SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Using Geophysics to 
Characterize 
the Subsurface: 
“The Principles” 
BERAN GÜRLEME 
OCAK/2011
Using Geophysics to Characterize 
the Subsurface: The Principles
Using Geophysics to Characterize 
the Subsurface: The Principles
We determine subsurface conditions by remotely sensing physical 
properties of materials in situ.
There are basically four modes (or “phases”) used in 
seismic and radar investigations.
a) Vertical reflection 
b) Wide angle reflection 
c) Critical refraction 
d) Direct wave
The seismic 
method 
records these 
signals and 
analyses their 
relationship.
To do so, we need to 
precisely determine 
their arrival times, or 
“traveltimes”.
To do so, we need to 
precisely determine 
their arrival times, or 
“traveltimes”.
To do so, we need to 
precisely determine 
their arrival times, or 
“traveltimes”.
These relative traveltimes are 
the basis for interpreting 
seismic data.
An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets. 
“Picking” traveltimes (or “first 
breaks”) is sometimes a 
subjective art form.
An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets. 
How do these look ?
An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets. 
The traveltime of a phase corresponds to the relative time 
between its “first break” and the launch of the signal.
Seismic Sources !!
The transmitted chirp is cross-correlated 
with the composite signal received at the 
geophones to detect specific reflections, 
refractions, etc. 
Size varies: 
• One person vibrators or compactors; 
• Articulated earth movers.
(U British Columbia: 
(University of Bergen.) Lithoprobe Project.) 
(Network for Earthquake Engineering 
Simulation; U Texas.)
Vibrating type sources
Implementing the Seismic Method.
Consider a two layered earth model.
Principal instruments.
Add an operator.
A “Shot”.
A sound pulse is generated.
And recorded.
And . . .
. . . a reflection is generated.
And recorded.
To summarize: An impulsive source (a sledge hammer blow to a steel 
plate) generates a sound wave that travels through the subsurface. . . .
. . . If one knows the distance (x) between the “shot” and the sensor, and 
the time (T) it takes the wave to travel this distance, . . .
. . . one can determine the velocity (V) of the material, 
V = x / T 
and tell, for example, . . .
. . . whether the medium is 
bedrock, 
dry soil, or 
saturated soil, 
among other possibilities.
In this way, we determine the material properties of the subsurface.
Alternatively, if one knows the velocity (V) of the material and the 
time (T) it takes the wave to get to a sensor, then rearranging 
V = x / T 
. . .
. . . to the form 
x = V / T , 
one can determine the distance (x) from the shot to the sensor.
While not particularly useful for the case above, . . .
. . . the latter concept is critical for determining the 
nature of structures at depth below the surface. 
For example, when there are layers at depth.
Determining the depth when V and T are known is the 
principle of the reflection method.
Theory: Behavior of Waves in the Subsurface 
In order to understand how to extract more detailed 
subsurface information from geophysical measurements at the 
surface, we first analyze the behavior of waves (seismic or 
radar) in the subsurface.
This is the field situation to be considered.
Please review the animation sequence for 
Reflected Phases at this time. 
Please minimize this application, the animation 
sequence is found on the index page. 
Maximize this application when ready to continue.
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and 
‘reflected’ phases as offset increases.
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and 
‘reflected’ phases as offset increases. 
2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower 
interface.
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and 
‘reflected’ phases as offset increases. 
2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower 
interface. 
3) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the two 
phases along the surface 
a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1. 
b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin θ i 
(where θ i is the incident angle).
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and 
‘reflected’ phases as offset increases. 
2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower 
interface. 
3) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the two 
phases along the surface 
a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1. 
b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin θ i 
(where θ i is the incident angle).
Traveltime Relations for Direct and 
Reflected Phases
The field situation.
The field situation showing cutaway.
The field situation with geophone.
Direct and reflected ray paths.
How can we use the ‘reflected’ phase to 
determine the depth to the respective 
horizon (or layer) ?
Geometry for a reflection.
Traveltime for a reflection.
If we “know” x and v, we can determine d, the 
depth to the reflector.
Direct and reflected ray paths with traveltimes.
Please review tutorial on Analyzing Direct and 
Reflected Phases at this time. 
Please minimize this application, the tutorial is 
found on the index page. 
Maximize this application when ready to continue.
Next, consider the ‘refracted’ phase.
Snell’s Law for Reflection and Refraction.
Refraction at the Critical Angle.
Please review the animation sequence for 
Refracted Phases at this time. 
Please minimize this application, the animation 
sequence is found on the index page. 
Maximize this application when ready to continue.
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, 
‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases.
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, 
‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases. 
2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along 
the lower interface.
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, 
‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases. 
2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along 
the lower interface. 
3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected 
wavefront at the critical angle.
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, 
‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases. 
2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along 
the lower interface. 
3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected 
wavefront at the critical angle. 
4) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the three 
phases along the surface 
a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1. 
b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin θ i 
(where θ i is the incident angle). 
c) The refracted wave @ v2 = v1 / sin θ c 
(where θ c is the ’critical’ angle).
Essential points for discussion. 
1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, 
‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases. 
2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along 
the lower interface. 
3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected 
wavefront at the critical angle. 
4) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the three 
phases along the surface 
a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1. 
b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin θ i 
(where θ i is the incident angle). 
c) The refracted wave @ v2 = v1 / sin θ c 
(where θ c is the ’critical’ angle).
Refraction at the Critical Angle.
In summary: A seismic (or radar) signal generates a number 
of modes.
How can we use the ‘refracted’ phase 
to determine structure in the earth ?
Recall the direct and reflected ray paths.
The direct and refracted ray paths.
Composite of direct, reflected and refracted 
ray paths.
Set of synthetic 
seismograms.
Details on “Picking” and Interpreting 
Seismic Data
Set of synthetic 
seismograms. 
(Direct phase.)
(Direct wave 
“picks” are best in 
here.)
Analysis of direct 
ground wave.
Direct ground 
wave traveltime 
should (?) go 
through origin.
Set of synthetic 
seismograms. 
(Reflected phase.)
Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative 
expression for the traveltime.
Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative 
expression for the traveltime.
Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative 
expression for the traveltime. 
The slope m, and the intercept b, provide the 
essential parameters for interpretation.
Analysis of 
reflected phase 
using T2 - X2 
method.
Set of synthetic 
seismograms. 
(Refracted phase.)
Analysis of critically 
refracted phase.
Traveltime relations.
Actual 
seismogram 
showing various 
phases.
Picking 
“first breaks” 
(Continue).
To get truly good “first break” picks, you need to 
a) Turn up the gain; 
b) Adjust “events” to common amplitude. 
(This is because low amplitude picks tend to 
be biased to later times.) 
Picking 
“first breaks” 
(Continue).
Using the refraction method for more 
complicated field situations.
Consider “dipping” interfaces.
Consider “dipping” interfaces. 
We employ “reversed” refraction profiling.
Procedure: Step 1; The “Forward” Shot.
Procedure: Step 2; The “Reverse” Shot.
We use the theoretical traveltime of the respective 
refracted phases. 
September 1, 2002
The Theoretical Traveltime for a Refracted Phase 
on a Dipping Interface.
Summary of apparent velocities and intercept 
times for a dipping interface.
How do we gather and interpret field data ?
Procedure: Step 1; The “Forward” Shot.
Step 1: Shoot in Forward Direction.
Procedure: Step 2; The “Reverse” Shot.
Step 2: Shoot in Reverse Direction.
Step 3: Inspect Data.
Step 4: Determine Forward Velocity.
Step 5: Determine Reverse Velocity.
Step 6: Determine Forward Intercept.
Step 7: Determine Reverse Intercept.
Step 7: Determine Reverse Intercept. 
It is critical to remember that the 
“reciprocal traveltimes” are identical.
Traveltime relations: Dipping refractor.
Some Examples.
An actual interpretation of 
dipping plane interfaces 
(J. Sullivan; Seekonk, MA).
Characteristics of Field Area 1: Vertical GPR Time Section 
Ground Penetrating Radar Image from Field Site 
Freq:100 MHz 
Tx-Rx Offset: 2 m
Example of a refined interpretation using a 
combination of seismic refraction methods 
and ground penetrating radar.
Subsurface structure above bedrock at field site. 
[Seismic interpretation from Jeff 
Sullivan (personal communication.).] 
Composite interpretation using seismic 
refraction, DC resistivity, EM, GPR and gravity.
Example of refraction study: Palmer River Basin.
In summary, a seismic interpretation depends on properly 
identifying and time-picking appropriate phases.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets. 
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets. 
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". 
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets. 
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". 
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. 
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets. 
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". 
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. 
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. 
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot 
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as 
a delay time analysis.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets. 
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". 
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. 
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. 
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot 
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as 
a delay time analysis. 
• Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets. 
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". 
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. 
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. 
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot 
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as 
a delay time analysis. 
• Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms. 
• Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor 
in three dimensions.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets. 
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". 
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. 
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. 
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot 
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as 
a delay time analysis. 
• Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms. 
• Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor 
in three dimensions.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys 
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) 
• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz 
geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. 
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer 
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the 
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set 
of shot point-geophone offsets. 
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". 
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. 
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. 
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot 
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as 
a delay time analysis. 
• Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms. 
• Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor 
in three dimensions.
Each of these wave modes (or ‘phases’) provide useful, oftentimes 
essential, information on the subsurface 
In addition, strong analogies exist between 
• Seismic (acoustic or mechanical) phenomena and 
• Ground penetrating radar (electromagnetic) signals.
End of Presentation… 
Thanks for Listen...

More Related Content

What's hot

2 D 3D_ seismic survey
2 D 3D_ seismic survey2 D 3D_ seismic survey
2 D 3D_ seismic survey
Shah Naseer
 
2 d and 3d land seismic data acquisition and seismic data processing
2 d and 3d land seismic data acquisition and seismic data processing2 d and 3d land seismic data acquisition and seismic data processing
2 d and 3d land seismic data acquisition and seismic data processing
Ali Mahroug
 
Geophysical prospecting
Geophysical prospecting Geophysical prospecting
Geophysical prospecting Spondan Bora
 
Geophysics (definition,scope and applications)
Geophysics (definition,scope and applications)Geophysics (definition,scope and applications)
Geophysics (definition,scope and applications)
Tahsin Islam Ornee
 
Seismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction SurveyingSeismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction SurveyingAli Osman Öncel
 
Introduction to Seismic Method
Introduction to Seismic Method Introduction to Seismic Method
Introduction to Seismic Method
Ahmed Younhais Tariq
 
Seismic acquisition survey
Seismic acquisition survey Seismic acquisition survey
Seismic acquisition survey
Shah Naseer
 
Seismic Reflection
Seismic ReflectionSeismic Reflection
Seismic Reflection
Sevar Dilkhaz
 
Seismic interpretation and well logging techniques
Seismic interpretation and well logging techniquesSeismic interpretation and well logging techniques
Seismic interpretation and well logging techniques
Pramoda Raj
 
Magnetic prospecting
Magnetic prospectingMagnetic prospecting
Magnetic prospecting
Pramoda Raj
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
University of Kerala
 
Introduction to seismic interpretation
Introduction to seismic interpretationIntroduction to seismic interpretation
Introduction to seismic interpretation
Amir I. Abdelaziz
 
Magnetic Survey
Magnetic SurveyMagnetic Survey
Magnetic Survey
SudhanKumarSubedi
 
Geophysical methods
Geophysical methodsGeophysical methods
Geophysical methods
Fands-llc
 
3D Facies Modeling
3D Facies Modeling3D Facies Modeling
3D Facies Modeling
Marc Diviu Franco
 
Gravity Method
Gravity MethodGravity Method
Gravity Method
Tahsin Islam Ornee
 
The Value Proposition of 3D and 4D Marine Seismic Data
The Value Proposition of 3D and 4D Marine Seismic DataThe Value Proposition of 3D and 4D Marine Seismic Data
The Value Proposition of 3D and 4D Marine Seismic Data
Taylor Goss
 
Borehole Seismic Solutions for Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Moni...
Borehole Seismic Solutions for Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Moni...Borehole Seismic Solutions for Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Moni...
Borehole Seismic Solutions for Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Moni...
Society of Petroleum Engineers
 

What's hot (20)

2 D 3D_ seismic survey
2 D 3D_ seismic survey2 D 3D_ seismic survey
2 D 3D_ seismic survey
 
2 d and 3d land seismic data acquisition and seismic data processing
2 d and 3d land seismic data acquisition and seismic data processing2 d and 3d land seismic data acquisition and seismic data processing
2 d and 3d land seismic data acquisition and seismic data processing
 
Geophysical prospecting
Geophysical prospecting Geophysical prospecting
Geophysical prospecting
 
Geophysics (definition,scope and applications)
Geophysics (definition,scope and applications)Geophysics (definition,scope and applications)
Geophysics (definition,scope and applications)
 
Seismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction SurveyingSeismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction Surveying
 
Survey design
Survey designSurvey design
Survey design
 
Introduction to Seismic Method
Introduction to Seismic Method Introduction to Seismic Method
Introduction to Seismic Method
 
Seismic acquisition survey
Seismic acquisition survey Seismic acquisition survey
Seismic acquisition survey
 
Seismic Reflection
Seismic ReflectionSeismic Reflection
Seismic Reflection
 
Seismic interpretation and well logging techniques
Seismic interpretation and well logging techniquesSeismic interpretation and well logging techniques
Seismic interpretation and well logging techniques
 
Magnetic prospecting
Magnetic prospectingMagnetic prospecting
Magnetic prospecting
 
Well logging
Well loggingWell logging
Well logging
 
Introduction to seismic interpretation
Introduction to seismic interpretationIntroduction to seismic interpretation
Introduction to seismic interpretation
 
Magnetic Survey
Magnetic SurveyMagnetic Survey
Magnetic Survey
 
Geophysical methods
Geophysical methodsGeophysical methods
Geophysical methods
 
3D Facies Modeling
3D Facies Modeling3D Facies Modeling
3D Facies Modeling
 
Gravity Method
Gravity MethodGravity Method
Gravity Method
 
The Value Proposition of 3D and 4D Marine Seismic Data
The Value Proposition of 3D and 4D Marine Seismic DataThe Value Proposition of 3D and 4D Marine Seismic Data
The Value Proposition of 3D and 4D Marine Seismic Data
 
SP Log
SP Log SP Log
SP Log
 
Borehole Seismic Solutions for Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Moni...
Borehole Seismic Solutions for Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Moni...Borehole Seismic Solutions for Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Moni...
Borehole Seismic Solutions for Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Moni...
 

Similar to Introduction to Seismic Method

Seismic data processing 13 stacking&migration
Seismic data processing 13 stacking&migrationSeismic data processing 13 stacking&migration
Seismic data processing 13 stacking&migration
Amin khalil
 
Від побудови сейсмічних зображень до інверсії
Від побудови сейсмічних зображень до інверсіїВід побудови сейсмічних зображень до інверсії
Від побудови сейсмічних зображень до інверсії
Sergey Starokadomsky
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
Ali Osman Öncel
 
Ultasonic testing
Ultasonic testingUltasonic testing
Ultasonic testing
DENNY OTTARACKAL
 
Principles of seismic data processing m.m.badawy
Principles of seismic data processing m.m.badawyPrinciples of seismic data processing m.m.badawy
Principles of seismic data processing m.m.badawy
Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Egypt
 
Classical and Quantum Theory of light.pdf
Classical and Quantum Theory of light.pdfClassical and Quantum Theory of light.pdf
Classical and Quantum Theory of light.pdf
Filimon Hadish
 
Geophysical data analysis
Geophysical data analysis Geophysical data analysis
Geophysical data analysis
Amir I. Abdelaziz
 
Reflection Seismology Overview
Reflection Seismology OverviewReflection Seismology Overview
Reflection Seismology OverviewAli Osman Öncel
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
Ali Osman Öncel
 
Seismic attribute analysis using complex trace analysis
Seismic attribute analysis using complex trace analysisSeismic attribute analysis using complex trace analysis
Seismic attribute analysis using complex trace analysis
Somak Hajra
 
Lect 10 Signal noice-1.pptx
Lect 10 Signal noice-1.pptxLect 10 Signal noice-1.pptx
Lect 10 Signal noice-1.pptx
MuhammadHammad642906
 
PITFALLS IN 3-D SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
PITFALLS IN 3-D SEISMIC INTERPRETATION PITFALLS IN 3-D SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
PITFALLS IN 3-D SEISMIC INTERPRETATION Debabrata Majumder
 
ECE341Notes_2_TravelingWaves_Fall18.pptx
ECE341Notes_2_TravelingWaves_Fall18.pptxECE341Notes_2_TravelingWaves_Fall18.pptx
ECE341Notes_2_TravelingWaves_Fall18.pptx
MithileshSingh871737
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
Ali Osman Öncel
 
Principles of seismic data interpretation m.m.badawy
Principles of seismic data interpretation   m.m.badawyPrinciples of seismic data interpretation   m.m.badawy
Principles of seismic data interpretation m.m.badawy
Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Egypt
 

Similar to Introduction to Seismic Method (20)

Shearwaves2
Shearwaves2Shearwaves2
Shearwaves2
 
Seismic data processing 13 stacking&migration
Seismic data processing 13 stacking&migrationSeismic data processing 13 stacking&migration
Seismic data processing 13 stacking&migration
 
Від побудови сейсмічних зображень до інверсії
Від побудови сейсмічних зображень до інверсіїВід побудови сейсмічних зображень до інверсії
Від побудови сейсмічних зображень до інверсії
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
 
Ultasonic testing
Ultasonic testingUltasonic testing
Ultasonic testing
 
Principles of seismic data processing m.m.badawy
Principles of seismic data processing m.m.badawyPrinciples of seismic data processing m.m.badawy
Principles of seismic data processing m.m.badawy
 
Classical and Quantum Theory of light.pdf
Classical and Quantum Theory of light.pdfClassical and Quantum Theory of light.pdf
Classical and Quantum Theory of light.pdf
 
Geophysical data analysis
Geophysical data analysis Geophysical data analysis
Geophysical data analysis
 
ThesisFinal2
ThesisFinal2ThesisFinal2
ThesisFinal2
 
Reflection Seismology Overview
Reflection Seismology OverviewReflection Seismology Overview
Reflection Seismology Overview
 
Seismic Methods
Seismic MethodsSeismic Methods
Seismic Methods
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
 
Seismic attribute analysis using complex trace analysis
Seismic attribute analysis using complex trace analysisSeismic attribute analysis using complex trace analysis
Seismic attribute analysis using complex trace analysis
 
Lect 10 Signal noice-1.pptx
Lect 10 Signal noice-1.pptxLect 10 Signal noice-1.pptx
Lect 10 Signal noice-1.pptx
 
PITFALLS IN 3-D SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
PITFALLS IN 3-D SEISMIC INTERPRETATION PITFALLS IN 3-D SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
PITFALLS IN 3-D SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
 
Seismic Instrumentation
Seismic InstrumentationSeismic Instrumentation
Seismic Instrumentation
 
Seismic Instrumentation
Seismic InstrumentationSeismic Instrumentation
Seismic Instrumentation
 
ECE341Notes_2_TravelingWaves_Fall18.pptx
ECE341Notes_2_TravelingWaves_Fall18.pptxECE341Notes_2_TravelingWaves_Fall18.pptx
ECE341Notes_2_TravelingWaves_Fall18.pptx
 
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICSÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
ÖNCEL AKADEMİ: INTRODUCTION TO GEOPHYSICS
 
Principles of seismic data interpretation m.m.badawy
Principles of seismic data interpretation   m.m.badawyPrinciples of seismic data interpretation   m.m.badawy
Principles of seismic data interpretation m.m.badawy
 

More from Şarlatan Avcısı

Yeralti Kirlilik Tespitinde GPR ve DES Yöntemlerinin Kullanımı
Yeralti Kirlilik Tespitinde   GPR ve DES Yöntemlerinin KullanımıYeralti Kirlilik Tespitinde   GPR ve DES Yöntemlerinin Kullanımı
Yeralti Kirlilik Tespitinde GPR ve DES Yöntemlerinin Kullanımı
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
SECRET OF TSUNAMI WAVES
SECRET OF TSUNAMI WAVESSECRET OF TSUNAMI WAVES
SECRET OF TSUNAMI WAVES
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Maden Kanunu
Maden KanunuMaden Kanunu
Maden Kanunu
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Levha Tektoni̇ği̇ ve Magmati̇zma
Levha Tektoni̇ği̇ ve Magmati̇zmaLevha Tektoni̇ği̇ ve Magmati̇zma
Levha Tektoni̇ği̇ ve Magmati̇zma
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Madenciliğin i̇nsan üstündeki Etkileri
Madenciliğin i̇nsan üstündeki EtkileriMadenciliğin i̇nsan üstündeki Etkileri
Madenciliğin i̇nsan üstündeki Etkileri
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
DÜŞEY ELEKTRİK SONDAJ VERİLERİNİN ABAKLAR YARDIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
DÜŞEY ELEKTRİK SONDAJ VERİLERİNİN ABAKLAR YARDIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİDÜŞEY ELEKTRİK SONDAJ VERİLERİNİN ABAKLAR YARDIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
DÜŞEY ELEKTRİK SONDAJ VERİLERİNİN ABAKLAR YARDIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Yer Radarı (GPR)
Yer Radarı (GPR)Yer Radarı (GPR)
Yer Radarı (GPR)
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Yer Manyetigine Giris
Yer Manyetigine GirisYer Manyetigine Giris
Yer Manyetigine Giris
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Manyetik aletler 02
Manyetik aletler 02Manyetik aletler 02
Manyetik aletler 02
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Manyetik Aletler 01
Manyetik Aletler 01Manyetik Aletler 01
Manyetik Aletler 01
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Etik Sorunsalı
Etik SorunsalıEtik Sorunsalı
Etik Sorunsalı
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Maden Aramalarında Gravite yöntem
Maden Aramalarında Gravite yöntemMaden Aramalarında Gravite yöntem
Maden Aramalarında Gravite yöntem
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Filtre Tasarımı ve Temel Filtreler
Filtre Tasarımı ve Temel FiltrelerFiltre Tasarımı ve Temel Filtreler
Filtre Tasarımı ve Temel Filtreler
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Fault Tectonics of the NE Black Sea Shelf and Its Relevance to Hydrocarbon Po...
Fault Tectonics of the NE Black Sea Shelf and Its Relevance to Hydrocarbon Po...Fault Tectonics of the NE Black Sea Shelf and Its Relevance to Hydrocarbon Po...
Fault Tectonics of the NE Black Sea Shelf and Its Relevance to Hydrocarbon Po...
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Self Potansiyel Yöntemi(Düz çözüm/ters çözüm)
Self Potansiyel Yöntemi(Düz çözüm/ters çözüm)Self Potansiyel Yöntemi(Düz çözüm/ters çözüm)
Self Potansiyel Yöntemi(Düz çözüm/ters çözüm)
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Venedik
VenedikVenedik
Elektrik Tomografi
Elektrik TomografiElektrik Tomografi
Elektrik Tomografi
Şarlatan Avcısı
 
Abak Değerlendirme
Abak DeğerlendirmeAbak Değerlendirme
Abak Değerlendirme
Şarlatan Avcısı
 

More from Şarlatan Avcısı (20)

Yeralti Kirlilik Tespitinde GPR ve DES Yöntemlerinin Kullanımı
Yeralti Kirlilik Tespitinde   GPR ve DES Yöntemlerinin KullanımıYeralti Kirlilik Tespitinde   GPR ve DES Yöntemlerinin Kullanımı
Yeralti Kirlilik Tespitinde GPR ve DES Yöntemlerinin Kullanımı
 
SECRET OF TSUNAMI WAVES
SECRET OF TSUNAMI WAVESSECRET OF TSUNAMI WAVES
SECRET OF TSUNAMI WAVES
 
Maden Kanunu
Maden KanunuMaden Kanunu
Maden Kanunu
 
Levha Tektoni̇ği̇ ve Magmati̇zma
Levha Tektoni̇ği̇ ve Magmati̇zmaLevha Tektoni̇ği̇ ve Magmati̇zma
Levha Tektoni̇ği̇ ve Magmati̇zma
 
Madenciliğin i̇nsan üstündeki Etkileri
Madenciliğin i̇nsan üstündeki EtkileriMadenciliğin i̇nsan üstündeki Etkileri
Madenciliğin i̇nsan üstündeki Etkileri
 
DÜŞEY ELEKTRİK SONDAJ VERİLERİNİN ABAKLAR YARDIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
DÜŞEY ELEKTRİK SONDAJ VERİLERİNİN ABAKLAR YARDIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİDÜŞEY ELEKTRİK SONDAJ VERİLERİNİN ABAKLAR YARDIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
DÜŞEY ELEKTRİK SONDAJ VERİLERİNİN ABAKLAR YARDIMIYLA DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
 
Yer Radarı (GPR)
Yer Radarı (GPR)Yer Radarı (GPR)
Yer Radarı (GPR)
 
Yer Manyetigine Giris
Yer Manyetigine GirisYer Manyetigine Giris
Yer Manyetigine Giris
 
Manyetik aletler 02
Manyetik aletler 02Manyetik aletler 02
Manyetik aletler 02
 
Manyetik Aletler 01
Manyetik Aletler 01Manyetik Aletler 01
Manyetik Aletler 01
 
Etik Sorunsalı
Etik SorunsalıEtik Sorunsalı
Etik Sorunsalı
 
Maden Aramalarında Gravite yöntem
Maden Aramalarında Gravite yöntemMaden Aramalarında Gravite yöntem
Maden Aramalarında Gravite yöntem
 
Plate Tectonics
Plate TectonicsPlate Tectonics
Plate Tectonics
 
Filtre Tasarımı ve Temel Filtreler
Filtre Tasarımı ve Temel FiltrelerFiltre Tasarımı ve Temel Filtreler
Filtre Tasarımı ve Temel Filtreler
 
Fault Tectonics of the NE Black Sea Shelf and Its Relevance to Hydrocarbon Po...
Fault Tectonics of the NE Black Sea Shelf and Its Relevance to Hydrocarbon Po...Fault Tectonics of the NE Black Sea Shelf and Its Relevance to Hydrocarbon Po...
Fault Tectonics of the NE Black Sea Shelf and Its Relevance to Hydrocarbon Po...
 
Self Potansiyel Yöntemi(Düz çözüm/ters çözüm)
Self Potansiyel Yöntemi(Düz çözüm/ters çözüm)Self Potansiyel Yöntemi(Düz çözüm/ters çözüm)
Self Potansiyel Yöntemi(Düz çözüm/ters çözüm)
 
Elektromanyetik Prospeksiyon
Elektromanyetik ProspeksiyonElektromanyetik Prospeksiyon
Elektromanyetik Prospeksiyon
 
Venedik
VenedikVenedik
Venedik
 
Elektrik Tomografi
Elektrik TomografiElektrik Tomografi
Elektrik Tomografi
 
Abak Değerlendirme
Abak DeğerlendirmeAbak Değerlendirme
Abak Değerlendirme
 

Introduction to Seismic Method

  • 1. Using Geophysics to Characterize the Subsurface: “The Principles” BERAN GÜRLEME OCAK/2011
  • 2. Using Geophysics to Characterize the Subsurface: The Principles
  • 3. Using Geophysics to Characterize the Subsurface: The Principles
  • 4.
  • 5. We determine subsurface conditions by remotely sensing physical properties of materials in situ.
  • 6. There are basically four modes (or “phases”) used in seismic and radar investigations.
  • 7. a) Vertical reflection b) Wide angle reflection c) Critical refraction d) Direct wave
  • 8. The seismic method records these signals and analyses their relationship.
  • 9. To do so, we need to precisely determine their arrival times, or “traveltimes”.
  • 10. To do so, we need to precisely determine their arrival times, or “traveltimes”.
  • 11. To do so, we need to precisely determine their arrival times, or “traveltimes”.
  • 12. These relative traveltimes are the basis for interpreting seismic data.
  • 13. An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets. “Picking” traveltimes (or “first breaks”) is sometimes a subjective art form.
  • 14. An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets. How do these look ?
  • 15. An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets. The traveltime of a phase corresponds to the relative time between its “first break” and the launch of the signal.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 19.
  • 20. The transmitted chirp is cross-correlated with the composite signal received at the geophones to detect specific reflections, refractions, etc. Size varies: • One person vibrators or compactors; • Articulated earth movers.
  • 21. (U British Columbia: (University of Bergen.) Lithoprobe Project.) (Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation; U Texas.)
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 27. Consider a two layered earth model.
  • 31. A sound pulse is generated.
  • 33. And . . .
  • 34. . . . a reflection is generated.
  • 36. To summarize: An impulsive source (a sledge hammer blow to a steel plate) generates a sound wave that travels through the subsurface. . . .
  • 37. . . . If one knows the distance (x) between the “shot” and the sensor, and the time (T) it takes the wave to travel this distance, . . .
  • 38. . . . one can determine the velocity (V) of the material, V = x / T and tell, for example, . . .
  • 39. . . . whether the medium is bedrock, dry soil, or saturated soil, among other possibilities.
  • 40. In this way, we determine the material properties of the subsurface.
  • 41. Alternatively, if one knows the velocity (V) of the material and the time (T) it takes the wave to get to a sensor, then rearranging V = x / T . . .
  • 42. . . . to the form x = V / T , one can determine the distance (x) from the shot to the sensor.
  • 43. While not particularly useful for the case above, . . .
  • 44. . . . the latter concept is critical for determining the nature of structures at depth below the surface. For example, when there are layers at depth.
  • 45. Determining the depth when V and T are known is the principle of the reflection method.
  • 46. Theory: Behavior of Waves in the Subsurface In order to understand how to extract more detailed subsurface information from geophysical measurements at the surface, we first analyze the behavior of waves (seismic or radar) in the subsurface.
  • 47.
  • 48. This is the field situation to be considered.
  • 49. Please review the animation sequence for Reflected Phases at this time. Please minimize this application, the animation sequence is found on the index page. Maximize this application when ready to continue.
  • 50. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and ‘reflected’ phases as offset increases.
  • 51. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and ‘reflected’ phases as offset increases. 2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower interface.
  • 52. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and ‘reflected’ phases as offset increases. 2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower interface. 3) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the two phases along the surface a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1. b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin θ i (where θ i is the incident angle).
  • 53. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and ‘reflected’ phases as offset increases. 2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower interface. 3) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the two phases along the surface a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1. b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin θ i (where θ i is the incident angle).
  • 54. Traveltime Relations for Direct and Reflected Phases
  • 56. The field situation showing cutaway.
  • 57. The field situation with geophone.
  • 58. Direct and reflected ray paths.
  • 59. How can we use the ‘reflected’ phase to determine the depth to the respective horizon (or layer) ?
  • 60. Geometry for a reflection.
  • 61. Traveltime for a reflection.
  • 62. If we “know” x and v, we can determine d, the depth to the reflector.
  • 63. Direct and reflected ray paths with traveltimes.
  • 64. Please review tutorial on Analyzing Direct and Reflected Phases at this time. Please minimize this application, the tutorial is found on the index page. Maximize this application when ready to continue.
  • 65.
  • 66.
  • 67.
  • 68.
  • 69. Next, consider the ‘refracted’ phase.
  • 70.
  • 71. Snell’s Law for Reflection and Refraction.
  • 72. Refraction at the Critical Angle.
  • 73. Please review the animation sequence for Refracted Phases at this time. Please minimize this application, the animation sequence is found on the index page. Maximize this application when ready to continue.
  • 74. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, ‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases.
  • 75. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, ‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases. 2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along the lower interface.
  • 76. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, ‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases. 2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along the lower interface. 3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected wavefront at the critical angle.
  • 77. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, ‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases. 2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along the lower interface. 3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected wavefront at the critical angle. 4) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the three phases along the surface a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1. b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin θ i (where θ i is the incident angle). c) The refracted wave @ v2 = v1 / sin θ c (where θ c is the ’critical’ angle).
  • 78. Essential points for discussion. 1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’, ‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases. 2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along the lower interface. 3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected wavefront at the critical angle. 4) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the three phases along the surface a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1. b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin θ i (where θ i is the incident angle). c) The refracted wave @ v2 = v1 / sin θ c (where θ c is the ’critical’ angle).
  • 79. Refraction at the Critical Angle.
  • 80.
  • 81.
  • 82. In summary: A seismic (or radar) signal generates a number of modes.
  • 83. How can we use the ‘refracted’ phase to determine structure in the earth ?
  • 84. Recall the direct and reflected ray paths.
  • 85. The direct and refracted ray paths.
  • 86. Composite of direct, reflected and refracted ray paths.
  • 87. Set of synthetic seismograms.
  • 88. Details on “Picking” and Interpreting Seismic Data
  • 89.
  • 90. Set of synthetic seismograms. (Direct phase.)
  • 91. (Direct wave “picks” are best in here.)
  • 92. Analysis of direct ground wave.
  • 93. Direct ground wave traveltime should (?) go through origin.
  • 94.
  • 95. Set of synthetic seismograms. (Reflected phase.)
  • 96. Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative expression for the traveltime.
  • 97. Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative expression for the traveltime.
  • 98. Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative expression for the traveltime. The slope m, and the intercept b, provide the essential parameters for interpretation.
  • 99. Analysis of reflected phase using T2 - X2 method.
  • 100.
  • 101. Set of synthetic seismograms. (Refracted phase.)
  • 102. Analysis of critically refracted phase.
  • 104. Actual seismogram showing various phases.
  • 106. To get truly good “first break” picks, you need to a) Turn up the gain; b) Adjust “events” to common amplitude. (This is because low amplitude picks tend to be biased to later times.) Picking “first breaks” (Continue).
  • 107. Using the refraction method for more complicated field situations.
  • 109. Consider “dipping” interfaces. We employ “reversed” refraction profiling.
  • 110. Procedure: Step 1; The “Forward” Shot.
  • 111. Procedure: Step 2; The “Reverse” Shot.
  • 112. We use the theoretical traveltime of the respective refracted phases. September 1, 2002
  • 113. The Theoretical Traveltime for a Refracted Phase on a Dipping Interface.
  • 114.
  • 115.
  • 116.
  • 117. Summary of apparent velocities and intercept times for a dipping interface.
  • 118. How do we gather and interpret field data ?
  • 119. Procedure: Step 1; The “Forward” Shot.
  • 120. Step 1: Shoot in Forward Direction.
  • 121. Procedure: Step 2; The “Reverse” Shot.
  • 122. Step 2: Shoot in Reverse Direction.
  • 123. Step 3: Inspect Data.
  • 124. Step 4: Determine Forward Velocity.
  • 125. Step 5: Determine Reverse Velocity.
  • 126. Step 6: Determine Forward Intercept.
  • 127. Step 7: Determine Reverse Intercept.
  • 128. Step 7: Determine Reverse Intercept. It is critical to remember that the “reciprocal traveltimes” are identical.
  • 131. An actual interpretation of dipping plane interfaces (J. Sullivan; Seekonk, MA).
  • 132. Characteristics of Field Area 1: Vertical GPR Time Section Ground Penetrating Radar Image from Field Site Freq:100 MHz Tx-Rx Offset: 2 m
  • 133. Example of a refined interpretation using a combination of seismic refraction methods and ground penetrating radar.
  • 134. Subsurface structure above bedrock at field site. [Seismic interpretation from Jeff Sullivan (personal communication.).] Composite interpretation using seismic refraction, DC resistivity, EM, GPR and gravity.
  • 135. Example of refraction study: Palmer River Basin.
  • 136. In summary, a seismic interpretation depends on properly identifying and time-picking appropriate phases.
  • 137. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
  • 138. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets.
  • 139. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets. • Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
  • 140. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets. • Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". • Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.
  • 141. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets. • Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". • Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. • Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan.
  • 142. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets. • Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". • Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. • Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. • Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as a delay time analysis.
  • 143. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets. • Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". • Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. • Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. • Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as a delay time analysis. • Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms.
  • 144. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets. • Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". • Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. • Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. • Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as a delay time analysis. • Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms. • Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor in three dimensions.
  • 145. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets. • Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". • Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. • Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. • Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as a delay time analysis. • Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms. • Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor in three dimensions.
  • 146. Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys (A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.) • Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing. • Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set of shot point-geophone offsets. • Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks". • Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor. • Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan. • Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as a delay time analysis. • Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms. • Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor in three dimensions.
  • 147. Each of these wave modes (or ‘phases’) provide useful, oftentimes essential, information on the subsurface In addition, strong analogies exist between • Seismic (acoustic or mechanical) phenomena and • Ground penetrating radar (electromagnetic) signals.
  • 148. End of Presentation… Thanks for Listen...