Background: Many cities across the world are beginning to shift their mobility solution away from the private cars and towards more environmentally friendly and citizen-focused means. Hamburg, Oslo, Helsinki, and Madrid have recently announced their plans to become (partly) private car free cities. Other cities like Paris, Milan, Chengdu, Masdar, Dublin, Brussels, Copenhagen, Bogota, and Hyderabad have measures that aim at reducing motorized traffic including implementing car free days, investing in cycling infrastructure and pedestrianization, restricting parking spaces and considerable increases in public transport provision. Such plans and measures are particularly implemented with the declared aim of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These reductions are also likely to benefit public health.
Micro RNA genes and their likely influence in rice (Oryza sativa L.) dynamic ...
Car free cities bmdc meeting 9th september 2016 haneen
1. CAR FREE CITIES
AND PUBLIC
HEALTH
Haneen Khreis, Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds
Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, ISGlobabl-CREAL, Barcelona
2. THE CAR
• The car is an important part of the transport system --
brought increased mobility, convenience, employment,
technological advances and economic prosperity
• To a large extent, the car defined the past century and is
hard to imagine a world without cars
7. A NEW MOVE
• Many cities are beginning
to shift their mobility
solutions away from the
private car and towards
more environmentally
friendly and citizen-
focused mobility
10. A NEW MOVE
• Hamburg, Helsinki, Madrid and Oslo (2019) have
recently announced their plans to become (partly)
private car free cities
• Other cities like Bogota, Brussels, Chengdu,
Copenhagen, Dublin, Hyderabad, Masdar, Milan, New
York and Paris have different measures that aim at
reducing traffic including implementing
• car free days
• investing in cycling infrastructure and pedestrianization
• restricting parking space
• considerable increases in public transport provision
11. WHY?
• Plans and measures are particularly implemented with the
declared aim of reducing greenhouse gas emissions
• Reductions in road traffic is also likely to benefit public
health, both in the short and long-term
• We aimed to scope and review the expected health benefits
13. WHAT WE FOUND – AIR
POLLUTION
• Car traffic contributes to a considerable proportion of air
pollution in cities
• The extent varies depending on factors such as the car fleet
make up, car density, layout
• The range of the traffic contribution to urban PM
concentrations in Europe is from 9-53% for PM10 and 9-66%
for PM2.5 with an average of 39% and 43% at traffic sites
and a higher range for NO2 of over 80%
14. WHAT WE FOUND – AIR
POLLUTION AND NOISE
• Paris nitrogen dioxide dropped by up to 40% in parts of the
city on Sunday 27 September 2015, when cars were banned
• When the Tour de France cycling event came to Leeds, on
the day of the Grand Départ, when cars were banned from
the centre of Leeds and cyclists took over, NO2 levels
dropped by 20%
• Brussels Environment (2015) found a greater than 10 dB
reduction in noise levels on car free Sundays
15. AIR POLLUTION AND
PREMATURE MORTALITY
7% increased risk for premature mortality per 5 ug/m3 PM2.5, Beelen et al 2014
16. NOISE AND
CARDIOVASCULAR
DISEASE
Relative risk of 1.08 (95% confidence interval:
1.04,
1.13) per increase of the weighted day-night noise
level LDN of 10 dB (A)
8% increased risk of cardiovascular disease for a 10 dB (a) increase in noise,
Babisch 2014
28. SOME CONCERNS
• A concern for reducing car traffic in cities is the
reduction in retail sales
• Lawlor (2014) reviewed the effect of the reduction of
cars on impact on existing business performance
(footfall and retail); urban regeneration (new business,
rental income, employment, social exclusion etc.);
improved consumer and business perceptions, and
business diversity
• They found that case study evidence suggests that
well-planned improvements to these public spaces can
boost footfall and trading by up to 40%
29. SOME CONCERNS
• In Barcelona for example
average speeds for trips by
• Car is 23.5
km/hr
• Bike 14 km/hr
• Bus / tram 11.2
km/hr
• Metro / train 25 km/hr
30. CURRENT PARADIGM
Economic Growth
Travel Time Savings
Cost Effectiveness
Land-use
Accessibility
Noise Reductions
Equality
Providing for Cars
Efficiency
Safety Policy
IntegrationConnectivity
Economic Growth
Travel Time Savings
Cost Effectiveness
Land-use
Accessibility
Carbon
Reductions
Noise Reductions
Equality
Providing for Cars
Efficiency
Safety Policy
Integration Connectivity
31. BETTER PARADIGM
Economic Growth
Travel Time Savings
Cost Effectiveness
Land-use
Accessibility
Noise Reductions
Equality
Providing for Cars
Efficiency
Safety Policy
IntegrationConnectivity
Public Health
Travel Time Savings
Cost Effectiveness
Land-use
Accessibility
Carbon
Reductions
Noise Reductions
EqualityProviding for Cars
Efficiency
Safety Policy
Integration Connectivity
35. • Car free cities can have considerable health benefits
• Our cities are too car dominated
• Transport planning and policy too much for the vehicle
and too little for the public and active transport modes
• Decades of planning and investments in car
infrastructure attracted cars to cities --it will take
decades to overturn this
• Large infrastructures for cars are in place and are
underway with relatively small parts of the budget
allocated to and little work done for cyclists and
pedestrians across most regions
• There is an urgent need to rebalance and provide
better, safer infrastructures and policy support for
active/ public transport
• New paradigms needed -- car free cities?