The document discusses the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) which establish clear expectations for student learning across all states. It focuses on the role of CCSS in schools. Teachers are asked to evaluate how CCSS in math and English can influence the use of technology-enhanced differentiated instructional strategies to support all learners. Purposeful planning of differentiated strategies is important to promote learning. Teachers are also asked to reflect on challenges in redesigning assignments to meet 21st century student outcomes and support systems.

1. ASH EDU 695 Week 2 DQ 1 Common Core State
Standards NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.edu695assignment.com/edu-695-
ash/edu-695-week-2-dq-1-common-core-state-
standards-new
For more classes visit
http://www.edu695assignment.com
www.edu695assign
ment.com
Common Core State Standards
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) establish
clear expectations for student learning and are the
standards for a set of learning for all students in
the United States regardless of geographic
location. This discussion is focused on CCSS and
the role these standards take in the school setting.
There are two parts to this discussion as
explained
below.

2. • Part One: First, in one paragraph, summarize
your understanding of the foundation of the CCSS
for Math and English Arts. Next, adopting the
perspective of a teacher leader, in at least two
paragraphs, evaluate how CCSS (Math and English
Language Arts) can be used to influence the use
of technology-enhanced differentiated
instructional strategies to support the needs of
all learners. Finally, in one paragraph, justify why
it is important to have purposeful planning of
differentiated instructional strategies to promote
student learning and provide at least one specific
example to support your justification.
W. Part Two: Include a link to your ePortfolio
(Pathbrite) in your initial post along with a one-
paragraph reflection about your experience with
the redesign for the Week One Assignment in
terms of challenges you encountered and how you
overcame those challenges. Be sure to include any
difficulties you experienced in revising to meet
the components of 21st century student outcomes
and 21st century support systems.
Guided Response: Respond to at least two peers.
In your responses, include a question about your
peer's technology-enhanced instructional
strategies and offer an additional resource that

3. supports an alternative viewpoint. Additionally,
discuss your peer's point of view and whether it is
in direct correlation or contrast to yours about the
CCSS. Finally, address your peer's discussion of the
challenges he or she faced in the redesign for the
Week One Assignment offering supportive ideas
for how your peer could overcome these
challenges for future redesigns in this course.
Though two replies is the basic expectation, for
deeper engagement and learning, you are
encouraged to provide responses to any
comments or questions others have given to you,
including the instructor. Responding to the replies
given to you will further the conversation and
provide additional opportunities for you to
demonstrate your content expertise, critical
thinking, and real-world experiences with this
topic.