A strategic approach to publication
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•102 views
This document provides a strategic approach for publishing research. It recommends establishing a production line by prioritizing revisions over drafts and drafts over new manuscripts. The strategy also suggests aiming publications at a cluster of similar journals, following journal guidelines closely, and learning to write anywhere and everywhere. Additional tips include enhancing research quality and transparency, seeking criticism from a critical friend, and dealing with reviewer comments completely, politely, and with evidence.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Clinical research design
This document discusses key considerations for clinical research design such as having a clear research question, selecting an appropriate design that best answers the question, considering feasibility factors, ensuring the work is interesting, relevant, novel, and ethical. It provides examples of common research designs like randomized controlled trials, surveys, qualitative research, and systematic reviews. It highlights common mistakes like having an overly ambitious project or deciding on methods before the research question. The conclusion emphasizes having a clear research question to guide design, methods, and getting necessary support and approvals.
Instrument development and psychometric validation 030222
This document discusses instrument development and validation. It covers questionnaire design, including response formats and standardizing questions. It also discusses establishing validity through content validity, including item-content validity index and scale-content validity index. Other topics covered include reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, and factorial validity. The document also discusses screening questionnaires, sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and how they are used to optimize diagnostic accuracy when developing screening tools.
The research process steps
The document outlines the key steps in the research process, including developing the research project, reviewing literature, creating a research proposal, conducting a pilot study, and project management. It discusses developing a research question and aims, reviewing background literature and gaps, designing methodology, and plans for analysis, reporting, and writing up results. Methods of searching literature systematically using databases and evaluating sources are also covered. The importance of a pilot study and a clear timetable for the research proposal and project are emphasized.
How to Become More Involved in Peer Review
The document provides guidance on how to become more involved in peer review. It notes that there is a shortage of high quality peer reviewers due to increased demands on scientists' time and a lack of compensation. It recommends accepting review invitations whenever possible, notifying associate editors of one's review interests, and seeking advice from senior investigators when conducting reviews.
How to write an effective review (and help editors and authors)
This document provides guidance for writing effective peer reviews that can help editors and authors. It emphasizes that reviewing is an important scientific duty and responsibility shared between editors and reviewers. The document outlines steps reviewers should take, including diagnosing issues with the manuscript, providing treatment by suggesting ways to improve the manuscript through revisions, and drafting a review report that clearly communicates the diagnosis and suggested revisions. It advises reviewers to avoid being rude or imposing unnecessary demands and instead focus on providing constructive feedback to strengthen the manuscript.
What editor and reviewers wants?
Journal editors evaluate all manuscripts that are submitted to their journal, select those which they consider to be suitable for the journal to send for peer review, and consider peer reviewers’ advice to make a final decision about what gets published. Therefore, it is important to know how they make their decisions.
What Next: When You are not Funded on the First Round (2020)
Scott G. Filler, MD
Professor of Medicine at Lundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA and UCLA
Co-Leader, CTSI KL2 Institutional Development Core
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
William Parks, PhD, speaks on the topic of "How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Application" at the R Award Workshop on November 08, 2018 at UCLA.
Recommended
Clinical research design
This document discusses key considerations for clinical research design such as having a clear research question, selecting an appropriate design that best answers the question, considering feasibility factors, ensuring the work is interesting, relevant, novel, and ethical. It provides examples of common research designs like randomized controlled trials, surveys, qualitative research, and systematic reviews. It highlights common mistakes like having an overly ambitious project or deciding on methods before the research question. The conclusion emphasizes having a clear research question to guide design, methods, and getting necessary support and approvals.
Instrument development and psychometric validation 030222
This document discusses instrument development and validation. It covers questionnaire design, including response formats and standardizing questions. It also discusses establishing validity through content validity, including item-content validity index and scale-content validity index. Other topics covered include reliability, criterion validity, construct validity, and factorial validity. The document also discusses screening questionnaires, sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and how they are used to optimize diagnostic accuracy when developing screening tools.
The research process steps
The document outlines the key steps in the research process, including developing the research project, reviewing literature, creating a research proposal, conducting a pilot study, and project management. It discusses developing a research question and aims, reviewing background literature and gaps, designing methodology, and plans for analysis, reporting, and writing up results. Methods of searching literature systematically using databases and evaluating sources are also covered. The importance of a pilot study and a clear timetable for the research proposal and project are emphasized.
How to Become More Involved in Peer Review
The document provides guidance on how to become more involved in peer review. It notes that there is a shortage of high quality peer reviewers due to increased demands on scientists' time and a lack of compensation. It recommends accepting review invitations whenever possible, notifying associate editors of one's review interests, and seeking advice from senior investigators when conducting reviews.
How to write an effective review (and help editors and authors)
This document provides guidance for writing effective peer reviews that can help editors and authors. It emphasizes that reviewing is an important scientific duty and responsibility shared between editors and reviewers. The document outlines steps reviewers should take, including diagnosing issues with the manuscript, providing treatment by suggesting ways to improve the manuscript through revisions, and drafting a review report that clearly communicates the diagnosis and suggested revisions. It advises reviewers to avoid being rude or imposing unnecessary demands and instead focus on providing constructive feedback to strengthen the manuscript.
What editor and reviewers wants?
Journal editors evaluate all manuscripts that are submitted to their journal, select those which they consider to be suitable for the journal to send for peer review, and consider peer reviewers’ advice to make a final decision about what gets published. Therefore, it is important to know how they make their decisions.
What Next: When You are not Funded on the First Round (2020)
Scott G. Filler, MD
Professor of Medicine at Lundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA and UCLA
Co-Leader, CTSI KL2 Institutional Development Core
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
William Parks, PhD, speaks on the topic of "How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Application" at the R Award Workshop on November 08, 2018 at UCLA.
K-to-R Workshop: How to Structure the "Approach" Section (Part 1)
UCLA CTSI K-to_R Workshop, October 29, 2015
Presenter:
David Elashoff, PhD
Professor of Biostatistics & Medicine
Program Leader, CTSI Biostatistics and Computational Biology
What do we want to see addressed by a reviewer?
The document outlines what a reviewer should address when reviewing a manuscript, including evaluating the context and content of the manuscript. For context, the reviewer should assess if the manuscript is presented appropriately within published literature, is novel, and integrates findings into existing knowledge. For content, the reviewer should consider if the study design, methods, models, and analyses are appropriate and if results and conclusions are convincing and supported by evidence presented. The reviewer does not need to worry about spelling, grammar, or editorial guidelines.
Non academic clinical researcher
This document discusses how to pursue academic research as an orthopaedic surgeon outside of a university setting. It encourages developing a research question that is interesting and unanswered. Initial steps include learning statistics, conducting a literature review, and getting help from mentors. Securing funding may involve grants, philanthropy, or commercial support. Disseminating findings through publications and presentations helps advance evidence-based practice. With passion, focus, and persistence, the document argues that successful clinical research is possible outside a university.
Presenting your Research at the ECTEL Doctoral Consortium
Over the last four years of reviewing for the ECTEL Doctoral Consortium board I came across pretty much the same problems every year. This presentation condenses some recommendations that Ph.D. candidates should consider when putting a submission together. I hope this also helps for submissions to other doctoral consortia.
York EBSC NSCA July 2009
Presentation to NSCA conference in Las Vegas July 2009 on a practical, evidence-based approach to strength and conditioning.
Do Citations and Readership Predict Excellent Publications?
This document discusses research into whether current metrics like citations and readership are sufficient to identify highly influential papers. The authors created a dataset of 314 papers labeled as either seminal works or survey papers based on a questionnaire. They then used this dataset to classify papers based on citations and readership, finding that citations provided a somewhat better prediction of influence than readership alone. However, neither metric was deemed optimal. The authors conclude that an ideal dataset and alternative metrics that examine citation context and content are needed to better measure research impact.
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application by William Parks, PhD
William Parks, PhD, speaks on the topic of "A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application" at the R Award Workshop on November 08, 2018 at UCLA.
Jcdl2017 Poster
The document summarizes a pilot study on researchers' perceptions of open peer review (OPR) in the era of open science. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven STEM faculty and researchers. The interviews explored participants' awareness and views of OPR, willingness to publish peer review reports and sign reviews, and opinions on shifting from blind to open peer review. While some were open to OPR, others had concerns about transparency. Due to the small sample size, no definitive conclusions could be drawn, but future larger studies are needed to understand adoption of OPR across fields.
I conf2016
Emerging open peer review journals in scientific publishing, transparency in peer review ......
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/89432
تحليل البيانات وتفسير المعطيات
The document discusses data analysis and negative results in scientific research. It provides examples of how negative results are underreported but still provide valuable information. It emphasizes that negative results:
1) Prevent wasted efforts on experiments that already failed,
2) Help identify false conclusions by focusing only on positive results, and
3) Can still provide important evidence against hypotheses or support the null hypothesis. Examples show how negative results advanced scientific understanding. The document argues negative results should receive the same rigorous interpretation and publication consideration as positive results.
Burger_SSIB_Open_Sci_NutriXiv_7_2019_draft
This document provides an overview of open science practices to increase rigor and reproducibility in research. It begins with a discussion of current challenges to rigor, including an overemphasis on metrics, not publishing null findings, and a lack of replication. It then outlines several open science practices like pre-registration, open materials and methods, transparent statistics and data visualization, and open data. Benefits of these practices include reducing biases like p-hacking and increasing transparency, replication, and collaboration. Concerns include increased workload and losing proprietary advantages. Overall the presentation aims to promote discussion of adopting open science practices to strengthen the quality of research.
How to Anticipate and Plan for an R Grant Application
UCLA CTSI K-to_R Workshop, October 29, 2015
Presenter:
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, CTSI Research Education, Training and Career Development
10 Common Mistakes in Research Articles
The document outlines 10 common mistakes made in research articles, including choosing the wrong journal for the topic, having an incomplete or outdated literature review that lacks analysis, asking research questions not tied to the literature review, using the wrong research method or having an incomplete methods section, drawing conclusions not tied to the results, and having poor or incomplete writing. It also provides advice to focus research on mechanisms of online learning, apply pre-Internet theories, consider cost-effectiveness and consequences of online learning, and to structure articles with 1/3 on literature, 1/3 on methodology, and 1/3 on results and discussion.
Academic Corruption and Misconduct
This document discusses various forms of academic misconduct including fabrication of data, cherry picking results, and harking. It notes that misconduct leads to artificially strong positive results and positive publication bias. Examples of misconduct include plagiarism, double publication, and undeserved authorship. Trends show misconduct is increasing as evidenced by rising retraction rates and disappearing negative results. Those who engage in misconduct tend to be highly respected researchers who publish proficiently and quickly. Potential remedies include improved mentoring, blinded data assessment, and strong leadership.
Approaches to Peer Review
Peer review is the most widely accepted model for setting a threshold of published scholarly material. With the move to digital publishing, it has come under attack with suggestions that it is 'broken', overloading reviewers and possibly no longer fit for purpose. This presentation discusses the challenges for peer review and some emerging new models. Ultimately, we may need to take a step back to ask what peer review is for and how these aims can best be achieved. Video available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YMla0Uc5ZE&x-yt-ts=1422327029&x-yt-cl=84838260
Publish and submit
This document provides guidance for writing and publishing academic manuscripts. It discusses challenges authors may face including lack of familiarity with the publication process and becoming discouraged. It also discusses challenges with journals like space constraints and editorial priorities. The document provides tips for different sections of a manuscript like the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. It discusses referencing styles, matching manuscripts to appropriate journals, common reasons for rejection, and benefits of open access publishing for both authors and readers.
Publishing in ajp lung 4 21
This document provides guidance on publishing research in the journal AJP-Lung. It discusses the importance of publication for career advancement and continued funding. It outlines best practices for authorship, including determining author order and meeting authorship criteria. The submission and review process is described, including timelines, criteria for acceptance/rejection, and responding to reviewer feedback. Ethical issues in publishing like plagiarism, data fabrication, and authorship disputes are also covered. The document aims to help researchers successfully publish their work in AJP-Lung.
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
William Parks, PhD, speaks on the topic of "How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Application" at the R Award Workshop on November 09, 2017 at UCLA.
Viva questions
The document contains questions that were obtained by the author while attending doctoral school in 2002/2003. The questions cover several topics related to conducting PhD research including: the background and motivation for undertaking a PhD; developing the research question and theoretical framework; choosing a research methodology; conducting fieldwork and data analysis; presenting research results; and evaluating the value and limitations of the research. The questions provide a guide for PhD students to help structure their research and prepare for their thesis defense.
Grade 9, U0-L2B Nature of Science
Science is built on evidence from the natural world, but this evidence can be confusing or conflicting at times. Each new discovery tends to lead to more questions than answers. The scientific process is complex and non-linear, not a simple progression from hypothesis to conclusion. Hypotheses are predictions for experiments that require logically reasoned background knowledge. The scientific method involves manipulating an independent variable while measuring its effect on a dependent variable, while controlling for other influences through constant variables.
The path to publication
The document discusses the path to publication in academic journals. It covers the peer review process, which includes submission, blind or open peer review, potential reasons for rejection, revisions, and post-publication scrutiny. Barriers to writing are addressed, such as deciding one's motivation and applying strategies like writing daily without planning and seeking feedback. Guidelines for international journals are also reviewed, including adherence to standards like CONSORT, PRISMA, COPE and ICMJE. The importance of completely, politely and evidence-based responses to reviewer comments is emphasized.
Langauge of the research
This document provides guidance on writing a thesis or research paper. It discusses structure, substance, style, verbs, and avoiding anthropomorphism. For substance, it recommends beginning with a clear structure, writing with the reader in mind, and revising over multiple drafts. It provides tips for style such as using formal language, avoiding ambiguity, and employing appropriate punctuation. Regarding verbs, it suggests using the present, past, and present perfect tenses accurately depending on whether referring to established facts, methods, data, or previous studies. The document cautions against attributing human characteristics to non-human subjects.
More Related Content
What's hot
K-to-R Workshop: How to Structure the "Approach" Section (Part 1)
UCLA CTSI K-to_R Workshop, October 29, 2015
Presenter:
David Elashoff, PhD
Professor of Biostatistics & Medicine
Program Leader, CTSI Biostatistics and Computational Biology
What do we want to see addressed by a reviewer?
The document outlines what a reviewer should address when reviewing a manuscript, including evaluating the context and content of the manuscript. For context, the reviewer should assess if the manuscript is presented appropriately within published literature, is novel, and integrates findings into existing knowledge. For content, the reviewer should consider if the study design, methods, models, and analyses are appropriate and if results and conclusions are convincing and supported by evidence presented. The reviewer does not need to worry about spelling, grammar, or editorial guidelines.
Non academic clinical researcher
This document discusses how to pursue academic research as an orthopaedic surgeon outside of a university setting. It encourages developing a research question that is interesting and unanswered. Initial steps include learning statistics, conducting a literature review, and getting help from mentors. Securing funding may involve grants, philanthropy, or commercial support. Disseminating findings through publications and presentations helps advance evidence-based practice. With passion, focus, and persistence, the document argues that successful clinical research is possible outside a university.
Presenting your Research at the ECTEL Doctoral Consortium
Over the last four years of reviewing for the ECTEL Doctoral Consortium board I came across pretty much the same problems every year. This presentation condenses some recommendations that Ph.D. candidates should consider when putting a submission together. I hope this also helps for submissions to other doctoral consortia.
York EBSC NSCA July 2009
Presentation to NSCA conference in Las Vegas July 2009 on a practical, evidence-based approach to strength and conditioning.
Do Citations and Readership Predict Excellent Publications?
This document discusses research into whether current metrics like citations and readership are sufficient to identify highly influential papers. The authors created a dataset of 314 papers labeled as either seminal works or survey papers based on a questionnaire. They then used this dataset to classify papers based on citations and readership, finding that citations provided a somewhat better prediction of influence than readership alone. However, neither metric was deemed optimal. The authors conclude that an ideal dataset and alternative metrics that examine citation context and content are needed to better measure research impact.
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application by William Parks, PhD
William Parks, PhD, speaks on the topic of "A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application" at the R Award Workshop on November 08, 2018 at UCLA.
Jcdl2017 Poster
The document summarizes a pilot study on researchers' perceptions of open peer review (OPR) in the era of open science. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven STEM faculty and researchers. The interviews explored participants' awareness and views of OPR, willingness to publish peer review reports and sign reviews, and opinions on shifting from blind to open peer review. While some were open to OPR, others had concerns about transparency. Due to the small sample size, no definitive conclusions could be drawn, but future larger studies are needed to understand adoption of OPR across fields.
I conf2016
Emerging open peer review journals in scientific publishing, transparency in peer review ......
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/89432
تحليل البيانات وتفسير المعطيات
The document discusses data analysis and negative results in scientific research. It provides examples of how negative results are underreported but still provide valuable information. It emphasizes that negative results:
1) Prevent wasted efforts on experiments that already failed,
2) Help identify false conclusions by focusing only on positive results, and
3) Can still provide important evidence against hypotheses or support the null hypothesis. Examples show how negative results advanced scientific understanding. The document argues negative results should receive the same rigorous interpretation and publication consideration as positive results.
Burger_SSIB_Open_Sci_NutriXiv_7_2019_draft
This document provides an overview of open science practices to increase rigor and reproducibility in research. It begins with a discussion of current challenges to rigor, including an overemphasis on metrics, not publishing null findings, and a lack of replication. It then outlines several open science practices like pre-registration, open materials and methods, transparent statistics and data visualization, and open data. Benefits of these practices include reducing biases like p-hacking and increasing transparency, replication, and collaboration. Concerns include increased workload and losing proprietary advantages. Overall the presentation aims to promote discussion of adopting open science practices to strengthen the quality of research.
How to Anticipate and Plan for an R Grant Application
UCLA CTSI K-to_R Workshop, October 29, 2015
Presenter:
Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH
Barbara A. Levey MD & Gerald S. Levey MD Endowed Chair
Professor of Medicine and Public Health at UCLA
Associate Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Program Leader, CTSI Research Education, Training and Career Development
10 Common Mistakes in Research Articles
The document outlines 10 common mistakes made in research articles, including choosing the wrong journal for the topic, having an incomplete or outdated literature review that lacks analysis, asking research questions not tied to the literature review, using the wrong research method or having an incomplete methods section, drawing conclusions not tied to the results, and having poor or incomplete writing. It also provides advice to focus research on mechanisms of online learning, apply pre-Internet theories, consider cost-effectiveness and consequences of online learning, and to structure articles with 1/3 on literature, 1/3 on methodology, and 1/3 on results and discussion.
Academic Corruption and Misconduct
This document discusses various forms of academic misconduct including fabrication of data, cherry picking results, and harking. It notes that misconduct leads to artificially strong positive results and positive publication bias. Examples of misconduct include plagiarism, double publication, and undeserved authorship. Trends show misconduct is increasing as evidenced by rising retraction rates and disappearing negative results. Those who engage in misconduct tend to be highly respected researchers who publish proficiently and quickly. Potential remedies include improved mentoring, blinded data assessment, and strong leadership.
Approaches to Peer Review
Peer review is the most widely accepted model for setting a threshold of published scholarly material. With the move to digital publishing, it has come under attack with suggestions that it is 'broken', overloading reviewers and possibly no longer fit for purpose. This presentation discusses the challenges for peer review and some emerging new models. Ultimately, we may need to take a step back to ask what peer review is for and how these aims can best be achieved. Video available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YMla0Uc5ZE&x-yt-ts=1422327029&x-yt-cl=84838260
Publish and submit
This document provides guidance for writing and publishing academic manuscripts. It discusses challenges authors may face including lack of familiarity with the publication process and becoming discouraged. It also discusses challenges with journals like space constraints and editorial priorities. The document provides tips for different sections of a manuscript like the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. It discusses referencing styles, matching manuscripts to appropriate journals, common reasons for rejection, and benefits of open access publishing for both authors and readers.
Publishing in ajp lung 4 21
This document provides guidance on publishing research in the journal AJP-Lung. It discusses the importance of publication for career advancement and continued funding. It outlines best practices for authorship, including determining author order and meeting authorship criteria. The submission and review process is described, including timelines, criteria for acceptance/rejection, and responding to reviewer feedback. Ethical issues in publishing like plagiarism, data fabrication, and authorship disputes are also covered. The document aims to help researchers successfully publish their work in AJP-Lung.
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
William Parks, PhD, speaks on the topic of "How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Application" at the R Award Workshop on November 09, 2017 at UCLA.
Viva questions
The document contains questions that were obtained by the author while attending doctoral school in 2002/2003. The questions cover several topics related to conducting PhD research including: the background and motivation for undertaking a PhD; developing the research question and theoretical framework; choosing a research methodology; conducting fieldwork and data analysis; presenting research results; and evaluating the value and limitations of the research. The questions provide a guide for PhD students to help structure their research and prepare for their thesis defense.
Grade 9, U0-L2B Nature of Science
Science is built on evidence from the natural world, but this evidence can be confusing or conflicting at times. Each new discovery tends to lead to more questions than answers. The scientific process is complex and non-linear, not a simple progression from hypothesis to conclusion. Hypotheses are predictions for experiments that require logically reasoned background knowledge. The scientific method involves manipulating an independent variable while measuring its effect on a dependent variable, while controlling for other influences through constant variables.
What's hot (20)
K-to-R Workshop: How to Structure the "Approach" Section (Part 1)
K-to-R Workshop: How to Structure the "Approach" Section (Part 1)
Presenting your Research at the ECTEL Doctoral Consortium
Presenting your Research at the ECTEL Doctoral Consortium
Do Citations and Readership Predict Excellent Publications?
Do Citations and Readership Predict Excellent Publications?
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application by William Parks, PhD
A Tactical Approach to Writing Your Grant Application by William Parks, PhD
How to Anticipate and Plan for an R Grant Application
How to Anticipate and Plan for an R Grant Application
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
How to Craft the "Significance” & "Innovation" Sections of a Grant Applicatio...
Similar to A strategic approach to publication
The path to publication
The document discusses the path to publication in academic journals. It covers the peer review process, which includes submission, blind or open peer review, potential reasons for rejection, revisions, and post-publication scrutiny. Barriers to writing are addressed, such as deciding one's motivation and applying strategies like writing daily without planning and seeking feedback. Guidelines for international journals are also reviewed, including adherence to standards like CONSORT, PRISMA, COPE and ICMJE. The importance of completely, politely and evidence-based responses to reviewer comments is emphasized.
Langauge of the research
This document provides guidance on writing a thesis or research paper. It discusses structure, substance, style, verbs, and avoiding anthropomorphism. For substance, it recommends beginning with a clear structure, writing with the reader in mind, and revising over multiple drafts. It provides tips for style such as using formal language, avoiding ambiguity, and employing appropriate punctuation. Regarding verbs, it suggests using the present, past, and present perfect tenses accurately depending on whether referring to established facts, methods, data, or previous studies. The document cautions against attributing human characteristics to non-human subjects.
Inden 2017: Publishing tips and future directions
This document provides tips and guidance for writing publications. It discusses understanding the publishing process, writing for editors, reviewers, and audiences. The four main rules of writing discussed are to read guidelines, set word count targets, seek criticism from others, and view rejections as opportunities to resubmit. Guidelines for various journals and standards for research are referenced. Tips for international relevance, dealing with revisions, and responding to reviewer comments in a complete, polite, and evidence-based manner are provided. Metrics for evaluating impact including altmetrics and the relationship between social media mentions and citations are briefly discussed.
Survey Methodology and Questionnaire Design Theory Part II
This document provides best practices for questionnaire design, including response options, question wording, and question order. Some key points:
- Open-ended questions are preferred when the possible answers are unknown, but have drawbacks like more time and coding required.
- Use 7-point scales for bipolar constructs and 5-point scales for unipolar. Include middle alternatives and branching for more nuanced responses.
- Construct-specific scales are better than generic scales. Label all scale points for clarity.
- Carefully word questions to be simple, direct, specific, and avoid bias. Pre-test questions.
- Consider using existing validated questions if applicable, but pre-test to ensure
Workshop -- How to successfully write a scientific paper?
Přednášející: Katarzyna Gaca-Zając, PhD Eng. | Elsevier
***********
Během školení se jeho účastníci naučí úspěšně napsat kvalitní vědecký článek, který bude korespondovat s vědeckou komunitou a umožní jeho autorům získat uznání. Představeny budou osvědčené postupy, které jsou založeny na zkušenostech výzkumných pracovníků, redaktorů a čtenářů. Školení je určeno především začínajícím výzkumným pracovníkům, vítáni jsou ale všichni vědečtí pracovníci a akademici.
**********
During this training the attendees will learn how to successfully write a good quality research paper, which will resonate well with the scientific community and will allow them to gain recognition. A summary of the best practices in writing will be presented and these are based on experience of researchers, editors and readers. The training is addressed primarily to young researchers, although senior academics are also welcome to attend.
Making your research and teaching more efficient, transparent and impactful
Science is hard and keeping up with the latest changes in technology and research practices can feel overwhelming. This workshop is designed to increase your productivity by making your research and teaching more efficient, transparent, and impactful. This will introduce you to a wide variety of strategies and technologies that you can employ in your work.
How and when to publish
This document provides guidance on managing the publication process and developing writing skills for publication. It discusses understanding publishing guidelines, seeking feedback on writing, responding to reviewer comments, promoting research integrity, preventing plagiarism, and developing an online presence. The key steps are to understand the publisher's guidelines, write with the intended audience and reviewers in mind, seek criticism from others, and be polite and evidence-based when responding to reviewer feedback.
Publishing in academic journals medicine and health
The document provides guidance for publishing medical research in academic journals, outlining key considerations for choosing a journal such as scope, audience, and impact, as well as discussing open access models, challenges with predatory journals, and best practices for writing and submitting manuscripts for peer review.
From thesis to academic papers
This document provides 10 tips for publishing academic papers based on a thesis. The tips include planning publications with supervisors, determining the number and topics of papers, selecting suitable journals, creating an outline for each paper, heavily editing content from the thesis, focusing on methods, findings and discussion sections before literature reviews and abstracts, using tables to reduce word counts when possible, carefully editing qualitative data, references, and tables, understanding the publishing process and expectations, and persisting through potential rejections. The overall goal is to disseminate research findings and strengthen one's career by publishing parts of the thesis.
Preparing for your viva voce dissertation defence.
The document provides 12 tips for preparing for and passing a PhD viva voce exam. It recommends practicing your presentation for a mock audience, researching your examiners, having a clear structure for your presentation, anticipating difficult questions, and revisiting feedback on your thesis. Additionally, it suggests arriving well-prepared with an expert-level understanding of your thesis, maintaining confidence even if you don't know an answer, and dressing professionally. The overall goal is to demonstrate expertise in your research area and pass the oral defense of your dissertation.
Reviewing an Article, What do reviewers look for in an original article.pdf
Peer reviewers play an important role in evaluating research articles submitted for publication. Reviewers look for originality, scientific merit, quality writing, and relevance. The document outlines the peer review process and provides tips for both authors and reviewers. For authors, presenting a well-organized article with clear writing can help address reviewer comments and improve chances of acceptance. Reviewers should provide constructive feedback within their area of expertise while maintaining confidentiality and disclosing conflicts of interest. Journals are recognizing reviewer contributions to help improve the peer review system.
How to Review a Manuscript (By Elesvier)
This document provides guidance on conducting a manuscript review. It discusses how to determine if you are qualified to review a manuscript, how to conduct the review, what to include in the review report such as summarizing the manuscript and providing constructive feedback, and making a recommendation. It also describes tools and resources available to help with the reviewing process such as training, online editorial systems, and how to get help if needed.
Through the eyes of the editor: nursing research
This document summarizes key points about the publishing process for nursing research. It discusses the importance of quality assurance, understanding journal guidelines, seeking feedback on writing, and responding thoroughly and politely to reviewer comments. Revisions are expected, and authors should learn when to accept that their work is ready for publication. Overall it provides guidance on writing for publication to enhance the quality and transparency of health research.
Understanding scientific peer review
This document discusses the history and process of scientific peer review. It begins by outlining some of the earliest documented uses of peer review in the 9th century by Ishaq bin Ali Al-Rahawi and in the 18th century by the Royal Society of London. It then describes how peer review evolved in the early 1900s in scientific journals and was facilitated by the introduction of photocopiers. The document outlines different peer review systems and their advantages and disadvantages. It also discusses ways to improve peer review, including the roles of authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers. Overall, the document provides a high-level overview of the development and current state of scientific peer review.
What do we mean by critical analysis
This document provides guidance on enhancing research skills, including properly scoping a research project, understanding the problem domain, applying critical analysis, and writing critically. It emphasizes the importance of identifying the problem domain, assessing one's position within it, and knowing when to conclude research due to time constraints. The document also offers tips for critical writing, such as focusing on a clear research question, presenting evidence and conclusions balanced with limitations, and structuring work through literature review, methodology, findings, and conclusions. Overall, it stresses questioning all aspects of the research and avoiding mismatches between questions, methods, findings, and conclusions.
Writing Your Thesis/Disseration
This presentation looks at some of the presenting issues for Third-Level students who are studying for a Masters Degree or Doctorate. It has a particular focus on the 'adult' learner or 'mature student'.
Persuasive presentation power point
This document discusses elements of persuasive presentations. It defines persuasive presentations as messages that influence audiences by changing their responses to ideas, issues, or products. It outlines three types of persuasive speeches: to inspire feelings/motivations, to convince beliefs/attitudes, and to influence behaviors/actions. The document also discusses Toulmin's model of argument construction, common fallacies to avoid, and organizational patterns for persuasive speeches like problem-solution, logical reasons, and criteria-satisfaction.
Getting Funded: Where to Begin and What to Consider
Steven M. Dubinett,
Director, UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute
Associate Vice Chancellor for Research
Senior Associate Dean for Translational Research
What do we mean by critical analysis?
This document discusses enhancing research skills, focusing on problem domains, critical analysis, and conducting academic research. It provides guidance on scoping a research project by identifying the problem domain, assessing your position within it, and knowing when to conclude research. Researchers should build upon existing work through critical analysis and replicate, apply, or extend prior studies. The document also offers tips for critical writing, including focusing on a clear question, justifying your position, providing evidence, and writing balanced conclusions. Structure, questioning assumptions, and considering limitations and ethics are emphasized.
Mastering the Test – Winning Test Taking Strategies
Learning Objective: Investigate test-taking skills to achieve higher assessment scores
Being prepared for tests is not an easy process. Even if you are prepared, tests can still make you feel anxious. Why is being a good test taker so important in college? In colleges and universities, much of a student’s grades are based on quiz and test performance. Doing well on these tests is typically a major indicator on your subject matter knowledge and a good indicator of how you would perform in the workplace. Having good test scores will jumpstart your career. In this seminar, we will address test-taking and test preparation tips and strategies for college-level tests. Applying helpful test-taking and test preparation skills addressed in this seminar, such as writing down everything you remember, reading the directions, browsing the test questions, putting together a plan, and making an educated guess, will teach you how to prepare for and perform well on any test so that you feel confident that you’re bringing your testing A-game.
At the end of this seminar, participants will be able to:
a. Review the factors that limit achieving higher college assessment scores.
b. Identify practices for dealing with test anxiety.
c. Measure current test-taking methods’ validity.
d. Generate more efficient techniques for improving assessment scores.
Similar to A strategic approach to publication (20)
Survey Methodology and Questionnaire Design Theory Part II
Survey Methodology and Questionnaire Design Theory Part II
Workshop -- How to successfully write a scientific paper?
Workshop -- How to successfully write a scientific paper?
Making your research and teaching more efficient, transparent and impactful
Making your research and teaching more efficient, transparent and impactful
Publishing in academic journals medicine and health
Publishing in academic journals medicine and health
Preparing for your viva voce dissertation defence.
Preparing for your viva voce dissertation defence.
Reviewing an Article, What do reviewers look for in an original article.pdf
Reviewing an Article, What do reviewers look for in an original article.pdf
Getting Funded: Where to Begin and What to Consider
Getting Funded: Where to Begin and What to Consider
Mastering the Test – Winning Test Taking Strategies
Mastering the Test – Winning Test Taking Strategies
More from Roger Watson
Research into mealtimes and older people with dementia.pptx
This document discusses research into helping older people with dementia during mealtimes. Dementia can cause problems with intelligence, memory, language, wandering, aggression and more. It also discusses the ethical issues around feeding those with dementia. The Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia scale is presented as the most widely used and validated measure of feeding difficulty. Several studies testing interventions like music or Montessori-based activities found positive outcomes, though more rigorous research is still needed. Spaced retrieval training was found to reduce mealtime difficulties and promote independence. Creating the right environment, social interactions and individualized care can help prolong eating ability in dementia patients.
Research into mealtimes and older people with dementia
This document discusses research into helping older people with dementia during mealtimes. Dementia can cause problems with intelligence, memory, language, wandering, aggression and more. It also raises ethical questions around feeding. The Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia scale is presented as the most validated measure of feeding difficulty. Several studies testing interventions like music or Montessori-based activities found positive outcomes, though more rigorous research is still needed. Factors like environment, social interaction and individualizing care can help promote independence in feeding for longer. Spaced retrieval training also showed promise in reducing mealtime difficulties. While numbers of those with dementia will rise, targeted interventions may help alleviate associated problems like eating.
Manuscript organisation
This document provides tips for organizing a manuscript. It recommends including sections for the title, abstract, introduction/background, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion, followed by references. The abstract should be structured and summarize the aims, background, design, methods, results, and conclusions. Keywords should match the title and abstract. The introduction should place the study in context and state the problem and research questions. The methods should describe the design, sample, data collection, and analysis in enough detail to allow replication. The results should report findings without interpretation. The discussion should interpret the results in relation to the research questions and implications. The conclusion should briefly summarize key findings and implications for future research.
How to be a good supervisor
This document provides guidance for supervisors on best practices for supporting PhD candidates. It outlines criteria for good supervision, including: recruiting and selecting candidates; developing strong supervisory relationships; supporting candidates' research projects and writing; keeping the research on track; and helping candidates develop professionally and disseminate their research. The document emphasizes establishing clear expectations, providing feedback on written work, dealing constructively with challenges, and reflecting on one's practice to continually enhance supervision skills.
Alternative experimental designs
The document discusses various alternative experimental designs for clinical research studies, including quasi-experiments, cohort studies, case control studies, pragmatic trials, non-inferiority trials, and studies of complex interventions. Traditional randomized controlled trials are described as well as their key features of randomization, control groups, blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. Cluster randomized trials and differences from individual randomized trials are also covered.
Clinical research ethics and regulation
This document discusses several topics related to clinical research ethics and regulation, including ethical principles, privacy and confidentiality, research data management, research ethics, research misconduct, publication ethics, and informed consent. The four main ethical principles discussed are beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. The document also covers topics such as anonymization, conflicts of interest, the Committee on Publication Ethics, and regulations around informed consent.
Effective online teaching
The document discusses effective online teaching. It begins by defining online learning as courses offered over the internet that are 100% virtual, excluding MOOCs. It states online learning should be innovative, granular, varied, interactive, and interesting. Blended learning combines online and in-person elements. The document outlines synchronous learning, which occurs in real-time, and asynchronous learning, which is flexible and self-paced. It provides strategies for asynchronous learning and notes online teaching requires front-loading work and new skills from instructors.
Global health & nursing
Global nursing aims to promote sustainable planetary health and equity for all people through an evidence-based nursing process. It considers social determinants of health and includes individual, population-level care, research, education, leadership, advocacy and policy initiatives. Global nurses engage ethically and respect human dignity, rights and diversity, partnering with communities and other providers.
Effective online teaching
Looks at online teaching generally and more specifically at asynchronous delivery of online programmes and modules
Open access, predatory journals and open science
Explains open access and other aspects of open science and the rise of predatory publishers and how to avoid them.
Publication ethics
Covers the six main aspects of publishing ethics: duplication, plagiarism, falsification, fabrication, authorship, conflict of interest
Better writing techniques
Inexperienced writers often struggle with presenting simple concepts clearly. They tend to use sentences that are too long with too many ideas, poor grammar, and sentence structure. As a result, the point is lost by the time the reader reaches the end of the sentence. They also make mistakes using single sentence paragraphs. Effective writing requires using shorter, clearer sentences and varying paragraph length.
Organising a manuscript
This document provides guidance on organizing a manuscript for publication. It discusses key elements like the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and conclusion sections. For the title, it recommends being short and clearly related to the topic. The abstract should be structured with aims, background, design, methods, results and conclusions. It also discusses writing clear research questions or hypotheses in the introduction. The methods section should describe the design, sample, data collection and analysis. The results section states the findings without discussion. The discussion section interprets the results in relation to the research questions and implications. The conclusion briefly summarizes the key points and implications.
The four rules of writing
This document provides guidance on writing for publication. It discusses common motivations for writing such as career progression or sharing research findings. It emphasizes that the main barriers to writing are a lack of reading and writing. To overcome these barriers, the document recommends reading widely from various genres and writing regularly and frequently. It also suggests setting word count targets, seeking feedback, and treating rejections as opportunities to improve for future submissions. The overall message is that regular writing and revising are essential skills for any writer.
The publishing process
The document discusses the publishing process for the journal Nurse Education in Practice. It provides information about the journal's international editorial board, publication frequency, and impact factor. It outlines what types of papers are most likely to contribute to the journal's impact factor, such as review papers, methodological papers, and original research. The document also discusses the aims and scope of the journal, the double-blind peer review process, guidelines for enhancing quality and transparency in health research, authorship standards, and reasons for article retraction such as plagiarism or duplicate publication.
Tweeting and blogging
This document discusses effective use of social media, particularly Twitter and blogging. It provides tips for using Twitter productively, such as including links, pictures, hashtags, and retweeting interesting material while avoiding trivia and offensive posts. Regarding blogging, it defines blogs and differentiates them from websites and pages. It also describes common blog post types and who typically blogs. Habits of effective bloggers are outlined as well, such as being prolific, concise, analytical, and lifelong learners who plan ahead. The document stresses developing a strategy for social media and promoting work professionally and responsibly.
Writing for different purposes
The document discusses different types of writing such as academic, scientific, journalistic, and literary. It provides tips for clear writing such as using simple words and active verbs. George Orwell's five rules for effective writing are presented which include using short words, cutting unnecessary words, using the active voice, and avoiding foreign phrases.
Philosophy in nursing: what have the Romans ever done for us?
About the place of philosophy in nursing - a non-philosophical point of view - delivered at Worcester University Nursing Philosophy Conference 2017
Haiku
This document provides an overview of haiku, a short form of Japanese poetry. It discusses some key aspects of haiku such as having 3 lines with a seasonal reference, focusing on moments or observations of nature, and following a syllable structure of 5-7-5. Examples of haikus are provided from various poets to illustrate common themes, devices, and styles in haiku poetry. Background information is also given on some famous haiku poets such as Matsuo Basho and the development of haiku as a poetic form in Japan.
Best practice in text re-cycling
Plagiarism, duplication and salami-slicing explained within an ethical framework of best practice in academic publishing delivered online to Pakistani nurses forum 2020
More from Roger Watson (20)
Research into mealtimes and older people with dementia.pptx
Research into mealtimes and older people with dementia.pptx
Research into mealtimes and older people with dementia
Research into mealtimes and older people with dementia
Philosophy in nursing: what have the Romans ever done for us?
Philosophy in nursing: what have the Romans ever done for us?
Recently uploaded
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...
Overall life span (LS) was 1671.7±1721.6 days and cumulative 5YS reached 62.4%, 10 years – 50.4%, 20 years – 44.6%. 94 LCP lived more than 5 years without cancer (LS=2958.6±1723.6 days), 22 – more than 10 years (LS=5571±1841.8 days). 67 LCP died because of LC (LS=471.9±344 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68% vs. 53.7%) (P=0.028 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: N0-N12, T3-4, blood cell circuit, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells-CC and blood cells subpopulations), LC cell dynamics, recalcification time, heparin tolerance, prothrombin index, protein, AT, procedure type (P=0.000-0.031). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and N0-12 (rank=1), thrombocytes/CC (rank=2), segmented neutrophils/CC (3), eosinophils/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), leucocytes/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (error=0.000; area under ROC curve=1.0).
Role of Mukta Pishti in the Management of Hyperthyroidism
Muktapishti is a traditional Ayurvedic preparation made from Shoditha Mukta (Purified Pearl), is believed to help regulate thyroid function and reduce symptoms of hyperthyroidism due to its cooling and balancing properties. Clinical evidence on its efficacy remains limited, necessitating further research to validate its therapeutic benefits.
Journal Article Review on Rasamanikya
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
Top Effective Soaps for Fungal Skin Infections in India
Swisschem Dermacare has mentioned the List of The Best Antifungal Soap In India 2022. All of these soaps are trusted by various Dermatology Experts.
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a simplified look into the mechanisms involved in the regulation of respiration:
Learning objectives:
1. Describe the organisation of respiratory center
2. Describe the nervous control of inspiration and respiratory rhythm
3. Describe the functions of the dorsal and respiratory groups of neurons
4. Describe the influences of the Pneumotaxic and Apneustic centers
5. Explain the role of Hering-Breur inflation reflex in regulation of inspiration
6. Explain the role of central chemoreceptors in regulation of respiration
7. Explain the role of peripheral chemoreceptors in regulation of respiration
8. Explain the regulation of respiration during exercise
9. Integrate the respiratory regulatory mechanisms
10. Describe the Cheyne-Stokes breathing
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 42, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 36, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 13, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
Histopathology of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Visual treat
Histopathology of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Visual treat
Part II - Body Grief: Losing parts of ourselves and our identity before, duri...
Learn about body grief and ways to cope with it. We will also explore methods to heal from this challenging experience.
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptxHolistified Wellness
We’re talking about Vedic Meditation, a form of meditation that has been around for at least 5,000 years. Back then, the people who lived in the Indus Valley, now known as India and Pakistan, practised meditation as a fundamental part of daily life. This knowledge that has given us yoga and Ayurveda, was known as Veda, hence the name Vedic. And though there are some written records, the practice has been passed down verbally from generation to generation.TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd...
TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd Edition by DeMarco, Walsh, Verified Chapters 1 - 25, Complete Newest Version TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd Edition by DeMarco, Walsh, Verified Chapters 1 - 25, Complete Newest Version TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd Edition by DeMarco, Walsh, Verified Chapters 1 - 25, Complete Newest Version Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Pdf Chapters Download Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Pdf Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Study Guide Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Ebook Download Stuvia Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Questions and Answers Quizlet Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Studocu Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Quizlet Test Bank For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Stuvia Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Pdf Chapters Download Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Pdf Download Course Hero Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Answers Quizlet Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Ebook Download Course hero Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Questions and Answers Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Studocu Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Quizlet Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Stuvia Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Pdf Chapters Download Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Pdf Download Stuvia Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Study Guide Questions and Answers Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Ebook Download Stuvia Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Questions Quizlet Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Studocu Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Quizlet Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice 3rd Edition Test Bank Stuvia
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
• Pitfalls and pivots needed to use AI effectively in public health
• Evidence-based strategies to address health misinformation effectively
• Building trust with communities online and offline
• Equipping health professionals to address questions, concerns and health misinformation
• Assessing risk and mitigating harm from adverse health narratives in communities, health workforce and health system
Efficacy of Avartana Sneha in Ayurveda
Avartana Sneha is a unique method of Preparation of Sneha Kalpana in Ayurveda, mainly it is indicated for the Vataja rogas.
LOOPS in orthodontics t loop bull loop vertical loop mushroom loop stop loop
vertical loop
horizontal loop
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Ketone bodies and metabolism-biochemistry
This slide consists of all the topics of ketone . This can be used for exam purpose for writing about Diabetic keto acidosis etc . Thank you
Recently uploaded (20)
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...
Vestibulocochlear Nerve by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Vestibulocochlear Nerve by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Role of Mukta Pishti in the Management of Hyperthyroidism
Role of Mukta Pishti in the Management of Hyperthyroidism
Top Effective Soaps for Fungal Skin Infections in India
Top Effective Soaps for Fungal Skin Infections in India
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
Histopathology of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Visual treat
Histopathology of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Visual treat
Part II - Body Grief: Losing parts of ourselves and our identity before, duri...
Part II - Body Grief: Losing parts of ourselves and our identity before, duri...
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd...
TEST BANK For Community and Public Health Nursing: Evidence for Practice, 3rd...
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 6_Anti Malarial Drugs.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 6_Anti Malarial Drugs.pdf
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
share - Lions, tigers, AI and health misinformation, oh my!.pptx
LOOPS in orthodontics t loop bull loop vertical loop mushroom loop stop loop
LOOPS in orthodontics t loop bull loop vertical loop mushroom loop stop loop
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
A strategic approach to publication
- 1. A strategic approach to publishing your research Roger Watson www.slideshare.net/RogerWatsonPhDRNFAAN
- 2. Strategy A plan of action designed to achieve a long-term or overall aim.
- 5. Establish a production line
- 8. Prioritise • Drafts over new manuscripts • Revisions over drafts
- 9. Aim at a ‘cluster’ of journals
- 11. Learn to write anywhere and everywhere • Office • Home • Trains • Planes • Hotels
- 12. Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research
- 13. Promoting integrity in research publication COPE http://publicationethics.org/
- 14. Seeking criticism Find a ‘critical friend’
- 15. Seek criticism of your writing NOT THIS OR THIS THIS
- 16. Learn when to let go
- 17. Dealing with reviewer’s comments Apply the ‘golden rules’ (Williams 2004) Rule 1. Answer completely Rule 2. Answer politely Rule 3. Answer with evidence
- 18. Answer completely Deal with every point, even if you don’t agree or can’t change it Make a list of points – even if not presented with a list
- 19. Answer politely Don’t start with: ‘We completely disagree with the comments of the reviewer’ ‘Who on earth are your reviewers?’ …etc!
- 20. Answer with evidence If you disagree with the reviewer then provide evidence: facts and references
- 21. Edited by Karen Holland and Roger Watson An invaluable guide on writing for publication, enabling the reader to develop skills in writing articles, book reviews and other forms of publications, written by experts in the field. September 2012, 288 pages ISBN: 9780470657829 £19.99 / €25.90 / $32.95 Order online at www.wiley.com Prefer digital? Visit your e-book retailer to order Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare: Getting It Right