KARISHMA ASHOK
IV/II
ROLL NO 31
CLEANING &
SHAPING
OF ROOT
CANALS…..
INTRODUCTION:
DEFINITIONS
 Cleaning: removal of all potentially pathogenic contents
from root canal
 Shaping: dual action – 3D prgogressive access
- apical prep to permit final obturation instruments &
materials to fit easily
OBJECTIVES
MECHANICAL OBJECTIVES:
1. CONTINUOUS TAPERING
CONICAL SHAPE
2. NARROW APICALLY AND
WIDEST CORONALLY
3. CONCEPT OF FLOW
(MULTIPLE PLANES)
4. APICAL FORAMEN AS
NARROW AS POSSIBLE
5. AVOID TRANSPOTATION
OF APICAL FORAMEN
BIOLOGICAL OBJECTIVES:
 CONFINEMENT OF INSTRUMENT TO THE ROOTS
 NECROTIC DEBRIS NOT FORCED PERIAPICALLY
 COMPLETE REMOVAL OF TISSUE FROM THE
CANAL SPACE
 CREATION OF SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR
OBTURATING MATERIAL
CLINICAL OBJECTIVES
Removal of overlying dentin straight line
access
Hermetic seal in obturation
Permanent restoration form function &
aesthetics
ANATOMICAL CONSIDERATION
PRINCIPLES OF CANAL INSTRUMENTATION
 STRAIGHT LINE ACCESS
PRECURVING
RETAINING ITS ORIGINAL FORM & SHAPE
IRRIGATION
RESTRICTING INSTRUMENTS WITHIN THE CANAL
RECAPITULATION
REMOVAL OF DENTINAL DEBRIS
PHASES IN SHAPING OF ROOT CANAL
I. NEGOTIATION (PATENCY FILING)
II. CORONAL PRE-ENLARGEMENT
III. WORKING LENGTH DETERMINATION
IV. SHAPING TECHNIQUES
V. WORKING WIDTH
PATENCY FILING
 PRECURVED ISO SIZE 10 FILE / STAINLESS K FILE
REAMING MOTION
IN CALCIFIED CANALS OR WITH OBSTRUCTIONS, ISO SIZE 8
FILE OR SIZE 6 K FILE
CREATING A PATH PASSIVELY TO THE APICAL FORAMEN
HELPS IN MAINTAINING A CONTINUOUS & CLEAR PATH BY
REMOVING DEBRIS ESP. WHEN COMBINED WITH
IRRIGATION
CORONAL PRE-ENLARGEMENT
 ADVANTAGES:
REDUCED POTENTIAL OF EXCRUCIATING DEBRIS
BEYOND APEX
APICAL GAUGING MORE ACCURATE
PREVENTS PREMATURE BINDING OF
INSTRUMENTS TO CANAL WALLS
BETTER IRRIGATION
3-4 MM INTO CANAL SPACE
ORIFICE ENLARGERS (NI-TI SYSTEM/ GG DRILLS)
MOVEMENTS IN BMP
FILING
WATCH WINDING
TECHNIQUES
STEP BACK TECHNIQUE CROWN DOWN TECHNIQUE
CONVENTIONAL PRESSURELESS
PASSIVE DOUBLE FLARE
BALANCED FORCE
HYBRID TECHNIQUE
STEP BACK TECHNIQUE
 No 10 & No 15 FILE INSERTED TILL WORKING
LENGTH; USE IN REAMING MOTION
 APICAL ENLARGEMENT TO DEVELOP APICAL STOP
ATLEAST 3 SIZES (25 FILE SIZE)
 INCREAZE FILE SIZE PROGRESSIVELY & WORKING
SHORT BY 1 MM
 RECAPITULATION
 AFTER PREPARING THE BODY OF CANAL, NOS 2 & 3
GATES GLIDEN DRILLS ARE USED FOR CORONAL
PREPARATION
 CIRCUMFERENTIAL FILING USING MAF
CROWN DOWN TECHNIQUE
 CORONAL FLARING WITH GG DRILLS NO 2 OR 3
WITH EACH FILE BEING SEQUENTIALLY SHORTER
A LARGE FILE (SIZE 60) IS PLACED IN CORONAL
ASPECT & CANAL IS INSTRUMENTED IN WATCH
WINDING MOTION
SEQUENTIALLY SMALLER FILES TILL WORKING
LENGTH
APICAL ENLARGEMENT WITH MAF
FINAL TAPER WITH CIRCUMFERRENTIAL FILING
Step back crown down hybrid
HYBRID TECHNIQUE
Advancements
ULTRASONIC INSTRUMENTS
Richman
Cavitation & acoustic streaming
File movement 20,000-25,000 vibrations/second
Sodium hypochlorite – irrigation
Disadvg: over instrumentation
transportation of foramen
Cleaning & shaping
Step back technique
Filing & reaming motion
Sodium hypochlorite
irrigation
Apical enlargement- 3 sizes
beyond the first instrument
size used
Enlarge canal until healthy
dentine appears
Shaping & cleaning
Crown down tecnique
Balanced force movements
Chlorhexidine irrigation
EDTA for removal of smear
layer
Apical enlargement- as small
as possible
Depends upon-
o periapical pathology
o pulp-vital/infected/calcified
TRADITIONAL CONCEPT CURRENT CONCEPT
Biomechanical preparation in endodontics
Biomechanical preparation in endodontics

Biomechanical preparation in endodontics

  • 1.
    KARISHMA ASHOK IV/II ROLL NO31 CLEANING & SHAPING OF ROOT CANALS…..
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION: DEFINITIONS  Cleaning: removalof all potentially pathogenic contents from root canal  Shaping: dual action – 3D prgogressive access - apical prep to permit final obturation instruments & materials to fit easily OBJECTIVES
  • 3.
    MECHANICAL OBJECTIVES: 1. CONTINUOUSTAPERING CONICAL SHAPE 2. NARROW APICALLY AND WIDEST CORONALLY 3. CONCEPT OF FLOW (MULTIPLE PLANES) 4. APICAL FORAMEN AS NARROW AS POSSIBLE 5. AVOID TRANSPOTATION OF APICAL FORAMEN
  • 4.
    BIOLOGICAL OBJECTIVES:  CONFINEMENTOF INSTRUMENT TO THE ROOTS  NECROTIC DEBRIS NOT FORCED PERIAPICALLY  COMPLETE REMOVAL OF TISSUE FROM THE CANAL SPACE  CREATION OF SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR OBTURATING MATERIAL
  • 5.
    CLINICAL OBJECTIVES Removal ofoverlying dentin straight line access Hermetic seal in obturation Permanent restoration form function & aesthetics
  • 6.
  • 7.
    PRINCIPLES OF CANALINSTRUMENTATION  STRAIGHT LINE ACCESS PRECURVING RETAINING ITS ORIGINAL FORM & SHAPE IRRIGATION RESTRICTING INSTRUMENTS WITHIN THE CANAL RECAPITULATION REMOVAL OF DENTINAL DEBRIS
  • 8.
    PHASES IN SHAPINGOF ROOT CANAL I. NEGOTIATION (PATENCY FILING) II. CORONAL PRE-ENLARGEMENT III. WORKING LENGTH DETERMINATION IV. SHAPING TECHNIQUES V. WORKING WIDTH
  • 9.
    PATENCY FILING  PRECURVEDISO SIZE 10 FILE / STAINLESS K FILE REAMING MOTION IN CALCIFIED CANALS OR WITH OBSTRUCTIONS, ISO SIZE 8 FILE OR SIZE 6 K FILE CREATING A PATH PASSIVELY TO THE APICAL FORAMEN HELPS IN MAINTAINING A CONTINUOUS & CLEAR PATH BY REMOVING DEBRIS ESP. WHEN COMBINED WITH IRRIGATION
  • 10.
    CORONAL PRE-ENLARGEMENT  ADVANTAGES: REDUCEDPOTENTIAL OF EXCRUCIATING DEBRIS BEYOND APEX APICAL GAUGING MORE ACCURATE PREVENTS PREMATURE BINDING OF INSTRUMENTS TO CANAL WALLS BETTER IRRIGATION 3-4 MM INTO CANAL SPACE ORIFICE ENLARGERS (NI-TI SYSTEM/ GG DRILLS)
  • 11.
  • 13.
    TECHNIQUES STEP BACK TECHNIQUECROWN DOWN TECHNIQUE CONVENTIONAL PRESSURELESS PASSIVE DOUBLE FLARE BALANCED FORCE HYBRID TECHNIQUE
  • 14.
    STEP BACK TECHNIQUE No 10 & No 15 FILE INSERTED TILL WORKING LENGTH; USE IN REAMING MOTION  APICAL ENLARGEMENT TO DEVELOP APICAL STOP ATLEAST 3 SIZES (25 FILE SIZE)  INCREAZE FILE SIZE PROGRESSIVELY & WORKING SHORT BY 1 MM  RECAPITULATION  AFTER PREPARING THE BODY OF CANAL, NOS 2 & 3 GATES GLIDEN DRILLS ARE USED FOR CORONAL PREPARATION  CIRCUMFERENTIAL FILING USING MAF
  • 16.
    CROWN DOWN TECHNIQUE CORONAL FLARING WITH GG DRILLS NO 2 OR 3 WITH EACH FILE BEING SEQUENTIALLY SHORTER A LARGE FILE (SIZE 60) IS PLACED IN CORONAL ASPECT & CANAL IS INSTRUMENTED IN WATCH WINDING MOTION SEQUENTIALLY SMALLER FILES TILL WORKING LENGTH APICAL ENLARGEMENT WITH MAF FINAL TAPER WITH CIRCUMFERRENTIAL FILING
  • 18.
    Step back crowndown hybrid
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
    ULTRASONIC INSTRUMENTS Richman Cavitation &acoustic streaming File movement 20,000-25,000 vibrations/second Sodium hypochlorite – irrigation Disadvg: over instrumentation transportation of foramen
  • 22.
    Cleaning & shaping Stepback technique Filing & reaming motion Sodium hypochlorite irrigation Apical enlargement- 3 sizes beyond the first instrument size used Enlarge canal until healthy dentine appears Shaping & cleaning Crown down tecnique Balanced force movements Chlorhexidine irrigation EDTA for removal of smear layer Apical enlargement- as small as possible Depends upon- o periapical pathology o pulp-vital/infected/calcified TRADITIONAL CONCEPT CURRENT CONCEPT