3. The Reformers: Martin Luther
A Spiritual Problem
A Biblical Solution
âa righteousness that is by faithâ
Romans 1: 17
4. The Reformers: Martin Luther
A Spiritual Problem
A Biblical Solution
Then Along Came Tetzel
5. The Reformers: Martin Luther
A Spiritual Problem
A Biblical Solution
Then Along Came Tetzel
95 Theses
6. The Reformers: Martin Luther
A Spiritual Problem
A Biblical Solution
Then Along Came Tetzel
95 Theses
Leipzig (1519)
The events at Leipzig turned the debate
from Indulgences to Authority.
8. The Reformers: Martin Luther
The Debate at Leipzig (1519)
George the Bearded,
Duke of Saxony
âWhat good is a soldier if he is not
allowed to fight, a sheep dog if he may
not bark, and a theologian if he may not
debate?â
9. The Reformers: Martin Luther
The Debate at Leipzig (1519)
John Eck (1486-1543)
German Theologian
Roman Catholic Opponent of Luther
Professor, University of Ingolstadt
10. The Reformers: Martin Luther
The Debate at Leipzig (1519)
âI tell you that you are Peter, and on
this rock I will build my church, and
the gates of Hades will not overcome
it.â
John Eck quoting Matthew 16
11. The Reformers: Martin Luther
The Debate at Leipzig (1519)
âThe Holy Roman and Apostolic
Church obtained the primacy not from
the apostles but from our Lord and
Savior himself, and it enjoys pre-
eminence of power above all of the
churches and the whole flock of
Christian people.â
John Eck
12. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Eck accused Luther of being a disciple of John Hus.
John Hus
(1369-1415)
The Debate at Leipzig (1519)
13. The Reformers: Martin Luther
âUnless I am convinced by the testimonies of the Holy Scriptures
or evident reason (for I believe neither in the pope nor councils
alone, since it has been established that they have often erred and
contradicted themselves), I am bound by
the Scriptures adduced by me, and my
conscience has been taken captive by the
Word of God, and I am neither able nor
willing to recant, since it is neither safe
nor right to act against conscience. God
help me. Amen.â
Martin Luther
The Debate at Leipzig (1519)
14. The Reformers: Martin Luther
âA simple layman armed with Scripture is to be believed above
a pope or a council without it. As for the popeâs decretal on
indulgences I say that neither the Church nor the pope can
establish articles of faith. These must come from Scripture.â
The Debate at Leipzig (1519)
â... For the sake of Scripture we should
reject pope and councils.â
Martin Luther
15. The Reformers: Martin Luther
âMartin, there is not one of the heresies
which have torn the bosom of the
church, which has not derived its origin
from the various interpretations of the
Scripture.
The Bible itself is the arsenal whence
each innovator has drawn his deceptive
arguments. It was with biblical texts
that Pelagius and Arius maintained
their doctrines...â
John Eck
The Debate at Leipzig (1519)
16. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Leipzig: The Aftershock
1. Its About Authority
2. Now the Church was splitting
3. Luther felt Liberated
To the Christian Nobility
The Babylonian Captivity
The Freedom of a Christian
4. Sola Scriptura
17. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Luther and Sola Scriptura
âScripture Aloneâ is the Ultimate Authority.
1. It is above that of Church Traditions,
Hierarchy, Church Fathers, Elders,
Councils, Commentators, Interpretations...
2. No one (not even the Pope) has the right
to claim to be the Final Interpretive
Authority of the Bible.
18. The Reformers: Martin Luther
âI confess it is right that the sole authority
of Holy Scripture should outweigh all the
votes of all mortal men.
But the authority of Scripture is not here
in dispute. The same Scriptures are
acknowledged and venerated by either
side.
Our battle is about the meaning of
Scripture.â
Erasmus, Freedom of the Will
19. The Reformers: Martin Luther
The Pope is the
Final Authority.
Case closed!
The Pope is
wrong! I heed
Scripture, not the
pope.
There are many
difficult
passages. Donât
split over these.
20. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Luther and Sola Scriptura
â...in vain do they worship me, teaching human precepts as
doctrine...â
Matthew 15: 9
21. The Reformers: Martin Luther
1. Luther rejected the claim that church tradition had equal and
independent authority with the Scriptures.
2. He also rejected the claim that only the hierarchical church had the
authority to interpret the Scriptures correctly.
22. The Reformers: Martin Luther
For Luther, the Interpretive Principle is the
good news of Jesus Christ.
âThe gospel itself is our guide and
instructor in the Scriptures,â because âall
the scriptures point to Christ alone.â
1. Luther rejected the claim that church tradition had equal and
independent authority with the Scriptures.
2. He also rejected the claim that only the hierarchical church had the
authority to interpret the Scriptures correctly.
23. The Reformers: Martin Luther
âOur dear fathers wanted to lead us to the Scriptures by their writings,
but we use their works to get away from the Scriptures.â
âNevertheless, the Scripture alone is our vineyard in which we must
all labor and toil.â
24. The Reformers: Martin Luther
âOur dear fathers wanted to lead us to the Scriptures by their writings,
but we use their works to get away from the Scriptures.â
âNevertheless, the Scripture alone is our vineyard in which we must
all labor and toil.â
Scripture is our Primary Source.
Interpretation is the work of the Entire
Church, not just the Leaders.
25. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Luther and Sola Scriptura
Inspiration
âAll Scripture is given by inspiration of
Godâ.
2 Timothy 3:16
Thus, Scripture is Authoritative like
nothing else!
26. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Luther and Sola Scriptura
Inspiration
Unity
A unified Message.
The whole of Scripture, both Old & New
Testaments, sheds light on Scripture.
28. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Wait! What about that âEpistle of Strawâ?
1. Luther functioned with a âCanon within the Canonâ.
There are books that express the Gospel clearer (Matthew, Mark,
Luke, John, Romans) than others (James, Esther, Chronicles).
29. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Wait! What about that âEpistle of Strawâ?
1. Luther functioned with a âCanon within the Canonâ.
2. So, in comparison to Romans James does not express the Gospel
as clearly.
30. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Wait! What about that âEpistle of Strawâ?
1. Luther functioned with a âCanon within the Canonâ.
2. So, in comparison to Romans James does not express the Gospel
as clearly.
3. The âEpistle of Strawâ statement exists only in the pre-1537
editions of his Preface to the New Testament.
31. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Luther and Sola Scriptura
Inspiration
Unity
Clarity
âA simple layman armed with
Scripture...â
The Central Teachings are
Clear (enough of its purpose).
32. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Luther and Sola Scriptura
Inspiration
Unity
Clarity
âA simple layman armed with
Scripture...â
The Central Teachings are
Clear (enough of its purpose).
Unclear passages are to be
understood by the clear ones.
Church Authorities are not needed to
understand the Central Teachings in
Scripture.
33. The Reformers: Martin Luther
Luther and Sola Scriptura
Inspiration
Unity
Clarity
Sufficiency
The Bible is sufficient for us
to know everything God
wants us to believe regarding
faith and conduct.
We donât need another Revelation or
Holy Tradition.
34. The Reformers: Martin Luther
"The true rule is this: God's Word shall establish articles of faith,
and no one else, not even an angel can do so."
36. The Reformers: Ulrich Zwingli
But eventually I came to the point where led
by the Word and Spirit of God I saw the need
to set aside all these things and to learn the
doctrine of God direct from his own Word.
Then I began to ask God for light and the
Scriptures became far clearer to me â even
though I read nothing else â than if I had
studied many commentators and expositors.â
âWhen I was younger, I gave myself overmuch to human teaching,
like others of my day, and when about seven or eight years ago I
undertook to devote myself entirely to the Scriptures I was always
prevented by philosophy and theology.
37. The Reformers: Ulrich Zwingli
âBefore anyone in this area had even heard of
Luther, I began to preach the gospel of
Christ in 1516 so that I never entered the
pulpit without looking up the words which
were to be read in the mass that day and
expounding them on the basis of Scripture.â
38. The Reformers: Ulrich Zwingli
Of the Clarity and Certainty of the Word of God (1522)
â...Godâs Word can be understood by a
man without any human direction: not that
this is due to manâs own understanding,
but to the light and Spirit of God,
illuminating and inspiring the words in
such a way that the light of the divine
content is seen in his own light, as it says
in Psalm 36: âFor with thee, Lord, is the
well of light, and in thy light shall we see
light.ââ
39. The Reformers: Ulrich Zwingli
1. Preached from Entire Scripture, not Liturgy.
2. Emphasis on Original Languages.
3. Scripture above Traditions.
4. Scripture is the Basis of Religious Experience.
5. Scripture is Godâs Word, it is Powerful.
6. Scripture is Clear & Understandable.
7. The Test of Scripture.
40. The Reformers: The Anabaptists
Scripture is, âthe true witness of the Holy
Spirit and criterion of our consciences.â
Menno Simons
41. The Reformers: The Anabaptists
â...the whole Scriptures, both the Old and New Testament, were
written for our instruction, admonition, and correction, and that they
are the true scepter and rule by which the Lordâs kingdom, house,
church, and congregation must be ruled
and governed.
Everything contrary to Scripture,
therefore, whether it be in doctrines,
beliefs, sacraments, worship, or life,
should be measured by this infallible rule
and demolished by this just and divine
scepter, and destroyed without any respect
of persons.â
42. The Reformers: The Anabaptists
âI value the Holy Scripture above all human treasures but not as
high as the Word of God, which is living, powerful and eternal, and
which is free and unencumbered by all the elements of this world.
For insofar as it is God Himself it is spirit and
not letter, written without pen and paper that it
may never be expunged. Therefore also
salvation cannot be tied to the Scriptures,
however important and good they may be with
respect to it.â
Hans Denck, (1527)
43. The Reformers: The Anabaptists
âSince the apostasy first began through human writing and teaching
by means of which the divine Scriptures were darkened, the
Almighty has among us provided that all writings both new and old
which are not biblical should be destroyed, so that we cling only to
the Holy ScripturesâŚ.
Bernard Rothman at
Munster, 1534
For he who holds only to the Scriptures
needs no other writings.â
44. The Reformers: The Anabaptists
1. They often had an Individualistic Reading.
2. Not always on the same page.
3. Many accepted the Apocrypha.
4. Some distinguished the Word & the Letter.
5. Suspicious of Scholarship.
Editor's Notes
The Formal Cause of the Reformation
Romans 1: 17
âFor in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealedâ
a righteousness that is by faith from first to last, just as it is written:
âThe righteous will live by faith.ââ
It lasted for 3 weeks in June/July.
Metaxas, p. 166
George was the Duke that set up the debate.
The debate would be judged by theologians of the University of Leipzig (not friendly to Luther).
Leipzig Germany
Above quote said when the Leipzig theologians (at University) didnât want the debate.
The debate was originally between Eck and Andreas Karlstadt (1486-1541),
But Luther joined in.
It was going to be a debate about Indulgences, Justification, and Purgatory, butâŚ
âCase Closed!â
It is now about authority!
We follow the pope as he follows Christ.
âVicar of Christâ, the earthly representative of Christ.
During a break Luther ran to the library to read up on Hus, and concluded that Eck had a point.
A Czech Theologian. Hus became a hero to many Reformers.
Hus spoke against Indulgences (for Crusades) and placed the Authority of Scripture and Councils above the Pope.
John of Husinec (meaning Goosetown); Luther referred to the âGoose that was Cooked for Defying the Popeâ.
Luther was not irrational, âevident reasonâ.
Bound by âScriptures adduced by meâ. Wow!!
âI am neither able nor willingâ, Luther is stuck, âGod help me!â
A layman WITH Scripture, is better than a Council or Pope WITHOUT Scripture.
Is a layman with Scripture equal to a pope of council WITH Scripture?
Who are you going to choose? Scripture or Pope? Luther, in his mind, couldnât choose both.
At Leipzig Luther (and Eck) realized that this was a debate about authority, not just Church practice or theology.
Eck is arguing that there needs to be a Final Interpretive Authority (FIA), i.e. the pope.
Luther: Scripture is above any and all Interpretations. There is no FIA?
1. Justification, Indulgences are not the main topic anymore.
2. The Split is Happening. There is an Impasse.
3. Luther, no longer under Romeâs Rule is freed to say what he thinks. A very productive period.
Bondage of the Will, O Christian Liberty, Babylonian Captivity of the Church are quickly written.
4. We now need to apply Sola Scriptura to church life.
A greater Authority thanâŚ
No one Dictates the meaning of Scripture. The Pope says âYesâ, but the Bible says âNoâ.
You are claiming that your words equal Scripture.
To Claim to be FIA is to claim to be of Equal or even Greater Authority than Scripture.
It was an Authoritarian Culture. (We do need an authority, but not Authoritarianism)
The Church had an Attitude of Authoritarianism in Faith, as the Scientific Community had in Science (Galileo & Aristotle).
RC can make this claim as they hold that the Church is Inspired the same as Scripture.
Erasmus is confessing Scripture as the Sole Authority.
Luther was not willing to accept Erasmusâ view of the ambiguity of many passages of Scripture.
Luther was not willing to accept the Churchâs teaching on Justification or Indulgences.
For Luther Sola Fide was the litmus test of Biblical Integrity.
Erasmus used the Apostleâs Creed as the Essence of the Faith.
Letâs unite on the Apostleâs Creed, and allow differing opinions over interpretations.
Luther criticized the Church a for teaching Human (extra biblical) doctrines.
The pope as the Antichrist because he put himself in the place of Christ, âVicar of Christâ.
https://wordandworld.luthersem.edu/content/pdfs/26-4_Biblical_Authority/26-4_Kleinhans.pdf
2. No FIA
Lutherâs Works; 55 (A Brief Instruction) & 35 (Avoiding the Doctrines of Men)
The Word Made Words: A Lutheran Perspective on the Authority and Use of the Scriptures, by KATHRYN A. KLEINHANS
Found in Word & World Vol 26
https://wordandworld.luthersem.edu/content/pdfs/26-4_Biblical_Authority/26-4_Kleinhans.pdf
2. No FIA
Lutherâs Works; 55 (A Brief Instruction) & 35 (Avoiding the Doctrines of Men)
https://wordandworld.luthersem.edu/content/pdfs/26-4_Biblical_Authority/26-4_Kleinhans.pdf
âWe must allâ No FIA, biblical Interpretation is a labor for the entire Church (including historic), not just the elders.
To the Christian Nobility
https://wordandworld.luthersem.edu/content/pdfs/26-4_Biblical_Authority/26-4_Kleinhans.pdf
âWe must allâ No FIA, biblical Interpretation is a labor for the entire Church (including historic), not just the elders.
To the Christian Nobility
https://wordandworld.luthersem.edu/content/pdfs/26-4_Biblical_Authority/26-4_Kleinhans.pdf
One Collection, one Spirit, one Message.
Ah, how does the Epistle of James fit in here?
See, A Theology of Preaching and Dialectic: Scriptural Tension, Heraldic âŚ, By Aaron P. Edwards (30)
https://books.google.com/books?id=ARxeDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29&dq=luther+on+clarity+and+unity+of+scripture&source=bl&ots=M1AmN_ktSG&sig=cQUc0yLWrfUJAsRpHJtLiEd_Yx8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj39cussMPfAhURJXwKHcwmCGIQ6AEwCXoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=luther%20on%20clarity%20and%20unity%20of%20scripture&f=false
His Canon within a Conon was Informal, not Formal.
Some books express the Gospel clearer than others.
James has a more âcovertâ witness, than a direct witness.
Many Fundamentalists reject a âCanon within the Canonâ approach.
Which books are of primary importance?
The Torah expressed the religion of the Jews clearer and more fully than Ruth & Esther.
According to Luther, James had little to offer. Romans was the âpurist gospel of allâ , (Vanhoozer p. 75)
In another words he took it out.
Vanhoozer, Is there Meaning in this Text: The clarity of Scripture, in other words, does not mean that we will know everything there is to know about the text, but that we will know enough to be able, and responsible, to respond to its subject matter. The clarity of Scripture is not a matter of its obviousness so much as its efficacy; the Bible is clear enough to render its communicative action effective (317).
Ref?
NOTE; It is Articles of Faith, not science or other topics.
Luther is not saying that the Bible should dictate scientific observations.
But he did think Copernicus was rather silly.
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/65837/7/ZORA65837akz.pdf
From Concerning the Forbidding of Foods.
Church Fathers & Councils were okay, but secondary to Scripture.
Note: Luther was motivated by doctrine of Justification,
Zwingli, Humanistic influence from Erasmus; going to the original sources.
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/65837/7/ZORA65837akz.pdf
CLARITY: Scripture is clear and understandable to all.
3. Lent and Sausages.
4. Christian Like based on Bible, not Mysticism. Look for Biblical Examples of Religious Experiences.
We Meet God in Scripture. Other Experiences (Eucharist) are Secondary at best.
5. Bible is Infallible. IT will accomplish what God intends.
6. Even Unclear passages serve to draw the believer closer to Christ (like Augustine).
7. Filter
Simonsâ quote. The Anabaptists had no interest in Councils, Church Fathers, or Scholarship.
Donât forget, Most early Anabaptists accepted the Apocrypha as Scripture. (Simons included.)
https://www.bibleleaguetrust.org/the-anabaptists-and-holy-scripture/
(THE ANABAPTISTS AND HOLY SCRIPTURE, By John Hooper)
https://www.bibleleaguetrust.org/the-anabaptists-and-holy-scripture/
The Anabaptists were not always on the same page.
The Bible is like a Letter from a Friend, the Letter does not replace the Friend.
Denck was highly regarded by many Anabaptists, called by some, the Pope, Abbot, Rabbi.
https://www.bibleleaguetrust.org/the-anabaptists-and-holy-scripture/
The Anabaptists were not always on the same page.
Rothman at the Book Burning. He was an advocate of the Great Apostasy teaching.
NOTE: Rothman and Hans Denck would not get along.
https://www.bibleleaguetrust.org/the-anabaptists-and-holy-scripture/
Criticism: An Anarchy of Biblical Interpretation.
Similar to American Evangelicals.