SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Schlumberger
Private
Basic Casing Design and
Casing Point Selection
UTC Instructor
Schlumberger
Private
Objectives
On completion of this module the engineer should
be able to…
• Define the different types of casings.
• Describe the casing point selection process
• Describe the maximum load casing design
method.
• Demonstrate the bottom up method of casing
setting depth initial estimation.
Schlumberger
Private
3 UTC Instructor
Introduction
• Design Considerations
• Cost, (usually up to 17% of the total well cost)
• Bottomhole Pressure
• Service Conditions (casing handling)
• Material Properties
• Internal Yield
• Collapse
• Tension
Schlumberger
Private
Statement of Standard
All casing and tubing shall be designed to
withstand all loads that can be imposed on them
during installation and the lifetime of the well.
No well construction program shall be
commenced without an approved casing and
tubing design.
Schlumberger
Private
5 UTC Instructor
Mechanical Properties Of Steel
• API Standards
– Specification; API, 5A.
– Bulletins; 5C2, properties of casing, tubing, drill pipe.
– Recommended; API. RP7G, care and use of tubular.
• H2S & CO2
• Exposure to more than 0.05 psia of H2S pressure
and CO2 corrosion can lead to failure,
– Common practice is the use chromium alloy (casing type
L80 or Stainless steel)
Schlumberger
Private
Types of Casing Strings
• Conductor
• Surface
• Intermediate
• Drilling Liner
• Production
Schlumberger
Private
Types of Casing Strings
Conductor Casing
 Purpose
1. Provides mud returns to tanks.
2. Divert flow in case of emergency.
3. Support subsequent casing loads.
 Installation
1. Driven
2. Jetted
3. Drilled and cemented
Schlumberger
Private
Types of Casing Strings
Surface Casing
 Purpose
1. Protect Fresh water aquifers.
2. Provide wellbore integrity,
- Provides a BOP seal
- Allows drilling into abnormal pressure safely by
isolating shallow hazards.
Definition: Casing set at or above 6500’ or in sub-normal
pressure.
Setting depth is based on mechanical and regulatory
considerations
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Point Selection Criteria
Mechanical Considerations
• Ability of the weakest exposed formation beneath the
casing (usually shoe FG) to withstand the load imposed
by well control operation.
• Likelihood of differential sticking occurring while running
casing.
Schlumberger
Private
Types of Casing Strings
Intermediate Casing
 Purpose
1. Provide mechanical integrity.
- Case off problem zones.
- Allows higher blowout protection as it is set in more
competent formations than surface casing (higher shoe
strength)
Definition: Casing set to 6500’ or deeper in abnormal pressure.
Setting depth is based on mechanical considerations
Schlumberger
Private
Types of Casing Strings
Drilling Liners
 Purpose
1. Provide mechanical integrity as intermediate casing but at
lower cost.
Definition: Partial string of casing hung in previously set
casing string and is set to a depth greater than 6500’ or in
abnormal pressure.
Setting Depth is based on mechanical considerations
Schlumberger
Private
Types of Casing Strings
Production Casing/Liners
 Purpose
1. Provide isolation of the producing zone from other zones.
2. Withstand the anticipated loads during production and
testing operations for the wells life time.
Setting Depth is the last string across the production zone.
This may be a casing to surface or a liner that is hung.
Schlumberger
Private
13 UTC Instructor
Casing Point Selection
• Why is Casing set in the Hole?
• Casing is set for two Drilling reasons;
• To consolidate the hole already drilled, (steel filter cake)
• To provide the pressure control integrity to drill ahead.
Schlumberger
Private
14 UTC Instructor
Criteria For Selecting Casing
Depths
Each casing string is run as deep as possible based
on kick tolerance, unless other reasons dictate it
to be run higher.
Schlumberger
Private
15 UTC Instructor
Other Restrictions On Casing
Shoe Depth
• Wellbore Stability
Within the limit allowed by kick tolerance, we may restrict
the length of OH sections, to minimize deterioration of
wellbore with time
• Mud Requirements
Formations may affect casing depth (reactive shale)
• Directional Requirements.
Directional Problems may alter casing points (drag, torque)
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Point Selection Criteria
Other factors affecting casing setting depth.
1. Underground fresh water zones
2. Shallow hazards
3. Directional profile
4. Sidetrack requirement
5. ECD at shoe
Schlumberger
Private
17 UTC Instructor
Special Criteria for Conductor
The Conductor pipe needs to be set deep enough
to carry
subsequent axial loads from all other casing strings.
• It also must withstand the bending loads from
environmental conditions.
Schlumberger
Private
18 UTC Instructor
Special Criteria for Surface Casing
The Surface Casing is usually set in the first
competent
formation which is strong enough to close in on a
kick.
Schlumberger
Private
19 UTC Instructor
Special Criteria for Intermediate
Casing
The Intermediate Casing is set as deep as possible
to
allow sufficient shoe strength for drilling ahead.
Schlumberger
Private
20 UTC Instructor
Intermediate Casing - other
considerations
Intermediate casing may also be set for directional
or wellbore stability reasons
• Reduce torques and drags in an extended reach
hole.
• Case off possible differential sticking zones and
perform directional work below casing.
• Case off some problem zones prior to drilling
ahead.
Schlumberger
Private
21 UTC Instructor
Special Criteria for Production
Casing
The Production Casing is set through or just above
the
reservoir, depending on the type of completion to
be
used.
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Point Selection Criteria
Information gathered prior to casing design.
• Estimated pore pressure and rock strength using offset
data.
• The minimum and maximum casing sizes to be run at TD
that would allow for logging testing and a completion
program.
• The effects of geological uncertainties on casing setting
depths and the ability to safely circulate out the maximum
anticipated kick volume
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Point Selection Criteria
After gathering Information
• Develop a pore pressure and fracture gradient versus
depth plot.
• Plan the well from TD up.
- Determine the maximum formation pressure at TD.
- Add a Trip margin and determine minimum weight at TD.
Schlumberger
Private
Bottom Up Method
• Plot the pore pressure gradient curve
• Plot the Mud weight curve. The mud weight should
balance the highest PP in the OH with a TM of 0.5 ppg.
• Plot the estimated actual FG curve, and the designed FG
curve, which is FG less allowance for Well control, surge
or ECD.
• Start on the bottom on the mud weight curve and draw a
vertical line up to the designed FG curve. This is the initial
estimated production casing or liner.
• Cont…..
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Point Selection Criteria
Schlumberger
Private
26 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
Schlumberger
Private
27 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
Kick tolerance is the maximum
volume gas kick which can be
safely circulated out without
causing formation failure at the
weakest point of the open hole
(usually deemed to be the
casing shoe).
(SICP)
(SIDPP)
Schlumberger
Private
28 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
.
Kick tolerance is a measure of the size of
a gas kick that can be handled.
The following assumptions are made…
 A gas influx comes from TD up to the casing point or stays at TD.
The kicking formation has a pore pressure equal to or greater than
the mud hydrostatic.
 Shut in casing pressure (SICP) = MAASP when the top of gas is at
the casing shoe, using the drillers method.
 Based on these assumptions, we calculate the volume of a gas kick.
This is the maximum size of gas influx, which is what we call KICK
TOLERANCE
Schlumberger
Private
29 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
More assumptions
 For an Exploration or Appraisal well, we can assume that
the kicking formation may have a pore pressure gradient of
10% higher than the mud gradient.
 i.e. A planned mud gradient of 0.5 psi/ft will assume a pore
pressure gradient at the kick depth of 0.55 psi/ft.
 For a development well in a known area, assume that the
kicking formation may have a pore pressure which is equal
to the mud gradient.
 In this case any kick taken will be a swabbed kick.
Schlumberger
Private
30 UTC Instructor
The Well as a ‘U’-Tube - Static
The Pressure at Point 1 = Pressure at Point 2
P1 = BHP = SIDPP + HPDS
P2 = BHP = SICP + HPA
P1
Schlumberger
Private
31 UTC Instructor
The Well as a ‘U’-Tube - Static
Therefore: P1 = P2
SIDPP@surf + HPDS = SICP@surf + HPA =>
SIDPP@surf = SICP@surf - HPDS + HPA =>
SIDPP@surf = MAASP@surf – MgxTVDTD +(TVDTD – Hi)Mg + GgxHi
1st Step: Determine what the maximum height of influx can be when it
reaches the casing shoe*.
*Assumed that weakest formation is at the shoe
g
g
@surf
@surf
i
G
M
SIDPP
MAASP
H



Schlumberger
Private
32 UTC Instructor
The Well as a ‘U’-Tube - Static
• To find MAASP@surf & SIDPP @surf:
– P@Shoe = MAASP@surf + Mg x TVDshoe = >
MAASP@surf = P@Shoe - Mg x TVDshoe
– P@TD = SIDPP @Surf + Mg x TVDTD = >
SIDPP @Surf = P@TD - Mg x TVDTD
Schlumberger
Private
33 UTC Instructor
The Well as a ‘U’-Tube - Static
• Where:
When kick at the shoe : P@Shoe = MAASP @ shoe = Fg x
TVDshoe
When kick is at TD: P@TD = SIDPP@TD = {Mg+(10%Mg)} x
TVD TD Kick Gradient
Schlumberger
Private
34 UTC Instructor
Hydrostatic Pressure
Hydrostatic Pressure
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Pressure (psi)
TVD
(psi)
Hydrostatic Pressure
Schlumberger
Private
35 UTC Instructor
Hydrostatic Pressure & SIDPP
SIDPP
SIDPP@surf
Hydrostatic Pressure
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Pressure (psi)
TVD
(psi)
SIDPP
Hydrostatic Pressure
Schlumberger
Private
36 UTC Instructor
Hydrostatic Pressure & SIDPP &
MAASP
MAASP@surf
MAASP
SIDPP
SIDPP@surf
Hydrostatic Pressure
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Pressure (psi)
TVD
(psi)
MAASP
SIDPP
Hydrostatic Pressure
Schlumberger
Private
37 UTC Instructor
Hydrostatic Pressure & SIDPP &
MAASP
MAASP@Shoe
MAASP@surf
SIDPP@surf
SIDPP@TD
Mud Hydrostatic Pressure
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Pressure (psi)
TVD
(psi)
MAASP
SIDPP
Hydrostatic Pressure
MAASP@Surf = MAASP@Shoe - Hydro. P@Shoe
SIDPP@Surf = SIDPP@TD - Hydro. P@TD
Schlumberger
Private
38 UTC Instructor
MAASP@Shoe
MAASP@surf
MAASP
SIDPP
Hydrostatic Pressure
MAASP@Surf = MAASP@Shoe - Hydro. P@Shoe
Schlumberger
Private
39 UTC Instructor
Kick tolerance
2nd Step: The height of influx represents a volume:
V@shoe = Hi@shoe x Annular Capacity@shoe
So this is the influx volume which will cause the
pressure at the shoe to reach the maximum
allowable value when the kick reaches the shoe.
Schlumberger
Private
40 UTC Instructor
Kick tolerance
• However, we also have to consider the possibility
that the pressure at the shoe can reach the
Maximum allowable value when the kick enters
the wellbore!!!
• Therefore, we have to calculate the second kick
tolerance at TD.
Schlumberger
Private
41 UTC Instructor
Annular Gas Expansion
• Pressure reduces in gas as depth of
gas in well decreases.
• Gas expands as it rises and
pressure is reduced (Boyle’s Law).
• Gas height increases, mud height
decreases.
So: P1V1 = P2V2
Schlumberger
Private
42 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
3rd Step: Therefore, we can calculate V@TD & the
height of the influx at TD at that V@TD :
P@Shoe x V@Shoe = P@TD x V@TD
And
@TD
@TD
@TD
Capacity
Annular
V
H 
@TD
@Shoe
@Shoe
@TD
P
V
x
P
V 
Schlumberger
Private
43 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
The final kick tolerance is determined by which
of either of the two kick tolerances is the
smallest:
 If V@Shoe> V@TD , and if H@shoe >H@TD,then V@TD
is the kick tolerance
 If V@Shoe> V@TD , and if H@shoe < H@TD,then
recalculate V@TD for critical height H@Shoe at TD.
 If V@Shoe< V@TD, then we need to calculate a new
volume using the critical height (H@Shoe) as if it
were around the BHA and DS.
Schlumberger
Private
44 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance Rule of Thumb
• If MAASP psi  target Vertical Depth in feet < 0.1,
kick tolerance is going to be low.
• If MAASP psi  target Vertical Depth in feet > 0.1,
kick tolerance is probably going to be OK.
Schlumberger
Private
45 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
Example 1:
Calculate the Kick Tolerance for the following scenario.
Casing shoe at 6000’ with a FG of 0.72 psi/ft, plan to drill to
the next casing point at 8500’ with a mud gradient of 0.62
psi/ft in a vertical exploration well. (Kick gradient 10%more
than mud gradient.)
Assume a gas gradient of 0.12 psi/ft at the casing shoe,
and 12 ¼” hole with 5” DP and 300’ of 8” drill collars.
Schlumberger
Private
48 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
Example2:
Calculate the Kick Tolerance for the following scenario.
Casing shoe at 5000’ with a FG of 0.65 psi/ft, plan to drill to
the next casing point at 7500’ with a mud gradient of 0.55
psi/ft in a vertical exploration well. (Kick gradient 10%more
than mud gradient.)
Assume a gas gradient of 0.12 psi/ft at the casing shoe,
and 12 ¼” hole with 5 7/8” DP and 300’ of 8” drill collars.
Schlumberger
Private
Maximum Load casing
Design
• This is a method for selecting specific casing based on
operational conditions and resulting stresses.
• Concept: Design for most severe realistic load to minimize
risk of failure.
• Maximum load cases are based on geographical region,
geologic section and organizational philosophy.
Schlumberger
Private
Maximum Load casing
Design
• Design Cases:
– Burst
– Collapse
– Tension
– Special considerations:
– H2S/CO2, Temperature, Multi-axial stress correction,
Stability.
Schlumberger
Private
Steps for Basic Casing
Design
Develop Maximum
Load case condition
for burst
Calculate resulting
loads, (Design Line)
Select casing strings
with load capacity
>/= Load line
Burst Design Collapse Design
Develop Maximum
Load case condition
for Collapse
For casing selected
in burst design,
check that load
capacity >/= Load
line
Develop Maximum
Load case condition
for Tension
Tension Design
Calculate resulting
loads, (Design Line)
Calculate resulting
loads, (Design Line)
Multiply design line
by safety factor,
(Load Line)
Multiply design line
by safety factor,
(Load Line)
Multiply design line
by safety factor,
(Load Line)
For casing selected
in collapse design,
check that load
capacity >/= Load
line
Schlumberger
Private
52 UTC Instructor
Minimum Design Factors
DESIGN LOADS Surface & intermediate
casings, drilling liners
Production
casings/ liners
Tubing
Collapse 1.0 1.1 1.125
Burst
- normal service
- critical service
1.1
1.25
1.1
1.25
1.1
1.25
Tension
pipe body
connection
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.3
1.3
Compression 1.3 1.3 1.3
Triaxial 1.25 1.25 1.25
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Burst Design
Maximum pressure at casing shoe,dependent on FG. (Internal Pre
s
fg
inj D
SF
EMW
P )
(
052
.
0 

The maximum internal burst loading pressure at
surface is a function of the injection pressure, and is
given as:
s
g
shoe
inj
isurf D
G
P
P 
 @
Load Line
External pressure due to annular drilling fluid….0.465psi/ft
D
G
P f
e 
Worst case scenario is gas filled above FG+SF
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Burst Design
Pressure with burst design factor of 1.1
Design Line
)
( @
@ e
shoe
inj
shoe
br P
P
P 

@ shoe
@ surface )
( e
isurf
brsurf P
P
P 

@ shoe
@ surface
b
br
b DF
P
P 
b
brsurf
bsurf DF
P
P 
From the casing Tables choose appropriate casing
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Collapse Design
Load Line
Worst case scenario is full evacuation with Mud on the outside
D
P m
e )
(
052
.
0 

Maximum collapse pressure at shoe, (external pressure)
The casing is empty and open to atmospheric
pressure. This will render the surface pressure to be 0
psi
Design Line
1
.
1
)
( e
C P
P 
From the casing Tables check casing collapse rating
Schlumberger
Private
Casing Tension Design
Worst case scenario is stuck casing with an over pull 100,000 lbs a
As per SLB casing manual, TVD should be used for gravity relate
Tensile load calculation. If Biaxial stress calculations are not bein
made then a safety factor of 1.6 shall be used.
Load Line
lbs
wL
F TVD
wt 000
,
100


Design Line
SF
F
F wt
wtd )
(

From the casing Tables check casing tensile rating
Tensile load will change if pumps are on while pulling on casing
Schlumberger
Private
57 UTC Instructor
Casing Sizes Decision Tree
Tubing size, in
Casing & liners
size, in
Bit & hole
size, in
Casing size, in
Casing & liners
size, in
Bit & hole
size, in
Casing & liners
size, in
Bit & hole
size, in
Casing size, in
Bit & hole
size, in
16
14-3/4
11-3/4
11-7/8
10-5/8
8-5/8
7-7/8
5-1/2
5-3/4
4-1/2
3-1/2
1.9
20
17-1/2
13-3/8
14
12-1/4
8-3/4
6-1/8
4-1/2
2-3/8
10-3/4
9-1/2
7-5/8
7-3/4
6-1/2
5
24
20
16
14-3/4
11-3/4
11-7/8
10-5/8
8-5/8
7-7/8
5-1/2
2-7/8
30
26
20
17-1/2
13-3/8
14
12-1/4
9-5/8
8-1/2
8-3/4
7
3-1/2
18-5/8
9-5/8
9-7/8
8-1/2
7
5-7/8
6-5/8
4-3/4
4
2-1/16
Schlumberger
Private
58 UTC Instructor
API CASING SPECIFICATIONS
• API Specifications (5A, 5AC and 5AX)
• Weight of Casing
• Nominal Weight Expressed in lb/ft or kg/mt ( Weight of CSG plus tool joint ).
• Plain End Weight Expressed in lb/ft or kg/mt ( Weight of CSG w/out tool joint) .
• Length of Casing
Range Length (ft) Average length (ft)
1 16 -25 22
2 25 -34 31
3 Over 34 42
Schlumberger
Private
59 UTC Instructor
API CASING SPECIFICATIONS
• Colour Grade Identifications
Schlumberger
Private
60 UTC Instructor
Schlumberger
Private
61 UTC Instructor
Maximum Load Case - Example
• Scenario for burst- Gas filled at shoe fracture pressure and normal
pressure gradient outside.
• Scenario for collapse- Total evacuation, drilling mud in the annulus.
• Scenario for tension- no biaxial and triaxial calculations applied.
Exploration Well
9 5/8" Casing 47 ppf N-80 setting depth 9500' TVD
Mud weight casing will be set in is 12.5 ppg
Normal pressure gradient is 0.465 psi/ft
Gas gradient is 0.12 psi/ft
Fracture gradient at shoe 16 ppg
Burst design factor 1.1
Collapse design factor 1.0
Tension design factor 1.6
Schlumberger
Private
62 UTC Instructor
Maximum Load Case – Example 2
• Scenario for burst- Gas filled at shoe fracture pressure and normal
pressure gradient outside.
• Scenario for collapse- Total evacuation, drilling mud in the annulus.
• Scenario for tension- No biaxial and triaxial calculations applied.
Development well
-13 3/8" Casing /Setting depth 5000' MD/3500’TVD
-Mud weight casing will be set in is 10 ppg
-Normal pressure gradient is 0.465 psi/ft
-Gas gradient is 0.12 psi/ft
-Fracture gradient at shoe 14.5 ppg
-Burst design factor 1.1
-Collapse design factor 1.0
-Tension design factor 1.6
Schlumberger
Private
63 UTC Instructor
Kick Tolerance
Example:
Calculate the Kick Tolerance for the following scenario.
Casing shoe at 3500’ with a FG of 0.72 psi/ft, plan to drill to
the next casing point at 8500’ with a mud gradient of 0.56
psi/ft in a vertical exploration well. (Kick gradient 10%more
than mud gradient.)
Assume a gas gradient of 0.12 psi/ft at the casing shoe,
and 12 ¼” hole with 5 1/2” DP and 300’ of 8 1/4” drill
collars.

More Related Content

What's hot

Directional Drilling 2020-2021.pdf
Directional Drilling 2020-2021.pdfDirectional Drilling 2020-2021.pdf
Directional Drilling 2020-2021.pdf
ssuserd324d9
 
Blow out preventer (bop)
Blow out preventer (bop)Blow out preventer (bop)
Blow out preventer (bop)
danperth
 
Q922+de1+l04 v1
Q922+de1+l04 v1Q922+de1+l04 v1
Q922+de1+l04 v1
AFATous
 

What's hot (20)

Drilling Problems.pdf
Drilling Problems.pdfDrilling Problems.pdf
Drilling Problems.pdf
 
Directional Drilling 2020-2021.pdf
Directional Drilling 2020-2021.pdfDirectional Drilling 2020-2021.pdf
Directional Drilling 2020-2021.pdf
 
Scsssv surface control subsurface safety valve
Scsssv surface control subsurface safety valveScsssv surface control subsurface safety valve
Scsssv surface control subsurface safety valve
 
Presentation 6 casing design
Presentation 6 casing designPresentation 6 casing design
Presentation 6 casing design
 
Blow out preventer (bop)
Blow out preventer (bop)Blow out preventer (bop)
Blow out preventer (bop)
 
Jars
JarsJars
Jars
 
Q922+de1+l04 v1
Q922+de1+l04 v1Q922+de1+l04 v1
Q922+de1+l04 v1
 
Wellheads Training .pdf
Wellheads Training .pdfWellheads Training .pdf
Wellheads Training .pdf
 
Casing Design | Tubing | Well Control | Drilling | Gaurav Singh Rajput
Casing Design | Tubing | Well Control | Drilling | Gaurav Singh RajputCasing Design | Tubing | Well Control | Drilling | Gaurav Singh Rajput
Casing Design | Tubing | Well Control | Drilling | Gaurav Singh Rajput
 
Drilling problems and optimization
Drilling problems and optimizationDrilling problems and optimization
Drilling problems and optimization
 
blow out preventer system
blow out preventer systemblow out preventer system
blow out preventer system
 
Packers GFK
Packers GFKPackers GFK
Packers GFK
 
Problems during Drilling a Well
Problems during Drilling a WellProblems during Drilling a Well
Problems during Drilling a Well
 
Ssd spm
Ssd   spmSsd   spm
Ssd spm
 
Basic Well Control
Basic Well ControlBasic Well Control
Basic Well Control
 
introduction to completions and workovers (2)
introduction to completions and workovers (2)introduction to completions and workovers (2)
introduction to completions and workovers (2)
 
Casing
CasingCasing
Casing
 
Wen_Design.ppt
Wen_Design.pptWen_Design.ppt
Wen_Design.ppt
 
Well completion equipment 2. landing nipples
Well completion equipment  2. landing nipplesWell completion equipment  2. landing nipples
Well completion equipment 2. landing nipples
 
Well completion fundamentals
Well completion fundamentalsWell completion fundamentals
Well completion fundamentals
 

Similar to Basic Casing Design and Casing Point Selection.ppt

Q922+de2+l06 v1
Q922+de2+l06 v1Q922+de2+l06 v1
Q922+de2+l06 v1
AFATous
 
Best practices day 4 am new
Best practices day 4 am newBest practices day 4 am new
Best practices day 4 am new
Ahmed Radwan
 
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
AFATous
 
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
AFATous
 

Similar to Basic Casing Design and Casing Point Selection.ppt (20)

Casing_Design(1).ppt
Casing_Design(1).pptCasing_Design(1).ppt
Casing_Design(1).ppt
 
Wellhead and christmas tree components, functions and more
Wellhead and christmas tree components, functions and moreWellhead and christmas tree components, functions and more
Wellhead and christmas tree components, functions and more
 
wellheads-170105153648 (1).pdf
wellheads-170105153648 (1).pdfwellheads-170105153648 (1).pdf
wellheads-170105153648 (1).pdf
 
Sequence of well completion part 1
Sequence of well completion part 1Sequence of well completion part 1
Sequence of well completion part 1
 
Sequence of well completion part 1
Sequence of well completion part 1Sequence of well completion part 1
Sequence of well completion part 1
 
Q922+de2+l06 v1
Q922+de2+l06 v1Q922+de2+l06 v1
Q922+de2+l06 v1
 
The Completion String & Accessories.pdf
The Completion String & Accessories.pdfThe Completion String & Accessories.pdf
The Completion String & Accessories.pdf
 
IS MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING (MPD) ALWAYS THE CURE?
IS MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING (MPD) ALWAYS THE CURE?IS MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING (MPD) ALWAYS THE CURE?
IS MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING (MPD) ALWAYS THE CURE?
 
Formation Evaluation project (drill stem test DST)
Formation Evaluation project (drill stem test DST)Formation Evaluation project (drill stem test DST)
Formation Evaluation project (drill stem test DST)
 
Best practices day 4 am new
Best practices day 4 am newBest practices day 4 am new
Best practices day 4 am new
 
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
 
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
Q921 de2 lec6 uc v1
 
publication_1580218342.pdf
publication_1580218342.pdfpublication_1580218342.pdf
publication_1580218342.pdf
 
4. Mechanical design of pressure vessels_slides.pdf
4. Mechanical design of pressure vessels_slides.pdf4. Mechanical design of pressure vessels_slides.pdf
4. Mechanical design of pressure vessels_slides.pdf
 
Analyzing Multi-zone completion using multilayer by IPR (PROSPER)
Analyzing Multi-zone completion using multilayer by IPR (PROSPER)  Analyzing Multi-zone completion using multilayer by IPR (PROSPER)
Analyzing Multi-zone completion using multilayer by IPR (PROSPER)
 
Drilling Mannual
Drilling MannualDrilling Mannual
Drilling Mannual
 
343312365 mt-ppt
343312365 mt-ppt343312365 mt-ppt
343312365 mt-ppt
 
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)
PENNGLEN FIELD Development Plan (GULF of MEXICO)
 
3440551.ppt
3440551.ppt3440551.ppt
3440551.ppt
 
Petroleum drilling fundamentals
Petroleum drilling fundamentalsPetroleum drilling fundamentals
Petroleum drilling fundamentals
 

More from aminpeyvand

More from aminpeyvand (7)

6. Equipments 1400.11.pdf
6. Equipments 1400.11.pdf6. Equipments 1400.11.pdf
6. Equipments 1400.11.pdf
 
4. Kick Detection 1400.11.pdf
4. Kick Detection 1400.11.pdf4. Kick Detection 1400.11.pdf
4. Kick Detection 1400.11.pdf
 
2. Basic Knowledge part 1 1400.11.pdf
2. Basic Knowledge part 1 1400.11.pdf2. Basic Knowledge part 1 1400.11.pdf
2. Basic Knowledge part 1 1400.11.pdf
 
5. Killing Methods 1400.11.pdf
5. Killing Methods 1400.11.pdf5. Killing Methods 1400.11.pdf
5. Killing Methods 1400.11.pdf
 
1. IWCF L34 Introduction 1400.11.pdf
1. IWCF L34 Introduction 1400.11.pdf1. IWCF L34 Introduction 1400.11.pdf
1. IWCF L34 Introduction 1400.11.pdf
 
3. Basic Knowledge part 2 1400.11.pdf
3. Basic Knowledge part 2 1400.11.pdf3. Basic Knowledge part 2 1400.11.pdf
3. Basic Knowledge part 2 1400.11.pdf
 
TDAS 615 Tubing Design pitfalls 2005.ppt
TDAS 615 Tubing Design pitfalls 2005.pptTDAS 615 Tubing Design pitfalls 2005.ppt
TDAS 615 Tubing Design pitfalls 2005.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

Digital Signal Processing Lecture notes n.pdf
Digital Signal Processing Lecture notes n.pdfDigital Signal Processing Lecture notes n.pdf
Digital Signal Processing Lecture notes n.pdf
AbrahamGadissa
 
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptxpower quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
ViniHema
 
Hall booking system project report .pdf
Hall booking system project report  .pdfHall booking system project report  .pdf
Hall booking system project report .pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxCFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
R&R Consult
 
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdfAutomobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 

Recently uploaded (20)

ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES INTRODUCTION UNIT-I
ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES  INTRODUCTION UNIT-IENERGY STORAGE DEVICES  INTRODUCTION UNIT-I
ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES INTRODUCTION UNIT-I
 
HYDROPOWER - Hydroelectric power generation
HYDROPOWER - Hydroelectric power generationHYDROPOWER - Hydroelectric power generation
HYDROPOWER - Hydroelectric power generation
 
Natalia Rutkowska - BIM School Course in Kraków
Natalia Rutkowska - BIM School Course in KrakówNatalia Rutkowska - BIM School Course in Kraków
Natalia Rutkowska - BIM School Course in Kraków
 
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdfThe Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair.pdf
 
Arduino based vehicle speed tracker project
Arduino based vehicle speed tracker projectArduino based vehicle speed tracker project
Arduino based vehicle speed tracker project
 
Water Industry Process Automation and Control Monthly - May 2024.pdf
Water Industry Process Automation and Control Monthly - May 2024.pdfWater Industry Process Automation and Control Monthly - May 2024.pdf
Water Industry Process Automation and Control Monthly - May 2024.pdf
 
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary AttacksImmunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
 
İTÜ CAD and Reverse Engineering Workshop
İTÜ CAD and Reverse Engineering WorkshopİTÜ CAD and Reverse Engineering Workshop
İTÜ CAD and Reverse Engineering Workshop
 
Introduction to Casting Processes in Manufacturing
Introduction to Casting Processes in ManufacturingIntroduction to Casting Processes in Manufacturing
Introduction to Casting Processes in Manufacturing
 
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
 
Explosives Industry manufacturing process.pdf
Explosives Industry manufacturing process.pdfExplosives Industry manufacturing process.pdf
Explosives Industry manufacturing process.pdf
 
Digital Signal Processing Lecture notes n.pdf
Digital Signal Processing Lecture notes n.pdfDigital Signal Processing Lecture notes n.pdf
Digital Signal Processing Lecture notes n.pdf
 
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptxpower quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
power quality voltage fluctuation UNIT - I.pptx
 
Halogenation process of chemical process industries
Halogenation process of chemical process industriesHalogenation process of chemical process industries
Halogenation process of chemical process industries
 
Hall booking system project report .pdf
Hall booking system project report  .pdfHall booking system project report  .pdf
Hall booking system project report .pdf
 
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...
 
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptxCFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
CFD Simulation of By-pass Flow in a HRSG module by R&R Consult.pptx
 
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional ElectiveCME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
 
Courier management system project report.pdf
Courier management system project report.pdfCourier management system project report.pdf
Courier management system project report.pdf
 
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdfAutomobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdf
 

Basic Casing Design and Casing Point Selection.ppt

  • 1. Schlumberger Private Basic Casing Design and Casing Point Selection UTC Instructor
  • 2. Schlumberger Private Objectives On completion of this module the engineer should be able to… • Define the different types of casings. • Describe the casing point selection process • Describe the maximum load casing design method. • Demonstrate the bottom up method of casing setting depth initial estimation.
  • 3. Schlumberger Private 3 UTC Instructor Introduction • Design Considerations • Cost, (usually up to 17% of the total well cost) • Bottomhole Pressure • Service Conditions (casing handling) • Material Properties • Internal Yield • Collapse • Tension
  • 4. Schlumberger Private Statement of Standard All casing and tubing shall be designed to withstand all loads that can be imposed on them during installation and the lifetime of the well. No well construction program shall be commenced without an approved casing and tubing design.
  • 5. Schlumberger Private 5 UTC Instructor Mechanical Properties Of Steel • API Standards – Specification; API, 5A. – Bulletins; 5C2, properties of casing, tubing, drill pipe. – Recommended; API. RP7G, care and use of tubular. • H2S & CO2 • Exposure to more than 0.05 psia of H2S pressure and CO2 corrosion can lead to failure, – Common practice is the use chromium alloy (casing type L80 or Stainless steel)
  • 6. Schlumberger Private Types of Casing Strings • Conductor • Surface • Intermediate • Drilling Liner • Production
  • 7. Schlumberger Private Types of Casing Strings Conductor Casing  Purpose 1. Provides mud returns to tanks. 2. Divert flow in case of emergency. 3. Support subsequent casing loads.  Installation 1. Driven 2. Jetted 3. Drilled and cemented
  • 8. Schlumberger Private Types of Casing Strings Surface Casing  Purpose 1. Protect Fresh water aquifers. 2. Provide wellbore integrity, - Provides a BOP seal - Allows drilling into abnormal pressure safely by isolating shallow hazards. Definition: Casing set at or above 6500’ or in sub-normal pressure. Setting depth is based on mechanical and regulatory considerations
  • 9. Schlumberger Private Casing Point Selection Criteria Mechanical Considerations • Ability of the weakest exposed formation beneath the casing (usually shoe FG) to withstand the load imposed by well control operation. • Likelihood of differential sticking occurring while running casing.
  • 10. Schlumberger Private Types of Casing Strings Intermediate Casing  Purpose 1. Provide mechanical integrity. - Case off problem zones. - Allows higher blowout protection as it is set in more competent formations than surface casing (higher shoe strength) Definition: Casing set to 6500’ or deeper in abnormal pressure. Setting depth is based on mechanical considerations
  • 11. Schlumberger Private Types of Casing Strings Drilling Liners  Purpose 1. Provide mechanical integrity as intermediate casing but at lower cost. Definition: Partial string of casing hung in previously set casing string and is set to a depth greater than 6500’ or in abnormal pressure. Setting Depth is based on mechanical considerations
  • 12. Schlumberger Private Types of Casing Strings Production Casing/Liners  Purpose 1. Provide isolation of the producing zone from other zones. 2. Withstand the anticipated loads during production and testing operations for the wells life time. Setting Depth is the last string across the production zone. This may be a casing to surface or a liner that is hung.
  • 13. Schlumberger Private 13 UTC Instructor Casing Point Selection • Why is Casing set in the Hole? • Casing is set for two Drilling reasons; • To consolidate the hole already drilled, (steel filter cake) • To provide the pressure control integrity to drill ahead.
  • 14. Schlumberger Private 14 UTC Instructor Criteria For Selecting Casing Depths Each casing string is run as deep as possible based on kick tolerance, unless other reasons dictate it to be run higher.
  • 15. Schlumberger Private 15 UTC Instructor Other Restrictions On Casing Shoe Depth • Wellbore Stability Within the limit allowed by kick tolerance, we may restrict the length of OH sections, to minimize deterioration of wellbore with time • Mud Requirements Formations may affect casing depth (reactive shale) • Directional Requirements. Directional Problems may alter casing points (drag, torque)
  • 16. Schlumberger Private Casing Point Selection Criteria Other factors affecting casing setting depth. 1. Underground fresh water zones 2. Shallow hazards 3. Directional profile 4. Sidetrack requirement 5. ECD at shoe
  • 17. Schlumberger Private 17 UTC Instructor Special Criteria for Conductor The Conductor pipe needs to be set deep enough to carry subsequent axial loads from all other casing strings. • It also must withstand the bending loads from environmental conditions.
  • 18. Schlumberger Private 18 UTC Instructor Special Criteria for Surface Casing The Surface Casing is usually set in the first competent formation which is strong enough to close in on a kick.
  • 19. Schlumberger Private 19 UTC Instructor Special Criteria for Intermediate Casing The Intermediate Casing is set as deep as possible to allow sufficient shoe strength for drilling ahead.
  • 20. Schlumberger Private 20 UTC Instructor Intermediate Casing - other considerations Intermediate casing may also be set for directional or wellbore stability reasons • Reduce torques and drags in an extended reach hole. • Case off possible differential sticking zones and perform directional work below casing. • Case off some problem zones prior to drilling ahead.
  • 21. Schlumberger Private 21 UTC Instructor Special Criteria for Production Casing The Production Casing is set through or just above the reservoir, depending on the type of completion to be used.
  • 22. Schlumberger Private Casing Point Selection Criteria Information gathered prior to casing design. • Estimated pore pressure and rock strength using offset data. • The minimum and maximum casing sizes to be run at TD that would allow for logging testing and a completion program. • The effects of geological uncertainties on casing setting depths and the ability to safely circulate out the maximum anticipated kick volume
  • 23. Schlumberger Private Casing Point Selection Criteria After gathering Information • Develop a pore pressure and fracture gradient versus depth plot. • Plan the well from TD up. - Determine the maximum formation pressure at TD. - Add a Trip margin and determine minimum weight at TD.
  • 24. Schlumberger Private Bottom Up Method • Plot the pore pressure gradient curve • Plot the Mud weight curve. The mud weight should balance the highest PP in the OH with a TM of 0.5 ppg. • Plot the estimated actual FG curve, and the designed FG curve, which is FG less allowance for Well control, surge or ECD. • Start on the bottom on the mud weight curve and draw a vertical line up to the designed FG curve. This is the initial estimated production casing or liner. • Cont…..
  • 27. Schlumberger Private 27 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance Kick tolerance is the maximum volume gas kick which can be safely circulated out without causing formation failure at the weakest point of the open hole (usually deemed to be the casing shoe). (SICP) (SIDPP)
  • 28. Schlumberger Private 28 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance . Kick tolerance is a measure of the size of a gas kick that can be handled. The following assumptions are made…  A gas influx comes from TD up to the casing point or stays at TD. The kicking formation has a pore pressure equal to or greater than the mud hydrostatic.  Shut in casing pressure (SICP) = MAASP when the top of gas is at the casing shoe, using the drillers method.  Based on these assumptions, we calculate the volume of a gas kick. This is the maximum size of gas influx, which is what we call KICK TOLERANCE
  • 29. Schlumberger Private 29 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance More assumptions  For an Exploration or Appraisal well, we can assume that the kicking formation may have a pore pressure gradient of 10% higher than the mud gradient.  i.e. A planned mud gradient of 0.5 psi/ft will assume a pore pressure gradient at the kick depth of 0.55 psi/ft.  For a development well in a known area, assume that the kicking formation may have a pore pressure which is equal to the mud gradient.  In this case any kick taken will be a swabbed kick.
  • 30. Schlumberger Private 30 UTC Instructor The Well as a ‘U’-Tube - Static The Pressure at Point 1 = Pressure at Point 2 P1 = BHP = SIDPP + HPDS P2 = BHP = SICP + HPA P1
  • 31. Schlumberger Private 31 UTC Instructor The Well as a ‘U’-Tube - Static Therefore: P1 = P2 SIDPP@surf + HPDS = SICP@surf + HPA => SIDPP@surf = SICP@surf - HPDS + HPA => SIDPP@surf = MAASP@surf – MgxTVDTD +(TVDTD – Hi)Mg + GgxHi 1st Step: Determine what the maximum height of influx can be when it reaches the casing shoe*. *Assumed that weakest formation is at the shoe g g @surf @surf i G M SIDPP MAASP H   
  • 32. Schlumberger Private 32 UTC Instructor The Well as a ‘U’-Tube - Static • To find MAASP@surf & SIDPP @surf: – P@Shoe = MAASP@surf + Mg x TVDshoe = > MAASP@surf = P@Shoe - Mg x TVDshoe – P@TD = SIDPP @Surf + Mg x TVDTD = > SIDPP @Surf = P@TD - Mg x TVDTD
  • 33. Schlumberger Private 33 UTC Instructor The Well as a ‘U’-Tube - Static • Where: When kick at the shoe : P@Shoe = MAASP @ shoe = Fg x TVDshoe When kick is at TD: P@TD = SIDPP@TD = {Mg+(10%Mg)} x TVD TD Kick Gradient
  • 34. Schlumberger Private 34 UTC Instructor Hydrostatic Pressure Hydrostatic Pressure 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Pressure (psi) TVD (psi) Hydrostatic Pressure
  • 35. Schlumberger Private 35 UTC Instructor Hydrostatic Pressure & SIDPP SIDPP SIDPP@surf Hydrostatic Pressure 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Pressure (psi) TVD (psi) SIDPP Hydrostatic Pressure
  • 36. Schlumberger Private 36 UTC Instructor Hydrostatic Pressure & SIDPP & MAASP MAASP@surf MAASP SIDPP SIDPP@surf Hydrostatic Pressure 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Pressure (psi) TVD (psi) MAASP SIDPP Hydrostatic Pressure
  • 37. Schlumberger Private 37 UTC Instructor Hydrostatic Pressure & SIDPP & MAASP MAASP@Shoe MAASP@surf SIDPP@surf SIDPP@TD Mud Hydrostatic Pressure 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Pressure (psi) TVD (psi) MAASP SIDPP Hydrostatic Pressure MAASP@Surf = MAASP@Shoe - Hydro. P@Shoe SIDPP@Surf = SIDPP@TD - Hydro. P@TD
  • 39. Schlumberger Private 39 UTC Instructor Kick tolerance 2nd Step: The height of influx represents a volume: V@shoe = Hi@shoe x Annular Capacity@shoe So this is the influx volume which will cause the pressure at the shoe to reach the maximum allowable value when the kick reaches the shoe.
  • 40. Schlumberger Private 40 UTC Instructor Kick tolerance • However, we also have to consider the possibility that the pressure at the shoe can reach the Maximum allowable value when the kick enters the wellbore!!! • Therefore, we have to calculate the second kick tolerance at TD.
  • 41. Schlumberger Private 41 UTC Instructor Annular Gas Expansion • Pressure reduces in gas as depth of gas in well decreases. • Gas expands as it rises and pressure is reduced (Boyle’s Law). • Gas height increases, mud height decreases. So: P1V1 = P2V2
  • 42. Schlumberger Private 42 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance 3rd Step: Therefore, we can calculate V@TD & the height of the influx at TD at that V@TD : P@Shoe x V@Shoe = P@TD x V@TD And @TD @TD @TD Capacity Annular V H  @TD @Shoe @Shoe @TD P V x P V 
  • 43. Schlumberger Private 43 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance The final kick tolerance is determined by which of either of the two kick tolerances is the smallest:  If V@Shoe> V@TD , and if H@shoe >H@TD,then V@TD is the kick tolerance  If V@Shoe> V@TD , and if H@shoe < H@TD,then recalculate V@TD for critical height H@Shoe at TD.  If V@Shoe< V@TD, then we need to calculate a new volume using the critical height (H@Shoe) as if it were around the BHA and DS.
  • 44. Schlumberger Private 44 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance Rule of Thumb • If MAASP psi  target Vertical Depth in feet < 0.1, kick tolerance is going to be low. • If MAASP psi  target Vertical Depth in feet > 0.1, kick tolerance is probably going to be OK.
  • 45. Schlumberger Private 45 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance Example 1: Calculate the Kick Tolerance for the following scenario. Casing shoe at 6000’ with a FG of 0.72 psi/ft, plan to drill to the next casing point at 8500’ with a mud gradient of 0.62 psi/ft in a vertical exploration well. (Kick gradient 10%more than mud gradient.) Assume a gas gradient of 0.12 psi/ft at the casing shoe, and 12 ¼” hole with 5” DP and 300’ of 8” drill collars.
  • 46. Schlumberger Private 48 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance Example2: Calculate the Kick Tolerance for the following scenario. Casing shoe at 5000’ with a FG of 0.65 psi/ft, plan to drill to the next casing point at 7500’ with a mud gradient of 0.55 psi/ft in a vertical exploration well. (Kick gradient 10%more than mud gradient.) Assume a gas gradient of 0.12 psi/ft at the casing shoe, and 12 ¼” hole with 5 7/8” DP and 300’ of 8” drill collars.
  • 47. Schlumberger Private Maximum Load casing Design • This is a method for selecting specific casing based on operational conditions and resulting stresses. • Concept: Design for most severe realistic load to minimize risk of failure. • Maximum load cases are based on geographical region, geologic section and organizational philosophy.
  • 48. Schlumberger Private Maximum Load casing Design • Design Cases: – Burst – Collapse – Tension – Special considerations: – H2S/CO2, Temperature, Multi-axial stress correction, Stability.
  • 49. Schlumberger Private Steps for Basic Casing Design Develop Maximum Load case condition for burst Calculate resulting loads, (Design Line) Select casing strings with load capacity >/= Load line Burst Design Collapse Design Develop Maximum Load case condition for Collapse For casing selected in burst design, check that load capacity >/= Load line Develop Maximum Load case condition for Tension Tension Design Calculate resulting loads, (Design Line) Calculate resulting loads, (Design Line) Multiply design line by safety factor, (Load Line) Multiply design line by safety factor, (Load Line) Multiply design line by safety factor, (Load Line) For casing selected in collapse design, check that load capacity >/= Load line
  • 50. Schlumberger Private 52 UTC Instructor Minimum Design Factors DESIGN LOADS Surface & intermediate casings, drilling liners Production casings/ liners Tubing Collapse 1.0 1.1 1.125 Burst - normal service - critical service 1.1 1.25 1.1 1.25 1.1 1.25 Tension pipe body connection 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.3 Compression 1.3 1.3 1.3 Triaxial 1.25 1.25 1.25
  • 51. Schlumberger Private Casing Burst Design Maximum pressure at casing shoe,dependent on FG. (Internal Pre s fg inj D SF EMW P ) ( 052 . 0   The maximum internal burst loading pressure at surface is a function of the injection pressure, and is given as: s g shoe inj isurf D G P P   @ Load Line External pressure due to annular drilling fluid….0.465psi/ft D G P f e  Worst case scenario is gas filled above FG+SF
  • 52. Schlumberger Private Casing Burst Design Pressure with burst design factor of 1.1 Design Line ) ( @ @ e shoe inj shoe br P P P   @ shoe @ surface ) ( e isurf brsurf P P P   @ shoe @ surface b br b DF P P  b brsurf bsurf DF P P  From the casing Tables choose appropriate casing
  • 53. Schlumberger Private Casing Collapse Design Load Line Worst case scenario is full evacuation with Mud on the outside D P m e ) ( 052 . 0   Maximum collapse pressure at shoe, (external pressure) The casing is empty and open to atmospheric pressure. This will render the surface pressure to be 0 psi Design Line 1 . 1 ) ( e C P P  From the casing Tables check casing collapse rating
  • 54. Schlumberger Private Casing Tension Design Worst case scenario is stuck casing with an over pull 100,000 lbs a As per SLB casing manual, TVD should be used for gravity relate Tensile load calculation. If Biaxial stress calculations are not bein made then a safety factor of 1.6 shall be used. Load Line lbs wL F TVD wt 000 , 100   Design Line SF F F wt wtd ) (  From the casing Tables check casing tensile rating Tensile load will change if pumps are on while pulling on casing
  • 55. Schlumberger Private 57 UTC Instructor Casing Sizes Decision Tree Tubing size, in Casing & liners size, in Bit & hole size, in Casing size, in Casing & liners size, in Bit & hole size, in Casing & liners size, in Bit & hole size, in Casing size, in Bit & hole size, in 16 14-3/4 11-3/4 11-7/8 10-5/8 8-5/8 7-7/8 5-1/2 5-3/4 4-1/2 3-1/2 1.9 20 17-1/2 13-3/8 14 12-1/4 8-3/4 6-1/8 4-1/2 2-3/8 10-3/4 9-1/2 7-5/8 7-3/4 6-1/2 5 24 20 16 14-3/4 11-3/4 11-7/8 10-5/8 8-5/8 7-7/8 5-1/2 2-7/8 30 26 20 17-1/2 13-3/8 14 12-1/4 9-5/8 8-1/2 8-3/4 7 3-1/2 18-5/8 9-5/8 9-7/8 8-1/2 7 5-7/8 6-5/8 4-3/4 4 2-1/16
  • 56. Schlumberger Private 58 UTC Instructor API CASING SPECIFICATIONS • API Specifications (5A, 5AC and 5AX) • Weight of Casing • Nominal Weight Expressed in lb/ft or kg/mt ( Weight of CSG plus tool joint ). • Plain End Weight Expressed in lb/ft or kg/mt ( Weight of CSG w/out tool joint) . • Length of Casing Range Length (ft) Average length (ft) 1 16 -25 22 2 25 -34 31 3 Over 34 42
  • 57. Schlumberger Private 59 UTC Instructor API CASING SPECIFICATIONS • Colour Grade Identifications
  • 59. Schlumberger Private 61 UTC Instructor Maximum Load Case - Example • Scenario for burst- Gas filled at shoe fracture pressure and normal pressure gradient outside. • Scenario for collapse- Total evacuation, drilling mud in the annulus. • Scenario for tension- no biaxial and triaxial calculations applied. Exploration Well 9 5/8" Casing 47 ppf N-80 setting depth 9500' TVD Mud weight casing will be set in is 12.5 ppg Normal pressure gradient is 0.465 psi/ft Gas gradient is 0.12 psi/ft Fracture gradient at shoe 16 ppg Burst design factor 1.1 Collapse design factor 1.0 Tension design factor 1.6
  • 60. Schlumberger Private 62 UTC Instructor Maximum Load Case – Example 2 • Scenario for burst- Gas filled at shoe fracture pressure and normal pressure gradient outside. • Scenario for collapse- Total evacuation, drilling mud in the annulus. • Scenario for tension- No biaxial and triaxial calculations applied. Development well -13 3/8" Casing /Setting depth 5000' MD/3500’TVD -Mud weight casing will be set in is 10 ppg -Normal pressure gradient is 0.465 psi/ft -Gas gradient is 0.12 psi/ft -Fracture gradient at shoe 14.5 ppg -Burst design factor 1.1 -Collapse design factor 1.0 -Tension design factor 1.6
  • 61. Schlumberger Private 63 UTC Instructor Kick Tolerance Example: Calculate the Kick Tolerance for the following scenario. Casing shoe at 3500’ with a FG of 0.72 psi/ft, plan to drill to the next casing point at 8500’ with a mud gradient of 0.56 psi/ft in a vertical exploration well. (Kick gradient 10%more than mud gradient.) Assume a gas gradient of 0.12 psi/ft at the casing shoe, and 12 ¼” hole with 5 1/2” DP and 300’ of 8 1/4” drill collars.