How did we get here the evolving epidemic of addictive disease in the united ...Mrsunny4
The opioid crisis in the US is part of the larger epidemic of Substance Use Disorder, an equal opportunity brain disease, affecting over 40 million children, teens and adults. Addiction does not respect age, gender, ethnicity, income or zip code
This integrated media series is a promotional website for A Night of Mistakes, a short movie about the implications from a night of underage drinking. It stars Chase Daniels, a star athlete from an underprivileged family who attends a party and partakes in drinking, drug use and even sexual relations. This leads to immediate implications with his parents, his personal life and education as he impregnates a girl from the party. After a series of events that unfolds from that night of partying, Chase looks back and realizes that it really was not worth it. The website for the unreleased movie will help educate children about underage drinking.
How did we get here the evolving epidemic of addictive disease in the united ...Mrsunny4
The opioid crisis in the US is part of the larger epidemic of Substance Use Disorder, an equal opportunity brain disease, affecting over 40 million children, teens and adults. Addiction does not respect age, gender, ethnicity, income or zip code
This integrated media series is a promotional website for A Night of Mistakes, a short movie about the implications from a night of underage drinking. It stars Chase Daniels, a star athlete from an underprivileged family who attends a party and partakes in drinking, drug use and even sexual relations. This leads to immediate implications with his parents, his personal life and education as he impregnates a girl from the party. After a series of events that unfolds from that night of partying, Chase looks back and realizes that it really was not worth it. The website for the unreleased movie will help educate children about underage drinking.
Social Media and Substance Abuse Implication for Preventive Strategies among ...ijtsrd
Adolescent substance abuse is a major problem all over the world. Substances are consumed by both male and female adolescents, and pose a serious threat to the consumers and the society as at large. The causes of substance abuse are numerous and varied. It is imperative to seek ways to curb this malice that is threatening the welfare of Cameroonians individually, economically and even socially. This study sets out to ascertain the extent to which the social media influence substance abuse among adolescents in urban schools in Cameroon, and to determine preventive strategies. The concurrent nested mixed method research design was used to carry out the study. The Simple Random sampling was adopted in the selection of public, mission and private schools from four regions of Cameroon, classrooms in each school and 375 students. Purposive sampling was used to select discipline masters and guidance counsellors. A questionnaire of 10 items was used to collect data from the students and an interview guide to collect data from the discipline masters and guidance counsellors. The hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance using spearman rho test, through SPSS version 25.The findings showed that social media significantly predicted substance abuse among adolescent students R= 0.258 , P= 0.000 0.05 . Finally, findings showed that at zero order correlation when the preventive strategies were not involved in the correlation analysis, the coefficient value was 0.374 but, when the correlation was controlled by the preventive strategies, the coefficient value increased from 0.374 to 0.908 of almost a perfect relationship 1 . The study concluded that the social media influence drug abuse among adolescent students in urban schools in Cameroon. From the study it was recommended that research be carried out to determine the effects of drugs on students’ performance, health and the society. Chefuh Patricia Asoh | Dr. Bongwung Bruno "Social Media and Substance Abuse: Implication for Preventive Strategies among Adolescent Students in Urban Schools in Cameroon" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-6 | Issue-6 , October 2022, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd51927.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/education/51927/social-media-and-substance-abuse-implication-for-preventive-strategies-among-adolescent-students-in-urban-schools-in-cameroon/chefuh-patricia-asoh
Being the art director of the team, my duty is to design the book from scratch including color scheme, layout, font, info-graphic, web design, info-visualization and logo design.
708There is a wealth of literature highlighting the ne.docxevonnehoggarth79783
708
T
here is a wealth of literature highlighting the
negative physical (eg, type II diabetes, car-
diovascular problems) and psychosocial (eg,
depression, low self-worth) consequences of ado-
lescent obesity.1-3 However, less attention has been
given to the role adolescent weight status plays in
future health-risk behaviors, such as problematic
substance use. With adolescent overweight and
obesity rates remaining high (33.6% overweight,
18.4% obese 12-19 years),4 and substance use
more prevalent in young adulthood than any other
developmental period,5 identification of adolescent
weight status as a predictor of future problematic
substance use behavior is likely to have a signifi-
cant impact on research and clinical work aimed to
reduce multiple health risks in the transition from
adolescence to adulthood.
Adolescence is a crucial period for prevention ef-
forts aimed to reduce problematic substance use in
young adulthood. According to the National Survey
of Drug Use and Health,5 young adults have the
highest rates of current tobacco use (39.5% overall
including 33.5% cigarette use) and illicit drug use
(21.4%), with 19.0% using marijuana in the past
month. Binge drinking has been reported for 39.8%
and heavy alcohol use for 12.1% of 18- to 25-year-
olds. In the past 30 years, many epidemiological
longitudinal studies have identified several key
risk factors for problematic substance use, includ-
ing regular cigarette smoking, binge drinking, and
marijuana use, in adolescence and young adult-
hood. Temperament,6 behavioral disinhibition,7 ex-
ternalizing behaviors,8 poor parental monitoring,9
lack of parental support,10 negative peer interac-
tions,11 and affiliation with deviant peers12 have
been well-established as critical factors involved in
the development of problematic substance use.13-15
Considering the array of risk factors in adolescence
contributing to future problematic substance use,
it is likely that other health-risk conditions, such
as overweight or obesity status, are linked to prob-
lematic substance use behavior.
Little is currently known about the relationship
between adolescent weight status and future prob-
lematic substance use; however, use of an adoles-
cent developmental framework is likely to increase
our understanding of why this relationship may be
a significant one to address. One explanation may
be that a shared underlying factor like impulsivity
may explain co-occurring obesity and problematic
substance use. As children learn to self-regulate
behaviors, those who have difficulties with self-
control are more likely to over-consume energy-
dense food contributing to obesity risk16,17 and en-
gage in antisocial behaviors leading to substance
abuse and dependence.18,19 Although a shared
underlying factor explanation is plausible, under-
standing adolescent behavior without considering
the social context is incomplete.
H. Isabella Lanza, Research Associate and Chri.
environment to result in alcohol addiction. More studies should al.docxSALU18
environment to result in alcohol addiction. More studies should also enlighten the extent to which genes participate to alcohol issues, both in youngsters and adults (Foster, et al., 2013).
Socioeconomic Model:
Researchers have keen interest to find the link between behavioral health conditions in adulthood and childhood socioeconomic status (SES). Some studies revealed that the youngsters with low SES are susceptible towards substance use in young age. Huang and Goodman studied the first wave cross-sectional; he found that having low SES was linked with greater alcoholic consumption. Goodman found that lower income or the financial crisis and low educational status of the parents led to individual complexes and thus more significant depression.
Reinherz along with his fellows, from the year 1977-2000 observed 360 suspects and concluded that low SES of family and large family were linked with substance abuse and alcoholism issues at the early age of life (Masten, et al., 2014). Hamilton and his fellows, Ontario Student Drug Use Survey, found that youngsters (12-19) having educated parents were less prone or susceptible to get involve in risky or dangerous drinking or drug abuse.
Although we have confirmation those boys with high SES may also be liable for having the substance addiction. Alcohol use is sensitive to price, according to research consumption declines as the price rises. For youngsters with raised SES, with sound financial status show that the cost of substance abuse is lower than that of the boys with low SES. Bellis and his fellows found that kids who spend more money drink more, heavy drinking in public as well while the ones with low SES drink less (Miller, et al., 2010).
Binge drinking is associated with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) and homicidal or accidental deaths of college going students. The fact that illegal drugs are considered illegal in the USA, the substance abuse causes youngsters to get themselves involve in criminal justice. Thus, the substance abuse can cause extraordinary adverse effects for boys.
The rationale of the study is to determine that the adolescents with high SES, having a financial status and educated parents, are susceptible to get involve in alcohol consumption and illegal drug abuse, using the nationally-representative sample of college students in the USA. Bellis and his fellows collected cross-sectional data on alcohol consumption in the UK and Martin along with his colleagues who examined pervasiveness of alcohol consumption among college students in the USA (Levy, et al., 2011). As a lot of literature is being written on adults with low SES, the results of this research can guide the parents and teachers to recognize the students who are at risk for substance abuse in future.
The result of this study how that high SES, a linked with high parental educational status and the healthy financial situation is associated with high rates of substance ab ...
Running head DRUG ABUSE AND ADDICTION1DRUG ABUSE AND ADDICTION.docxjeanettehully
Running head: DRUG ABUSE AND ADDICTION 1
DRUG ABUSE AND ADDICTION 6
Drug Abuse and Addiction
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
Public Safety Issue: Drug Abuse and Addiction
Public safety issue refers to any problem which threatens the wellbeing of people and prosperity of communities. A solution to such challenges is crucial in order to ensure that safety of people is protected and safeguarded. The issue of drug abuse and concern among school going teenagers has become a major problem in United States. According to a survey conducted by Monitoring the Future (MTF), on average, 29 percent of the school kids between grades 8, 10, and 12 were found to be using drugs. This has raised a major concern that requires the government to work closely with relevant public safety organizations in order to contain this issue.
Research Topic: The Importance of Introducing Drug Abuse Unit in The Curriculum of the American Education System
Overview
According to findings of Monitoring the Future survey released in 2018, there is a significant increase in number of school going youths engaging in drug abuse activities. Marijuana, opioid abuse, alcohol, synthetic drugs, tobacco, and nicotine are among the top drugs and substances abused by teenagers and school going kids. These statistics are alarming since they present one of the major challenge to the wellbeing and prosperity of the future generation. Many anti-drug abuse and addiction organizations such as National Institutes on Health (NIH), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), and National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) have been working relentlessly to curb this rising level of drug abuse and addiction among teenagers. Despite all the efforts by these organizations, their programs have failed to achieve any substantial success as far the fight against drug abuse and addiction among teenagers is concerned. This research is aimed at exploring the relevant literature from books, peer-reviewed journals, publications, and other academic effort in the effort to present the dire need to integrate drug abuse into the curriculum of the American education system. The findings of the research will be a boost to the government and other public safety organizations in the fight against drug abuse and addiction among teenagers and school going youths.
Annotated Bibliography
Duncan, D. T., Palamar, J. J., & Williams, J. H. (2014). Perceived neighborhood illicit drug selling, peer illicit drug disapproval and illicit drug use among US high school seniors. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 9(1), 35.
The paper explores the problem of marijuana use among the students in U.S. high schools. Notably, more than 45.5 percent of the respondents revealed that they have used marijuana once on their lifetime while the other 36.4 percent revealing that they have used marijuana in the last one year. Additionally, another 22.7 percent of the respondents noting that they have been consta ...
Chapter 5 5. Eaton Tool Company has fixed costs of $255,000,.docxchristinemaritza
Chapter 5
5. Eaton Tool Company has fixed costs of $255,000, sells its units for $66, and has variable costs of $36 per unit.
Break-even analysis
(LO5-2)
a. Compute the break-even point.
b. Ms. Eaton comes up with a new plan to cut fixed costs to $200,000. However, more labor will now be required, which will increase variable costs per unit to $39. The sales price will remain at $66. What is the new break-even point?
c. Under the new plan, what is likely to happen to profitability at very high volume levels (compared to the old plan)?
10. The Sterling Tire Company’s income statement for 2013 is as follows:
Degree of leverage
(LO5-2 & 5-5)
STERLING TIRE COMPANY
Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Sales (20,000 tires at $60 each)
$1,200,000
Less: Variable costs (20,000 tires at $30)
600,000
Fixed costs
400,000
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)
$ 200,000
Interest expense
50,000
Earnings before taxes (EBT)
$ 150,000
Income tax expense (30%)
45,000
Earnings after taxes (EAT)
$ 105,000
Given this income statement, compute the following:
a. Degree of operating leverage.
b. Degree of financial leverage.
c. Degree of combined leverage.
d. Break-even point in units.
14. International Data Systems information on revenue and costs is only relevant up to a sales volume of 105,000 units. After 105,000 units, the market becomes saturated and the price per unit falls from $14.00 to $8.80. Also, there are cost overruns at a production volume of over 105,000 units, and variable cost per unit goes up from $7.00 to $8.00. Fixed costs remain the same at $55,000.
Nonlinear breakeven analysis
(LO5-2)
a. Compute operating income at 105,000 units.
b. Compute operating income at 205,000 units.
Chapter 6
Short-term versus longer-term borrowing
(LO6-3)
Intermediate Problems
9. Sauer Food Company has decided to buy a new computer system with an expected life of three years. The cost is $150,000. The company can borrow $150,000 for three years at 10 percent annual interest or for one year at 8 percent annual interest.
BCJ 4101, Police and Community Relations 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit VI
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
9. Analyze violence, crime, and vandalism in schools.
Reading Assignment
Chapter 11:
Community Policing and Drugs
Chapter 12:
Bringing Youths into Community Policing
Unit Lesson
There are many correlations to crime. Correlations of crime include factors such as poverty, unemployment,
mental illness, IQ, and substance abuse. Many studies have been devoted to looking specifically at the
connection between drugs and crime. Youth throughout the entire United States are surveyed annually to
assess their initial and continued exposure to drugs through self, friends, and/or family use. Data describing
drug use across age groups report alarming trends. For example, more than half of young adults will have
tried at ...
Running head: RESEARCH PROPOSAL 1
RESEARCH PROPOSAL 13
Research Proposal
Constance Lingard
Global University of Arizona
Research Proposal
Introduction
The long-term and life-changing effects of parental substance abuse on their children are well-documented. One of these young people's many dangers is a lack of stable housing. A child who does not live with either biological parent is at far greater risk for adverse health and safety outcomes due to parental substance misuse. Even though research shows that these young individuals are more likely to be homeless, little is known about their real living situations. Illicit drug use by parents has a negative impact on all aspects of their lives, including their ability to care for their children (Lloyd, 2018). Parents who use drugs are more likely to break the law and neglect their children, which can lead to the latter becoming homeless and the former needing the assistance of child welfare agencies.
Background
Drug addiction can devastate a person's physical and mental health. Substance abuse inevitably results in dependence on the abused substance to the point where the user is unable to function normally without it. Alcohol and illegal narcotics are two examples of often abused substances. These chemicals are highly addictive, and their suppliers sometimes have difficulty breaking free of their association with their customers' drug use. Limiting their use is challenging because they're always tempted to partake owing to the substances' euphoric effects (Lipari & Van Horn, 2017). A person's health, among other aspects of their existence, often suffers significantly due to their addiction to such substances. Social and environmental consequences are two more examples. Most drug users would rather be tolerant of their drugs' effects than immune to them. The effects of substance misuse are not confined to the person who uses them; instead, they permeate all aspects of society, including homes, schools, and businesses.
Parents are part of the population known to engage in the intake of illicit drugs, which might be contributed by the challenging economic problems and stressful workplaces. Adults that take illicit drugs and even alcohol might be using it as a remedy to the problems they are experiencing in their workplaces and the financial challenges taking them to be addicted to them and become a serious menace. Some workplaces are becoming a problem for most employees, especially those with families, to provide food to them because of the depression and stress experienced in the workplace. Most of them decide to engage in substance and illicit drug abuse instead of resigning. The problem of illicit drug use moves to their families, where some become violent, and some also become ir ...
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar leads (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
The prostate is an exocrine gland of the male mammalian reproductive system
It is a walnut-sized gland that forms part of the male reproductive system and is located in front of the rectum and just below the urinary bladder
Function is to store and secrete a clear, slightly alkaline fluid that constitutes 10-30% of the volume of the seminal fluid that along with the spermatozoa, constitutes semen
A healthy human prostate measures (4cm-vertical, by 3cm-horizontal, 2cm ant-post ).
It surrounds the urethra just below the urinary bladder. It has anterior, median, posterior and two lateral lobes
It’s work is regulated by androgens which are responsible for male sex characteristics
Generalised disease of the prostate due to hormonal derangement which leads to non malignant enlargement of the gland (increase in the number of epithelial cells and stromal tissue)to cause compression of the urethra leading to symptoms (LUTS
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
Explore natural remedies for syphilis treatment in Singapore. Discover alternative therapies, herbal remedies, and lifestyle changes that may complement conventional treatments. Learn about holistic approaches to managing syphilis symptoms and supporting overall health.
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
Recomendações da OMS sobre cuidados maternos e neonatais para uma experiência pós-natal positiva.
Em consonância com os ODS – Objetivos do Desenvolvimento Sustentável e a Estratégia Global para a Saúde das Mulheres, Crianças e Adolescentes, e aplicando uma abordagem baseada nos direitos humanos, os esforços de cuidados pós-natais devem expandir-se para além da cobertura e da simples sobrevivência, de modo a incluir cuidados de qualidade.
Estas diretrizes visam melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados pós-natais essenciais e de rotina prestados às mulheres e aos recém-nascidos, com o objetivo final de melhorar a saúde e o bem-estar materno e neonatal.
Uma “experiência pós-natal positiva” é um resultado importante para todas as mulheres que dão à luz e para os seus recém-nascidos, estabelecendo as bases para a melhoria da saúde e do bem-estar a curto e longo prazo. Uma experiência pós-natal positiva é definida como aquela em que as mulheres, pessoas que gestam, os recém-nascidos, os casais, os pais, os cuidadores e as famílias recebem informação consistente, garantia e apoio de profissionais de saúde motivados; e onde um sistema de saúde flexível e com recursos reconheça as necessidades das mulheres e dos bebês e respeite o seu contexto cultural.
Estas diretrizes consolidadas apresentam algumas recomendações novas e já bem fundamentadas sobre cuidados pós-natais de rotina para mulheres e neonatos que recebem cuidados no pós-parto em unidades de saúde ou na comunidade, independentemente dos recursos disponíveis.
É fornecido um conjunto abrangente de recomendações para cuidados durante o período puerperal, com ênfase nos cuidados essenciais que todas as mulheres e recém-nascidos devem receber, e com a devida atenção à qualidade dos cuidados; isto é, a entrega e a experiência do cuidado recebido. Estas diretrizes atualizam e ampliam as recomendações da OMS de 2014 sobre cuidados pós-natais da mãe e do recém-nascido e complementam as atuais diretrizes da OMS sobre a gestão de complicações pós-natais.
O estabelecimento da amamentação e o manejo das principais intercorrências é contemplada.
Recomendamos muito.
Vamos discutir essas recomendações no nosso curso de pós-graduação em Aleitamento no Instituto Ciclos.
Esta publicação só está disponível em inglês até o momento.
Prof. Marcus Renato de Carvalho
www.agostodourado.com
Knee anatomy and clinical tests 2024.pdfvimalpl1234
This includes all relevant anatomy and clinical tests compiled from standard textbooks, Campbell,netter etc..It is comprehensive and best suited for orthopaedicians and orthopaedic residents.
2. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
BACKGROUND2
Partnership for Drug-Free Kids
is dedicated to reducing teen
substance abuse and supporting
families impacted by addiction.
3. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
BACKGROUND 3
BACKGROUND
Partnership for Drug-Free Kids ™ 4
MetLife Foundation 5
The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study,
Sponsored by MetLife Foundation 6
Questionnaire Development 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
DETAILED FINDINGS
Marijuana 10
Medication Misuse and Abuse 14
Performance-Enhancing Substances 21
Alcohol 24
Other Trends in Teen Substance Abuse 25
IMPLICATIONS 28
The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study
Teens & Parents 2013
Research made possible by a grant from
4. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
BACKGROUND4
The Partnership for Drug-Free Kids is dedicated to reducing teen sub-
stance abuse and supporting families impacted by addiction.
We develop public education campaigns that drive awareness of teen
substance abuse, and lead teen-targeted efforts that inspire young
people to make positive decisions to stay healthy and avoid drugs and
alcohol. On our website, drugfree.org, and through our toll-free helpline
(1-855-DRUGFREE), we provide families with direct support and guid-
ance to help them address teen substance abuse. Finally, we build
healthy communities, and advocate for greater access to adolescent
treatment and funding for youth prevention programs. As a national
nonprofit, we depend on donations from individuals, corporations, foun-
dations and the public sector and are thankful to SAG-AFTRA and the
advertising and media industries for their ongoing generosity.
5. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
BACKGROUND 5
For more than 20 years, MetLife Foundation has provided support for
initiatives focusing on substance abuse prevention and education.
Since 1999, the Foundation has collaborated with the Partnership for
Drug-Free Kids on a national public awareness campaign to help par-
ents and caregivers communicate with children about the risks of drug
use.
MetLife Foundation has sponsored the MetLife Foundation / Partner-
ship Attitude Tracking Study since 2009.
MetLife Foundation was established in 1976 by MetLife to carry on
its long-standing tradition of corporate contributions and community
involvement. Their commitment to building a secure future for indi-
viduals and communities worldwide is reflected in their dedication to
empowering older adults, preparing young people and building liv-
able communities. Since it was established, MetLife Foundation has
provided more than $530 million in grants to nonprofit organizations
addressing issues that have a positive impact in their communities.
For more information about the Foundation, visit MetLife.org.
6. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
BACKGROUND6
The 2013 Partnership Attitude Tracking Study (PATS), sponsored by
MetLife Foundation, consists of two nationally projectable samples: a
survey that measures substance abuse attitudes and behaviors of par-
ents with at least one child aged 10 to 19 and a teen sample for students
in grades nine through twelve.
The 2013 survey is the 25th wave of research conducted since 1987.
Since 1993, the teen study has been conducted in schools, and since
1995 the parents sample has been conducted in homes. Respondent
confidentiality was maintained for both studies. Prior to those years, the
studies were conducted by interviews in central location malls. These
studies are based on self-reported data which represent the dominant
methodology used in survey research in this area.
Since 2007, deKadt Marketing and Research, Inc. has conducted the
in-home parent survey and since 1993, GfK Roper Public Affairs &
Corporate Communications has conducted the teen study. In 2013, the
parents/caregivers sample was 750 and surveying was conducted from
September to October 2013. The margin of error for the parent sample is
+/- 3.6 percentage points. In 2013, the teen sample was 3,705, and sur-
veying was conducted from February to June 2013. The margin of error
for the teens sample is +/- 2.1 percentage points.
Statistically significant differences on tables, charts or graphs in this re-
port are at the 95 percent confidence level and are annotated with either
an asterisk or a letter.
A/B/C = Statistically significant at 95 percent confidence level.
Questionnaire Development
deKadt Marketing and Research, Inc. and GfK Roper Public Affairs &
Corporate Communications developed the questionnaires in cooperation
with the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids and MetLife Foundation.
The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study
Sponsored by MetLife Foundation
7. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Changing Landscape
The 2013 Partnership Attitude Tracking Study (PATS)
reports on the attitudes and behavior of teens and par-
ents at a significant time in our culture’s relationship
with drugs and substance abuse.
In November 2012, Colorado passed Colorado Amendment 64 and
Washington passed Initiative 502, legalizing the recreational use of
marijuana for adults 21 years of age or older.
In August 2013, the Major League Baseball Association suspended
baseball star Alex Rodriguez for using performance-enhancing drugs,
and in a January 2013 televised interview, Lance Armstrong admitted
to doping throughout his athletic career.
Through this report, Partnership for Drug-Free Kids informs healthcare
professionals, educators, community leaders, the news media and
families about current patterns in adolescent use and misuse of drugs
and alcohol, including marijuana, performance-enhancing substances
and prescription medicine. In addition, we consider the influence that
some of these recent events may have on teen perceptions and behav-
ior relating to substance use.
Normative Marijuana Use
Over the past several years – at least since 2010, when teens’ marijua-
na use (lifetime) rose to 49 percent – overall prevalence has remained
relatively stable at a high level. Moreover, significant levels of daily
use, increases in perceived use by friends, and data showing that one
third of teens would be more likely to use marijuana if it were legal,
suggest that marijuana use is becoming essentially normalized among
a large segment of adolescents.
Although the “drug landscape” is changing for parents and teens alike,
it’s important to note that parents still have considerable influence on
their teens’ decisions. The new PATS data show that if parents com-
municate their disapproval of marijuana use, and if they effectively
communicate the risks associated with heavy marijuana use, then they
increase the chances that their child will avoid becoming a heavy mari-
juana user, even if he or she decides to experiment with marijuana.
Although the
“drug landscape”
is changing for parents and
teens alike, it’s important
to note that parents still
have considerable influence
on their teens’ decisions.
8. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY88
Prescription Drug Misuse and Abuse
After a reported 33 percent increase in teen prescription drug misuse
and abuse in 2012, the prevalence has remained stable at 23 percent
(lifetime use) for all teens in 2013. Although this dangerous behavior
concerns families across the nation, there is encouraging evidence of
behavioral and environmental trends that may help reduce teen mis-
use and abuse of prescription drugs in the future.
The first noteworthy trend is the favorable, albeit directional, move-
ment in misuse and abuse of leading opioids. Although this trend
is not statistically significant, the prevalence rate has incrementally
decreased over the past three years; currently 15 percent of teens
report having used the prescription pain relievers Vicodin or OxyCon-
tin without a prescription at some point in their lives. Almost nine in
ten teens (85 percent) also recognize the risk in misusing and abus-
ing prescription drugs on a regular basis, and teens are most likely to
cite “overdosing” as the single greatest risk in misusing and abusing
prescription drugs without a prescription – a real and potentially fatal
consequence.
Lastly, there has been a decline over the past five years in the per-
ceived accessibility of prescription opioids and peers’ use of opioids
without a prescription. Even though these trends hold for most other
substances, the declines for prescription opioids are among the more
salient.
Performance-Enhancing Substances
Over the past five years, approximately 5 to 6 percent of teens have
consistently said they used either synthetic human growth hormone
(hGH) or steroids without a prescription at least once within their
lifetime. In 2013, however, 11 percent of teens reported using synthetic
hGH at least once within their lifetime – a significant twofold increase
– and 7 percent of teens reported the same for steroids.
While it is doubtful that all 11 percent of teens who reported using
synthetic hGH actually obtained and used genuine synthetic human
growth hormone (which is administered via injection), the prolifera-
tion of commercially available and actively marketed products that
imply they contain synthetic hGH, or promote the natural production
of synthetic hGH within the body, makes it easy to understand why
teens believe they have used synthetic hGH.
More than one in five teens (22 percent) say they are aware of online
marketing efforts that try to sell steroids, synthetic hGH or other per-
formance-enhancing substances. This visibility in commercial settings
Teens may be using hGH
not only in an effort to
improve their athletic
performance, but also to
improve other aspects of
their lives, such as their
physical appearance.
9. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
may also be contributing to the fact that teens are now less likely to
believe that using synthetic hGH is a risky behavior compared to 2012.
Our data and analysis show, moreover, that teens may be using these
drugs not only in an effort to improve their athletic performance, but
also to improve other aspects of their lives, such as their physical ap-
pearance.
Other Noteworthy Trends in Teen Substance
Abuse
The 2013 PATS data show that most other substances measured have
remained relatively stable year-over-year, with the exception of alcohol.
Past-year and past-month alcohol use has declined to the lowest level
of prevalence seen in the past five years. However, this trend isn’t ac-
companied by a decrease in the perceived risk of alcohol consumption.
Moreover, teens are generally less likely to report having friends who
use substances, which is significant since teens are more likely to abuse
drugs and alcohol if their friends also engage in substance abuse.
Teens are also less likely to report having access to abusable substanc-
es. Notably, a few substances top this trend: over-the-counter cough
medicine, synthetic marijuana and bath salts. This may be attributed
in part to ongoing advocacy and legislative efforts that make it more
difficult for teens to access these substances.
Teens are less likely to
report having access to
abusable substances.
10. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS10
Teens say they are using marijuana mostly to “have fun” (50 percent),
to relax (48 percent) or to feel good (45 percent). And when asked if
they intend to use marijuana in the future, more than half of teens (56
percent) say they do not intend to do so, while the remaining say they
do intend to use marijuana in the future (22 percent) or are not sure of
their intent (23 percent).
DETAILED FINDINGS
Marijuana
Prevalence of Teen Marijuana Use
Almost half of teens (44 percent) report using marijuana at least once
within their lifetime; more than one in three (36 percent) report using
in the past year; one in four (24 percent) report using within the past
month; and 7 percent report using at least 20 times within the past
month. These levels have remained basically flat over the past five years.
Hispanic and African-American teens are also more likely to report us-
ing marijuana than their Caucasian counterparts (with 52 percent of
Hispanic teens, 54 percent of African-American teens, and 39 percent
of Caucasian teens indicating use).
Almost half of teens
(44 percent) report using
marijuana at least once
within their lifetime.
44%
49% 47%
45%
44%
38% 39% 39% 39% 36%
25% 25%
27%
24%
24%
8% 9% 9%
8%
7%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Prevalence of Teen Marijuana Use
% Used at Least Once (n=3705)
Daily (20+ per month)
Annual
Lifetime
Monthly
“(In your lifetime/in the past 12 months/in the past 30 days), how many times
have you used marijuana?”
11. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 11
Those who initiate
marijuana use at a younger
age are more likely to use
marijuana – as well as
other substances – more
frequently than those who
begin using at an older age.
More than four in ten teens (41 percent) who have used marijuana
started doing so before the age of 15. This is worrisome considering
that those who initiate marijuana use at a younger age are more likely
to use marijuana – as well as other substances – more frequently than
those who begin using at an older age.
Marijuana Attitudes and Behaviors
The perceptions of risk in experimenting with marijuana and using
marijuana frequently have fluctuated since 2009. Currently, seven in
ten teens (70 percent) see great or moderate risk in using marijuana
regularly, and four in ten (39 percent) see great or moderate risk in
using marijuana once or twice.
To help explain what these risks entail, the surveyed teens were given
a list of possible risks associated with marijuana use and were asked
to select the greatest risk that would deter them from using marijuana.
The majority of teens said “getting into trouble with the law” was the
greatest risk that would prevent them from using marijuana – which
% Great / Moderate Risk 2009 (A) 2010 (B) 2011 (C)
2012
(D) 2013 (E)
Trying marijuana once or twice 42% D 40% 42% D 37% 39%
Using marijuana regularly 74% BDE 68% 72% 69% 70%
Perception of Risk in Using Marijuana (n=3705)
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
“Which describes how much overall risk there is in …”
To have fun 50%
To help me relax 48%
Because being high feels good 45%
To help me forget my troubles 37%
To experiment 36%
To relieve boredom 33%
To deal with pressures and stress in school 30%
My friends are using 29%
To help deal with problems at home 27%
To feel better about myself 23%
To look cool 17%
It's a habit, I can't stop 16%
I don't know why I use 19%
Reasons for Using Marijuana (n=3705)
“[What was] the one main reason why you last used marijuana?”
12. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS12
As with marijuana prevalence rates, teens’ beliefs relating to marijua-
na generally show little fluctuation over the prior years (as indicated
by the chart below). Compared to 2012, teens are less likely to indi-
cate that they would use marijuana if it were legal (2013: 34 percent
vs. 2012: 38 percent) – even though, as we’ve seen, getting in trouble
with the law remains a deterrent in many teens’ minds.
More than one in ten teens (12 percent) continue to indicate their par-
ents would be okay with their marijuana use; three in ten (29 percent)
believe that most teens at their school don’t smoke marijuana; and
four in five teens (79 percent) say their parents discussed marijuana
use the last time they discussed the risks of drug use in a conversation
with them.
The majority of teens said
“getting into trouble with
the law” was the greatest
risk that would prevent
them from using marijuana
– which does reinforce the
view that legalization of
marijuana for recreational
use would lead to wider use
among teens.
does reinforce the view that legalization of marijuana for recreational
use would lead to wider use among teens. Teens said upsetting their
parents and losing motivation in school were also significant risks that
would prevent them from using marijuana.
The data also show that those who do not intend to use marijuana in
the future are more likely to associate marijuana use with addiction
and health complications, and those who are not sure of their intent
are more likely to cite losing motivation in school as a great risk (these
findings are depicted in the chart below). Similarly, those who have
not used marijuana at all are more likely to associate marijuana use
with addiction, health complications, compromising one’s future and
losing respect from their friends and family.
Do You Plan on Using
Marijuana in the Future?
Yes
(A)
No
(B)
I don’t know
(C)
Getting into trouble with law 42% 39% 44%
Upsetting your parents 34% 35% 37%
Losing motivation in school 30% 33% 40% A
Losing respect of friends and family 26% 32% 31%
Compromising your future 25% 33% A 29%
Becoming addicted 22% 33% A 27%
Changing your personality 23% 26% 24%
Impairing your judgment 21% 22% 23%
Endangering your health 15% 25% A 20%
Getting depressed 21% 19% 21%
Embarrassing yourself 17% 18% 18%
Overdosing 14% 17% 15%
None of these risks would prevent me 36% BC 13% 21% B
Specific Risks of Using Marijuana by
Intention to Use in the Future
(n=3705)
A-C indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
“What is the greatest risk that would prevent you from using marijuana?”
“Do you intend to use marijuana in the future?”
13. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 13
Marijuana and Alcohol Displacement
There has been much speculation that with marijuana legalization
teens will likely switch from consuming alcohol to marijuana. However,
our data show that there is a strong correlation between alcohol con-
sumption and marijuana use, meaning, that if a teen uses marijuana,
then he or she is more likely to consume alcohol than a teen who does
not smoke marijuana.
In addition to alcohol, those teens who use marijuana are generally
more likely to use other substances, especially cigarettes, synthetic
marijuana and prescription drugs.
Marijuana Use and Parental Intervention
It is well documented that social disapproval negatively correlates
with actual usage, and this is reflected in the new PATS data as well.
However, our data also show that the potential legalization of mari-
juana has a strong influence on the less frequent marijuana user – or
in other words, the illegal status of marijuana in most states may be
helping to prevent the occasional user from becoming a more frequent
user. Similarly, perceived parental permissiveness and perceived risk
in using marijuana regularly also has a strong influence on the more
frequent marijuana user.
This has important implications for the role parents can play in pre-
venting a child’s experimental, or infrequent, marijuana use from pro-
gressing to frequent use. In an environment where many teens don’t
perceive use of marijuana “once or twice” as risky, and fully one-third
of parents believe marijuana should be legal, it will be increasingly
difficult for parents to prevent experimentation among their kids. But
our data show that parents do wield enough influence to help prevent
Parents should effectively
communicate with their
teens about their disap-
proval of marijuana use,
and help explain why
regular marijuana use is a
behavior that comes with
serious consequences.
% Agree strongly / somewhat
2009
(A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
If marijuana were legal I would be
more likely to use it
- - 36% 38% E 34%
In my school, most teens don't
smoke marijuana
29% 28% 26% 26% 29%
My parents would be OK if I
smoked marijuana once in a while
- 11% 14% 14% 12%
% Yes
Discussed marijuana with parents 79% 77% 77% 81% 79%
Attitudes on Marijuana Use (n=3705)
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
“The last time one or both of your parents talked to you about drugs, what specific
drugs did they talk about?”
14. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS14
Teen misuse and abuse of Vicodin and OxyContin has directionally
declined over the past three years, even though the changes remain
statistically insignificant. In 2013, roughly one in seven teens (15
percent) report using Vicodin or OxyContin at least once in their
lifetime, and only one in eleven (9 percent) indicates misusing or
abusing these prescription opioids in the past year.
Misuse and abuse of
prescription medicine
continues to be the third
most prevalent drug abuse
behavior measured among
teens, following use of
marijuana and alcohol.
their teen from becoming a frequent user. To do so, parents should
effectively communicate with their teens about their disapproval of
marijuana use, and help explain why regular marijuana use is a behav-
ior that comes with serious consequences.
Medication Misuse and Abuse
Prevalence of Teen Misuse and Abuse of Prescription
Medicine
Misuse and abuse of prescription medicine continues to be the third
most prevalent drug abuse behavior measured among teens, following
use of marijuana and alcohol. Almost one in four teens (23 percent)
reports abusing or misusing a prescription drug at least once in their
lifetime, and one in six (16 percent) reports doing so within the past
year (as shown below). In addition, Hispanic and African-American
teens are more likely to report misusing or abusing prescription drugs
compared to their Caucasian counterparts (with 27 percent of Hispan-
ics, 29 percent of African-Americans and 20 percent of Caucasians
reporting use).
Annual
Lifetime
20%
22%
17%
24% 23%
18%
16%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Prevalence of Teen Prescription Drug Misuse and Abuse
% Used at Least Once (n=3705)
“(In your lifetime/in the past 12 months), how many times have you tried any
prescription drug (when a doctor did not prescribe it for you) in order for you to get
high or change your mood?”
15. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 15
Teen misuse and abuse of prescription stimulants has also remained
relatively stable over the past five years, with one in eight teens (12
percent) reporting misuse or abuse of Ritalin or Adderall at least once in
their lifetime, and one in twelve (8 percent) reporting misuse or abuse
within the past year.
One in eleven teens
indicates misusing or
abusing prescription opiods
in the past year.
One in twelve teens report
misusing or abusing Ritalin
or Adderall in the past year.
12%
13%
11%
13%
12%
9%
10%
7%
9%
8%
6%
6%
4%
6%
5%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Prevalence of Teen Ritalin / Adderall Misuse and Abuse
% Used at Least Once (n=3705)
“(In your lifetime/in the past 12 months/in the past 30 days), how many times have
you used the prescription drugs Ritalin or Adderall when a doctor did not prescribe it
for you?”
Annual
Monthly
Lifetime
17%
16% 15%
11%
10% 9%
6%
6%
5%
2011 2012 2013
Prevalence of Teen Vicodin/OxyContin Misuse and Abuse
% Used at Least Once (n=3705)
“(In your lifetime/in the past 12 months/in the past 30 days), how many times have
you used the prescription pain relievers VICODIN or OXYCONTIN when a doctor did not
prescribe it for you?”
Annual
Monthly
Lifetime
16. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS16
Teens who reported misusing or abusing a prescription drug were
asked for their main reason for last trying a prescription drug without
a prescription. Among this subset of teens, the majority said they did
so to relax (15 percent), experiment (15 percent), or to “have fun”
(14 percent).
Perception of Risk for Misuse and Abuse of
Prescription Drugs
Two-thirds of teens (67 percent) say there is great or moderate risk
in trying prescription drugs once or twice without a prescription, and
more than eight in ten teens (85 percent) say the same for using pre-
scription drugs regularly without a prescription. As shown in the chart
below, three in four teens (76 percent) say there is risk in trying pain
relievers, and another three in four (75 percent) say there is risk in
trying the prescription drugs Ritalin or Adderall. These measures have
fluctuated moderately over time.
Teens who reported
misusing or abusing a
prescription drug did so
to relax, experiment or
“have fun”.
To help me relax 15%
To experiment 15%
To have fun 14%
Because being high feels good 12%
To help me forget my troubles 12%
To deal with pressures and stress in school 9%
My friends are using 9%
To relieve boredom 8%
To help deal with problems at home 8%
It's a habit, I can't stop 8%
To feel better about myself 7%
To look cool 6%
I don't know why I use 9%
Reasons for Using Rx Drugs Without A Prescription
(n=3705)
“[What was] the one main reason why you last used a prescription
drug without a prescription?”
% Great / Moderate Risk
2009
(A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
Trying prescription pain
relievers without a prescription
78%
D
- 77% 74% 76%
Trying Adderall or Ritalin
without a prescription
79%
BE
74% 79% 77% 75%
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
“Which describes how much overall risk there is in …”
Perception of Risk in Using the Following Substances (n=3705)
17. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 17
Although two-thirds of teens (67 percent) see risk in trying prescrip-
tion drugs without a prescription once or twice, there is a higher level
of perceived risk associated with misusing and abusing prescription
medicines on a regular basis (85 percent). The only behaviors that
teens believe to be riskier are methamphetamine use (89 percent),
heroin use (89 percent), and cocaine or crack use (89 percent). In
fact, a similar proportion of teens see great or moderate risk in using
Ecstasy (85 percent).
Teens were also given a list of risks associated with using prescription
drugs without a prescription, and were then asked to select the great-
est risk that would prevent them from misusing or abusing prescrip-
tion drugs. Among these teens, half (50 percent) say the greatest
risk in using prescription drugs without a prescription is overdosing.
A distant second is endangering your health (30 percent) or becom-
ing addicted (30 percent). Interestingly, becoming addicted, getting
depressed and losing motivation in school are perceived to be greater
risks among those teens who have misused or abused prescription
drugs, compared to those who have not.
Half of teens (50 percent)
say the greatest risk in
using prescription drugs
without a prescription
is overdosing.
Overdosing 50%
Endangering your health 30%
Becoming addicted 30%
Getting depressed 27%
Compromising your future 25%
Losing respect of friends and family 23%
Changing your personality 22%
Upsetting your parents 22%
Getting into trouble with law 21%
Impairing your judgment 19%
Losing motivation in school 19%
Embarrassing yourself 12%
None of these risks would prevent me 10%
Specific Risks of Using Prescription Drugs
Without a Prescription (n=3705)
“What is the greatest risk that would prevent you from
using prescription drugs without a prescription?”
18. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS18
Teen Attitudes Toward Misuse and Abuse of
Prescripton Drugs
A notable proportion of teens report problematic attitudes regarding
misuse and abuse of prescription drugs. Almost one-third of teens (31
percent) believe prescription drugs can be used as study aids. Another
one-third (31 percent) believe it’s okay to take prescription drugs (with-
out having a prescription) to deal with an injury or pain, as long as they
are not getting “high,” and almost three in ten teens (29 percent) be-
lieve taking a larger dosage of prescription drugs that were prescribed
to them is okay as long as they were not doing so to get “high.”
Other concerning trends involve parents’ beliefs and behaviors and
the teens’ perceptions of those beliefs and behaviors. More than
one in five teens (22 percent) say parents would not care as much if
their teen were caught abusing or misusing prescription drugs, when
compared to illicit drugs. More than half of parents (55 percent) say
anyone can access their medicine cabinet, and almost three-quarters
of teens (73 percent) say it is easy to access prescription drugs from
their parents’ medicine cabinet. In fact, almost four in ten teens (38
percent) who have misused or abused a prescription drug have ob-
tained them from their parents’ medicine cabinet.
Some parents even have troubling perceptions regarding teen misuse
and abuse of prescription drugs, since more than two in ten parents
(21 percent) believe ADHD medications can improve a child’s aca-
demic performance, even if the child does not have ADHD. One in six
parents (16 percent) believes using prescription drugs to get high is
much safer than using illicit drugs; one in eight parents (13 percent)
believe it’s okay if their teen were to take a prescription drug without
a prescription; and one in ten (9 percent) believe it’s okay to do so if
their teen were reducing pain.
Environment and Teens’ Ease of Access to
Prescription Drugs
Teens believe prescription opioids and stimulants are easier to obtain
than any other illicit substance, with the exception of marijuana. Only
one-third of teens (33 percent) believe it’s hard to obtain prescription
opioids, and another one-third (32 percent) believe it’s hard to obtain
prescription stimulants. Importantly, though, teens are 32 percent more
likely to believe prescription opioids are hard to obtain than they were
five years ago, and 19 percent are more likely to believe the same for
prescription stimulants.
In fact, almost four in ten
teens (38 percent) who
have misused or abused
a prescription drug have
obtained them from their
parents’ medicine cabinet.
19. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 19
It should be noted that there is a strong relationship between the mis-
use and abuse of prescription opioids, having close friends who mis-
use and abuse prescription opioids, and the perception of accessibility
for these drugs. Interestingly, the relationship between having friends
who use and using yourself is stronger for stimulants than for opioids
or for prescription drugs in general. These data reinforce the anecdotal
evidence that the “sharing” of prescription stimulants can be a path to
misuse and abuse, more so than for other types of prescription drugs.
Another favorable trend has emerged regarding misuse and abuse of
prescription opioids, as only 32 percent of teens say they have friends
who engage in this risky behavior – a 26 percent decrease from 43
percent in 2009. Friends using prescription stimulants went from 34
percent in 2009 to 29 percent in 2013 (a less dramatic, 15 percent
decrease).
“Sharing” of prescription
stimulants can be a path to
misuse and abuse, more so
than for other types of
prescription drugs.
% Very / Fairly Difficult to Get 2009 (A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
Rx Pain Relievers without a
Prescription
25% 26% 30% A 29% 33% ABD
Rx Stimulants without a
Prescription
27% 29% 33% AD 29% 32% AD
Prescription Drugs Accessibility (n=3705)
“How difficult or easy do you think it would be for you to get each of the following:”
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
% Have Friends Who Misuse
or Abuse
2009
(A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
Rx Pain Relievers without a Prescription 43% DE 41% E 40% E 39% E 32%
Ritalin or Adderall without a
Prescription
34% E 33% 31% 32% 29%
“How many of your close friends, if any, do each of the following as far as you know?”
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Prescription Drugs Peer Misuse and Abuse (n=3705)
20. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS20
Prevalence of Over-the-Counter Cough Medicine
Abuse Among Teens
The lifetime prevalence of teen abuse of over-the-counter (OTC) cough
medicine has slightly increased from 12 percent of teens in 2012 to 15
percent of teens in 2013. Past-year use and past-month use of over-
the-counter cough medicine has remained relatively stable since the
prior year, with 7 percent and 5 percent indicating use, respectively.
Three in four teens (75 percent) perceive great or moderate risk in
abusing over-the-counter cough medicine, and among the teens who
report doing so, almost four in ten (38 percent) say they were 12 or 13
years old when they first abused OTC cough syrup.
Over the past few years, teens have reported that it is increasingly
difficult to obtain over-the-counter cough medicine, more so than any
other substance measured. Specifically, in 2010, only 13 percent of
teens found it difficult to obtain OTC cough medicine, and this propor-
tion increased markedly and consistently to 28 percent in 2013. This
may be due in part to age restrictions that have been put in place by
most chain drugstores, requiring proof that the buyer of over-the-
counter cough medicine be 18 years of age or older.
Monthly
Annual
12%
17% ACD
12%
12%
15% ACD
8%
11% CDE
7% 7% 7%
5%
6%
5%
4%
5%
2009 (A) 2010 (B) 2011 (C) 2012 (D) 2013 (E)
Prevalence of Teen OTC Cough Medicine Abuse
% Used at Least Once (n=3705)
“(In your lifetime/in the past 12 months/in the past 30 days), how many times have
you taken a non-prescription cough or cold medicine to get high?”
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Lifetime
Teens have reported that
it is increasingly difficult
to obtain over-the-counter
cough medicine, more so
than any other substance
measured.
21. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 21
Teens who report using synthetic hGH only once account for this
increase, indicating that the rise in use is possibly due to experimen-
tation; the proportion of adolescents who have used synthetic hGH
more than once in their lifetime has remained stable year-over-year.
African-American and Hispanic teens are more likely to report use of
synthetic hGH, with 15 percent of African-American teens, 13 percent
of Hispanic teens, and 9 percent of Caucasian teens saying they used
synthetic hGH at least once within their lifetime. Both boys and girls
report use of synthetic human growth hormone and steroids without a
prescription. The PATS study found no significant difference between
the proportions of teen boys (12 percent) vs. teen girls (9 percent),
who report using synthetic hGH.
In addition, our data show a strong correlation between the use of
synthetic hGH and steroids. Furthermore, those teens who have used
marijuana, smokeless tobacco or synthetic marijuana contributed
more to the recent increase in synthetic hGH use compared to those
teens who have used other types of substances.
Performance-Enhancing Substances
(Synthetic hGH and Steroids)
Teen Use of Performance-Enhancing Substances (PES)
More than one in ten teens (11 percent) report using synthetic human
growth hormone (hGH) at least once in their lifetime – a more than two-
fold increase since 2012. Prior to 2013, the prevalence rate for synthetic
hGH use among teens remained consistent at five percent for four years
(as indicated by the graph below). Teen use of steroids, on the other
hand, increased marginally from 5 percent to 7 percent over the past
five years – this trend is slight, but still statistically significant at the 95
percent confidence level.
5%
6%
5% 5%
11%
5%
6%
5% 5%
7%
2009 (A) 2010 (B) 2011 (C) 2012 (D) 2013 (E)
Prevalence of Teen Steroid / Synthetic hGH Abuse
% Used at least once in lifetime (n=3705)
“In your lifetime, how many times, if any, have you done each of the following.... used
(steroids/human growth hormone) for athletic performance or physical appearance
when a doctor did not prescribe them for you?
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Synthetic hGH
Steroids
A
ABCD
More than one in ten teens
(11 percent) report using
synthetic human growth
hormone (hGH) at least
once in their lifetime –
a more than two-fold
increase since 2012.
22. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS22
Teen Attitudes and Behaviors Related to PES Usage
Teens are less likely to believe there is great or moderate risk in using
performance-enhancing drugs compared to prior years, and those
who do not perceive synthetic hGH or steroid use as a risky behavior
are more likely to use these performance-enhancing substances. The
perception of risk teens associate with synthetic hGH use has signifi-
cantly decreased from 86 percent in 2012 to 81 percent in 2013. The
decrease for steroid risk is not as steep, but still statistically significant
when looked at over the past five years. In 2009, 85 percent of teens
said there was great or moderate risk in using steroids, and 82 percent
of teens currently share the same belief.
Although these recent trends are concerning, there are some favor-
able movements in other attitudes regarding performance-enhancing
drugs. Specifically, teens are less likely to agree with the statement
“knowing that some successful athletes use performance-enhancing
substances makes me more likely to use or consider using them”
compared to two years ago (17 percent in 2013 vs. 23 percent in 2011),
even though they are more likely to believe that professional athletes
use drugs (67 percent in 2013 vs. 61 percent in 2011). Even more tell-
ing, only 8 percent of teens agree that using performance-enhancing
substances in athletics is okay “if it’s the only way to win”, and this
percentage has continuously declined over the past five years. Lastly,
almost nine in ten teens (88 percent) continue to agree that steroids
can cause severe health problems.
Only eight percent of
teens agree that using
performance-enhancing
substances in athletics is
okay “if it’s the only way to
win”, and this percentage
has continuously declined
over the past five years.
% Great / Moderate
2009
(A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
hGH that a doctor did not prescribe to you NA NA NA 86%
E
81%
Steroids that a doctor did not prescribe
to you
85%
E
84% 84% 83% 82%
Perception of Risk in Using the Following Substances (n=3705)
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
“Which describes how much overall risk there is in …”
23. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 23
However, it should be noted that these attitudinal metrics are related
to athletic performance, and from our data, there is no statistically
significant difference in the athletic involvement between synthetic
hGH users and non-users. This suggests that the increase in reported
synthetic hGH use may be for reasons including, but not limited to,
athletics, such as improving physical appearance.
Awareness of Online Marketing for PES Among Teens
More than one in five teens (22 percent) are aware of online marketing
efforts that promote use of steroids, synthetic hGH or other perfor-
mance-enhancing drugs, and this measurement has fluctuated over
time (as depicted in the chart below). Those who use synthetic hGH
are also more likely to be aware of these online marketing efforts.
% Yes
2009
(A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
Awareness of Online Marketing 19% 21% 16% 17%
22%
CD
“Are you aware of efforts to sell you steroids, human growth hormone (hGH) or other
performance enhancing substances via the Internet?”
Awareness of Online Marketing of PES (n=3705)
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
The increase in reported
synthetic hGH use may be
for reasons including, but
not limited to, athletics,
such as improving physical
appearance.
% Agree Strongly / Somewhat 2009
(A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
Teens that use steroids for athletic
performance or physical appearance
can be at risk for severe health
problems
89% 89% 91% 89% 88%
Many professional athletes use drugs
sometimes
58% 60% 61% 61% 67%
ABCD
Knowing that some successful
athletes use PES makes me more
likely to use or consider using them
28%
CDE
23%
E
23%
E
19% 17%
It’s ok for a teen to use performance
enhancing drugs in athletics if it’s the
only way to win
17%
CDE
14%
E
13%
E
12%
E
8%
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Attitudes Related to PES Use (n=3705)
24. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS24
PES Environment and Parental Involvement
Amid these unfavorable trends in increased use of performance-en-
hancing substances among teens, there are noteworthy trends in the
perceived accessibility of steroids and peer use – similar to the trends
seen with other substances. Currently, one in five teens (21 percent)
reports that at least one friend uses steroids, and another one in five
teens (21 percent) believes it is easy to obtain steroids; both of these
measures improved in 2010 and have since remained consistent.
2009
(A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
% Have Friends Who Use Steroids 25% BE 18% 22% 22% 21%
% Very / Fairly Easy to Get Steroids 26% BCDE 20% 20% 19% 21%
Steroid Accessibility & Peer Use (n=3705)
“How many of your close friends, if any, do each of the following as far as you know?”
““How difficult or easy do you think it would be for you to get each of the following:”
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
More than half of parents (58 percent) report having discussed the
use of steroids or other performance-enhancing substances with their
teens, and only 3 percent of parents believe their teen has ever used
steroids or other performance-enhancing substances. The new PATS
data highlights a disconnect between parents and teens as only 12
percent of teens indicate that the last conversation they had with their
parents about the risks of drug use included talking about synthetic
hGH, and this measure has remained stable over the past five years.
Alcohol
Teen Alcohol Consumption
The latest PATS data show that fewer teens report drinking alcohol in
the past year or past month. Past-year alcohol use has declined signifi-
cantly versus last year, from 57 percent in 2012 to 51 percent in 2013,
and past-month alcohol use has declined gradually but significantly
from 39 percent in 2009 to 35 percent in 2013.
There are noteworthy
trends in the perceived
accessibility of steroids
and peer use – similar to
the trends seen with other
substances.
25. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 25
The perception of risk associated with alcohol use, however, has
remained relatively stable over the past four years. Six in ten teens
(60 percent) perceive risk in having one or two drinks nearly every
day, and roughly eight in ten teens perceive risk in having four or five
drinks nearly every day (81 percent) or drinking five or more drinks in
a row on one occasion (79 percent). More than one-third of teens (32
percent) believe their parents would say it’s okay for them to drink
beer every once in a while, while only 4 percent of parents corroborate
this statement.
Other Trends in Teen Substance Abuse
Teen Substance Abuse: Other Trends Revealed
As seen in the chart below, most of the remaining prevalence rates for
teen substance abuse have remained stable since 2009. One in six
teens (16 percent) continues to report using inhalants at least once in
their lifetime; one in eight (13 percent) reports using Ecstasy; one in ten
(11 percent) reports using cocaine/ crack; and one in twelve (8 percent)
reports using methamphetamine.
54% 53% 56% 57% E
51%
39% E
35% 38% 38%
35%
2009 (A) 2010 (B) 2011 (C) 2012 (D) 2013 (E)
Monthly
Annual
Prevalence of Teen Alcohol Consumption
% Used at Least Once (n=3705)
“In the past (12 months/30 days), how many times have you used alcohol?”
More than one-third of
teens (32 percent) believe
their parents would say it’s
okay for them to drink beer
every once in a while, while
only 4 percent of parents
corroborate this statement.
Lifetime Use –
% Used at least once 2009 (A) 2010 (B) 2011 (C) 2012 (D) 2013 (E)
Synthetic Marijuana - - - 17% 17%
Inhalants 17% 17% 15% 15% 16%
Ecstasy 13% 13% 13% 12% 13%
Cocaine / Crack 11% 11% 11% 9% 11%
Salvia - - - 8% 10%
Methamphetamine 7% 7% 7% 6% 8%
Bath Salts - - - 5% 7%
Heroin 5% 4% 4% 4% 6%
Prevalence of Teen Substance Abuse (n=3705)
“In your lifetime, how many times have you used the following substances…?”
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
26. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS26
Accessibility of Substances
More teens believe that it is difficult to obtain substances of abuse
(except for alcohol) compared to previous years. This change in
attitude is led by a 115 percent increase over a 3-year period in the
perceived difficulty of accessing over-the-counter cough medicine; an
85 percent increase over a one-year period for bath salts; and a 48
percent increase over a one-year period for synthetic marijuana.
It is difficult to know the extent to which these shifts reflect an ac-
tual decline in availability, a reduction in the number of teens actively
looking for specific substances of abuse, or a perceived decline in peer
usage. In the case of over-the-counter cough medicine, as indicated
above, a concerted effort to age-restrict the availability of OTC cough
medicine at retail may well have played a role.
% Difficult to Get
2009
(A)
2010
(B)
2011
(C)
2012
(D)
2013
(E)
Heroin - - - 42% 49% D
Meth 42% 42% 45% 44% 48% AB
Cocaine / Crack 35% 37% 42% A 41% A 46% ABD
Steroids 37% 42% 41% 40% 43% A
Ecstasy 35% 34% 39% 36% 40% AB
Bath Salts - - - 20% 37% D
Synthetic Marijuana - - - 23% 34% D
Rx Pain Relievers 25% 26% 30% A 29% 33% ABD
Rx Stimulants 27% 29% 33% AD 29% 32% AD
OTC Cough Medicine - 13% 22% B 22%B 28% BCD
Marijuana 15% 14% 18% D 13% 17% D
Alcohol - 11% 11% 10% 12%
Accessibility of Substances (n=3705)
“How difficult or easy do you think it would be for you to get each of the following:”
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Peer Substance Abuse
As seen from the following chart, there has been a decline in the num-
ber of teens who report having friends who abuse substances, except
for marijuana and alcohol. In fact, the number of teens who believe
their peers use marijuana has increased to 78 percent in 2013 after
relatively unchanged measures since 2009.
More teens believe that it is
difficult to obtain
substances of abuse
(except for alcohol)
compared to
previous years.
27. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
DETAILED FINDINGS 27
Parental Involvement and Attitudes
In the past, we have seen that parental monitoring is related to adoles-
cent drug abuse, and our data continue to support this, as teens who
report that their parents show concern for them and are monitoring their
behaviors are less likely to engage in substance abuse. Our data also
show that teens are less likely to use substances if they have learned a lot
about the risks of drug use from their parents or from schools.
Unfortunately, one-third of parents (34 percent) believe there is little
they can do to prevent their kids from trying drugs other than alcohol;
and one in four parents (23 percent) feel uncomfortable telling their
child not to use drugs because of their own history of drug use. Likewise,
among parents who suspect their child has used drugs or alcohol, one
in five (21 percent) have not intervene. But the role of parents is critical.
In fact, if a teen learns about the risks from his or her friends or “on the
street” rather than from parents, then that teen is more likely to engage
in substance use (as indicated by the graph below).
School Parents Friends On the Street
57%
38%
25%
14%
44%
31% 34%
21%
Learned About Risk of Drugs From Following Sources by Teen Drug Use
(% A lot) (n=3705)
Teens Who Do Not Use Drugs (n=1409) (A)
Teens Who Do Use Drugs (n=2087) (B)
A-B indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
“How much have you learned about the risks of drugs from each of the following:”
B
B A
A
% Have Friends Who Use 2009 (A) 2010 (B) 2011 (C) 2012 (D) 2013 (E)
Marijuana 72% 71% 73% 73% 78% ABCD
Alcohol once a week - 73% 79% B 76% 75%
Prescription Pain Relievers 43% DE 41% E 40% E 39% E 32%
Ecstasy 34% E 33% 32% 30% 29%
Prescription Stimulants 34% E 33% 31% 32% 29%
Synthetic Marijuana - - - 33% E 26%
OTC Cough Medicine 33% DE 31% E 32% E 28% E 24%
Cocaine / Crack 31% DE 27% 28% 25% 24%
Inhalants 28% E 29% E 28% E 26% 23%
Steroids 25% BE 18% 22% 22% 21%
Meth 21% DE 18% 19% 17% 16%
Heroin 18% DE 15% 17% E 14% 13%
Peer Use (n=3705)
“How many of your close friends, if any, do each of the following as far as you know?”
A-E indicates a significant difference at the 95% confidence level.
Teens who report that their
parents show concern for
them and are monitoring
their behaviors are less
likely to engage in
substance abuse.
28. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
IMPLICATIONS2828
Parents can play a crucial
role in preventing their
child from progressing
beyond experimental
(“once or twice” use) to
heavy use of marijuana.
Implications
Marijuana
The overall prevalence of teen use of marijuana reported in PATS has
been basically flat (no significant changes) over the past five years – in
spite of vocal support for legalization of marijuana during this period fol-
lowed by actual legalization in Colorado and Washington in November
of 2012. (There have been indications in other data sets of slight direc-
tional increases in use over this time frame.)
But there is ample cause for concern as we look more deeply at some of
the data relating to teen marijuana use, in particular:
a) Indications that legalization will lead to wider use by teens (more
than one-third of teens say that if marijuana were legal they’d be more
likely to use it).
b) No indication that marijuana use will “displace” alcohol use. On
the contrary, marijuana users are much more likely than non-users to
consume alcohol as well as cigarettes and other drugs – suggesting that
increased marijuana use will supplement rather than displace alcohol
use.
c) The significant number of frequent marijuana smokers (7 percent of
teens report they smoke at least 20 times per month), and early age of
reported first use (41 percent of teen smokers say they began before
the age of 15). This has deeply disturbing implications, both for teens’
academic performance (if you’re high every day, you’re not getting the
full benefit of education) and for long term problems: individuals who
begin using drugs or drinking in early adolescence are significantly more
likely to encounter problems (including addiction) in later life than those
who start after age 18.
There is important and encouraging news for parents, though, particu-
larly in those states where marijuana is now legal for recreational use
and potentially even more available to teens. Parents can play a crucial
role in preventing their child from progressing beyond experimental
(“once or twice” use) to heavy use of marijuana. They must make clear
–regardless of their own history or their opinions about legalization for
adults – that they disapprove of teens using marijuana and that regular
use comes with serious consequences.
For more information on marijuana and other substances, please visit drugfree.org.
Prescription Drugs
There is some evidence that, among teens at least, recent increases in
the misuse and abuse of prescription drugs have leveled off, and in the
case of leading opioids, prevalence appears to be decreasing. (These
29. Partnership for Drug-Free Kids I The Partnership Attitude Tracking Study I Teens & Parents 2013
IMPLICATIONS 2929
findings for teens are echoed in other national data sets as well.) It’s dif-
ficult to explain these declines in terms of increased risk perceptions (in
fact, perceived risk of misuse and abuse of stimulants is softening slightly);
what has changed dramatically is perceived accessibility among teens,
particularly for prescription pain relievers (from 25 percent of teens who
say pain relievers are “very” or “fairly” difficult to get in 2009 to 33 percent
in 2013). And in a possibly related development, we are seeing significant
declines in teens’ perceptions that peers are misusing or abusing prescrip-
tion pain relievers (and stimulants).
The implication for parents is that accessibility (or at least the perception
of accessibility) may matter a great deal in terms of teens’ actual misuse
and abuse of prescription medications – and parents are very much in a
position to influence accessibility via the home medicine cabinet. Safe-
guarding and properly disposing of unused medications are clearly impor-
tant prevention measures that parents can take.
To learn more about medicine abuse, including safeguarding, properly disposing unused
medications, and talking to kids about the dangers of misusing and abusing medicine,
please visit The Medicine Abuse Project at http://medicineabuseproject.org.
Synthetic Human Growth Hormone
The dramatic year-to-year increase in teens’ reported use of synthetic
human growth hormone (hGH) – from 5 percent to 11 percent – is cause
for concern, even if it’s unlikely that all 11 percent of teens who say they
used synthetic hGH actually did. Performance-enhancing substances
are seen as significantly less accessible than they were five years ago
and there appears to be less of a linkage between the highly publicized
behavior of professional athletes and teens’ decisions to use these sub-
stances. But we are seeing weaker risk perceptions among teens related
to performance-enhancing substances and increased awareness of
online marketing of such products.
A picture emerges of teens – both boys and girls – entering a largely
unregulated marketplace (online and in-store) in which performance-
enhancing substances of many varieties are aggressively promoted with
promises of improved muscle mass, performance and appearance. It’s
very difficult to know what exactly is in the substances teens are con-
suming, or what the short and long-term impact on their health may be.
The implication for parents, healthcare professionals, policy makers and
regulators is that this is an area of apparently growing interest and po-
tential danger to teens that cries out for stricter controls on manufacture
and marketing.
For more information regarding synthetic hGH, steroids, and other performance-enhanc-
ing substances, please visit http://playhealthy.drugfree.org/. The Play Healthy website is
sponsored by the Major League Baseball association, and provides resources to educate
young athletes, coaches and parents about performance-enhancing substances and their
risks.
Parents are very much in a
position to influence
accessibility via the home
medicine cabinet. Safe-
guarding and properly
disposing of unused
medications are clearly
important prevention mea-
sures that parents can take.
The largely unregulated
marketplace in which PES
are aggressively promoted
is an area of apparently
growing interest and po-
tential danger to teens that
cries out for stricter con-
trols on manufacture and
marketing.
30. 352 Park Avenue South, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10010
212-922-1560
www.drugfree.org