Journal editors evaluate all manuscripts that are submitted to their journal, select those which they consider to be suitable for the journal to send for peer review, and consider peer reviewers’ advice to make a final decision about what gets published. Therefore, it is important to know how they make their decisions.
This presentation looks at some of the presenting issues for Third-Level students who are studying for a Masters Degree or Doctorate. It has a particular focus on the 'adult' learner or 'mature student'.
Peer review process of academic publications is introduced and a sample given for how this is carried out within an academic teaching module. Guidance given on best ways to carry out a peer review.
Workshop -- How to successfully write a scientific paper?KnihovnaUTB
Přednášející: Katarzyna Gaca-Zając, PhD Eng. | Elsevier
***********
Během školení se jeho účastníci naučí úspěšně napsat kvalitní vědecký článek, který bude korespondovat s vědeckou komunitou a umožní jeho autorům získat uznání. Představeny budou osvědčené postupy, které jsou založeny na zkušenostech výzkumných pracovníků, redaktorů a čtenářů. Školení je určeno především začínajícím výzkumným pracovníkům, vítáni jsou ale všichni vědečtí pracovníci a akademici.
**********
During this training the attendees will learn how to successfully write a good quality research paper, which will resonate well with the scientific community and will allow them to gain recognition. A summary of the best practices in writing will be presented and these are based on experience of researchers, editors and readers. The training is addressed primarily to young researchers, although senior academics are also welcome to attend.
Dr.Eddy explains the basics of publishing in English language journals, sharing knowledge he has built over years of experience as a researcher. He writes about important aspects of journal publication. Read Dr.Eddy’s tips on how to publish successfully.
This presentation looks at some of the presenting issues for Third-Level students who are studying for a Masters Degree or Doctorate. It has a particular focus on the 'adult' learner or 'mature student'.
Peer review process of academic publications is introduced and a sample given for how this is carried out within an academic teaching module. Guidance given on best ways to carry out a peer review.
Workshop -- How to successfully write a scientific paper?KnihovnaUTB
Přednášející: Katarzyna Gaca-Zając, PhD Eng. | Elsevier
***********
Během školení se jeho účastníci naučí úspěšně napsat kvalitní vědecký článek, který bude korespondovat s vědeckou komunitou a umožní jeho autorům získat uznání. Představeny budou osvědčené postupy, které jsou založeny na zkušenostech výzkumných pracovníků, redaktorů a čtenářů. Školení je určeno především začínajícím výzkumným pracovníkům, vítáni jsou ale všichni vědečtí pracovníci a akademici.
**********
During this training the attendees will learn how to successfully write a good quality research paper, which will resonate well with the scientific community and will allow them to gain recognition. A summary of the best practices in writing will be presented and these are based on experience of researchers, editors and readers. The training is addressed primarily to young researchers, although senior academics are also welcome to attend.
Dr.Eddy explains the basics of publishing in English language journals, sharing knowledge he has built over years of experience as a researcher. He writes about important aspects of journal publication. Read Dr.Eddy’s tips on how to publish successfully.
PUBLISHING AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNALS:WRITI...IFPRI-PIM
This webinar, the 3rd and final in the series “Publishing Agricultural Development Research in Social Science Journals”, focuses on the specifics of the referee process—how (and why) to do good reviews, and how to respond to referee comments received. The session includes sample “revise and resubmit” reviews.
More info about the series: https://bit.ly/PublishingAgRes
PUBLISHING AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNALSIFPRI-PIM
Webinar #1, recorded on Nov. 23, 2020: "The Journal Publication Landscape"
Presenters: Ruth Meinzen-Dick (IFPRI/PIM) and Cheryl Doss (Oxford/PIM)
More details about the series of webinars: https://bit.ly/PublishingAgRes
Do Yourself a Favor…
Learn HOW to Publish A Research
Paper
(50% off Coupon)
https://www.udemy.com/scientific-research-paper/?couponCode=UNCEDU
Take an opportunity to “Learn to Publish A Research
Paper”. Add value to research skills and knowledge today!
I’m excited to help you add value to your capabilities by
adding skills and knowledge our course provides in your as
you move up your ladder. Upon successful completion of
our course, more and more people realize just how capable
they really are. This course is meant for beginners that are
not familiar with Research Journals and/or students
looking for a quick refresher on how to publish a research
paper. No prior knowledge is needed.
At the end of this course, students will be able to:
1. outline a complete research paper
2. choose an appropriate journal to which you'll submit
the finished paper for publication
3. prepare a checklist that will allow you to
independently judge whether your paper is ready to
submit.
If an audio or video stops, simply restart your browser.
This rarely occurs, but restarted often works.
At a time when publication pressure and learning how NOT to write paper is an very important as learning how to write it! In this slide several tips of what to avoid when writing your paper. What to avoid includes Take the lazy route and plagiarize, apply incorrect referencing of statements, give little care to grammar, spelling, figures and tables, Ignore editor and reviewer comments, etc.
Study Guide for Critically Reading Scholarly ArticlesSpelman College
This template is designed to guide a collaborative composition assignment. Using a wiki or Google Docs, students can 'crowdsource' complex scholarly articles by distributing the questions. The template has also been used to enable students to create a class handout for a discussion they lead about an assigned article. This template could function as a study guide that prepares students for a quiz, synthesis essay, or in-depth class discussion about the conventions of academic writing. Regardless, the content would help instructors create lesson plans about academic writing conventions and college-level standards of reading comprehension.
This session offers insights into the reviewing process associated with academic journals, which will help you in the roles of both reviewer and author. It will offer advice and reflection on when to accept an invitation to review, and on the benefits and practicalities of the process.
PUBLISHING AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNALS:WRITI...IFPRI-PIM
This webinar, the 3rd and final in the series “Publishing Agricultural Development Research in Social Science Journals”, focuses on the specifics of the referee process—how (and why) to do good reviews, and how to respond to referee comments received. The session includes sample “revise and resubmit” reviews.
More info about the series: https://bit.ly/PublishingAgRes
PUBLISHING AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNALSIFPRI-PIM
Webinar #1, recorded on Nov. 23, 2020: "The Journal Publication Landscape"
Presenters: Ruth Meinzen-Dick (IFPRI/PIM) and Cheryl Doss (Oxford/PIM)
More details about the series of webinars: https://bit.ly/PublishingAgRes
Do Yourself a Favor…
Learn HOW to Publish A Research
Paper
(50% off Coupon)
https://www.udemy.com/scientific-research-paper/?couponCode=UNCEDU
Take an opportunity to “Learn to Publish A Research
Paper”. Add value to research skills and knowledge today!
I’m excited to help you add value to your capabilities by
adding skills and knowledge our course provides in your as
you move up your ladder. Upon successful completion of
our course, more and more people realize just how capable
they really are. This course is meant for beginners that are
not familiar with Research Journals and/or students
looking for a quick refresher on how to publish a research
paper. No prior knowledge is needed.
At the end of this course, students will be able to:
1. outline a complete research paper
2. choose an appropriate journal to which you'll submit
the finished paper for publication
3. prepare a checklist that will allow you to
independently judge whether your paper is ready to
submit.
If an audio or video stops, simply restart your browser.
This rarely occurs, but restarted often works.
At a time when publication pressure and learning how NOT to write paper is an very important as learning how to write it! In this slide several tips of what to avoid when writing your paper. What to avoid includes Take the lazy route and plagiarize, apply incorrect referencing of statements, give little care to grammar, spelling, figures and tables, Ignore editor and reviewer comments, etc.
Study Guide for Critically Reading Scholarly ArticlesSpelman College
This template is designed to guide a collaborative composition assignment. Using a wiki or Google Docs, students can 'crowdsource' complex scholarly articles by distributing the questions. The template has also been used to enable students to create a class handout for a discussion they lead about an assigned article. This template could function as a study guide that prepares students for a quiz, synthesis essay, or in-depth class discussion about the conventions of academic writing. Regardless, the content would help instructors create lesson plans about academic writing conventions and college-level standards of reading comprehension.
This session offers insights into the reviewing process associated with academic journals, which will help you in the roles of both reviewer and author. It will offer advice and reflection on when to accept an invitation to review, and on the benefits and practicalities of the process.
How to improve the quality of our journals and of your manuscript (publisher’s perspective)
Rob van Daalen
Publisher at Elsevier
See also: http://youtu.be/s0fjjphxCLw
Presentation by Professor Simon Haslett at the University of Wales, Newport, Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT) Writing Retreat Workshop at Gregynog Hall, Wales, on Wedmesday 11th May 2011. Simon Haslett is Professor of Physical Geography and Dean of the School of STEM at the University of Wales. He is also Visiting Professor of Pedagogic Research at the University of Wales, Newport.
Lecture by Professor Simon Haslett at the University of Wales Student Research Conference, Cardiff, on Friday 13th May 2011. Simon Haslett is Professor of Physical Geography and Dean of the School of STEM at the University of Wales.
An overview of publishing trends in materials science with advice from Dave Flanagan, the Editor-in-Chief of Advanced Functional Materials on getting your best results published in top journals.
I recently gave this talk at the Sino-US Nanomeeting at the University of Science and Technology (USTC), Hefei, China and at a number of universities that I had the opportunity to visit.
Questions and comments are welcome in the discussion below.
Presentation by Professor Simon Haslett at the University of Wales, Newport, on 29th June 2011. Presented in association with the Leadership Foundation.
Explore natural remedies for syphilis treatment in Singapore. Discover alternative therapies, herbal remedies, and lifestyle changes that may complement conventional treatments. Learn about holistic approaches to managing syphilis symptoms and supporting overall health.
micro teaching on communication m.sc nursing.pdfAnurag Sharma
Microteaching is a unique model of practice teaching. It is a viable instrument for the. desired change in the teaching behavior or the behavior potential which, in specified types of real. classroom situations, tends to facilitate the achievement of specified types of objectives.
NVBDCP.pptx Nation vector borne disease control programSapna Thakur
NVBDCP was launched in 2003-2004 . Vector-Borne Disease: Disease that results from an infection transmitted to humans and other animals by blood-feeding arthropods, such as mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas. Examples of vector-borne diseases include Dengue fever, West Nile Virus, Lyme disease, and malaria.
HOT NEW PRODUCT! BIG SALES FAST SHIPPING NOW FROM CHINA!! EU KU DB BK substit...GL Anaacs
Contact us if you are interested:
Email / Skype : kefaya1771@gmail.com
Threema: PXHY5PDH
New BATCH Ku !!! MUCH IN DEMAND FAST SALE EVERY BATCH HAPPY GOOD EFFECT BIG BATCH !
Contact me on Threema or skype to start big business!!
Hot-sale products:
NEW HOT EUTYLONE WHITE CRYSTAL!!
5cl-adba precursor (semi finished )
5cl-adba raw materials
ADBB precursor (semi finished )
ADBB raw materials
APVP powder
5fadb/4f-adb
Jwh018 / Jwh210
Eutylone crystal
Protonitazene (hydrochloride) CAS: 119276-01-6
Flubrotizolam CAS: 57801-95-3
Metonitazene CAS: 14680-51-4
Payment terms: Western Union,MoneyGram,Bitcoin or USDT.
Deliver Time: Usually 7-15days
Shipping method: FedEx, TNT, DHL,UPS etc.Our deliveries are 100% safe, fast, reliable and discreet.
Samples will be sent for your evaluation!If you are interested in, please contact me, let's talk details.
We specializes in exporting high quality Research chemical, medical intermediate, Pharmaceutical chemicals and so on. Products are exported to USA, Canada, France, Korea, Japan,Russia, Southeast Asia and other countries.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTHCARE.pdfAnujkumaranit
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence processes by machines, especially computer systems. It encompasses tasks such as learning, reasoning, problem-solving, perception, and language understanding. AI technologies are revolutionizing various fields, from healthcare to finance, by enabling machines to perform tasks that typically require human intelligence.
Ethanol (CH3CH2OH), or beverage alcohol, is a two-carbon alcohol
that is rapidly distributed in the body and brain. Ethanol alters many
neurochemical systems and has rewarding and addictive properties. It
is the oldest recreational drug and likely contributes to more morbidity,
mortality, and public health costs than all illicit drugs combined. The
5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) integrates alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence into a single
disorder called alcohol use disorder (AUD), with mild, moderate,
and severe subclassifications (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
In the DSM-5, all types of substance abuse and dependence have been
combined into a single substance use disorder (SUD) on a continuum
from mild to severe. A diagnosis of AUD requires that at least two of
the 11 DSM-5 behaviors be present within a 12-month period (mild
AUD: 2–3 criteria; moderate AUD: 4–5 criteria; severe AUD: 6–11 criteria).
The four main behavioral effects of AUD are impaired control over
drinking, negative social consequences, risky use, and altered physiological
effects (tolerance, withdrawal). This chapter presents an overview
of the prevalence and harmful consequences of AUD in the U.S.,
the systemic nature of the disease, neurocircuitry and stages of AUD,
comorbidities, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, genetic risk factors, and
pharmacotherapies for AUD.
Flu Vaccine Alert in Bangalore Karnatakaaddon Scans
As flu season approaches, health officials in Bangalore, Karnataka, are urging residents to get their flu vaccinations. The seasonal flu, while common, can lead to severe health complications, particularly for vulnerable populations such as young children, the elderly, and those with underlying health conditions.
Dr. Vidisha Kumari, a leading epidemiologist in Bangalore, emphasizes the importance of getting vaccinated. "The flu vaccine is our best defense against the influenza virus. It not only protects individuals but also helps prevent the spread of the virus in our communities," he says.
This year, the flu season is expected to coincide with a potential increase in other respiratory illnesses. The Karnataka Health Department has launched an awareness campaign highlighting the significance of flu vaccinations. They have set up multiple vaccination centers across Bangalore, making it convenient for residents to receive their shots.
To encourage widespread vaccination, the government is also collaborating with local schools, workplaces, and community centers to facilitate vaccination drives. Special attention is being given to ensuring that the vaccine is accessible to all, including marginalized communities who may have limited access to healthcare.
Residents are reminded that the flu vaccine is safe and effective. Common side effects are mild and may include soreness at the injection site, mild fever, or muscle aches. These side effects are generally short-lived and far less severe than the flu itself.
Healthcare providers are also stressing the importance of continuing COVID-19 precautions. Wearing masks, practicing good hand hygiene, and maintaining social distancing are still crucial, especially in crowded places.
Protect yourself and your loved ones by getting vaccinated. Together, we can help keep Bangalore healthy and safe this flu season. For more information on vaccination centers and schedules, residents can visit the Karnataka Health Department’s official website or follow their social media pages.
Stay informed, stay safe, and get your flu shot today!
New Directions in Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Older Adults With Mantl...i3 Health
i3 Health is pleased to make the speaker slides from this activity available for use as a non-accredited self-study or teaching resource.
This slide deck presented by Dr. Kami Maddocks, Professor-Clinical in the Division of Hematology and
Associate Division Director for Ambulatory Operations
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, will provide insight into new directions in targeted therapeutic approaches for older adults with mantle cell lymphoma.
STATEMENT OF NEED
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) accounting for 5% to 7% of all lymphomas. Its prognosis ranges from indolent disease that does not require treatment for years to very aggressive disease, which is associated with poor survival (Silkenstedt et al, 2021). Typically, MCL is diagnosed at advanced stage and in older patients who cannot tolerate intensive therapy (NCCN, 2022). Although recent advances have slightly increased remission rates, recurrence and relapse remain very common, leading to a median overall survival between 3 and 6 years (LLS, 2021). Though there are several effective options, progress is still needed towards establishing an accepted frontline approach for MCL (Castellino et al, 2022). Treatment selection and management of MCL are complicated by the heterogeneity of prognosis, advanced age and comorbidities of patients, and lack of an established standard approach for treatment, making it vital that clinicians be familiar with the latest research and advances in this area. In this activity chaired by Michael Wang, MD, Professor in the Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma at MD Anderson Cancer Center, expert faculty will discuss prognostic factors informing treatment, the promising results of recent trials in new therapeutic approaches, and the implications of treatment resistance in therapeutic selection for MCL.
Target Audience
Hematology/oncology fellows, attending faculty, and other health care professionals involved in the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Learning Objectives
1.) Identify clinical and biological prognostic factors that can guide treatment decision making for older adults with MCL
2.) Evaluate emerging data on targeted therapeutic approaches for treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory MCL and their applicability to older adults
3.) Assess mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies for MCL and their implications for treatment selection
1. The other side: What Editors and Reviewers want?
Professor Vikesh Agrawal
MS, MCh
Professor, Pediatric Surgery
Department of Surgery
Editorial Secretary, Progress in Pediatric Urology
Editorial Consultant, JIAPS
President, Society of Pediatric Urology
2. What will we cover?
The review and editorial process
Choosing a journal!
Choosing a topic!
Practical tips before you submit!
What makes a good manuscript?
Revising a paper!
Resubmission!
What we don’t cover?
Research methodology
Structure of manuscript
Publication ethics
3. Submit a
paper
Basic requirements met?
REJECT
Assign
reviewers
Collect reviewers’
recommendations
Make a
decision
Revise the
paper
[Reject]
[Revision required]
[Accept]
[Yes]
[No]
Review and give
recommendation
START
ACCEPT
Author Editor Reviewer
Submission is not a “black hole”, you do get chances!
Michael Derntl. Basics of Research Paper Writing and Publishing.
http://www.pri.univie.ac.at/~derntl/papers/meth-se.pdf
5. Current scenario of journals- Vs
1
100
10000
60s 70s 80s New Millennium
Year
Nooftitleslaunchedandtill2020
6. Who is the audience?
Is it peer-reviewed?
Indexed, essentially a pubmed-indexed
Impact Factor
[the average annual number of citations per article published]
What is the rejection rate?
Average time to print?
Recently had similar publication?
Which is the right journal?
7. What to publish?
What to publish:
• Is it new?
• Is it true?
• Is it interesting?
• Is it important?
What NOT to publish:
•Out of date
•Incorrect/unacceptable
•Not of scientific interest
•Duplications
9. Submit a
paper
Basic requirements met?
REJECT
Assign
reviewers
Collect reviewers’
recommendations
Make a
decision
Revise the
paper
[Reject]
[Revision required]
[Accept]
[Yes]
[No]
Review and give
recommendation
START
ACCEPT
Author Editor Reviewer
Try and pass the first test- Editorial review!
Michael Derntl. Basics of Research Paper Writing and Publishing.
http://www.pri.univie.ac.at/~derntl/papers/meth-se.pdf
10. Why?
The peer-review system is grossly overloaded
and editors wish to use reviewers only for
those papers with a good probability of
acceptance.
It is a disservice to ask reviewers to spend
time on work that has clear and evident
deficiencies.
Initial Editorial Review
Many journals use a system of initial editorial review. Editors
may reject a manuscript without sending it for review
11. What do editors want?
Trueness- Data validation over experience
Important- Debate over settlement
Newness- Hypothesis over dogma and paradigm
Primary loyalty of editors is towards science
Courtesy: Prof Dhananjaya Sharma
12. What is Editor’s choice?
Relevant Title (Not misleading)
Clinical relevance
Cause-effect relationship
A well structured manuscript
Language is usually NOT a hindrance
13. Abstract: The key criteria for screening by editor
Should stand alone!
Consider it “A Teaser” of your article
Should tell the prospective reader what you did and highlight the
key findings.
You must be accurate and specific!
A clear abstract will strongly influence whether or not your work
is further considered.
14. Submit a
paper
Basic requirements met?
REJECT
Assign
reviewers
Collect reviewers’
recommendations
Make a
decision
Revise the
paper
[Reject]
[Revision required]
[Accept]
[Yes]
[No]
Review and give
recommendation
START
ACCEPT
Author Editor Reviewer
Try and pass the second test- Reviewers’ acceptance!
Michael Derntl. Basics of Research Paper Writing and Publishing.
http://www.pri.univie.ac.at/~derntl/papers/meth-se.pdf
16. References
More mistakes are found in the references than any other part of
the manuscript.
It is one of the most annoying problems, and causes great
headaches among editors…
Cite the main scientific publications on which your work is based
Do not inflate the manuscript with too many references – it doesn’t make
it a better manuscript!
Avoid excessive self-citations
Avoid excessive citations of publications from the same region
17. A Word about Your Words
NOT creative writing class.
Journal space is precious.
Be concise.
“If clarity can be achieved in n words, never use n+1”
19. Submit a
paper
Basic requirements met?
REJECT
Assign
reviewers
Collect reviewers’
recommendations
Make a
decision
Revise the
paper
[Reject]
[Revision required]
[Accept]
[Yes]
[No]
Review and give
recommendation
START
ACCEPT
Author Editor Reviewer
Try and pass the third test- Reviewers’ recommendation of revision!
Michael Derntl. Basics of Research Paper Writing and Publishing.
http://www.pri.univie.ac.at/~derntl/papers/meth-se.pdf
20. Poor science!
Can NOT be helped
Poor language…..
Why are the articles rejected?
Courtesy: Prof Dhananjaya Sharma
21. Why are the articles rejected by reviewers?
“The following problems appear too frequently”
22. 1. Data Analysis- Keep an Excel sheet
2. Introduction- Explain hypothesis
3. Explain methodology
4. Write results- Positive and negative
5. Discuss the hypothesis and prove
23. 6. Title your paper
7. Write abstract
8. Work on references
9. Work on Figures and Tables
10. Intended language check
24. 11. Read paper again > 2 days
12. Internal review
13. Revision
14. Intended proof reading
15. Submission
25. Submit a
paper
Basic requirements met?
REJECT
Assign
reviewers
Collect reviewers’
recommendations
Make a
decision
Revise the
paper
[Reject]
[Revision required]
[Accept]
[Yes]
[No]
Review and give
recommendation
START
ACCEPT
Author Editor Reviewer
Submission is not a “black hole”, Avail the second chance!
Michael Derntl. Basics of Research Paper Writing and Publishing.
http://www.pri.univie.ac.at/~derntl/papers/meth-se.pdf
29. Learn from their comments.
Respond promptly- As it’s fresh in the mind of reviewers
Nearly every manuscript requires revision.
Editors and reviewers mean to help you improve your article- Do not
take offense.
Minor revision does NOT guarantee acceptance
Revise the whole manuscript- not just the parts the reviewers point out
Carefully study the comments and prepare a detailed letter of
response.
Provide a scientific response to the comment you accept; or a
convincing, solid and polite rebuttal to the point you think the
reviewer is wrong.
Reviewing is a Painstaking task- Respect it!
30. Publishing speed- Be patient!
Many journals have now introduced a “Fast Rejection“ process by the journal Editor
31. Take home message
Choose indexed/ reputed journals
Choose a topic carefully: Lot of hardwork will follow
Prepare a manuscript well- Stick to science
Use internal review- Get involved in a team
Improve upon your language- Intended proof reading
Revision improvize your paper- Be receptive
Rejection is not a failure- May find a better journal
32. Your paper is worthless if no one reads, uses, or cites it
A research study is meaningful only if…
it is clearly described, so
someone else can use it in his/her studies
it arouses other scientists’ interest and
allows others to reproduce the results.
By submitting a manuscript you are basically trying to sell your
work to your community…