 34.
    IAEA METASTASIS Cancer cells breakthrough the wall of a lymphatic vessel or blood capillary. They can now migrate throughout the body and potentially seed new tumors.
  • 35.
    IAEA A simple generalizedscheme for multistage oncogenesis Damage to chromosomal DNA of a normal target cell Failure to correct DNA repair Appearance of specific neoplasia-initiating mutation Promotional growth of pre-neoplasm Conversion to overtly malignant phenotype Malignant progression and tumour spread
  • 36.
    Radiosensitivity Actively reproducing cellsare more radiosensitive than mature cells. During mitosis, the cell is in a stressed state and shows an increase in damage caused by radiation. Cells that have decreased levels of differentiation are more radiosensitive than specialized cells.
  • 37.
    The Cell Cycle An ordered set of events, culminating in cell growth and division into two daughter cells  Tc, full mitotic cycle G2 (2nd gap) M (mitosis) S (DNA Synthesis phase) G1 (1st gap) Cells that cease division
  • 38.
    Radiosensitivity & MitoticCycle  Cell cycle components  M, G1, S, G2  Cell cycles times vary largely due to G1  crypt cells, 9 - 10 hours  stem cells (mouse skin) 200 hr  Sensitivity  Cells most sensitive close to mitosis  Resistance greatest in latter part of S  For long G1’s, there is an early resistance period followed by sensitive one at the end of G1  G2 ~ M in sensitivity
  • 39.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation Radiosensitivity Muscle Bones Nervous system Skin Mesoderm organs (liver, heart, lungs…) Bone Marrow Spleen Thymus Lymphatic nodes Gonads Eye lens Lymphocytes (exception to the RS laws) Low RSMedium RSHigh RS
  • 40.
    Fractionation in radiotherapy Instead of a single treatment consisting of a high dose, frac tionation divides the dose to be de livered over a period of time, usua lly 6-8 weeks.  At low doses of radiation, normal cells have an increased sur vival rate because of their ability to repair sublethal damage before the next fraction of radiation is delivered.  Tumor cells do not possess the repair enzymes necessary to keep up with the repairs and as a result the cell is overwhelmed and is destroyed. http://www.usoncology.com/CompanyInfo/PhotoLibrary.asp
  • 41.
     Two effectsof radiation exposure:  deterministic (threshold)  stochastic: cancer  Radiation Standards  set below threshold  set to limit stochastic risk Dose-Response Relationships
  • 42.
    Non-Stochastic (Deterministic) Effects Occurs above threshold dose  Severity increases with dose  Alopecia (hair loss)  Cataracts  Erythema (skin reddening)  Radiation Sickness  Temporary Sterility
  • 43.
    Stochastic (Probabilistic) Effects Occurs by chance  Probability increases with dose  Carcinogenesis  Mutagenesis  Teratogenesis
  • 44.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation Radiation health effects DETERMINISTIC Somatic Clinically attributable in the exposed individual CELL DEATH STOCHASTIC somatic & hereditary epidemiologically attributable in large populations ANTENATAL somatic and hereditary expressed in the foetus, in the live born or descendants BOTH TYPE OF EFFECTS CELL TRANSFORMATION
  • 45.
  • 46.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation Injury Threshold Dose to Skin (Sv) Weeks to Onset Early transient erythema 2 <<1 Temporary epilation 3 3 Main erythema 6 1.5 Permanent epilation 7 3 Dry desquamation 10 4 Invasive fibrosis 10 Dermal atrophy 11 >14 Telangiectasis 12 >52 Moist desquamation 15 4 Late erythema 15 6-10 Dermal necrosis 18 >10 Secondary ulceration 20 >6 Skin damage from prolonged fluoroscopic exposure Skin reactions
  • 47.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation Skin injuries
  • 48.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation Effects in eye • Eye lens is highly RS. • Coagulation of proteins occur with doses greater than 2 Gy. • There are 2 basic effects: From “Atlas de Histologia...”. J. Boya Histologic view of eye: Eye lens is highly RS, moreover, it is surrounded by highly RS cuboid cells. > 0.155.0 Visual impairment (cataract) > 0.10.5-2.0Detectable opacities Sv/year for many years Sv single brief exposure Effect
  • 49.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation 49 Whole body response: adult Acute irradiation syndrome Chronic irradiation syndrome Dose Steps: 1. Prodromic (onset of disease) 2. Latency 3. Manifestation Lethal dose 50 / 30 BONE MARROW GASTRO INTESTINAL CNS (central nervous system) 1-10 Gy 10 - 50 Gy > 50 Gy •Mechanism: Neurovegetative disorder •Similar to a sick feeling •Quite frequent in fractionated radiotherapy
  • 50.
    Threshold Doses forDeterministic Effects • Cataracts of the lens of the eye 2-10 Gy • Permanent sterility • males 3.5-6 Gy • females 2.5-6 Gy • Temporary sterility • males 0.15 Gy • females 0.6 Gy Severity of effect dose threshold
  • 51.
    Symptoms of AcuteRadiation Sickness  Three categories (E. Hall, 1994)  Hemopoietic: 3-8 Gy LD50/60  radiation damages precursors to red/white blood cells & platelets  prodromal may occur immediately  symptoms: septicemia,  survival mixed  examples include Chernobyl personnel (203 exhibited symptoms, 13 died)
  • 52.
    Symptoms, continued  Gastrointestinal: >10 Gy  radiation depopulates GI epithelium (crypt cells)  abdominal pain/fever, diarrhea, dehydration  death 3 to 10 days (no record of human survivors above 10 Gy)  examples include Chernobyl firefighters  Cerebrovascular : > 100 Gy  death in minutes to hours
  • 53.
    Delayed Effects  SOMATIC:they affect the health of the irradiated person. They are mainly different kinds of cancer (leukemia is the most common, with a delay period of 2-5 years, but also colon, lung, stomach cancer…)  GENETIC: they affect the health of the offspring of the irradiated person. They are mutations that cause malformation of any kind (such as mongolism)
  • 55.
    RADIATION PROTECTION Based ontwo components. A) JUSTIFICATION. B) OPTIMIZATION. JUSTIFICATION:- Applications of ionising radiation are only justified when they provide a net benefit with minimization of risks of radiation for people.
  • 56.
    GUIDELINES FOR REFERRINGPHYSICIANS:- 1) Repeating investigations which have already been done: For example at other hospital, in an outpatient department, or in an accident and emergency department. HAS IT BEEN DONE ALREADY? Every attempt should be made to get previous films. 2) Investigation when results are unlikely to affect patient management: The anticipated 'positive' finding is usually irrelevant, e.g. degenerative spinal disease (as 'normal' as white hairs in old age) or because a positive finding is so unlikely. DO I NEED IT?
  • 57.
    3) Investigating toooften:- i.e. before the disease could have progressed or resolved or before the results could influence treatment. DO I NEED IT NOW? Or some clinicians tend to rely on investigations more than others. ARE TOO MANY INVESTIGATIONS BEING PERFORMED? 4) Doing the wrong investigation:- Imaging techniques are developing rapidly. It is often helpful to discuss an investigation with a specialist in clinical radiology or nuclear medicine before it is requested. IS THIS THE BEST INVESTIGATION? 5) Failing to provide appropriate clinical information & questions that imaging Investigation should answer. Deficiencies here may lead to the wrong technique being used (e.g. the omission of an essential view). HAVE I EXPLAINED THE PROBLEM?
  • 58.
    OPTIMIZATION:- Once a practiceis justified, the exposure to ionising radiation should be kept as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).
  • 59.
  • 60.
    DISTANCE INVERSE SQUARE LAW: Intensityof radiation is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of radiation. In equation form: For Example: If the dose is 9 R at 3 feet, stepping back to a distance of 6 feet will cause the dose to decrease to 2.25 R.
  • 61.
    57cm from x-raysource 50cm from x-ray source
  • 62.
    EXPOSURE TIME  Theamount of radiation received is proportional to the length of the exposure time.  Minimized by conducting procedures as quickly as possible.  For Example, using short bursts of fluoroscopy. Employing image intensifiers & Intensifying screens. Using high kVp , low maS techniques.
  • 63.
    BARRIERS & SHIELDING The most commonly used protective material is lead. It has a double advantage of high density and high atomic number.  Lead equivalent: it is the thickness of lead which provide the same degree of protection as the material. ROOM SHIELDING:  Should be located as far as away from areas of high occupancy and general traffic.  Wall on which primary beam falls should not be less than 35 cm thick brick or equivalent.  Shielding of 1.7mm lead (23 cm brick) in front of doors & windows of x-ray room.
  • 64.
    X-RAY CONTROL ROOM: Walls &viewing windows of control booth should have lead equivalent of 1.5 mm. Distance between control panel & X-ray unit / chest stand should be minimum 3 meters.
  • 65.
    PATIENT WAITING ROOM: Provided outside X-ray room a proper warning signal when unit is in use.  Warning devices may include audible and visual signs.
  • 66.
    LEAD APRON:-  Typicallythickness of 0.5 mm lead equivalent is used.  Weight ranges from 2.5 to 7 kg.  Should cover much of red bone marrow & breast. LEAD GLOVES:  Lead salts or metallic lead are added to rubber or plastic.  Lead equivalent of these is about ¼ mm.
  • 67.
    LEAD GLASS:  Madeby adding lead salts to silicates , in the manufacturing of glass.  It is acceptably transparent and a better protective material.  Contains 60% of lead by weight. GONADAL SHIELDING:  Must be 0.5 mm of lead.  Must be used when gonads will lie within 5 cm of the collimated area.  Separate male vs. female shielding available.
  • 68.
  • 69.
  • 70.
     Have standardprojections for specific indications.  Additional views - on a case-by-case basis  Use PA projections, where practical, for chest and spine radiographs.  Avoid repeating exposures.  Use safe exposure factors – high KVp and low mAs technique. Never stand in the primary beam. Always wear protective apparel when not behind a protective barrier. Always wear a radiation monitor and position it outside the protective apron at collar level. The person holding the patient must wear protective apron and if possible gloves. Always collimate to smallest field size appropriate to examination.
  • 71.
    RADIATION MONITORING DEVICES Non-SelfReading Devices: 1) FILM BADGES:  Consist of a small dental–sized film wrapped in light proof paper and mounted in a holder filled with metallic filters of different thicknesses. 2) THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS (TLD):  They are used to measure external individual whole body doses from X-rays , beta rays & gamma radiation.  It consists of a TLD card loaded in a cassette (card holder ) having suitable metallic & plastic filters.
  • 72.
    TLD Ring orFinger badges:  Ring or finger badges are worn by fluoroscopists & interventional radiologists who usually receive high doses to their extremities.  The ring dosimeter contains a small radiation-sensitive lithium fluoride crystal.
  • 73.
    SELF READING DEVICES: Realtime dose information available Needs frequent Calibration checks Can be taken from hospital to hospital. Good for visiting consultants surgeons, anesthetists, urologists, gastroenterologists etc.
  • 74.
    Summary  Ionizing radiationuse should be only used when benefit outweighs possible risks.  Every examination should be justified.  Optimized protocols for lowering patient dose without affecting accurate diagnosis should be done.  Use all kinds of radiation protection during work...It's your life.!
  • 75.
    IAEA 3 :Biological effects of ionizing radiation3 : Biological effects of ionizing radiation 75 Where to Get More Information (1) • The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP 103, Annals of the ICRP 37(2-4):1-332 (2007) • UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, United Nations, Vienna, Austria, 2008 • Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85. Ann ICRP 2000;30 (2). Elsevier