Case # 607F
Significance & Compatibility
Review
321 Normandy Ave.
Presented By: Jason Lutz
Community Development Services Director
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item # 7
January 11, 2016
CASE NO. 607F
 Consider a request of Andres A. Cuellar and
Jennifer Ashley Cuellar, owners, for the
significance and compatibility review of the
proposed replacement structure located at
321 Normandy Ave under Demolition Review
Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010) in order
to demolish 100% of the existing main
structure and construct a new single-family
residence with detached accessory structure.
SUMMARY
 The applicant is seeking to demolish all
existing main and accessory structures
in order to construct a 2,746 square feet
main structure and a 420 square feet
accessory structure.
4
BACKGROUND
 Legal Description (LOT 16, BLOCK
136, CB 4024)
 The property is zoned SF-B and is
located on the north side of Normandy
Ave., between Imly St. and Arbutus St.
5
PROJECT LOCATION
6
POLICY ANALYSIS
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 7,500 7,500
Main House Footprint 977 2,020
Front Porch 0 233
Side Porch 1 0 0
Side Porch 2 0 0
Rear Porch 0 231
Garage Footprint 0 420
Carport Footprint 0 925
Shed(s) Footprint 100 0
Breezeways 0 0
Covered Patio Structure 0 0
Other Accessory Structures 0 0
Lot Coverage / Lot Area 1,235/7,500 2,904/7,500
Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 16% 39%
7
POLICY ANALYSIS
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 7,500 7,500
Main House 1st Floor 1,135 2,020
Main House 2nd Floor 0 1,306
Garage 1st Floor 0 420
Garage 2nd Floor 0 0
Other Structures 100 0
FAR / Lot Area 1,235/7,500 3,746/7,500
Total FAR (45% or 50% with bonus) 16% 50%
8
POLICY ANALYSIS
 The proposed structure is 28’ in height
(max allowed 28’) as measured from
average grade.
 The proposed structure does not exceed
the maximum lot coverage of 40%.
 The proposed structure complies with all
required setbacks for the main and
accessory structures
9
POLICY ANALYSIS
 The proposed structure will have an
exterior comprised of brick and wood
siding (ship lap and shingle).
 The proposed roof will be comprised of
a standing seam metal roof.
 The existing home was built in 1925
according to the Bexar County Appraisal
District.
10
POLICY ANALYSIS
 The following bonuses were awarded
to increase the allowable F.A.R. from
45% to 50%:
 This application was received prior to
the amendments to the RDS standards
and the applicant is utilizing some
bonuses that will no longer be
available to subsequent applications.
11
POLICY ANALYSIS - BONUSES
 0.02% (Substantial Front Porch)
 0.02% (Pervious Driveway Material)
 0.02% (1 Story Garage)
12
EXISTING
SITE PLAN
13
EXISTING
STRUCTURE
14
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN
15
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION
16
PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION
17
PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION
18
PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION
19
20
21
ARB RECOMMENDATION
 On December 15, 2015 the Architectural
Review Board considered the request,
found no significance in the existing
structure, found the proposed
replacement structure to be compatible,
and recommended approval of the
demolition request.
22
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
 Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,
appropriate notice was posted on the City
website and a sign was posted on the
property
 Responses received:
 Support: (2)
 Oppose: (1)
QUESTIONS?

AH Meeting 01.11.16 - Item #7 - 321 Normandy

  • 1.
    Case # 607F Significance& Compatibility Review 321 Normandy Ave. Presented By: Jason Lutz Community Development Services Director City Council Meeting Agenda Item # 7 January 11, 2016
  • 2.
    CASE NO. 607F Consider a request of Andres A. Cuellar and Jennifer Ashley Cuellar, owners, for the significance and compatibility review of the proposed replacement structure located at 321 Normandy Ave under Demolition Review Ordinance No. 1860 (April 12, 2010) in order to demolish 100% of the existing main structure and construct a new single-family residence with detached accessory structure.
  • 3.
    SUMMARY  The applicantis seeking to demolish all existing main and accessory structures in order to construct a 2,746 square feet main structure and a 420 square feet accessory structure.
  • 4.
    4 BACKGROUND  Legal Description(LOT 16, BLOCK 136, CB 4024)  The property is zoned SF-B and is located on the north side of Normandy Ave., between Imly St. and Arbutus St.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    6 POLICY ANALYSIS LOT COVERAGEEXISTING PROPOSED Lot Area 7,500 7,500 Main House Footprint 977 2,020 Front Porch 0 233 Side Porch 1 0 0 Side Porch 2 0 0 Rear Porch 0 231 Garage Footprint 0 420 Carport Footprint 0 925 Shed(s) Footprint 100 0 Breezeways 0 0 Covered Patio Structure 0 0 Other Accessory Structures 0 0 Lot Coverage / Lot Area 1,235/7,500 2,904/7,500 Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 16% 39%
  • 7.
    7 POLICY ANALYSIS FLOOR AREARATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED Lot Area 7,500 7,500 Main House 1st Floor 1,135 2,020 Main House 2nd Floor 0 1,306 Garage 1st Floor 0 420 Garage 2nd Floor 0 0 Other Structures 100 0 FAR / Lot Area 1,235/7,500 3,746/7,500 Total FAR (45% or 50% with bonus) 16% 50%
  • 8.
    8 POLICY ANALYSIS  Theproposed structure is 28’ in height (max allowed 28’) as measured from average grade.  The proposed structure does not exceed the maximum lot coverage of 40%.  The proposed structure complies with all required setbacks for the main and accessory structures
  • 9.
    9 POLICY ANALYSIS  Theproposed structure will have an exterior comprised of brick and wood siding (ship lap and shingle).  The proposed roof will be comprised of a standing seam metal roof.  The existing home was built in 1925 according to the Bexar County Appraisal District.
  • 10.
    10 POLICY ANALYSIS  Thefollowing bonuses were awarded to increase the allowable F.A.R. from 45% to 50%:  This application was received prior to the amendments to the RDS standards and the applicant is utilizing some bonuses that will no longer be available to subsequent applications.
  • 11.
    11 POLICY ANALYSIS -BONUSES  0.02% (Substantial Front Porch)  0.02% (Pervious Driveway Material)  0.02% (1 Story Garage)
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
    21 ARB RECOMMENDATION  OnDecember 15, 2015 the Architectural Review Board considered the request, found no significance in the existing structure, found the proposed replacement structure to be compatible, and recommended approval of the demolition request.
  • 22.
    22 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION  Postcardswere mailed to property owners within a 200-foot radius of the property, appropriate notice was posted on the City website and a sign was posted on the property  Responses received:  Support: (2)  Oppose: (1)
  • 23.