Teachers and the 
use of digital 
technologies: 
from the 
technological 
deficit to the 
methodological 
deficit 
FERNANDO ALBUQUERQUE COSTA 
Institute of Education 
UNIVERSITY OF LISBON 
TARTU | 2014 
Conference «Theory meets practice: important issues in teaching practice»
OUTLINE 
1. introduction 
2. the Portuguese context 
3. main issues and some assumptions 
4. which new teacher? 
5. an orthogonal analysis 
6. conclusion
INITIAL TEACHER TRAINING COMPUTER ACCESS DIGITAL RESSOURCES 
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CURRICULUM I&D 
… SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INCENTIVES 
fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação
THE PORTUGUESE CONTEXT 
MINERVA PROJECT 
ICT LEARNING 
OUTCOMES PROJECT 
2008 
1985 2010 
From an exploratory work to a... 
National Educational 
Technology Plan
THE PORTUGUESE CONTEXT 
National Educational Technology 
Plan (2008) 
 Almost all classrooms with at 
least one computer with Internet 
connection and video projector 
 An half with interactive boards…
THE PORTUGUESE CONTEXT 
 Around 500.000 Magalhães where 
distributed for free* to all primary 
students…
THE PORTUGUESE CONTEXT 
In Portugal, teacher-training practices for the 
use of ICT have relied, almost exclusively, on 
the traditional models and practices of 
teacher preparation in general (Barroso & 
Canário, 1999)… 
… leading mainly to a type of training that 
focuses on technology and the learning of 
tools, while forgetting or giving less priority to its 
effective integration in the curricular activity.
THE MAIN ISSUES 
 Which digital competences of students? 
 Which implications for the curriculum? 
Which implications for teachers? 
 Which teacher training model?
SOME CRUCIAL ASSUMPTIONS 
ICT as teacher tool >> ICT as student tool 
ICT to do the same >> ICT to do differently 
ICT as reproduction >> ICT as production 
ICT as a learning subject >> ICT as a mindtool 
Superficial learning >> Deep learning 
fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação
ICT POTENTIAL 
FROM THE CURRICULUM POINT OF VIEW 
Very poor, superficial 
and unclear role of 
ICT in the national 
curriculum, 
independently of the 
subject areas. 
fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação 
 ICT could add value… 
 ICT meaning innovation of 
learning processes 
 ICT much more than an 
instrumental support of 
learning subjects 
 ICT as a set of transversal 
competencies 
 ICT as a tool for both 
individual and social 
development of students 
(citizens)… 
EVIDENCES 
(CRUZ, 2010) 
(COSTA, 2010)
THE PROBLEM 
 “lack of confidence…”, 
 “negative emotional connotation on the 
relation to technology”…, 
 “not feeling competent enough to cope 
with the changes ICT compels them to… 
 “the inappropriate or insufficient training” 
 “lack of support…” 
 “organisational constraints at school”, 
 “too little time and too much to do… 
fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação 
(COSTA & PERALTA, 2006) 
EVIDENCES I
THE PROBLEM 
EVIDENCES II 
 Technology is not an integrated resource 
within teaching activities; 
 Teachers use ICT without a full 
understanding of learning principles; 
 They know how to use computers but not in 
the classroom with their pupils; 
 ICT did not significantly change attitudes, 
roles and ways of teaching and learning. 
(PERALTA & COSTA, 2007) 
fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação
THE PROBLEM 
SYNTHESIS 
Teachers are not conveniently prepared to 
realize and use the innovative potential of 
ICT in the curriculum. 
Traditional teacher’s training models aren’t 
adequate… 
(PERALTA, 2002; COSTA, 2005, 2008) 
fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação
WHICH NEW TEACHER?
WHICH NEW TEACHER? 
From this analysis it is possible to infer that the work with ICT for 
pedagogical aims needs to address issues within three main 
dimensions: 
 the first one has to do with teachers’ background 
knowledge and skills, that is, with what they have 
previously learned and how; 
 the second and crucial one refers to individual 
characteristics, both of an affective and cognitive 
nature; 
 the third one has to do with contextual factors, both an 
organisational and even of a macro structural order.
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
ICT function 
Teachers beliefs 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
(Costa, 2012) 
CAPTION
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
ICT function 
Teachers beliefs 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
(Costa, 2012) 
CAPTION
ICT function 
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
(Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
A teacher who centres his activity 
on the pupils, granting them a 
leading role in their learning. 
The teacher as someone who 
knows and uses tools that help 
him to think, along the lines of 
what Jonassen labelled 
“cognitive tools” (2007), but also 
a teacher who systematically 
reflects on what he does and 
how he does it, and based on this 
reflection introduces changes 
whenever necessary, thus 
improving his practice. 
CAPTION
ICT function 
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
(Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
A teacher who also centres the 
activity on the pupils and 
reflects on what he does on a 
regular basis, although he does 
not yet have knowledge about 
the specific tools, or how to use 
them appropriately to 
encourage, develop and 
enhance the pupils’ ability to 
think, create, solve problems, 
express themselves, 
communicate, interact and 
collaborate with others. 
A teacher who centres his activity 
on the pupils, granting them a 
leading role in their learning. 
The teacher as someone who 
knows and uses tools that help 
him to think, along the lines of 
what Jonassen labelled 
“cognitive tools” (2007), but also 
a teacher who systematically 
reflects on what he does and 
how he does it, and based on this 
reflection introduces changes 
whenever necessary, thus 
improving his practice. 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
CAPTION
ICT function 
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
(Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
A teacher who also centres the 
activity on the pupils and 
reflects on what he does on a 
regular basis, although he does 
not yet have knowledge about 
the specific tools, or how to use 
them appropriately to 
encourage, develop and 
enhance the pupils’ ability to 
think, create, solve problems, 
express themselves, 
communicate, interact and 
collaborate with others. 
The teacher understands and 
uses the technology essentially 
to support the process of 
transmitting knowledge to the 
pupils, whereby the computer is 
largely used as a substitute and 
mediator, be it in the 
transmission of knowledge or in 
the way the learning is 
consolidated, through 
exercises, educational games 
or other kinds of strategies, 
essentially reactively 
responding to the stimuli 
presented. 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
A teacher who centres his activity 
on the pupils, granting them a 
leading role in their learning. 
The teacher as someone who 
knows and uses tools that help 
him to think, along the lines of 
what Jonassen labelled 
“cognitive tools” (2007), but also 
a teacher who systematically 
reflects on what he does and 
how he does it, and based on this 
reflection introduces changes 
whenever necessary, thus 
improving his practice. 
CAPTION
ICT function 
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
(Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
A teacher who also centres the 
activity on the pupils and 
reflects on what he does on a 
regular basis, although he does 
not yet have knowledge about 
the specific tools, or how to use 
them appropriately to 
encourage, develop and 
enhance the pupils’ ability to 
think, create, solve problems, 
express themselves, 
communicate, interact and 
collaborate with others. 
The teacher understands and 
uses the technology essentially 
to support the process of 
transmitting knowledge to the 
pupils, whereby the computer is 
largely used as a substitute and 
mediator, be it in the 
transmission of knowledge or in 
the way the learning is 
consolidated, through 
exercises, educational games 
or other kinds of strategies, 
essentially reactively 
responding to the stimuli 
presented. 
A teacher who knows that tools 
are available, that may be used 
to support and expand the 
thinking process, but who ends up 
using them inappropriately, with 
no consistent theoretical basis 
underpinning this goal, as well as 
not doing so in accordance with 
his own traditional method of 
teaching. 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
A teacher who centres his activity 
on the pupils, granting them a 
leading role in their learning. 
The teacher as someone who 
knows and uses tools that help 
him to think, along the lines of 
what Jonassen labelled 
“cognitive tools” (2007), but also 
a teacher who systematically 
reflects on what he does and 
how he does it, and based on this 
reflection introduces changes 
whenever necessary, thus 
improving his practice. 
CAPTION
ICT function 
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
Technological 
& metodological 
deficit 
Metodological 
deficit 
(Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
A teacher who also centres the 
activity on the pupils and 
reflects on what he does on a 
regular basis, although he does 
not yet have knowledge about 
the specific tools, or how to use 
them appropriately to 
encourage, develop and 
enhance the pupils’ ability to 
think, create, solve problems, 
express themselves, 
communicate, interact and 
collaborate with others. 
The teacher understands and 
uses the technology essentially 
to support the process of 
transmitting knowledge to the 
pupils, whereby the computer is 
largely used as a substitute and 
mediator, be it in the 
transmission of knowledge or in 
the way the learning is 
consolidated, through 
exercises, educational games 
or other kinds of strategies, 
essentially reactively 
responding to the stimuli 
presented. 
A teacher who knows that tools 
are available, that may be used 
to support and expand the 
thinking process, but who ends up 
using them inappropriately, with 
no consistent theoretical basis 
underpinning this goal, as well as 
not doing so in accordance with 
his own traditional method of 
teaching. 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
A teacher who centres his activity 
on the pupils, granting them a 
leading role in their learning. 
The teacher as someone who 
knows and uses tools that help 
him to think, along the lines of 
what Jonassen labelled 
“cognitive tools” (2007), but also 
a teacher who systematically 
reflects on what he does and 
how he does it, and based on this 
reflection introduces changes 
whenever necessary, thus 
improving his practice. 
CAPTION
ICT function 
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
Technological 
& metodological 
deficit 
Metodological 
deficit 
(Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
A teacher who also centres the 
activity on the pupils and 
reflects on what he does on a 
regular basis, although he does 
not yet have knowledge about 
the specific tools, or how to use 
them appropriately to 
encourage, develop and 
enhance the pupils’ ability to 
think, create, solve problems, 
express themselves, 
communicate, interact and 
collaborate with others. 
The teacher understands and 
uses the technology essentially 
to support the process of 
transmitting knowledge to the 
pupils, whereby the computer is 
largely used as a substitute and 
mediator, be it in the 
transmission of knowledge or in 
the way the learning is 
consolidated, through 
exercises, educational games 
or other kinds of strategies, 
essentially reactively 
responding to the stimuli 
presented. 
A teacher who knows that tools 
are available, that may be used 
to support and expand the 
thinking process, but who ends up 
using them inappropriately, with 
no consistent theoretical basis 
underpinning this goal, as well as 
not doing so in accordance with 
his own traditional method of 
teaching. 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
A teacher who centres his activity 
on the pupils, granting them a 
leading role in their learning. 
The teacher as someone who 
knows and uses tools that help 
him to think, along the lines of 
what Jonassen labelled 
“cognitive tools” (2007), but also 
a teacher who systematically 
reflects on what he does and 
how he does it, and based on this 
reflection introduces changes 
whenever necessary, thus 
improving his practice. 
CAPTION
CAPTION 
ICT function 
Teachers beliefs 
AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL 
II 
III 
I 
IV 
Potencial of 
transformation 
LEARNING 
FROM 
TECHNOLOGY 
LEARNING 
WITH 
TECHNOLOGY 
CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH 
TRADITIONAL APPROACH 
(Costa, 2012)
CONCLUSION 
IT is truly a revolutionary technology that, 
if properly used, 
could change education significantly 
it is the pedagogical way in which it is 
used that makes the difference 
(Salomon, 2002)
“it is about to get it [the dream] 
more possible!” 
Seymour Papert
THANK YOU! 
fernando albuquerque costa | fc@ie.ulisboa.pt 
UNIVERSITY OF LISBON | INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION
REFERENCES 
Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Surkes, M., Wade, A. & Zhang, D. A. (2006). 
Meta-analysis of instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: 
Preliminary results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational 
Research Association, San Francisco. 
Almeida, M. & Valente, J. (2011). Tecnologias e currículo: trajectórias convergentes ou 
divergentes? São Paulo: Paulus. 
Costa, F. & Peralta, H. (2006). Primary teachers' competence and confidence. Level 
regarding the use of ICT. In ED-MEDIA - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, 
Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Orlando. 
Costa, F., Fellner, R., Kruif, G., Kuittinen, E. & Tuulianen, M. (2006). Teacher professional 
development and digital portfolios. In APS (Ed.), Digital Portfolio as a strategy for teachers' 
professional development. Lisboa: Associação de Professores de Sintra. 69-90. 
Franssila, H. & Pehkonen, M. (2005). Why do ICT-strategy implementation in schools fail and 
ICT-ractices do not develop? In Media Skills and Competence Conference Proceedings. 
Tampere, Finland. 9-16. 
Wallin, E. (2005). The Rise and Fall of Swedish Educational Technology 1960–1980. 
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research (5). 437–460. 
Weston, M. & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop 
initiatives and educational change. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6). 5- 
24. (consultado em http://www.jtla.org).

Teachers and the use of digital technologies

  • 1.
    Teachers and the use of digital technologies: from the technological deficit to the methodological deficit FERNANDO ALBUQUERQUE COSTA Institute of Education UNIVERSITY OF LISBON TARTU | 2014 Conference «Theory meets practice: important issues in teaching practice»
  • 2.
    OUTLINE 1. introduction 2. the Portuguese context 3. main issues and some assumptions 4. which new teacher? 5. an orthogonal analysis 6. conclusion
  • 3.
    INITIAL TEACHER TRAININGCOMPUTER ACCESS DIGITAL RESSOURCES PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CURRICULUM I&D … SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INCENTIVES fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação
  • 4.
    THE PORTUGUESE CONTEXT MINERVA PROJECT ICT LEARNING OUTCOMES PROJECT 2008 1985 2010 From an exploratory work to a... National Educational Technology Plan
  • 5.
    THE PORTUGUESE CONTEXT National Educational Technology Plan (2008)  Almost all classrooms with at least one computer with Internet connection and video projector  An half with interactive boards…
  • 6.
    THE PORTUGUESE CONTEXT  Around 500.000 Magalhães where distributed for free* to all primary students…
  • 7.
    THE PORTUGUESE CONTEXT In Portugal, teacher-training practices for the use of ICT have relied, almost exclusively, on the traditional models and practices of teacher preparation in general (Barroso & Canário, 1999)… … leading mainly to a type of training that focuses on technology and the learning of tools, while forgetting or giving less priority to its effective integration in the curricular activity.
  • 8.
    THE MAIN ISSUES  Which digital competences of students?  Which implications for the curriculum? Which implications for teachers?  Which teacher training model?
  • 9.
    SOME CRUCIAL ASSUMPTIONS ICT as teacher tool >> ICT as student tool ICT to do the same >> ICT to do differently ICT as reproduction >> ICT as production ICT as a learning subject >> ICT as a mindtool Superficial learning >> Deep learning fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação
  • 10.
    ICT POTENTIAL FROMTHE CURRICULUM POINT OF VIEW Very poor, superficial and unclear role of ICT in the national curriculum, independently of the subject areas. fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação  ICT could add value…  ICT meaning innovation of learning processes  ICT much more than an instrumental support of learning subjects  ICT as a set of transversal competencies  ICT as a tool for both individual and social development of students (citizens)… EVIDENCES (CRUZ, 2010) (COSTA, 2010)
  • 11.
    THE PROBLEM “lack of confidence…”,  “negative emotional connotation on the relation to technology”…,  “not feeling competent enough to cope with the changes ICT compels them to…  “the inappropriate or insufficient training”  “lack of support…”  “organisational constraints at school”,  “too little time and too much to do… fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação (COSTA & PERALTA, 2006) EVIDENCES I
  • 12.
    THE PROBLEM EVIDENCESII  Technology is not an integrated resource within teaching activities;  Teachers use ICT without a full understanding of learning principles;  They know how to use computers but not in the classroom with their pupils;  ICT did not significantly change attitudes, roles and ways of teaching and learning. (PERALTA & COSTA, 2007) fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação
  • 13.
    THE PROBLEM SYNTHESIS Teachers are not conveniently prepared to realize and use the innovative potential of ICT in the curriculum. Traditional teacher’s training models aren’t adequate… (PERALTA, 2002; COSTA, 2005, 2008) fernando albuquerque costa | universidade de lisboa | instituto de educação
  • 14.
  • 15.
    WHICH NEW TEACHER? From this analysis it is possible to infer that the work with ICT for pedagogical aims needs to address issues within three main dimensions:  the first one has to do with teachers’ background knowledge and skills, that is, with what they have previously learned and how;  the second and crucial one refers to individual characteristics, both of an affective and cognitive nature;  the third one has to do with contextual factors, both an organisational and even of a macro structural order.
  • 16.
    AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSISTOOL ICT function Teachers beliefs II III I IV CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY (Costa, 2012) CAPTION
  • 17.
    AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSISTOOL ICT function Teachers beliefs II III I IV CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY (Costa, 2012) CAPTION
  • 18.
    ICT function ANORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL (Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs II III I IV LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH A teacher who centres his activity on the pupils, granting them a leading role in their learning. The teacher as someone who knows and uses tools that help him to think, along the lines of what Jonassen labelled “cognitive tools” (2007), but also a teacher who systematically reflects on what he does and how he does it, and based on this reflection introduces changes whenever necessary, thus improving his practice. CAPTION
  • 19.
    ICT function ANORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL (Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs II III I IV LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY A teacher who also centres the activity on the pupils and reflects on what he does on a regular basis, although he does not yet have knowledge about the specific tools, or how to use them appropriately to encourage, develop and enhance the pupils’ ability to think, create, solve problems, express themselves, communicate, interact and collaborate with others. A teacher who centres his activity on the pupils, granting them a leading role in their learning. The teacher as someone who knows and uses tools that help him to think, along the lines of what Jonassen labelled “cognitive tools” (2007), but also a teacher who systematically reflects on what he does and how he does it, and based on this reflection introduces changes whenever necessary, thus improving his practice. CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH CAPTION
  • 20.
    ICT function ANORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL (Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs II III I IV LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY A teacher who also centres the activity on the pupils and reflects on what he does on a regular basis, although he does not yet have knowledge about the specific tools, or how to use them appropriately to encourage, develop and enhance the pupils’ ability to think, create, solve problems, express themselves, communicate, interact and collaborate with others. The teacher understands and uses the technology essentially to support the process of transmitting knowledge to the pupils, whereby the computer is largely used as a substitute and mediator, be it in the transmission of knowledge or in the way the learning is consolidated, through exercises, educational games or other kinds of strategies, essentially reactively responding to the stimuli presented. CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH A teacher who centres his activity on the pupils, granting them a leading role in their learning. The teacher as someone who knows and uses tools that help him to think, along the lines of what Jonassen labelled “cognitive tools” (2007), but also a teacher who systematically reflects on what he does and how he does it, and based on this reflection introduces changes whenever necessary, thus improving his practice. CAPTION
  • 21.
    ICT function ANORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL (Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs II III I IV LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY A teacher who also centres the activity on the pupils and reflects on what he does on a regular basis, although he does not yet have knowledge about the specific tools, or how to use them appropriately to encourage, develop and enhance the pupils’ ability to think, create, solve problems, express themselves, communicate, interact and collaborate with others. The teacher understands and uses the technology essentially to support the process of transmitting knowledge to the pupils, whereby the computer is largely used as a substitute and mediator, be it in the transmission of knowledge or in the way the learning is consolidated, through exercises, educational games or other kinds of strategies, essentially reactively responding to the stimuli presented. A teacher who knows that tools are available, that may be used to support and expand the thinking process, but who ends up using them inappropriately, with no consistent theoretical basis underpinning this goal, as well as not doing so in accordance with his own traditional method of teaching. CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH A teacher who centres his activity on the pupils, granting them a leading role in their learning. The teacher as someone who knows and uses tools that help him to think, along the lines of what Jonassen labelled “cognitive tools” (2007), but also a teacher who systematically reflects on what he does and how he does it, and based on this reflection introduces changes whenever necessary, thus improving his practice. CAPTION
  • 22.
    ICT function ANORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL Technological & metodological deficit Metodological deficit (Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs II III I IV LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY A teacher who also centres the activity on the pupils and reflects on what he does on a regular basis, although he does not yet have knowledge about the specific tools, or how to use them appropriately to encourage, develop and enhance the pupils’ ability to think, create, solve problems, express themselves, communicate, interact and collaborate with others. The teacher understands and uses the technology essentially to support the process of transmitting knowledge to the pupils, whereby the computer is largely used as a substitute and mediator, be it in the transmission of knowledge or in the way the learning is consolidated, through exercises, educational games or other kinds of strategies, essentially reactively responding to the stimuli presented. A teacher who knows that tools are available, that may be used to support and expand the thinking process, but who ends up using them inappropriately, with no consistent theoretical basis underpinning this goal, as well as not doing so in accordance with his own traditional method of teaching. CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH A teacher who centres his activity on the pupils, granting them a leading role in their learning. The teacher as someone who knows and uses tools that help him to think, along the lines of what Jonassen labelled “cognitive tools” (2007), but also a teacher who systematically reflects on what he does and how he does it, and based on this reflection introduces changes whenever necessary, thus improving his practice. CAPTION
  • 23.
    ICT function ANORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL Technological & metodological deficit Metodological deficit (Costa, 2012) Teachers beliefs II III I IV LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY A teacher who also centres the activity on the pupils and reflects on what he does on a regular basis, although he does not yet have knowledge about the specific tools, or how to use them appropriately to encourage, develop and enhance the pupils’ ability to think, create, solve problems, express themselves, communicate, interact and collaborate with others. The teacher understands and uses the technology essentially to support the process of transmitting knowledge to the pupils, whereby the computer is largely used as a substitute and mediator, be it in the transmission of knowledge or in the way the learning is consolidated, through exercises, educational games or other kinds of strategies, essentially reactively responding to the stimuli presented. A teacher who knows that tools are available, that may be used to support and expand the thinking process, but who ends up using them inappropriately, with no consistent theoretical basis underpinning this goal, as well as not doing so in accordance with his own traditional method of teaching. CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH A teacher who centres his activity on the pupils, granting them a leading role in their learning. The teacher as someone who knows and uses tools that help him to think, along the lines of what Jonassen labelled “cognitive tools” (2007), but also a teacher who systematically reflects on what he does and how he does it, and based on this reflection introduces changes whenever necessary, thus improving his practice. CAPTION
  • 24.
    CAPTION ICT function Teachers beliefs AN ORTHOGONAL ANALYSIS TOOL II III I IV Potencial of transformation LEARNING FROM TECHNOLOGY LEARNING WITH TECHNOLOGY CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACH TRADITIONAL APPROACH (Costa, 2012)
  • 25.
    CONCLUSION IT istruly a revolutionary technology that, if properly used, could change education significantly it is the pedagogical way in which it is used that makes the difference (Salomon, 2002)
  • 26.
    “it is aboutto get it [the dream] more possible!” Seymour Papert
  • 27.
    THANK YOU! fernandoalbuquerque costa | fc@ie.ulisboa.pt UNIVERSITY OF LISBON | INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION
  • 28.
    REFERENCES Abrami, P.C.,Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Surkes, M., Wade, A. & Zhang, D. A. (2006). Meta-analysis of instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: Preliminary results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. Almeida, M. & Valente, J. (2011). Tecnologias e currículo: trajectórias convergentes ou divergentes? São Paulo: Paulus. Costa, F. & Peralta, H. (2006). Primary teachers' competence and confidence. Level regarding the use of ICT. In ED-MEDIA - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Orlando. Costa, F., Fellner, R., Kruif, G., Kuittinen, E. & Tuulianen, M. (2006). Teacher professional development and digital portfolios. In APS (Ed.), Digital Portfolio as a strategy for teachers' professional development. Lisboa: Associação de Professores de Sintra. 69-90. Franssila, H. & Pehkonen, M. (2005). Why do ICT-strategy implementation in schools fail and ICT-ractices do not develop? In Media Skills and Competence Conference Proceedings. Tampere, Finland. 9-16. Wallin, E. (2005). The Rise and Fall of Swedish Educational Technology 1960–1980. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research (5). 437–460. Weston, M. & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives and educational change. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6). 5- 24. (consultado em http://www.jtla.org).

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Partindo da constatação de que as tecnologias de informação e comunicação têm um papel central na sociedade contemporânea, constituindo um referente cultural de grande importância para os jovens de hoje, emerge com naturalidade a questão de saber o que pode a escola fazer para lidar com os múltiplos desafios daí decorrentes. Não apenas em termos do cumprimento da missão que lhe é atribuída de desenvolvimento dos indivíduos, de cada indivíduo, mas também em termos do seu próprio desenvolvimento enquanto organização. Dir-se-ia, aliás, que, pela sua natureza, a escola tem uma responsabilidade acrescida hoje, quando se trata de preparar os cidadãos para compreenderem e atuarem de forma consciente e crítica no mundo digital que os rodeia. Tratando-se de coisa nova, face aos objetivos e métodos tradicionalmente utilizados, assentes sobretudo no desenvolvimento de uma literacia verbal, e dado o enorme potencial que, para muitos, as tecnologias digitais encerram, precisamente ao nível da inovação dos processos de ensinar e de aprender, dir-se-ia, por outro lado, que é a reinvenção da própria escola que está em jogo neste início do Séc. XXI. Na verdade, o mundo digital e a imersão das tecnologias de informação e comunicação no universo escolar podem significar um processo em direção a uma nova escola sobretudo se os seus principais agentes, os professores, tomarem em suas mãos esse desafio e estiverem cientes das oportunidades que ele representa em termos de renovação e transformação dos modos como se ensina. Os novos e múltiplos modos de representação da realidade, de expressão do pensamento e de comunicação (novas literacias), aliadas a um crescimento exponencial de informação em formato digital, é algo que não pode ser ignorado e afeta de igual forma todas as áreas do currículo. Como contributo para o objetivo de ajudar a equacionar desafios e oportunidades de transformação no seio da escola, explorar-se-ão nesta conferência algumas das mudanças mais significativas verificadas nas práticas de leitura e escrita tendo como base suportes e formatos digitais, bem como o seu impacto no que significa hoje ler e escrever.