2. A Study on The Prevalence of ESBL Producing Gram Negative Bacilli In A Tertiary Care
Hospital
http://www.iaeme.com/IJARET/index.asp 37 editor@iaeme.com
of enzymes that mediate resistance to extended spectrum (3rd generation)
cephalosporins and monobactams [3-4] .ESBLs are rapidly evolving, undergoing
continuous mutation.More than 300 different ESBL variants. TEM, SHV and CTX M
are the common types[5-6].Important cause of transferable multi drug resistance in
GNB.So it is important that ESBL should be detected in organisms in hospitals and
health care settings. ESBLs belong to Molecular class A, in the classification scheme
of Ambler. Functional group 2be in Bush Jacoby Medeiros classification [7-8].
The persistent exposure of the bacterial strains to a multitude of β-lactams has
induced a dynamic and continuous production and mutation of β-lactamases in the
bacteria, expanding their activity even against the third and fourth generation
cephalosporins such as ceftazidime, cefotaxime and cefepime and also against
aztreonam. These new β-lactamases are called extended spectrum β-lactamases
(ESBLs) [9-10].
ESBL enzymes are plasmid borne and they have evolved from point mutations
which altered the configuration of the active site of the original and long known β-
lactamases, which have been designated as TEM-1, TEM-2, and SHV-1 [11]. The
resistance to newer β-lactams which are a result of these ß-lactamases, has emerged
quickly.
2. AIM OF THIS STUDY
To determine the prevalence of ESBL producing strains of Gram Negative Bacilli
among GNB isolates from clinical samples. Detection of ESBL production by
phenotypic methods
3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study period – 1 year. Clinical samples included in this study - urine, blood, pus,
wound swab, sputum, and ET aspirate. Informed consent was obtained from the
patients prior to sample collection. GNB isolates from the samples mentioned above
were subjected to antibiotic sensitivity testing by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method.
The initial screening test was performed along with the routine ABST by the routine
Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. The screening test was positive when the
inhibition zone of < 27 mm for Cefotaxime was observed.
3.1. Antibiotic Panel Used For Routine Sensitivity Testing
The strains were tested for susceptibility against Ampicillin(10μg), Gentamicin
(10μg), Amikacin(10μg), Cefotaxime(30μg),Netilmicin(30μg),Cefazolin (30μg),
Cefuroxime(30μg) Cefepime(30μg), Ciprofloxacin(30μg), Norfloxacin(30μg),
Nitrofurantoin (30μg), Imipenem (10μg),Meropenem(10μg), Cotrimoxazole (30μg),
Piperacillin tazobactam (30μg)
Phenotypic confirmation test was performed by the Double Disc synergy testing
method as follows. A Mueller Hinton agar culture plate was inoculated with a lawn of
0.5 Mc Farland turbidity of the strain to be tested. Piperacillin tazobactam (100/10 µg)
disc was placed in the centre of a Mueller Hinton culture plate and a disc of
Cefotaxime was placed at a distance of 15mm apart from the Pip Taz disc. Any
distortion or increase in the zone towards the disc of Pip Tazo was considered as
positive for the ESBL production.
3. John Maria Louis.P and Bosco Dhanaseeli.P
http://www.iaeme.com/IJARET/index.asp 38 editor@iaeme.com
4. RESULTS
Total number of samples processed – 6672.Number of GNB isolated from the
samples – 2366.Total number of ESBL producers – 141
Double Disc Synergy Testing
5. URINE
Number of samples processed – 6672 (Urine 4272, 1176 showed significant
bacteriuria)
Total GNB isolates ESBL producers
Total 1176 80
Ecoli 735 39
Klebsiella 111 14
Acinetobacter 76 7
Pseudomonas species 80 6
Citrobacter 64 6
Proteus 69 5
Enterobacter 41 3
4. A Study on The Prevalence of ESBL Producing Gram Negative Bacilli In A Tertiary Care
Hospital
http://www.iaeme.com/IJARET/index.asp 39 editor@iaeme.com
6. PUS SAMPLES
Total number of samples processed 1759, of which 846 yielded GNB
GNB isolates ESBL producers
Total 846 43
Ecoli 164 17
Klebsiella 129 13
Acinetobacter 106 5
Pseudomonas species 245 5
Citrobacter 108 1
Proteus 68 1
Enterobacter 26 1
7. SPUTUM AND BAL
Total number of samples processed 641, of which 344 yielded GNB
GNB isolates ESBL producers
Total 344 18
Ecoli 34 4
Klebsiella 79 8
Acinetobacter 84 3
Pseudomonas species 105 5
Citrobacter 32 1
Proteus 0 0
Enterobacter 0 0
ESBL prevalence rates among GNB
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500 2366
933
319
430
226 204
137
67
141
60 35 16 15 8 6 4
Total isolates
ESBL producers
5. John Maria Louis.P and Bosco Dhanaseeli.P
http://www.iaeme.com/IJARET/index.asp 40 editor@iaeme.com
8. DISCUSSION
In the recent years, the problem of increasing resistance to antibiotic has threatened
the entire world. The correct detection of ESBL producing microorganisms is a
challenge for the laboratories, as it requires not only phenotypic test also genotypic
test for all genes associate with β-lactamases production. A total of 6672 samples
were processed of which 2366 yielded Gram negative bacilli. In this study E coli
(933) and Klebsiella (319) were the most prevalent isolates among the Gram negative
bacilli. The prevalence of ESBL producing GNB was found to be 5.95%. In E coli the
ESBL prevalence was 6.43 % and in Klebsiella it was 10.97%.
9. CONCLUSION
There is a high prevalence of ESBL production in our hospital and so, it is essential to
report the ESBL production along with the routine sensitivity reports, which will help
the clinician in prescribing proper antibiotics. Also, control measures which include
the judicious use of antibiotics, antibiotic cycling, and the implementation of
appropriate infection control measures and the formulation of an antibiotic policy
must be done, to prevent the spread of these strains.
REFERENCES
[1] Medeiros AA. Evolution and dissemination of β-lactamases accelerateis by
generation of β-lactam antibiotics. Clin Infect Did 1997; 24 Suppl 1: S19-
S45.
[2] Bush K. New β-lactamases in gram-negative bacteria: diversit and impact on
the selection of antimicrobial therap. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 1085-9.
[3] Wong- Beringer A. Therapeutic challenges associated with extended-
spectrum, β-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli and klebsiella pneumonia.
Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21: 583-92.
[4] Patterson DL. Extended- spectrum β-lactamases: the European experience.
Curr Opin Infect Dis 2001; 14: 69-01.
[5] Burgess DS. Comparison of in vitro activity of
piperacillin/tazobactam,cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem against
extended- spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and non-ESBL producing
K.pneumoniae by time- kill methodology[abstr]. Pharmacotherapy 2001;
21:1273.
[6] Rebuck JA, Keith M, Olsen KM, Fey PD, Bergmann KL, Rupp ME. In vitro
activities of parenteral β-lactam antimicrobial against TEM-10, TEM-26 and
SHV-5-derived extended- spectrum β-lactamases expressed in an isogenic
Escherichia coli host. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 46: 461-4.
[7] Coudron PE, Moland ES, Thomson KS. Occurrence and detection of AmpC
β-lactamases among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus
mirabilis isolates at a veterans medical center.J Clin Microbiol 2003;38:
1791-6.
[8] Queenan AM, Jenkins S, Bush K. Cloning and biochemical characterization
of FOX-5, an AmpC- type plasmid – encoded β-lactamases from a New York
City Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
2001; 45: 3189-94.
[9] National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution:
antimicrobial susceptibility test for bacteria that grow aerobically: approved
6. A Study on The Prevalence of ESBL Producing Gram Negative Bacilli In A Tertiary Care
Hospital
http://www.iaeme.com/IJARET/index.asp 41 editor@iaeme.com
standard, 5th
ed. NCCLS document M7-A5. Wayne, PA: National Committee
for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2000.
[10] Bali EB, Acik L, Sultan N. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of
SHV, TEM, CTX-M and extended spectrum β-lactamase produced by
Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumanii and Klebsiella isolates in a Turkish
hospital. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010; 4(8): 650-654
[11] Samaha-Kfoury J N, Araj G F. Recent developments in β-lactamases and
extended spectrum β-lactamases. BMJ 2003; 327:1209-13.
[12] Dr. Satpal Singh and Dr. Pankaj, Health Care Quality Assurance: Emergency
Department of A Tertiary Care Hospital, International Journal of Advanced
Research in Management 4(1), 2013, pp. 31 - 41.