This document outlines the requirements for an ethics assignment. Students will research and write about an ethical issue, applying an ethical framework. They must submit an annotated bibliography, reflection, and 6-8 page essay. The essay requires stating a clear thesis, using an ethical theory to analyze the issue while giving evidence and reasoning, and concluding strongly. Groups can also do an annotated bibliography and presentation, following the same standards of a strong argument and research. Plagiarism will result in penalties.
Sources of Research Questions and Formulation of Hypothesis Psychology Pedia
Research Method -
Research questions, Good research questions, Steps to developing a research question, Sources of research question, Research hypothesis, Characteristics of hypothesis
First, follow the guidelines of the two posted outlines Online Net.docxRAJU852744
First, follow the guidelines of the two posted outlines: "Online Netiquette" and "Critical Thinking" for participation in discussion forums located in the content area under the introduction module. Second, choose a journal article related to Freudian's theories and or his psychoanalytical approach to personality, and write a brief summary about the article and post it to this discussion forum. Include the name of the article, the publication information as a reference source, and any quotes from the article, using APA formatting. Third, respond to a peer's posting.
Online Nitiquette:
Check the discussion frequently, respond appropriately, and stay on subject
.
·
Provide a little background
on yourself the first time you enter the discussion. For example, “My name is Mary Peterson, and I am the Program Manager of the Young People of America in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. My question to is…” or, “the most pressing issue my staff faces is…”
·
Personalize
your question or response. Address your message to the person by using his or her name, for example, “Mary, thanks for your suggestions on professional development opportunities for directors.”
·
Be specific
– identify what issue, topic, or specific statement you are asking about/responding to.
·
Focus on one subject
per message. It is hard to answer a question like, “I was wondering what you thought about online learning, the technology tools for online instruction, and what to do about using D2L.” Better to ask a specific question about one of these broad topics to start a “conversation.”
·
Refer to the topic/message
you are replying to by including the topic in your message. For example, “Hi, this is Mary again, I’m following up on the comment that was made by John about the history of distance education.”
·
Invite a response
to your comment by asking another open-ended question. For example, “…so that’s what they do at UWM online. What strategies have worked in other institutions that use online education?”
·
No SHOUTING!
- Capitalize words only to highlight a point or for titles.
·
Be professional
and use care
when interacting online – you don’t have the ability to gauge a person’s reaction or feelings as you do in a face-to-face conversation.
·
Use humor carefully
– it is equally hard to gauge a reaction to your funny comment or aside – and the recipient may misinterpret your attempt to be funny as criticism.
·
Identify your sources
if you use quotes, references, or resources.
·
Keep messages brief
– no more than two or three paragraphs at a time. (Any longer and it becomes difficult to read, so plan your responses before you write them. And shorter messages encourage more people to join in to the discussion.)
·
If you do post a long message, warn other readers
at the beginning that it is lengthy.
·
Never forward someone’s message
to someone else without getting their permission first.
Join in and have fun!
Critical thinking :
Critical Thinking
(Demonstrate evi ...
Critical and Analytical ThinkingCritical thinkin.docxannettsparrow
Critical and Analytical Thinking
Critical thinkingWord ‘critical’ has positive and negative meaningsThe word ‘critical’ in academia describes your attitude when reading an article/chapterBeing critical means weighing up the arguments for and against a particular point.
*
Not just the bad parts
How to think criticallyBe persistent – consider an issue carefully more than onceLook at the evidence for a viewpoint – evaluate it – what are they trying to ‘sell’ me?What are the implications of a view point – is it realistic and rational?Knowing facts and what is right is not what academics is aboutIt is important to identify strengths, satisfactory points and weaknesses when being critical – then you must know why this is soYou should be critical when reading, writing and listening
*
Need to fully understand an argument before you can be critical – be confident
Evaluate=what is the value/effectiveness of something, inc. own opinion and supporting each point with evidence
Question the credibility
You are just assessing ideas not learning the answers
Only want informed opinions
Analytical thinkingBeing analytical mean to look deeper into what is being saidDo not take what you read as ‘given’Evaluate what is being argued – do you agree with it?To be analytical is to question what you read
*
Not just reading what is said but ‘thinking’ about it
How to think analyticallyThink about the view point in relation to the bigger picture – stand backCompare the same issue from the point of other authors – do their views differ?Should be able to see why authors have arrived at different conclusionsYou should be able to argue why you think one set of view points is preferable to anotherYou should be analytical when reading, writing and listening
*
Think about your readings together, put into context
You should be asking why a conclusion has been made – need full understanding for this
Barriers to critical and analytical thinkingBeing critical does not just mean criticiseOur reasoning skills are not objective – we are biased ourselvesReluctance to criticise expertsWanting to know what is right and wrongNot reading deeply enough around a subject – surface knowledge
*
Not always black and white there are lots of grey areas in academics
Being analytical and critical is hard work, you have to read carefully and widely
Critical and analytical readingPrepare for critical reading – skim read the introduction and conclusionFind the conclusions first to help clarify the rest of the readingWhat is the underlying argument/ view point?Question hidden agendas or assumptionsTheory can help fill in the gaps – what is theory?
- set of ideas to explain why something happens and predict outcomes in the futureArguments are often based on theory but an argument is not always a theory
Critical and analytical readingWhere is the evidence for a view point?Check references – are they presented accurately and are they credible? - evaluate that evidence –.
Writing the Term PaperPHIL1120 Environmental EthicsInstr.docxericbrooks84875
Writing the Term Paper
PHIL1120 Environmental Ethics
Instructor Bearden
Fall 2011
Contents:
1. How do I select a topic for a philosophy paper? (1)
2. What is a thesis statement? (2)
3. Using outside sources (4)
4. Possible paper topics (6)
How do I select a topic for a philosophy paper?
All students are expected to write one term paper on a relevant topic in the course that
considers a philosophical position or contemporary environmental issue in detail. Papers
should be 5-6 pages in length, double-spaced, in font size 12 and free from grammatical and
other errors. Papers should show creativity and imagination but should also be written with
clarity and precision. Students will first submit a thesis statement indicating their topic,
proposed argument, and support from philosophical sources. The thesis is worth 5% of the
final grade and is graded on a pass/fail basis. Students will receive comments and guidance
from the instructor regarding their thesis before the paper’s due date. Consult the Course
Schedule for all due dates. Students are warmly encouraged to discuss the paper topic with
the instructor. Please see the instructor if you have further questions or need help during any
phase of the writing process.
The first step in the writing process is picking a topic that interests you. What issues
were you hoping to tackle in this course? What ideas have most impacted the way you think?
What would you like to know more about? Narrowing the field to a few topics is a good start.
From there, consider what readings our book offers on the subject. You are free to write about
any environmental issue, as long as it is considered from a moral point of view. That said,
you might also look into public policy, environmental science, economics or any other
related field. Following your interest is one way to encourage creativity in your papers.
Starting with a question regarding your topic is a good second step. What would you
like to investigate about a particular topic? Consider the scope of your paper and whether or
not there will be conclusive and clear evidence for you to research. Solid papers will argue
for a clear point and will incorporate relevant evidence when applicable. As you settle on
your topic, consider what premises you will need to consider in order to reach a conclusion
on your topic. Think of these premises as the primary support for what your paper aims to
prove. These three premises should help frame your paper, setting the scope of your
investigation. Next, consider how each of these premises logically fit together to help you
address your topic of choice. Try to make these premises fit as precisely as possible. The
more you are able to simplify these premises into a logical argument, the more precise your
paper will be. Obviously, you’ll return to these as you pursue this topic through research. But
you are now on your way to formulating a thesis. For a more detailed discussion of the thesi.
English 112Exploratory Essay AssignmentFor this assignment.docxYASHU40
English 112
Exploratory Essay Assignment
For this assignment, you will not be arguing a particular point of view. Rather, your objective is simply to “wallow in complexity:” to research and analyze, to posit thesis (believing), antithesis(doubting), and synthesis(new ideas/your opinions); to challenge the common ways of looking at a problem.
You will begin this assignment, as much good writing does, by posing a question. Your job is to research a (provisional, or temporary) answer (believing). Then you will critique that answer—by reading against the grain and you will find flaws in the answer (doubting). Then you’ll ask another question—a more complex question, based on your research and your rejection of your previous answer. You will attempt to answer that question, debunk that answer, and so on. The purpose is not to find answers, but to ask really good questions—and as a result to probe a topic more deeply than you’ve ever done before.
This assignment differs from others you’ve most likely written before, as a polished thesis statement does not control the organization and development of ideas. Rather, this essay will document the evolution of your thinking on a subject. The exploratory essay should be a first-person narrative of your thinking and research process as you explore and reflect upon your research question. The essay should reflect the organization plan (pg 49), and it might end with a tentative solution to the problem or answer to the question that you will argue in your subsequent essay. Or, it might conclude with plans for further investigation.**Read the sample essay beginning on page 50 and the notes in the margins for further guidance.
The dialectical thinking I have already asked you to engage in with the researched articles you selected in the past few assignments can and should help you as you compose your exploratory essay. Feel free to use parts of your believing and doubting exercises and your engagement with your articles in your paper.
Consider your audience for this paper to be members of the academic community here at TCC. In this paper, you are developing the authority to speak on the topic of your choice.
Research, reflection, and good note-taking are crucial.
Helpful tips:
.
· Take time to select a question or problem that interests you and that has significance for your audience.
· Choose a topic you haven’t written about before (in another course) and for which you do not already have a strong opinion. You may, however, choose a topic about which you have already written in this course (for any of your smaller assignments) or choose a new topic altogether.
· The essay should be organized chronologically and indicate gradual development of your thinking with clear transitions and logical development.
· As you detail your research process, you’ll include summaries of and responses to your secondary sources.
· Show how the problem/question is interesting, problematic, and important.
· The paper’ ...
CHAPTER6RESEARCHLEARNING OBJECTIVES• Describe the importan.docxtiffanyd4
CHAPTER
6
RESEARCH
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Describe the importance of responsible research choices
• Outline an effective, efficient research strategy
• Create search terms for focused online searches
• Gather relevant research materials
• Discover the note-taking approach that works best for you
• Evaluate the credibility and usefulness of different sources
• Effectively organize research materials and choose the most useful ones
• Correctly cite your sourcesCHAPTER OUTLINE
• Introduction: Becoming an Expert
• Researching Responsibly
• The Research Process
• How to Conduct an Online Search
• Gathering Your Materials
• Reading Your Materials and Taking Notes
• Evaluating Sources
• Revising Your Claims
• Organizing Your Research Information
• Choosing the Sources for Your Speech
• Citing Your Sources and Avoiding Plagiarism
• Getting Help from a Research Expert
Robert and Dixie have been assigned to speak on either side of an issue, a kind of “pros and cons” format. They chose home schooling as their issue. each has a general position on it (Dixie is in favor, and Robert against) but they admit they just don't know that much about it. So what now? How do they become well enough informed to give a speech on the topic? Where should they even start? How can you keep track of your research? Do you have cite it?Overview
Research is necessary for an effective public speech. This chapter will help you make responsible, well-crafted, and carefully executed research choices. First, we will help you figure out what you already know and translate that knowledge into a research strategy. Next, we will provide some concrete tips on where to go for research (including other people as well as the Internet and the library), how to design a good search query for search engines and databases, and how to narrow your search. After that, we will address what you need to do once you have collected your research material, including how to read through it, take notes, and evaluate which sources are worthwhile. Finally, we will deal with how to use your research process to refine your arguments, choose and organize your quotations, and give proper credit for the sources you use in your speech.
MindTap®
Start with a warm-up activity about Stephanie's speech, and review the chapter's Learning Objectives.INTRODUCTION: BECOMING AN EXPERT
Researching, composing, and delivering an effective public speech requires you to acquire some expertise on your topic. You don't have to be the kind of expert who can produce original facts, figures, and data and publish groundbreaking work regarding your topic. But you do need to become enough of an expert on your topic to translate the research that you have done to an audience that may not have the same background or comfort with concepts and terminology that you have developed in your research. On your topic, you are the expert for your audience's purposes. You should cultivate enough expertise on your topic to bring new insights to .
Due Dec 8Setting Up Your ResearchRead and answer the questions hig.docxjacksnathalie
Due Dec 8Setting Up Your Research
Read and answer the questions highlighted in color of yellow 150 to 200 words and then answer the additional question in blue all others highlighted in yellow
Respond to the following exercises from Chapter One of The Literature Review in 150 to 200 words each. For the Additional Question, record the research and null hypotheses for your project. Post References if used
· Exercise 1.1: Discovering the Subject of Your Interest or Issue of Inquiry
· Exercise 1.2: Understanding the Personal Viewpoint
· Exercise 1.3: Selecting the Focus of Your Study
· Exercise 1.5: Developing Your Interest Statement
Additional Question: What are your research and null hypotheses?
Chapter One
Step One: Select a Topic
Task 1. Choose a Research Interest
Most applied research begins by selecting an everyday problem,
interest, or concern for further study. Selecting an interest for study
needs great care and forethought. As the opening quote says: “Hoe
in haste, harvest in tears.” Selecting a suitable interest for research is
critical to the success of the project. This search begins with personal
reflection that uncovers an interest.
Research interests come mainly from the researcher’s curiosity.
Various professional and public settings provide the context for theseconcerns and present fruitful opportunities for the discovery of a formal
research topic. If one’s own introspection does not provide an
issue, other avenues are available. Topic suggestions can come from
experts knowledgeable in the academic disciplines or from those who
are skilled practitioners in the field. Perhaps reading various academic
and professional trade journals can uncover areas for further
research. Frequently, journal articles include suggestions for further
research. Tapping into media and professional association reports
about current issues will also uncover research alternatives. Also, the
current national, state, or local debates and initiatives concerning
your professional field can become research interests. Finally, you
can seek issues from your applied field.
Next, identify and use the scientific principles or theories of
your chosen area to address the issue. For example, what theories
in cognitive psychology speak to the developmental learning
abilities of students? What does sociological theory predict about
group behavior? How does cultural anthropological theory provide
an understanding about the culture of the work community?
The theoretical models in the various social sciences can always
provide new insights. In fact, there are many places to find
research interests. The following provides a summary of possible
Exercises
Throughout this text, you will find a series of exercises to help in
the various tasks of developing a literature review. The first four
exercises in this chapter employ free writes. A free write is spontaneous
writing done without reference to notes or outlines. Its purpose is
to explore what you have already int ...
This overviews our Key Concepts, discusses how we will be exploring those concepts in your LOI, explains what coming up with an LOI means and how to come up with a good one.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
3. Pick Topic (maybe write the thesis)
Find sources
General
(Read sources…maybe)
OR
Go quote-mining
Write paper
4. Nothing Learned
Often Biased Research
Usually reports what others are saying rather than adding to the
conversation
Often takes shallow look at the issue
5. Inquiry is different from research?
Inquiry is different from research in that you are not
hunting for answers to things, or trying to find
information to support or refute an idea (like a thesis
statement), but more of a state of mind where you are
open and willing to not only question, but follow where
those questions take you. It's a curiosity, a willingness to
trust that there is always something more to know,
and that the more we know, the more fully we can
understand something. [It is] also … leaving room for
there being multiple answers and perspectives, not just
one or a pro and a con. “
6. “Read” something
General
think
Find a source
Ask more questions
Read the source
Make something
Read the source
Ask a question
Find more sources
Read the source Write something
Find more sources
Ask a different question
think
read
read
7. Convergent
Thinking
Promotes critical thinking
and questioning
Knowledge is
often surface
level only
Doesn’t promote critical thinking
or developed ideas
Divergent Thinking – start with one
idea or question and then branch out–
see where it goes
Requires minimal research so skills
don’t improve
Knowledge is
nuanced.
Stretches and improves
research skills
8. Why do inquiry instead?
Inquiry-guided learning promotes learning through students’
active investigation of questions, problems, and issues,
often for which there is no one, single answer. It fosters
complex student learning outcomes such as critical
thinking, habits of independent inquiry, responsibility
for one’s own learning, and intellectual growth and
maturity.
9. 1) Reporting information without looking at it through the context of your
own experiences, observations, knowledge, and other readings and
information
2) Research you compile to a question you already know the answer to
3) Research that only skims the surface and doesn’t show engagement or
efforts to really understand the issue from multiple angles
4) Research that follows a straight line and stops at the first sign of an
answer– Usually this happens if you’ve gotten some basic information
or a perspective that looks good and you think, “I found everything I
need. I need to go anywhere else.”
5) Research that doesn’t produce new questions and knowledge. Good
inquiry should take you somewhere new and open new doors.
6) Planning an argument – Usually this leads to one-sided research.
7) Fact or answer hunting
10.
11. For this assignment, you will be asked to inquire into an ethical issue of your choosing.
You will explore, research, analyze, synthesize, and eventually take a stance on that
issue.
Total Point Value: 300
The Break Down—
Proposal Forum: 20
Annotated Bibliography of Research: 100
Reflection: 30
Essay: 150
This essay, for me, is what the course is building to. Quizzes, journals, even exams,
are all merely practice for this essay. This is where I should see that you can go
through the process of choosing an issue, researching the context and opinions,
applying an ethical theory, examining the ethical implications, and then choosing and
defending your stance.
12. Ethical argument and discussion requires:
1.Critical Thinking, Analysis and Examination
2.An Informed Understanding of the Situation
3.A sympathetic understanding of other people’s values and other
people’s point of view
We get no where if we simply preach our own values without
making an effort to understand others.
13. Clarify.
1.Determine precisely what must be decided.
2.Formulate and devise the full range of alternatives.
3.Eliminate patently impractical, illegal and improper alternatives.
4.Force yourself to develop at least three ethically justifiable options.
5.Examine each option to determine which ethical principles and values are
involved.
Evaluate.
1.Do any of the options requires the sacrifice of any ethical principle?
2.Which are the solid facts and which are beliefs, desires, theories,
suppositions, unsupported conclusions, opinions, and rationalizations?
3.How credible are the sources of information being used, especially when
they are self-interested, ideological or biased.
4.What are the benefits, burdens and risks to each stakeholder. Can I live
with this decision? (Will you feel guilt or regret? Will you be comfortable
with others knowing you made this decision?)
14. You will not be asked to provide a formal proposal, but you will be
asked to participate in a forum that responds to questions about the
issue you’ve chosen and responds to others’ choices.
Due Date: This will be included in your prep work on Moodle, but
will be included as a part of your grade.
Details of the Forum will be discussed in class.
15. Format: MLA or Chicago. (I prefer Chicago. If you need help from me with citations, I
am much more helpful with MLA.)
Length: You should have a bibliography that annotates at least SIX sources with a
length 200-300 words per annotation before the bibliographic citation.
Content: Each annotation should 1) include an MLA bibliographic citation, 2)
summarize the source in your own words, and 3) evaluate the source’s credibility
and usefulness for your research.
Research Requirements and Goals: Your research choices are your own. Your
research should reflect multiple source types, opinions, and types of information.
It is advised that you avoid sources that reflect extreme bias, are associated with a
content farm (Ezine, Ehow, and Livestrong are a few examples), or provide a
superficial look at the issue.
Due Date: Friday, November 14
16. 1) Begins by introducing the source
2) Stays focused-- Provides the main purpose and thesis of the source
as well as the main points
3) Remains in present tense
4) Uses your own words to show understanding and doesn’t rely on
quoted material from the source. (Terms and phrases are okay.)
5) Remains Objective– A reader should not be able to discern your
opinion about the issue or the source by how you summarize it.
1) Use author signals– Ex. According to the author…
2) Avoid evaluative adjectives to describe points.
17.
18. 1) Discusses the background and credentials of the author and/or
the publication
2) Addresses the recentness and/or relevance of the information
3) Discusses what is specifically useful about the source: the
perspective, the study results, the background info,
organization/presentation of ideas etc.
4) Addresses any bias the source may have
5) Addresses the credibility of the sources referenced by the
author
This is a essentially a few sentences that gives your opinion on the
quality of the source as a source of information on the issue.
Avoid getting too far into your opinion about the issue itself, and
avoid discussing how you plan to use it in your paper.
19. Lopez-Duran, Nestor PhD. “Bully victims may be at risk for developing psychotic symptoms.”
Child Psychology Research Blog, 11 May 2009. Web. 5 March 2010.
Nestor Lopez-Duran discusses a longitudinal study conducted in 2009 by British researchers
discovering whether or not the results signify victimization as the cause of psychotic
symptoms. This study shows that adults who have experienced psychotic disorder most likely
have a history of victimization. He begins by stating that research has shown that bullying can
cause different levels of consequences for the victims. Then, he gives the results from the
British researchers, which show that being bullied during childhood double the risk of
developing psychotic symptoms. Finally, he examines possibilities why these children are at
high risk of developing psychotic disorders. Duran also discusses how the British researchers
found a very interesting element called the “dose response,” which deals with how often a
child is bullied.
Nestor Lopez-Duran is currently an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan
where he researches mood disorders concerning children and adolescents; he coordinates
Neuropsychology assessment services at the University Center for the Child and the Family. He is also
an editor for Child-Psych research where he discusses the most recent research on parenting,
child disorders, and child development.
Duran presents the British research findings and then explores all of the possibilities that may
cause a child to have psychotic symptoms. His presentation of possibilities and for symptoms
is helpful in understanding how the effects are interrelated and mutually causational. Duran
effectively backs up conclusions based off the British researcher’s findings. The article was
written in 2009, which makes his information still relevant to this increasing issue. This article
is beneficial for my research because Duran discusses several different reasons on why a
child may develop psychotic symptoms due to being bullied.
20. You will not be asked to provide a formal reflective essay, but you
will be asked to submit a reflection that asks you to respond to
questions about the issue you researched to discuss learning about
the issue, the theory might apply, and to brainstorm how you might
proceed with your essay. You will be asked to make specific
references to sources in your reflection.
This is a transitional assignment.
Due Date: This will be included in your prep work on Moodle, but
will be included as a part of your grade.
Details of the reflection will be discussed in class.
21. This is a 6-8 page paper in which you apply one of the
ethical frameworks we have studied in class to an ethical
issue of your choosing.
If you are registered as ITIS, you must choose an issue
in technology. If you are registered as LBST, you may
choose any ethical issue.
In general, you’ll isolate what the issue is, state what theory
you’re following and what its central features are as they
apply to this issue, and then use the theory to address the
issue.
Due Date: Wednesday, December 6
22. Note that your paper must have a thesis, which should be stated
within your introduction. A strong thesis will make a clear claim
about your stance on that dilemma.
Sample Thesis: “Therefore, a Kantian approach shows what is
ethically wrong with GMO foods.” Notice that this thesis takes a
clear stance and also lays out the ethical framework that will be
used to defend this stance. You may also blueprint the specific
reasons that you will be using to make your argument.
If you have not taken a clear stance and/or have not laid out the
ethical framework you will be using, then you don’t have a usable
thesis.
23. Your goal should then be to develop an argument to support the
position you take, using reasons and evidence sufficient to back
your claims.
If I come away thinking that your thesis was, “In this paper I’m
going to fill six pages making random comments on privacy,”
you’re not going to get a good grade because you haven’t
actually looked at it through a specific ethical framework.
You can go on and on making excellent points about your opinion on
the issue, but if you haven’t applied the theory, you haven’t done your
job.
We are reading many papers that can be models for you to follow:
for example, Solove on privacy, paper(s) on violent video games,
extra credit readings, and Benkler/Nissenbaum.
24. 1) Provide a strong introduction: a) Hook the audience, b) Provide initial
background information on the issue, c) Provide a strong thesis
2) Give necessary background information on the issue and on nature of
the current conversation: What’s going on right now? What is the
debate, and what are the various perspectives? Who are the
stakeholders?
3) Give necessary background information on the ethical framework in a
way that demonstrates understanding of the theory, its major players
(theorists), and how it’s being applied in your paper
4) Give strong reasons and evidence that support your thesis
5) Organize information appropriately and provide clear transitions
between ideas.
25. 6) Demonstrate fair-mindedness (see presentation on Moodle)
7) Avoid logical fallacies
8) Avoid over-relying on outside information: A good rule of thumb for
any argument is that no more than 1/3 of your paper should be
from an outside source. At least 2/3 should be your own
commentary, analysis, discussion, etc.
9) Introduce and explain outside sources appropriately and
integrates them smoothly into the text. Remember that readers
may have not done your research and need context for the source
(author, study conditions, main points) and how it is used to prove
your point. In other words, you need to be able to explain a
statistic, study, or claim you’ve used: what it means, how it should
be interpreted, what the reader should notice, how it proves your
thesis or supports a specific reason you are asserting.
10) Provide a strong conclusion that reiterates main points and leaves
the reader with something to think about.
26. There will be a handful of opportunity for groups of 2 to 3 people to
complete a group annotated bibliography and an interactive group
presentation.
For this option, a group annotated bibliography will be submitted with at
least 10 sources for a group of 2 and 15 for a group of 3.
The group presentation must be approximately 30 minutes and should
include both a visual component and an interactive component that gets
the class involved in some way and encourages them to participate and
discuss the issue you’ve explored.
Group projects are still subject to the above list provided for a strong
essay. Your presentation should show strong research, planning, and
organization.
I can allow up to FOUR group presentations. They will be assigned on a
first-come-first-serve basis.
27. Both your annotated bibliography and essay (or presentation
materials) will be submitted through Turn-it In.
Evidence of plagiarism will result in an automatic 0 for that portion
of the assignment and a possible failing grade for the course (a
decision that will be made at my discretion depending on the level
of the offense).