301 Ogden

1. Case # 633F
Significance & Compatibility
Review
301 Ogden
Presented By: Jason Lutz
Community Development Services Director
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item # 6
July 25, 2016

2. CASE # 633F - SUMMARY
 The applicant is seeking to demolish
100% of the existing main structure in
order to construct a new single family
residence with detached accessory
structure.

3. 3
BACKGROUND
 Zoned SF-B
 Northwest corner of Ogden Ln. and
Columbine St.

4. 4

5. 5
LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 5,932 5,932
Main House Footprint 928 1,429
Front Porch
Side Porch 1
Side Porch 2
Rear Porch
Garage Footprint 288
Carport Footprint 312
Shed(s) Footprint 75
Breezeways
Covered Patio Structure
Other Accessory Structures
Lot Coverage / Lot Area 1,216 / 5,932 1,741 / 5,932
Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 20% 29%

6. 6
FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED
Lot Area 5,932 5,932
Main House 1st Floor 928 1,429
Main House 2nd Floor 1,166
Garage 1st Floor 288
Garage 2nd Floor
Other Structures 312
FAR / Lot Area 1,216 /
5,932
2,907 / 5,932
Total FAR (45% or max 50% with bonuses) 12% 49%

7. 7
POLICY ANALYSIS
 Bonuses Granted:
 2% for a one story accessory structure.
 2% for a parking area that utilized
side/alley access.
 26’in height (max allowed 28’).

8. 8
POLICY ANALYSIS
 Complies with all regulations concerning
setbacks, height, and looming
standards.
 Building Materials
 Hardie siding
 Vertical board and batten.
 Asphalt Shingle Roof

9. 9
POLICY ANALYSIS
 Existing 928sq. ft. home was built in
1953.
 (Significance Review) No evidence that
the home was:
 built by a noted architect
 belongs to a distinct architectural style
 or has any major historical significance

10. 10
EXISTING
SITE PLAN

11. 11
EXISTING
STRUCTURE

12. 12
EXISTING
STRUCTURE

13. 13
PROPOSED
SITE PLAN

14. 14
FRONT ELEVATION

15. 15
REAR ELEVATION

16. 16
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION (COLUMBINE)

17. 17
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION

18. 18
RENDERING

19. 19
STREETSCAPE

20. 20
ARB RECOMMENDATION
 ARB Review – July 19, 2016
 No significance in existing structure
 Replacement structure is
compatible
 Approved as presented

21. 21
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
 Postcards were mailed to property owners
within a 200-foot radius of the property,
appropriate notice was posted on the City
website and a sign was posted on the
property
 Responses received:
 Support: (0)
 Oppose: (0)

22. QUESTIONS?