29-0 
Chapter Twenty Nine 
Credit Management 
Corporate Finance 
Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Sixth Edition 29 
Prepared by 
Gady Jacoby 
University of Manitoba 
and 
Sebouh Aintablian 
American University of 
Beirut 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-1 
Executive Summary 
• When a firm sells goods and services: 
(1) it can be paid in cash immediately or 
(2) it can wait for a time to be paid by extending 
credit to its customers. 
• Granting credit is investing in a customer, an 
investment tied to the sale of a product or service. 
• This chapter examines the firm’s decision to grant 
credit. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-2 
Chapter Outline 
29.1 Terms of the Sale 
29.2 The Decision to Grant Credit: 
Risk and Information 
29.3 Optimal Credit Policy 
29.4 Credit Analysis 
29.5 Collection Policy 
29.6 Other Aspects of Credit Policy 
29.7 Summary & Conclusions 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-3 
Introduction 
• A firm’s credit policy is composed of: 
– Terms of the sale 
– Credit analysis 
– Collection policy 
• This chapter discusses each of the components of 
credit policy that makes up the decision to grant 
credit. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-4 
The Cash Flows of Granting Credit 
Credit sale 
is made 
Customer 
mails 
cheque 
Firm 
deposits 
cheque 
Bank credits 
firm’s 
account 
Cash collection 
Accounts receivable 
Time 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-5 
29.1 Terms of the Sale 
• The terms of sale of composed of 
– Credit Period 
– Cash Discounts 
– Credit Instruments 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-6 
Credit Period 
• Credit periods vary across industries. 
• Generally a firm must consider three factors in 
setting a credit period: 
– The probability that the customer will not pay. 
– The size of the account. 
– The extent to which goods are perishable. 
• Lengthening the credit period generally increases 
sales 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-7 
Cash Discounts 
• Often part of the terms of sale. 
• Tradeoff between the size of the discount and the 
increased speed and rate of collection of 
receivables. 
• An example would be “3/10 net 30” 
– The customer can take a 3% discount if he pays within 10 
days. 
– In any event, he must pay within 30 days. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-8 
The Interest Rate Implicit in 3/10 net 30 
A firm offering credit terms of 3/10 net 30 is essentially 
offering their customers a 20-day loan. 
To see this, consider a firm that makes a $1,000 sale on day 0 
Some customers will pay on day 10 and take the discount. 
$970 
0 10 30 
Other customers will pay on day 30 and forgo the discount. 
$1,000 
0 10 30 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-9 
The Interest Rate Implicit in 3/10 net 30 
A customer that forgoes the 3% discount to pay on day 30 is 
borrowing $970 for 20 days and paying $30 interest: 
+$970 -$1,000 
0 10 30 
$1,000 
20 365 (1 ) 
$970 
 r 
 
$1,000 
$970 
(1 ) 20 365  r  
 
    
1 0.7435 74.35% 
365 
$1,000 20 
$970 
 
 
r  
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-10 
Credit Instruments 
• Most credit is offered on open account—the invoice is the 
only credit instrument. 
• Promissory notes are IOUs that are signed after the delivery 
of goods 
• Commercial drafts call for a customer to pay a specific 
amount by a specific date. The draft is sent to the customer’s 
bank, when the customer signs the draft, the goods are sent. 
• Banker’s acceptances allow a bank to substitute its 
creditworthiness for the customer, for a fee. 
• Conditional sales contracts let the seller retain legal 
ownership of the goods until the customer has completed 
payment. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-11 
29.2 The Decision to Grant Credit: Risk 
and Information 
• Consider a firm that is choosing between two 
alternative credit policies: 
– “In God we trust—everybody else pays cash.” 
– Offering their customers credit. 
( ) 0 0 0 • The only cash flow of the first strategy isQ  P C 
• The expected cash flows of the credit strategy are: 
' 
0hQ P 
' 
0 
' 
0C Q 
' 
0 
0 1 
We incur costs up 
front… 
…and get paid in 1 period 
by h% of our customers. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-12 
29.2 The Decision to Grant Credit: Risk 
and Information 
•The NPV of the cash only strategy is 
( ) 0 0 0 NPV Q P C cash    
' 
0 
' 
•The NPV of the credit strategy is 
h  
Q P 
' 0 
0 
NPV C Q 
   
credit r 
(1 ) 
' 
0 
B 
 
The decision to grant credit depends on four factors: 
1. The delayed revenues from granting credit, 
2. The immediate costs of granting credit, 
3. The probability of repayment, h 
4. The discount rate, rB 
' 
0PQ 
' 
0 
' 
0 
' 
0C Q 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-13 
Example of the Decision to Grant Credit 
• A firm currently sells 1,000 items per month on a 
cash basis for $500 each. 
• If they offered terms net 30, the marketing 
department believes that they could sell 1,300 items 
per month. 
• The collections department estimates that 5% of 
credit customers will default. 
• The cost of capital is 10% per annum. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-14 
Example of the Decision to Grant Credit 
No Credit Net 45 
Quantity sold 1,000 1,300 
Selling price $500 $500 
Unit cost $400 $425 
Probability of payment 100% 95% 
Credit period (days) 0 30 
Discount rate p.a. 10% 
The NPV of cash only: 1,000($500$400)  $100,000 
The NPV of Net 30: 
$60,181.58 
1,300  $500  
0.95 
    
1,300 $425 30/365  
(1.10) 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-15 
Example of the Decision to Grant Credit 
• How high must the credit price be to make it 
worthwhile for the firm to extend credit? 
The NPV of Net 30 must be at least as big as 
the NPV of cash only: 
' 
0 
P 
1,300   
0.95 
30/365 
(1.10) 
$100,000 1,300 $425 
    
($100,000  1,300  $425)  (1.10) 30/365  1,300 P ' 
 
0.95 0 
$532.50 
($100,000  1,300  $425)  
(1.10) 30/365 
' 
0  
1,300  
0.95 
P  
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-16 
The Value of New Information about 
Credit Risk 
• The most that we should be willing to pay for new 
information about credit risk is the present value of 
the expected cost of defaults: 
NPV C Q h 
    (1  ) 
 
C Q h 
     
(1 ) 
$0 
r 
(1 ) 
' 
0 
' 
0 
' 
0 
' 
0 
B 
default 
 
In our earlier example, with a credit price of $500, we would 
be willing to pay $26,000 for a perfect credit screen. 
' 
0 C Q   h      
(1 ) $400 1,300 (1 0.95) $26,000 ' 
0 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-17 
Future Sales and the Credit Decision 
Customer pays 
Give 
credit 
h = 100% 
Do not 
give credit 
We face a more certain credit 
decision with our paying 
customers: 
Information is 
revealed at the 
end of the first 
period: 
Customer pays 
(Probability = h) 
Customer 
defaults 
(Probability = 1– h) 
Give 
credit 
Our first decision: 
Do not 
give credit 
We refuse further 
sales to deadbeats. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-18 
29.3 Optimal Credit Policy 
Carrying 
Costs 
Total costs 
C* 
Costs in 
dollars 
Opportunity costs 
Level of credit extended 
At the optimal amount of credit, the incremental cash 
flows from increased sales are exactly equal to the 
carrying costs from the increase in accounts receivable. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-19 
29.3 Optimal Credit Policy 
• Trade Credit is more likely to be granted if: 
1. The selling firm has a cost advantage over other lenders. 
2. The selling firm can engage in price discrimination. 
3. The selling firm can obtain favourable tax treatment. 
4. The selling firm has no established reputation for 
quality products or services. 
5. The selling firm perceives a long-term strategic 
relationship. 
• The optimal credit policy depends on the 
characteristics of particular firms. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-20 
Organizing the Credit Function 
• Firms that run strictly internal credit operations are self-insured 
against default risk. 
• An alternative is to buy credit insurance through an 
insurance company. 
• In Canada, exporters may qualify for credit insurance 
through the Export Development Corporation (EDC). 
• Large corporations commonly extend credit through a 
wholly owned subsidiary called a captive finance company. 
• Securitization occurs when the selling firm sells its accounts 
receivable to a financial institution. 
• During 1991--92 recession, some Canadian companies 
tightened their credit-granting rules to offset the higher 
probability of customer bankruptcy. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-21 
29.4 Credit Analysis 
• Credit Information 
– Financial Statements 
– Credit Reports on Customer’s Payment History with Other Firms 
– Banks 
– Customer’s Payment History with the Firm 
• Credit Scoring: 
– The traditional 5 C’s of credit 
• Character 
• Capacity 
• Capital 
• Collateral 
• Conditions 
– Some firms employ sophisticated statistical models 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-22 
Credit Scoring 
• Credit scoring refers to the process of: 
(1) calculating a numerical rating for a customer based on 
information collected, 
(2) granting or refusing credit based on the result. 
• Financial Institutions have developed elaborate statistical 
models for credit scoring. This approach has the advantage 
of being objective as compared to scoring based on 
judgments on the 5 C’s. 
• Credit scoring is used for business customers by Canadian 
chartered banks. Scoring for small business loans is a 
particularly attractive application because the technique 
offers the advantages of objective analysis. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-23 
29.5 Collection Policy 
• Collection refers to obtaining payment on past-due 
accounts. 
• Collection Policy is composed of 
– The firm’s willingness to extend credit as reflected in the 
firm’s investment in receivables. 
– Collection Effort 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-24 
Average Collection Period 
• Measures the average amount of time required to 
collect an account receivable. 
Accounts receivable 
Average daily sales 
Average collection period  
• For example, a firm with average daily sales of 
$20,000 and an investment in accounts receivable 
of $150,000 has an average collection period of 
7.5 days 
$150,000 
$20,000 day 
 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-25 
Accounts Receivable Aging Schedule 
• Shows receivables by age of account. 
• The aging schedule is often augmented by the 
payments pattern. 
• The payments pattern describes the lagged 
collection pattern of receivables. 
• The longer an account has been unpaid, the less 
likely it is to be paid. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-26 
Collection Effort 
• Most firms follow a protocol for customers that are 
past due: 
1. Send a delinquency letter. 
2. Make a telephone call to the customer. 
3. Employ a collection agency. 
4. Take legal action against the customer. 
• There is a potential for a conflict of interest 
between the collections department and the sales 
department. 
• You need to strike a balance between antagonizing 
a customer and being taken advantage of by a 
deadbeat. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-27 
29.6 Other Aspects of Credit Policy/Factoring 
• The sale of a firm’s accounts receivable to a 
financial institution (known as a factor). 
• The firm and the factor agree on the basic credit 
terms for each customer. 
The factor pays an agreed-upon 
percentage of the 
accounts receivable to the 
firm. The factor bears the 
risk of nonpaying 
customers 
Firm 
Factor 
Customers send 
payment to the 
factor 
Customer 
Goods 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-28 
Factoring 
• Factoring in Canada is conducted by independent 
firms where main customers are small businesses. 
• What factoring does is remove receivables from 
the balance sheet and so, indirectly, it reduces the 
need for financing. 
• Firms financing their receivables through a 
chartered bank may also use the services of a 
factor to improve the receivables’ collateral value. 
This is called maturity factoring with assignment 
of equity. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-29 
Credit Management in Practice 
• To make monitoring easy, treasury credit staff call 
up customer information from a central database. 
• The system also provides collections staff with a 
daily list of accounts due for a telephone call with a 
complete history of each account. 
• Credit analysis uses an early warning system that 
examines the solvency risk of existing and new 
commercial accounts. The software scores the 
accounts based on financial ratios. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
29-30 
29.7 Summary & Conclusions 
1. The components of a firm’s credit policy are the terms of 
sale, the credit analysis, and the collection policy. 
2. The decision to grant credit is a straightforward NPV 
problem. 
3. Additional information about the probability of customer 
default has value, but must be weighed against the cost of 
the information. 
4. The optimal amount of credit is a function of the conditions 
in which a firm finds itself. 
5. The collection policy is the firm’s method for dealing with 
past-due accounts—it is an integral part of the decision to 
extend credit. 
McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited

Credit management

  • 1.
    29-0 Chapter TwentyNine Credit Management Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Sixth Edition 29 Prepared by Gady Jacoby University of Manitoba and Sebouh Aintablian American University of Beirut McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 2.
    29-1 Executive Summary • When a firm sells goods and services: (1) it can be paid in cash immediately or (2) it can wait for a time to be paid by extending credit to its customers. • Granting credit is investing in a customer, an investment tied to the sale of a product or service. • This chapter examines the firm’s decision to grant credit. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 3.
    29-2 Chapter Outline 29.1 Terms of the Sale 29.2 The Decision to Grant Credit: Risk and Information 29.3 Optimal Credit Policy 29.4 Credit Analysis 29.5 Collection Policy 29.6 Other Aspects of Credit Policy 29.7 Summary & Conclusions McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 4.
    29-3 Introduction •A firm’s credit policy is composed of: – Terms of the sale – Credit analysis – Collection policy • This chapter discusses each of the components of credit policy that makes up the decision to grant credit. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 5.
    29-4 The CashFlows of Granting Credit Credit sale is made Customer mails cheque Firm deposits cheque Bank credits firm’s account Cash collection Accounts receivable Time McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 6.
    29-5 29.1 Termsof the Sale • The terms of sale of composed of – Credit Period – Cash Discounts – Credit Instruments McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 7.
    29-6 Credit Period • Credit periods vary across industries. • Generally a firm must consider three factors in setting a credit period: – The probability that the customer will not pay. – The size of the account. – The extent to which goods are perishable. • Lengthening the credit period generally increases sales McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 8.
    29-7 Cash Discounts • Often part of the terms of sale. • Tradeoff between the size of the discount and the increased speed and rate of collection of receivables. • An example would be “3/10 net 30” – The customer can take a 3% discount if he pays within 10 days. – In any event, he must pay within 30 days. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 9.
    29-8 The InterestRate Implicit in 3/10 net 30 A firm offering credit terms of 3/10 net 30 is essentially offering their customers a 20-day loan. To see this, consider a firm that makes a $1,000 sale on day 0 Some customers will pay on day 10 and take the discount. $970 0 10 30 Other customers will pay on day 30 and forgo the discount. $1,000 0 10 30 McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 10.
    29-9 The InterestRate Implicit in 3/10 net 30 A customer that forgoes the 3% discount to pay on day 30 is borrowing $970 for 20 days and paying $30 interest: +$970 -$1,000 0 10 30 $1,000 20 365 (1 ) $970  r  $1,000 $970 (1 ) 20 365  r       1 0.7435 74.35% 365 $1,000 20 $970   r  McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 11.
    29-10 Credit Instruments • Most credit is offered on open account—the invoice is the only credit instrument. • Promissory notes are IOUs that are signed after the delivery of goods • Commercial drafts call for a customer to pay a specific amount by a specific date. The draft is sent to the customer’s bank, when the customer signs the draft, the goods are sent. • Banker’s acceptances allow a bank to substitute its creditworthiness for the customer, for a fee. • Conditional sales contracts let the seller retain legal ownership of the goods until the customer has completed payment. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 12.
    29-11 29.2 TheDecision to Grant Credit: Risk and Information • Consider a firm that is choosing between two alternative credit policies: – “In God we trust—everybody else pays cash.” – Offering their customers credit. ( ) 0 0 0 • The only cash flow of the first strategy isQ  P C • The expected cash flows of the credit strategy are: ' 0hQ P ' 0 ' 0C Q ' 0 0 1 We incur costs up front… …and get paid in 1 period by h% of our customers. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 13.
    29-12 29.2 TheDecision to Grant Credit: Risk and Information •The NPV of the cash only strategy is ( ) 0 0 0 NPV Q P C cash    ' 0 ' •The NPV of the credit strategy is h  Q P ' 0 0 NPV C Q    credit r (1 ) ' 0 B  The decision to grant credit depends on four factors: 1. The delayed revenues from granting credit, 2. The immediate costs of granting credit, 3. The probability of repayment, h 4. The discount rate, rB ' 0PQ ' 0 ' 0 ' 0C Q McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 14.
    29-13 Example ofthe Decision to Grant Credit • A firm currently sells 1,000 items per month on a cash basis for $500 each. • If they offered terms net 30, the marketing department believes that they could sell 1,300 items per month. • The collections department estimates that 5% of credit customers will default. • The cost of capital is 10% per annum. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 15.
    29-14 Example ofthe Decision to Grant Credit No Credit Net 45 Quantity sold 1,000 1,300 Selling price $500 $500 Unit cost $400 $425 Probability of payment 100% 95% Credit period (days) 0 30 Discount rate p.a. 10% The NPV of cash only: 1,000($500$400)  $100,000 The NPV of Net 30: $60,181.58 1,300  $500  0.95     1,300 $425 30/365  (1.10) McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 16.
    29-15 Example ofthe Decision to Grant Credit • How high must the credit price be to make it worthwhile for the firm to extend credit? The NPV of Net 30 must be at least as big as the NPV of cash only: ' 0 P 1,300   0.95 30/365 (1.10) $100,000 1,300 $425     ($100,000  1,300  $425)  (1.10) 30/365  1,300 P '  0.95 0 $532.50 ($100,000  1,300  $425)  (1.10) 30/365 ' 0  1,300  0.95 P  McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 17.
    29-16 The Valueof New Information about Credit Risk • The most that we should be willing to pay for new information about credit risk is the present value of the expected cost of defaults: NPV C Q h     (1  )  C Q h      (1 ) $0 r (1 ) ' 0 ' 0 ' 0 ' 0 B default  In our earlier example, with a credit price of $500, we would be willing to pay $26,000 for a perfect credit screen. ' 0 C Q   h      (1 ) $400 1,300 (1 0.95) $26,000 ' 0 McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 18.
    29-17 Future Salesand the Credit Decision Customer pays Give credit h = 100% Do not give credit We face a more certain credit decision with our paying customers: Information is revealed at the end of the first period: Customer pays (Probability = h) Customer defaults (Probability = 1– h) Give credit Our first decision: Do not give credit We refuse further sales to deadbeats. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 19.
    29-18 29.3 OptimalCredit Policy Carrying Costs Total costs C* Costs in dollars Opportunity costs Level of credit extended At the optimal amount of credit, the incremental cash flows from increased sales are exactly equal to the carrying costs from the increase in accounts receivable. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 20.
    29-19 29.3 OptimalCredit Policy • Trade Credit is more likely to be granted if: 1. The selling firm has a cost advantage over other lenders. 2. The selling firm can engage in price discrimination. 3. The selling firm can obtain favourable tax treatment. 4. The selling firm has no established reputation for quality products or services. 5. The selling firm perceives a long-term strategic relationship. • The optimal credit policy depends on the characteristics of particular firms. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 21.
    29-20 Organizing theCredit Function • Firms that run strictly internal credit operations are self-insured against default risk. • An alternative is to buy credit insurance through an insurance company. • In Canada, exporters may qualify for credit insurance through the Export Development Corporation (EDC). • Large corporations commonly extend credit through a wholly owned subsidiary called a captive finance company. • Securitization occurs when the selling firm sells its accounts receivable to a financial institution. • During 1991--92 recession, some Canadian companies tightened their credit-granting rules to offset the higher probability of customer bankruptcy. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 22.
    29-21 29.4 CreditAnalysis • Credit Information – Financial Statements – Credit Reports on Customer’s Payment History with Other Firms – Banks – Customer’s Payment History with the Firm • Credit Scoring: – The traditional 5 C’s of credit • Character • Capacity • Capital • Collateral • Conditions – Some firms employ sophisticated statistical models McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 23.
    29-22 Credit Scoring • Credit scoring refers to the process of: (1) calculating a numerical rating for a customer based on information collected, (2) granting or refusing credit based on the result. • Financial Institutions have developed elaborate statistical models for credit scoring. This approach has the advantage of being objective as compared to scoring based on judgments on the 5 C’s. • Credit scoring is used for business customers by Canadian chartered banks. Scoring for small business loans is a particularly attractive application because the technique offers the advantages of objective analysis. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 24.
    29-23 29.5 CollectionPolicy • Collection refers to obtaining payment on past-due accounts. • Collection Policy is composed of – The firm’s willingness to extend credit as reflected in the firm’s investment in receivables. – Collection Effort McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 25.
    29-24 Average CollectionPeriod • Measures the average amount of time required to collect an account receivable. Accounts receivable Average daily sales Average collection period  • For example, a firm with average daily sales of $20,000 and an investment in accounts receivable of $150,000 has an average collection period of 7.5 days $150,000 $20,000 day  McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 26.
    29-25 Accounts ReceivableAging Schedule • Shows receivables by age of account. • The aging schedule is often augmented by the payments pattern. • The payments pattern describes the lagged collection pattern of receivables. • The longer an account has been unpaid, the less likely it is to be paid. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 27.
    29-26 Collection Effort • Most firms follow a protocol for customers that are past due: 1. Send a delinquency letter. 2. Make a telephone call to the customer. 3. Employ a collection agency. 4. Take legal action against the customer. • There is a potential for a conflict of interest between the collections department and the sales department. • You need to strike a balance between antagonizing a customer and being taken advantage of by a deadbeat. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 28.
    29-27 29.6 OtherAspects of Credit Policy/Factoring • The sale of a firm’s accounts receivable to a financial institution (known as a factor). • The firm and the factor agree on the basic credit terms for each customer. The factor pays an agreed-upon percentage of the accounts receivable to the firm. The factor bears the risk of nonpaying customers Firm Factor Customers send payment to the factor Customer Goods McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 29.
    29-28 Factoring •Factoring in Canada is conducted by independent firms where main customers are small businesses. • What factoring does is remove receivables from the balance sheet and so, indirectly, it reduces the need for financing. • Firms financing their receivables through a chartered bank may also use the services of a factor to improve the receivables’ collateral value. This is called maturity factoring with assignment of equity. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 30.
    29-29 Credit Managementin Practice • To make monitoring easy, treasury credit staff call up customer information from a central database. • The system also provides collections staff with a daily list of accounts due for a telephone call with a complete history of each account. • Credit analysis uses an early warning system that examines the solvency risk of existing and new commercial accounts. The software scores the accounts based on financial ratios. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited
  • 31.
    29-30 29.7 Summary& Conclusions 1. The components of a firm’s credit policy are the terms of sale, the credit analysis, and the collection policy. 2. The decision to grant credit is a straightforward NPV problem. 3. Additional information about the probability of customer default has value, but must be weighed against the cost of the information. 4. The optimal amount of credit is a function of the conditions in which a firm finds itself. 5. The collection policy is the firm’s method for dealing with past-due accounts—it is an integral part of the decision to extend credit. McGraw-Hill Ryerson © 2003 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited