FMP Evaluation
Jack Garner
Production Process Evaluation
Research
• The strengths of my research was that it helped as It gave me an idea of
what story I wanted to use for my recording and how I wanted it to be
read. It helped my product because they gave me an idea of how other
stories are done. The weaknesses of my research is that I didn’t get much
information about the stories I was researching I could have improved by
spending more time on the research getting more could have made my
final product better by making it less basic.
Planning
• The strengths of my planning was that it helped me get my ideas for what I
wanted to create for my project I went through other ideas such as making
my story a clip for a cutscene in a video game, a radio show story or an
audio book in the end I decided to go with the audio book. Planning
helped my product to become better as I had a plan of what to do and
what I wanted to work on such as what sound effects i wanted, who I
wanted to record my story and what story I was going to use
Time Management
• I managed my time well with this project I I managed to get this done in
time I think If I had more time to work on my audio editing it would have
turned out better. I would have added some more sound effects in and
would have tried to make it shorter.
Technical Qualities
• In my editing I have backing music to fit with
the story just like other stories of the same
genre most stories also have sound effects
similar to mine
Aural Qualities
• I think it sounds good for the most part. It
wasn’t as creative because it was a pre
existing script that was censored to remove
some swearing. I would improve the script by
writing a new script and re record some lines
Audience Appeal
It appeals more towards the end as that’s when the story picks up and has
sound effects added instead of just music such as walking in the snow, a
tree falling and wind giving it an ominous atmosphere
Peer
Feedback
Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
• I liked the use of sound effects I think they
were in at the perfect times I also think the
backing music fit with the story's tone
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– The beginning was a little boring because it went
on for a while
Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked the music in the background because it
made it have an atmosphere.
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• It was a bit slow to start
Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– I liked the voice actor because his voice fit the
theme
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
– Even though I liked the voice actor he messed up a
little at times
Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback? I agree that the actor was a good fit
for the role I also agree that the start was slow
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?
• I don’t disagree with anything that was said in
my feedback
Peer Feedback Summary
If I was going to change anything I would get my actor to re record
some lines because he did mess up a few times another thing I
would change would be the beginning I would try to make it
shorter

7. evaluation(4)

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Research • The strengthsof my research was that it helped as It gave me an idea of what story I wanted to use for my recording and how I wanted it to be read. It helped my product because they gave me an idea of how other stories are done. The weaknesses of my research is that I didn’t get much information about the stories I was researching I could have improved by spending more time on the research getting more could have made my final product better by making it less basic.
  • 4.
    Planning • The strengthsof my planning was that it helped me get my ideas for what I wanted to create for my project I went through other ideas such as making my story a clip for a cutscene in a video game, a radio show story or an audio book in the end I decided to go with the audio book. Planning helped my product to become better as I had a plan of what to do and what I wanted to work on such as what sound effects i wanted, who I wanted to record my story and what story I was going to use
  • 5.
    Time Management • Imanaged my time well with this project I I managed to get this done in time I think If I had more time to work on my audio editing it would have turned out better. I would have added some more sound effects in and would have tried to make it shorter.
  • 6.
    Technical Qualities • Inmy editing I have backing music to fit with the story just like other stories of the same genre most stories also have sound effects similar to mine
  • 7.
    Aural Qualities • Ithink it sounds good for the most part. It wasn’t as creative because it was a pre existing script that was censored to remove some swearing. I would improve the script by writing a new script and re record some lines
  • 8.
    Audience Appeal It appealsmore towards the end as that’s when the story picks up and has sound effects added instead of just music such as walking in the snow, a tree falling and wind giving it an ominous atmosphere
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Feedback 1 • Whatdid you like about the product? • I liked the use of sound effects I think they were in at the perfect times I also think the backing music fit with the story's tone • What improvements could have been made to the product? – The beginning was a little boring because it went on for a while
  • 11.
    Feedback 2 • Whatdid you like about the product? – I liked the music in the background because it made it have an atmosphere. • What improvements could have been made to the product? • It was a bit slow to start
  • 12.
    Feedback 3 • Whatdid you like about the product? – I liked the voice actor because his voice fit the theme • What improvements could have been made to the product? – Even though I liked the voice actor he messed up a little at times
  • 13.
    Peer Feedback Summary •What do you agree with from your peer feedback? I agree that the actor was a good fit for the role I also agree that the start was slow • What do you disagree with from your peer feedback? • I don’t disagree with anything that was said in my feedback
  • 14.
    Peer Feedback Summary IfI was going to change anything I would get my actor to re record some lines because he did mess up a few times another thing I would change would be the beginning I would try to make it shorter

Editor's Notes

  • #4 What were the strengths of your research? How did your research help your product? What were the weaknesses of your research? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  • #5 What were the strengths of your planning? How did your planning help your product? What were the weaknesses of your planning? What could you have done better/improve? What effect would this have had on your product?
  • #6 Did you manage your time well? Did you complete your project on time or would your products have improved with additional time? What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?
  • #7 Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
  • #8 Does your work sound good? Was it creative? What aspects of your product’s audio do you like? What would you improve? How would you improve it? Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
  • #9 How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to your target audience. Make reference to specific recordings, dialogue, music and sound effects
  • #15 What changes would you make to your product based upon your peer feedback and why?