The document discusses different types of definitions including formal, informal, and extended definitions. It explains that a definition should have three parts: the term being defined, its classification, and identifying characteristics. Good definitions are precise, not vague, and allow terms to be clearly understood. Definitions help improve communication and decision making by promoting shared understanding.
Coherence refers to how well ideas flow and connect smoothly from one sentence or paragraph to the next in a logical manner. Coherence in writing can be achieved through techniques like using repetition of key words, transitional expressions, pronouns, synonyms, and parallel structures to link ideas and create a smooth flow of information for the reader. Maintaining coherence is important at both the paragraph and whole text level to ensure the reader can easily understand and follow the overall argument or discussion.
Coherence refers to how well ideas flow smoothly from one sentence to the next in writing. In linguistics, coherence makes a text semantically meaningful by connecting ideas. For a paragraph to be coherent, the words, phrases and sentences must move logically from one to another so the reader understands the consistent relationship between ideas. Coherence comes from ideas fitting together in a logical and complete way with supporting facts. A coherent paragraph also maintains unity with a single topic throughout and a logical flow of information both within and between paragraphs.
The document discusses reading and writing skills, defining key terms like text, hypertext, hypotext, and hyperlink. A text is a piece of written or spoken material in its primary form, from a single word to a novel. A hypotext is an original work that hypertexts derive from or relate to, like Homer's Odyssey inspiring James Joyce's Ulysses. Hypertext presents information non-linearly and allows readers to access additional context through linked references. Hyperlinks are highlighted words or buttons in a website that redirect the reader when clicked.
This document discusses categorical propositions and their forms. There are four standard forms of categorical propositions: universal affirmative, universal negative, particular affirmative, and particular negative. Each proposition has a quality (affirmative or negative), quantity (universal or particular), and distribution (the classes designated by the subject and predicate terms). The relationships between the forms are organized in the traditional square of opposition, where propositions can be contradictories, contraries, subcontraries, or correspond with each other based on their qualities and quantities.
“A syllogism is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.” Wikipedia contributors. "Syllogism." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 7 Jun. 2015. Web. 14 Jun. 2015
This document discusses categorical propositions and their components. It defines categorical propositions as statements that relate two classes or categories by asserting that all or some of one class is included in or excluded from the other class. Categorical propositions have four components - the quantifier, subject term, copula, and predicate term. They also have attributes of quality, quantity, and distribution. Quality is either affirmative or negative, quantity is either universal or particular, and distribution determines if a term makes an assertion about every member of a class. Standard form categorical propositions clearly express these relationships between classes.
This document provides information about different citation styles (MLA, APA, Chicago) and best practices for research and writing. It discusses how to properly cite sources using quotes and paraphrases in each style. Key differences between the styles are highlighted such as use of title pages, headings, and formatting of in-text citations and reference lists. Tips are provided for conducting online research and evaluating source credibility. The document emphasizes avoiding plagiarism and properly citing all sources of information that is not common knowledge.
Coherence refers to how well ideas flow and connect smoothly from one sentence or paragraph to the next in a logical manner. Coherence in writing can be achieved through techniques like using repetition of key words, transitional expressions, pronouns, synonyms, and parallel structures to link ideas and create a smooth flow of information for the reader. Maintaining coherence is important at both the paragraph and whole text level to ensure the reader can easily understand and follow the overall argument or discussion.
Coherence refers to how well ideas flow smoothly from one sentence to the next in writing. In linguistics, coherence makes a text semantically meaningful by connecting ideas. For a paragraph to be coherent, the words, phrases and sentences must move logically from one to another so the reader understands the consistent relationship between ideas. Coherence comes from ideas fitting together in a logical and complete way with supporting facts. A coherent paragraph also maintains unity with a single topic throughout and a logical flow of information both within and between paragraphs.
The document discusses reading and writing skills, defining key terms like text, hypertext, hypotext, and hyperlink. A text is a piece of written or spoken material in its primary form, from a single word to a novel. A hypotext is an original work that hypertexts derive from or relate to, like Homer's Odyssey inspiring James Joyce's Ulysses. Hypertext presents information non-linearly and allows readers to access additional context through linked references. Hyperlinks are highlighted words or buttons in a website that redirect the reader when clicked.
This document discusses categorical propositions and their forms. There are four standard forms of categorical propositions: universal affirmative, universal negative, particular affirmative, and particular negative. Each proposition has a quality (affirmative or negative), quantity (universal or particular), and distribution (the classes designated by the subject and predicate terms). The relationships between the forms are organized in the traditional square of opposition, where propositions can be contradictories, contraries, subcontraries, or correspond with each other based on their qualities and quantities.
“A syllogism is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.” Wikipedia contributors. "Syllogism." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 7 Jun. 2015. Web. 14 Jun. 2015
This document discusses categorical propositions and their components. It defines categorical propositions as statements that relate two classes or categories by asserting that all or some of one class is included in or excluded from the other class. Categorical propositions have four components - the quantifier, subject term, copula, and predicate term. They also have attributes of quality, quantity, and distribution. Quality is either affirmative or negative, quantity is either universal or particular, and distribution determines if a term makes an assertion about every member of a class. Standard form categorical propositions clearly express these relationships between classes.
This document provides information about different citation styles (MLA, APA, Chicago) and best practices for research and writing. It discusses how to properly cite sources using quotes and paraphrases in each style. Key differences between the styles are highlighted such as use of title pages, headings, and formatting of in-text citations and reference lists. Tips are provided for conducting online research and evaluating source credibility. The document emphasizes avoiding plagiarism and properly citing all sources of information that is not common knowledge.
This document provides an overview of common types of fallacies, which are misleading or deceptive arguments. It discusses four major categories of fallacies: fallacies of relevance, fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and formal fallacies. For each category, it provides examples and explanations of specific fallacies such as ad hominem attacks, slippery slope arguments, equivocation, affirming the consequent, and more.
1.1 arguments, premises, and conclusionsSaqlain Akram
Formal Logic : Leacture 01
Chapter 1: Basic Concepts
1.1 Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
Follow on Facebook:
https://web.facebook.com/learnforgood...
and on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8kUyEAA5ix6Bl5H5gKXo3A
Like, Comment and Share.
Also Subscribe For More Videos.
Learn For Good.
This document provides an overview of rhetorical analysis and its key components. It defines rhetoric as persuasive communication and examines an author's audience, purpose, genre, argument components like claims and evidence, and types of evidence. The document instructs readers to analyze how an argument is made through its rhetorical elements, not just the topic itself.
The document discusses different types of fallacies, or flawed arguments. It begins by defining a fallacy as an argument that uses poor reasoning, whether or not the conclusion is true. Fallacies can be formal, stemming from logical flaws, or informal. The document then examines different types of formal and informal fallacies identified by Aristotle, Richard Whately, and others. It provides examples of intentional and unintentional fallacies, as well as deductive fallacies. Specific fallacies like appeal to pity, scare tactics, and two wrongs making a right are explored in more depth.
This document provides guidance on writing a formal argumentative essay. It discusses the key components of an argumentative essay including the introduction, body, and conclusion. The body should include multiple arguments supported by evidence. One should anticipate and refute counterarguments. Formal language requires an objective tone without informal language or contractions. Paragraphs need topic sentences, and coherence is created through linking words.
This document discusses the seven types of meaning in semantics according to Geoffrey Leech:
1. Conceptual meaning refers to the literal or dictionary definition of a word.
2. Connotative meaning involves the social and cultural values associated with a word.
3. Social meaning depends on aspects of society and dialect.
4. Affective meaning refers to the emotions and attitudes conveyed.
5. Reflective meaning involves multiple conceptual meanings from a single sense.
6. Collocative meaning consists of associations acquired based on common words in the environment.
7. Thematic meaning is communicated through how the message is organized, ordered and emphasized.
This document provides an introduction to critical thinking and the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. It defines logic and reasoning, and explains that deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Examples of each type of reasoning are provided. The key differences are that deductive reasoning establishes absolute truths if the premises are true, while inductive reasoning reaches tentative conclusions.
This document discusses the three main techniques of persuasion: ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos involves establishing credibility and trustworthiness. Logos uses facts, statistics, and logical reasoning to persuade. Pathos appeals to emotions such as fear, sadness, nostalgia, and humor. Together, these techniques - establishing credibility, using facts and logic, and appealing to emotions - are commonly employed in advertising to influence audiences.
This document provides an overview of I.A. Richards' seminal work "The Meaning of Meaning". It summarizes that Richards, along with Ogden, developed a triadic theory of semiotics that influenced Richards' later literary criticism. The document also defines meaning, discusses the "proper meaning" superstition, and outlines Richards' semantic triangle model and his proposed linguistic remedies for misunderstanding such as definition, metaphor, feedforward, and Basic English.
The document discusses what makes an effective paragraph. It notes that effective paragraphs have unity, coherence, and adequate development. They contain a clear topic sentence that states the main idea. All sentences in the paragraph should be logically connected and relate back to the topic sentence. Transitional words, pronouns, repetition of key terms, and parallel structures are used to ensure coherence between sentences. A paragraph should also have sufficient examples, details, facts, or other information to fully develop the main idea.
1. The document discusses the key concepts of logic including arguments, propositions, premises, conclusions and the validity of arguments.
2. It provides examples to illustrate inductive and deductive arguments, and distinguishes between arguments and explanations.
3. Arguments are considered valid if the truth of the premises necessarily implies the truth of the conclusion, while invalid arguments can have true premises and conclusions but the conclusion does not logically follow.
The document discusses students debating whether to add a 7th grade to the elementary curriculum. Student 1 and 2 argue it is a waste of money, while Student 4 says it would improve the curriculum like in Japan and Korea. Student 5 disagrees, stating those countries emphasize science, technology and math instead. Student 5 and 6 agree that improving technology and facilities in schools would better prepare students. The document also lists expressions used to directly agree, disagree, or disagree in a more softened way in a discussion.
This document discusses different types of meaning in language. It outlines seven types of conceptual meaning: 1) conceptual or denotative meaning, 2) connotative meaning, 3) social meaning, 4) affective or emotive meaning, 5) reflected meaning, 6) collocative meaning, and 7) thematic meaning. It also discusses literal and figurative meaning, and explains how sentence meaning differs from speaker meaning. Finally, it describes Ogden and Richards' theory of symbols and meaning, including their semantic triangle model of the relationships between symbols, thoughts, and referents.
An argument is a logical structure with premises that lead to a conclusion. Arguments can be evaluated based on validity, truth, and soundness. Validity means the conclusion follows logically from the premises. An argument is sound if it is valid and all premises are true. Inductive and deductive reasoning differ in strengths and weaknesses. Inductive relies on experience while deductive accepts fixed definitions, but may lead to apparently necessary but false conclusions. Fallacies and counterarguments should be considered when critically evaluating arguments.
This document discusses intertextuality and how it functions as a literary technique in drama. It defines intertextuality as the connections between related works of literature that influence interpretation. Various intertextual figures are described, including allusion, quotation, calque, translation, parody, pastiche, appropriation, and adaptation. Steps for identifying and analyzing intertextuality in a text are provided. Archetypes are also discussed as inherently intertextual, with examples like Superman and Hercules both possessing superhuman strength.
This document provides definitions and guidelines for proper use of mechanics in composition, including capitalization, punctuation, pronouns, and abbreviations. It defines mechanics as the technical conventions of writing, such as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Specific rules and examples are given for capitalizing proper nouns and abbreviations. Guidelines are also given for using punctuation like apostrophes, commas, and periods correctly. The document advises avoiding unclear pronouns and recommends style guidelines for contractions.
This document provides guidance on using quotations in writing. It discusses direct quotes, which use the exact words from a source and are enclosed in quotation marks. It also covers indirect quotes, which paraphrase a source, and partial quotes. The document explains how to introduce and integrate quotes into sentences and discusses punctuation rules for quotes. It provides examples of direct, indirect, and partial quotes and how to format longer block quotes.
The document provides instructions for writing a definition in 3 parts: [1] The term being defined, [2] The group or concept the term belongs to, and [3] The distinguishing characteristics of the term. An example definition is given for the term "water" as a liquid made up of hydrogen and oxygen molecules. Readers are encouraged to follow this three-step process to write their own definitions.
This document discusses the structure and elements of categorical propositions in Aristotelian logic. It explains that categorical propositions are constructed using a subject category and predicate category, and the copula indicates the relationship between the two categories. However, propositions can be ambiguous without specifying the quantity, or how much of the subject is included in the predicate. The document presents the four categorical forms - A, E, I, and O propositions - which specify universal or particular quantity and affirmative or negative quality to remove ambiguity. It provides examples and exercises to illustrate the application of these forms.
This document discusses definitions and their rules. It begins by explaining that a definition is a statement that answers the question "what is this thing?" and comes from the Latin word "definire" meaning "to lay down." There are different types of definitions including biverbal, stipulative, lexical, and ostensive/extensive. The document outlines four main rules of definitions: 1) a definition must be clearer than the term defined, 2) it cannot contain the term being defined, 3) it must be convertible with the term, and 4) it should be positive rather than negative whenever possible.
This document provides a mini guide to critical thinking. It introduces key concepts like meaning, definitions, necessary and sufficient conditions, and linguistic pitfalls like ambiguity and vagueness. The guide is divided into sections covering these concepts and how they relate to critical thinking. It aims to highlight important principles in a brief yet accessible way.
This document provides an overview of common types of fallacies, which are misleading or deceptive arguments. It discusses four major categories of fallacies: fallacies of relevance, fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and formal fallacies. For each category, it provides examples and explanations of specific fallacies such as ad hominem attacks, slippery slope arguments, equivocation, affirming the consequent, and more.
1.1 arguments, premises, and conclusionsSaqlain Akram
Formal Logic : Leacture 01
Chapter 1: Basic Concepts
1.1 Arguments, Premises, and Conclusions
Follow on Facebook:
https://web.facebook.com/learnforgood...
and on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8kUyEAA5ix6Bl5H5gKXo3A
Like, Comment and Share.
Also Subscribe For More Videos.
Learn For Good.
This document provides an overview of rhetorical analysis and its key components. It defines rhetoric as persuasive communication and examines an author's audience, purpose, genre, argument components like claims and evidence, and types of evidence. The document instructs readers to analyze how an argument is made through its rhetorical elements, not just the topic itself.
The document discusses different types of fallacies, or flawed arguments. It begins by defining a fallacy as an argument that uses poor reasoning, whether or not the conclusion is true. Fallacies can be formal, stemming from logical flaws, or informal. The document then examines different types of formal and informal fallacies identified by Aristotle, Richard Whately, and others. It provides examples of intentional and unintentional fallacies, as well as deductive fallacies. Specific fallacies like appeal to pity, scare tactics, and two wrongs making a right are explored in more depth.
This document provides guidance on writing a formal argumentative essay. It discusses the key components of an argumentative essay including the introduction, body, and conclusion. The body should include multiple arguments supported by evidence. One should anticipate and refute counterarguments. Formal language requires an objective tone without informal language or contractions. Paragraphs need topic sentences, and coherence is created through linking words.
This document discusses the seven types of meaning in semantics according to Geoffrey Leech:
1. Conceptual meaning refers to the literal or dictionary definition of a word.
2. Connotative meaning involves the social and cultural values associated with a word.
3. Social meaning depends on aspects of society and dialect.
4. Affective meaning refers to the emotions and attitudes conveyed.
5. Reflective meaning involves multiple conceptual meanings from a single sense.
6. Collocative meaning consists of associations acquired based on common words in the environment.
7. Thematic meaning is communicated through how the message is organized, ordered and emphasized.
This document provides an introduction to critical thinking and the differences between deductive and inductive reasoning. It defines logic and reasoning, and explains that deductive reasoning moves from general premises to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broader generalizations. Examples of each type of reasoning are provided. The key differences are that deductive reasoning establishes absolute truths if the premises are true, while inductive reasoning reaches tentative conclusions.
This document discusses the three main techniques of persuasion: ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos involves establishing credibility and trustworthiness. Logos uses facts, statistics, and logical reasoning to persuade. Pathos appeals to emotions such as fear, sadness, nostalgia, and humor. Together, these techniques - establishing credibility, using facts and logic, and appealing to emotions - are commonly employed in advertising to influence audiences.
This document provides an overview of I.A. Richards' seminal work "The Meaning of Meaning". It summarizes that Richards, along with Ogden, developed a triadic theory of semiotics that influenced Richards' later literary criticism. The document also defines meaning, discusses the "proper meaning" superstition, and outlines Richards' semantic triangle model and his proposed linguistic remedies for misunderstanding such as definition, metaphor, feedforward, and Basic English.
The document discusses what makes an effective paragraph. It notes that effective paragraphs have unity, coherence, and adequate development. They contain a clear topic sentence that states the main idea. All sentences in the paragraph should be logically connected and relate back to the topic sentence. Transitional words, pronouns, repetition of key terms, and parallel structures are used to ensure coherence between sentences. A paragraph should also have sufficient examples, details, facts, or other information to fully develop the main idea.
1. The document discusses the key concepts of logic including arguments, propositions, premises, conclusions and the validity of arguments.
2. It provides examples to illustrate inductive and deductive arguments, and distinguishes between arguments and explanations.
3. Arguments are considered valid if the truth of the premises necessarily implies the truth of the conclusion, while invalid arguments can have true premises and conclusions but the conclusion does not logically follow.
The document discusses students debating whether to add a 7th grade to the elementary curriculum. Student 1 and 2 argue it is a waste of money, while Student 4 says it would improve the curriculum like in Japan and Korea. Student 5 disagrees, stating those countries emphasize science, technology and math instead. Student 5 and 6 agree that improving technology and facilities in schools would better prepare students. The document also lists expressions used to directly agree, disagree, or disagree in a more softened way in a discussion.
This document discusses different types of meaning in language. It outlines seven types of conceptual meaning: 1) conceptual or denotative meaning, 2) connotative meaning, 3) social meaning, 4) affective or emotive meaning, 5) reflected meaning, 6) collocative meaning, and 7) thematic meaning. It also discusses literal and figurative meaning, and explains how sentence meaning differs from speaker meaning. Finally, it describes Ogden and Richards' theory of symbols and meaning, including their semantic triangle model of the relationships between symbols, thoughts, and referents.
An argument is a logical structure with premises that lead to a conclusion. Arguments can be evaluated based on validity, truth, and soundness. Validity means the conclusion follows logically from the premises. An argument is sound if it is valid and all premises are true. Inductive and deductive reasoning differ in strengths and weaknesses. Inductive relies on experience while deductive accepts fixed definitions, but may lead to apparently necessary but false conclusions. Fallacies and counterarguments should be considered when critically evaluating arguments.
This document discusses intertextuality and how it functions as a literary technique in drama. It defines intertextuality as the connections between related works of literature that influence interpretation. Various intertextual figures are described, including allusion, quotation, calque, translation, parody, pastiche, appropriation, and adaptation. Steps for identifying and analyzing intertextuality in a text are provided. Archetypes are also discussed as inherently intertextual, with examples like Superman and Hercules both possessing superhuman strength.
This document provides definitions and guidelines for proper use of mechanics in composition, including capitalization, punctuation, pronouns, and abbreviations. It defines mechanics as the technical conventions of writing, such as spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Specific rules and examples are given for capitalizing proper nouns and abbreviations. Guidelines are also given for using punctuation like apostrophes, commas, and periods correctly. The document advises avoiding unclear pronouns and recommends style guidelines for contractions.
This document provides guidance on using quotations in writing. It discusses direct quotes, which use the exact words from a source and are enclosed in quotation marks. It also covers indirect quotes, which paraphrase a source, and partial quotes. The document explains how to introduce and integrate quotes into sentences and discusses punctuation rules for quotes. It provides examples of direct, indirect, and partial quotes and how to format longer block quotes.
The document provides instructions for writing a definition in 3 parts: [1] The term being defined, [2] The group or concept the term belongs to, and [3] The distinguishing characteristics of the term. An example definition is given for the term "water" as a liquid made up of hydrogen and oxygen molecules. Readers are encouraged to follow this three-step process to write their own definitions.
This document discusses the structure and elements of categorical propositions in Aristotelian logic. It explains that categorical propositions are constructed using a subject category and predicate category, and the copula indicates the relationship between the two categories. However, propositions can be ambiguous without specifying the quantity, or how much of the subject is included in the predicate. The document presents the four categorical forms - A, E, I, and O propositions - which specify universal or particular quantity and affirmative or negative quality to remove ambiguity. It provides examples and exercises to illustrate the application of these forms.
This document discusses definitions and their rules. It begins by explaining that a definition is a statement that answers the question "what is this thing?" and comes from the Latin word "definire" meaning "to lay down." There are different types of definitions including biverbal, stipulative, lexical, and ostensive/extensive. The document outlines four main rules of definitions: 1) a definition must be clearer than the term defined, 2) it cannot contain the term being defined, 3) it must be convertible with the term, and 4) it should be positive rather than negative whenever possible.
This document provides a mini guide to critical thinking. It introduces key concepts like meaning, definitions, necessary and sufficient conditions, and linguistic pitfalls like ambiguity and vagueness. The guide is divided into sections covering these concepts and how they relate to critical thinking. It aims to highlight important principles in a brief yet accessible way.
This document discusses definitions and types of meaning. It outlines five types of definitions: lexical, stipulative, precising, persuasive, and theoretical. It also discusses the purposes of definitions as showing relationships, removing ambiguity, reducing vagueness, increasing vocabulary, explaining concepts theoretically, and influencing attitudes. Techniques for defining terms include defining by example, ostensive definitions, quasi-ostensive definitions, definitions by genus and difference, and synonymous definitions. The document also outlines seven kinds of meaning: conceptual, connotative, social, affective, reflected, thematic, and collocative meaning.
Logic is the study of correct reasoning and principles of arguments. It is both a science and an art. Studying logic helps improve critical thinking and problem solving. Language is important for communication and uses logic for reasoning and analyzing arguments. Terms are words that convey ideas and are basic components of statements. Definitions explain the meaning of terms. Judgments are mental statements that can be true or false, while propositions verbally express judgments and sentences are groups of words that express a thought.
This document defines definition and its types. It begins by stating the objectives will be to grasp the concept of definition, understand the terms 'definiendum' and 'definiens', learn the different types of definition, and distinguish between them. It then defines definition, definiendum, and definiens. It introduces the main types of definition - stipulative, lexical, precising, theoretical, and persuasive definition - and provides examples of each. The document concludes by assigning definition-related activities and homework to help understand the different types.
This document discusses different types of definitions and how to write them effectively. It begins by explaining that precise definitions of key terms are important for clear communication. It then describes essential definitions, which name the item, place it in a broad category, and distinguish it from others in that category. The document notes some pitfalls to avoid in essential definitions and explains that extended definitions using various writing techniques are sometimes needed to fully explain abstract concepts. It concludes by mentioning that negation can also be used in extended definitions.
This document discusses various aspects of defining terms and concepts in language. It outlines two main linguistic functions: conveying cognitive meaning or information, and conveying emotive meaning or feelings. It also discusses different types of definitions, including stipulative, lexical, theoretical, and persuasive definitions. The document provides examples and guidelines for properly constructing definitions, such as avoiding circularity, being affirmative where possible, and indicating proper context.
This document discusses deixis and definiteness in language. It defines deictic words as words that take on meaning based on the context of the utterance, such as pronouns. Definiteness refers to whether a noun phrase assumes the listener can identify its referent based on the context. The use of definite and indefinite articles and expressions helps establish and refer to entities in the conversation context. Deixis allows language to be portable across situations by anchoring word meanings to utterance context.
The Art of Defining Concept Paper.pptxJoeCresBarog
The document defines and discusses different techniques for defining terms, concepts, and ideas. It begins by formally defining definition as a mode of paragraph development that answers what something is, what it means, and its key features. The document then discusses different types of definitions, including formal definition using genus and differentia, and extended definition using analogy, metaphor, comparison/contrast, description, analysis, function, etymology, semantic origin, examples, synonyms, and negation. It emphasizes that definition is important for clarifying meaning and avoiding misinterpretation.
This document discusses the concepts of phrase and sentence meaning, extension and intension, and sense and reference.
It explains that the meaning of phrases and sentences depends on both the meaning of the individual words as well as how those words are structurally combined. It also describes intension as the internal content or formal definition of a term, while extension refers to the range of objects to which a term applies. Finally, it distinguishes sense, which deals with relationships within language, from reference, which involves the relationship between language and real-world objects. Sense is the place of an expression within a system of semantic relationships, while reference can be either variable, applying to different types of objects, or constant, referring to the same
Definition purposes to know the real meaning of definitionmikyladupa
The document discusses different methods of defining terms in technical writing, including:
- Definition provides meaning and limits an abstract term or concept.
- Importance of definition includes clarifying concepts, lessening technological gaps, and making technical writing understandable.
- Placement of definitions depends on factors like audience, length, purpose, and disciplinary conventions; common placements are within text, margins, footnotes, glossaries, and appendices.
Definition is a way of giving or explaining the meaning of an abstract term or a concept. It is derived from the Latin word finire (to limit); and de(from), the explanation it gives is limited only to what the reader need to know about the term to avoid confusion with other word belonging to the same class to where the target word belongs.
This document defines different types of definitions and discusses their purposes. There are two main parts to every definition: the definiendum (the term being defined) and the definiens (the definition itself). The document then describes several kinds of definitions: stipulative definitions introduce new meanings; lexical definitions report existing meanings; precisive definitions reduce vagueness; persuasive definitions aim to influence attitudes; and theoretical definitions provide scientifically useful characterizations. The document also distinguishes between genuine disputes involving factual disagreements, merely verbal disputes stemming from semantic ambiguities, and apparently verbal disputes that still involve underlying attitudinal disagreements once clarified.
Definition is an explanation of the meaning of a word or phrase. There are three main parts to a definition: the term, which is what is being defined; the class or group which the term belongs to; and the function or characteristic that makes the term unique. There are three types of definitions: formal definitions explain the essential features or nature of the term; nominal definitions simply explain the meaning; and informal definitions use familiar words to briefly explain the term. Definitions are important for communication and avoiding ambiguity, especially in technical fields.
This document discusses various concepts related to communication, language, and meaning. It defines semantics as the study of meaning and distinguishes between three subfields: lexical semantics, grammatical semantics, and logical semantics. It also discusses different units of analysis including words, utterances, sentences, and propositions. Finally, it outlines different dimensions of meaning such as reference versus sense, denotation versus reference, descriptive versus non-descriptive meaning, and literal versus non-literal meaning. Contextual meaning is also discussed as important for disambiguation.
A critical study of the word meanings in dictionariesAlexander Decker
This summary provides the key details from the document in 3 sentences:
The document discusses a study that critically examines how the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary, 7th edition defines word meanings. It looks at both the strengths and weaknesses of how this dictionary provides definitions. Some strengths identified include clearly explaining words with multiple meanings, using examples, pictures, and defining words by their grammatical categories. However, it also notes there may be some weaknesses in how certain words are defined.
A critical study of the word meanings in dictionariesAlexander Decker
This document provides a critical analysis of word meanings in the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (7th edition). It discusses both the strengths and weaknesses found in the dictionary's definitions. The strengths include clearly explaining words with multiple concepts, using examples for context, including pictures, and defining words by grammatical category. However, weaknesses include some circular definitions, difficult words in definitions, and definitions that seem to be based on environments from developed countries. The document concludes that while weaknesses exist, the dictionary overall has more strengths due to factors like defining all words used in definitions.
This document provides guidance on defining terms, including four questions to consider when writing a definition, and three techniques for defining terms: definition by synonym, definition by category, and definition by negation. It also discusses using dictionary definitions while avoiding getting lost in further definitions, and includes the etymology or word origin of some terms as examples.
This document discusses formal and informal definitions. A formal definition consists of three parts: the term being defined, the class or category it belongs to, and distinguishing characteristics. An informal definition explains an unknown term using known words, examples, synonyms, or analogies. The document provides examples of formal and informal definitions and discusses when each type is appropriate. It concludes by having the reader practice forming formal and informal definitions from a passage.
This document provides an introduction to basic concepts about sentences, including the different types of sentences based on function and structure. It discusses simple, compound, and complex sentences. It also covers topics like sentence components, question formation, negation, tenses, parts of speech, affixes, and the concepts of coherence and cohesion in writing. The document is intended as an introductory overview of foundational grammar topics for a course.
This document discusses semantics and lexical relations between words. It defines semantics as the study of meaningful units and their cognitive meanings. There are several lexical relations between words based on their senses, including synonymy, homonymy, polysemy, antonymy, and hyponymy. Synonymy refers to words that have the same meaning. Homonymy and polysemy involve ambiguity, where homonymy refers to words that are identical but have different unrelated meanings, while polysemy refers to a word whose meaning is extended metaphorically. Antonymy describes opposites, including complementary, gradable, and relational opposites. Hyponymy describes a subordinate, more specific relationship between a general lexeme and
Traditional Grammar was in the 19th century that historical language study began to meet the criteria of scientificness and only in the 20th century that the study of contemporary languages became scientific in today’s sense of the word.
Evaluating a dictionary: is the process of judging or calculating the quality, importance, amount, or value of dictionary : Evaluation of this new treatment cannot take place until all the data has been collected.
Lexicographers don’t decide which words are proper, they struggle with words like love.
They certainly have a favorite word.
Internet makes lexicographers life easier.
It took almost fifty years to create the first Oxford English dictionary.
Sample sentences from dictionaries can make interesting short stories.
The longest word in the dictionary is the name of a lung disease “pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanokoniosis”
A murder was a contributor to the first oxford English dictionary “ William Chester Minor”
The dictionary included a fake word for five years “dord”
The use of language is is the inherent capability of native speakers to understand and form grammatical sentences. A language is a set of (finite or infinite) sentences, each finite length constructed out of a limited set of elements.
A sentence is a set of words that complete in itself , and generally contains a subject and a main verb.
A clause is a group of words that contains a subject and verb.
Independent clause can stand alone as a sentence.
Dependent clause cannot stand alone as a sentence.
This document provides an overview of the major and minor branches of linguistics. The major branches discussed are phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics. Phonology is the study of sound structure in language. Morphology studies word formation. Syntax deals with the arrangement of words. Semantics is the study of meaning. The minor branches covered are phonetics, sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and pragmatics. Phonetics focuses on speech sounds. Sociolinguistics examines the relationship between language and society. Psycholinguistics studies language processing in the brain. Pragmatics relates to practical language use. Examples are provided for some branches.
A dictionary is a resource for word information. The book is about language. The encyclopedia is its closest relative, but this book is about things, people, places, and ideas; it is not a book on language. It might be challenging to distinguish between a dictionary and an encyclopedia because the two frequently share features. However, they do not have the same headword list—something you would be hard-pressed to find in an encyclopedia—and they do not share the same definitions for the headwords they do share.
How can varieties in English differ from one another?
1) Phonological variation.2)Lexical variation.3)Morphological variation.4)Syntactic variation.5)Pragmatic variation.
This document discusses key concepts in morphology including:
1. Morphemes are the smallest units of meaning in a language. There are two types: free morphemes which can stand alone as words, and bound morphemes which cannot stand alone and include prefixes and suffixes.
2. Morphs are the actual forms used to realize morphemes. Allomorphs are variant forms of the same morpheme.
3. Phonemes are the smallest units of sound that make a difference in meaning. Allophones are variants of the same phoneme.
Phonetics: is the branch of linguistics that deals with how to human speech sounds are made . علم الصوتيات أحد الفروع الأساسية في اللغة الإنجليزية لمعرفة طرق خروج الأصوات من شخص لآخر.It describes how physical expressions of human speech sounds are produced.
علم الصوتيات يشرح طريقة إنتاج التعبيرات الجسدية لأصوات البشر”.Phonetic units are called phones.“يطلق على الصوتيات اسم الهواتف”As we know that phonetic symbols are enclosed in square brackets.“تكون الرموز الصوتية بداخل أقواس مربعة”.
This document defines and provides examples of different processes of word-formation, including:
- Borrowing words from other languages
- Compounding by joining words together
- Derivation by adding affixes to existing words
- Clipping by cutting parts of words
- Invention of new words
- Acronymy forming words from initials
- Backformation reducing words to new forms
- Reduplication repeating parts of words
- Echoism relating sound and meaning
- Antonomasia forming words from names
It discusses these processes with definitions and examples from sources on linguistics.
The document discusses different tools that can be used to facilitate foreign language learning, including visual aids, audio resources, audiovisual materials, and digital technologies. It outlines several basic principles for using these tools, such as making them instructional, experiential, elicitative, and exploratory. There are four main categories of resources: visuals and visualization techniques, audiovisual means and video production, audio resources and audio production, and information and communication technologies. The document then provides detailed explanations of activities and processes for using each type of resource receptively, actively, and for follow-up work. It also discusses using video feedback and roleplays to improve language skills.
Reliability refers to the consistency of test scores across different administrations of the test. There are two aspects of reliability - reliability of scores over time and reliability of scoring. Reliability of scoring is easier to achieve for objectively scored tests but is important for subjectively scored tests like essays. There are two types of scorer reliability: intra-rater reliability which measures consistency of a single rater's scores and inter-rater reliability which measures consistency between multiple raters' scores. Reliability can be quantified using reliability coefficients which measure the correlation between scores from different test administrations or halves of a test. A test cannot be valid unless it is also reliable, but a reliable test may not be valid as there
The use of correction codes by the teacher instead of giving full correction is a widespread practice, the rationale behind it is that it encourages students to think about their writing and correct themselves.
The teacher also can ask students to exchange their pieces of written work and discuss them in groups so that they can correct each other’s errors.
This document discusses evaluation in education, covering definitions of evaluation and assessment, forms of assessments (formative and summative), measurements, tests, criteria for good tests including validity and reliability, test types such as aptitude tests and placement tests, and the relationship between teaching and testing. It provides an overview of key concepts and topics related to evaluation in 14 sections.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms for those who already suffer from conditions like depression and anxiety.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
Pollock and Snow "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape, Session One: Setting Expec...
Definition
1. Definition
SUPERVISED BY: Dr. Khaleel B. Al Bataineh
DONE BY : Muhammed Zaid Salahalden
Doha Wajeeh Jasim
Haneen Ali
Amman Arab University
Dept. of English Language and Translation
2. A definition is a statement of the
meaning of a term (a word, phrase,
or other set of symbols).
The definition is a characterisation
of the
meaning of the (sense of the) lexeme;
it is not an exhaustive explanation of
the possihle
Referents.
The term “drfinition” came from the
latin word “Definire” meaning to lay
down
Thus , etymologically, to define
means to lay down the markers or
limit .
A definition
4. Classes of intensional definitions
Classes of intensional definitions
A genus–differentia definition is a type
of intensional definition that takes a
large category (the genus) and narrows
it down to a smaller category by a
distinguishing characteristic .
More formally, a genus–differentia
definition consists of:
5. Classes of extensional definitions
ostensive definition enumerative definition
This gives the
meaning of a
term by
pointing, in the
case of an
individual, to
the thing itself.
This gives an
explicit and
exhaustive
listing of all
the objects that
fall under the
concept or term
in question.
6. Nominal definitions Real definitions
A nominal definition is
the definition explaining
what a word means (i.e.,
which says what the
"nominal essence" is),
and is definition in the
classical sense as given
above.
A real definition, by
contrast, is one
expressing the real
nature or quid rei of
the thing.
7. A definition should be substitutable for the item being
defined; so the head of the definition phrase should belong
to the same word class as the delined lexenme ,different
forms of definition are appropriate to different types of
word.
8. Kindsof DefinitionBasedonUsage
A. Lexical Definition
A lexical definition (Latin, lexis which means “word”) is the definition of
a word according to the meaning customarily assigned to it by the
community of users.
E.g.: Lexicon - dictionary: a reference book that alphabetically lists
words and their meanings, e.g. of an ancient language
River - large natural channel of water: a natural
B. Stipulative Definition
A stipulative definition is a kind of definition in which a new word or
term is coined in order to signify a meaning or object for which no
word in the language has previously been given.
For example, the word selfie has been invented in order to signify a
person who loves to take picture of himself or herself.
Precising
9. C. Précising Definition
The purpose of a précising definition is to reduce the vagueness of a
word.There are terms in our language which must have precise
definitions because some future actions are based on our knowledge of
them.
D.Theoretical Definition
Theoretical definitions attempt to define an object according to its
true nature, and not necessarily according to the way the word is
used by a community of users.
However, this definition is the best one, for it reveals the real
nature of salt. Other familiar theoretical definitions are “force
equals mass times acceleration,” or “light is electromagnetic
energy (of a certain range of wavelengths).
10. E. Persuasive Definition
Some definitions are intended either mainly or at least
partly to influence attitudes
Here are examples of persuasive definitions:
Democracy is a government of the weak, inferior race.
Democracy is a government of the people by the
people for the people.
Persuasive is not really concerned with revealing the
true nature of the concept defined but of influencing
attitude by using phrases that appeal to one’s
emotion.
11. Rulesof Definition:
1. A definition should state the essential attributes of the object being defined.
Essential attributes are attributes which make the object what it is. So, a good definition
of “X” must be able to answer the question “What really is X?”
The definition of man as a rational animal satisfies this criterion, for it tells us what man
really is. However, defining man as an animal who is capable of speech violates this rule
because being able to speak is not what makes man as “man”.
12. 2. A definition should be neither too broad nor too
narrow.
When a definition is too broad, it might include objects
which are not proper extensions of the term, and when
it is too narrow, it might exclude objects which are
really extensions of the term.
For instance, if we define man as a bipedal mammal
then we have to include, based on that definition, other
mammals which are also bipedal like apes. Or, if we
define man as a rational animal with two legs, two
hands, and one head, then our definition is too narrow
since it would exclude people who do not have complete
legs or hands.
3. A definition must not be circular.
This means that the definiendum must not
appear in the definiens. A definition violates this
rule when the term that is supposed to be
defined is used to define itself.
Examples of definition that violates this rule:
“Sympathy” is the feeling of a person
who feels sympathetic.
“Fallacy” is an argument that is fallacious.
A “circle” is a plane figure that has a circular
shape.
13. 4. A definition should not be expressed in figurative, obscure and ambiguous language.
Good definitions do not use metaphor or figurative languages. The purpose of definition is to give us
clear idea of what a thing is, and using figurative language will not allow us to achieve that. No
matter how appealing such a definition, still it gives no clear idea of what it tries to define. It also
defeats the purpose of definition if we define words using other words that are more unfamiliar and
obscure.
Examples of definition that violates this rule:
An elephant is an animal with a long prosboscis.
A lover is someone who gives you sunshine.
God is the alpha and the omega.
14. 5. A definition should as much as possible be affirmative, rather than negative.
The purpose of definition is primarily to tell us what a thing is, not what a thing
is not.
Example of definition that violate this rule:
A plant is a living thing that is not an animal.
But there are terms which are essentially negative, and a defining such terms
requires negative definition. Hence, such negative definitions do not violate
this rule. Here are the example:
A bald person is someone who has no hair in the head.
15. What are the threepartsof a definition
statement?
1. Term being defined
2. Classification
3. Identifying characteristics
16. 1- TermBeingDefined
The term being defined is the part of a definition statement that serves as a label for
the classification and identifying characteristic(s).
In the sociology definitions given, the term being defined is given in bold faced print.
It is easier to use the term being defined in a statement instead of using the
definition of each individual word. For example, it is quicker and easier to say, “Tour
packages receive discount prices by hotels and restaurants because breakage.”
If you had to use in place of breakage “the financial gain to a hotel when meals or
other services included in a package are not used by the guests,” it would greatly
increase the amount of words needed to communicate. Communication would be
very difficult or impossible if each term used in a statement had to be defined.
17. 2- Classification
The classification is the part of a definition statement that tells under
what category or group a term is located.
In the sociology definitions given, the classification of each term is
underlined.
The classification in a definition statement tells what common feature
the term being defined shares with other terms. Here you can see each
sociology term has the common feature of being a “small group of
people.” Therefore, a "small group of people" is the classification of
each of these sociology terms.
18. 3- IdentifyingCharacteristic(s)
The identifying characteristic of each of the sociology terms being defined
is italicized. Notice that each of the sociology terms has a different
identifying characteristic.
A term's identifying characteristic(s) tell you how that term being defined is
unique or different from other terms that share the same classification.
It is the identifying characteristic(s) of a definition statement giving the
term's unique identifying characteristic(s) that permit you to identify
something as an example of the term being defined. This will be explained
later.
19. Definitionin medicine
In medical dictionaries, guidelines and other consensus
statements and classifications, definitions should as far as
possible be:
•simple and easy to understand, preferably even by the
general public.
•useful clinically or in related areas where the definition will
be used.
•specific (that is, by reading the definition only, it should
ideally not be possible to refer to any other entity than that
being defined);
•measurable.
•a reflection of current scientific knowledge.
20. What are the Identifying Typesof
Definitions
1- Identify formal definitions.
2- Identify informal definitions.
3-Identify extended definitions.
21. 1- Formaldefinition:
A formal definition consists of three parts: the term, the part of
speech to which it belongs, such as a noun or a verb, and all
the traits or characteristics that are specific to that term.
The dictionary is filled with formal definitions, but it is not the only
place where you will find them. Writers often include formal
definitions when they are writing about something that may be
unfamiliar to their readers. In textbooks, you may find the formal
definition of terms listed at the beginning, at the end of a chapter,
or in the glossary, which is a mini-dictionary of terms relevant to
that text.
In an informal definition, the writer uses known words or
examples to explain an unknown term.These definitions
may be synonyms or antonyms introduced
by or, in other words, or like.
2- Informaldefinition:
22. Extended definitions generally have components of both
informal and formal definitions. However, as the name
suggests, the author uses a number of other techniques to
define a word, concept, or phrase, including the following:
•Listing and describing the parts: identifying smaller, more
familiar pieces of an idea to point to the definition of the
bigger concept.
•Etymology: sharing a word's origin.
3- Extendeddefinitions
23. What is the difference between “define” and “what is”
“To define” usually means to cite, or to make a formal
“definition
“What is” on the other hand is not formal, so the answer can
range from “define” to “explain your grandmother”; it depends
on context.
24. Why good definitions are valuable assets?
They allow us to assess situations better, have more
meaningful conversations, and make better decisions.
In contrast, imprecise definitions make it difficult to even
agree on what we’re talking about.The conversations end
up circling around, going nowhere.
25. A really good definition is generative. It creates value
beyond its intended purpose of describing something
effectively. Our definition of social media very
naturally led us to realize why people are so
annoying on social media. It also helped us see
how social media disrupted traditional media. We
didn’t set out to answer those questions- the
definition led us there.
26. Fora definition to be useful,it has to be:
1. Precise. Not vague, and not convoluted. It should have as
few elements (“moving parts”) as possible.
2. Falsifiable.This is typically a function of precision.The
more precise you are about something, the easier it is for
others to point out when you’re wrong.This is a good thing,
because it then allows you to revise your definition. This
allows for healthy, constructive discussions that are focused
on outcomes rather than personal egos.