ATROPHIC RHINITIS
Dr Grace Vandana
MS ENT (PG)
DEFINITION
 Atrophic rhinitis is a chronic nasal disease
characterized by progressive atrophy of the mucosa
and the underlying bone of the turbinates.
 It is associated with viscid secretions which dry
resulting in crust formation with a characteristic foul
odour,called ozaena.
HISTORY
 Dr Spencer Watson called it ozenae in 1875
 Dr Bernhard Fraenkel 1876 described triad
 Fetor
 Crustings and
 Atrophy of nasal structures
EPIDEMIOLOGY
 0.3-1% in countries with high prevalence
 More common in animals- swines and cattle
 Predominant in young and middle aged
 More common in females
 More common in tropical countries
 Most common in low socoeconomic classes living
in poor hygenic conditions.
AETIOLOGY
 The precise aetiology is still unknown.
 Cases wherein no specific aetiologic factor can be identified
are designated primary atrophic rhinitis.
 Cases wherein a specific aetiologic factor can be implicated
are designated secondary atrophic rhinitis.
 Developmental :
 Congenitally spacious nasal cavity
 Poor pneumatization of maxillary antrum
Infections:
 A wide range of bacterial flora have been reported from
the nasal secretions of these patients, namely,
 Coccobacillus foetidus ozaena,
 Diptheroid bacilli and
 Klebsiella ozaenae.
 Recent studies have identified
 Bordetella bronchoseptica and
 Pasteurella multocida, and have suggested that
inoculation of these organisms into animals has produced
changes similar to atrophic rhinitis.
 Biochemical studies of the nasal aspirate in atrophic rhinitis
have noted a significant decrease in the total phospholipids
and also a change in the phospholipid profile.
 This suggests a possible role for surfactant deficiency in
the aetiopathogenesis.
 Surfactant deficiency in nasal secretion causing ciliary
dysfunction leading to stasis of nasal secretions and
crusting.
 Primary atrophic rhinitis usually commences at puberty and is
much more common in females, suggesting that endocrine
imbalance may have some role to play.
 The disease is more common in people of low socioeconomic
background and has been associated with poor nutrition and
iron-deficiency.
 Heredity is an important factor and there also appears to be a
racial influence.
 It is more common in yellow and Latin races and American
blacks are more susceptible as compared to natives of
equatorial Africa.
 Autoimmune:
 viral infection / malnutrition / immune deficiency
triggers destructive autoimmune process on nasal
mucosa
 Autonomic Imbalance:
 Excessive vasoconstriction from autonomic
imbalances as a reason for development of AR has
been described.
 Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome
(R.S.D.S.) causes vasodilatation & hyperaemic
decalcification of turbinates followed by
vasoconstriction
 Secondary Atrophic Rhinitis
 Long-standing purulent sinusitis
 Iatrogenic:
 Radical turbinectomy
 post-radiotherapy
 Tuberculosis, Syphilis,Leprosy, Rhinoscleroma
 Deviated nasal septum (atrophy in wider nasalcavity)
PATHOLOGY
 Patches of metaplasia -- ciliated columnar epithelium to
nonkeratinized or keratinized squamous epithelium.
 Lamina propria--- chronic cellular infiltration, granulation
tissue and fibrosis.
 Mucous glands are decreased in size and number.
 Vascular changes:
 Decreased vascularity,
 Periarteritis
 Endarteritis of the terminal arterioles.
 Taylor and young described vasodilatation of the
capillaries with increased alkaline phosphatase
activity leading to bone resorption
 Accumulation of lymphocytes & plasma cells.
 Squamous metaplasia from ciliated columnar
 Ciliary destruction & decrease in nasal glands
 Bone resorption
 Types:
 AR type I
 Common type (50–80 per cent of all cases),
 Endarteritis obliterans, periarteritis and periarterial
fibrosis of the terminal arterioles as a result of
chronic infections with round cell and plasma cell
infiltration.
 Benefit from the vasodilator effects of oestrogen
therapy.
 AR type II
 Less common (20–50 per cent of all cases)
 Capillary vasodilatation
 Endothelial cells of dilated capillaries have more
 Cytoplasm than normal and show a positive
alkaline phosphatase reaction suggesting active
bone resorption, which is a feature of the disease
 Not amenable to oestrogen therapy.
BIOPSY
Normal atrophic rhinitis
CLINICAL FEATURES
 Nasal crusting which is brown black or dark green
in colour
 Thick purulent discharge
 Foul smell due to the anerobic flora
 Anosmia
 Headache, epistaxis
 Nasal obstruction
 Pharyngitis sicca
 Causes of anosmia
 Loss of olfactory neural elements
 Thick secretion & crusts over olfactory area
 Degeneration of secretory glands
 Scanty mucous for dissolving odoriferous materials
 Causes of nasal obstruction
 Blunting of sensory nerve endings, thus resulting in
a diminished sensation of air flow.
 Crust formation
CLINICAL EXAMINATION
 Presence of fetor
 Changes in the nasal passages
 Atrophy of turbinates resulting in widening of the
cavity,
 Presence of green crusts and thick purulent
discharge.
 Occasionally, the condition may be complicated by
maggot infestation in the nose.
INVESTIGATIONS
 General : hemogram
 Specific Investigations
Saccharine test: decreased nasal muco-
ciliaryclearance time
 Serum iron & protein levels: malnutrition
 Culture & sensitivity of nasal discharge
 Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy
 X-ray P.N.S.: maxillary sinusitis
 C.T. scan P.N.S.
 Mucoperiosteal thickening
resorption of ethmoid bulla & uncinate process
 Hypoplasia of maxillary sinuses
 Roomy nasal cavities
 Erosion & bowing of lateral nasal wall
 Atrophy of turbinates
 Other Specific Investigations
Chest X-ray: T.B., bronchiectasis
 Serology for syphilis: V.D.R.L.
 Sputum for AFB, Mantoux test: T.B
 Nasal smear study: Leprosy
 Complement fixation test & biopsy:Rhinoscleroma
COMPLICATIONS AND SEQUELAE
 Nasal septal perforation and saddle nose
deformity:
 Severe cases left untreated may be complicated by
destruction of nasal bone and cartilages lead to
septal perforations and saddle nose deformities.
 Secondary rhinosinusitis
 Local and systemic spread of infection: Spread
of infection to the pharynx, larynx, lungs and ears,
and intracranial spread in immunocompromised
patients is possible
 Atrophic pharyngitis and laryngitis. Pharyngitis
sicca is a frequent co-morbidity in AR with a dry
pharyngeal mucosa. Dislodged crusts may cause
choking episodes
 Chronic dacryocystitis.
 A rare complication of ar in the form of dacryocystitis
has been noted
 Nasal myiasis.
 Seen in neglected cases of primary ar, especially in
patients of lower socioeconomic status living in poor
hygienic conditions.
 The putrefied nasal debris and foul smell attract flies of
the genus chrysomia (c. Bezianna vilteneauve).
TREATMENT
 Aims to restore nasal hydration and minimalisation
of crustings
 Medical and conservative treatment
 Surgical treatment
 Regular nasal cleansing is the basis of conservative
treatment.
 Alkaline Nasal Douche
 Sodium bicarbonate (28.4g) --loosens nasal crusts
 Sodium biborate (28.4g) –Antiseptic
 Sodium chloride (56.7g) --makes solution isotonic
 Mixed in 280 ml of warm water to make the solution
 Glucose–glycerine nose drops.
 Mixing 75g of gycerine and adding 25g of glucose
 25% glucose is used to inhibit saprophytic infection and
proteolytic bacteria (glucose on fermentation produces
lactic acid and an acidic pH that inhibits bacterial growth),
and promote the growth of commensal flora.
 Glycerine helps as a lubricant and hygroscopic agent
(adsorbs water from the atmosphere and moistens mucosa,
and hence impedes crust formation).
 Glycerine may also cause some degree of irritation and
hence improve vascularity.
 These nose drops should be applied three or four times a
day after douching the nose.
 Liquid paraffin nose drops
 Effective in lubricating the nasal mucosa and in
removal of crusts
 Long-term use is not recommended in view of
reports of paraffin granulomas and inhalational
lipoid pneumonias.
 Oestradiol in arachis oil.
 available for instillation into the nose as drops and
sprays (10 000 units/ml)
 oestrogens are only useful for Young and Taylor
Type I AR
 oestradiol may worsen the situation in the Type II
variety.
 Kemicetene antiozaena solution.
 90 mg of chloramphenicol
 0.64 mg of oestradiol diproprionate
 900 IU of vitamin D2 and propylene glycol in each
millilitre.
 This is used in the form of nose drops after
douching.
 Chloramphenicol/streptomycin drops.
 use after douching.
 Local treatment with injection of a mixture of
streptomycin and novocaine has been tried with
satisfactory results.
 Injections of human placental extract have been
administered both systemically and locally
(submucosal/intranasal) and have been noted to
result in an improvement.
 The extract (0.5 ml) is injected into each nasal
cavity per week for 24 weeks
 Action of Placental extract
 Progesterone leads to hyperplasia of nasal mucosa
& glandular secretion
 Oestrogen leads to vasodilatation
 Biogenic stimulator of metabolic & regenerative
process
 Intra-placental serum boosts up immunity
 Mechanical narrowing of nasal passage
 Antibiotics and antimicrobials
 Systemic (intravenous) aminoglycoside (Tobramycin)
therapy for two weeks in addition to topical gentamicin.
 Good results have been reported in one study where
Rifampicin 600 mg once daily for 12 weeks was
administered.
 More recently, ciprofloxacin in a daily dose of 500–750
mg bid for one to three months has been tried
successfully, i.e. measured by the disappearance of
crusts, odour and K. ozaenae.
 Iron, zinc, protein and vitamin (A and D)
supplements.
 Recommended especially in cases of malnutrition
and established deficiencies.
 The use of potassium iodide by mouth with the
object of increasing nasal secretion has been
recommended.
 Prostheses:
 Non-surgical closure of the nasal vestibule using
prostheses
 including occlusion of the nostril with an obturator made
from dimethylpolysiloxane.
 This is useful in cases of secondary AR where formal
closure of the nostril is contraindicated in view of the
treatment necessary for the primary disease.
 Another similar device made of clear acrylic resin called a
‘pin-hole nasal prosthesis’ has been described more
recently.
NASAL OBTURATORS
 Decongestants or antihistamines.
 Strongly contraindicated in AR as they worsen the
pathology and hence the clinical course of the
disease.
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
 Aim of Surgery:
o Decrease trauma of air turbulence
 Nasal closure
 Volume reduction
o Increase nasal secretions
 Parotid duct implantation into maxillary sinus
o Increase vascularity of nasal mucosa
 Denervation procedures
 Nasal implantation of maxillary sinus mucosa
 The principles of surgery may be divided largely into four
groups.
1. Decreasing the size of the nasal cavities: redudes
turbulence of air currents in roomy air cavities and thus
preventing drying and crustings.
2. Promoting regeneration of normal nasal mucosa.
This may be achieved by allowing the nasal cavities to
rest by temporary closure (complete or partial) of the
nostrils
3.Increasing lubrication of the dry nasal mucosa. This is
achieved by increasing the secretory abilities of the nasal
cavities or by introducing secretions from elsewhere
4.Improving vascularity of the nasal cavities.
 This is achieved either by blocking the sympathetic
nervous system (stellate ganglion block or cervical
sympathectomy)
 subserving the nose or by introducing grafts (e.G.
Placenta, maxillary mucosal flaps, buccal flaps) that
improve vascularity
Types of surgery
Nasal closure: Young
Modified Young
Volume reduction: Lautenslager
Wilson
Sublabial implants
Vestibuloplasty
Denervation: Cervical sympathectomy
Stellate ganglion block
Sphenopalatine ganglion block
Salivary irrigation: Parotid duct implantation
 Young’s operation:
 Only 1 nostril closed
completely by raising 2 circumferential flaps (inner mucosal
& outer cutaneous) in nasalvestibule & suturing them in
midline.
 Modified Young’s operation
 Similar to youngs but keeping a 3 mm opening on both
sides.
 Recannalisation done after few months with a tri-radiate
(Mercedes Benz) incision
 Advantages of Modified Young
 Progress of disease can be monitored with 2.7 mm nasal
endoscope
 Glucose in glycerine drops can be instilled
 Both nostrils can be operated at one sitting
 Nasal breathing preserved
 No complaints of de-nasal voice
 Better cosmetic result
Vestibuloplasty :
 Ghosh described an alternative surgical technique
of vestibuloplasty, wherein a posteriorly based skin
flap is raised in the lateral wall of the nasal
vestibule and sutured on itself, thus decreasing the
lateral flow of air into the nasal cavity
 Lautenslager’s operation:
 Fracture & medial
displacement of lateral nasal wall
 Wilson’s operation: submucosal injection of Teflon
paste
 Raghav Sharan’s operation.
 The mucosa of the maxillary antrum is elevated and
brought into the nasal cavity on each side through the
antrostomy.
 The benefits are perhaps three-fold: decreasing the size
of the cavity, and improving lubrication and vascularity
 Cervical Sympathectomy
 Stellate ganglion block/ cervical chain block:
 through an anterior paratracheal approach, 10-15 cc of 1
per cent xylocaine is injected slowly.
 The success of the procedure is judged by the
appearance of Horner’s syndrome, congestion of the
ipsilateral tympanic membrane and congestion of the
ipsilateral nasal mucosa.
 It is reported that foetor and crusting are relieved within
eight to 10 blocks and that this is maintained for up to four
to eight days after cessation of blocks.
 risk of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy
 Sublabial implantation: bone, cartilage,
fat,placental bits, hydroxyapatite + fibrin
paste,Plastipore, acrylic resin, silastic
 Parotid duct implantation into maxillary sinus
{Wittmack’s operation}
 Rhinitis Sicca
 Mild form of atrophic rhinitis
Seen in hot, dry, dusty places (bakers, goldsmiths);
alcoholics & anaemics
 Crusting present anteriorly only
 Bone atrophy & foetor are absent
 Tx: Nasal douching + change of surrounding
 Rhinitis Caseosa
 Synonym: Nasal cholesteatoma
 Chronic inflammation with deposition of foul
smelling cheesy material in nasal cavity.
 Nasal obstruction---stasis of secretions & exfoliated
cells---putrefaction---caseation
 Treatment: 1. Removal of cheesy debris
 2. Correction of nasal obstruction
REFERENCES
 Scott brown 7th edition
 Dutt, S., & Kameswaran, M. (2005). The aetiology
and management of atrophic rhinitis. The Journal of
Laryngology & Otology, 119(11), 843-852.
doi:10.1258/002221505774783377
 Hazarika 3rd edition
 Dhingra 6th edition
atrophic_rhinitis.pptx

atrophic_rhinitis.pptx

  • 1.
    ATROPHIC RHINITIS Dr GraceVandana MS ENT (PG)
  • 2.
    DEFINITION  Atrophic rhinitisis a chronic nasal disease characterized by progressive atrophy of the mucosa and the underlying bone of the turbinates.  It is associated with viscid secretions which dry resulting in crust formation with a characteristic foul odour,called ozaena.
  • 3.
    HISTORY  Dr SpencerWatson called it ozenae in 1875  Dr Bernhard Fraenkel 1876 described triad  Fetor  Crustings and  Atrophy of nasal structures
  • 4.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY  0.3-1% incountries with high prevalence  More common in animals- swines and cattle  Predominant in young and middle aged  More common in females  More common in tropical countries  Most common in low socoeconomic classes living in poor hygenic conditions.
  • 5.
    AETIOLOGY  The preciseaetiology is still unknown.  Cases wherein no specific aetiologic factor can be identified are designated primary atrophic rhinitis.  Cases wherein a specific aetiologic factor can be implicated are designated secondary atrophic rhinitis.
  • 6.
     Developmental : Congenitally spacious nasal cavity  Poor pneumatization of maxillary antrum
  • 7.
    Infections:  A widerange of bacterial flora have been reported from the nasal secretions of these patients, namely,  Coccobacillus foetidus ozaena,  Diptheroid bacilli and  Klebsiella ozaenae.  Recent studies have identified  Bordetella bronchoseptica and  Pasteurella multocida, and have suggested that inoculation of these organisms into animals has produced changes similar to atrophic rhinitis.
  • 8.
     Biochemical studiesof the nasal aspirate in atrophic rhinitis have noted a significant decrease in the total phospholipids and also a change in the phospholipid profile.  This suggests a possible role for surfactant deficiency in the aetiopathogenesis.  Surfactant deficiency in nasal secretion causing ciliary dysfunction leading to stasis of nasal secretions and crusting.
  • 9.
     Primary atrophicrhinitis usually commences at puberty and is much more common in females, suggesting that endocrine imbalance may have some role to play.  The disease is more common in people of low socioeconomic background and has been associated with poor nutrition and iron-deficiency.  Heredity is an important factor and there also appears to be a racial influence.  It is more common in yellow and Latin races and American blacks are more susceptible as compared to natives of equatorial Africa.
  • 10.
     Autoimmune:  viralinfection / malnutrition / immune deficiency triggers destructive autoimmune process on nasal mucosa  Autonomic Imbalance:  Excessive vasoconstriction from autonomic imbalances as a reason for development of AR has been described.  Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome (R.S.D.S.) causes vasodilatation & hyperaemic decalcification of turbinates followed by vasoconstriction
  • 11.
     Secondary AtrophicRhinitis  Long-standing purulent sinusitis  Iatrogenic:  Radical turbinectomy  post-radiotherapy  Tuberculosis, Syphilis,Leprosy, Rhinoscleroma  Deviated nasal septum (atrophy in wider nasalcavity)
  • 12.
    PATHOLOGY  Patches ofmetaplasia -- ciliated columnar epithelium to nonkeratinized or keratinized squamous epithelium.  Lamina propria--- chronic cellular infiltration, granulation tissue and fibrosis.  Mucous glands are decreased in size and number.
  • 13.
     Vascular changes: Decreased vascularity,  Periarteritis  Endarteritis of the terminal arterioles.  Taylor and young described vasodilatation of the capillaries with increased alkaline phosphatase activity leading to bone resorption
  • 14.
     Accumulation oflymphocytes & plasma cells.  Squamous metaplasia from ciliated columnar  Ciliary destruction & decrease in nasal glands  Bone resorption  Types:  AR type I  Common type (50–80 per cent of all cases),  Endarteritis obliterans, periarteritis and periarterial fibrosis of the terminal arterioles as a result of chronic infections with round cell and plasma cell infiltration.  Benefit from the vasodilator effects of oestrogen therapy.
  • 15.
     AR typeII  Less common (20–50 per cent of all cases)  Capillary vasodilatation  Endothelial cells of dilated capillaries have more  Cytoplasm than normal and show a positive alkaline phosphatase reaction suggesting active bone resorption, which is a feature of the disease  Not amenable to oestrogen therapy.
  • 16.
  • 17.
    CLINICAL FEATURES  Nasalcrusting which is brown black or dark green in colour  Thick purulent discharge  Foul smell due to the anerobic flora  Anosmia  Headache, epistaxis  Nasal obstruction  Pharyngitis sicca
  • 18.
     Causes ofanosmia  Loss of olfactory neural elements  Thick secretion & crusts over olfactory area  Degeneration of secretory glands  Scanty mucous for dissolving odoriferous materials  Causes of nasal obstruction  Blunting of sensory nerve endings, thus resulting in a diminished sensation of air flow.  Crust formation
  • 19.
    CLINICAL EXAMINATION  Presenceof fetor  Changes in the nasal passages  Atrophy of turbinates resulting in widening of the cavity,  Presence of green crusts and thick purulent discharge.  Occasionally, the condition may be complicated by maggot infestation in the nose.
  • 21.
    INVESTIGATIONS  General :hemogram  Specific Investigations Saccharine test: decreased nasal muco- ciliaryclearance time  Serum iron & protein levels: malnutrition  Culture & sensitivity of nasal discharge  Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy  X-ray P.N.S.: maxillary sinusitis
  • 23.
     C.T. scanP.N.S.  Mucoperiosteal thickening resorption of ethmoid bulla & uncinate process  Hypoplasia of maxillary sinuses  Roomy nasal cavities  Erosion & bowing of lateral nasal wall  Atrophy of turbinates
  • 26.
     Other SpecificInvestigations Chest X-ray: T.B., bronchiectasis  Serology for syphilis: V.D.R.L.  Sputum for AFB, Mantoux test: T.B  Nasal smear study: Leprosy  Complement fixation test & biopsy:Rhinoscleroma
  • 27.
    COMPLICATIONS AND SEQUELAE Nasal septal perforation and saddle nose deformity:  Severe cases left untreated may be complicated by destruction of nasal bone and cartilages lead to septal perforations and saddle nose deformities.  Secondary rhinosinusitis  Local and systemic spread of infection: Spread of infection to the pharynx, larynx, lungs and ears, and intracranial spread in immunocompromised patients is possible
  • 28.
     Atrophic pharyngitisand laryngitis. Pharyngitis sicca is a frequent co-morbidity in AR with a dry pharyngeal mucosa. Dislodged crusts may cause choking episodes  Chronic dacryocystitis.  A rare complication of ar in the form of dacryocystitis has been noted  Nasal myiasis.  Seen in neglected cases of primary ar, especially in patients of lower socioeconomic status living in poor hygienic conditions.  The putrefied nasal debris and foul smell attract flies of the genus chrysomia (c. Bezianna vilteneauve).
  • 29.
    TREATMENT  Aims torestore nasal hydration and minimalisation of crustings  Medical and conservative treatment  Surgical treatment
  • 30.
     Regular nasalcleansing is the basis of conservative treatment.  Alkaline Nasal Douche  Sodium bicarbonate (28.4g) --loosens nasal crusts  Sodium biborate (28.4g) –Antiseptic  Sodium chloride (56.7g) --makes solution isotonic  Mixed in 280 ml of warm water to make the solution
  • 31.
     Glucose–glycerine nosedrops.  Mixing 75g of gycerine and adding 25g of glucose  25% glucose is used to inhibit saprophytic infection and proteolytic bacteria (glucose on fermentation produces lactic acid and an acidic pH that inhibits bacterial growth), and promote the growth of commensal flora.  Glycerine helps as a lubricant and hygroscopic agent (adsorbs water from the atmosphere and moistens mucosa, and hence impedes crust formation).  Glycerine may also cause some degree of irritation and hence improve vascularity.  These nose drops should be applied three or four times a day after douching the nose.
  • 32.
     Liquid paraffinnose drops  Effective in lubricating the nasal mucosa and in removal of crusts  Long-term use is not recommended in view of reports of paraffin granulomas and inhalational lipoid pneumonias.
  • 33.
     Oestradiol inarachis oil.  available for instillation into the nose as drops and sprays (10 000 units/ml)  oestrogens are only useful for Young and Taylor Type I AR  oestradiol may worsen the situation in the Type II variety.
  • 34.
     Kemicetene antiozaenasolution.  90 mg of chloramphenicol  0.64 mg of oestradiol diproprionate  900 IU of vitamin D2 and propylene glycol in each millilitre.  This is used in the form of nose drops after douching.
  • 35.
     Chloramphenicol/streptomycin drops. use after douching.  Local treatment with injection of a mixture of streptomycin and novocaine has been tried with satisfactory results.
  • 36.
     Injections ofhuman placental extract have been administered both systemically and locally (submucosal/intranasal) and have been noted to result in an improvement.  The extract (0.5 ml) is injected into each nasal cavity per week for 24 weeks
  • 37.
     Action ofPlacental extract  Progesterone leads to hyperplasia of nasal mucosa & glandular secretion  Oestrogen leads to vasodilatation  Biogenic stimulator of metabolic & regenerative process  Intra-placental serum boosts up immunity  Mechanical narrowing of nasal passage
  • 38.
     Antibiotics andantimicrobials  Systemic (intravenous) aminoglycoside (Tobramycin) therapy for two weeks in addition to topical gentamicin.  Good results have been reported in one study where Rifampicin 600 mg once daily for 12 weeks was administered.  More recently, ciprofloxacin in a daily dose of 500–750 mg bid for one to three months has been tried successfully, i.e. measured by the disappearance of crusts, odour and K. ozaenae.
  • 39.
     Iron, zinc,protein and vitamin (A and D) supplements.  Recommended especially in cases of malnutrition and established deficiencies.  The use of potassium iodide by mouth with the object of increasing nasal secretion has been recommended.
  • 40.
     Prostheses:  Non-surgicalclosure of the nasal vestibule using prostheses  including occlusion of the nostril with an obturator made from dimethylpolysiloxane.  This is useful in cases of secondary AR where formal closure of the nostril is contraindicated in view of the treatment necessary for the primary disease.  Another similar device made of clear acrylic resin called a ‘pin-hole nasal prosthesis’ has been described more recently.
  • 41.
  • 42.
     Decongestants orantihistamines.  Strongly contraindicated in AR as they worsen the pathology and hence the clinical course of the disease.
  • 43.
    SURGICAL MANAGEMENT  Aimof Surgery: o Decrease trauma of air turbulence  Nasal closure  Volume reduction o Increase nasal secretions  Parotid duct implantation into maxillary sinus o Increase vascularity of nasal mucosa  Denervation procedures  Nasal implantation of maxillary sinus mucosa
  • 44.
     The principlesof surgery may be divided largely into four groups. 1. Decreasing the size of the nasal cavities: redudes turbulence of air currents in roomy air cavities and thus preventing drying and crustings. 2. Promoting regeneration of normal nasal mucosa. This may be achieved by allowing the nasal cavities to rest by temporary closure (complete or partial) of the nostrils
  • 45.
    3.Increasing lubrication ofthe dry nasal mucosa. This is achieved by increasing the secretory abilities of the nasal cavities or by introducing secretions from elsewhere 4.Improving vascularity of the nasal cavities.  This is achieved either by blocking the sympathetic nervous system (stellate ganglion block or cervical sympathectomy)  subserving the nose or by introducing grafts (e.G. Placenta, maxillary mucosal flaps, buccal flaps) that improve vascularity
  • 46.
    Types of surgery Nasalclosure: Young Modified Young Volume reduction: Lautenslager Wilson Sublabial implants Vestibuloplasty Denervation: Cervical sympathectomy Stellate ganglion block Sphenopalatine ganglion block Salivary irrigation: Parotid duct implantation
  • 47.
     Young’s operation: Only 1 nostril closed completely by raising 2 circumferential flaps (inner mucosal & outer cutaneous) in nasalvestibule & suturing them in midline.  Modified Young’s operation  Similar to youngs but keeping a 3 mm opening on both sides.  Recannalisation done after few months with a tri-radiate (Mercedes Benz) incision
  • 50.
     Advantages ofModified Young  Progress of disease can be monitored with 2.7 mm nasal endoscope  Glucose in glycerine drops can be instilled  Both nostrils can be operated at one sitting  Nasal breathing preserved  No complaints of de-nasal voice  Better cosmetic result
  • 51.
    Vestibuloplasty :  Ghoshdescribed an alternative surgical technique of vestibuloplasty, wherein a posteriorly based skin flap is raised in the lateral wall of the nasal vestibule and sutured on itself, thus decreasing the lateral flow of air into the nasal cavity
  • 52.
     Lautenslager’s operation: Fracture & medial displacement of lateral nasal wall  Wilson’s operation: submucosal injection of Teflon paste
  • 53.
     Raghav Sharan’soperation.  The mucosa of the maxillary antrum is elevated and brought into the nasal cavity on each side through the antrostomy.  The benefits are perhaps three-fold: decreasing the size of the cavity, and improving lubrication and vascularity
  • 54.
     Cervical Sympathectomy Stellate ganglion block/ cervical chain block:  through an anterior paratracheal approach, 10-15 cc of 1 per cent xylocaine is injected slowly.  The success of the procedure is judged by the appearance of Horner’s syndrome, congestion of the ipsilateral tympanic membrane and congestion of the ipsilateral nasal mucosa.  It is reported that foetor and crusting are relieved within eight to 10 blocks and that this is maintained for up to four to eight days after cessation of blocks.  risk of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy
  • 55.
     Sublabial implantation:bone, cartilage, fat,placental bits, hydroxyapatite + fibrin paste,Plastipore, acrylic resin, silastic  Parotid duct implantation into maxillary sinus {Wittmack’s operation}
  • 56.
     Rhinitis Sicca Mild form of atrophic rhinitis Seen in hot, dry, dusty places (bakers, goldsmiths); alcoholics & anaemics  Crusting present anteriorly only  Bone atrophy & foetor are absent  Tx: Nasal douching + change of surrounding
  • 57.
     Rhinitis Caseosa Synonym: Nasal cholesteatoma  Chronic inflammation with deposition of foul smelling cheesy material in nasal cavity.  Nasal obstruction---stasis of secretions & exfoliated cells---putrefaction---caseation  Treatment: 1. Removal of cheesy debris  2. Correction of nasal obstruction
  • 58.
    REFERENCES  Scott brown7th edition  Dutt, S., & Kameswaran, M. (2005). The aetiology and management of atrophic rhinitis. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 119(11), 843-852. doi:10.1258/002221505774783377  Hazarika 3rd edition  Dhingra 6th edition