1. Case # 636F
Significance & Compatibility
Review
431 Normandy
Presented By: Jason Lutz
Community Development Services Director
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item #8
September 12, 2016
2. CASE NO. 636F
Consider a request of Deron Stadler,
Evolutionary Homes, applicant, representing H.
Milby Hartwell, owner, for the significance and
compatibility review of the proposed
replacement structure located at 431
Normandy under Demolition Review Ordinance
No. 1860 (April 12, 2010) in order to demolish
100% of the existing main structure and
construct a new single family residence with
detached accessory structure.
3. SUMMARY
Demolish 100% of the existing main
structure
Construct a new single family residence
with detached accessory structure.
6. 6
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 7,515 7,515
Main House Footprint 1,278 1,653
Front Porch 53 204
Side Porch 1
Side Porch 2
Rear Porch 240
Garage Footprint 612
Carport Footprint
Shed(s) Footprint 84
Breezeways
Covered Patio Structure
Other Accessory Structures
Lot Coverage / Lot Area 1,395 / 7,515 2,709 / 7,515
Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 19% 36%
7. 7
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 7,515 7,515
Main House 1st Floor 1,278 1,653
Main House 2nd Floor 740
Garage 1st Floor 612
Garage 2nd Floor
Other Structures 84
FAR / Lot Area
1,395 / 7,515 3,005 / 7,515
Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 19% 40%
8. 8
POLICY ANALYSIS
27’ 10 11/16” in height (max allowed 28’)
as measured from average grade.
Building Materials
Hardie siding
Standing seam metal Roof
9. 9
POLICY ANALYSIS
The existing 1,278 sq. ft. home was built in
1917.
No evidence that the home was
built by a noted architect
belongs to a distinct architectural style
or has any major historical significance
22. 22
ARB RECOMMENDATION
No significance in the existing structure
Proposed replacement structure is
compatible
Approved as requested
23. 23
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,
appropriate notice was posted on the City
website and a sign was posted on the
property
Responses received:
Support: (1)
Oppose: (1)