Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

A Study on Cost-Efficiency and Quality of OER Integrated Course Materials


Check these out next

1 of 26 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Viewers also liked (18)


Similar to A Study on Cost-Efficiency and Quality of OER Integrated Course Materials (20)

More from Open Education Consortium (20)


Recently uploaded (20)

A Study on Cost-Efficiency and Quality of OER Integrated Course Materials

  1. 1. 3/9/173/9/17 1
  2. 2. A Study on Cost-Efficiency and Quality of OER Integrated Course Materials Mohan Menon Disha Global Trust, Kochi, India B. Phalachandra Wawasan Open University OE Global Conference 2017 Cape Town 3/9/173/9/17 2
  3. 3. A Study on the Processes of OER Integration for Course Development 3/9/17 33/9/17 This is one of the sub-projects under a larger research project called Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D), coordinated by the University of Cape Town and undertaken as part of the grant received from IDRC of Canada by WOU. This paper is based on the findings of Sub-Project 7 – Action research study of teacher educators – Malaysia and India
  4. 4. Research Team Members of the Sub-Project Research Team: l Mohan Menon l Phalachandra B. l Jasmine Emmanuel l Chng Lay Kee 3/9/173/9/17 4
  6. 6. 3/9/173/9/17 6 Present Study l Most work being done in the OER movement involves creation of OER with less focus on reuse of OER l The study probes the operational processes involved in course development using available online multi- media OER materials for a 5-credit (200 hours study) course on ‘Research Methodology in Education’ involving course developers from Malaysia and India. l Findings of this study have provided some tentative answers regarding the reuse of OER materials for developing quality assured self-instructional materials.
  7. 7. Research Questions This Paper presents only the part of the study focussing on the following two Research Questions: 1. Will course materials developed by integrating OER be more cost-efficient? 2. Will the use of OER integrated course materials expected to be of high quality from learners’ perspective? 3/9/173/9/17 7
  8. 8. 3/9/173/9/17 8 Definition of variables 1. ‘Cost/Time Efficiency’: relates to a comparison of what is actually produced or performed (OER- integrated course development) with what can be achieved with the same consumption of resources in terms of money and time. 2. ‘Quality of learning materials’: Quality can be defined as ‘appropriately meeting the stakeholders’ objectives and needs which is the result of a transparent, participatory negotiation process within an organization’ (Pawlowski, 2007).
  9. 9. 3/9/173/9/17 9 OER Practice Engagement of OER search team, course developers and learners Reuse and Integration process OUTCOMES & OUTPUTS w Re-usability Digitised OER Materials Course Package Tool on OER Quality QUALITY PROCESS Findability & Reusability Factors IMPACT COST EFFICIENCY CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
  10. 10. Methodology l In this project the exploratory case study approach was adopted to understand and critically reflect on the factors and processes involved in the integration of OER material in developing a new set of course materials. l MIXED METHODS APPROACH- Qualitative and Quantitative l A variety of Research Tools used 3/9/173/9/17 10
  11. 11. Nature of Data and Data Source l Both Qualitative and Quantitative data 3/9/173/9/17 11 VARIABLE DATA SOURCE AND COLLECTION PROCESS COST/TIME EFFICIENCY From the course developers before, during and after their engagement in Course writing Quality of Learning materials From Course users after learning through sample units of the OER integrated course
  12. 12. 3/9/173/9/17 12 Research Tools Variable Tools Cost/Time efficiency v Search log v Course development LOG v Written Format for individual reflection on OER use v Narratives by course developers v Focus group discussions v Individual Reflection Questions v Semi-structured interviews Quality of Learning Materials v Course development LOG v Individual Reflection Questions
  13. 13. Data Analysis and Intrepretation l On the part of COURSE DEVELOPERS l A triangulation of findings from the content analysis and coding of the reflections and observations of the OER search team and course developers in the focus group discussions, interviews as well as diary recordings and their written log records and findability ratings was carried out. 3/9/173/9/17 13
  14. 14. COST/TIME EFFICIENCY 3/9/173/9/17 14
  15. 15. FINDABILITY Time taken 3/9/173/9/17 AAOU Coference,2015, Kuala Lumpur 15 FINDABILITY TIME No of Resources Percentage Less than 10 minutes 75 31.65 10 minutes 58 24.47 15 minutes 38 16.03 20 minutes 35 14.77 25 minutes 6 2.53 30 minutes 24 10.13 More than 30 minutes 1 0.42 TOTAL 237
  16. 16. Cost-Efficiency l Course Developers had expressed their thinking about cost-efficiency based on their experience of finding and reusing and integrating OER for course development. l When a large chunk of OER text materials (such as an open book or an entire course) are available in advance it became easier and less time consuming to use these materials and contextulise/localise them. l Using a large number of smaller reusable learning objects (RLOs) took more time. l Expertise in 7 competencies including 5 core competencies and 2 supportive competencies emerged in the study enhanced the cost efficiency of OER based course development 3/9/173/9/17 16
  17. 17. Cost-Efficiency l When OER materials are collected in advance for each concept or section of the modules by experienced and competent persons, the course writers took less time to integrate l The search team reported that over 80% of relevant OER materials could be searched, discovered and down loaded within 20 minutes in each case, of which over 55 % took only less than 10 minutes. l There is a general agreement among course developers that using OER enhanced the quality of the course produced in several ways 3/9/173/9/17 17
  18. 18. QUALITY OF COURSE MATERIALS 3/9/173/9/17 AAOU Coference,2015, Kuala Lumpur 18
  19. 19. Quality Assessment Tool • The quality of the course materials was assessed through a five point (Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree ) • Rating scale consisted of 7 dimensions and 38 items . • The seven dimensions are : Format and presentation, Language and communication, Self-learning Interactivity, Inclusiveness , Resources ,Assessment. • The scale was administered after the participants went through few units of Research Methodology Modules in a series workshops held in Sri Lanka, India and Malaysia 3/9/173/9/17 AAOU Coference,2015, Kuala Lumpur 19
  20. 20. OER Quality Assessment Scale (OER-QAS) 3/9/173/9/17 AAOU Coference,2015, Kuala Lumpur 20
  21. 21. 3/9/173/9/17 AAOU Coference,2015, Kuala Lumpur 21 Component No of Items Total Score possible Mean SD Format and Presentation 20 4 14.12 4.54 Language and Communication 30 6 23.22 3.18 Self-Learning 45 9 34.65 5.01 Interactivity 25 5 17.45 4.72 Inclusiveness 20 4 14.89 3.20 Resources 20 4 15.14 3.60 Assessment 30 6 21.79 4.93 Total 190 38 141.11 25.83
  22. 22. Findings t test results (for entire scale) N Mean Standard deviation t p Female 64 140.61 26.66 0.27 0.78 Male 28 142.25 24.77 t test results (for entire scale) N Mean Standard deviation t p Educators 49 135.57 29.72 2.42* 0.02 Students 38 148.37 19.31 Comparison of responses across gender Comparison of responses across participants * Significant at 0.05 level
  23. 23. Findings • The overall quality ratings of course materials is high. • All participants found the course material to be of high quality. This is also indicated with respect to different in dimensions of the scale. • While both female and male participants showed similar quality rating, the trainees group showed higher quality rating as compared to the educators. • It is logical to think that the educators would have higher expectations of quality than the teacher trainees.
  24. 24. CONCLUSION l Reuse processes are being studied for the first time in Asia and dimensions included in the study are being studied for the first time. l The findings are tentative as this is an exploratory case study l Open up a number of studies-Several Hypothesis emerged for further study l Impact on Learning to be studied l Second part of the Study – presented in another paper 3/9/173/9/17 24
  25. 25. Contact details of Authors Mohan Menon DISHA Global Trust, Kochi, INDIA Phalachandra Bhandigadi Wawasan Open University, Penang, MALAYSIA 3/9/173/9/17 25
  26. 26. THANKS 3/9/17 263/9/17 Authors would like to thank the ROER4D Team and IDRC for the support and funding Authors also would like to thank the Research Team members of Sub-Project -7. This presentation is released under CC-BY-SA open licence