This document discusses complications that can arise in patients with cirrhosis, including portal hypertension, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. It provides details on the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of these complications. Specifically, it focuses on portal hypertension and the development of varices, describing the risks of variceal bleeding and approaches to prevention and management. It also covers ascites extensively, explaining how and why it develops in cirrhosis and its treatment with diuretics and sodium restriction.
In this presentation I have tried to cover renal disorder associated with vascular pathology of kidney. Classification, various disorder in detail with histopathology images H&E and special stains and clinical presentations. Hope it helps understanding the entity better.
Presentation by DR. MISHAL on the topic of NON CIRRHOTIC PORTAL HYPERTENSION. Its a grey area but very important topic particularly for FCPS residents .
lupus nephritis is a autoimmune disease, commonly seen in adult and child and the medical or nursing care is also very important for this type of disease condition.
In this presentation I have tried to cover renal disorder associated with vascular pathology of kidney. Classification, various disorder in detail with histopathology images H&E and special stains and clinical presentations. Hope it helps understanding the entity better.
Presentation by DR. MISHAL on the topic of NON CIRRHOTIC PORTAL HYPERTENSION. Its a grey area but very important topic particularly for FCPS residents .
lupus nephritis is a autoimmune disease, commonly seen in adult and child and the medical or nursing care is also very important for this type of disease condition.
Surgery Resident clinical seminar on the management of a 60yr old male with upper gastrointestinal bleeding presented to the department of surgery, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital, Okolobiri, Bayelsa State
Anaesthesia for liver transplantation.pptxKLahari7
Introduction
Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease regardless of its aetiology. Ever since the first transplant interventions in the 1960s, mortality rates after LT have significantly improved and have led to an increase in the number of successful procedures and improved outcomes.
Significant challenges remain for the transplant team as the procedure is performed on high-risk patients with impaired cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal and coagulation systems. Recent publications have indicated that transplant candidates are older, sicker and with multiple associate co-morbidities and organ dysfunctions compared to those treated in the past. Adequate perioperative care is essential for a prompt graft function which will improve organ system recovery and recipient’s quality of life [1].
Though there is a potential worldwide liver graft shortage, the expansion of the donor pool using marginal donors and increasing donor age has resulted, never the less, in reduced waiting list mortality [2]. A successful LT requires teams with a particular set of skills and competences, including a complete and detailed understanding of the multi-organic pathophysiology of liver failure and its implications and management during the three stages of surgery.
There have been many innovations, updates and procedural changes in the anaesthetic management of patients during this time. This article gives an overview of the current literature regarding anaesthetic management during liver transplantation and its singularities during the three stages of surgery.
Go to:
Indications for liver transplantation
The indications for LT in patients with acute and chronic liver failure should be assessed independent of the aetiology and are listed in Table 1 [3].
Table 1
Indications for liver transplantation
Class Disease
Non-cholestatic liver disease HepatitisB
HepatitisC
HepatitisD
HepatitisA
Alcoholic liver disease
Autoimmune hepatitis
Cryptogenic cirrhosis
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
Other
Cholestatic liver disease Primary biliary cirrhosis
Secondary biliary cirrhosis (Caroli disease, choledochal cyst)
Primary sclerosing cholangitis
Other
Malignant disease Hepatocellular carcinoma
Cholangiocarcinoma
Hepatoblastoma
Other
Extrahepatic biliary atresia or hypoplasia Alagille syndrome
Other
Metabolic diseases Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
Crigler-Najjar disease, Type I
Byler’s disease
Glycogen storage disease, Type I
Wilson’s disease
Hemochromatosis
Tyrosinemia
Wolman’s disease
Familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy
Primary hyperoxaluria type 1
Other
Hepatic vein thrombosis Budd-Chiari
Acute hepatic failure Hepatitis
Drugs
Unknown aetiology
Re-transplantation Primary non-function
Hepatic artery thrombosis
Acute/chronic rejection
Open in a separate window
The US and European countries have been using the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score for organ allocation since 2007. This is a grading system from 6 to 40 points, which depen
Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex System Analysis, S...Oleg Kshivets
RESULTS: Overall life span (LS) was 2252.1±1742.5 days and cumulative 5-year survival (5YS) reached 73.2%, 10 years – 64.8%, 20 years – 42.5%. 513 LCP lived more than 5 years (LS=3124.6±1525.6 days), 148 LCP – more than 10 years (LS=5054.4±1504.1 days).199 LCP died because of LC (LS=562.7±374.5 days). 5YS of LCP after bi/lobectomies was significantly superior in comparison with LCP after pneumonectomies (78.1% vs.63.7%, P=0.00001 by log-rank test). AT significantly improved 5YS (66.3% vs. 34.8%) (P=0.00000 by log-rank test) only for LCP with N1-2. Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: phase transition (PT) early-invasive LC in terms of synergetics, PT N0—N12, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells- CC and blood cells subpopulations), G1-3, histology, glucose, AT, blood cell circuit, prothrombin index, heparin tolerance, recalcification time (P=0.000-0.038). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and PT early-invasive LC (rank=1), PT N0—N12 (rank=2), thrombocytes/CC (3), erythrocytes/CC (4), eosinophils/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), segmented neutrophils/CC (8), stick neutrophils/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10); leucocytes/CC (11). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (area under ROC curve=1.0; error=0.0).
CONCLUSIONS: 5YS of LCP after radical procedures significantly depended on: 1) PT early-invasive cancer; 2) PT N0--N12; 3) cell ratio factors; 4) blood cell circuit; 5) biochemical factors; 6) hemostasis system; 7) AT; 8) LC characteristics; 9) LC cell dynamics; 10) surgery type: lobectomy/pneumonectomy; 11) anthropometric data. Optimal diagnosis and treatment strategies for LC are: 1) screening and early detection of LC; 2) availability of experienced thoracic surgeons because of complexity of radical procedures; 3) aggressive en block surgery and adequate lymph node dissection for completeness; 4) precise prediction; 5) adjuvant chemoimmunoradiotherapy for LCP with unfavorable prognosis.
Report Back from SGO 2024: What’s the Latest in Cervical Cancer?bkling
Are you curious about what’s new in cervical cancer research or unsure what the findings mean? Join Dr. Emily Ko, a gynecologic oncologist at Penn Medicine, to learn about the latest updates from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2024 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Dr. Ko will discuss what the research presented at the conference means for you and answer your questions about the new developments.
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,sisternakatoto
263778731218 Abortion Clinic /Pills In Harare ,ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group ABORTION WOMEN’S CLINIC +27730423979 IN women clinic we believe that every woman should be able to make choices in her pregnancy. Our job is to provide compassionate care, safety,affordable and confidential services. That’s why we have won the trust from all generations of women all over the world. we use non surgical method(Abortion pills) to terminate…Dr.LISA +27730423979women Clinic is committed to providing the highest quality of obstetrical and gynecological care to women of all ages. Our dedicated staff aim to treat each patient and her health concerns with compassion and respect.Our dedicated group of receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a teamof receptionists, nurses, and physicians have worked together as a team wwww.lisywomensclinic.co.za/
Knee anatomy and clinical tests 2024.pdfvimalpl1234
This includes all relevant anatomy and clinical tests compiled from standard textbooks, Campbell,netter etc..It is comprehensive and best suited for orthopaedicians and orthopaedic residents.
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
Pulmonary Thromboembolism - etilogy, types, medical- Surgical and nursing man...VarunMahajani
Disruption of blood supply to lung alveoli due to blockage of one or more pulmonary blood vessels is called as Pulmonary thromboembolism. In this presentation we will discuss its causes, types and its management in depth.
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Ve...kevinkariuki227
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
TEST BANK for Operations Management, 14th Edition by William J. Stevenson, Verified Chapters 1 - 19, Complete Newest Version.pdf
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/lK81BzxMqdo
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/Ve4P0COk9OI
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
4. Definition
• Diffuse fibrosis following hepatocyte
destruction and nodular regeneration
• Multiple causes
– All may lead to cirrhosis
• Asymptomatic (compensated)
• Symptomatic (decompensated)
– portal hypertension
– hepatic failure
5. The Natural History of cirrhosis
Decompensation:
•Variceal hemorrhage
•Ascites
•Encephalopathy
•Jaundice
D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies.
J Hepatol. 2006;44:217-231.
7. Natural History of Cirrhosis
Stage Definition 1-year
mortality
Median
Survival
1 Compensated without
varices
1% >12 years
2 Compensated with varices 3%
3 Decompensated with ascites
without variceal
hemorrhage
20% ~2 years
4 Decompensated with/out
ascites with variceal
hemorrhage
57%
D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies.
J Hepatol. 2006;44:217-231.
10. Arroyo, V. & Fernández, J. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2011
Mechanisms Leading to Circulatory &
Renal Dysfunction in Cirrhosis
11. 6040 80 100 120 140 160
0
40
60
80
20
200
100
Months
Probability of
survival
All patients with
cirrhosis
Decompensated
cirrhosis
180
Gines et. al., Hepatology 1987;7:122
Median survival
~ 9 years
Median survival
~ 9 years
Median survival
~ 1.6 years
Median survival
~ 1.6 years
Decompensation shortens survival
14. Pressure Measurements
Portal Venous Pressure (PVP)
Normal = 5-10 mm Hg
Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient
(HVPG)
= portal venous pressure - hepatic
venous pressure or RA pressure
Normal = 1-5 mm Hg
PORTAL HTN
15. • HVPG ≥6 mm Hg
• HVPG ≥10mm Hg – clinically significant
• HVPG ≥12 mmHg, risk of variceal
bleeding and the development of ascites
• HVPG >20 mmHg – bleeding unlikely to
respond to conventional therapy
Definition of Portal Hypertension
16. Pathophysiology
Portal Hypertension
• Increased intrahepatic vascular
resistance
– Fixed component
• Sinusoidal fibrosis
• Compression by regenerative nodules
– Functional component
• Vasoconstriction
– Deficiency in intrahepatic NO
– Enhanced activity of vasoconstrictors
20. Varices
• Common lethal complication
• ~ 50% of patients with cirrhosis
• More likely to bleed in more
decompensated disease
– 40% of Child A
– 85% of Child C
Practice Guidelines: Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2086-2102
22. LaPlace’s Law
T = wall tension
P1= intravariceal pressure
P2 = esophageal lumen pressure
r = vessel radius
W = wall thickness
T = (P1-P2) x (r/W)
23. Variceal Bleed: Risk Factors
• High Gradient
• Large esophageal varices
• Endoscopic features
– red wale markings
– cherry red signs
24. Varices
• All patients with new
dx of cirrhosis should
undergo EGD to
screen for varices
• High risk for bleeding:
– Childs B/C (more
evidence of
decompensation)
– Large varices
– Red wale markings
25. Varices
• Primary prophylaxis (never bled)
– If no varices: no need for nonselective B
blocker
– If small varices: no long term evidence to use B
blocker unless red signs present
– If large varices:
• High risk patient (red wale, childs B/C): B blocker
(nadolol/ propranolol) or prophylactic banding
• Low risk patients: B blocker
– Titrate B blocker to max tolerated dose
26. Got one for you…Variceal Bleed
• Blood transfusion: Target Hgb=8
• Antibiotics: norfloxacin, IV cipro, ceftriaxone
(probably best)
• Vasopressin, telipressin, octreotide, vapreotide x
3-5 days
– Splanchnic vasoconstriction, reduced portal flow
• EGD within 12 hours
– Banding(almost always) or sclerotherapy (rare)
27. Variceal Bleed: When Banding Fails
• Balloon Tamponade
(Blakemore /
Minnesota tube)
temporizing measure
for up to 24 hours
• TIPS
28. After the Bleed
• Secondary prophylaxis
– All patients who have has a variceal bleed
– Combination of B Blocker and serial banding
– Continue banding (usually outpt) until varices
are eradicated
29. Take Home: Varices
• All patients with cirrhosis should be screened with
EGD
• Primary prophylaxis
– Large varices / decompensated patients : usually
nonselective B blocker
– Banding and “sicker” patients
• Variceal bleed: abx, octreotide, Hgb 8,scope with
banding
– Blakemore/TIPS when in trouble
• Secondary prophylaxis
– Combination B blocker / banding to eradication
32. Definition
• Fluid within the
peritoneal cavity
• Occurs in 50-60% of
patients with
cirrhosis over 10-15
years
• Mixture of liver and
intestinal lymph
33. Cirrhosis Heart failure
Peritoneal tuberculosis
Cirrhosis is the Most Common Cause of
Ascites
Others
•Pancreatic
•Budd-Chiari syndrome
•Nephrogenic ascites
Peritoneal malignancy
CIRRHOSIS IS THE MOST COMMON CAUSE OF ASCITES
85%
33
36. Hepatic Sinusoid
• Unlike other capillaries, normal hepatic sinusoids
lack a basement membrane.
• The sinusoidal endothelial cells themselves
contain large fenestrae (200-400 nm in diameter)
• These two features make the normal hepatic
sinusoid very permeable with movement of fluid
depending mostly on hydrostatic pressure
• Normal portal sinusoid pressure is 3-4 mmHg
36
37. THE PERMEABILITY OF THE HEPATIC SINUSOID VARIES IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
In cirrhosis, the
hepatic
sinusoid is
LESS leaky
The Permeability of the Hepatic Sinusoid
Varies in Health and Disease
Hepatocyt
es
The normal
sinusoid is
“leaky”
Sinusoid
Sinusoid
fibrous tissue deposition
“capillarization” of
sinusoid
no basement
membrane
37
40. Treatment of Ascites
• Usually responds to Na restriction and
diuretics
– When SAAG >1.1
• Dual diuretics:
– Furosemide AND Spirololactone
• Single daily dosing (40/ 100)
• Na restriction
– <2000mg/day
• Fluid restriction is usually NOT necessary
41. Patients with Refractory Ascites Have Worse
Survival than Patients with Diuretic-Responsive Ascites
Survival
probability
1.0
.8
.6
.4
.2
0
120 24 4836 60 8472
Refractory ascites
Non refractory ascites
p<0.00
1
Months
Salerno et al., Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88:514
43. With Large / Tense ascites
• Therapeutic paracentesis followed by
diuretics / Na restriction
• 6-8 g/of albumin per liter of ascites
removed
• Midodrine may be helpful
– Shown to increase BP, survival benefit
• Consideration of liver transplantation
referral
44. Complications of Ascites
• Hepatorenal syndrome
– “The HRS Cocktail”
• Albumin + Octreotide + Midodrine
– In ICU:
• Albumin + Norepineprhine
• Hepatic Hydrothorax
– NO CHEST TUBE!!
– Same as acsites (Na restrict / diuretics)
47. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
(SBP)
• Tap all patients admitted to hospital or for
any reason rub you the wrong way…
• Diagnosis:
– Culture NOT needed (but send it anyways)
– PMN >250cells/mm3
• Treatment:
– 3rd
gen cephalpsporin ie cefotaxime 2g q8
– Albumin 1.5g/kg day 1 and 1.0 g/kg day 3
• Cr >1, BUN >30, or bili >4
48. SBP : prevention
• GI bleed and cirrhosis
– Ceftriaxone or norflox x 7 days
• If prior episode of SBP, long term
prophylaxis
– Daily norfloxacin or bactrim
50. Definition
• Reversible alteration in the
neuropsychiatric function
• Due to shunting of neurotoxic
nitrogenous products
• Lack of hepatic detoxification
52. 1 2 3 4
Coma
Somnolence
Confusion
Drowsiness
??
?
?
? ?
Stages
HE
Adapted from AGA Teaching Slides.
53. Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE)
• 10-50% of cirrhotics
• 40% survival 1 year after 1st
episode
• 15% survival 3 years after 1st
episode
• Disturbance in diurnal sleep pattern
precedes neurologic signs
54. Minimal Encephalopathy
• 15-30% have abnormal NCT or abnormal
EEG without overt encephalopathy
• Significance unclear
– impaired health-related quality of life
(HRQOL) compared to patients with cirrhosis
without minimal HE
– impairs driving capacity and poor insight into
their driving skills
• Not replicated in real life conditions
Metab Brain Dis 1998 Jun;13(2):159-72
Hepatology 1998 Jul;28(1):45-9
Metab Brain Dis 1995 Sep;10(3):239-48
55. Kappus et al Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Volume 10, Issue 11, 2012, 1208 - 1219
Classification of Hepatic
Encephalopathy
56. Management of HE
• Identify / treat precipitating factors
• Empiric treatment
– Rifaximin
– Lactulose
58. Ammonia Levels in HE
• May be correlation of ammonia levels and
severity of HE
• Diagnosis and treatment is clinical
– Should not change management
– No utility in following levels
59. Treatment of HE
• Lactulose
– First line
– 2-3 soft BM/ day
• Rifaximin
– 550 BID
– Reduced ammonia
producing bacteria
60. Long Term Management of HE
• After initial HE event
– Usually on therapy indefinitely or until liver
transplant
– Long term use of lactulose and or rifaximin
• High protein diet is OK (and preferred in
cirrhosis)
• Patients with HE should NOT undergo
TIPS if possible
62. Pathophysiology
• Occurs in setting of cirrhosis and
ascites
• Severe renal arterial vasoconstriction
• Compromised glomerular filtration rate
• Normal kidney structure
63. 1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Survival
Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome
Months
Gines et al. NEJM 2004;350:1646-1654.
P<0.001
Creatinine <1.2 mg/dL
Creatinine 1.2-1.5mg/dL
Creatinine >1.5mg/dL
1.0
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.0
1 2 3 4 5
Years
Survival
Refractory ascites
Survival in Cirrhosis
Based on Level
of Renal Dysfunction
Survival Among Patients
With Cirrhosis and HRS
1 2 3 4 500 6
0.6
00
Survival is Decreased
with Renal Dysfunction
64. Setting
•Advanced liver disease: cirrhosis, alcoholic hepatitits,
fulminant hepatitis
•Sometimes precipitated by overdiuresis, GI bleed, use of
nephrotoxic agents
Clinical Features
•Ascites • Oliguria
•Hypotension • Jaundice
Course
•Typically death within weeks
Hepatorenal Syndrome
66. Type 1 and Type 2 HRS
• HRS Type 1
– Rapidly progressive
– Precipitating event frequent, esp SBP
– Very short survival
• HRS Type 2
– Slow onset of moderate renal insufficiency
– Poor response to diuretics (refractory ascites)
– Longer survival
67. 0 2 4 6 8 1210
Months
1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Survival
probability
0
Type 2
p = 0.001
Gines et al., Lancet 2003; 362:1819
Type 1
Prognosis in Type 1 and 2 HRS
68. Precipitants of Type 1 HRS
• Infection
– Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP)
– Urinary tract infection
– Cellulitis
• Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
• NSAID use
• Large volume paracentesis without albumin
• Adrenal insufficiency
69. Salerno et al. Gut 2007
HRS Diagnostic Criteria
1. Cirrhosis with ascites
2. Serum CR >1.5 mg/dL
3. No improvement in serum CR after at least 2
days of diuretic withdrawal & volume
expansion with albumin (max 100g/day)
4. Absence of shock
5. No current or recent nephrotoxic drugs
6. Absence of parenchymal kidney disease
70. Clinical Characteristics of HRS
Ascites
Advanced liver disease
Low mean arterial pressure (median 74
mmHg)
Low serum Na (median 127 mEq/L)
Low urinary output
Do not rely on urine Na or urine sediment to
differentiate HRS from ATN
Garcia-Tsao et al. Hepatology 2008
71. Prevention of AKI in cirrhotics
Careful use of diuretics & lactulose
Albumin after large volume paracentesis
Avoid NSAIDs & aminoglycosides
Albumin & antibiotics for treatment of SBP
Primary prophylaxis of SBP with
antibiotics
Antibiotics for 5-7 days at time of GI bleed
72. Precipitants
• Treatment principles
• Treat the underlying precipitant promptly
• More quickly addressed the more likely to have
improvement in HRS
• Have a high suspicion for an occult
precipitating event in any liver patient who has
ARF
• Even with removal of the precipitant, HRS
may be irreversible
72
75. Hepatocellular Carcinoma
• Seen in cirrhosis
– Exception: HBV (can be noncirrhotic)
• Diagnosis by US, CT scan, MRI
– Histology is not essential
• Alpha-fetal protein level may be elevated
76. Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
• Surveillance
– Screen all patients with cirrhosis for HCC
• Up to 8% risk of HCC/year
– Also male HBV carriers >40 and female HBV >50
(even if they don’t have cirrhosis)
• Up to 0.6% risk of HCC/year
• For boards…screen with ultrasound q 6 months
– No benefit to shorten interval
– No benefit to screen with AFP
– In practice many still use cross sectional imaging and
AFP to screen as well
77. Diagnosis of HCC
• Usually with imaging, histology used less
often
• If lesion seen on u/s> 1cm then follow up
with CT or MR
– If hypervascular lesion that washes out on
portal venous phase then dx with HCC
– No bx needed
80. Treatment of HCC
• Resection
– Less commonly used
– Noncirrhotic or very well compensated
• Well preserved synthetic function (INR near
normal)
• Normal bili
• Low portal pressure
– Possibly for noncirrhotic HBV patient..
– No role for adjuvant chemotherapy
81. Treatment of HCC
• Local ablation
– Alcohol injection
• Only in smaller tumors
• Not used very often
– Radiofrequency ablation
• Better for larger tumors
– May use as a bridge to liver transplantation
82. Treatment of HCC
• Transarterial
Chemoebolization
(TACE)
– Non curative
– Nonsurgical patients
– Large multifocal HCC
– No vascular invasion
– No extrahepatic spread
83. Treatment of HCC
• Liver transplantation
– Curative approach
– Milan Criteria
• 1 tumor <5cm
• Up to 3 tumors <3cm
• No vascular / extrahepatic spread
– Tumor exception points
• MELD=22
84. Treatment of HCC
• Sorafenib
– Last resort
– Cannot benefit from resection, transplantation,
ablation or TACE
– Multifocal disease with well preserved hepatic
function
– SHARP trial median survival 10.7 months vs
7.9 months average survival
85. Take Home: HCC
• Screen patients with u/s q6 months if they
have cirrhosis / older patients with HBV
• Usually radiographic diagnosis
– Biopsy rarely needed
– Cross sectional imaging look for “arterial
enhancement” and “washout”
• Treatment:
– Possibly “curative”: ablation, resection,
transplant
– Palliative: TACE, sorafenib
87. Prognostic Models
• Tools for predicting disease severity
and death
– Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score
– Model or End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)
88. Child-Pugh-Turcotte
Classification
1 2 3
Albumin (g/dl) >3.5 2.8-3.5 <2.8
Total bilirubin (mg/dl) <2 2-3 >3
Prothrombin time (INR) <1.7 1.7-2.3 >2.3
Ascites None Medically Uncontrolled
controlled
Encephalopathy (grade) 0 I-II III-IV
Class: A = 5-6 points, B = 7-9 points, C = 10-15 points
89. MELD Score
• Model for Endstage Liver Disease
• MELD = INR, Creatinine, Bilirubin
• Higher scores (6 to 40) indicate worse
prognosis
• MELD >15 would benefit from liver
transplant
90. Conclusions
• The transition from compensated
cirrhosis to decompensated cirrhosis
carries a significant change in mortality
• Clinical diagnosis is important
• Simultaneous compications may (and
usually arise)
Editor's Notes
Slide 204
CIRRHOSIS IS THE MOST COMMON CAUSE OF ASCITES
Cirrhosis is the most common cause of ascites, accounting for 80% of cases. Peritoneal malignancy, heart failure and peritoneal tuberculosis are also common, accounting for another 15% of the cases. Less common causes of ascites include pancreatitis, hemodialysis and the Budd-Chiari syndrome. Of the most common causes, cirrhosis and heart failure are portal sinusoidal hypertensive causes of ascites, while peritoneal malignancy and tuberculosis are non-portal hypertensive causes.
Runyon BA, In: Diseases of the Liver. Eds. Schiff L and Schiff ER,1993; Seventh Edition:990
Slide 207
THE PERMEABILITY OF THE HEPATIC SINUSOID VARIES IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
Unlike other capillaries, normal hepatic sinusoids lack a basement membrane. The sinusoidal endothelial cells themselves contain large fenestrae (200-400 nm in diameter), allowing passage of large molecules with molecular weight up to 250,000. These two features make the normal hepatic sinusoid very permeable with movement of fluid depending mostly on hydrostatic pressure. In cirrhosis, sinusoids become less permeable, as fibrous tissue is deposited in the space of Disse leading to the “capillarization” of the sinusoid, however these structures are still more permeable than splanchnic capillaries.
Slide 350
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
This slide demonstrates how ammonia bypasses the liver, either through porto-systemic collaterals or through a created shunt (transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt) and ultimately reaches the brain.