711 Evans

1. Case # 603F
Significance & Compatibility
Review
711 Evans Ave.
Presented By: Jason Lutz
Community Development Services Director
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item #7
December 14, 2015

2. CASE NO. 603F
 Consider a request of Request of Catherine
Nored Architect, representing David and Becky
Simpson, owners, for the significance and
compatibility review of the proposed
replacement structure located at 711 Evans
Ave under Demolition Review Ordinance No.
1860 (April 12, 2010) in order to encapsulate
100% of the existing exterior facing walls and
encapsulate 52% of the front-facing facade to
replace the existing exterior finish materials
and construct a new front porch.

3. SUMMARY
 The applicant is seeking to encapsulate the
existing brick home with stucco and add a
front porch (8’ 6” x 27’ 6”), as well as, replace
two existing widows with French doors and
remove/infill one existing double hung
window.
 The proposed modifications have triggered
ARB/Council review.

4. 4
BACKGROUND
 Legal Description (LOTS 13 & 14,
BLOCK 176, CB 4024)
 The property is zoned SF-A and is
located on the north side of Evans
Ave., between Ciruela St. and Loveta
St.

5. 5
PROJECT LOCATION

6. 6
POLICY ANALYSIS
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 15,000 15,000
Main House Footprint 2,800 2,800
Front Porch 0 238
Side Porch 1 0 0
Side Porch 2 0 0
Rear Porch 0 0
Garage Footprint 0 0
Carport Footprint 925 925
Shed(s) Footprint 0 0
Breezeways 0 0
Covered Patio Structure 0 0
Other Accessory Structures 0 0
Lot Coverage / Lot Area 3,725/15,000 3,963/15,000
Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 25% 26%

7. 7
POLICY ANALYSIS
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 15,000 15,000
Main House 1st Floor 2,800 3,038
Main House 2nd Floor 0 0
Garage 1st Floor 0 0
Garage 2nd Floor 0 0
Other Structures 0 0
FAR / Lot Area 2,800/15,000 3,038/15,000
Total FAR (45% or 50% with bonus) 19% 20%

8. 8
POLICY ANALYSIS
 The proposed addition (porch) complies
with the required front & side yard setbacks.
 The proposed addition (porch) will have a
standing seam metal roof to match the
existing home and painted wood columns.
 The existing home was built in 1949 and
staff has found no historical significance
concerning the architectural style or a noted
architect of record.

9. 9
SITE
PLAN

10. 10
PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION

11. 11
PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION

12. 12

13. 13

14. 14

15. 15

16. 16

17. 17
ARB RECOMMENDATION
 On November 17, 2015 the ARB
reviewed the case, found no
significance in the existing structure,
found the proposed modifications to be
compatible, and approved the request.

18. 18
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
 Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,
appropriate notice was posted on the City
website and a sign was posted on the
property
 Responses received:
 Support: (6)
 Oppose: (0)

19. QUESTIONS?