Ash edu 695 new week 3 individual wileyplus assignment,Ash edu 695 new week 3 dq 2,Ash edu 695 new week 3 dq 1,Ash edu 695 new week 3,ecet 370 week 3,Ash edu 695 new, ecet 370,Ash edu 695 new week 3 tutorial,ecet 370 week 3 assignment,Ash edu 695 new week 3 help

1. ASH EDU 695 Week 3 DQ 1 Critical Thinking
and Problem Solving NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.edu695assignment.com/edu-
695-ash/edu-695-week-3-dq-1-critical-
thinking-and-problem-solving-new
For more classes visit
http://www.edu695assignment.com
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
In Week Two, you created a presentation on why linking assessments with report
cards that reflect CCSS is imperative. In this discussion, you expand on your
knowledge about CCSS and debate the idea of whether creating high-quality
assessments is necessary. Note that some educators argue that it is not enough to
just create a link between assessments and report cards, but that assessments need
to be high level and should require students to synthesize their learning instead of
only demonstrating mastery by rote memory. Alternatively, some educators argue
that high-quality assessments cost more than lower quality assessments (Eisner,
2001; Matthews, 2006; Pulfrey, Buch, & Butera, 2011). One possible reason for this
viewpoint is that higher-level assessments often include performance tasks and/or
essays that require teacher scoring, and thus a great deal of time is spent on
evaluating students’ work. Conversely, lower-level assessments measuring basic
knowledge through multiple-choice and true/false responses; they can be measured
using technology and take considerably less time and resources to measure.

2. First, choose a side from the two opposing viewpoints described above and discuss
one of these two points:
a. Can the American education system afford assessments for deeper learning?
b. Can the American education system afford not to have such high-quality
assessments?
Next, discuss if it is necessary to share assessment items, rubrics and 21st-century
practices with fellow colleagues.
Guided Response: Respond to at least two peers. Find one peer who has the same
argument you chose and one peer who chose the viewpoint you did not. Debate how
your viewpoint is different. If your viewpoint is similar to that of your peers discuss
the similarities. Evaluate your peers’ responses to the use of multimedia resources
with regard to critical thinking and problem solving. Though two replies is the basic
expectation, for deeper engagement and learning, you are encouraged to provide
responses to any comments or questions others have given to you, including the
instructor. Responding to the replies given to you will further the conversation and
provide additional opportunities for you to demonstrate your content expertise,
critical thinking, and real-world experiences with this topic.