RPO America Peer Exchange: Rural Transportation Planning Programs
Item #6 ppt 640 tuxedo
1. Case # 676F
Compatibility Review
640 Tuxedo
Presented By: Jason Lutz
Community Development Services Director
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item #6
August 14, 2017
2. CASE NO. 676F
Consider a request of Jack Uptmore,
Uptmore LLC, owner, for the compatibility
review of the proposed main structure
located at 640 Tuxedo under Demolition
Review Ordinance No. 1860 in order to
construct a new single-family residence
with detached accessory structure.
3. SUMMARY
The applicant is seeking to construct a
new 2-story single-family residence with
detached accessory structure.
4. 4
BACKGROUND
Zoned SF-A
South side of Tuxedo, between Canyon and
Loveta
Replat creating 2 lots
Approved in March 2017
Western Lot (left) to be developed
Demolition of previous structure
Approved by Council in March 2017
6. 6
POLICY ANALYSIS
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 15,027 15,027
Main House Footprint 2,626
Front Porch 148
Side Porch 1 48
Side Porch 2
Rear Porch
Garage Footprint 484
Carport Footprint
Shed(s) Footprint
Breezeways
Covered Patio Structure 329
Other Accessory Structures
Lot Coverage / Lot Area 3,628 / 15,027
Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) NA% (VACANT LOT) 24.1%
7. 7
POLICY ANALYSIS
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 15,027
Main House 1st Floor 2,626
Main House 2nd Floor 1,086
Accessory Structure 1st Floor 484
Accessory Structure 2nd Floor
Other Structures 41
FAR / Lot Area 4,237 / 15,027
Total FAR
(45% or max 50% with bonuses)
NA% (VACANT LOT) 28.2%
8. 8
POLICY ANALYSIS
Height of 30’- 5 3/8”.
Structure complies with all regulations
concerning setbacks, height, and looming
standards.
Building Materials/Design
White siding, bronze windows, and a
brown standing seam metal roof
South Carolina influence
9. 9
POLICY ANALYSIS
Tree Removal
(1 Heritage) 16” Mountain Laurel
(12 Non-heritage) 14” Cedar Elm, 10”
Cedar Elm, 6” Oak, 11” Oak, 13”
Hackberry, 5” Mountain Laurel, 10” Oak,
14” Oak, 9” Oak, 14” Oak, 10” Oak, and
10” Cedar Elm
20. 20
ARB RECOMMENDATION
ARB reviewed the request on July 18, 2017.
Found the proposed replacement structure to
be compatible.
Approved the request as presented.
21. 21
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,
appropriate notice was posted on the City
website and a sign was posted on the
property
Responses received:
Support: (0)
Oppose: (0)