The document provides feedback on a contents page for a rock/indie magazine. The feedback indicates that the fonts, colors, layout, language, and images used on the contents page are conventional and suitable for the genre. Minor suggestions are made to darken the text of subheadings and remove a shaped background from the page number. Overall, the feedback informs the creator that no major changes need to be made to the contents page as the design elements receive positive reviews and achieve the goal of looking like a professional magazine.

1. Contents Page Feedback
RECEIVING FEEDBACK ON MY CONTENTS PAGE IN ORDER TO
IMPROVE IT.

2. Do you like the fonts used? Why? How
could they be improved?
1. Yeah i like the wide variety of fonts, it suits the genre as well :)))
2. Yes, there is a lot of variety and they look conventional for a rock/indie magazine.
3. Yeah I like the fonts, you could consider making the description of each subheading a darker
grey :D
4. I liked the fonts used and honestly, i don't actually think you could improve them.
5. i like them coz they're bold!
I chose not to change my fonts after receiving this feedback about
them.

3. Do you like the colours used? Why? How
could you improve them?
1. Yeah they contrast which is conventional :)
2. I do like the colours used, they are very typical for this type of magazine and they also tie in
with your house style.
3. Yeah I like the colours, they're very conventional :)
4. They are really good
5. dark colours are good for the rock theme
Again, I did not change any colours after receiving this feedback as
they are conventional and all contrast well.

4. Do you like the layout? Why? How could it
be improved?
1. Yeah because it looks like a rock magazine
2. Yeah, it is very 'KERRANG' style and I think the layout is both conventional and suitable for
your magazine.
3. Yes the layout is great :) don't change anything!:D
4. Its really conventional to a music magazine and it can't be improved as it is as good as it
could get
5. yes! it's busy & conventional, looks professional
The feedback informs me that the layout is conventional and busy,
which is what I was aiming for.

5. Do you like the language used? Why?
How could you improve the language?
1. yes
2. Yes, the language used helps to identify the genre of your magazine. You have included the
words 'indie' and 'rock' which helps signify your genre of magazine.
3. Yes :) it's very conventional and descriptive
4. TBH, i only skimmed it but it is quite good from what i read
5. yeah it's informal & relaxed,
The feedback indicates the language does not need improving.

6. Do you like the images used? Why? How
would you improve the images?
1. yes the variety is sick
2. Yes, the technical elements within the photo clearly portray your genre and look really
professional.
3. Yes, I especially like the image at the top :)
4. I like the images, although they are posed they don't really look it
5. they're fun, & not like plain
This feedback tells me the images are good and do not need to be
changed.

7. Do you think the Contents Page looks
conventional? Why? Is there any way I could
make it look more conventional?
1. yeah :)
2. Yeah I do, I really like the layout, use of cinematography and everything really! I don't think it
needs to be improved! :)
3. Yes, you use columns, images and make good use of subheadings, and you also include the
editors letter, there's nothing really you could do to make it more conventional :)
4. Yes it does and i don't really think so yes, the images, fonts & layout are conventional & if you
saw it om a shelf you wouldn't think it was done by a student!! the one thing i don't like
about it is the shape with the page number in
I will remove the shape behind the page number on the main image.