Ethical Considerations in Public Health
Overview  Ethical principles in public health Research vs. non-research activities Public health
Factors affecting public health ethics
Ethical Values
KEY ISSUES IN PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS
Disparities in health status, access to • health care and to the benefits of medical research  –  For example, questions about resource allocation depend in part on value judgments about the relative importance of small improvements in quality of life for a large portion of the population as compared with a life-saving intervention that would benefit only a few people.
Responding to the threat of infectious diseases  –  Efforts to contain the spread of infectious diseases raise difficult questions about the appropriateness of restricting individual choices to safeguard other people’s welfare. Examples include the use of isolation and quarantine for tuberculosis and pandemic influenza.
International cooperation in health monitoring and surveillance  –  The implementation of the International Health Regulations4 reflects the commitment of countries to collective action in the face of public-health emergencies.  Defining the scope of countries’ obligations to act collectively, and determining how those obligations should be enforced, will inevitably raise difficult ethical dilemmas.
Exploitation of individuals –  Current practices in medical research, for example, may expose participants to significant risks without a benefit for themselves or their communities.  In the area of organ transplantation, the growing practice of “transplant tourism” exposes individuals living in poverty to significant health risks.
Health Promotion The growing public-health threats of noncommunicable diseases, including those caused in part by unhealthy behaviours such as smoking, poor diet or lack of exercise, have raised the question of the extent to which public-health authorities should interfere with personal choices on health.
Participation, transparency, and accountability  –  As an ethical matter, the process by which decisions are made is as important as the outcome of the decisions.  Strengthening systems for informed consent and community oversight.  To develop mechanisms for evaluating their effectiveness.
RESEARCH VS. SURVEILLANCE AND OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICES From presentation by  Alex John London Ph.D. Associate Professor of Philosophy & Director
Ethical Forrest, Regulatory Trees Ethical, regulatory, and legal categories –  Research, Public Health Practice, Emergency Response May give clues to relevant ethical issues. –  But activities in different categories can raise similar issues. –  Activities in the same category can be very dissimilar. Primary value: specifying which ethical, regulatory or legal  processes will be used to  address ethical issues that do arise.
Research Activities •   Some Common Ethical Tensions: –  Interests of present participants •  Privacy, autonomy •  Avoidance of harm, receiving optimal diagnosis, treatment, prevention –  Demands of sound science to generate generalizable knowledge. •  Collection of potentially sensitive data •  Limitations on autonomy (blinding, randomization) •  Study-related procedures (extra tests, opportunity costs, controls…) –  Interests of community: •  Reducing uncertainty. •  Improving the standard of care for future recipients. •  Respecting the rights and welfare of all community members. •  Oversight mechanisms: –  IRB/REBs
(Routine) Public Health Practice •  Some Common Ethical Tensions: –  Community interests •  Eliminating uncertainty about disease prevalence, severity… •  Preventing, mitigating, halting spread of contagion •  Robust and resilient health infrastructure to cope with diverse determinants of health and threats to health. –  Interests of individuals •  Avoidance of harm, burden or risk (Free rider incentives) •  Privacy •  Individual liberty, autonomy •  Oversight mechanisms: –  Public health authorities, law, courts
What is an epidemiological surveillance system? The systematic collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of health data on an ongoing basis, to gain knowledge of the pattern of disease occurrence and potential in a community, in order to control and prevent disease in the community. Epidemiological surveillance is a process of watchfulness over health events which may occur in a population.  A set of interconnected elements and activities that are usually established as an integral part of a health care system in order to monitor priority health events. Ghaiath Surveillance (JPFCM, Jan. 2010)
Surveillance: General principle   Health Care System Public Health Authority Data Information Decision Action Feedback Reporting Evaluation Analysis & Interpretation Ghaiath Surveillance (JPFCM, Jan. 2010)
Research vs. non-research activities Research Non-research (surveillance) Goal Producing generalizable knowledge Monitoring & evaluation Population Limited, selected by investigator Public, large groups Time Limited by the time of study Usually ongoing Objective Test hypothesis No hypothesis tested Owners Researchers, funders Public health authorities Methods Novel, not always validated Validated Outcomes Knowledge, product PH intervention Review IRB/REB/REC review Usually none Ethical issues Consent, privacy and confidentiality, access to benefit,  Privacy and confidentiality, human rights, infringement to liberty
Surveillance as Research •  Collection of additional information to what is necessary for public health responsibilities in the population from which data is collected. •  Goal is to clarify general features of a pathogen or problem. •  Research methods are employed to permit generalization of data to other populations.
RESEARCHING THE QUARANTINED AND ISOLATED From Jerome Singh
Researching contagious diseases in the confined •  Isolation  –  the separation and confinement of those who are infected from the uninfected. •  Quarantine  the separation and confinement of those who have been exposed to infected people but who are not confirmed to have been infected, from the uninfected.
Challenges •  Legal International law Local laws Human rights International human rights Local human rights
Ethical Challenges
Cultural and Social Challenges Group identity: This is one reason why observational research or questionnaires can also involve risks. Risks run by communities are not simply aggregates of individual risks. Examples: stigmatisation, disruption of group structures, hijacking group resources, or health care providers… This was realized rather later than the other risks
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
Community Consent –  To know community priorities –  To inform individuals better –  To respect the structures that are in place and obtain permission to ask individual potential subjects for consent –  To determine ways to collaborate with local health care providers Diallo D., Doumbo O., Plowe C., Wellems Th., Emanuel E, Hurst S.: Community Permission for Research in Developing Countries.  Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005,  41(2), pp 255-9
Practical considerations
Practical considerations Research ethics review should be conducted by independent and accountable boards  Inter-jurisdictional issues should be anticipated given the likely international nature of research endeavours Special attention should be given to ensure appropriate evaluation of the risks and potential benefits of any proposed research (including any possible increase in vulnerability of prospective research participants)
Practical considerations Duplication Overburdening/ Over-investigating population Need for Registry? How to manage existing research protocols/reviews Risks to research workers
DISCUSSION

Ethical Considerations in Public Health

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Overview Ethicalprinciples in public health Research vs. non-research activities Public health
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
    KEY ISSUES INPUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS
  • 6.
    Disparities in healthstatus, access to • health care and to the benefits of medical research – For example, questions about resource allocation depend in part on value judgments about the relative importance of small improvements in quality of life for a large portion of the population as compared with a life-saving intervention that would benefit only a few people.
  • 7.
    Responding to thethreat of infectious diseases – Efforts to contain the spread of infectious diseases raise difficult questions about the appropriateness of restricting individual choices to safeguard other people’s welfare. Examples include the use of isolation and quarantine for tuberculosis and pandemic influenza.
  • 8.
    International cooperation inhealth monitoring and surveillance – The implementation of the International Health Regulations4 reflects the commitment of countries to collective action in the face of public-health emergencies. Defining the scope of countries’ obligations to act collectively, and determining how those obligations should be enforced, will inevitably raise difficult ethical dilemmas.
  • 9.
    Exploitation of individuals– Current practices in medical research, for example, may expose participants to significant risks without a benefit for themselves or their communities. In the area of organ transplantation, the growing practice of “transplant tourism” exposes individuals living in poverty to significant health risks.
  • 10.
    Health Promotion Thegrowing public-health threats of noncommunicable diseases, including those caused in part by unhealthy behaviours such as smoking, poor diet or lack of exercise, have raised the question of the extent to which public-health authorities should interfere with personal choices on health.
  • 11.
    Participation, transparency, andaccountability – As an ethical matter, the process by which decisions are made is as important as the outcome of the decisions. Strengthening systems for informed consent and community oversight. To develop mechanisms for evaluating their effectiveness.
  • 12.
    RESEARCH VS. SURVEILLANCEAND OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICES From presentation by Alex John London Ph.D. Associate Professor of Philosophy & Director
  • 13.
    Ethical Forrest, RegulatoryTrees Ethical, regulatory, and legal categories – Research, Public Health Practice, Emergency Response May give clues to relevant ethical issues. – But activities in different categories can raise similar issues. – Activities in the same category can be very dissimilar. Primary value: specifying which ethical, regulatory or legal processes will be used to address ethical issues that do arise.
  • 14.
    Research Activities • Some Common Ethical Tensions: – Interests of present participants • Privacy, autonomy • Avoidance of harm, receiving optimal diagnosis, treatment, prevention – Demands of sound science to generate generalizable knowledge. • Collection of potentially sensitive data • Limitations on autonomy (blinding, randomization) • Study-related procedures (extra tests, opportunity costs, controls…) – Interests of community: • Reducing uncertainty. • Improving the standard of care for future recipients. • Respecting the rights and welfare of all community members. • Oversight mechanisms: – IRB/REBs
  • 15.
    (Routine) Public HealthPractice • Some Common Ethical Tensions: – Community interests • Eliminating uncertainty about disease prevalence, severity… • Preventing, mitigating, halting spread of contagion • Robust and resilient health infrastructure to cope with diverse determinants of health and threats to health. – Interests of individuals • Avoidance of harm, burden or risk (Free rider incentives) • Privacy • Individual liberty, autonomy • Oversight mechanisms: – Public health authorities, law, courts
  • 16.
    What is anepidemiological surveillance system? The systematic collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of health data on an ongoing basis, to gain knowledge of the pattern of disease occurrence and potential in a community, in order to control and prevent disease in the community. Epidemiological surveillance is a process of watchfulness over health events which may occur in a population. A set of interconnected elements and activities that are usually established as an integral part of a health care system in order to monitor priority health events. Ghaiath Surveillance (JPFCM, Jan. 2010)
  • 17.
    Surveillance: General principle Health Care System Public Health Authority Data Information Decision Action Feedback Reporting Evaluation Analysis & Interpretation Ghaiath Surveillance (JPFCM, Jan. 2010)
  • 18.
    Research vs. non-researchactivities Research Non-research (surveillance) Goal Producing generalizable knowledge Monitoring & evaluation Population Limited, selected by investigator Public, large groups Time Limited by the time of study Usually ongoing Objective Test hypothesis No hypothesis tested Owners Researchers, funders Public health authorities Methods Novel, not always validated Validated Outcomes Knowledge, product PH intervention Review IRB/REB/REC review Usually none Ethical issues Consent, privacy and confidentiality, access to benefit, Privacy and confidentiality, human rights, infringement to liberty
  • 19.
    Surveillance as Research• Collection of additional information to what is necessary for public health responsibilities in the population from which data is collected. • Goal is to clarify general features of a pathogen or problem. • Research methods are employed to permit generalization of data to other populations.
  • 20.
    RESEARCHING THE QUARANTINEDAND ISOLATED From Jerome Singh
  • 21.
    Researching contagious diseasesin the confined • Isolation – the separation and confinement of those who are infected from the uninfected. • Quarantine the separation and confinement of those who have been exposed to infected people but who are not confirmed to have been infected, from the uninfected.
  • 22.
    Challenges • Legal International law Local laws Human rights International human rights Local human rights
  • 23.
  • 24.
    Cultural and SocialChallenges Group identity: This is one reason why observational research or questionnaires can also involve risks. Risks run by communities are not simply aggregates of individual risks. Examples: stigmatisation, disruption of group structures, hijacking group resources, or health care providers… This was realized rather later than the other risks
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Community Consent – To know community priorities – To inform individuals better – To respect the structures that are in place and obtain permission to ask individual potential subjects for consent – To determine ways to collaborate with local health care providers Diallo D., Doumbo O., Plowe C., Wellems Th., Emanuel E, Hurst S.: Community Permission for Research in Developing Countries. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2005, 41(2), pp 255-9
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Practical considerations Researchethics review should be conducted by independent and accountable boards Inter-jurisdictional issues should be anticipated given the likely international nature of research endeavours Special attention should be given to ensure appropriate evaluation of the risks and potential benefits of any proposed research (including any possible increase in vulnerability of prospective research participants)
  • 29.
    Practical considerations DuplicationOverburdening/ Over-investigating population Need for Registry? How to manage existing research protocols/reviews Risks to research workers
  • 30.