SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2845
COMPARISON OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION FOR REGULAR AND
IRREGULAR BUILDINGS WITH DIFFERING FLOOR LEVELS AND SOIL
STRATUM
Dheekshith K1, Anusha2, Babitha B3,
1,2Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Srinivas School of Engineering, Mangaluru
3M.Tech Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Srinivas School of Engineering, Mangaluru
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - In the current work, an effort is done to study
these soil structure interactions when the structure is built on
different soil stratums for regular and irregular buildings
with various floor levels. In this project, chosen two different
soil layers for the analysis and the building is resting on
isolated footing with Ground floor, (G+2) and (G+4) regular
and irregular building is considered. Equivalent static
analysis is carried out in order to study the displacement, Von
Mises stress and stresses in X, Y and Z directions developed in
the structure.
Key Words: ANSYS MECHANICAL APDL, SOIL
STRUCTURE INTERACTION, REGULAR AND IRREGULAR
BUILDING, EQUIVALENT STATIC ANALYSIS
1. INTRODUCTION
The greater part of the civil engineering structure includes
some kind of structural component with direct contact with
ground. At the point when these exteriorforces,forexample,
seismic effects, act on these systems, neither the structural
displacements nor the ground displacements are
independent of each other.Themethodin whichthereaction
of the earth influences the action of the structure and the
action of the structure influence the reaction of the soil is
expressed as soil- structure interaction.
It has normally considered that soil-structure interaction
beneficially affects on the reaction of structure. Taking into
account soil structure interaction makes the structure more
flexible and accordingly rising the normal period of the
structure compared to the inflexibly supported structure.
The conventional overview is suitable only for certain class
of structures and soil conditions, for example, light
structures in moderately rigid soil. This statement does not
constantly hold true. The soil structure interaction can
enclose a damaging effect on the structural reaction and
neglecting soil structure interaction in the study may direct
to dangerous design for both superstructure and
groundwork.
The contact between the building,groundwork andsoil layer
underneath the footing modify the genuine performance of
the building significantly acquired by considering the
structure alone. Flexibility of soil layer beneath footing
reduces generally, hardness of the structure. In the
conservative investigation of a building, the base loads are
computed without consideringsoil settlement.Thestructure
is assumed as completely flexible structure in this kind of
study. The stress- strain features of soil layers are
accountable for differential settlement. The forces of the
structural members may change because of differential
settlement. It is essential to consider building frame, base
and soil as single important structural unit.
2. BUILDING DESCRIPTION
Table -1: Description of RC framed structure
Descript
ion
Mode
l-1
Mode
l-2
Mod
el-3
Mod
el-4
Mod
el-5
Mod
el-6
No. of
stories
Grou
nd
floor
Grou
nd
floor
(G+2
)
(G+2
)
(G+4
)
(G+4
)
Total
floor
height
3.2m 3.2m 9.6m 9.6m 16m 16m
Dimensio
n of
structure
16m
x
20m
16m
x
20m
16m
x
20m
16m
x
20m
16m
x
20m
16m
x
20m
Table -2: Material Properties of Concrete and Steel
Property Value
Grade of steel (N/mm2) Fe 415
Grade of concrete for all structural
members (N/mm2)
M-25
Modulus of elasticity of concrete
(kN/m2)
Ec = 5000√fck
= 5000√25
= 25x106
Poisson’s ratio for concrete 0.15
Concrete density 25 kN/m3
Table -3: Material Properties of soil
Soil Type
Modulus of elasticity
(kN/m2)
Poisson’s
ratio
Hard Soil 65x103 0.3
Soft Soil 15x103 0.4
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2846
Table -4: Geometric Parameters
Parameter Value
Slab thickness 0.15m
Beam 0.23m x 0.45m
Column 0.23m x 0.45m
Height of each storey 3.2m
Depth of soil layer 4m
No. of bays in X direction 4
Spacing of bay in X direction 4m
No. of bays in Z direction 4
Spacing of bay in Z direction 5m
Footing size 2.7m x 2.5m x 0.6m
Fig -1: Isometric and oblique view of Model-1
Fig – 2: Isometric and oblique view of Model-2
Fig – 3: Isometric and oblique view of Model-3
Fig -4: Isometric and oblique view of Model-4
Fig -5: Isometric and oblique view of Model-5
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2847
Fig -6: Isometric and oblique view of Model-6
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Equivalent static analysis is carried out for Ground, (G+2),
(G+4) for different soil stratum of depth 4m each and four
bays in both X and Z direction. The results obtained are
listed below.
3.1 COMPARISON OF DISPLACEMENT VALUES FOR
DIFFERENT MODELS
3.1.1 MODEL-1
3.1.2 MODEL-2
Description
Model-1
Regular
Ground
Floor
Model-2
Irregular
Ground Floor
Displacement 2.672mm 2.582mm
3.1.3 MODEL-3
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2848
3.1.4 MODEL-4
Description
Model-3
Regular (G+2)
Model-4
Irregular (G+2)
Displacement 7.164mm 6.482mm
3.1.5 MODEL-5
3.1.6 MODEL-6
Description
Model-5
Regular (G+4)
Model-6
Irregular
(G+4)
Displacement 12.074mm 27.726mm
3.2 COMPARISON OF VON MISES STRESS FOR
DIFFERENT MODELS
3.2.1 MODEL-1
3.2.2 MODEL-2
Description
Model-1
Regular
Ground Floor
Model-2
Irregular
Ground Floor
Von Mises
Stress
2955.8 kN/m2 2965.47 kN/m2
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2849
3.2.3 MODEL-3
3.2.4 MODEL-4
Description
Model-3
Regular (G+2)
Model-4
Irregular (G+2)
Von Mises
Stress
5094.96 kN/m2 4473.82 kN/m2
3.2.5 MODEL-5
3.2.6 MODEL-6
Description
Model-5
Regular (G+4)
Model-6
Irregular (G+4)
Von Mises
Stress
8904.97 kN/m2 25207.5 kN/m2
4. CONCLUSIONS
In the investigation of regular and irregular reinforced
concrete framed multi-storied structure, following
conclusions were listed.
1. It is important to consider the outcome of soil
structure interface before construction of any type
of structure. The results show that soil structure
interface plays a main part in response of structure.
2. Displacement value is more in irregular (G+4)
building when compared to regular (G+4) building.
But the displacement value is slightly more in
regular Ground and (G+2) building whencompared
with irregular Ground and (G+2) building.
3. Stress values obtained from the analysis is morefor
irregular buildings when compared to regular
buildings.
4. Von Mises stress values is more than regular
buildings when compared with irregular buildings.
5. Elastic properties of soil influence the performance
of the structure.
6. It is observed that the displacement value enhance
as the elevation of the building rises.
7. Change in deformation is observed due to different
soil layers. Different soil stratum gives different
values of deformation.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2850
REFERENCES
[1] Aarlin K Mathew, Sat Kumar Tomer and Lovely K M.
“Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction in Seismic Analysis
of Framed Structures using ANSYS”. International
Journal of Engineering DevelopmentandResearch.Vol-
3 pg.no: 1-9
[2] Ankur Acharya, Mrs. Rashmi Sakalle and Mrs. Nita
Rajvaidya. “Linear Soil Structure- Interaction Effect on
the Columns of an Unsymmetrical Plane Frame for
Different Types of Soil”. Vol-4. pg.no: 48-54
[3] Anushri C and Dr. B Shivakumara Swamy. “Study on
Performance of Regular and L-Shape Plan Irregular
Building with Dampers, Shear Wall and Infill Wall”.
International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology. Vol-3 pg.no: 616-620
[4] Aparna Obulasetti, Mr. V Srinivasa Rao, Mr. K Sundara
Kumar. “Seismic Analysis of RC Framed Office Building
Considering Soil Structure Interaction”. International
Journal for Technological Research inEngineering.Vol-
4. pg.no: 624-628
[5] Bhavani Shankar and Dheekshith K. “Comparative Study
on Seismic Analysis of Soil Structure Interaction with
Various Soil Properties by Varying Floor Levels”.
International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology. Vol-3. pg. no: 359-365
[6] Bhavani Shankar and Anusha. “Seismic Analysis of
Interlocking Block as Infill Wall”. International
Research Journal of EngineeringandTechnology. Vol-3.
pg.no: 506-512
[7] Chaitra H N and Dr. B Shivakumara Swamy “Study on
Performance of Regular and Vertically Irregular
Structure with Dampers, Shear wall and Infill wall”.
International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology .Vol-3 pg.no: 592-596.
[8] Lini M Thomas and Kavitha P E. “Effect of Infill Walls on
the Seismic Performance of the Multi-storeyed
Buildings”. International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology. Vol-4 pg.no: 90-96.
[9] Miss Anjali B and Dr. Raji M “Seismic Analysis and Soil
Structure Interaction of Multistoried Building with
Different Types of Footing”. International Journal of
Engineering Research and Technology. Vol-4 pg.no:
820-824.
[10] Mr. Magade S B and Prof. Patankar J P. “Effect of Soil
Structure Interaction on the Dynamic Behaviour of
Buildings”. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil
Engineering. pg.no: 9-14
[11] Priyanka T and Shilpa V B “Seismic Analysis of
Unsymmetrical Building with Different Bracing
Systems”. International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology. Vol-5 pg.no: 455-459.
[12] Ravi Kumar C M, Babu Narayan K S, Sujith B V and
Venkat Reddy D. “EffectofIrregularConfigurationson
Seismic Vulnerability of RC Buildings”. Architecture
Research 2012. pg.no: 20-26
[13] Ravi Kiran and Sridhar R “Comparative Study of
Regular and Vertically Irregular Building under
Seismic Loading”. International Journal ofResearchin
Engineering and Technology. Vol-5 pg.no: 141-144.
[14] Vidyashree S R, Dr. M D Vijayananda and Er.
Kirankumar K L. “Static and Dynamic Analysis of
Regular and IrregularShapeBuildingWithor Without
Shear Wall”. International Research Journal of
Engineering and Technology. Vol-3 pg.no:2611-2616

More Related Content

What's hot

Seismic performance evaluation of rc building connected with and without x br...
Seismic performance evaluation of rc building connected with and without x br...Seismic performance evaluation of rc building connected with and without x br...
Seismic performance evaluation of rc building connected with and without x br...
eSAT Journals
 

What's hot (20)

Modal analysis of multistorey rectangular buildings with 1:2:2.5 plan ratios
Modal analysis of multistorey rectangular buildings with 1:2:2.5 plan ratiosModal analysis of multistorey rectangular buildings with 1:2:2.5 plan ratios
Modal analysis of multistorey rectangular buildings with 1:2:2.5 plan ratios
 
Effect of Brick Infill Wall and Shear Wall in the Design of RC Framed Regular...
Effect of Brick Infill Wall and Shear Wall in the Design of RC Framed Regular...Effect of Brick Infill Wall and Shear Wall in the Design of RC Framed Regular...
Effect of Brick Infill Wall and Shear Wall in the Design of RC Framed Regular...
 
Influence of Outrigger system in RC Structures for Different Seismic Zones
Influence of Outrigger system in RC Structures for Different Seismic ZonesInfluence of Outrigger system in RC Structures for Different Seismic Zones
Influence of Outrigger system in RC Structures for Different Seismic Zones
 
IRJET- Analysis of G+15 Building Different Seismic Zones of India
IRJET-  	  Analysis of G+15 Building Different Seismic Zones of IndiaIRJET-  	  Analysis of G+15 Building Different Seismic Zones of India
IRJET- Analysis of G+15 Building Different Seismic Zones of India
 
Study on Behavior of Diagrids Under Seismic Loads Compared to Conventional Mo...
Study on Behavior of Diagrids Under Seismic Loads Compared to Conventional Mo...Study on Behavior of Diagrids Under Seismic Loads Compared to Conventional Mo...
Study on Behavior of Diagrids Under Seismic Loads Compared to Conventional Mo...
 
Usage of N2 Method for the Performance Evaluation of Plan Asymmetric Structures
Usage of N2 Method for the Performance Evaluation of Plan Asymmetric StructuresUsage of N2 Method for the Performance Evaluation of Plan Asymmetric Structures
Usage of N2 Method for the Performance Evaluation of Plan Asymmetric Structures
 
IRJET- Ultimate Load Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Triangular Screw Pile...
IRJET- Ultimate Load Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Triangular Screw Pile...IRJET- Ultimate Load Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Triangular Screw Pile...
IRJET- Ultimate Load Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Triangular Screw Pile...
 
IRJET- Comparative Study on CFST and Steel Diagrid Structural System for High...
IRJET- Comparative Study on CFST and Steel Diagrid Structural System for High...IRJET- Comparative Study on CFST and Steel Diagrid Structural System for High...
IRJET- Comparative Study on CFST and Steel Diagrid Structural System for High...
 
IRJET- Response of Adjacent Building for Seismic Pounding Effect on Bare Fram...
IRJET- Response of Adjacent Building for Seismic Pounding Effect on Bare Fram...IRJET- Response of Adjacent Building for Seismic Pounding Effect on Bare Fram...
IRJET- Response of Adjacent Building for Seismic Pounding Effect on Bare Fram...
 
Effect of Irregular Distribution of Load on RC Frame Structures
Effect of Irregular Distribution of Load  on RC Frame StructuresEffect of Irregular Distribution of Load  on RC Frame Structures
Effect of Irregular Distribution of Load on RC Frame Structures
 
IRJET- Performance of High Rise Building under Seismic and Wind Excitation fo...
IRJET- Performance of High Rise Building under Seismic and Wind Excitation fo...IRJET- Performance of High Rise Building under Seismic and Wind Excitation fo...
IRJET- Performance of High Rise Building under Seismic and Wind Excitation fo...
 
Cu35540546
Cu35540546Cu35540546
Cu35540546
 
IRJET- Study on Optimum Location of Shear Wall in Tall Buildings Against ...
IRJET-  	  Study on Optimum Location of Shear Wall in Tall Buildings Against ...IRJET-  	  Study on Optimum Location of Shear Wall in Tall Buildings Against ...
IRJET- Study on Optimum Location of Shear Wall in Tall Buildings Against ...
 
IRJET- A Review on Comparative Studies on Seismic Analysis of Multi-Story...
IRJET-  	  A Review on Comparative Studies on Seismic Analysis of Multi-Story...IRJET-  	  A Review on Comparative Studies on Seismic Analysis of Multi-Story...
IRJET- A Review on Comparative Studies on Seismic Analysis of Multi-Story...
 
The Study on Behaviour of Outriggers for Tall Buildings Subjected to Lateral ...
The Study on Behaviour of Outriggers for Tall Buildings Subjected to Lateral ...The Study on Behaviour of Outriggers for Tall Buildings Subjected to Lateral ...
The Study on Behaviour of Outriggers for Tall Buildings Subjected to Lateral ...
 
Optimum Location of Soft Storey in Tall Buildings Over the Height Using Respo...
Optimum Location of Soft Storey in Tall Buildings Over the Height Using Respo...Optimum Location of Soft Storey in Tall Buildings Over the Height Using Respo...
Optimum Location of Soft Storey in Tall Buildings Over the Height Using Respo...
 
Ke3418281832
Ke3418281832Ke3418281832
Ke3418281832
 
Seismic performance evaluation of rc building connected with and without x br...
Seismic performance evaluation of rc building connected with and without x br...Seismic performance evaluation of rc building connected with and without x br...
Seismic performance evaluation of rc building connected with and without x br...
 
Effect of Base Isolation on Seismic Performance of RC Irregular Buildings
Effect of Base Isolation on Seismic Performance of RC Irregular BuildingsEffect of Base Isolation on Seismic Performance of RC Irregular Buildings
Effect of Base Isolation on Seismic Performance of RC Irregular Buildings
 
A Comparative Seismic Evaluation of GFRP Reinforced and Steel Reinforced Conc...
A Comparative Seismic Evaluation of GFRP Reinforced and Steel Reinforced Conc...A Comparative Seismic Evaluation of GFRP Reinforced and Steel Reinforced Conc...
A Comparative Seismic Evaluation of GFRP Reinforced and Steel Reinforced Conc...
 

Similar to Comparison of Soil Structure Interaction for Regular and Irregular Buildings with Differing Floor Levels and Soil Stratum

Similar to Comparison of Soil Structure Interaction for Regular and Irregular Buildings with Differing Floor Levels and Soil Stratum (20)

Seismic Vulnerability of Plan Irregular RC Buildings with Soil-Structure Inte...
Seismic Vulnerability of Plan Irregular RC Buildings with Soil-Structure Inte...Seismic Vulnerability of Plan Irregular RC Buildings with Soil-Structure Inte...
Seismic Vulnerability of Plan Irregular RC Buildings with Soil-Structure Inte...
 
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Mass Irregularity unde...
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Mass Irregularity unde...Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Mass Irregularity unde...
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Mass Irregularity unde...
 
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Stiffness Irregularity...
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Stiffness Irregularity...Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Stiffness Irregularity...
Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Buildings with Stiffness Irregularity...
 
Elastic and Inelastic Responses of Multi-Storey Buildings Symmetric and Asymm...
Elastic and Inelastic Responses of Multi-Storey Buildings Symmetric and Asymm...Elastic and Inelastic Responses of Multi-Storey Buildings Symmetric and Asymm...
Elastic and Inelastic Responses of Multi-Storey Buildings Symmetric and Asymm...
 
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of High Rise Building
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of High Rise BuildingIRJET- Reliability Analysis of High Rise Building
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of High Rise Building
 
IRJET- Comparative Study of different Position of Shear Wall using Software
IRJET- Comparative Study of different Position of Shear Wall using SoftwareIRJET- Comparative Study of different Position of Shear Wall using Software
IRJET- Comparative Study of different Position of Shear Wall using Software
 
Effect of Positioning and Configuration of Shear Walls on Seismic Performance...
Effect of Positioning and Configuration of Shear Walls on Seismic Performance...Effect of Positioning and Configuration of Shear Walls on Seismic Performance...
Effect of Positioning and Configuration of Shear Walls on Seismic Performance...
 
IRJET- Comparison of Building in Sloped Area with and Without Outrigger
IRJET- Comparison of Building in Sloped Area with and Without OutriggerIRJET- Comparison of Building in Sloped Area with and Without Outrigger
IRJET- Comparison of Building in Sloped Area with and Without Outrigger
 
Comparative Analysis Of Different Irregular Building With Regular Building
Comparative Analysis Of Different Irregular Building With Regular BuildingComparative Analysis Of Different Irregular Building With Regular Building
Comparative Analysis Of Different Irregular Building With Regular Building
 
Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and soil...
Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and soil...Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and soil...
Soil structure interaction of RC building with different foundations and soil...
 
IRJET- Comparative Seismic Evaluation of Response of RC Building with Shear W...
IRJET- Comparative Seismic Evaluation of Response of RC Building with Shear W...IRJET- Comparative Seismic Evaluation of Response of RC Building with Shear W...
IRJET- Comparative Seismic Evaluation of Response of RC Building with Shear W...
 
Seismic Performance of Flat Slab Structures Under Static and Dynamic Loads
Seismic Performance of Flat Slab Structures Under Static and Dynamic LoadsSeismic Performance of Flat Slab Structures Under Static and Dynamic Loads
Seismic Performance of Flat Slab Structures Under Static and Dynamic Loads
 
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of High Rise Building
IRJET-  	  Reliability Analysis of High Rise BuildingIRJET-  	  Reliability Analysis of High Rise Building
IRJET- Reliability Analysis of High Rise Building
 
Effect of Oblique Column and Viscous Damper on Podium Structure Using Etabs
Effect of Oblique Column and Viscous Damper on Podium Structure Using EtabsEffect of Oblique Column and Viscous Damper on Podium Structure Using Etabs
Effect of Oblique Column and Viscous Damper on Podium Structure Using Etabs
 
Dynamic Analysis of Multi Storey Steel Structures
Dynamic Analysis of Multi Storey Steel StructuresDynamic Analysis of Multi Storey Steel Structures
Dynamic Analysis of Multi Storey Steel Structures
 
IRJET- Estimation of Ductility for High Rise Buildings for a Different Plan A...
IRJET- Estimation of Ductility for High Rise Buildings for a Different Plan A...IRJET- Estimation of Ductility for High Rise Buildings for a Different Plan A...
IRJET- Estimation of Ductility for High Rise Buildings for a Different Plan A...
 
Study on Behavior of Tubular Diagrid Structures During Seismic Excitation
Study on Behavior of Tubular Diagrid Structures During Seismic ExcitationStudy on Behavior of Tubular Diagrid Structures During Seismic Excitation
Study on Behavior of Tubular Diagrid Structures During Seismic Excitation
 
Performance of RC Frame Structure with Floating Column and Soft Storey in Dif...
Performance of RC Frame Structure with Floating Column and Soft Storey in Dif...Performance of RC Frame Structure with Floating Column and Soft Storey in Dif...
Performance of RC Frame Structure with Floating Column and Soft Storey in Dif...
 
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Vertically Irregular RC Framed Structure using X- ...
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Vertically Irregular RC Framed Structure using X- ...IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Vertically Irregular RC Framed Structure using X- ...
IRJET- Seismic Analysis of Vertically Irregular RC Framed Structure using X- ...
 
IRJET- Comparative Study of Vertically Irregular Buildings Subjected to S...
IRJET-  	  Comparative Study of Vertically Irregular Buildings Subjected to S...IRJET-  	  Comparative Study of Vertically Irregular Buildings Subjected to S...
IRJET- Comparative Study of Vertically Irregular Buildings Subjected to S...
 

More from IRJET Journal

More from IRJET Journal (20)

TUNNELING IN HIMALAYAS WITH NATM METHOD: A SPECIAL REFERENCES TO SUNGAL TUNNE...
TUNNELING IN HIMALAYAS WITH NATM METHOD: A SPECIAL REFERENCES TO SUNGAL TUNNE...TUNNELING IN HIMALAYAS WITH NATM METHOD: A SPECIAL REFERENCES TO SUNGAL TUNNE...
TUNNELING IN HIMALAYAS WITH NATM METHOD: A SPECIAL REFERENCES TO SUNGAL TUNNE...
 
STUDY THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR ON RC FRAMED STRUCTURE
STUDY THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR ON RC FRAMED STRUCTURESTUDY THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR ON RC FRAMED STRUCTURE
STUDY THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR ON RC FRAMED STRUCTURE
 
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RCC ELEMENT OF SLAB WITH STARK STEEL (HYSD STEEL) A...
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RCC ELEMENT OF SLAB WITH STARK STEEL (HYSD STEEL) A...A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RCC ELEMENT OF SLAB WITH STARK STEEL (HYSD STEEL) A...
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RCC ELEMENT OF SLAB WITH STARK STEEL (HYSD STEEL) A...
 
Effect of Camber and Angles of Attack on Airfoil Characteristics
Effect of Camber and Angles of Attack on Airfoil CharacteristicsEffect of Camber and Angles of Attack on Airfoil Characteristics
Effect of Camber and Angles of Attack on Airfoil Characteristics
 
A Review on the Progress and Challenges of Aluminum-Based Metal Matrix Compos...
A Review on the Progress and Challenges of Aluminum-Based Metal Matrix Compos...A Review on the Progress and Challenges of Aluminum-Based Metal Matrix Compos...
A Review on the Progress and Challenges of Aluminum-Based Metal Matrix Compos...
 
Dynamic Urban Transit Optimization: A Graph Neural Network Approach for Real-...
Dynamic Urban Transit Optimization: A Graph Neural Network Approach for Real-...Dynamic Urban Transit Optimization: A Graph Neural Network Approach for Real-...
Dynamic Urban Transit Optimization: A Graph Neural Network Approach for Real-...
 
Structural Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Symmetric and Asymmetric Shape...
Structural Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Symmetric and Asymmetric Shape...Structural Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Symmetric and Asymmetric Shape...
Structural Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Symmetric and Asymmetric Shape...
 
A Review of “Seismic Response of RC Structures Having Plan and Vertical Irreg...
A Review of “Seismic Response of RC Structures Having Plan and Vertical Irreg...A Review of “Seismic Response of RC Structures Having Plan and Vertical Irreg...
A Review of “Seismic Response of RC Structures Having Plan and Vertical Irreg...
 
A REVIEW ON MACHINE LEARNING IN ADAS
A REVIEW ON MACHINE LEARNING IN ADASA REVIEW ON MACHINE LEARNING IN ADAS
A REVIEW ON MACHINE LEARNING IN ADAS
 
Long Term Trend Analysis of Precipitation and Temperature for Asosa district,...
Long Term Trend Analysis of Precipitation and Temperature for Asosa district,...Long Term Trend Analysis of Precipitation and Temperature for Asosa district,...
Long Term Trend Analysis of Precipitation and Temperature for Asosa district,...
 
P.E.B. Framed Structure Design and Analysis Using STAAD Pro
P.E.B. Framed Structure Design and Analysis Using STAAD ProP.E.B. Framed Structure Design and Analysis Using STAAD Pro
P.E.B. Framed Structure Design and Analysis Using STAAD Pro
 
A Review on Innovative Fiber Integration for Enhanced Reinforcement of Concre...
A Review on Innovative Fiber Integration for Enhanced Reinforcement of Concre...A Review on Innovative Fiber Integration for Enhanced Reinforcement of Concre...
A Review on Innovative Fiber Integration for Enhanced Reinforcement of Concre...
 
Survey Paper on Cloud-Based Secured Healthcare System
Survey Paper on Cloud-Based Secured Healthcare SystemSurvey Paper on Cloud-Based Secured Healthcare System
Survey Paper on Cloud-Based Secured Healthcare System
 
Review on studies and research on widening of existing concrete bridges
Review on studies and research on widening of existing concrete bridgesReview on studies and research on widening of existing concrete bridges
Review on studies and research on widening of existing concrete bridges
 
React based fullstack edtech web application
React based fullstack edtech web applicationReact based fullstack edtech web application
React based fullstack edtech web application
 
A Comprehensive Review of Integrating IoT and Blockchain Technologies in the ...
A Comprehensive Review of Integrating IoT and Blockchain Technologies in the ...A Comprehensive Review of Integrating IoT and Blockchain Technologies in the ...
A Comprehensive Review of Integrating IoT and Blockchain Technologies in the ...
 
A REVIEW ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COCONUT FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE.
A REVIEW ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COCONUT FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE.A REVIEW ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COCONUT FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE.
A REVIEW ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COCONUT FIBRE REINFORCED CONCRETE.
 
Optimizing Business Management Process Workflows: The Dynamic Influence of Mi...
Optimizing Business Management Process Workflows: The Dynamic Influence of Mi...Optimizing Business Management Process Workflows: The Dynamic Influence of Mi...
Optimizing Business Management Process Workflows: The Dynamic Influence of Mi...
 
Multistoried and Multi Bay Steel Building Frame by using Seismic Design
Multistoried and Multi Bay Steel Building Frame by using Seismic DesignMultistoried and Multi Bay Steel Building Frame by using Seismic Design
Multistoried and Multi Bay Steel Building Frame by using Seismic Design
 
Cost Optimization of Construction Using Plastic Waste as a Sustainable Constr...
Cost Optimization of Construction Using Plastic Waste as a Sustainable Constr...Cost Optimization of Construction Using Plastic Waste as a Sustainable Constr...
Cost Optimization of Construction Using Plastic Waste as a Sustainable Constr...
 

Recently uploaded

21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
rahulmanepalli02
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Entity-Relationship Model(ER Diagram).pptx
The Entity-Relationship Model(ER Diagram).pptxThe Entity-Relationship Model(ER Diagram).pptx
The Entity-Relationship Model(ER Diagram).pptx
 
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptxanalog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
analog-vs-digital-communication (concept of analog and digital).pptx
 
Adsorption (mass transfer operations 2) ppt
Adsorption (mass transfer operations 2) pptAdsorption (mass transfer operations 2) ppt
Adsorption (mass transfer operations 2) ppt
 
Diploma Engineering Drawing Qp-2024 Ece .pdf
Diploma Engineering Drawing Qp-2024 Ece .pdfDiploma Engineering Drawing Qp-2024 Ece .pdf
Diploma Engineering Drawing Qp-2024 Ece .pdf
 
NEWLETTER FRANCE HELICES/ SDS SURFACE DRIVES - MAY 2024
NEWLETTER FRANCE HELICES/ SDS SURFACE DRIVES - MAY 2024NEWLETTER FRANCE HELICES/ SDS SURFACE DRIVES - MAY 2024
NEWLETTER FRANCE HELICES/ SDS SURFACE DRIVES - MAY 2024
 
CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES - Cloud Reference Modal
CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES - Cloud Reference ModalCLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES - Cloud Reference Modal
CLOUD COMPUTING SERVICES - Cloud Reference Modal
 
Independent Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station
Independent Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging StationIndependent Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station
Independent Solar-Powered Electric Vehicle Charging Station
 
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
21P35A0312 Internship eccccccReport.docx
 
Passive Air Cooling System and Solar Water Heater.ppt
Passive Air Cooling System and Solar Water Heater.pptPassive Air Cooling System and Solar Water Heater.ppt
Passive Air Cooling System and Solar Water Heater.ppt
 
5G and 6G refer to generations of mobile network technology, each representin...
5G and 6G refer to generations of mobile network technology, each representin...5G and 6G refer to generations of mobile network technology, each representin...
5G and 6G refer to generations of mobile network technology, each representin...
 
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdflitvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
litvinenko_Henry_Intrusion_Hong-Kong_2024.pdf
 
Intro to Design (for Engineers) at Sydney Uni
Intro to Design (for Engineers) at Sydney UniIntro to Design (for Engineers) at Sydney Uni
Intro to Design (for Engineers) at Sydney Uni
 
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptxSLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
SLIDESHARE PPT-DECISION MAKING METHODS.pptx
 
Working Principle of Echo Sounder and Doppler Effect.pdf
Working Principle of Echo Sounder and Doppler Effect.pdfWorking Principle of Echo Sounder and Doppler Effect.pdf
Working Principle of Echo Sounder and Doppler Effect.pdf
 
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
8th International Conference on Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control (SMC ...
 
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
Theory of Time 2024 (Universal Theory for Everything)
 
Raashid final report on Embedded Systems
Raashid final report on Embedded SystemsRaashid final report on Embedded Systems
Raashid final report on Embedded Systems
 
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptxAugmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
Augmented Reality (AR) with Augin Software.pptx
 
Maximizing Incident Investigation Efficacy in Oil & Gas: Techniques and Tools
Maximizing Incident Investigation Efficacy in Oil & Gas: Techniques and ToolsMaximizing Incident Investigation Efficacy in Oil & Gas: Techniques and Tools
Maximizing Incident Investigation Efficacy in Oil & Gas: Techniques and Tools
 
21scheme vtu syllabus of visveraya technological university
21scheme vtu syllabus of visveraya technological university21scheme vtu syllabus of visveraya technological university
21scheme vtu syllabus of visveraya technological university
 

Comparison of Soil Structure Interaction for Regular and Irregular Buildings with Differing Floor Levels and Soil Stratum

  • 1. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2845 COMPARISON OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION FOR REGULAR AND IRREGULAR BUILDINGS WITH DIFFERING FLOOR LEVELS AND SOIL STRATUM Dheekshith K1, Anusha2, Babitha B3, 1,2Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Srinivas School of Engineering, Mangaluru 3M.Tech Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Srinivas School of Engineering, Mangaluru ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - In the current work, an effort is done to study these soil structure interactions when the structure is built on different soil stratums for regular and irregular buildings with various floor levels. In this project, chosen two different soil layers for the analysis and the building is resting on isolated footing with Ground floor, (G+2) and (G+4) regular and irregular building is considered. Equivalent static analysis is carried out in order to study the displacement, Von Mises stress and stresses in X, Y and Z directions developed in the structure. Key Words: ANSYS MECHANICAL APDL, SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION, REGULAR AND IRREGULAR BUILDING, EQUIVALENT STATIC ANALYSIS 1. INTRODUCTION The greater part of the civil engineering structure includes some kind of structural component with direct contact with ground. At the point when these exteriorforces,forexample, seismic effects, act on these systems, neither the structural displacements nor the ground displacements are independent of each other.Themethodin whichthereaction of the earth influences the action of the structure and the action of the structure influence the reaction of the soil is expressed as soil- structure interaction. It has normally considered that soil-structure interaction beneficially affects on the reaction of structure. Taking into account soil structure interaction makes the structure more flexible and accordingly rising the normal period of the structure compared to the inflexibly supported structure. The conventional overview is suitable only for certain class of structures and soil conditions, for example, light structures in moderately rigid soil. This statement does not constantly hold true. The soil structure interaction can enclose a damaging effect on the structural reaction and neglecting soil structure interaction in the study may direct to dangerous design for both superstructure and groundwork. The contact between the building,groundwork andsoil layer underneath the footing modify the genuine performance of the building significantly acquired by considering the structure alone. Flexibility of soil layer beneath footing reduces generally, hardness of the structure. In the conservative investigation of a building, the base loads are computed without consideringsoil settlement.Thestructure is assumed as completely flexible structure in this kind of study. The stress- strain features of soil layers are accountable for differential settlement. The forces of the structural members may change because of differential settlement. It is essential to consider building frame, base and soil as single important structural unit. 2. BUILDING DESCRIPTION Table -1: Description of RC framed structure Descript ion Mode l-1 Mode l-2 Mod el-3 Mod el-4 Mod el-5 Mod el-6 No. of stories Grou nd floor Grou nd floor (G+2 ) (G+2 ) (G+4 ) (G+4 ) Total floor height 3.2m 3.2m 9.6m 9.6m 16m 16m Dimensio n of structure 16m x 20m 16m x 20m 16m x 20m 16m x 20m 16m x 20m 16m x 20m Table -2: Material Properties of Concrete and Steel Property Value Grade of steel (N/mm2) Fe 415 Grade of concrete for all structural members (N/mm2) M-25 Modulus of elasticity of concrete (kN/m2) Ec = 5000√fck = 5000√25 = 25x106 Poisson’s ratio for concrete 0.15 Concrete density 25 kN/m3 Table -3: Material Properties of soil Soil Type Modulus of elasticity (kN/m2) Poisson’s ratio Hard Soil 65x103 0.3 Soft Soil 15x103 0.4
  • 2. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2846 Table -4: Geometric Parameters Parameter Value Slab thickness 0.15m Beam 0.23m x 0.45m Column 0.23m x 0.45m Height of each storey 3.2m Depth of soil layer 4m No. of bays in X direction 4 Spacing of bay in X direction 4m No. of bays in Z direction 4 Spacing of bay in Z direction 5m Footing size 2.7m x 2.5m x 0.6m Fig -1: Isometric and oblique view of Model-1 Fig – 2: Isometric and oblique view of Model-2 Fig – 3: Isometric and oblique view of Model-3 Fig -4: Isometric and oblique view of Model-4 Fig -5: Isometric and oblique view of Model-5
  • 3. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2847 Fig -6: Isometric and oblique view of Model-6 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Equivalent static analysis is carried out for Ground, (G+2), (G+4) for different soil stratum of depth 4m each and four bays in both X and Z direction. The results obtained are listed below. 3.1 COMPARISON OF DISPLACEMENT VALUES FOR DIFFERENT MODELS 3.1.1 MODEL-1 3.1.2 MODEL-2 Description Model-1 Regular Ground Floor Model-2 Irregular Ground Floor Displacement 2.672mm 2.582mm 3.1.3 MODEL-3
  • 4. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2848 3.1.4 MODEL-4 Description Model-3 Regular (G+2) Model-4 Irregular (G+2) Displacement 7.164mm 6.482mm 3.1.5 MODEL-5 3.1.6 MODEL-6 Description Model-5 Regular (G+4) Model-6 Irregular (G+4) Displacement 12.074mm 27.726mm 3.2 COMPARISON OF VON MISES STRESS FOR DIFFERENT MODELS 3.2.1 MODEL-1 3.2.2 MODEL-2 Description Model-1 Regular Ground Floor Model-2 Irregular Ground Floor Von Mises Stress 2955.8 kN/m2 2965.47 kN/m2
  • 5. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2849 3.2.3 MODEL-3 3.2.4 MODEL-4 Description Model-3 Regular (G+2) Model-4 Irregular (G+2) Von Mises Stress 5094.96 kN/m2 4473.82 kN/m2 3.2.5 MODEL-5 3.2.6 MODEL-6 Description Model-5 Regular (G+4) Model-6 Irregular (G+4) Von Mises Stress 8904.97 kN/m2 25207.5 kN/m2 4. CONCLUSIONS In the investigation of regular and irregular reinforced concrete framed multi-storied structure, following conclusions were listed. 1. It is important to consider the outcome of soil structure interface before construction of any type of structure. The results show that soil structure interface plays a main part in response of structure. 2. Displacement value is more in irregular (G+4) building when compared to regular (G+4) building. But the displacement value is slightly more in regular Ground and (G+2) building whencompared with irregular Ground and (G+2) building. 3. Stress values obtained from the analysis is morefor irregular buildings when compared to regular buildings. 4. Von Mises stress values is more than regular buildings when compared with irregular buildings. 5. Elastic properties of soil influence the performance of the structure. 6. It is observed that the displacement value enhance as the elevation of the building rises. 7. Change in deformation is observed due to different soil layers. Different soil stratum gives different values of deformation.
  • 6. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 04 Issue: 04 | Jul -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 2850 REFERENCES [1] Aarlin K Mathew, Sat Kumar Tomer and Lovely K M. “Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction in Seismic Analysis of Framed Structures using ANSYS”. International Journal of Engineering DevelopmentandResearch.Vol- 3 pg.no: 1-9 [2] Ankur Acharya, Mrs. Rashmi Sakalle and Mrs. Nita Rajvaidya. “Linear Soil Structure- Interaction Effect on the Columns of an Unsymmetrical Plane Frame for Different Types of Soil”. Vol-4. pg.no: 48-54 [3] Anushri C and Dr. B Shivakumara Swamy. “Study on Performance of Regular and L-Shape Plan Irregular Building with Dampers, Shear Wall and Infill Wall”. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. Vol-3 pg.no: 616-620 [4] Aparna Obulasetti, Mr. V Srinivasa Rao, Mr. K Sundara Kumar. “Seismic Analysis of RC Framed Office Building Considering Soil Structure Interaction”. International Journal for Technological Research inEngineering.Vol- 4. pg.no: 624-628 [5] Bhavani Shankar and Dheekshith K. “Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Soil Structure Interaction with Various Soil Properties by Varying Floor Levels”. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. Vol-3. pg. no: 359-365 [6] Bhavani Shankar and Anusha. “Seismic Analysis of Interlocking Block as Infill Wall”. International Research Journal of EngineeringandTechnology. Vol-3. pg.no: 506-512 [7] Chaitra H N and Dr. B Shivakumara Swamy “Study on Performance of Regular and Vertically Irregular Structure with Dampers, Shear wall and Infill wall”. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology .Vol-3 pg.no: 592-596. [8] Lini M Thomas and Kavitha P E. “Effect of Infill Walls on the Seismic Performance of the Multi-storeyed Buildings”. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. Vol-4 pg.no: 90-96. [9] Miss Anjali B and Dr. Raji M “Seismic Analysis and Soil Structure Interaction of Multistoried Building with Different Types of Footing”. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. Vol-4 pg.no: 820-824. [10] Mr. Magade S B and Prof. Patankar J P. “Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on the Dynamic Behaviour of Buildings”. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. pg.no: 9-14 [11] Priyanka T and Shilpa V B “Seismic Analysis of Unsymmetrical Building with Different Bracing Systems”. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. Vol-5 pg.no: 455-459. [12] Ravi Kumar C M, Babu Narayan K S, Sujith B V and Venkat Reddy D. “EffectofIrregularConfigurationson Seismic Vulnerability of RC Buildings”. Architecture Research 2012. pg.no: 20-26 [13] Ravi Kiran and Sridhar R “Comparative Study of Regular and Vertically Irregular Building under Seismic Loading”. International Journal ofResearchin Engineering and Technology. Vol-5 pg.no: 141-144. [14] Vidyashree S R, Dr. M D Vijayananda and Er. Kirankumar K L. “Static and Dynamic Analysis of Regular and IrregularShapeBuildingWithor Without Shear Wall”. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. Vol-3 pg.no:2611-2616