The document provides an evaluation of Jack Bevens' film production process. It summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of each stage, including research, planning, time management, technical qualities, aesthetic qualities, and audience appeal. Peer feedback on the film suggested adding subtitles to make it more accessible to those who cannot hear or understand sign language. Jack agrees subtitles should be added to improve understanding and agrees some audio could also be added for hearing audiences.

1. FMP Evaluation
Jack Bevens

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
• Strengths
• I researched the other films to show they are similar to my film.
• I found some images from Google.
• Weaknesses
• My film can not copy exactly the other films.
• I must create my own film which is different from the other films.

4. Planning
• Strengths
• My idea is better and more different than the other films.
• My storyline helps me make sense of the film.
• I used a script to help my actors learn their lines.
• Weaknesses
• Rooms are difficult to book.
• Sometimes my plan must be changed because of room issues.

5. Time Management
• Strengths
• My film was completed in only one day.
• Luckily all my actors were available and on time. There were no delays in
filming.
• Weaknesses
• Nothing, my time management was under control.
• I need to have more scripts available so my actors can learn their lines.

6. Technical Qualities
• Strengths
• I used editor from Premier, which was easy to learn.
• I know how to use a camera.
• I know how to write a script.
• Weaknesses
• I need to learn more about Premier.
• Chantelle showed me a professional script layout.

7. Aesthetic Qualities
• Strengths
• My film looks really good.
• The editing is perfect.
• My script look more professional, like a real script.
Weaknesses
• I need more professional shots.
• I need to give my actors the script before the film starts shooting.

8. Audience Appeal
• Strengths
• I want the audience to feedback about my film; did it match their expectations?
• I made the film based on what my audience said they wanted.
• I want the audience to really want to see my film.
• Weaknesses
• I disagreed with the audience’s feedback. I need to learn from this.
• I want made my own film without the audience’s feedback. However this would
not be a good idea because if the audience does not like my work they will not
go to see it.

9. Peer
Feedback

10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– It informs viewers about not leaving out people
who have trouble communicating.
• What improvements could have been made
to the product?
• Lack of subtitles.

11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked the meaning behind it and the fact it
includes people trying to make friends with him.
• What improvements could have been made
to the product?
– There could be subtitles for the parts where
people talk.

12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– I like the concept of how the simplicity of some
shots tell the story without the use of audio or
subtitles.
• What improvements could have been made
to the product?
– In parts the cuts between scenes aren’t
completely seamless and appear a little jumpy.

13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
• Adding subtitle.
• Adding audio. (for hearing)
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
• No, I didn’t disagree anything.

14. Peer Feedback Summary
• I will add subtitles because some hearing not understand
BSL languages and some people will difficult to hear on
background.
• I will add audio for hearing people want to hear that film
so I might add some music as well.