710 Ogden

1. Case # 677F
Compatibility Review
710 Ogden
Presented By: Jason Lutz
Community Development Services Director
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item # 7
August 28, 2017

2. CASE NO. 677F
 Consider a request of Bryan Smith, Vision
Design and Build, representing Vineet and
Sarah Seth, owners, for the compatibility
review of the proposed main structure
located at 710 Ogden under Demolition
Review Ordinance No. 1860 in order to
construct a new single-family residence
with attached accessory structure.

3. SUMMARY
 The applicant is seeking to construct a
new two-story single-family residence
with attached accessory structure.

4. 4
BACKGROUND
 Zoned SF-B
 Southeast intersection of Ogden & Viesca.
 Property subdivided into two new lots (May
2017).
 Construction on the newly created western lot
(left).
 The compatibility request was reviewed on
July 18, 2017 and tabled pending a redesign
of the roof.

5. 5

6. 6
POLICY ANALYSIS
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 13,910 13,910
Main House Footprint 3,224
Front Porch 94
Side Porch 1
Side Porch 2
Rear Porch 466
Garage Footprint 485
Carport Footprint
Shed(s) Footprint
Breezeways
Covered Patio Structure
Other Accessory Structures
Lot Coverage / Lot Area 4,269 / 13,910
Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) NA% (VACANT LOT) 30.7%

7. 7
POLICY ANALYSIS
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 15,027
Main House 1st Floor 3,224
Main House 2nd Floor 773
Accessory Structure 1st Floor 485
Accessory Structure 2nd Floor
Other Structures
FAR / Lot Area 4,482 / 13,910
Total FAR
(45% or max 50% with bonuses)
NA% (VACANT LOT) 32.2%

8. 8
POLICY ANALYSIS
 Height 29’- 10 1/4” .
 Structure complies with all regulations
concerning setbacks, height, and looming
standards.
 Building Materials
 Stucco
 Stone Veneer
 Composition shingle roof

9. 9
PROPOSED SITE PLAN

10. 10
FRONT ELEVATION

11. 11
REAR ELEVATION

12. 12
LEFT ELEVATION

13. 13
RIGHT ELEVATION

14. 14
ARB RECOMMENDATION
 Reviewed for “Compatibility” on Aug. 15, 2017
and approved with the following
recommendations:
 Number of roof elements on the front
elevation be reduced.
 That the angles of the main/central roof
structure be simplified.

15. 15
ARB RECOMMENDATION
 That the applicant provide updated
elevations, prior to Council Consideration, so
they could provide additional feedback.
 Staff has received comments from 3 of the 5
board members, present at the meeting.
 All 3 stated they were satisfied with the
updated changes and had no additional
comments/recommendations.

16. 16
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
 Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,
appropriate notice was posted on the City
website and a sign was posted on the
property
 Responses received:
 Support: (1)
 Oppose: (0)

17. QUESTIONS?