The document discusses the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), which establish clear expectations for student learning across all US states. It focuses on the role of CCSS in schools. Teachers are asked to evaluate how CCSS in math and English can influence the use of technology-enhanced differentiated instructional strategies to support all learners. Purposeful planning of differentiated strategies is important to promote learning, and an example is requested. Participants are also asked to discuss challenges in redesigning an assignment and how they were overcome.

1. ASH EDU 695 Week 2 DQ 1 Common Core State
Standards NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.edu695assignment.com/edu-695-
ash/edu-695-week-2-dq-1-common-core-state-
standards-new
For more classes visit
http://www.edu695assignment.com
Common Core State Standards
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) establish
clear expectations for student learning and are the
standards for a set of learning for all students in
the United States regardless of geographic
location. This discussion is focused on CCSS and
the role these standards take in the school setting.
There are two parts to this discussion as explained
below.

2. • Part One: First, in one paragraph, summarize
your understanding of the foundation of the CCSS
for Math and English Arts. Next, adopting the
perspective of a teacher leader, in at least two
paragraphs, evaluate how CCSS (Math and English
Language Arts) can be used to influence the use of
technology-enhanced differentiated instructional
strategies to support the needs of all learners.
Finally, in one paragraph, justify why it is
important to have purposeful planning of
differentiated instructional strategies to promote
student learning and provide at least one specific
example to support your justification.
• Part Two: Include a link to your ePortfolio
(Pathbrite) in your initial post along with a one-
paragraph reflection about your experience with
the redesign for the Week One Assignment in
terms of challenges you encountered and how you
overcame those challenges. Be sure to include any
difficulties you experienced in revising to meet the
components of 21st century student outcomes and
21st century support systems.
Guided Response: Respond to at least two peers. In
your responses, include a question about your
peer’s technology-enhanced instructional
strategies and offer an additional resource that

3. supports an alternative viewpoint. Additionally,
discuss your peer’s point of view and whether it is
in direct correlation or contrast to yours about the
CCSS. Finally, address your peer’s discussion of the
challenges he or she faced in the redesign for the
Week One Assignment offering supportive ideas
for how your peer could overcome these
challenges for future redesigns in this course.
Though two replies is the basic expectation, for
deeper engagement and learning, you are
encouraged to provide responses to any comments
or questions others have given to you, including
the instructor. Responding to the replies given to
you will further the conversation and provide
additional opportunities for you to demonstrate
your content expertise, critical thinking, and real-
world experiences with this topic.