a review of management strategies with a quick Bangladesh FAP thrown in

1. Flood management strategies
•Hard engineering - dams, straightening, building up of
levees, diversion spillways.
• Soft engineering - forecasts and warnings, land use
management on floodplain, wetland and river bank
conservation and river restoration.

2. Flood management strategies

3. Flood Frequency
• How to calculate flood frequency:
• Size of largest flood for each year is ranked
with 1 being the largest for all available
records for any given year
T = n+1
m
T = Recurrence intervals
n = The number of years of observation
m = The rank Order

4. What does this tell us?
• It indicates the number of years within which a
flood of this size can be expected
• What problems can you see in this equation?
– It’s based on historical data
– It doesn’t mean floods can’t occur less or more
frequently
• The EA recommend that that flood defences
should be built to withstand a 1 in 50 year flood
• The EA however build flood defences for a 1 in a
100yr flood

5. Hard engineering -
dams, straightening, building up of
levees, diversion spillways.
• River channels evolve over time as they adjust to the Natural Flow Regime at Bank Full Discharge.
So why can’t human’s do that too? – this is called Channellisation.
• An extreme but perhaps necessary method is boxing or Culverting where the river is contained in
pipes, often underground. These solutions can cause flooding when they are blocked.
• Often a hard engineering solution to a flood threat will lead to problems further downstream.
Resectioning by creating smooth concrete channels will increase stream flow and greater erosion
rates further downstream. Includes Dredging
• Realignment (or Canalisation) = straightening of the river channel → ↑ downstream gradient and
cause channel bed erosion (↑ scour) → aggradation downstream → will need dredging.
• Environmental impact
– Concrete channels produced by hard engineering have a negative impact = they lack flow variability and
are often a sterile site for river weeds, insects, fish and birds.
• To prevent systematic problems along a whole river course, all new schemes are required to carry
out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and a Cost-Benefit Analysis before they can be
implemented. (see also Catchment Flood Management)

6. NEW THINKING ON RIVER
MANAGEMENT
• The EA has developed a new policy for flood plains (published in 1995), which seeks to control development in areas which
have a high risk of flooding, or where it would cause flood downstream.
• In the UK £250 million is spent every year constructing and maintaining flood defences and providing effective flood warning
for risk areas.
• Soft Engineering or Environmental Options for a river channel scheme include:-
– Restored natural river channel.
– Restored riparian zone with planted trees.
– Flood bank planted to create new wetland habitat.
– Flood embankments set back from river’s edge.
– Additional emergency flood plain embankment – may act as buffer.
– New wetland habitat of flood plain lake, water level controlled by sluice (Lydden Marsh, near Deal).
• Other options:-
– Provide Relief Channels which are constructed to divert high level flow away from the main channel leaving the natural channel
intact.
– Partial Dredging – A limited central section of the river is dredged or limited weed clearance takes place. This allows aquatic
bankside habitats to survive the increase in cross sectional area.
– Staggered Flood Banks are sometimes constructed on the edge of the Meander Belt to overcome the problem of lack of space.
– Two-Stage Channels can be created in the upper sections of the flood plain. The normal channel is used in low flow periods, but
during high flows the water is contained in newly excavated bends or storage reservoirs (see Ashford Flood Alleviation Scheme).
– Buffer Zones along the river margins can be used particularly where nitrate concentrations are very high next to the river. This
will also create a Wildlife Corridor (see aims of Kentish Stour Countryside Project).
• RESTORATION SCHEME
• A Restoration Scheme will involve a four point policy:-
• The establishment of a Model Image of the river (perhaps based on historical maps).
• A Feasibility Study involving a full survey of the catchment.
• A Pilot Project - perhaps of one meander.
• Final Design and permission requests.

7. Channelisation

8. Time to dredge?

9. Culverts – so natural!

10. Flood
Management in
Bangladesh

11. Background
Almost all of Bangladesh’s rivers have their origins outside the country.
The d.b. of the Ganges & Brahmaputra = 1.75 x 106 km2 (inc.
Himalayas, Tibetan Plateau & most of N. India.
Total rainfall within the Brahmaputra-Ganges-Meghna catchment is
large & very seasonal; 75% of annual rainfall occurs in the monsoon
(June to September)
Plus the Ganges and Brahmaputra carry snowmelt waters from the
high Himalayas which usually reach the delta in June and July.
Combined peak discharge = 100,000m3 per second (i.e. 100,000
cumecs)
In addition; vast quantities of sediment, which is periodically
deposited to form temporary islands (eyots) and sand banks.
River bed erosion may be rapid and extensive and shallow flooding of
the plains annually extends to hundreds of kilometres.

12. Background
• The land of Bangladesh has been formed by the
deposition of sediment from three great rivers - the
Meghna, the Brahmaputra and the Ganges.
• These sediments fan out and extend the country into the
Bay of Bengal. 80% of the country occupies one of the
largest delta systems in the world and is criss-crossed by
thousands distributaries (small rivers, creeks and canals)
• 66% of Bangladesh < one metre asl
• Climate change esp. the steric effect poses a huge risk to
the entire country.
• BUT Bangladesh poptn. Density is 1000 person.km- (cf UK
@ 255)

13. Flooding - The Benefits
• Living on flooded land is a way of life for millions of Bangladeshi
people.
• During the monsoon between 30 and 50% of the entire country
becomes flooded. The flood waters are used to:
– 1. replenish ground water reserves;
– 2. provide nutrient-rich sediment for vegetable production in the dry
– season;
– 3. provide a resource for aqua-culture - fish supply 75% of dietary
– protein and over 10% of annual export earnings;
– 4. provide ideal conditions for growth of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria
– (blue/green algae) which reduces the need for artificial fertilisers;
– 5. flush pollutants and pathogens away from domestic areas;
– 6. provides some micro-climatic control.

14. Flooding - The Causes
There are five well-documented causes of flooding in Bangladesh:
1. River floods. Snow melt in the high Himalayas combined with monsoonal rain leads to peak
discharges in all three of the major rivers which leads to deep flooding and complete destruction
of agriculture.
2. Outside the monsoon season, heavy rainfall on the hills and flood plains of Bangladesh and
adjacent areas in India also causes extensive flooding which is actually of great benefit to
agricultural production since it brings in new nutrients, removes pathogens and is used for rice
paddy.
3. Flash floods. These are caused by heavy rainfall in and flooding of Indian rivers, eg. Teesta River
in northern India. These are often exacerbated by the conversion of forest to row crops which
decreases interception, decreases water retention and increases the rate of surface run off.
4. Storm surge floods. These are caused by cyclones and hurricanes entering the Bay of Bengal.
The great storm surges which result destroy everything in their path.
5. Drainage congestion. Attempts to decrease flooding by building embankments and polders
have prevented the back flow of flood water into the river, actually causing drainage congestion
and back
flooding. In this way, embankments have sometimes led to the increase siltation of drainage
channels and this has created extensive and sometimes deep flooding. Precisely the same
problem is being cause by road embankments, constructed with little thought to their effect on
flood waters.

15. Flood Action Plan

16. The Flood Action Plan
The underlying principle is that it is quite impossible to stop Bangladesh flooding.
The aim, then, is to minimise the damage and maximise the benefits of the floodwaters
and to ensure that the discharges of the three great rivers reach the Bay of Bengal with
minimum harmful effect.
The Flood Action Plan relies upon huge embankments which are meant to run along the
length of the major rivers. However, they are not meant to be able to withstand the
catastrophic flooding incidents of, say 1987 and 1988, but are meant to provide some
control of flooding to give a more regular regime.
Thus, the embankments are fitted with sluices which can be used to reduce river flow
and hence, river bank erosion, and which can be used to control the speed of damage
caused by flooding.
The embankments are set back from the rivers, essentially to protect them from the
erosive power of the rivers. This has the advantage that they are cheap both to install
and to maintain and that the area between the river and embankment can be used for
cereal production. The area behind the embankment would be compartmentalised into
specially constructed compounds where the flood waters will be deliberately contained
and used, for example, for shrimp production.

17. The Flood Action Plan
• Despite the fact that millions of pounds of foreign aid have now been
diverted into embankment construction, opposition to this form of flood
control is increasing. The most serious criticisms of this approach are:
– 1. Embankments effectively increase the period of inundation, since they
prevent back flow into the rivers. Ironically, then, flood water damage may be
greater after embankments have been constructed.
– 2. When the embankments are breached, damage will be greater because of the
sudden nature of the inundation which is more harmful than gradual
inundation. This was meant to have been prevented by the sluices, but in
practice insufficient sluices have been built and there have been long-running
arguments about who should control the sluices.
– 3. Sudden breaches of the embankments may also deposit deep layers of
infertile river sand over the land, dramatically decreasing fertility.
– 4. No research has been carried out on what effect this new hydrological
regime will have on nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria. Reduced nitrogen
fixation may lead to increased need for artificial nitrogen fertilisers.

18. The Flood Action Plan
– 5. Compartmentalisation may reduce the flushing effect of the flood
waters, increasing the concentration of pollutants from domestic effluents and
agro-chemicals.
– 6. By preventing back flow to the river, areas of stagnant water will be created
which may increase the likelihood of diseases such as cholera.
– 7. Embankments may cause some wetlands to dry out, leading to a loss of
biodiversity.
– 8. There may be a decrease in dry season water flows and a reduction in
ground water recharge.
– 9. Decreased flooding will decrease 'capture fishery', which many of the poor
rely upon as their major source of protein. Aqua-culture based upon the
compartments is likely to use a much reduced diversity of fish which may have
harmful nutritional effects
– 10. Land acquisition for the construction of the embankments will lead to
displacement of people and, since the majority of people are landless and
depend on common property resources such as wetlands, a major concern is
that such people will not have access to fishing grounds at all

19. The Flood Action Plan
Conclusion
The hydrology of Bangladesh is controlled by factors that are outside of its
boundaries. The economy of, and way of life in Bangladesh is dependent upon
year-round flooding and although it is essential that catastrophic events are
avoided, agriculture and a large percentage of export earnings are dependent
upon inundation for long periods of the year.
There is little agreement among the international aid agencies as to how the
peak discharges of the three great rivers, the Meghna, the Brahmaputra and
the Ganges, can be controlled, but the current Flood Action Plan relies upon
the establishment of a series of embankments which, although not designed
to withstand catastrophic flood events, are meant to give villages control over
the speed of most flooding events.
However, this approach has many critics who believe that establishment of
embankments along thousands of miles of these rivers will cause serious
social, economic and environmental problems.