SlideShare a Scribd company logo
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF
IONIZING RADIATION
H.L.ANIL RANJITH
HEAD
DIVISION OF RADIATION PROTECTION
ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY
Module 1.1. Basic concepts
• 1895 X-rays discovered by Roentgen
• 1896 First skin burns reported
• 1896 First use of x-rays in the treatment of cancer
• 1896 Becquerel: Discovery of radioactivity
• 1897 First cases of skin damage reported
• 1902 First report of x-ray induced cancer
• 1911 First report of leukaemia in humans and lung
cancer from occupational exposure
• 1911 94 cases of tumour reported in Germany
(50 being radiologists)
Early Observations of the Effects
of Ionising Radiation
Information comes from:
 studies of humans (epidemiology)
 studies of animals and plants (experimental radiobiology)
 fundamental studies of cells and their components
(cellular and molecular biology)
The key to understanding the health effects of radiation
is the interaction between these sources of information
Effects of Radiation Exposure
CELL
• IS THE BASIC UNIT OF
LIFE
• MAKES ORGANS
AND TISSUES
• HUMAN BODY CONSISTS
OF 1014
SUCH CELLS
• BIOLOGICAL TISSUES
COMPRIZE OF 70% OF
WATER
CELL MEMBRANE: CONTROL
INTAKE & OUTPUT OF SOLUBLE
SUBSTANCE
NUCLEAR
MEMBRANE
NUCLEUS
CONTAINS DNA,
CHROMOSOME,
GENES ETC.
CYTOPLASM
FLUID LIKE SUBSTANCE THAT
CONTAINS MANY SEPARATE
CONSTITUENTS
DIRECT ACTION ON
CELLS
• IN DIRECT ACTION,THE
SENSITIVE VOLUME OF
THE CELL IS AFFECTED
BY DIRECT TRANSFER
OF ENERGY FROM
RADIATION TO THE
CELL AND SENSITIVE
VOLUME CAN BE
INACTIVATED
INDIRECT ACTION
ON CELLS
• IN INDIRECT ACTION,
THE SENSITIVE
VOLUME OF THE CELL
IS INACTIVATED BY
TRANSFER OF ENERGY
FROM ANOTHER
VOLUME THAT HAS
ABSORBED ENERGY
FROM RADIATION
Direct
effects
Indirect
effects
Cell death
Primary
damage
Modified
cell
Damage
to organ
Somatic
cells
Germ
cells
Hereditary
effects
Cancer
Leukemia
Death of
organism
Repair
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTSBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS
Determinististic
effects
Stochastic
effects
Biological Effects of Radiation
Deterministic Effects Stochastic Effects
Due to large doses of radiation
exposure during short period of
time
Due to large short term doses, or
smaller doses received over a long
period of time.
Deterministic effects
(Short term biological effects)
Dose
Severity
..
threshold
• lots of cells killed in a given tissue or organ
– high dose
• cell replacement (if able to happen) will tend to offset cell
killing
Stochastic effects
Long Term Biological Effects (Chronic Radiation Effects)
Cancer
Hereditary Effects
Probability
ofeffect
Dose
•
All radiation induced cancers have a long latent period
before they are detected.
• The shortest latent period is about 5-10 year for
Leukemia, and about 20 - 30 years for solid tumors.
SOMATIC EFFECTS
• ARISE FROM DAMAGE TO CELLS IN A
PARTICLLAR TISSUE AND AFFECT
ONLY TO THE IRRADIATED PERSON
• CAN BE EITHER STOCHASTIC EFFECT
OR DETERMINISTIC EFFECT
HERIDITORY EFFECTS
• OCCUR IN CHILDREN OR FUTURE
GENERATIONS OF IRRIDIATED
PERSON DUE TO A ALTERED GERM
CELL
• ARE STOCHASTIC EFFECTS
In direct Action on Cells
Indirect Actions
When water is irradiated with Ionizing
radiation, the following reactions take
place.
H2O H2O+
+ e -
1.1
Positive ion dissolves immediately.
H2O+
H+
+ OH 1.2
Electron is picket up by a neutral water
molecule.
H2O + e-
H2O-
1.3
This also dissolves immediately.
H2O-
H + OH-
1.4
H and OH are free radicals and are highly
reactive.
(The reactions 1.1 1.4 last only about
10-6
s)
The free radicals H & OH may recombine
or react with other molecules.
If OH radicals are in close proximity, they
can recombine to form H2O2
OH + OH H2O2
If irradiated water contains dissolved O2
the following reaction will take place.
H + O2 HO2
Since this hydroperoxyl radical has longer
life time which allows.
H + HO2 H2O2
Since H2O2is a relatively stable oxydizing
agent, H2O2 can affect molecules or cells .
Direct Action on Cells
Direct Actions
Direct ionization of molecules and
atoms of a cell
Any part of the cell may be damaged
DNA damage is important
Biological Effects
• At low doses, damage to a cell is a random
effect - either there is energy deposition or
not.
Interaction of ionizing radiation
with DNA
DIRECT ACTIONDIRECT ACTION INDIRECT ACTIONINDIRECT ACTION
Damages to DNA
The critical Target of the cell
Damages to the DNA
Three major types can be discussed.
• DNA Base Damage
- This is the most common damage to
the DNA molecules.
- If the cell remain unprepared it can
survive and reproduce as a altered
cell.
The critical target: DNA
Damage to DNA
Damages to Stands
Single strand break.
• Braking of a one strand
• Can be quickly repaired.
Double strand break
• Braking of both strands either by
single event or two separate event.
Single event Two separate event
DAMAGE TO THE CELLS BY
RADIATION CAN CAUSE:
• DELAY IN CELL REPRODUCTION
• CHROMOSOME ABERATION
• CELL DEATH
• GENE MUTATION ETC.
Module 1.2. Deterministic effects
DETERMINISTIC EFFECTS
• OCCURS DUE TO CELL KILING AND
THE PREVENTION OR DELAY OF
CELL DIVISION
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
FREQUENCY
ABSORBED DOSE
SEVERITY
Diagnostic
threshold
Threshold
dose
Mostradiosensitive
individual
Mostradioresistant
individual
Deterministic effects
31
Deterministic effects
• Due to cell killing
• Have a dose
threshold
• Specific to
particular tissues
• Severity of harm is
dose dependent
Radiation injury from an industrial source
Examples for deterministic
effects
• Skin breakdown
• Cataract of the lens of the eye
• Sterility
• Kidney failure
• Acute radiation syndrome (whole body)
Skin reactions
Injury
Threshold
Dose to
Skin (Sv)
Weeks to
Onset
Early transient erythema 2 <<1
Temporary epilation 3 3
Main erythema 6 1.5
Permanent epilation 7 3
Dry desquamation 10 4
Invasive fibrosis 10
Dermal atrophy 11 >14
Telangiectasis 12 >52
Moist desquamation 15 4
Late erythema 15 6-10
Dermal necrosis 18 >10
Secondary ulceration 20 >6
Skin damage
from prolonged
fluoroscopic
exposure
Threshold Doses for Deterministic
Effects
• Cataracts of the lens of the eye 2-10 Gy
• Permanent sterility
– males 3.5-6 Gy
– females 2.5-6 Gy
• Temporary sterility
– males 0.15 Gy
– females 0.6 Gy dose
Severity of
effect
threshold
Note on threshold values
• Depend on dose delivery mode:
– single high dose most effective
– fractionation increases threshold dose in most
cases significantly
– decreasing the dose rate increases threshold in
most cases
• Threshold may differ in different persons
Threshold doses for deterministic
effects
Organ doses for adults
typically > 50 Gy
Absorbed dose (Gy) Syndrome or Tissues
involved
Symptoms
1 - 2 Bone marrow Mild leucopenia and
thrombopenia
2 - 10 Bone marrow syndrome Leucopenia, thrombopenia,
hemorrhage, infections
10 - 15 Intestinal syndrome Diarrhoea, fever, electrolytic
imbalance
> 15 Neurological syndrome Cramps, tremor, ataxia,
lethargy, impaired vision,
coma
Absorbed dose
(Gy)
Therapy Prognosis Lethality
1 – 2 Symptomatic Excellent 0-10 %
2 – 10 Transfusions of
leucocytes and
platelets. Bone
marrow
transplantation.
Growth stimulating
factors
Uncertain 0-90%
10-15 Palliative Very poor 90 - 100 %
> 15 Symptomatic Hopeless 100 %
Whole body exposureWhole body exposure
Radiation induced skin injuries
Effect
Typical
threshold
dose (Gy)
Fluoroscopic
on time
(minutes) to
reach
threshold at a
dose rate of
50 mGy per
min
Fluoroscopic
on time
(minutes) to
reach
threshold at
a dose rate
of 100 mGy
per min
Time to
onset of the
effect
Early transient erythema 2 40 20 hours
Temporary epilation 3 60 30 ~3 weeks
Main erythema 6 120 60 ~10 days
Permanent epilation 7 140 70 ~3 weeks
Dry desquamation 10 200 100 ~4 weeks
Invasive fibrosis 10 200 100 ------------
Dermal atrophy 11 220 110 >14 weeks
Telangiectasia 12 240 120 >52 weeks
Moist desquamation 15 300 150 ~4 weeks
Late erythema 15 300 150 ~6-10 weeks
Dermal necrosis 18 360 180 >10 weeks
Secondary ulceration 20 400 200 >6 weeks
RADIOSENSITIVITY
High RS Medium RS Low RS
Bone Marrow
Spleen
Thymus
Lymphatic nodes
Gonads
Eye lens
Lymphocytes
(exception to the
RS laws)
Skin
Mesoderm organs
(liver, heart,
lungs…)
Muscle
Bones
Nervous system
Module 1.3. Stochastic effects
STOCHASTIC EFFECTS
• MAY BE DUE TO EITHER A SINGLE
LARGE OVER EXPOSURE OR
CONTINUING LOW LEVEL OVER
EXPOSURE
• RESULTS FROM :
CHROMOSOME ABERATIONS AND,
GENE MUTATIONS
Damage to DNA
Chromosome Aberration and Gene
Mutation
If the stands broken are not repaired, the end of
the breaks can attach to the broken or unbroken
chromosomes (healthy ones) and result
chromosome aberrations, and gene mutations etc.
Stochastic effects
• Due to cell changes (DNA) and proliferation
towards a malignant disease
• Severity (i.e. cancer) independent of the dose
• No dose threshold (they are presumed to occur at
any dose however small)
• Probability of effect increases with dose
Cancer
Over proliferation of viable cells which
have received damages to their control
systems in the form of gene mutations or
chromosome aberrations.
… order of magnitudes
• 1cm3
of tissue = 109
cells
• 1 mGy --> 1 in 1000 or 106
cells hit
• 999 of 1000 lesions are repaired - leaving 103
cells
damaged
• 999 of 1000 damaged cells die (not a major
problem as millions of cells die every day in every
person)
• 1 cell may live with damage (could be mutated)
RADIOSENSITIVITY
High RS Medium RS Low RS
Bone Marrow
Spleen
Thymus
Lymphatic nodes
Gonads
Eye lens
Lymphocytes
(exception to the
RS laws)
Skin
Mesoderm organs
(liver, heart,
lungs…)
Muscle
Bones
Nervous system
SENSITIVE ORGANS TO RADIATION INDUCED
CANCERS
• Female breast
• Lungs
• Bone
• Thyroid and
• Skin
• Current best estimate of the fatality risk from
radiation induced cancer is 5 per 100 person – Sievert.
This means that, if 20000 people were each given 1.0
mSv, one of them may die 20 – 30 years later due to a
cancer induced by that dose. However in that
population of 20000 people, about 3200 of them would
die from normal cancer in 20 – 30 years.
Module 1.4. Effects on embryo and fetus
Radiation effects on the
embryo/foetus
• lethal effects
• malformations/growth anomalies
• mental retardation
• cancer
– childhood, adulthood
• hereditary effects
• For a dose of 10 mSv, probability of the above is
less than 0.2%, compared with about 6% natural
incidence of the same.
Effects of Antenatal Exposure
• The effects on the embryo/fetus depend on the time of
exposure relative to conception.
• Lethal effects can be induced in experimental animal by
relatively low doses (such as 100 mSv) before or immediately
after implantation of the embryo into the uterine wall.
• They may also be induced after higher doses during all stages
of intra-uterine development.
• Exposure of the embryo in the first three weeks following
conception is not likely to result in deterministic or stochastic
effects in the live-born child, despite the fact that the central
nervous system and the heart are beginning to develop in the
third week. It is thought that any cellular damage at this stage
is much more likely to cause the death of the embryo/fetus than
to result in stochastic effects expressed in the live-born.
PRE-IMPLANTATION
Pre-implant stage (up to 10 days) Only lethal effect, all or none
 Embryo contains only few cells which are
not specialized
 If too many cell are damaged-embryo is
resorbed
 If only few killed-remaining pluripotent
cells replace the cells loss within few cell
divisions
 Atomic Bomb survivors - high incidence of
both - normal birth and spontaneous
abortion
Effects of Antenatal Exposure
Malformation
• During the period of major organogenesis, conventionally
from the start of the third week after conception, malformations
may be caused in the organ under development at time of
exposure. These effects are deterministic in character with a
threshold in man, estimated from animal experiments, to be
about 0.1 Gy.
• Throughout the period from 3 weeks after conception until the
end of pregnancy, it is likely that radiation exposure can cause
stochastic effects resulting in an increased probability of cancer
in the live-born. The available data are not consistent and
considerable uncertainty exists. However, the ICRP assumes
that the nominal fatality probability coefficient is, at most, a
few times that for the population as a whole. Irradiated fetus
seem to be susceptible to childhood leukemia and other
childhood cancers which expressed approximately during the
first decade of life.
Effects of Antenatal Exposure
Loss of Intelligence
• Values of intelligence quotient (IQ) lower than expected reported in some
children exposed in utero.
• Mental retardation was not observed to be induced by radiation prior to 8
weeks from conception ,or after 25 weeeks. The period 8-15 weeks are more
sensitive than the period 16-25 weeks. During the most sensitive period, the
fraction of those exposed which became severely mentally retarded increased
by approximately 0.4 per Sv. During weeks 16-25, it increased by about 0.1 per
Sv.
• Observed a gneral downward shift in the distribution of IQ with increasing
dose. the shift is proportional to dose. Small shifts cannot be clinically
identified. A coefficient of about 30 IQ points per Sv relates exposure from 8
weeks to 15 weeks after conception. A similar, but smaller shift, is detectable
exposure in the period from 16 weeks to 25 weeks.
At doses of the order of 0.1 Sv, no effect would be detectable in the general
distribution of IQ, but at somewhat large doses the effect might be sufficient to
show an increase in the number of children classified as severely retarded. All
the observations on IQ and severe mental retardation relate to high dose.
Radiation-Induced Malformations
• Malformations have a threshold of 100-200
mGy or higher and are typically associated
with central nervous system problems
• Fetal doses of 100 mGy are not reached even
with 3 pelvic CT scans or 20 conventional
diagnostic x-ray examinations
• These levels can be reached with
fluoroscopically guided interventional
procedures of the pelvis and with radiotherapy
Central Nervous System
Effects
• During 8-25 weeks post-conception the
CNS is particularly sensitive to radiation
• Fetal doses in excess of 100 mGy can
result in some reduction of IQ
(intelligence quotient)
• Fetal doses in the range of 1000 mGy can
result in severe mental retardation
particularly during 8-15 weeks and to a
lesser extent at 16-25 weeks
Leukemia and Cancer
• Radiation has been shown to increase the
risk for leukemia and many types of cancer
in adults and children
• Throughout most of pregnancy, the
embryo/fetus is assumed to be at about the
same risk for carcinogenic effects as
children
Leukemia and Cancer
• The relative risk may be as high as 1.4
(40% increase over normal incidence) due
to a fetal dose of 10 mGy
• Individual risk, however, is small with the
risk of cancer at ages 0-15 being about 1
excess cancer death per 1,700 children
exposed “in utero” to 10 mGy
Module 1.5. Risk estimates
How do we know about radiation
induced cancer?
• epidemiological studies
– A bomb survivors (Life Span Study)
– Medical exposures
(eg Ankylosing Spondylitis Study)
– Occupational exposures
(eg. UK National Register for
Radiation Workers)
• molecular biology studies
Epidemiological studies - features
• Large population size
– Up to 100 000
• Years of follow-up
– Often 30 or more years
• Mix of ages, sex, ethnic groups
• Setting
– War, medical, occupational
• Organs irradiated
– All, through to specific organs
• Dose range
– Mainly medium to high
• Dose rate
– Mainly high
Cancer risk estimates
• Estimated lifetime fatal cancer risk for the general
population with exposure to low LET radiation at high
doses and dose rates
– ICRP 60 risk estimate
– 10% per Sv
• It is assumed there is NO threshold
• Allowance is made for low doses/dose rates
– ICRP 60 used a factor of 2
– 5% per Sv at low doses/dose rates
– for workers the risk is assessed at 4% per Sv at low
doses/dose rates
Lifetime fatal cancer risks - low dose/rate
• Risk per 100 person Sv
Organ ICRP 26 ICRP 60
Bone marrow 0.20 0.50
Bone surfaces 0.05 0.05
Lung 0.20 0.85
Thyroid 0.05 0.08
Breast 0.25 0.20
Colon 0.85
Oesophagus 0.30
Stomach 1.10
Liver 0.15
Urinary bladder 0.30
Skin 0.02
Ovaries 0.10
Remainder 0.50 0.50
TOTAL 1.25 5.00
Hereditary effects of radiation
• effects associated with gene mutations and
chromosomal aberrations induced in parental germ
cells and transmitted to progeny
• radiation does not produce new, unique mutations
• information for humans is inconclusive - no direct
evidence
• probability of hereditary effects is proportional to
the gonadal dose
Hereditary Effects of Radiation
• Ionising radiation is known to cause heritable
mutations in many plants and animals
BUT
• intensive studies of 70,000 offspring of the
atomic bomb survivors have failed to identify an
increase in congenital anomalies, cancer,
chromosome aberrations in circulating
lymphocytes or mutational blood protein
changes.Neel et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1990, 46:1053-1072Neel et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1990, 46:1053-1072
Estimating risks of hereditary effects
• hereditary effects are stochastic in nature, with the
amount of radiation exposure determining the
probability of occurrence
• current risk estimates for hereditary effects over all
generations
– 2.4 x 10-2
per Sv - dose to gonads, reproductive pop
– 1.0 x 10-2
per Sv - dose to gonads, general pop
• A derived figure to assess the risks of occupational
exposures
– 0.6 x 10-2
per Sv - dose to gonads, worker population
HIROSHIMA 1945 :
Total Population : 330000
Deaths : 110000
Injured : 80000
NAGASAKI 1945 :
Total Population : 210000
Deaths : 70000
Injured : 28000
HIROSHIMA 1945 :
70000 new born children 1946 – 1953
showed no genetic effects.
(Parents were survivors of Hiroshima
or Nagasaki atomic bomb explosion)
HIROSHIMA 1945 :
No. of monitored pregnancies
1945 / 46 : ca. 2800
No effect :
0 – 8 weeks
after 25 weeks
HIROSHIMA 1945 :
Findings :
• Decrease of IQ
(foetus exposed)
• Delayed growth and development
(exposed at young
age)
• Leukemia
STOCHASTIC EFFECTS OF
IONIZING RADIATION
Thyroid cancer diagnosed up to 1998 among
children 0-17 years at the time of the Chernobyl
accident
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Year
Number
Belarus
Russian Federation
Ukraine
Total
Comparison of Radiation Worker Risks
to Other Workers
Mean death rate 1989
(10-6
/y)
Trade 40
Manufacture 60
Service 40
Government 90
Transport/utilities 240
Construction 320
Agriculture 400
Mines/quarries 430
Safe industries
≡ 2 mSv/y (100 mSv over
a lifetime)
≡ max permissible exposuremax permissible exposure
(20 mSv/year or 1000 mSv(20 mSv/year or 1000 mSv
over a lifetimeover a lifetime
The following activities are associated with
a risk of death that is 1/1000000
•10 days work in a nuclear medicine department
• smoking 1.4 cigarette
• living 2 days in a polluted city
• traveling 6 min in a canoe
• 1.5 min mountaineering
• traveling 480 km in a car
• traveling 1600 km in an airplane
• living 2 months together with a smoker
• drinking 30 cans of diet soda
RISKS
In Perspective
• Loss of Life in Days
– Unmarried Male – 3500 (~10 yr)
– Unmarried Female – 2250 (~5 yr)
– Smoking(1 pk/day) – 2250 (~ 7 yr)
– 25% Overweight – 777 (~ 2 yr)
– Alcohol Consumption – 465 (~ 1 yr)
– Driving a motor vehicle - 207
– Radiation (1 mSv/yr for 70 years) - 10
Questions??

More Related Content

What's hot

Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pkRadiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Dr pradeep Kumar
 
Radiation protection
Radiation protectionRadiation protection
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....Koustav Majumder
 
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationBiological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
mahbubul hassan
 
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and RadioprotectorsLET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
DrAyush Garg
 
Radiation protection
Radiation protectionRadiation protection
Radiation protectionjyotimannath
 
Radiation Dosimeters
Radiation DosimetersRadiation Dosimeters
Radiation DosimetersAdel Shaher
 
Biological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiationsBiological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiations
Mirza Anwar Baig
 
Radiobiology
RadiobiologyRadiobiology
Radiobiology
ErenyPoles
 
Nuclear medicine scan.ppt
Nuclear medicine scan.pptNuclear medicine scan.ppt
Nuclear medicine scan.ppt
عبدالله فهد
 
Radiobiology
RadiobiologyRadiobiology
Radiobiology
Shabeer Ali Kp
 
Radiation protection in nuclear medicine shafiee
Radiation protection in nuclear medicine shafieeRadiation protection in nuclear medicine shafiee
Radiation protection in nuclear medicine shafiee
Urmia Nuclear Medicine Center
 
Radiation Protection Standards
Radiation Protection StandardsRadiation Protection Standards
Radiation Protection Standards
Subhash Verma
 
radIATION UNITS
radIATION UNITS radIATION UNITS
radIATION UNITS
SAlonii Chawla
 
Injuries from radiations
Injuries from radiationsInjuries from radiations
Injuries from radiations
Umar Tauqir
 
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationLecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Albania Energy Association
 
Production of x rays
Production of x rays Production of x rays
Production of x rays
VIneeth C
 

What's hot (20)

Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pkRadiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
Radiation protection PowerPoint slide PPT pk
 
Radiation protection
Radiation protectionRadiation protection
Radiation protection
 
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
radiation protection...Koustav Majumder....
 
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationBiological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
 
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and RadioprotectorsLET & RBE and Radioprotectors
LET & RBE and Radioprotectors
 
Radiation protection
Radiation protectionRadiation protection
Radiation protection
 
Radiation Dosimeters
Radiation DosimetersRadiation Dosimeters
Radiation Dosimeters
 
Biological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiationsBiological effects of radiations
Biological effects of radiations
 
Radiation units
Radiation unitsRadiation units
Radiation units
 
Radiobiology
RadiobiologyRadiobiology
Radiobiology
 
Nuclear medicine scan.ppt
Nuclear medicine scan.pptNuclear medicine scan.ppt
Nuclear medicine scan.ppt
 
Radiobiology
RadiobiologyRadiobiology
Radiobiology
 
Radiation protection in nuclear medicine shafiee
Radiation protection in nuclear medicine shafieeRadiation protection in nuclear medicine shafiee
Radiation protection in nuclear medicine shafiee
 
Radiation Protection Standards
Radiation Protection StandardsRadiation Protection Standards
Radiation Protection Standards
 
radIATION UNITS
radIATION UNITS radIATION UNITS
radIATION UNITS
 
Injuries from radiations
Injuries from radiationsInjuries from radiations
Injuries from radiations
 
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing RadiationLecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Lecture 4-Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
 
Radiation Protection
Radiation ProtectionRadiation Protection
Radiation Protection
 
Production of x rays
Production of x rays Production of x rays
Production of x rays
 
OSLD Prsentation
OSLD PrsentationOSLD Prsentation
OSLD Prsentation
 

Viewers also liked

Biological effects of ionizing radiations..what every physician must know
Biological effects of ionizing radiations..what every physician must knowBiological effects of ionizing radiations..what every physician must know
Biological effects of ionizing radiations..what every physician must knowAhmed Bahnassy
 
Chemotherapy &amp; radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Chemotherapy &amp; radiotherapy/ dental implant coursesChemotherapy &amp; radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Chemotherapy &amp; radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Indian dental academy
 
Biological Effects Of Emr
Biological Effects Of EmrBiological Effects Of Emr
Biological Effects Of Emr
Neha Kumar
 
Eye Injuries
Eye InjuriesEye Injuries
Eye Injuries
pdhpemag
 
Radiation Injuries To Eye
Radiation Injuries To EyeRadiation Injuries To Eye
Radiation Injuries To Eye
Ankit Punjabi
 
L03 Biological Effects
L03 Biological EffectsL03 Biological Effects
L03 Biological Effectslidgor
 
Dose Response In Prostate Cancer
Dose Response In Prostate CancerDose Response In Prostate Cancer
Dose Response In Prostate Cancerfondas vakalis
 
Radiation effect on cell
Radiation effect on cellRadiation effect on cell
Radiation effect on cellDeepaGautam
 
biological hazards of radiation
biological hazards of radiation biological hazards of radiation
biological hazards of radiation
Aiswarya Thomas
 
CHROMOSOMES
CHROMOSOMES CHROMOSOMES
Cytogenetics 1
Cytogenetics 1Cytogenetics 1
Cytogenetics 1
137156
 
Radiation Biology
Radiation BiologyRadiation Biology
Radiation Biology
IAU Dent
 
Karyotyping
KaryotypingKaryotyping
Karyotyping
wildask
 
Noise &amp; Radiation - health Effect
Noise &amp;  Radiation -  health EffectNoise &amp;  Radiation -  health Effect
Noise &amp; Radiation - health Effect
Shahid Mahmood
 
Basic genetics ,mutation and karyotyping
Basic genetics ,mutation and karyotypingBasic genetics ,mutation and karyotyping
Basic genetics ,mutation and karyotypingAamir Sharif
 
Ppt on karyotyping, chromosome banding and chromosome painting.
Ppt on karyotyping, chromosome banding and chromosome painting.Ppt on karyotyping, chromosome banding and chromosome painting.
Ppt on karyotyping, chromosome banding and chromosome painting.
ICRISAT
 
Karyotypes and Karyotyping
Karyotypes and KaryotypingKaryotypes and Karyotyping
Karyotypes and Karyotyping
Saima Bugvi
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Biological effects of ionizing radiations..what every physician must know
Biological effects of ionizing radiations..what every physician must knowBiological effects of ionizing radiations..what every physician must know
Biological effects of ionizing radiations..what every physician must know
 
Chemotherapy &amp; radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Chemotherapy &amp; radiotherapy/ dental implant coursesChemotherapy &amp; radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
Chemotherapy &amp; radiotherapy/ dental implant courses
 
Biological Effects Of Emr
Biological Effects Of EmrBiological Effects Of Emr
Biological Effects Of Emr
 
Eye Injuries
Eye InjuriesEye Injuries
Eye Injuries
 
Radiation Injuries To Eye
Radiation Injuries To EyeRadiation Injuries To Eye
Radiation Injuries To Eye
 
L03 Biological Effects
L03 Biological EffectsL03 Biological Effects
L03 Biological Effects
 
Dose Response In Prostate Cancer
Dose Response In Prostate CancerDose Response In Prostate Cancer
Dose Response In Prostate Cancer
 
Radiation effect on cell
Radiation effect on cellRadiation effect on cell
Radiation effect on cell
 
biological hazards of radiation
biological hazards of radiation biological hazards of radiation
biological hazards of radiation
 
Karyotyping
KaryotypingKaryotyping
Karyotyping
 
KARYOTYPING
KARYOTYPINGKARYOTYPING
KARYOTYPING
 
CHROMOSOMES
CHROMOSOMES CHROMOSOMES
CHROMOSOMES
 
Basics Of Radiation
Basics Of RadiationBasics Of Radiation
Basics Of Radiation
 
Cytogenetics 1
Cytogenetics 1Cytogenetics 1
Cytogenetics 1
 
Radiation Biology
Radiation BiologyRadiation Biology
Radiation Biology
 
Karyotyping
KaryotypingKaryotyping
Karyotyping
 
Noise &amp; Radiation - health Effect
Noise &amp;  Radiation -  health EffectNoise &amp;  Radiation -  health Effect
Noise &amp; Radiation - health Effect
 
Basic genetics ,mutation and karyotyping
Basic genetics ,mutation and karyotypingBasic genetics ,mutation and karyotyping
Basic genetics ,mutation and karyotyping
 
Ppt on karyotyping, chromosome banding and chromosome painting.
Ppt on karyotyping, chromosome banding and chromosome painting.Ppt on karyotyping, chromosome banding and chromosome painting.
Ppt on karyotyping, chromosome banding and chromosome painting.
 
Karyotypes and Karyotyping
Karyotypes and KaryotypingKaryotypes and Karyotyping
Karyotypes and Karyotyping
 

Similar to Rp003 biological effects of ionizing radiation 2

BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATIONBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
Mdshams244
 
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptxBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
SubamProjects
 
seminar.pptx
seminar.pptxseminar.pptx
seminar.pptx
AbinVl1
 
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safetyBiological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Lama K Banna
 
Radiation effects
Radiation effectsRadiation effects
Radiation effectsnobuggingme
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiation
Nuthan DeSouza
 
L5 biological effects
L5 biological effectsL5 biological effects
L5 biological effects
Mahbubul Hassan
 
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.pptZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
icchapipesh
 
Acute radiation syndrome Dr Kiran
Acute radiation syndrome Dr KiranAcute radiation syndrome Dr Kiran
Acute radiation syndrome Dr Kiran
Kiran Ramakrishna
 
Acute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndromeAcute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndrome
Kiran Ramakrishna
 
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION (2).pdf
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION  (2).pdfBIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION  (2).pdf
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION (2).pdf
iloveimo025
 
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
Harsh Mohan
 
Additional Information Low Dose Effects.ppt
Additional Information Low Dose Effects.pptAdditional Information Low Dose Effects.ppt
Additional Information Low Dose Effects.ppt
Gaurav Jaswal
 
Effects of Radiation
Effects of RadiationEffects of Radiation
Effects of Radiation
SzeMin Chong
 
radumcase2ppt-160412114039.pdf cell cycle
radumcase2ppt-160412114039.pdf cell cycleradumcase2ppt-160412114039.pdf cell cycle
radumcase2ppt-160412114039.pdf cell cycle
mansidhingra05
 
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
cochachi
 
ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME.pptx
ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME.pptxACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME.pptx
ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME.pptx
Dr Monica P
 
Systemic Effects of radiation exposure
Systemic Effects of radiation exposureSystemic Effects of radiation exposure
Systemic Effects of radiation exposureDr Namrata Mohan
 
Biologic effects Daniel jayaprakash
Biologic effects Daniel jayaprakashBiologic effects Daniel jayaprakash
Biologic effects Daniel jayaprakash
almasmkm
 
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.pptZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
icchapipesh
 

Similar to Rp003 biological effects of ionizing radiation 2 (20)

BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATIONBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION
 
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptxBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RADIATION USHA YADAV.pptx
 
seminar.pptx
seminar.pptxseminar.pptx
seminar.pptx
 
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safetyBiological effect of radiation and radiation safety
Biological effect of radiation and radiation safety
 
Radiation effects
Radiation effectsRadiation effects
Radiation effects
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiation
 
L5 biological effects
L5 biological effectsL5 biological effects
L5 biological effects
 
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.pptZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
ZOM703_Radiation_Toxicity.ppt
 
Acute radiation syndrome Dr Kiran
Acute radiation syndrome Dr KiranAcute radiation syndrome Dr Kiran
Acute radiation syndrome Dr Kiran
 
Acute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndromeAcute radiation syndrome
Acute radiation syndrome
 
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION (2).pdf
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION  (2).pdfBIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION  (2).pdf
BIOLOGICAL_EFFECTS_OF_RADIATION (2).pdf
 
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
2018 HM - RADIATION BIOLOGICAL EFFECT
 
Additional Information Low Dose Effects.ppt
Additional Information Low Dose Effects.pptAdditional Information Low Dose Effects.ppt
Additional Information Low Dose Effects.ppt
 
Effects of Radiation
Effects of RadiationEffects of Radiation
Effects of Radiation
 
radumcase2ppt-160412114039.pdf cell cycle
radumcase2ppt-160412114039.pdf cell cycleradumcase2ppt-160412114039.pdf cell cycle
radumcase2ppt-160412114039.pdf cell cycle
 
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
001 Efectos Biológicos de las radiaciones ionizantes.pdf
 
ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME.pptx
ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME.pptxACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME.pptx
ACUTE RADIATION SYNDROME.pptx
 
Systemic Effects of radiation exposure
Systemic Effects of radiation exposureSystemic Effects of radiation exposure
Systemic Effects of radiation exposure
 
Biologic effects Daniel jayaprakash
Biologic effects Daniel jayaprakashBiologic effects Daniel jayaprakash
Biologic effects Daniel jayaprakash
 
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.pptZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
ZOM703_Biological_Effects_of_Ionizing_Radiation.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
kevinkariuki227
 
Alcohol_Dr. Jeenal Mistry MD Pharmacology.pdf
Alcohol_Dr. Jeenal Mistry MD Pharmacology.pdfAlcohol_Dr. Jeenal Mistry MD Pharmacology.pdf
Alcohol_Dr. Jeenal Mistry MD Pharmacology.pdf
Dr Jeenal Mistry
 
Ocular injury ppt Upendra pal optometrist upums saifai etawah
Ocular injury  ppt  Upendra pal  optometrist upums saifai etawahOcular injury  ppt  Upendra pal  optometrist upums saifai etawah
Ocular injury ppt Upendra pal optometrist upums saifai etawah
pal078100
 
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptxHow STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
FFragrant
 
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.GawadHemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
NephroTube - Dr.Gawad
 
Surat @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8527049040❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Surat @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8527049040❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model SafeSurat @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8527049040❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Surat @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8527049040❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Savita Shen $i11
 
New Drug Discovery and Development .....
New Drug Discovery and Development .....New Drug Discovery and Development .....
New Drug Discovery and Development .....
NEHA GUPTA
 
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdf
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN  HEALTHCARE.pdfARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN  HEALTHCARE.pdf
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdf
Anujkumaranit
 
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of TastePhysiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
MedicoseAcademics
 
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,
sisternakatoto
 
Novas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidade
Novas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidadeNovas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidade
Novas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidade
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
 
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness JourneyTom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
greendigital
 
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...
i3 Health
 
For Better Surat #ℂall #Girl Service ❤85270-49040❤ Surat #ℂall #Girls
For Better Surat #ℂall #Girl Service ❤85270-49040❤ Surat #ℂall #GirlsFor Better Surat #ℂall #Girl Service ❤85270-49040❤ Surat #ℂall #Girls
For Better Surat #ℂall #Girl Service ❤85270-49040❤ Surat #ℂall #Girls
Savita Shen $i11
 
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists  Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Saeid Safari
 
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...
Oleg Kshivets
 
Superficial & Deep Fascia of the NECK.pptx
Superficial & Deep Fascia of the NECK.pptxSuperficial & Deep Fascia of the NECK.pptx
Superficial & Deep Fascia of the NECK.pptx
Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore
 
Ophthalmology Clinical Tests for OSCE exam
Ophthalmology Clinical Tests for OSCE examOphthalmology Clinical Tests for OSCE exam
Ophthalmology Clinical Tests for OSCE exam
KafrELShiekh University
 
BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA.BPH. BPHpdf
BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA.BPH. BPHpdfBENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA.BPH. BPHpdf
BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA.BPH. BPHpdf
DR SETH JOTHAM
 
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Sujoy Dasgupta
 

Recently uploaded (20)

TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...
 
Alcohol_Dr. Jeenal Mistry MD Pharmacology.pdf
Alcohol_Dr. Jeenal Mistry MD Pharmacology.pdfAlcohol_Dr. Jeenal Mistry MD Pharmacology.pdf
Alcohol_Dr. Jeenal Mistry MD Pharmacology.pdf
 
Ocular injury ppt Upendra pal optometrist upums saifai etawah
Ocular injury  ppt  Upendra pal  optometrist upums saifai etawahOcular injury  ppt  Upendra pal  optometrist upums saifai etawah
Ocular injury ppt Upendra pal optometrist upums saifai etawah
 
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptxHow STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
How STIs Influence the Development of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.pptx
 
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.GawadHemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 3, Dialysis Water Unit - Dr.Gawad
 
Surat @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8527049040❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Surat @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8527049040❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model SafeSurat @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8527049040❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Surat @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8527049040❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
 
New Drug Discovery and Development .....
New Drug Discovery and Development .....New Drug Discovery and Development .....
New Drug Discovery and Development .....
 
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdf
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN  HEALTHCARE.pdfARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN  HEALTHCARE.pdf
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdf
 
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of TastePhysiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
Physiology of Special Chemical Sensation of Taste
 
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,
 
Novas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidade
Novas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidadeNovas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidade
Novas diretrizes da OMS para os cuidados perinatais de mais qualidade
 
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness JourneyTom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
Tom Selleck Health: A Comprehensive Look at the Iconic Actor’s Wellness Journey
 
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...
 
For Better Surat #ℂall #Girl Service ❤85270-49040❤ Surat #ℂall #Girls
For Better Surat #ℂall #Girl Service ❤85270-49040❤ Surat #ℂall #GirlsFor Better Surat #ℂall #Girl Service ❤85270-49040❤ Surat #ℂall #Girls
For Better Surat #ℂall #Girl Service ❤85270-49040❤ Surat #ℂall #Girls
 
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists  Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Ozempic: Preoperative Management of Patients on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
 
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...
 
Superficial & Deep Fascia of the NECK.pptx
Superficial & Deep Fascia of the NECK.pptxSuperficial & Deep Fascia of the NECK.pptx
Superficial & Deep Fascia of the NECK.pptx
 
Ophthalmology Clinical Tests for OSCE exam
Ophthalmology Clinical Tests for OSCE examOphthalmology Clinical Tests for OSCE exam
Ophthalmology Clinical Tests for OSCE exam
 
BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA.BPH. BPHpdf
BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA.BPH. BPHpdfBENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA.BPH. BPHpdf
BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA.BPH. BPHpdf
 
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
Couples presenting to the infertility clinic- Do they really have infertility...
 

Rp003 biological effects of ionizing radiation 2

  • 1. BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION H.L.ANIL RANJITH HEAD DIVISION OF RADIATION PROTECTION ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY
  • 2. Module 1.1. Basic concepts
  • 3. • 1895 X-rays discovered by Roentgen • 1896 First skin burns reported • 1896 First use of x-rays in the treatment of cancer • 1896 Becquerel: Discovery of radioactivity • 1897 First cases of skin damage reported • 1902 First report of x-ray induced cancer • 1911 First report of leukaemia in humans and lung cancer from occupational exposure • 1911 94 cases of tumour reported in Germany (50 being radiologists) Early Observations of the Effects of Ionising Radiation
  • 4. Information comes from:  studies of humans (epidemiology)  studies of animals and plants (experimental radiobiology)  fundamental studies of cells and their components (cellular and molecular biology) The key to understanding the health effects of radiation is the interaction between these sources of information Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • 5. CELL • IS THE BASIC UNIT OF LIFE • MAKES ORGANS AND TISSUES • HUMAN BODY CONSISTS OF 1014 SUCH CELLS • BIOLOGICAL TISSUES COMPRIZE OF 70% OF WATER CELL MEMBRANE: CONTROL INTAKE & OUTPUT OF SOLUBLE SUBSTANCE NUCLEAR MEMBRANE NUCLEUS CONTAINS DNA, CHROMOSOME, GENES ETC. CYTOPLASM FLUID LIKE SUBSTANCE THAT CONTAINS MANY SEPARATE CONSTITUENTS
  • 6. DIRECT ACTION ON CELLS • IN DIRECT ACTION,THE SENSITIVE VOLUME OF THE CELL IS AFFECTED BY DIRECT TRANSFER OF ENERGY FROM RADIATION TO THE CELL AND SENSITIVE VOLUME CAN BE INACTIVATED INDIRECT ACTION ON CELLS • IN INDIRECT ACTION, THE SENSITIVE VOLUME OF THE CELL IS INACTIVATED BY TRANSFER OF ENERGY FROM ANOTHER VOLUME THAT HAS ABSORBED ENERGY FROM RADIATION
  • 7. Direct effects Indirect effects Cell death Primary damage Modified cell Damage to organ Somatic cells Germ cells Hereditary effects Cancer Leukemia Death of organism Repair BIOLOGICAL EFFECTSBIOLOGICAL EFFECTS Determinististic effects Stochastic effects
  • 8. Biological Effects of Radiation Deterministic Effects Stochastic Effects Due to large doses of radiation exposure during short period of time Due to large short term doses, or smaller doses received over a long period of time.
  • 9. Deterministic effects (Short term biological effects) Dose Severity .. threshold • lots of cells killed in a given tissue or organ – high dose • cell replacement (if able to happen) will tend to offset cell killing
  • 10. Stochastic effects Long Term Biological Effects (Chronic Radiation Effects) Cancer Hereditary Effects Probability ofeffect Dose • All radiation induced cancers have a long latent period before they are detected. • The shortest latent period is about 5-10 year for Leukemia, and about 20 - 30 years for solid tumors.
  • 11. SOMATIC EFFECTS • ARISE FROM DAMAGE TO CELLS IN A PARTICLLAR TISSUE AND AFFECT ONLY TO THE IRRADIATED PERSON • CAN BE EITHER STOCHASTIC EFFECT OR DETERMINISTIC EFFECT
  • 12. HERIDITORY EFFECTS • OCCUR IN CHILDREN OR FUTURE GENERATIONS OF IRRIDIATED PERSON DUE TO A ALTERED GERM CELL • ARE STOCHASTIC EFFECTS
  • 13. In direct Action on Cells
  • 14. Indirect Actions When water is irradiated with Ionizing radiation, the following reactions take place. H2O H2O+ + e - 1.1 Positive ion dissolves immediately. H2O+ H+ + OH 1.2
  • 15. Electron is picket up by a neutral water molecule. H2O + e- H2O- 1.3 This also dissolves immediately. H2O- H + OH- 1.4 H and OH are free radicals and are highly reactive. (The reactions 1.1 1.4 last only about 10-6 s)
  • 16. The free radicals H & OH may recombine or react with other molecules. If OH radicals are in close proximity, they can recombine to form H2O2 OH + OH H2O2 If irradiated water contains dissolved O2 the following reaction will take place. H + O2 HO2
  • 17. Since this hydroperoxyl radical has longer life time which allows. H + HO2 H2O2 Since H2O2is a relatively stable oxydizing agent, H2O2 can affect molecules or cells .
  • 19. Direct Actions Direct ionization of molecules and atoms of a cell Any part of the cell may be damaged DNA damage is important
  • 20. Biological Effects • At low doses, damage to a cell is a random effect - either there is energy deposition or not.
  • 21. Interaction of ionizing radiation with DNA DIRECT ACTIONDIRECT ACTION INDIRECT ACTIONINDIRECT ACTION
  • 22. Damages to DNA The critical Target of the cell
  • 23. Damages to the DNA Three major types can be discussed. • DNA Base Damage - This is the most common damage to the DNA molecules. - If the cell remain unprepared it can survive and reproduce as a altered cell.
  • 26. Damages to Stands Single strand break. • Braking of a one strand • Can be quickly repaired. Double strand break • Braking of both strands either by single event or two separate event. Single event Two separate event
  • 27. DAMAGE TO THE CELLS BY RADIATION CAN CAUSE: • DELAY IN CELL REPRODUCTION • CHROMOSOME ABERATION • CELL DEATH • GENE MUTATION ETC.
  • 29. DETERMINISTIC EFFECTS • OCCURS DUE TO CELL KILING AND THE PREVENTION OR DELAY OF CELL DIVISION
  • 31. 31 Deterministic effects • Due to cell killing • Have a dose threshold • Specific to particular tissues • Severity of harm is dose dependent Radiation injury from an industrial source
  • 32. Examples for deterministic effects • Skin breakdown • Cataract of the lens of the eye • Sterility • Kidney failure • Acute radiation syndrome (whole body)
  • 33. Skin reactions Injury Threshold Dose to Skin (Sv) Weeks to Onset Early transient erythema 2 <<1 Temporary epilation 3 3 Main erythema 6 1.5 Permanent epilation 7 3 Dry desquamation 10 4 Invasive fibrosis 10 Dermal atrophy 11 >14 Telangiectasis 12 >52 Moist desquamation 15 4 Late erythema 15 6-10 Dermal necrosis 18 >10 Secondary ulceration 20 >6 Skin damage from prolonged fluoroscopic exposure
  • 34. Threshold Doses for Deterministic Effects • Cataracts of the lens of the eye 2-10 Gy • Permanent sterility – males 3.5-6 Gy – females 2.5-6 Gy • Temporary sterility – males 0.15 Gy – females 0.6 Gy dose Severity of effect threshold
  • 35. Note on threshold values • Depend on dose delivery mode: – single high dose most effective – fractionation increases threshold dose in most cases significantly – decreasing the dose rate increases threshold in most cases • Threshold may differ in different persons
  • 36. Threshold doses for deterministic effects Organ doses for adults typically > 50 Gy
  • 37. Absorbed dose (Gy) Syndrome or Tissues involved Symptoms 1 - 2 Bone marrow Mild leucopenia and thrombopenia 2 - 10 Bone marrow syndrome Leucopenia, thrombopenia, hemorrhage, infections 10 - 15 Intestinal syndrome Diarrhoea, fever, electrolytic imbalance > 15 Neurological syndrome Cramps, tremor, ataxia, lethargy, impaired vision, coma Absorbed dose (Gy) Therapy Prognosis Lethality 1 – 2 Symptomatic Excellent 0-10 % 2 – 10 Transfusions of leucocytes and platelets. Bone marrow transplantation. Growth stimulating factors Uncertain 0-90% 10-15 Palliative Very poor 90 - 100 % > 15 Symptomatic Hopeless 100 % Whole body exposureWhole body exposure
  • 38. Radiation induced skin injuries Effect Typical threshold dose (Gy) Fluoroscopic on time (minutes) to reach threshold at a dose rate of 50 mGy per min Fluoroscopic on time (minutes) to reach threshold at a dose rate of 100 mGy per min Time to onset of the effect Early transient erythema 2 40 20 hours Temporary epilation 3 60 30 ~3 weeks Main erythema 6 120 60 ~10 days Permanent epilation 7 140 70 ~3 weeks Dry desquamation 10 200 100 ~4 weeks Invasive fibrosis 10 200 100 ------------ Dermal atrophy 11 220 110 >14 weeks Telangiectasia 12 240 120 >52 weeks Moist desquamation 15 300 150 ~4 weeks Late erythema 15 300 150 ~6-10 weeks Dermal necrosis 18 360 180 >10 weeks Secondary ulceration 20 400 200 >6 weeks
  • 39. RADIOSENSITIVITY High RS Medium RS Low RS Bone Marrow Spleen Thymus Lymphatic nodes Gonads Eye lens Lymphocytes (exception to the RS laws) Skin Mesoderm organs (liver, heart, lungs…) Muscle Bones Nervous system
  • 41. STOCHASTIC EFFECTS • MAY BE DUE TO EITHER A SINGLE LARGE OVER EXPOSURE OR CONTINUING LOW LEVEL OVER EXPOSURE • RESULTS FROM : CHROMOSOME ABERATIONS AND, GENE MUTATIONS
  • 43. Chromosome Aberration and Gene Mutation If the stands broken are not repaired, the end of the breaks can attach to the broken or unbroken chromosomes (healthy ones) and result chromosome aberrations, and gene mutations etc.
  • 44.
  • 45. Stochastic effects • Due to cell changes (DNA) and proliferation towards a malignant disease • Severity (i.e. cancer) independent of the dose • No dose threshold (they are presumed to occur at any dose however small) • Probability of effect increases with dose
  • 46. Cancer Over proliferation of viable cells which have received damages to their control systems in the form of gene mutations or chromosome aberrations.
  • 47. … order of magnitudes • 1cm3 of tissue = 109 cells • 1 mGy --> 1 in 1000 or 106 cells hit • 999 of 1000 lesions are repaired - leaving 103 cells damaged • 999 of 1000 damaged cells die (not a major problem as millions of cells die every day in every person) • 1 cell may live with damage (could be mutated)
  • 48. RADIOSENSITIVITY High RS Medium RS Low RS Bone Marrow Spleen Thymus Lymphatic nodes Gonads Eye lens Lymphocytes (exception to the RS laws) Skin Mesoderm organs (liver, heart, lungs…) Muscle Bones Nervous system
  • 49. SENSITIVE ORGANS TO RADIATION INDUCED CANCERS • Female breast • Lungs • Bone • Thyroid and • Skin • Current best estimate of the fatality risk from radiation induced cancer is 5 per 100 person – Sievert. This means that, if 20000 people were each given 1.0 mSv, one of them may die 20 – 30 years later due to a cancer induced by that dose. However in that population of 20000 people, about 3200 of them would die from normal cancer in 20 – 30 years.
  • 50. Module 1.4. Effects on embryo and fetus
  • 51. Radiation effects on the embryo/foetus • lethal effects • malformations/growth anomalies • mental retardation • cancer – childhood, adulthood • hereditary effects • For a dose of 10 mSv, probability of the above is less than 0.2%, compared with about 6% natural incidence of the same.
  • 52. Effects of Antenatal Exposure • The effects on the embryo/fetus depend on the time of exposure relative to conception. • Lethal effects can be induced in experimental animal by relatively low doses (such as 100 mSv) before or immediately after implantation of the embryo into the uterine wall. • They may also be induced after higher doses during all stages of intra-uterine development. • Exposure of the embryo in the first three weeks following conception is not likely to result in deterministic or stochastic effects in the live-born child, despite the fact that the central nervous system and the heart are beginning to develop in the third week. It is thought that any cellular damage at this stage is much more likely to cause the death of the embryo/fetus than to result in stochastic effects expressed in the live-born.
  • 54. Pre-implant stage (up to 10 days) Only lethal effect, all or none  Embryo contains only few cells which are not specialized  If too many cell are damaged-embryo is resorbed  If only few killed-remaining pluripotent cells replace the cells loss within few cell divisions  Atomic Bomb survivors - high incidence of both - normal birth and spontaneous abortion
  • 55.
  • 56. Effects of Antenatal Exposure Malformation • During the period of major organogenesis, conventionally from the start of the third week after conception, malformations may be caused in the organ under development at time of exposure. These effects are deterministic in character with a threshold in man, estimated from animal experiments, to be about 0.1 Gy. • Throughout the period from 3 weeks after conception until the end of pregnancy, it is likely that radiation exposure can cause stochastic effects resulting in an increased probability of cancer in the live-born. The available data are not consistent and considerable uncertainty exists. However, the ICRP assumes that the nominal fatality probability coefficient is, at most, a few times that for the population as a whole. Irradiated fetus seem to be susceptible to childhood leukemia and other childhood cancers which expressed approximately during the first decade of life.
  • 57. Effects of Antenatal Exposure Loss of Intelligence • Values of intelligence quotient (IQ) lower than expected reported in some children exposed in utero. • Mental retardation was not observed to be induced by radiation prior to 8 weeks from conception ,or after 25 weeeks. The period 8-15 weeks are more sensitive than the period 16-25 weeks. During the most sensitive period, the fraction of those exposed which became severely mentally retarded increased by approximately 0.4 per Sv. During weeks 16-25, it increased by about 0.1 per Sv. • Observed a gneral downward shift in the distribution of IQ with increasing dose. the shift is proportional to dose. Small shifts cannot be clinically identified. A coefficient of about 30 IQ points per Sv relates exposure from 8 weeks to 15 weeks after conception. A similar, but smaller shift, is detectable exposure in the period from 16 weeks to 25 weeks. At doses of the order of 0.1 Sv, no effect would be detectable in the general distribution of IQ, but at somewhat large doses the effect might be sufficient to show an increase in the number of children classified as severely retarded. All the observations on IQ and severe mental retardation relate to high dose.
  • 58. Radiation-Induced Malformations • Malformations have a threshold of 100-200 mGy or higher and are typically associated with central nervous system problems • Fetal doses of 100 mGy are not reached even with 3 pelvic CT scans or 20 conventional diagnostic x-ray examinations • These levels can be reached with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures of the pelvis and with radiotherapy
  • 59. Central Nervous System Effects • During 8-25 weeks post-conception the CNS is particularly sensitive to radiation • Fetal doses in excess of 100 mGy can result in some reduction of IQ (intelligence quotient) • Fetal doses in the range of 1000 mGy can result in severe mental retardation particularly during 8-15 weeks and to a lesser extent at 16-25 weeks
  • 60. Leukemia and Cancer • Radiation has been shown to increase the risk for leukemia and many types of cancer in adults and children • Throughout most of pregnancy, the embryo/fetus is assumed to be at about the same risk for carcinogenic effects as children
  • 61. Leukemia and Cancer • The relative risk may be as high as 1.4 (40% increase over normal incidence) due to a fetal dose of 10 mGy • Individual risk, however, is small with the risk of cancer at ages 0-15 being about 1 excess cancer death per 1,700 children exposed “in utero” to 10 mGy
  • 62. Module 1.5. Risk estimates
  • 63. How do we know about radiation induced cancer? • epidemiological studies – A bomb survivors (Life Span Study) – Medical exposures (eg Ankylosing Spondylitis Study) – Occupational exposures (eg. UK National Register for Radiation Workers) • molecular biology studies
  • 64. Epidemiological studies - features • Large population size – Up to 100 000 • Years of follow-up – Often 30 or more years • Mix of ages, sex, ethnic groups • Setting – War, medical, occupational • Organs irradiated – All, through to specific organs • Dose range – Mainly medium to high • Dose rate – Mainly high
  • 65. Cancer risk estimates • Estimated lifetime fatal cancer risk for the general population with exposure to low LET radiation at high doses and dose rates – ICRP 60 risk estimate – 10% per Sv • It is assumed there is NO threshold • Allowance is made for low doses/dose rates – ICRP 60 used a factor of 2 – 5% per Sv at low doses/dose rates – for workers the risk is assessed at 4% per Sv at low doses/dose rates
  • 66. Lifetime fatal cancer risks - low dose/rate • Risk per 100 person Sv Organ ICRP 26 ICRP 60 Bone marrow 0.20 0.50 Bone surfaces 0.05 0.05 Lung 0.20 0.85 Thyroid 0.05 0.08 Breast 0.25 0.20 Colon 0.85 Oesophagus 0.30 Stomach 1.10 Liver 0.15 Urinary bladder 0.30 Skin 0.02 Ovaries 0.10 Remainder 0.50 0.50 TOTAL 1.25 5.00
  • 67. Hereditary effects of radiation • effects associated with gene mutations and chromosomal aberrations induced in parental germ cells and transmitted to progeny • radiation does not produce new, unique mutations • information for humans is inconclusive - no direct evidence • probability of hereditary effects is proportional to the gonadal dose
  • 68. Hereditary Effects of Radiation • Ionising radiation is known to cause heritable mutations in many plants and animals BUT • intensive studies of 70,000 offspring of the atomic bomb survivors have failed to identify an increase in congenital anomalies, cancer, chromosome aberrations in circulating lymphocytes or mutational blood protein changes.Neel et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1990, 46:1053-1072Neel et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1990, 46:1053-1072
  • 69. Estimating risks of hereditary effects • hereditary effects are stochastic in nature, with the amount of radiation exposure determining the probability of occurrence • current risk estimates for hereditary effects over all generations – 2.4 x 10-2 per Sv - dose to gonads, reproductive pop – 1.0 x 10-2 per Sv - dose to gonads, general pop • A derived figure to assess the risks of occupational exposures – 0.6 x 10-2 per Sv - dose to gonads, worker population
  • 70. HIROSHIMA 1945 : Total Population : 330000 Deaths : 110000 Injured : 80000 NAGASAKI 1945 : Total Population : 210000 Deaths : 70000 Injured : 28000
  • 71. HIROSHIMA 1945 : 70000 new born children 1946 – 1953 showed no genetic effects. (Parents were survivors of Hiroshima or Nagasaki atomic bomb explosion)
  • 72. HIROSHIMA 1945 : No. of monitored pregnancies 1945 / 46 : ca. 2800 No effect : 0 – 8 weeks after 25 weeks
  • 73. HIROSHIMA 1945 : Findings : • Decrease of IQ (foetus exposed) • Delayed growth and development (exposed at young age) • Leukemia
  • 74. STOCHASTIC EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION Thyroid cancer diagnosed up to 1998 among children 0-17 years at the time of the Chernobyl accident 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Year Number Belarus Russian Federation Ukraine Total
  • 75. Comparison of Radiation Worker Risks to Other Workers Mean death rate 1989 (10-6 /y) Trade 40 Manufacture 60 Service 40 Government 90 Transport/utilities 240 Construction 320 Agriculture 400 Mines/quarries 430 Safe industries ≡ 2 mSv/y (100 mSv over a lifetime) ≡ max permissible exposuremax permissible exposure (20 mSv/year or 1000 mSv(20 mSv/year or 1000 mSv over a lifetimeover a lifetime
  • 76. The following activities are associated with a risk of death that is 1/1000000 •10 days work in a nuclear medicine department • smoking 1.4 cigarette • living 2 days in a polluted city • traveling 6 min in a canoe • 1.5 min mountaineering • traveling 480 km in a car • traveling 1600 km in an airplane • living 2 months together with a smoker • drinking 30 cans of diet soda RISKS
  • 77. In Perspective • Loss of Life in Days – Unmarried Male – 3500 (~10 yr) – Unmarried Female – 2250 (~5 yr) – Smoking(1 pk/day) – 2250 (~ 7 yr) – 25% Overweight – 777 (~ 2 yr) – Alcohol Consumption – 465 (~ 1 yr) – Driving a motor vehicle - 207 – Radiation (1 mSv/yr for 70 years) - 10

Editor's Notes

  1. This slide can be used with a powerpoint effect - each mouseclick will bring up one event. Alternatively, the effect can be turned off.
  2. The fisure illustrates the concept of threshold dose. The threshold dose is the absorbed dose that is needed to create a clinically observed injury in the most rediosensitive individual. Example of threshold doses are given. The magnitude of these doses should be discussed. Give some example illutrating high dose rate activities in medicine e.g. Handling unshielded radioactive material etc.
  3. Note also tumor cure is in this context a deterministic effect
  4. This slide is useful to recap the concept of deterministic effects. Below a certain threshold there is no effect and beyond the threshold the effect becomes noticeable. There can be an increase in severity of the effect with dose, however, the notion of risk is not really applicable to deterministic effects. When discussing threshold values it is important to state the points given on the next slide.
  5. The second point can be compared to drug effects
  6. These are obviously only rough estimates - however they may illustrate the magnitude of the problem. It could be pointed out that 1mGy is of the order of magnitude of the annual exposure of humans. Therefore the whole discussion above could be made for 1 year of life.
  7. The diagram gives the number of thyroid cancers diagnosed in children 0-17 y the years following the Chernobyl accident. The various frequencies for the different regions is related to the exposure of the populations due to the fallout.